Cross-validation of a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score–based model to predict mortality in patients with cancer admitted to the intensive care unit

Purpose

This study aims to validate the performance of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score to predict death of critically ill patients with cancer.

Material and methods

We conducted a retrospective observational study including adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2008. We randomly selected training and validation samples in medical and surgical admissions to predict ICU and in-hospital mortality. By using logistic regression, we calculated the probabilities of death in the training samples and applied them to the validation samples to test the goodness-of-fit of the models, construct receiver operator characteristics curves, and calculate the areas under the curve (AUCs).

Results

In predicting mortality at discharge from the unit, the AUC from the validation group of medical admissions was 0.7851 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7437-0.8264), and the AUC from the surgical admissions was 0.7847 (95% CI, 0.6319-0.937). The AUCs of the SOFA score to predict mortality in the hospital after ICU admission were 0.7789 (95% CI, 0.74-0.8177) and 0.7572 (95% CI, 0.6719-0.8424) for the medical and surgical validations groups, respectively.

Conclusions

The SOFA score had good discrimination to predict ICU and hospital mortality. However, the observed underestimation of ICU deaths and unsatisfactory goodness-of-fit test of the model in surgical patients to indicate calibration of the score to predict ICU mortality is advised in this group.     

Eosinopenia: Is it a good marker of sepsis in comparison to procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels for patients admitted to a critical care unit in an urban hospital?

IntroductionThe role of eosinopenia as a marker of sepsis has recently been evaluated. The aim of our study was to test the value of eosinopenia as a diagnostic marker of sepsis in comparison to procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels.MethodsA prospective study of critically ill adult patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit at an urban hospital. Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and eosinophil counts were measured on admission. Patients were classified as non-infected or infected by the medical residents, fellows, and attendings.ResultsA total of 68 patients were enrolled into the study. At a cut-off value of 70 mg/L, the CRP level yielded a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 84%, a positive predicted value (PPV) of 83% and a negative predicted value (NPV) of 94%. At a cutoff value of 1.5 μg/L, the sensitivity of the procalcitonin test was 84%, specificity of 92%, PPV 90%, and NPV of 87%. The eosinophil cell count (cutoff of 50 cells/mm³) produced a sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 65%, a PPV of 66%, and a NPV of 80%.The comparison of the eosinophil cell count (<50 cells/mm³) and procalcitonin levels among the non-infected and infected groups showed a significant statistical difference (Fisher exact test, P = .0239). There was no statistical difference observed when comparisons were made between CRP levels and eosinophil count (Fisher exact test, P = .12). There was also a lack of significant statistical difference when CRP levels were compared to procalcitonin levels (Fisher exact test, P = .49).ConclusionEosinopenia is a very sensitive yet not specific serological marker of sepsis in the intensive care unit and can be utilized to guide physicians in the diagnosis of sepsis.     

Is there a suitable point-of-care glucose meter for tight glycemic control? Evaluation of one home-use and four hospital-use meters in an intensive care unit

Abstract Background: Implementation of tight glycemic control (TGC) and avoidance of hypoglycemia in intensive care unit (ICU) patients require frequent analysis of blood glucose. This can be achieved by accurate point-of-care (POC) hospital-use glucose meters. In this study one home-use and four different hospital-use POC glucose meters were evaluated in critically ill ICU patients. Methods: All patients (n=80) requiring TGC were included in this study. For each patient three to six glucose measurements (n=390) were performed. Blood glucose was determined by four hospital-use POC glucose meters, Roche Accu-Check Inform II System, HemoCue Glu201DM, Nova StatStrip, Abbott Precision Xceed Pro, and one home-use POC glucose meter, Menarini GlucoCard Memory PC. The criteria described in ISO 15197, Dutch TNO quality guideline and in NACB/ADA-2011 were applied in the comparisons. Results: According to the ISO 15197, the percentages of the measured values that fulfilled the criterion were 99.5% by Roche, 95.1% by HemoCue, 91.0% by Nova, 96.6% by Abbott, and 63.3% by Menarini. According to the TNO quality guideline these percentages were 96.1%, 91.0%, 81.8%, 94.2%, and 47.7%, respectively. Application of the NACB/ADA guideline resulted in percentages of 95.6%, 89.2%, 77.9%, 93.4%, and 45.4%, respectively. Conclusions: When ISO 15197 was applied, Roche, HemoCue and Abbott fulfilled the criterion in this patient population, whereas Nova and Menarini did not. However, when TNO quality guideline and NACB/ADA 2011 guideline were applied only Roche fulfilled the criteria.     

Is it possible to feel at home in a patient room in an intensive care unit? Reflections on environmental aspects in technology‐dense environments

This paper focuses on the patient's perspective and the philosophical underpinnings that support what might be considered optimal for the future design of the intensive care unit (ICU) patient room. It also addresses the question of whether the aspects that support at‐homeness are applicable to ICU patient rooms. The concept of “at‐homeness” in ICUs is strongly related to privacy and control of space and territory. This study investigates whether the sense of at‐homeness can be created in an ICU, when one or more patients share a room. From an interdisciplinary perspective, we critically reflect on various aspects associated with conflicts surrounding the use of ICU patient rooms. Thus, from an architectural and a caring perspective, the significance of space and personal territory in ICU patient rooms is emphasized. Recommendations for further research are suggested. In conclusion, privacy and control are deemed to be essential factors in the stimulation of recovery processes and the promotion of well‐being in situations involving severe illness or life‐threatening conditions.