Results of screening with the brief headache screen compared with a modified IDMigraine.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic migraine and chronic daily headache syndromes have greater morbidity than patients with episodic migraine, and are less frequently diagnosed. A screening tool which identifies daily headache syndromes as well as migraine would promote more patients receiving appropriate treatment, including prophylaxis. METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of data obtained to evaluate the prevalence of somatic symptoms in primary care patients was conducted on a convenience sample of primary care patients who completed the Patient Health Questionnaire portion of the PRIME-MD (Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders). Patients who endorsed the symptom of headache were asked to complete the Brief Headache Screen (BHS), a 4-item screening tool, supplemented by 3 clinical questions (nausea, light sensitivity, and noise sensitivity). The data obtained allowed a post-hoc comparison of the BHS with a modified version of the screening tool, IDMigraine(TM) (IDM(TM)). Diagnostic interviews were performed on patients whose diagnoses differed by the 2 screening methods, and on patients who screened positive for daily headache on BHS. RESULTS: Of the 1000 patients who completed the PRIME-MD, 302 (30.2%) indicated headache as a concern, and there were sufficient data for both the BHS and IDM(TM) for 259. There was substantial concordance between the 2 instruments with 82.6% agreement in identified migraine (95% confidence interval: 77.8%-87.4%). The BHS screened positive for migraine in an additional 15.1% of patients who were not identified by IDM(TM), whereas the IDM(TM) identified an additional 2.3% of patients. Of the 173 which both tools recognized as migraine, the BHS identified 42.8% as having a daily headache syndrome (chronic migraine: 23.1%; episodic migraine + chronic tension-type headache [CTTH]: 19.7%). BHS also identified 7 non-migraine patients as having CTTH alone. Diagnostic interviews confirmed that 6/18 (33%) of BHS+ but IDM-, and one of 2 (50%) patients BHS-/IDM+ met full criteria for migraine. Additionally, interviews confirmed the diagnoses of 85.4% of those patients who the BHS identified with daily headache and 67% of those who were identified as medication overuse headache. CONCLUSION: The BHS and a modified IDM(TM) are concordant in screening for migraine in 82.6% of a primary care population who endorsed the symptom of headache. However, the BHS screens effectively not only for migraine but also for chronic daily headache and medication overuse. A screening paradigm based on headache frequency and the frequency of medication use can rapidly and sensitively identify migraine, daily headache syndromes, and medication overuse. This paradigm may improve clinical care by identifying patients who merit preventive as well as acute therapy for migraine.     

Chronic daily headache. How should it be included in the IHS classification?

A number of patients attending specialty headache centers complain of very frequent, almost continuous or continuous headaches, which are usually grouped together under the term chronic daily headache , a category which does not appear in the International Headache Society (IHS) classification. On the basis of the IHS criteria, these patients can only be classified as having a chronic tension-type headache with the possible addition of migraine, if migrainous attacks are superimposed on the "background" headache. However, several studies have demonstrated that most patients with chronic daily headache originally suffered from migraine and that their migraine has transformed, in the course of time, into a chronic headache picture in which isolated migraine attacks may or may not persist. Despite some differences in the personal opinions of authors involved in the care of patients with chronic daily headache, some views seem to be generally accepted: (1) the great majority of chronic daily headaches are transformations of an original episodic migraine and cannot be included in the chronic tension-type headache category, (2) the current IHS classification does not allow many patients presenting with chronic daily headache to be classified correctly, (3) an important nosological category (transformed migraine) has emerged from all the studies on this subject, (4) it is impossible to diagnose transformed migraine merely by "photographing" the picture of single attacks. Although some theoretical problems remain unresolved, it seems to us that the next revision of the IHS classification can no longer ignore the existence of chronic daily headache.     

Rapid and sensitive paradigm for screening patients with headache in primary care settings

OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a brief headache screening paradigm for primary care clinicians. BACKGROUND: Migraine and drug rebound headache are disabling primary headache disorders. Both are underdiagnosed and undertreated. A method for rapid screening of migraine, drug rebound headache, and other daily headache syndromes would be useful. The Brief Headache Screen uses 3 questions-the frequency of severe (disabling) headache, other (mild) headache, and use of symptomatic medication-to generate diagnoses. METHODS: The Brief Headache Screen was evaluated in an emergency department, a family practice department, and a referral headache clinic. Diagnoses from the Brief Headache Screen were compared to diagnoses of trained researchers and headache specialists. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-nine patients were screened and interviewed. The criterion of episodic severe (disabling) headache correctly identified migraine in 136 (93%) of 146 patients with episodic migraine and 154 (78%) of 197 patients with chronic migraine, with a specificity for any migraine (episodic or chronic) of 32 (63%) of 51. The inclusion of episodic or daily severe headache identified migraine in 100% of patients with chronic migraine. Only 6 (1.7%) of 343 patients with migraine were not identified by severe (disabling) headache. The combination of severe and mild headache frequency was sensitive to daily headache syndromes in 218 (94%) of 232 patients with a specificity of 87 (54%) of 162. Medication overuse was correctly identified in 146 (86%) of 169 patients with a specificity of 22 (79%) of 28. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of severe (disabling) and mild headaches and use of symptomatic medications, rapidly and sensitively screens for migraine, daily headache syndromes, and medication overuse. The use of this paradigm in primary care settings may improve the recognition of these important headache syndromes.     

Quality of life of patients with cervicogenic headache: a comparison with control subjects and patients with migraine or tension-type headache

OBJECTIVE: To establish the health-related quality of life of patients with cervicogenic headache and to compare it with a random Dutch sample of control subjects and with patients with migraine without aura or with episodic tension-type headache. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with cervicogenic headache, 42 patients with episodic tension-type headache, and 39 patients with migraine without aura completed a Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form questionnaire. RESULTS: Domain scores for "physical functioning" of patients with cervicogenic headache were worse than those of patients with migraine or tension-type headache. Physical functioning scores were lower for patients with tension-type headache than for those with migraine. Migraineurs reported a diminished score for "social functioning" compared to patients with tension-type headache. All Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form domain scores were significantly lower for patients with cervicogenic headache relative to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cervicogenic headache have a quality of life burden that is substantial. Although impairment in the quality of life of patients with cervicogenic headache is comparable to patients with migraine without aura and those with episodic tension-type headache, there are some specific differences.     

Specificity and Sensitivity of Temporalis ES2 Measurements in the Diagnosis of Chronic Primary Headaches

We have evaluated the specificity and sensitivity of temporalis ES2 measurements for the diagnosis of primary headaches. Ninety-four outpatients diagnosed according to IHS criteria were prospectively included: 25 had chronic tension-type headache (code 2.2.), 15 episodic tension-type headache (code 2.1.), 20 migraine without aura (code 1.1.) and 34 chronic daily headaches with daily analgesics/ergotamine abuse (code 8.2.). In chronic tension-type, the sensitivity of the ES2 test was 84% at the 0.1 and the 0.5 Hz, but only 56% at the 2Hz stimulation rates. Its specificity was 100% at 0.1Hz, 90% at 0.5Hz and 95% at 2Hz compared to migraine; positive predictive values were at similar levels. Sensitivity of ES2 at 0.1 Hz was 67% in episodic tension-type headache, but its positive predictive value versus migraine was excellent. Comparing chronic tension-type headache and analgesic abusers, the specificity and positive predictive value of the ES2 test for diagnosing chronic tension-type headache were less satisfactory (60%) while the negative predictive values, however, remained good (83% at 0.1Hz).
The results confirm that the temporalis ES2 test has a higher diagnostic sensitivity in chronic and episodic tension-type headache, but that it has a high negative predictive value for both types of tension-type headache compared to other primary headaches. For diagnostic purposes, the 0.1Hz stimulation rate seems optimal. The 2Hz stimulation rate is the least sensitive, although it may induce total disappearance of ES2 in up to 40% of patients. ES2 is of limited usefulness for separating chronic tension-type headache and chronic drug-abuse headache, possibly because the latter group comprises both tension-type headache and migraine patients.     

Chronische Migr?ne und Kopfschmerz bei Medikamenten��bergebrauch

The first International classification of headache disorders (ICHD-I) described migraine as a recurring headache disorder manifesting in attacks lasting 4-72 h. The headache frequency was not considered in these first diagnostic criteria of migraine. Thus, a chronic migraine with at least 15 migraine days per month was only included in the ICHD-II in 2004. Meanwhile, the diagnosis of chronic daily headache and transformed migraine had been established in the USA. The term transformed migraine describes the transformation of an episodic migraine into a chronic one, whether medication overuse had been present or not. Up till now a widely accepted definition of chronic migraine and medication overuse headache has not been established due to different views. An overview of the evolution of the diagnostic criteria for both headache disorders in recent years is provided.     

Diagnosis,epidemiology, and impact of tension-type headache

Although tension-type headache is the most prevalent headache and affects 78% of the general population, the substantial societal and individual burden associated with this primary headache has been overlooked. In contrast to migraine headache, there has been limited focus on tensiontype headache. Most patients with the chronic form of tension-type headache, which affects 3% of the population, are left virtually without any specific treatment. Chronic tensiontype headache differs from the episodic form in frequency, lack of effect to most treatment strategies, more medication overuse, and more loss of quality of life. Daily or near daily headaches also constitute a major diagnostic and therapeutic problem and distinguishing chronic tension-type headache from migraine headache and from medication-induced headache is a substantial diagnostic challenge because management strategies are completely different. Considerable benefits for the society can be gained by specific strategies leading to reductions in the amount of sickness absence and impaired working abilities. The burden on the affected patients’ and their families’ quality of life also may be improved by a general acceptance of the disorder and by the development of a specific treatment strategy.     

Validation of a guideline-based decision support system for the diagnosis of primary headache disorders based on ICHD-3 beta

Background

China may have the largest population of headache sufferers and therefore the most serious burden of disease worldwide. However, the rate of diagnosis for headache disorders is extremely low, possibly due to the relative complexity of headache subtypes and diagnostic criteria. The use of computerized clinical decision support systems (CDSS) seems to be a better choice to solve this problem.

Methods

We developed a headache CDSS based on ICHD-3 beta and validated it in a prospective study that included 543 headache patients from the International Headache Center at the Chinese PLA General hospital, Beijing, China.

Results

We found that the CDSS correctly recognized 159/160 (99.4%) of migraine without aura, 36/36 (100%) of migraine with aura, 20/21 (95.2%) of chronic migraine, and 37/59 (62.7%) of probable migraine. This system also correctly identified 157/180 (87.2%) of patients with tension-type headache (TTH), of which infrequent episodic TTH was diagnosed in 12/13 (92.3%), frequent episodic TTH was diagnosed in 99/101 (98.0%), chronic TTH in 18/20 (90.0%), and probable TTH in 28/46 (60.9%). The correct diagnostic rates of cluster headache and new daily persistent headache (NDPH) were 90.0% and 100%, respectively. In addition, the system recognized 32/32 (100%) of patients with medication overuse headache.

Conclusions

With high diagnostic accuracy for most of the primary and some types of secondary headaches, this system can be expected to help general practitioners at primary hospitals improve diagnostic accuracy and thereby reduce the burden of headache in China.     

Primary chronic daily headache: clinical and pharmacological aspects. A clinic-based study in Oman

This study on primary chronic daily headache was based on the 1996 proposed revision of the diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society (IHS). To investigate the relative frequency, clinical characteristics, and associated features of primary chronic daily headache in Omani patients, 171 patients visiting the Neurology Clinic at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital were evaluated. Forty-five percent was diagnosed as suffering from primary chronic daily headache (female to male ratio, 1.7:1). Sixty-two percent suffered from transformed migraine and 34% from chronic tension-type headache. The average age across sexes was 32.3 +/- 12.3 years. A dull heavy feeling in the head was reported by 58% of patients and was associated in less than one third with associated features characteristic of migraine. All headache types shared the same trigger factors. All patients were taking medication, predominantly analgesics, at the time of their first visit. We concluded that primary chronic daily headache is very common with the relative frequency of transformed migraine being similar to that found in Mediterranean studies. Also in Oman, chronic use/overuse of analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is a problem that coexists with primary chronic daily headache. Finally, the proposed revised IHS criteria are highly recommended as a standard classification system for this type of headache.     

Opiate use to control bowel motility may induce chronic daily headache in patients with migraine

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether opiate overuse might cause chronic daily headache in those with migraine, we studied patients who were taking codeine (or other opiates) for control of bowel motility after colectomy for ulcerative colitis. BACKGROUND: Analgesic overuse is considered by many to be one factor which can result in the transformation of migraine into a chronic daily headache pattern. Most of the evidence for this comes from patients with migraine who are taking increasing amounts of analgesia for headache. Many of these patients revert to an intermittent migraine pattern once the analgesics are stopped. METHODS: Women who were 1 year postcolectomy for ulcerative colitis were identified in several colorectal surgery practices in Calgary. They were sent a questionnaire designed to determine if they had a history of migraine prior to surgery, if they currently had chronic daily headache, what medications they were taking to control bowel motility, and what medications they were taking for headache. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients who met our inclusion criteria returned completed questionnaires. Eight of these exceeded the recommended limits for opiate use in patients with headache. Eight patients met diagnostic criteria for migraine. Two patients had chronic daily headache starting after surgery. Both used daily opiates beginning after their surgery, and both had a history of migraine. The other six patients who used opiates daily did not have a history of migraine and did not have chronic daily headache. All patients with migraine who used daily opiates to control bowel motility following surgery developed chronic daily headache after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with migraine who use daily opiates for any reason are at high risk of developing transformed migraine with chronic daily headache. This risk appears much lower in patients without a history of migraine who use opiates for nonpain indications.     

Headache induced by chronic substance use: analysis of medication overused and minimum dose required to induce headache

BACKGROUND: The International Headache Society has defined the diagnostic criteria for headache induced by substance use. Recently, a revision to these criteria has been proposed. OBJECTIVE: To consider whether the International Headache Society criteria for headache induced by substance use and the proposed revisions for the classification of daily and near-daily headache with medication abuse permit classification of patients commonly seen in a headache center. METHODS: One hundred fourteen consecutive patients (96 women [84.2%] and 18 men [15.8%]; mean age, 54.2 years [SD, 14]) with headache and chronic overuse of medications, admitted for detoxification to the inpatient unit of a headache center, participated in the study. The initial headache, medications and doses used, duration of daily medication use, and means of medication administration were studied. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients (71%) had an initial headache of migraine without aura, 13 patients (11.4%) had migraine without aura and coexistent tension-type headache, 11 (9.7%) patients had migraine with and without aura, and 9 patients (7.9%) had episodic tension-type headache. Medications overused by patients included analgesics combined with barbiturates or other nonnarcotic substances in 39.5%, simple analgesics in 38.6%, triptans in 11.4%, and ergotamine in 10.5%. Using the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria, we were able to classify only 28.1% of our patients; the proposed revised criteria for daily and near-daily headaches with medication abuse permitted the classification of 46.4% of patients. CONCLUSION: The minimum dose of medication required to induce chronic headache should be revised because a high proportion of patients are not classifiable using either the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria or the revised criteria recently proposed. A more comprehensive definition for the required minimum dose might be used. Triptan abuse can cause chronic headache and should be included in the International Headache Society classification.     

American Headache Society members' assessment of headache diagnostic criteria

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the views of physicians interested in headache as to the diagnosis of the most commonly occurring and currently controversial headaches. BACKGROUND: The International Headache Society (IHS) classification system has received wide professional endorsement and considerable empirical support, but in the United States, their adoption by clinicians may be proceeding more slowly. Questions remain, including what diagnostic criteria for migraine and tension-type headache clinicians may continue to favor over those outlined by the IHS, to what extent is the "transformed migraine" diagnosis used in clinical practice, and how is analgesic rebound headache diagnosed with regard to the various quantitative measures of analgesic use. METHODS: Members of the American Headache Society rated the importance of IHS and non-IHS diagnostic criteria for migraine and tension-type headache and for analgesic rebound headache. Respondents also described their use of the proposed transformed migraine diagnosis. RESULTS: Two-thirds (67.3%) of the respondents reported use of the IHS criteria or the IHS criteria in conjunction with clinical judgment. For migraine and tension-type headache, IHS criteria were rated with high importance, but some respondents reported using additional non-IHS diagnostic criteria and de-emphasizing certain IHS criteria. For chronic headache, almost two-thirds (63%) of respondents reported using the transformed migraine diagnosis. For analgesic rebound headache, respondents preferred to make the diagnosis based on medication consumption that is lower than amounts stipulated in the IHS classification system. CONCLUSIONS: There remains a number of physicians interested in headache who do not use the IHS classification system, who modify the IHS criteria in practice, and who use the "transformed migraine" diagnosis for patients with chronic daily headache.     

Determinants of tension-type headache in children

The objective of this study was to study the prevalence, characteristics and predisposing factors of tension-type headache in children. An unselected population-based questionnaire study was carried out in 1409 Finnish schoolchildren aged 12 years. Of them, 1135 (81%) returned an acceptably completed questionnaire. The prevalence of episodic tension-type headache in children was 12% (138 of 1135). Children with episodic tension-type headache also often reported characteristics of pain typical for migraine. Children with frequent and persistent episodic tension-type headache reported stabbing and severe occipital pain, phonophobia and abdominal pain significantly more often than children with infrequent episodic tension-type headache. Neck-shoulder symptoms, symptoms of depression and oromandibular dysfunction were each independently associated with episodic tension-type headache. The father's occupation of a lower-level white-collar worker put the child at a four-fold risk for episodic tension-type headache. We conclude that episodic tension-type headache is as common as migraine in children. It can be associated with depression, oromandibular dysfunction and muscular stress. Especially children with frequent and persistent episodic tension-type headache report characteristics of pain typical for migraine.     

Osmophobia in juvenile primary headaches

This study was planned to investigate the prevalence of osmophobia in juvenile headache sufferers and to analyse the diagnostic utility of osmophobia in order to distinguish migraine without aura from episodic tension-type headache. We examined 305 consecutive patients presenting at our Paediatric Headache Centre. A semistructured questionnaire was given to 275 selected patients affected by migraine or tension-type headache. The prevalence of osmophobia during attacks was 18.5%, mainly in migraine patients (25.1%) vs. those with tension-type headache (8.3%). Osmophobia showed more specificity than phonophobia or photophobia in the differential diagnosis between migraine and tension-type headache. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that osmophobia resulted in a symptom with poor sensitivity (27.1%) but high specificity (92%) that could become a supportive diagnostic criterion even in children for the differential diagnosis between migraine without aura and tension-type headache.     

A community-based study of headache diagnosis and prevalence in Singapore

We present the results of a community survey based on the diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society (IHS) describing headache prevalence and symptomatology in the Singapore population. A questionnaire administered by trained personnel was completed by 2096 individuals from a randomized sample of 1400 households. The overall lifetime prevalence of headache was 82.7%. The migraine prevalence was 2.4% in males and 3.6% in females; for episodic tension-type headache and chronic tension-type headache the corresponding figures were 11.1%/11.8% and 0.9%/1.8%, respectively. Inclusion of borderline cases (IHS codes 1.7 and 2.3) resulted in prevalences of 9.3% for migraine, 39.9% for episodic tension headache and 2.4% for chronic tension headache. Headaches described by 31.2% of the respondents were unclassifiable. The different premonitory symptoms, precipitants and aggravating factors in migraine and tension-type headache in our study population suggest that they represent two distinct syndromes rather than opposite ends of a clinical spectrum.     

Intravenous valproate sodium in the treatment of daily headache

BACKGROUND: Treatment of chronic daily headache/transformed migraine is challenging, especially when it is complicated by overuse of analgesics, triptans, or both. One common approach involves the use of repetitive intravenous dihydroergotamine. We investigated the use of intravenous valproate sodium in the treatment of chronic daily headache/transformed migraine in patients who had contraindications to the use of or had failed treatment with dihydroergotamine. METHODS: We administered intravenous valproate sodium (Depacon) to patients with chronic daily headache/transformed migraine (loading dose 15 mg/kg, followed by 5 mg/kg every 8 hours). All analgesics and triptans were discontinued prior to treatment with divalproex sodium, and preventative medications for migraine were begun or continued. All patients received instruction in behavioral modification and the proper use of analgesics and triptans. RESULTS: Improvement in headache was reported by 80% of the patients treated, and valproate sodium was tolerated well by most. CONCLUSION: Intravenous valproate sodium may be of assistance in the initial management of patients with chronic daily headache/transformed migraine and analgesic/triptan overuse, especially when dihydroergotamine is ineffective or contraindicated.     

Weekend headache: a retrospective study in migraine without aura and episodic tension-type headache

Our retrospective study was aimed at determining the existence of weekend headache and, if so, whether it has the same clinical features as migraine without aura and episodic tension-type headache, or whether it occurs as a separate form of headache which could find its own place in the International Headache Society classification.
For this study, we reviewed the clinical records of 120 patients with migraine without aura and 120 patients with episodic tension-type headache randomly selected among all those referred to the Headache Center of the University of Parma Institute of Neurology between 1985 and 1996.
A review of these records suggests that weekend headache exists for both types of headache considered. Clinically, it is interesting to note that the male-to-female ratio for the weekend form of tension-type headache was 1:1, as opposed to 1:3 for general episodic tension-type headache. As regards classification, no evidence so far seems to suggest that weekend headache should be considered as an independent entity. Apart from certain features that appear to be peculiar to this form of headache—such as increased pain intensity—it thoroughly fulfills the diagnostic criteria of the primary headaches from which it evolves. Finally, a few clinical features suggest that the weekend may simply be a triggering factor in migraine without aura attacks, while playing a major role in episodic tension-type headache. However, weekend headache is a clinical entity that clearly needs further study.     

Kaplan Award 1998. Epidemiology of chronic daily headache in the general population

Background and Objectives.—Although chronic daily headache, mainly transformed migraine, is an important reason for consultation in headache clinics, its actual prevalence is unknown. This study analyzes the prevalence of the different types of chronic daily headache in an unselected population.
Methods.—A questionnaire exploring headache frequency was distributed to 2252 unselected subjects. Those having headache 10 or more days per month were given a headache diary and were seen by a neurologist who classified their headaches. The varieties of chronic daily headache were classified according to the second revision of IHS criteria proposed by Silberstein et al published in Neurology 1996;47:871.
Results.—The questionnaire was returned by 1883 subjects (83.5%). One hundred thirty-five admitted to headache 10 or more days per month. Chronic daily headache criteria were fulfilled by 89 individuals (4.7%). Eighty were women. Forty-two (47.2% of subjects with chronic daily headache and 2.2% of all subjects) had chronic tension-type headache. Analgesic overuse was found in 8 (17%). Transformed migraine was diagnosed in 45 (50.6% of subjects with chronic daily headache and 2.4% of all subjects). Fourteen (31.1%) individuals with this form of chronic daily headache overused ergots or analgesics. The remaining 2 cases in this series met the criteria of new daily persistent headache. No one was diagnosed as having hemicrania continua.
Conclusions.—Almost 5% of the general population (9% of women) suffers from chronic daily headache, the proportion of chronic tension-type headache and transformed migraine being quite similar. Less than one third overuse analgesics. The prevalence of chronic daily headache subtypes shown here differs from data obtained from headache clinics, emphasizing that caution is needed in extrapolating data from specialized units to the general population.     

Chronic post-traumatic headache--a clinical analysis in relation to the International Headache Classification 2nd Edition

The clinical presentation of chronic post-traumatic headache in 53 patients from a highly specialized headache clinic was analysed and classified according to the diagnostic criteria of the primary headaches in The International Headache Classification 2nd Edition, and compared with the 1st Edition. All patients fulfilled the criteria for both editions indicating that the restrictions in the 2nd Edition have no major influence on the prevalence in specialized clinics. We found the phenomenology to be very heterogeneous, but the vast majority (77%) of patients presented with headache resembling chronic tension-type headache, either as the only manifestation or in combination with migraine symptoms. For the first time episodic tension-type headache is described as occurring after head trauma. The prevalence of coexisting analgesic overuse was 42% and the treatment outcome for these patients was just as favourable as in primary headaches, whereas the time-consuming multidisciplinary treatment demonstrated only very modest results.