Prevalence of the G1691A mutation in the factor V gene (factor V Leiden) and the G20210A prothrombin gene mutation in the Thai population

We investigated the prevalence of a genetic variation in the factor V gene (G1691A Leiden mutation) and the prothrombin gene (G20210A) using polymerase chain reaction techniques in samples from 500 normal Thai population and among 50 unselected Thai patients with an objectively confirmed history of deep venous thrombosis. The prevalence of factor V Leiden and the prothrombin G20210A gene mutation in a group of 500 healthy controls was 0.2% in both groups (allele frequency of 0.1%). Of the 50 adult patients studied, none was a carrier of factor V Leiden or the prothrombin G20210A gene mutation. Our findings confirm that the prevalence of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A gene mutation is lower among Asians than Caucasians and that the distribution of factor V Leiden is similar to that of the prothrombin G20210A variant. The low prevalence of these two mutations can, at least in part, account for the lower frequency of deep venous thrombosis reported in the Thai population. Screening for factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutation is of limited benefit and may not be cost-effective in Thai patients with the first episode of deep venous thrombosis.     

The frequency of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations in Slovak and Roma (Gypsy) ethnic group of Eastern Slovakia

Factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A are the two most prevalent causes of inherited thrombophilia. The prevalence of these mutations varies widely in healthy Caucasian population. The aim of our study was to determine the frequency of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations in Slovak and Roma ethnic group from Eastern Slovakia. We analyzed 540 asymptomatic individuals (269 individuals of Slovak ethnicity and 271 individuals of Roma ethnicity) by real-time PCR method. The detected allele frequencies were 2.97 versus 6.64?% for factor V Leiden (p?=?0.0049), and 0.74 versus 0.92?% for prothrombin mutation (p?=?0.7463) in Slovak and Roma population, respectively. The Roma ethnic group had significantly higher prevalence of factor V Leiden mutation when compared to Slovak ethnic group. The allele frequency of factor V Leiden in ethnic Romanies from Eastern Slovakia was one of the highest in Europe. Our results confirm an uneven geographical and ethnic distribution of factor V Leiden.     

Primary thrombophilia in Mexico. II. Factor V G1691A (Leiden), prothrombin G20210A, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism in thrombophilic Mexican mestizos.

We have shown that in Mexican mestizo patients with clinical features of primary thrombophilia, 39% have activated protein C resistance phenotype, 5% protein C deficiency, and 2% protein S deficiency. In the present study, in a group of 37 thrombophilic Mexicans and 50 normal controls, we assessed the factor V G1691A (Leiden), the prothrombin G20210A, and the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T gene polymorphisms. Four patients were found to be heterozygous for factor V Leiden, 5 heterozygous for the prothrombin 20210, 16 heterozygous, and 6 homozygous for the MTHFR 677. There were four individuals with co-segregation of alleles: two heterozygotes for the factor V Leiden/prothrombin 20210, one heterozygote for prothrombin 20210/MTHFR 677, and one heterozygote for prothrombin 20210/homozygote for MTHFR 677. For factor V Leiden, prothrombin 20210, and MTHFR 677 mutations, the allele frequencies were respectively 1% (+/-0.2%, alpha = 0.05), <1% and 51% (+/-5%, alpha = 0.05), with calculated relative risks for thrombosis of 5.94 (P = 0.08), >7.66 (P < 0.05), and 0.44 (P NS), respectively. In Mexican mestizo thrombophilic patients, the low prevalence of the factor V Leiden mutation (10.8%) and the high prevalence of the prothrombin 20210 mutation (13.5%) contrast with those identified in Caucasian thrombophilic patients (21% and 6%, respectively; P < 0.01). On the other hand, the high prevalence of the MTHFR 677 mutation gene both in normal controls (78%) and thrombophilic patients (61%) does not support a role of this mutation in the thrombogenesis of Mexican mestizo patients.     

Factor V Leiden G1691A, prothrombin G20210A, and MTHFR C677T mutations in Turkish inflammatory bowel disease patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk for thromboembolic complications. We investigated the incidence of factor V Leiden G1691A, methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T, and prothrombin G20210A mutation in 27 Turkish IBD patients with no history of thromboembolic disease. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-seven patients, 22 with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 5 with Crohn's disease (CD), and 47 healthy were included to the study. The DNAs were obtained from peripheral blood by using pure polymerase chain kit. Then, factor V Leiden G1691A, which active protein C resistance positive, prothrombin G20210A and MTHFR C677T mutations were investigated in DNA by using LightCycler-Factor V Leiden G1691A mutation, Prothrombin G20210A and MTHFR C677T estimate kits. RESULTS: The heterozygote factor V Leiden G1691A mutation was detected in 3 (11.1%) patients with IBD and 2 (4.3%) controls (p > 0.05). The homozygote factor V Leiden G1691A mutation was not estimated among patients and controls. Heterozygote prothrombin G20210A mutation was detected in 2 (7.4%) patients with IBD and in 0 (0%) controls (p > 0.05). There was no homozygote prothrombin G20210A mutation in IBD and controls. Heterozygote MTHFR C677T mutation was 10 of 27 (37%) patients with IBD while 15 of 47 (32%) controls (p > 0.05). Homozygote MTHFR C677T mutation was detected in 4 patients (14.9%) with IBD and 3 (6.3%) controls (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not reveal any association between IBD and the most common hereditary thrombophilic factors and these mutations interfere with neither disease manifestations nor the thrombotic complications.     

Prevalence of thrombotic risk factors among β-thalassemia patients from Western Iran

Background There is evidence for increased risk of thrombosis in patients with β-thalassemia intermedia and β-thalassemia major. The present study investigated the prevalence of thromboembolic risk factors of prothrombin G20210A, factor V Leiden G1691A and methylentetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T, as well as the hematological and clinical profiles in β-thalassemia major and intermedia patients from Western Iran. Methods Patients consisted of 158 β-thalassemia patients, 151 β-thalassemia major and 7 β-thalassemia intermedia patients, including 82 males and 76 females aged 13.6 ± 6.3 years. The control group were 180 healthy blood donors and school students, consisting of 103 males and 77 females aged 16.8 ± 2.1. Genotyping was done by PCR-RFLP using Mnl I, Hind III and Hinf I for factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A and MTHFR, respectively. Results The prevalence of prothrombin G20210A variant in patients and healthy individuals were 1.3 and 3.3%, respectively. Factor V Leiden G1691A was insignificantly higher in β-thalassemia patients (prevalence 5.7% and allele frequency 3.2%) compared to healthy individuals (2.8%). This mutation was found in eight β-thalassemia major (5.3%) and one β-thalassemia intermedia (14.3%) patients. The prevalence of MTHFR C677T polymorphism was slightly higher in patients (50%) compared to healthy individuals (48.3%). Around 71% of β-thalassemia intermedia and 38.4% of β-thalassemia major patients had undergone splenectomy. In β-thalassemia major patients, 5.3% had insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and 6.6% had HCV antibodies. All patients with IDDM were splenectomized and in one of them the prothrombin G20210A variant was found. Two patients, a 7-year-old boy with β-thalassemia intermedia receiving regularly blood transfusion and a β-thalassemia major patient (a 22-year-old splenectomized female), were found to be homozygous for MTHFR 677TT and heterozygous for factor V Leiden G1691A. Double heterozygosity for factor V Leiden G1691A and MTHFR C677T and also homozygous factor V Leiden 1691AA were found in two β-thalassemia major patients. No thromboembolic event has been recorded in the files of patients. Conclusions The results of present study establish the prevalence of biological risk factors of thrombosis in β-thalassemia patients from Western Iran. It seems that thrombophilic mutations may not be associated with thrombotic events in thalassemic patients, which needs to be confirmed by the study of larger sample sizes.     

Prevalence of factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, and MTHFR G677A among 594 thrombotic Jordanian patients.

Venous thromboembolism develops as the result of multiple interactions between non-genetic and genetic risk factors. In order to estimate the frequency of factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, and MTHFR C677T mutations in Jordanian thrombotic patients, we studied 594 patients admitted to the King Hussein Medical Center for thrombophilia assessment. Polymerase chain reaction detected 25.7% (20.7% heterozygous, 5% homozygous), 6% (5.8% heterozygous, 0.2% homozygous) and 31.7% (25% heterozygous, 6.7% homozygous) for factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A and MTHFR C677T mutations, respectively. A one-stage clotting assay was used to measure prothrombin activity. None of the prothrombin G20210A mutant patients had high prothrombin activity. The high prevalence found among our study group of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A confirms the importance of thrombophilia screening for patients with venous thrombosis with family history and those with additional risk factors. On the contrary, the high prevalence of the MTHFR C677T mutation among arterial thrombosis patients shows its importance in screening in arterial thrombosis patients. These results, which are close to the prevalence found by other studies in the region, suggests that the Eastern Mediterranean region is probably the area of origin of these mutations, especially factor V Leiden. The knowledge of these frequencies in the Middle East region through population-based studies will contribute to a better understanding of the interaction between genetic and environmental risk factors underlying the mentioned mutations.     

Factor V Leiden mutation and PAI-1 gene 4G/5G genotype in thrombotic patients with Behcet's disease.

Behcet's disease is a chronic systemic vasculitis with particular systemic features including thrombotic events. The present study was designed to analyse the role of the factor V Leiden and the prothrombin G20210A mutations and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 4G/5G polymorphism on the thrombotic risk of patients with Behcet's disease. A total of 50 unrelated patients with Behcet's disease (34 male, 16 female) were the subjects of the study. Twenty-seven of 50 patients with a history of thrombosis comprised group 1, and 23 patients with no thrombosis comprised group 2. In group 1, nine of the 27 patients (33%) were found to have the factor V Leiden mutation (7.1% in healthy population), and the 4G/4G genotype was found in 23% of the patients (26% in control). No patient had the prothrombin G20210A mutation (2.2% in healthy control). In group 2, two patients (9%) had the factor V Leiden and one patient (4%) had the prothrombin G20210A mutations. The 4G/4G polymorphism was found in 30.5% of the patients. The differences in the frequencies of factor V Leiden mutation between group 1 and group 2 (odds ratio, 5.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-27.5) and between group 1 and the healthy population were statistically significant ( 0.05). No statistically significant association was found for the prothrombin G20210A mutation and the 4G/5G genotype between the two groups or between each group and the healthy population, indicating that the prothrombin G20210A mutation and the 4G/4G polymorphism do not play a role in the development of thrombosis in Behcet's disease. These data suggested that the factor V Leiden mutation might be a risk factor for the development of thrombosis in Behcet's disease patients.     

Prevalence of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A in patients with gastric cancer

AIM: To analyze the prevalence of the two commonest thrombophilic mutations, factor V Leiden and prothrom-bin G20210A, in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one patients with primary gastric carcinoma and 130 healthy subjects, comparable for age and sex, were investigated. Factor V Leiden was detected by using polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme digestion, and prothrombin G20210A gene mutation by allele-specific PCR. RESULTS: Among the 121 cancer patients, factor V Leiden was found in 4 cases (GA genotype: 3.3%) and prothrombin G20210A in 10 cases (GA genotype: 8.3%). Of the 130 control subjects, factor V Leiden was detected in 6 cases (GA genotype: 4.6%) and prothrombin G20210A in 8 cases (GA genotype: 6.1%). No double heterozygous carriers of both mutations were found in either group. The prevalence of both factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A variant was not statistically different between the cancer patients and the healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that, in gastric cancer, the risk factors of thrombophilic cancer state are on acquired rather than on a genetic basis and that prothrombin G20210A does not seem to be a cofactor in gastric cancer pathogenesis.     

Prevalence of factor V Leiden and the G20210A prothrombin-gene mutation in inflammatory bowel disease.

A hypercoagulable state has been hypothesized as a contributing factor in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); moreover, such patients have an increased risk of thrombotic complications. The aim of the present paper was to study the prevalence of the two most important causes of inherited thrombophilia: factor V Leiden and the G20210A prothrombin-gene mutation in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Fifty-two patients affected by IBD (33 UC and 19 CD, 16 female and 36 male; mean age, 42 years) and 156 healthy controls (48 female and 108 male; mean age, 37 years) were studied. Seven out of 52 patients (13%) had previous thrombotic events. High molecular weight DNA was analysed for the presence of factor V Leiden and the G20210A prothrombin-gene mutation. One out of 52 IBD patients (1.9%) and three out of 156 control subjects (1.9%) were heterozygous for factor V Leiden. One IBD patient (1.9%) and four healthy controls (2.6%) were heterozygous for the prothrombin-gene mutation. The prevalence of the two mutations was similar in patients and controls. In the subgroup of IBD patients with previous thrombotic events, only one patient was heterozygous for the prothrombin-gene mutation. Factor V Leiden and the G20210A prothrombin-gene mutation do not seem to play a major role in the pathogenesis of IBD or be associated with an increased incidence of thrombotic complications, but with limited data.     

Risk of venous thrombosis in carriers of the prothrombin G20210A variant and factor V Leiden and their interaction with oral contraceptives

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The prothrombin G20210A mutation and factor V Leiden have been found to be associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis, but the reported prevalences of the prothrombin gene variant both in the normal population and in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) vary greatly in the literature. Moreover, the influence of oral contraceptives (OC) on thrombotic events in patients with the prothrombin G20210A variant has not been well established. In this study we evaluate both circumstances. DESIGN AND METHODS: A case-control study was run on 229 patients with DVT and 246 healthy controls. The patients' history of thrombosis and acquired thrombotic risk factors, especially OC, were recorded. Prothrombin G20210A mutation, factor V Leiden, antithrombin, heparin II cofactor, plasminogen and proteins C and S were evaluated. RESULTS: Seven and a half percent of the patients and 2.9% of the controls were carriers of the prothrombin mutation, while 12.2% of the patients and 1.6% of the controls had factor V Leiden. Among the 229 DVT patients there were 130 patients with clinically suspected thrombophilia (first thrombotic event occurring before the age of 45 years or positive family history of thrombosis or recurrent venous thrombosis). Ten percent of these 130 patients were carriers of the prothrombin G20210A mutation and 18.5% had the factor V Leiden mutation. The odds ratios (OR) for DVT risk were: 2.4 (95% CI, 1.0-6.3) for the total DVT patients and 5.2 (95% CI, 1.4-19.5) for the patients with clinically suspected thrombophilia with the prothrombin mutation. The risk of thrombosis was 6.9 (95% CI, 2.3-20.6) for the DVT patients and 14.3 (95% CI, 3.3-64.6) for the patients with clinically suspected thrombophilia with factor V Leiden. Fifty-five percent of the patients with combined congenital defects (prothrombin mutation G20210A plus another congenital defect) had recurrent thrombosis. In women receiving OC the risk of DVT was 3.5 (95% CI, 1.5-8.2) that of the patients not receiving OC. When women with combined defects were also taking OC, the risk of thrombosis increased significantly. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of the prothrombin G20210A mutation in the healthy population in our study is similar to that observed in other southern European countries. The prothrombin G20210A mutation does not by itself seem to be a high thrombotic risk factor. However, when it is present together with other thrombotic risk factors, the predicted risk of thrombotic events increases. The use of OC by women with the prothrombin G20210A variant or FV Leiden, either alone or combined with other thrombotic risk factors, was associated with a significant increase in the risk of venous thrombosis.     

Factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A and MTHFR gene mutations in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Thromboembolic events are more common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease than in the normal population; however, the reason for the increased prevalence is not clear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A and methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene mutations in IBD patients followed in our outpatient clinic. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with ulcerative colitis and 28 patients with Crohn's disease and 80 healthy controls were included in the study. No patient had a history of previous thromboembolism. Factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A and MTHFR gene mutations were studied. RESULTS: Heterozygote factor V Leiden mutation was found in five (6.25%) control patients and in two (3.2%) IBD patients. Heterozygote MTHFR mutation was obtained in seven (11.3%) IBD patients and in five (6.25%) controls. Heterozygote prothrombin G20210A mutation was found in two (2.5%) and homozygote MTHFR mutation in one (1.25%) control patient. There was no statistical difference between the IBD group and healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic mutations that could increase the thrombosis risk were not found to be different in IBD versus the normal population in our study.     

Thrombophilic mutations among Southern Iranian patients with sickle cell disease: high prevalence of factor V Leiden

BACKGROUND: A hypercoagulable state in sickle cell disease (SCD) and beta thalassemia has been established and thrombosis is an important aspect of the clinical spectrum of sickle cell disease. In a case-control study, the prevalence of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations were investigated among SCD patients from Southern Iran. METHODS: Patients comprised 60 individuals with SCD; of them 35 were with sickle cell anemia (SS) including 21 males and 14 females aged 17.2+/-8.3 years, 15 were sickle cell trait (AS) consisted of nine males and six females aged 30+/-15.4 years and 10 were sickle/beta thalassemia (S/Thal) (three males and seven females) aged 24.6+/-10.4 years. The control group were 126 apparently healthy individuals (50 males and 76 females) aged 20.1+/-9.8 years. Genotyping was done by polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment-length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) using Mnl I and Hind III for factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A, respectively. RESULTS: Heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation was found in five of 35 (14.3%) SS patients, two of 15 (13.3%) AS individuals, one (a sickle/beta-zero thalassemia patient with IVSII.1 G-->A mutation) of 10 S/Thal patients (10%), and two of 126 (1.6%) control subjects (P<0.05). However, only one AS individual (6.7%) was found to be a carrier for prothrombin G20210A compared to five of 126 (4%) healthy individuals. Adjusted logistic regression analysis for the effects of age and sex was performed and a significant association was found between factor V Leiden mutation and sickle cell anemia with odds ratios (OR) of 6.5 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.19-35.33, P=0.03) in SS patients. However, increased prevalence of the factor V Leiden in AS individuals and S/Thal patients was not statistically significant compared to controls (OR 3.84, 95% CI 0.49-29.9, P=0.19 and OR 3.77, 95% CI 0.31-45.9, P=0.29, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a significant correlation between factor V Leiden and sickle cell anemia among Iranian patients. Association between venous thrombophilia and factor V Leiden mutation in Iranians with sickle cell anemia should be further studied.     

Ramifications of four concurrent thrombophilic mutations and one hypofibrinolytic mutation.

A kindred was examined in which the 48-year-old white female proband with three deep venous thrombosis-pulmonary emboli events had four thrombophilic and one hypofibrinolytic mutations, and in which her 14-year-old asymptomatic daughter had four thrombophilic mutations. The proband was heterozygous for the G1691A factor V Leiden, G20210A prothrombin, and platelet glycoprotein IIIa PL A1/A2 mutations, had high factor VIII (221%), and was homozygous for the 4G4G plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 gene mutation, with high plasminogen activator inhibitor activity (23.7 U/mL). Her 14-year-old daughter was homozygous for the G1691A factor V Leiden and platelet glycoprotein IIb-IIIa PL A2/A2 mutations, compound heterozygous for the C677T and A1298C methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutations, and heterozygous for the G20210A prothrombin mutation, a combination with an estimated likelihood of 1.6 x 10(-7). In 247 white healthy controls, there was no V Leiden homozygosity and no V Leiden-prothrombin gene compound heterozygosity. Heterozygosity for the V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutations was 3.2% and 4.1%, respectively. Homozygosity for the platelet glycoprotein IIb-IIIa PL A2A2, PAI-1 gene 4G4G, and C677T MTHFR mutations was 3.2%, 22.7%, and 12%, respectively. The proband will receive anticoagulation therapy for life. Beyond aspirin, avoidance of exogenous estrogens, and enoxaparin prophylaxis during pregnancy, it is not known whether the proband's daughter should have lifelong anticoagulation therapy, or only after her first thrombotic event.     

Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene G20210A mutations are uncommon in portal vein thrombosis in India.

BACKGROUND: Extra-hepatic portal vein obstruction due to portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is an important cause of portal hypertension in several regions including India. The cause of thrombosis in these patients remains unclear. We studied the frequency of mutations in genes for coagulation factors V and II (prothrombin) in 61 Indian patients with PVT and 49 healthy control subjects. METHODS: The presence of factor V Leiden mutation and of G20210A prothrombin gene mutation was determined using polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism. Chi-squared test was used to compare patients and controls. RESULTS: Of the 61 patients (median age 11 years; 47 male) studied, 49 were children. One of 61 (1.6%) patients with PVT was heterozygous for factor V Leiden mutation and none had the G20210 prothrombin gene mutation. The frequencies of these mutations were not different from those in control subjects (2/49 and 0/46, respectively). CONCLUSION: Factor V Leiden and G20210 prothrombin gene mutations are infrequent in Indian patients with PVT. Thus, these mutations are unlikely to be responsible for PVT in the Indian population.     

The frequency of factor V Leiden and concomitance of factor V Leiden with prothrombin G20210A mutation and methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase C677T gene mutation in healthy population of Denizli, Aegean region of Turkey.

Factor V Leiden causing activated protein C resistance is the most common inherited form of thrombophilia leading to thrombosis. Its frequency shows great ethnic and geographic variations. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of FV Leiden and coinheritance of FV Leiden with two other frequent hereditary thrombophilia causes, namely, prothrombin G20210A and methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T mutation in the Aegean region of Turkey. The study population consisted of 1030 (500 men and 530 women) apparently healthy subjects. Functional resistance to activated protein C (APC) was measured by using the test kit STA staclot APC-R ((Diagnostica Stago, Asnieres, France, Cat. No. 00721). In subjects with APC resistance, molecular analyses of FV Leiden and of prothrombin G20210A and MTHFR C677T mutation were performed by using FV-PTH-MTHFR StripA (Vienna Lab, Labordiagnostika GmbH, Austria) kit, which was based on hybridization of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified DNA products with mutation-specific oligonucleotide probes. Functional APC resistance was present in 93 subjects (9%). FV Leiden mutation was found in 87 of 93 subjects with APC resistance by PCR method. The FV Leiden carrier frequency was found to be 8.4% (87/1030). Seventy-six individuals were heterozygous (7.3%), and 11 were homozygous (1.06%). Among the 87 subjects with FV Leiden mutation, 45 subjects had MTHFR C677T gene mutation (7 homozygous, 38 heterozygous) and 4 subjects had heterozygote prothrombin G20210A gene mutation. A combination of FV Leiden and prothrombin G20210A and MTHFR C677T gene mutation was detected in 3 subjects. The results indicate that FV Leiden prevalence is quite high and coexistence of FV Leiden with other hereditary causes of thrombosis such as prothrombin G20210A mutation and MTHFR enzyme defect is not rare in healthy population of Aegean region of Turkey.     

Prevalence of factor Ⅴ Leiden and prothrombin G20210A in patients with gastric cancer

AIM: To analyze the prevalence of the two commonest thrombophilic mutations, factor Ⅴ Leiden and prothrombin G20210A, in patients with gastric cancer.METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one patients with primary gastric carcinoma and 130 healthy subjects,comparable for age and sex, were investigated. Factor Ⅴ Leiden was detected by using polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme digestion, and prothrombin G20210A gene mutation by allele-specific PCR.RESULTS: Among the 121 cancer patients, factor Ⅴ Leiden was found in 4 cases (GA genotype: 3.3%) and prothrombin G20210A in 10 cases (GA genotype: 8.3%).Of the 130 control subjects, factor Ⅴ Leiden was detected in 6 cases (GA genotype: 4.6%) and prothrombin G20210A in 8 cases (GA genotype: 6.1%). No double heterozygous carriers of both mutations were found in either group. The prevalence of both factor Ⅴ Leiden and prothrombin G20210A variant was not statistically different between the cancer patients and the healthy subjects.CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that, in gastric cancer, the risk factors of thrombophilic cancer state are on acquired rather than on a genetic basis and that prothrombin G20210A does not seem to be a cofactor in gastric cancer pathogenesis.     

Prevalence of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations in unselected patients with venous thromboembolism

We determined the prevalence of factor V Leiden and of prothrombin G20210A mutations in a cohort of unselected outpatients (n = 748) referred for suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) and a pooled analysis of similar studies was also performed. Based on the clinical presentation, the prevalence of factor V Leiden was 15.7% in the 83 patients with DVT and 14.1% in the 99 patients with PE compared with 5.3% in patients without DVT and/or PE (control group). The prevalence of the prothrombin G20210A mutation did not differ among the three groups (3.9% for controls, 4. 8% for DVT and 3.9% for PE patients). We then divided the 99 patients with PE by separately analysing those with PE but without DVT (n = 57) and those with PE and DVT (n = 42). Compared with the control group, the prevalence of factor V Leiden was 10.5%, odds ratio (OR) 2.10 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.68-5.45] in patients with primary PE and 19.1%, OR 4.20 (95% CI 1.54-10.30) in patients with DVT and PE. For the prothrombin G20210A mutation, no statistically significant differences were found between the control group and the three other groups. In conclusion, our data and the pooled analysis indicate that patients with primary PE are less often affected by the factor V Leiden mutation. No statistically significant differences were observed between patients and controls for the prothrombin G20210A mutation.     

The prothrombin gene G20210A variant: prevalence in a U.K. anticoagulant clinic population

We have investigated the prevalence of a recently reported genetic variation in the prothrombin gene (G20210A) in patients with an objectively confirmed history of venous thrombosis. 12/219 patients (5.5%) were found to be heterozygous carriers of the 20210 A allele. The incidence of the 20210 A allele in a group of 164 healthy controls was 1.2% (allele frequency 0.61%, 95% CI 0.08–2.19). When patients with a known alternative hereditary risk factor for venous thrombosis (factor V Leiden mutation or deficiency of antithrombin, protein C or protein S) were excluded, the G20210A variant was found to increase the risk for venous thrombosis by approximately 5-fold (odds ratio 5.4, 95% CI 1.16–25.0). This prothrombin gene sequence variation adds further to the list of recognized genetic risk factors for thrombophilia.     

Prevalence of factor V Leiden G1691A, MTHFR C677T, and prothrombin G20210A among Asian Indian sickle cell patients

The prevalence of factor V (FV) Leiden G1691A, prothrombin G20210A, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T mutations were investigated among 90 sickle trait, 61 sickle homozygous, 75 sickle beta thalassemia, and 15 HbSD Asian Indian sickle cell patients. In all, 297 healthy controls were evaluated to compare the polymorphism frequency. The prevalence of FV Leiden heterozygous G>A were significant in the group (P = .02), while PRT G20210A polymorphism was not seen among patients as well as controls. However, an increased frequency of the MTHFR 677 C>T genotype was seen among patients as well as controls, but this was not statistically significant (P = .13). This suggested a low impact of inherited hypercoagulability risk factors in the pathogenesis of sickle cell disease and/or its complications.     

Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene G20210A mutations in Italian patients with Behçet's disease and deep vein thrombosis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency and type of vascular lesions and to study the association of factor V gene G1691A (Leiden) and prothrombin gene G20210A polymorphisms with venous thrombosis in Italian patients with Beh?et's disease (BD). METHODS: Included were 118 consecutive Italian BD patients followed over a 3-year period (1997-1999) who satisfied the International Study Group criteria for BD. The control group consisted of 132 healthy Italian blood donors. All BD patients and controls were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction and allele-specific restriction enzyme techniques for factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene G20210A polymorphisms. RESULTS: Vascular lesions were observed in 37 (31.4%) patients. The 2 most common lesions were subcutaneous thrombophlebitis (10.2%) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the legs (22.8%). No significant demographic and clinical differences between patients with and without DVT were present. The distribution of allele and genotype frequencies of prothrombin gene G20210A and factor V Leiden polymorphisms did not differ significantly between BD patients and healthy controls. The frequencies of carriage rates of prothrombin gene G20210A and factor V Leiden polymorphisms in BD patients with and without DVT were similar. However, the frequency of 20210A allele was significantly higher in BD patients with ocular disease than in those without, particularly in the patients with posterior uveitis/retinal vasculitis. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency and types of vascular lesions in Italian BD patients were similar to those reported in studies from other countries. No association between factor V Leiden mutation and G20210A mutation in the 3'-untranslated region of the prothrombin gene with DVT was found. However, a prothrombin gene G20210A mutation may influence the development and severity of ocular involvement in BD.