腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术与完全腹膜外疝修补术疗效对比的Meta分析

目的:对比腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)与完全腹膜外(totally extraperitoneal,TEP)腹股沟疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效。方法:计算机检索2000~2012年PubMed、EMbase、scifinder scholar、ovid fulltext数据库。检索语种为英语。纳入的随机或半随机对照试验为TAPP与TEP在成人患者中的临床效果比较,由两名工作人员分别提取数据,并对纳入的研究进行质量评估。最后采用RevMan 5.0软件进行统计分析并得出结论。结果:最终纳入7个试验,共包含1 999例患者。两种术式在手术时间[OR=0.90,95%CI(-5.31,7.11),P=0.78]、术后住院时间[OR=-0.08,95%CI(-1.22,1.07),P=0.90]、术后疼痛[OR=0.21,95%CI(-0.31,0.74),P=0.42]、远期复发率[OR=1.23,95%CI(0.53,2.87),P=0.63]、术后并发症发生率[OR=1.82,95%CI(0.83,4.01),P=0.14]方面差异均无统计学意义;但术后恢复工作时间[OR=3.83,95%CI(3.05,4.61),P<0.00001]差异有统计学意义。结论:TAPP与TEP均是治疗腹股沟疝安全、有效的术式,在术后恢复正常工作时间方面TEP优于TAPP,其他方面的区别尚需进一步研究。     

腹腔镜下不同术式治疗小儿腹股沟疝的临床对照研究

目的:探讨腹腔镜下不同术式治疗小儿腹股沟疝的临床疗效及医疗成本。方法:选择2013年3月至2014年5月90例腹股沟疝患儿,按照随机数字表法分为研究组与对照组,每组45例。研究组行腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术(totally extraperitoneal,TEP),对照组行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP),对比两组手术时间、术中出血量、医疗成本、住院时间等临床指标、术后并发症及复发情况。结果:两组下床活动时间、手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量等临床指标差异无统计学意义(P0.05);研究组医疗成本显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。研究组术后并发症发生率为4.4%,与对照组(6.7%)相比差异无统计学意义(P0.05);研究组复发率为8.9%,与对照组(11.1%)相比差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:小儿腹股沟疝行腹腔镜TEP与腹腔镜TAPP的临床效果无显著差异,但腹腔镜TEP医疗成本低,值得临床推广。     

3D高清腹腔镜在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的应用

目的 探讨3D高清腹腔镜下行经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)治疗成人原发性单侧腹股沟疝的临床效果。方法 选择2021年1月至2022年2月在我院行TAPP术的腹股沟疝患者,按随机数字表法随机分为两组：3D组45例,年龄22～81岁,左侧13例,右侧32例;斜疝37例,直疝3例,股疝3例,单侧直、斜复合疝2例;腹股沟疝分型：Ⅰ型9例,Ⅱ型30例,Ⅲ型6例;均采用3D腹腔镜系统行TAPP术。2D组49例,年龄23～88岁,左侧17例,右侧32例;斜疝42例,直疝3例,股疝2例,单侧直、斜复合疝2例;腹股沟疝分型：Ⅰ型12例,Ⅱ型32例,Ⅲ型5例;均采用2D腹腔镜系统行TAPP术。结果 两组患者性别、年龄、疝分型及类型等基线资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。围手术期相关指标比较,3D组手术时间、补片放置时间、腹膜缝合时间均少于2D组(P<0.05),而两组术中出血量、术后住院时间、住院总费用比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后3D组出现血清肿2例,切口感染1例,肺部感染2例,2D组出现血清肿2例,切口感染及肺部感染各1例,两组并发症发生率比较无统计...     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的术后疼痛分析

目的:探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)治疗腹股沟疝术后疼痛的原因及治疗方法。方法:回顾分析2009年5月至2015年2月为1 036例患者行TAPP的临床资料,总结分析患者年龄、手术时期、钉枪固定等指标。结果:1 036例均顺利完成TAPP,无一例中转开腹。术后发生疼痛89例,发生率8.6%。不同手术时期、应用钉枪钉合与免钉合术后疼痛差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。不同年龄、U形钉与螺旋钉固定TAPP术后疼痛差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:手术标准化是减少或避免TAPP术后疼痛的根本方法,必要的心理安慰、合适的治疗方式是治疗的关键。     

经腹探查改良全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术

目的探讨经腹探查改良腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术式（total extraperitoneal repair，TEP）的可行性和优越性。方法从2003年10月至2004年6月，完成了传统TEP术60例。从2004年7月至2007年8月对160例腹股沟疝患者实施了经腹探查改良TEP（即手术开始先行经腹探查）。按术中是否经腹探查分为传统TEP组和改良TEP组。登记患者年龄、性别，记录术中发现对侧隐匿性腹外疝例次、术中漏气与否（是否需要Verres针排放腹腔气体）、术后住院天数、术后恢复日常活动天数以及术后复发情况。结果改良TEP组160例诊断出40例隐匿性腹外疝，包括32例腹股沟疝，8例股疝，而传统TEP组60例中仅发现4例隐匿性腹股沟疝。两组对隐匿性腹外疝的检出比例分别为25％和6．67％，经检验x2=9．167，P〈0．05；比较两组漏气入腹的发生比例19．4％和16．7％，检验x2=0．127，P〉0．05，比较两组患者术后住院天数、恢复日常活动天数，经t检验，P值均〉0．05；改良TEP组回纳经体外不能回纳的大网膜14例，联合行腹腔镜胆囊切除术4例，腹腔镜阑尾切除术3例，与泌尿外科合作同期切除同侧隐睾5例，精索鞘膜积液切除和前列腺电切各1例。传统TEP组有2例复发，腹股沟斜疝和直疝各1例，均位于对侧。结论经腹探查加传统TEP术式是可行的，改良TEP提高了传统TEP术式的效果，扩展了TEP的手术适应症，使TEP联合其它常见腹部外科腹腔镜手术得以实现。     

腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的临床体会（附312例报告）

目的：总结腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术（totally extraperitoneal,TEP）治疗腹股沟疝的临床经验,探讨其可行性及临床应用价值。方法：分析2009年1月至2014年1月为312例患者行TEP的临床资料,其中男297例,女15例,平均（58.8±27.5）岁。均为原发疝,无复发疝及嵌顿疝,其中单侧284例,双侧28例,包括斜疝268例、直疝33例、复合疝14例。结果：312例患者均顺利完成手术,无中转开放手术及经腹腹膜前疝修补术,术中无大血管、神经损伤,术后36例出现不同程度的血清肿,13例出现尿潴留,2例复发。手术时间单侧平均（48.4±21.3）min,双侧平均（81.4±40.6）min,术后疼痛时间平均（0.8±0.5）d,术后平均住院（2.4±1.2）d。平均随访（18.2±14.7）个月,未发生慢性疼痛、阴囊血肿、睾丸缺血坏死、网片感染等并发症。结论：TEP具有患者创伤小、康复快、疼痛轻、并发症少、复发率低等优点,安全可行,值得临床推广与应用。     

腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝

目的探讨腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的效果。方法选取2016-01—2018-10间收治的121例成人腹股沟疝患者,按手术方式的不同分为2组。对照组(60例)行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP),观察组(61例)实施腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)。比较2组的疗效。结果观察组术中失血量少于对照组,手术时间、住院时间、术后肛门恢复排气时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);2组并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。随访6个月,2组患者均未出现复发病例。结论 TAPP和TEP治疗成人腹股沟疝均有确切效果,其中TEP创伤小,有利于患者术后恢复。     

腹腔镜全腹膜外与经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的临床对比研究

目的比较腹腔镜全腹膜外（TEP）与经腹腹膜前（TAPP）腹股沟疝修补术的可行性、安全性及有效性。方法回顾性分析2010年3月至2013年10月期间于笔者所在医院行腹腔镜TEP疝修补术（TEP组）和腹腔镜TAPP疝修补术（TAPP组）的95例腹股沟疝患者的临床资料和手术资料,比较TEP组和TAPP组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、手术费用、术后并发症发生情况等。结果所有患者的手术均获成功,无中转开放手术病例。TEP组与TAPP组患者的手术时间[（65±16）min比（68±17）mini、术中出血量[（7．0±1．2）mL比（8．0±1．4）mL3、术后疼痛分数[（2．0±1．1）分比（1．8±1．1）分]、术后住院时间（（3．1±1．4）d比（3．3±1．2）d]及恢复正常活动时间[（4．2±1．0）d比（4．5±1．2）d]比较差异均无统计学意义∽〉0．05）;TEP组和TAPP组的手术费用分别为（8033＋536）元和（9632＋643）元,TAPP组较高（P=O．007）。术后发生并发症6例（6．3％,6／95）,2组各3例,包括阴囊血（清）肿3例、暂时性感觉神经障碍1例,尿潴留2例,2组并发症发生率比较差异也无统计学意义（P=1．000）。所有患者均获访,随访时间为1～35个月、（20．0±10．2）个月,无复发及慢性疼痛发生。结论TEP与TAPP疝修补术均是可行、安全及有效的术式,各有其优缺点,两者在手术并发症方面无明显差别。     

完全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的护理体会

<正>腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术因具有患者创伤小、疼痛轻、术后并发症发生率低、住院时间短、切口小、美容效果好等优点,已逐渐得到普及。围手术期护理对整个治疗过程具有重要意义,严谨的护理可保证医嘱完整准确的执行,细致入微的护理也可在心理上给予患者莫大的关怀与鼓励,从而提高患者的依从性;同时,术后随访可预防或减少术后并发症的发生。现将我院完全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的围手术期护理体会报道如下。     

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术132例临床分析

目的:总结腹腔镜疝修补术的手术经验及技巧.方法:回顾分析2005年1月至2010年12月为132例、140例次施行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的临床资料.结果:3例手术由完全腹膜外疝修补术中转为经腹膜前疝修补术,无一例中转开放手术.术后平均住院(5±2.3)d,经腹腹膜前疝修补术和全腹膜外疝修补术手术时间分别为(57.1±18...     

成人腹股沟复发疝无张力修补术136例体会

目的总结采用国产平片、网塞、善愈补片等修补成人腹股沟复发疝的临床经验和方法,探讨成人腹股沟复发疝的无张力修补术的“区域化”、“个体化”手术方法。方法回顾性分析我院2001年12月至2008年12月间136例成人腹股沟复发疝的手术方法、围手术期处理、术后并发症等资料。结果136例中除l例术后半年复发再次手术成功外,其余均一次手术成功。结论对于成人腹股沟复发疝应根据每位病人局部复发疝的解剖特点,选择不同修补材料,应用“个体化”修补方法,可以取得满意疗效。     

经腹腔腹膜前补片腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术170例报告

目的:探讨经腹腔腹膜前补片腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)治疗腹股沟疝的方法与经验。方法:1995年6月~2005年7月应用TAPP治疗170例腹股沟疝,采用网状补片常规固定、腹膜常规连续缝合关闭等方法。结果:170例手术均获成功,无中转开放手术,平均手术时间52.5(40~120)m in,术后平均住院4.5d。术后随访1~11年,1例直疝复发。结论:TAPP是一种安全可靠的疝修补术,具有复发率低等优点,特别适于复发疝、双侧疝等,值得推广应用。     

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术463例分析

目的 评价腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的安全性和有效性.方法 分析2001年1月至2007年8月行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的463例(534例次)患者的临床资料,其中IPOM4例(4例次),TAPP192例(219例次),TEP267例(311例次),随访时间2～36个月(中位时间19个月).结果 手术无中转,术后复发率为0.37%(2/534),前3位并发症依此为血清肿5.24%(28/534),暂时性神经感觉异常3.93%(21/534)和尿潴留2.25%(12/534),III型、IV形腹股沟疝的术后并发症率高于I型、II型腹股沟疝;平均手术时间为(43.3±14.2) min(20～140 min),术后平均住院天数为(3.3±1.2)d,2周和4周内恢复非限制性活动人数分别为97.4%(451/463)和100%,术后无需应用镇痛剂.结论 LIHR是安全有效的无张力修补方法,手术效果以及术式选择取决于术者的临床经验.     

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术36例分析

目的 探讨腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的优点手术技巧及疗效.方法 2007-07～2009-07行腹腔镜经腹膜前补片植入术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)和伞腹膜外补片植入(totally extrperitoneal,TEP)共36例,其中腹股沟斜疝28例,腹股沟直疝5例,复合疝3例.结...     

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: review of 6 years experience

Since 6 years, the totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair has become our procedure of choice to manage inguinal hernia in adult patients, especially for bilateral hernias and recurrences after classical anterior repair. Between March 1993 and March 1999, 976 patients underwent 1259 hernia repairs by an endoscopic total extraperitoneal approach. A large polypropylene prosthesis (15 x 15 cm) is placed and covers all potential defects. Follow-up on patients ranged from 6 to 79 months (mean, 39 months). Per- and postoperative morbidity and complications were acceptable (8.4%) and included conversion to open surgery (0.4%), bleedings (0.3%), urinary retention (4.2%), seromas (2.7%), neuralgias (0.2%), vague persistent groin discomfort (0.4%), orchitis (0.08%) and sigmoido-cutaneous fistula (0.08%). Recurrence rate so far is 0.1%. This retrospective study shows that the totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia should have a promising future because of low morbidity and low recurrence rate.     

单侧复发性腹股沟疝腔镜下修补的临床分析

目的探讨单侧复发性腹股沟疝腔镜下修补术的临床体会。 方法回顾性分析2009年1月至2019年1月,福建医科大学附属第一医院收治的123例腔镜下修补单侧复发性腹股沟疝患者的临床资料。通过手术时间、有无中转手术、发生副损伤、术后第1天疼痛评分、术后住院时间、术后并发症发生情况,分析腔镜修补单侧复发性腹股沟疝的临床效果。 结果123例单侧复发性腹股沟疝患者,采用腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术（TEP）患者54例,采用腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）患者59例,采用腹腔内修补术（IPOM）患者10例。平均手术时间（50.68±9.46）min,术后第1天视觉模拟疼痛评分（2.19±1.76）分,术后住院时间（2.25±1.40）d。术后累计并发症患者12例（9.76%）,均治愈出院,随访时间内无复发。 结论腔镜修补手术（TEP、TAPP及IPOM）是治疗复发性腹股沟疝安全有效的方法,可以在有条件的单位开展。     

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Background: Despite numerous attempts to improve the techniques used for hernia repair, current published series show that recurrence rates are as high as 5-20%. The complexity of inguinal anatomy, combined with multiple potential areas of weakness, has contributed to the difficulty in preventing recurrences. However, the laparoscopic approach to inguinal herniorrhaphy has allowed clear visualization of all preperitoneal fascial planes and anatomic landmarks, as well as the hernia defect(s) and the peritoneal reflection. In the course of our performance of a series of 1,224 laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs, we have developed a total extraperitoneal approach that yields excellent results with a low initial recurrence rate. Herein we describe our experience. Methods: After our initial 300 transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repairs, which resulted in six recurrences, two bowel injuries, one bladder injury, and six cutaneous nerve injuries, the total extraperitoneal approach (TEP) was adopted. Results: The first 300 TEP repairs resulted in one recurrence, two bowel injuries, one bladder injury, and two cutaneous nerve injuries. All major complications occurred in patients who had had previous lower abdominal surgery. In the last 624 TEP herniorrhaphies we implemented some modifications to the technique, especially for patients with previous lower abdominal surgery. In this group we recorded one bladder injury, no cutaneous nerve injuries, and one recurrence. Conclusions: The total extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy allows for a safe and effective repair with low rates of complication and recurrence. A thorough knowledge of the anatomy of the extraperitoneal space and especially the two- and three-dimensional inguinal anatomy of this space contributed greatly to the evolution of our technique.     

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

As a consequence of the development of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the late 1980s, diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy has now become an integral part of the average general surgeon's practice. Many conventional operations have been successfully adapted for the laparoscopic approach. A laparoscopic operation is unquestionably the surgical procedure of choice for gastroesophageal reflux disease and removal of the gallbladder, spleen, or adrenal gland unless specific contraindications are present. However, the value of laparoscopic techniques for other operations remains controversial within the surgical community. Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy (LIH) is a case in point. Frequent reanalysis of the controversial procedures such as laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is especially important because videoscopic operations remain in their developmental stages and thus continue to evolve. With this in mind, the purpose of this review was to examine the current state of the art of laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy in relationship to its conventional counterparts.     

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Background: We performed a prospective study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hernia repair in our hospital. Methods: A total of 2500 consecutive laparoscopic transabdominal hernia repairs (TAPP) were performed in 1952 patients. Their average age was 59 years. We used a mesh. 12 × 15cm. Results: The average operating time was 32 mins. We had a recurrence rate of 1.04%. There were 89 complications (3.56%). Three were bladder injuries, one of which necessitated conversion to an open laparotomy. Three of 38 hematomas required open exploration. Three patients were reoperated because of nerve irritation. An incarcerated trocar hernia occurred in six cases. There was one wound infection at the umbilical incision. There were no infections or incompatibility reactions at the mesh. The complication rate declined over time. At the same time, the rate of recurrence decreased as we acquired more experience in laparoscopic hernia repair. Conclusion: Laparoscopic hernia repair can be performed safely, with low rates of recurrences and few complications are low. This technique achieves good results combined with the benefits of minimal invasive procedures. apd: 13 March 2001