Potency and time course of action of rocuronium during desflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia

We have studied the potency and onset and duration of action of rocuronium in patients anaesthetized with 1 MAC of desflurane or isoflurane (in 66% nitrous oxide). Potency was estimated using the single bolus dose technique. Neuromuscular block was measured by stimulation of the ulnar nerve and recording the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle. The ED50 and ED95 of rocuronium were estimated as 138 (95% confidence limits 117-162) micrograms kg-1 and 281 (241-328) micrograms kg-1, and 126 (105-151) micrograms kg-1 and 283 (236-339) micrograms kg-1 during desflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia, respectively. The mean times to onset of maximum block after rocuronium 0.6 mg kg-1 were 1.0 (SD 0.10) min and 1.1 (0.15) min, respectively, during anaesthesia with desflurane and isoflurane. The respective times to recovery of T1 (the first response in the train-of- four (TOF) stimulation) to 25% and 90% were 36 (8.3) min and 54 (15.4) min during desflurane anaesthesia and 31 (8.2) min and 45 (12.7) min during isoflurane anaesthesia. The times to recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.7 were 66 (13.4) min and 52 (16.3) min and the 25-75% recovery indices 14 (5.3) min and 10 (3.2) min, respectively, in the desflurane and isoflurane groups. There were no differences in the estimated potency or onset of action of rocuronium during desflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia. However, duration of action tended to be longer curing desflurane anaesthesia although only the differences in times to TOF ratio of 0.7 and the recovery indices were close to being significantly different (P = 0.0503 and 0.0560).      

Augmentation of the neuromuscular blocking effects of cisatracurium during desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane or total i.v. anaesthesia

We have evaluated the enhancement of cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block by potent inhalation anaesthetic agents, by constructing dose-effect curves for cisatracurium in 84 patients during anaesthesia with 1.5 MAC (70% nitrous oxide) desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane or total i.v. anaesthesia (TIVA). Acceleromyography (TOF- Guard) and train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve were used (2 Hz every 12 s). Cisatracurium was administered in increments of 15 micrograms kg-1 until depression of T1/T0 > 95% was reached. ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.2). Depression of T1/T0 during potent inhalation anaesthesia was enhanced compared with TIVA. ED50 and ED95 values of cisatracurium were 15 (SD 5) and 34 (10) micrograms kg-1 for desflurane; 15 (4) and 32 (7) micrograms kg-1 for sevoflurane; and 15 (5) and 33 (9) micrograms kg-1 for isoflurane. These were significantly lower than the values for TIVA (21 (4) and 51 (13) micrograms kg-1) (P < 0.01 in each case). After equi-effective dosing, times to T1/T0 = 25% were similar in all groups (19 (7), 19 (5), 20 (5) vs 16 (4) min). Recovery index25-75% and time to a TOF ration of 0.70 were prolonged significantly by desflurane and sevoflurane compared with TIVA (18 (5), 19 (8) vs 12 (4) min and 43 (11), 44 (10) vs 35 (5) min, respectively), whereas the difference was not significant for isoflurane (14 (6) and 41 (7) min).      

Potency and time course of mivacurium block during sevoflurane, isoflurane and intravenous anesthesia

PURPOSE: To determine the potency and time course of action of mivacurium neuromuscular block under routine clinical conditions during sevoflurane, isoflurane and intravenous anesthesia. METHOD: Patients were anesthetized with nitrous oxide 66% in oxygen and 1.5 MAC sevoflurane or isoflurane or a propofol infusion, neuromuscular block being monitored using mechanomyography. Potency was determined using administration of single doses of mivacurium of 40-100 micrograms.kg-1 and construction of dose-response curves (n = 72). The onset and duration of action were determined following a bolus dose of 0.2 mg.kg-1 of mivacurium (n = 30). RESULTS: The ED50 and ED95 (with 95% confidence limits) were estimated to be 42 (35-51) and 86 (74-98) micrograms.kg-1, 52 (45-60) and 89 (72-110) micrograms.kg-1, and 53 (45-62) and 95 (81-112) micrograms.kg-1 during sevoflurane, isoflurane and propofol anesthesia respectively (P < 0.05 between sevoflurane and propofol). Following administration of the 0.2 mg.kg-1 dose, neither the times (mean +/- SD) to maximum block (1.6 +/- 0.31, 1.7 +/- 0.21 and 1.6 +/- 0.45 min, respectively) nor the times to 25 and 90% recovery of T1 (20 +/- 4.5 and 33 +/- 8.8 min, 21 +/- 3.8 and 33 +/- 6.5 min, and 18 +/- 4.1 and 28 +/- 5.8 min respectively) were different among groups. The times to recovery of TOF ratio to 0.8 were 40 +/- 10.0, 36 +/- 8.5 and 29 +/- 5.5 min in the sevoflurane, isoflurane and propofol groups respectively (P = 0.017 between the sevoflurane and propofol groups). CONCLUSIONS: Under usual conditions of clinical anesthesia the potency of mivacurium was slightly enhanced during sevoflurane compared with intravenous anesthesia but the duration of action was only minimally prolonged during sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia.     

Neuromuscular blocking effects of rocuronium during desflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane anaesthesia

Purpose

To determine the magnitude of the potentiation of rocuronium by desflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane 1.5 MAC anaesthesia.

Methods

In a prospective, randomised, study in 80 patients, the cumulative dose-effect curves for rocuronium were determined during anaesthesia with desflurane, sevoflurane and isoflurane (with N₂O 70%, 15 min steady state) or total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) using propofol/fentanyl. Neuromuscular block was assessed by acceleromyography (TOF-Guard®) after train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve (2Hz every 12sec, 200 μsec duration), Rocuronium was administered in increments of 100 μg·kg^?1 until first twitch (T₁) depression > 95%.

Results

Rocuronium led to more pronounced T₁ depression with desflurane or sevoflurane anaesthesia than with TIVA. The ED₅₀ and ED₉₅ were lower during desflurane (95 ± 25 and 190 ± 80 μg·kg^?1) and sevoflurane (120 ±30 and 210 ± 40 μg·kg^?1) than with TIVA (150 ± 40 and 310 ± 90 μg·kg^?1) (P < .01), while the difference was not significant for isoflurane (130 ± 40 and 250 ± 90 μg·kg^?1). Following equi-effective dosing (T₁ > 95%) the duration to 25% T₁ recovery, recovery index (25/75), and TOF_0.70 was: 13.2 ± 1.8, 12.7 ± 3.4, and 26.9 ± 5.7 min during anaesthesia with desflurane; 15.5 ± 5.0, 11.4 ± 3.8, and 31.0 ± 6.0 min with sevoflurane; 13.9 ± 4.7, 10.7 ± 3.3, and 26.3 ± 8.9 min with isoflurane; and 13.9 ± 3.9, 11.3 ± 5.7, and 27.5 ± 8,2 min with TIVA anaesthesia (P: NS).

Conclusion

Interaction of rocuronium and volatile anaesthetics resulted in augmentation of the intensity of neuromuscular block but did not result in significant effects on duration of or recovery from the block.     

A comparison of antagonism of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade during sevoflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia

Volatile anaesthetic agents potentiate neuromuscular blocking agents and retard their rate of reversal. We hypothesised that there was a difference in the rate of reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade based on the selection of inhalation agent. Thirty-eight patients undergoing elective surgical procedures received either sevoflurane or isoflurane, by random allocation. Neuromuscular blockade was induced using rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1 followed by continuous intravenous infusion to maintain 90% suppression of the single twitch response. Upon completion of surgery, the rocuronium infusion was discontinued, neostigmine 50 microg.kg-1 and glycopyrrolate 10 microg.kg-1 were administered. Times from reversal to T1 = 25, 50 and 60% and train-of-four ratio = 0.6 were recorded. The mean (SD) times to train-of-four ratio = 0.6 in the isoflurane and sevoflurane groups were 327 (132) and 351 (127) s, respectively. The mean (SD) times to single twitch response T1 = 25, 50 and 60% in the isoflurane group were 81 (33), 161 (59) and 245 (84) s, respectively, and in the sevoflurane group were 95 (35), 203 (88) and 252 (127) s, respectively. It is concluded that reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade is similar during isoflurane and sevoflurane anaesthesia.     

Inhalation anaesthesia is cost-effective for ambulatory surgery: a clinical comparison with propofol during elective knee arthroscopy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cost consciousness has become increasingly important in anaesthesia as elsewhere in healthcare. Cost-minimization with uncompromised patient safety and quality requires systematic comparisons of alternative techniques. Inhalation anaesthesia with desflurane or sevoflurane is compared in this study with propofol delivered by the target controlled infusion technique. Directly measured drug consumption and costs and emergence times are compared. METHODS: Consumed anaesthetics were measured during elective arthroscopy of the knee, and costs were calculated for ASA I-II patients (n = 102) randomized to 3 groups: one group received anaesthesia using propofol administered by target controlled infusion, the others inhalation anaesthesia with either desflurane or sevoflurane in combination with nitrous oxide. A partial rebreathing system was used with a laryngeal mask airway. Vaporizers were weighed before and after each anaesthetic. RESULTS: Anaesthetic duration, postoperative pain and emesis as well as discharge time did not differ between groups. Inhaled anaesthetic techniques with desflurane or sevoflurane were associated with 2-3 min shorter emergence times (P < 0.001) and approximately 45% lower cost for consumed anaesthetics as compared with a propofol technique based on target controlled infusion. The inclusion of waste costs improved the cost reduction to 55%. CONCLUSIONS: For this patient group, use of inhalation anaesthesia reduced drug costs by half and shortened emergence times compared to target controlled infusion with propofol with equal perioperative patient conditions.     

Desflurane reduces the effective therapeutic infusion rate (ETI) of cisatracurium more than isoflurane, sevoflurane, or propofol

PURPOSE: The present study investigated the interaction between the cumulative dose requirements of cisatracurium and anesthesia with isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane or propofol using closed-loop feedback control. METHODS: Fifty-six patients (18-85 yr, vitrectomies of more than one hour) were studied. In the volatile anesthetics groups, anesthesia was maintained by 1.3 MAC of isoflurane, sevoflurane or desflurane; in the propofol group, anesthesia was maintained by a continuous infusion of 6-8 mg.kg(-1).hr(-1) propofol. After bolus application of 0.1 mg.kg(-1) cisatracurium, a T1%-level of 10% of control level (train-of-four stimulation every 20 sec) was maintained using closed-loop feedback controlled infusion of cisatracurium. The effective therapeutic infusion rate (ETI) was estimated from the asymptotic steady-state infusion rate Iss. The Iss was derived from fitting an asymptotic line to the measured cumulative dose requirement curve. The ETI of the different groups was compared using Kruskal-Wallis- test, followed by rank sum test, corrected for the number of comparisons, P <0.05 was regarded as showing significant difference. RESULTS: ETI in the isoflurane group was 35.6 +/- 8.6 microg.m(-2).min(-1), in the sevoflurane group 36.4+/- 11.9 microg m(-2).min(-1), in the desflurane group 23.8 +/- 6.3 microg.m(-2).min(-1). The ETI of the volatile anesthetic groups were all significantly lower than the ETI in the propofol group at 61.7 +/- 25.3 microg.m(-2).min(-1) (P <0.002). The ETI in the desflurane group was significantly lower than in all other groups (P <0.02). CONCLUSION: In comparison to propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane reduce the cumulative dose requirements of cisatracurium to maintain a 90% neuromuscular blockade by 42%, 41% and 60%, respectively.     

Rocuronium duration of action under sevoflurane, desflurane or propofol anaesthesia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We conducted a prospective randomized study to evaluate whether the duration of action of a single bolus dose of rocuronium is influenced by maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane, desflurane or propofol infusion. METHODS: Fifty-seven ASA I-II patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery were enrolled in this study. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopental 3-5 mg kg(-1) or propofol 2.5 mg kg(-1) and fentanyl 5 microg kg(-1) and tracheal intubation was facilitated with rocuronium 0.9 mg kg(-1). Thereafter patients were randomly allocated to three different groups to receive sevoflurane, desflurane or propofol for maintenance of anaesthesia. Recovery of neuromuscular function was monitored by single twitch stimulation of the ulnar nerve and by recording the adductor pollicis response using accelerometry. Intergroup recovery times to 5% of control value of single twitch were analysed using analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: The mean (95% confidence interval) recovery time to 5% of control value of single twitch during desflurane anaesthesia was 90.18 (86.11-94.25) min. Significantly shorter recovery times were observed during sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia, 58.86 (54.73-62.99) min and 51.11 (45.47-56.74) min, respectively (P < 0.001). There were also significant differences in the recovery time between groups receiving desflurane vs. sevoflurane (P < 0.001) and desflurane vs. propofol (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Desflurane anaesthesia significantly prolongs the duration of action of rocuronium at 0.9 mg kg(-1) single bolus dose, compared to sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia maintenance regimens.     

Anaesthesia, recovery and postoperative nausea and vomiting after breast surgery. A comparison between desflurane, sevoflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia

BACKGROUND: Whereas induction and recovery will occur more rapidly with the new low soluble anaesthetics than with isoflurane, the quality of anaesthesia and recovery with special emphasis on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is not well known. METHODS: In an open (peroperatively), double-blinded (postoperatively), randomised controlled study, we assessed anaesthesia characteristics, recovery and 24 h PONV after breast surgery comparing isoflurane, desflurane and sevoflurane. RESULTS: There were no significant quality differences between the three agents during anaesthesia and recovery except for the incidence of PONV in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU). The PONV rate (24 h in PACU and ward) was higher in the desflurane group (67%) than in the isoflurane group (22%), (P<0.01). The corresponding PONV rate for sevoflurane was 36%. CONCLUSION: The quality of anaesthesia, time to opening of eyes and influence on respiration was similar with all three anaesthetics. As the emergence from anaesthesia did not differ significantly between the three agents, the choice of agent could be based on PONV rate and price. Desflurane had a significantly higher 24 h PONV rate than isoflurane. Early PACU PONV rate was significantly (P<0.05) lower for the more soluble isoflurane (4%) than for the low soluble gases, desflurane and sevoflurane together (28%). The result of this study does not give a rationale for a transition to the new low soluble agents in breast cancer surgery.     

地氟醚七氟醚对糖尿病患者罗库溴铵肌松效应影响的比较

目的 比较地氟醚和七氟醚对糖尿病患者罗库溴铵肌松效应的影响.方法 择期2型糖尿病腹部手术患者60例,年龄45～64岁,ASA分级Ⅱ级,采用随机数字表法分为3组,每组20例:地氟醚组(DD组)、七氟醚组(SD组)和异丙酚组(PD组).静脉注射咪达唑仑、异丙酚和芬太尼行麻醉诱导后启动肌松监测,3组分别用异丙酚、地氟醚和七氟醚维持麻醉.记录肌松维持时间和恢复指数.于静脉注射罗库溴铵后10、20、30、40、50、60、70、80、90、100、110、120 min时记录T1/T0比值及T4/T1比值[四个成串刺激(train-of-four stimulation, TOF)比值].结果 DD组和SD组患者罗库溴铵的维持时间[(61±17),(60±18) min]、恢复指数[(36±12),(35±10) min]之间差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),且均大于PD组(P＜0.05).DD组、SD组患者静脉注射罗库溴铵后60～120 min时T1/T0比值和TOF比值差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),且均大于PD组(P＜0.05).结论 地氟醚和七氟醚对糖尿病患者罗库溴铵肌松效应的影响差异无统计学意义.     

Recovery after anaesthesia for pulmonary surgery: desflurane, sevoflurane and isoflurane

We have studied maintenance and recovery profiles after general anaesthesia with sevoflurane, desflurane and isoflurane in 100 patients undergoing pulmonary surgery. End-tidal concentrations of anaesthetic required to maintain mean arterial pressure and heart rate within 20% of baseline values were 1.4 +/- 0.6% for sevoflurane, 3.4 +/- 0.9% for desflurane and 0.7 +/- 0.3% for isoflurane. The three anaesthetics had comparable haemodynamic effects and arterial oxygenation during one- lung ventilation. Emergence was twice as fast with desflurane than with sevoflurane or isoflurane (mean times to extubation: 8.9 (SD 5.0) min, 18.0 (17.0) min and 16.2 (11.0) min for desflurane, sevoflurane and isoflurane, respectively). Early recovery (Aldrete score, cognitive and psychomotor functions) was also more rapid after desflurane. In pulmonary surgery, desflurane, but not sevoflurane, allowed more rapid emergence and earlier recovery than isoflurane.      

The use of low-dose rocuronium to facilitate laryngeal mask airway insertion

In this two-phase study, the efficacy of low-dose rocuronium to facilitate laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion was evaluated. First, the onset time of 100, 150 and 300 micrograms.kg-1 rocuronium was determined using mechanomyography in three groups of patients (n = 10 in each) anaesthetized with propofol-fentanyl-nitrous oxide. In the second part, 100, 150 or 300 micrograms.kg-1 rocuronium or placebo was administered randomly to four groups of patients (n = 50 in each) in a double-blind manner. Following this, anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1. Patients in the group of 300 micrograms.kg-1 rocuronium or placebo received propofol after 1.5 min. Patients in the group of 100 or 150 micrograms.kg-1 rocuronium received propofol after 3 min. The LMA was inserted 90 sec later. Immediately before the induction of anaesthesia, patients were questioned about the symptoms of neuromuscular block. In phase 1, onset times were 180 sec (SD 41), 191 sec (59) and 89 sec (34), respectively. In phase 2, insertion of the LMA was graded as easy in 90.6% of patients receiving rocuronium, compared with 42% of patients who had only propofol (P < 0.05). Rocuronium improved the overall ease of LMA insertion. LMA insertion was graded easy in 80% of patients who received 100 micrograms.kg-1 rocuronium. The incidence of unpleasant effects was greatest with 300 micrograms.kg-1 rocuronium. The optimal dose needed to facilitate LMA insertion with minimal unpleasant effects appeared to be 100 micrograms.kg-1 rocuronium.     

Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol with rocuronium for modified rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia

We compared the use of sevoflurane and propofol with three different doses of rocuronium for modified rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia. One hundred and forty adult patients were randomly allocated to have a rapid-sequence intravenous induction with propofol 2-3 mg.kg-1 (group P) or an inhalational induction with sevoflurane 8% in oxygen, using a vital capacity technique (group S). Following loss of the eyelash reflex, cricoid pressure was applied and 20 patients in each group were administered rocuronium 0.3 (groups P/0.3 and S/0.3), 0.45 (groups P/0.45 and S/0.45) or 0.6 (groups P/0.6 and S/0.6) mg.kg-1. An additional 10 patients in each group received only saline placebo in place of the muscle relaxant (groups P/Saline and S/Saline). Laryngoscopy was started 60 s later and intubating conditions evaluated by a blinded anaesthetist according to a standard scoring system. Intubating conditions were acceptable in one patient and no patient, respectively, following induction with sevoflurane and propofol without the muscle relaxant. The conditions were acceptable in 30, 55 and 90% of subjects with sevoflurane induction, and in 45, 80 and 90% of subjects with propofol induction following 0.3, 0.45 and 0.6 mg.kg-1 of rocuronium, respectively (no significant difference for each dose of rocuronium). The present study shows that intubating conditions during a rapid-sequence induction using rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1 following induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol are similar.     

Desflurane maintains intraocular pressure at an equivalent level to isoflurane and propofol during unstressed non-ophthalmic surgery

We have investigated the effects of desflurane compared with isoflurane and propofol on intraocular pressure (IOP) in 48 ASA I-II patients undergoing elective non-ophthalmic surgery. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopental 3-5 mg kg-1, fentanyl 2-4 micrograms kg-1 and vecuronium 0.1 mg kg-1. Patients were allocated randomly to receive propofol (n = 16) 4-8 mg kg-1 h-1, isoflurane (n = 16) or desflurane (n = 16) for maintenance of anaesthesia. Fentanyl was added if necessary. The lungs were ventilated with 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Arterial pressure, electrocardiography, heart rate and end-tidal carbon dioxide were measured throughout anaesthesia. IOP was measured before surgery, during maintenance and after emergence from anaesthesia with applanation tonometry by an ophthalmologist blinded to the anaesthetic technique. There was a significant decrease in IOP after induction of anaesthesia which did not differ between groups. Desflurane maintained IOP at an equivalent level to isoflurane and propofol.      

Effects of enflurane, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane on reperfusion injury after regional myocardial ischaemia in the rabbit heart in vivo

It is known that volatile anaesthetics protect myocardial tissue against ischaemic and reperfusion injury in vitro. In this investigation, we have determined the effects of the inhalation anaesthetics, enflurane, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane, administered only during early reperfusion, on myocardial reperfusion injury in vivo. Fifty chloralose-anaesthetized rabbits were subjected to 30 min of occlusion of a major coronary artery followed by 120 min of reperfusion. Left ventricular pressure (LVP, tip-manometer), cardiac output (CO, ultrasonic flow probe) and infarct size (triphenyltetrazolium staining) were determined. During the first 15 min of reperfusion, five groups of 10 rabbits each received 1 MAC of enflurane (enflurane group), isoflurane (isoflurane group), sevoflurane (sevoflurane group) or desflurane (desflurane group), and 10 rabbits served as untreated controls (control group). Haemodynamic baseline values were similar between groups (mean LVP 106 (SEM 2) mm Hg; CO 281(7) ml min-1). During coronary occlusion, LVP and CO were reduced to the same extent in all groups (LVP 89% of baseline; CO 89%). Administration of inhalation anaesthetics during early reperfusion further reduced both variables, but they recovered after discontinuation of the anaesthetics to values not different from control animals. Infarct size was reduced from 49 (5)% of the area at risk in the control group to 32 (3)% in the desflurane group (P = 0.021), and to 36 (2)% in the sevoflurane group (P = 0.097). In the enflurane group, infarct size was 39 (5)% (P = 0.272). Isoflurane had no effect on infarct size (48 (5)%, P = 1.000). The results show that desflurane and sevoflurane markedly reduced infarct size and therefore can protect myocardium against reperfusion injury in vivo. Enflurane had only a marginal effect and isoflurane offered no protection against reperfusion injury in vivo. These different effects suggest different protective mechanisms at the cellular level.      

The influence of halothane, isoflurane and sevoflurane on rocuronium infusion in children

BACKGROUND: Rocuronium is a non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent with intermediate duration of action and without significant cumulative properties, suitable for continuous infusion. This study was designed to determine the infusion requirements in children under nitrous oxide and fentanyl, halothane, isoflurane or sevoflurane anaesthesia. METHODS: Forty children, 3-11 years old, ASA physical status group I or II were studied. They were randomly allocated to receive fentanyl-nitrous oxide, 1 MAC halothane-nitrous oxide, 1 MAC isoflurane-nitrous oxide or 1 MAC sevoflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia. Rocuronium, 0.6 mg(-1) was used to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Electromyographic response of adductor pollicis to train-of-four (TOF) stimulation, 2 Hz for 2 s, applied to the ulnar nerve at 10-s intervals was recorded using Relaxograph (Datex, Helsinki, Finland). Once the first twitch response (T1) returned to 5%, muscle relaxation was maintained by continuous infusion of rocuronium, adjusted automatically in a closed-loop system to maintain a stable 90-99% T1 depression. The block was considered stable if it changed by no more than 2% over a 10-min observation period. RESULTS: Halothane, isoflurane and sevoflurane groups had ower infusion requirements than the fentanyl-nitrous oxide group (P<0.00075). Rocuronium requirement (mean +/- SD) at one hour from the commencement of anaesthesia was 16.7+/-2.3, 13.6+/-3.7, 13.1+/-5.1 and 8.4+/-1.6 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for children receiving fentanyl-nitrous oxide, halothane, isoflurane and sevoflurane anaesthesia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The rocuronium infusion rate required to maintain stable 90-99% T1 depression was reduced by approximately 20% with halothane and isoflurane anaesthesia, and by 50% with evoflurane anaesthesia when compared to fentanyl-nitrous oxide anaesthesia. Significant patient-to-patient variability of infusion rate makes monitoring of neuromuscular transmission necessary.     

Desflurane and isoflurane improve neurological outcome after incomplete cerebral ischaemia in rats

We have investigated the effects of isoflurane and desflurane on neurological outcome in a rat model of incomplete cerebral ischaemia. We studied 40 non-fasted male Sprague-Dawley rats, anaesthetized, intubated and ventilated mechanically with isoflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen (FlO2 0.3). Arterial and venous catheters were inserted for measurement of arterial pressure, drug administration and blood sampling. A biparietal electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded continuously using subdermal platinum electrodes. At completion of surgery, administration of isoflurane was discontinued (with the exception of those animals receiving isoflurane as treatment) and rats were allowed an equilibration period of 30 min according to the following procedure: group 1 (n = 10), 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen and fentanyl (bolus 10 micrograms kg-1 i.v. followed by infusion at a rate of 25 micrograms kg-1 h-1); group 2 (n = 10), 1.0 MAC of isoflurane in oxygen (FlO2 0.3) and air; groups 3 and 4 (n = 10 per group), 1.0 MAC or 1.5 MAC of desflurane in oxygen (FlO2 0.3) and air, respectively. Ischaemia was produced by combined unilateral common carotid artery ligation and haemorrhagic hypotension to 35 mm Hg for 30 min. Functional neurological deficit was evaluated for 3 days after cerebral ischaemia. At baseline, brain electrical activity was higher with fentanyl-nitrous oxide, 1.0 MAC of isoflurane and 1.0 MAC of desflurane (groups 1-3) compared with 1.5 MAC of desflurane (group 4). Neurological outcome was improved in isoflurane and desflurane anaesthetized animals (groups 2-4), regardless of the concentration used compared with fentanyl-nitrous oxide anaesthesia (group 1). The increase in plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations during ischaemia was significantly higher in fentanyl-nitrous oxide anaesthetized animals (group 1) compared with animals who received volatile anaesthetics (groups 2-4). These data suggest that cerebral protection produced by isoflurane and desflurane appears to be related to reduction in sympathetic activity rather than suppression of cerebral metabolic rate.      

Effects of halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane on myocardial reperfusion injury in the isolated rat heart

A specific action against myocardial reperfusion injury of the oxygen paradox type was recently characterized for halothane after anoxic perfusion in isolated rat hearts and isolated cardiomyocytes. In this study, we have characterized the protective effects of the clinically available inhalation anaesthetics during reperfusion after ischaemia. In isolated, isovolumically beating rat hearts perfused at a constant flow (10 ml min-1, PO2 80 kPa) and paced at 350 beat min-1, we determined left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and release of creatine kinase (CKR) as indices of myocardial performance and cellular injury, respectively. Seven control hearts underwent 30 min of no-flow ischaemia and 1 h of reperfusion. In the treatment groups, halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, sevoflurane or desflurane (each group n = 6) was added to the perfusion medium for the first 30 min of reperfusion at a concentration corresponding to 1.5 MAC in the rat. In the control group, cellular injury occurred at early reperfusion (peak CKR 283 (SEM 57) iu litre-1 at 10 min of reperfusion). Peak CKR to the coronary venous effluent was attenuated by all anaesthetics (halothane group 156 (45), enflurane group 134 (20), sevoflurane group 132 (20), desflurane group 159 (25) iu litre-1; each P < 0.05). Isoflurane did not differ from controls (303 (53) iu litre-1; P = 0.5). In the sevoflurane group, there was a delayed peak CKR after discontinuation of the anaesthetic at 30 min of reperfusion (260 (34) iu litre-1). Functional recovery was improved by all anaesthetics, but was seen much earlier with desflurane (LVDP 28 (3)% of baseline at 5 min reperfusion compared with halothane (6 (1)%), enflurane (11 (3)%), isoflurane (9 (6)%), sevoflurane (10 (2)%) and controls (3 (1)% of baseline)). At 30 min of reperfusion, recovery of LVDP was improved to a similar extent by all anaesthetics (halothane 30 (9)%, enflurane 36 (9)%, isoflurane 33 (5)%, sevoflurane 30 (5)%, desflurane 36 (4)% of baseline values) compared with controls (13 (5)%; each P < 0.05). All inhalation anaesthetics protected against myocardial reperfusion injury, but showed differences in attenuation of cellular injury and functional recovery. These differences may suggest different protective mechanisms.      

Recovery and discharge of patients after long propofol infusion vs isoflurane anaesthesia for ambulatory surgery

Fifty unpremedicated patients scheduled for outpatient restorative dentistry and/or oral surgery lasting 2 to 4 h were anaesthetized with either propofol infusion or isoflurane inhalation. Before induction of anaesthesia with propofol (2.5 mg.kg-1), all patients were given 75 mg of diclofenac and 0.01 mg.kg-1 vecuronium intravenously. Intubation was facilitated with suxamethonium (1.5 mg.kg-1) and anaesthesia was maintained in random order either with propofol infusion (12 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the first 20 min, 9 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the next 20 min, and 6 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the rest of the anaesthesia) or with isoflurane (inspired concentration 1-2.5%), both with nitrous oxide and oxygen (30%). The patients breathed spontaneously using a non-rebreathing circuit. Patients given propofol infusion became re-orientated faster (11.0 +/- 5.5 min vs. 16.5 +/- 7.5 min; P less than 0.01) and at 30 min walked along a straight line better (P less than 0.01). At 60 min, none of the propofol patients displayed an unsteady gait, whereas 11 of the 25 isoflurane patients did (P less than 0.001). None of the patients receiving propofol had emesis at the clinic, compared with 10 of the 25 patients receiving isoflurane (P less than 0.001). The overall incidence of emesis was 2 of 25 and 14 of 25 in the propofol and isoflurane groups, respectively (P less than 0.01). Patients receiving propofol were discharged home earlier than patients receiving isoflurane (80 +/- 14 min and 102 +/- 32 min, respectively; P less than 0.01). It is concluded that propofol allows early discharge of patients, even after long anaesthesias.     

Induced hypotension for tympanoplasty: a comparison of desflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was designed to compare the effects of desflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane when combined with remifentanil for induced hypotension on surgical conditions and operative field during tympanoplasty. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing tympanoplasty were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized into three groups of 20 each to receive the inhalation anaesthetics desflurane, isoflurane or sevoflurane. Propofol 2 mg kg(-1) was administered for induction of anaesthesia in all groups. All patients received a continuous infusion of remifentanil which was titrated between 0.2 and 0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1) to achieve a mean blood pressure (BP) of 60-70 mmHg. Nitroglycerine was infused if this BP could not be achieved. Arterial pressures were recorded continuously throughout the operation. Surgical conditions were assessed every 20 min by the blinded surgeon using a six-point category scale (0-5). RESULTS: One patient in the desflurane group and two patients in isoflurane group required nitroglycerine to maintain desired mean BP. Sustained controlled hypotension was sufficient in all of the groups throughout surgery. Category scale scores were < or =3 throughout the study, except one patient in the sevoflurane group who had a score of 4 at the 60th minute of the operation. No difference was found among groups when haemodynamic parameters and surgical category scale scores were compared. There were no postoperative respiratory and circulatory complications. CONCLUSION: Desflurane, sevoflurane or isoflurane combined with remifentanil provided adequate induced hypotension and similar operating conditions and any of them could be safely and equally used in anaesthesia for tympanoplasty.