Randomized phase II study of biweekly CHOP and dose-escalated CHOP with prophylactic use of lenograstim (glycosylated G-CSF) in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9505.

BACKGROUND: CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) is accepted as the best available standard treatment for first-line chemotherapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). However, the therapeutic efficacy of CHOP remains unsatisfactory, particularly in high-intermediate risk and high risk patients, and a new strategy is warranted in this patient population. The aim of the present study was to explore a suitable therapeutic-intensified regimen for the treatment of aggressive NHL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 1995 and July 1998, a total of 70 patients with high-intermediate risk or high risk aggressive NHL, according to the International Prognostic Index, were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either eight cycles of standard CHOP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2), vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) and prednisolone 100 mg for 5 days) every 2 weeks, or six cycles of dose-escalated CHOP (cyclophosphamide 1500 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 70 mg/m(2), vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) and prednisolone 100 mg for 5 days) every 3 weeks. Lenograstim (glycosylated rHuG-CSF), at a dose of 2 micro g/kg/day s.c., was administered daily from day 3 until day 13 with biweekly CHOP and until day 20 with the dose-escalated CHOP. The primary endpoint was complete response rate. RESULTS: The complete response rate was 60% [21 of 35; 95% confidence interval (CI) 42% to 76%] with biweekly CHOP and 51% (18 of 35; 95% CI 34% to 69%) with dose-escalated CHOP. The major toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia and was more frequent in the dose-escalated CHOP arm (86%) than in the biweekly CHOP arm (50%). Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was also more frequent in the dose-escalated CHOP arm (20%) than the biweekly CHOP arm (3%). Non-hematological toxicities were acceptable in both arms. One treatment-related death (due to cardiac arrhythmia) was observed in a dose-escalated CHOP patient. Progression-free survival at 3 years was 43% (95% CI 27% to 59%) in the biweekly CHOP arm and 31% (95% CI 16% to 47%) in the dose-escalated CHOP arm. Although seven patients were deemed ineligible by central review of the pathological diagnosis, the results for both eligible and all enrolled patients were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Similar complete response rates and progression-free survival rates, but lower toxicity, indicated that biweekly CHOP was superior to dose-escalated CHOP in the treatment of aggressive NHL. Based on these results, the Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group is conducting a randomized phase III study comparing biweekly CHOP with standard CHOP in newly diagnosed patients with advanced-stage aggressive NHL.     

A dose-finding study of glycosylated G-CSF (Lenograstim) combined with CHOP therapy for stem cell mobilization in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) reinfusion has been widely used for hematopoietic reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy. However, the optimal dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for PBSC mobilization in combination with chemotherapy for autograft remains unknown. METHODS: To find the optimal dose of glycosylated G-CSF (lenograstim) for PBSC mobilization in combination with chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), we conducted a dose-finding study on 43 newly diagnosed patients who had unfavorable prognostic factors. They received four to six courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone combined with lenograstim every 2 weeks (biweekly CHOP therapy). PBSC apheresis was started after the third course of biweekly CHOP therapy. Lenograstim was given daily from day 3 until the day of the last apheresis. The optimum dose of lenograstim was assessed based on mobilization efficacy and safety profiles at a daily single dose of 2, 5 and 10 microg/kg for eight patients in each level. RESULTS: The collected number of CD34+ cells in the first apheresis products was higher in the 5 microg/kg group than in the 2 microg/kg group (median, 4.22 x 10(6) vs 2.49 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, P = 0.051). The highest dose of 10 microg/kg (median, 2.99 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg) failed to show a dose dependence in PBSC mobilization. The efficacy and safety of the 5 microg/kg dose were further confirmed in an additional 19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that the recommended dose of lenograstim for PBSC mobilization with CHOP therapy in untreated NHL is 5 microg/kg.     

CHOP compared with CHOP plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the relative dose-intensity of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy could be improved by prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged 65 to 90 years (median, 72 years) with stage II to IV aggressive NHL were randomly assigned to receive standard CHOP every 3 weeks or CHOP plus G-CSF every 3 weeks on days 2 to 11 of each cycle. RESULTS: In 389 eligible patients, the relative dose intensities (RDIs) of cyclophosphamide (median, 96.3% v 93.9%; P =.01) and doxorubicin (median, 95.4% v 93.3%; P =.04) were higher in patients treated with CHOP plus G-CSF. The complete response rates were 55% and 52% for CHOP and CHOP plus G-CSF, respectively (P =.63). The actuarial overall survival at 5 years was 22% with CHOP alone, compared with 24% with CHOP plus G-CSF (P =.76), with a median follow-up of 33 months. Patients treated with CHOP plus G-CSF had an identical incidence of infections, with World Health Organization grade 3 to 4 (34 of 1,191 cycles v 36 of 1,195 cycles). Only the cumulative days with antibiotics were fewer with CHOP plus G-CSF (median, 0 v 6 days; P =.006) than with CHOP alone. The number of hospital admissions and the number of days in hospital were not different. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients, G-CSF improved the RDI of CHOP, but this did not lead to a higher complete response rate or better overall survival. G-CSF did not prevent serious infections.     

Rituximab-CHOP-ESHAP vs CHOP-ESHAP-high-dose therapy vs conventional CHOP chemotherapy in high-intermediate and high-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

With currently available combination chemotherapy regimens, the outcome of the patients newly diagnosed with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) identified as 'high' and 'high-intermediate' risk groups according to the international prognostic index (IPI) is still unsatisfactory and a more innovative therapy is urgently required to improve the survival of the patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of rituximab given in combination with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) and ESHAP (etoposide, methylprednisolone, high-dose Ara-C, cisplatin) vs CHOP-ESHAP and upfront high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) vs standard CHOP in patients aged < or = 65 years old newly diagnosed with 'high' and 'high-intermediate' risk aggressive lymphoma enrolled onto two consecutive treatment trials at the institute. Between May 1995 - July 2002, 84 patients, aged 15 - 65 years old, with newly diagnosed aggressive NHL and an age-adjusted IPI of 2 or 3 were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 38 years (range 15 - 65). The baseline demographic features, in particular the major prognostic variables, were similar between the treatment groups. Patients treated with rituximab-CHOP-ESHAP received eight cycles of rituximab (375 mg m(-2) on day 1 of cycles 1 - 6 and days 21 and 28 of cycle 7) plus CHOP (day 3 of cycles 1, 3 and 5) and ESHAP (day 3 of cycles 2, 4 and 6 and day 1 of cycle 7) at 21-day intervals. Patients enrolled onto the CHOP-ESHAP-HDT arm (n = 23) were treated with three courses of CHOP and then switched to two or four cycles of ESHAP followed by HDT. Patients treated with CHOP alone (n = 25) were treated with the standard eight cycles of CHOP. The rate of complete remission was significantly improved with rituximab-CHOP-ESHAP compared with either CHOP-ESHAP-HDT or CHOP alone (67% compared with 44% and 36%, respectively; p = 0.043). With a median follow-up time of 53 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was improved by the addition of rituximab-61% with rituximab-CHOP-ESHAP, compared with 43% for CHOP-ESHAP-HDT and 24% for CHOP alone (p = 0.088). Significant increases in failure-free survival (FFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (61% and 96%), compared with CHOP-ESHAP-HDT (34% and 90%) and CHOP (16% and 44%; p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively) were observed. Compared to CHOP, rituximab-CHOP-ESHAP yielded significantly superior OS (p = 0.014), FFS (p < 0.001) and DFS (p < 0.001). The survivals, however, were not significantly different from patients treated with CHOP-ESHAP-HDT. It is concluded that rituximab-ESHAP-CHOP is superior over standard CHOP and fares comparably to upfront HDT/ASCT in previously untreated patients with aggressive lymphoma. A prospective randomized controlled trial is warranted to confirm these results.     

Chemotherapy dose intensity in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is dose intensity an emerging paradigm for better outcomes?

BACKGROUND: Higher chemotherapy dose intensity has been studied as a way of improving the clinical outcomes in various malignancies, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). METHODS: We reviewed clinical trials that have studied the relation between dose and response in cancer chemotherapy, the theory behind dose-intense chemotherapy, and the clinical results with dose-escalated and dose-dense therapy in aggressive NHL. RESULTS: Myeloablative high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation produces higher 5-year survival rates than standard salvage chemotherapy in relapsed aggressive lymphoma, but its role as initial therapy is not yet clear. Nonmyeloablative dose-escalated chemotherapy is feasible with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support, but this approach does not improve outcomes. Dose-dense (14-day) CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) with G-CSF support produces better results than 21-day CHOP in patients with previously untreated aggressive lymphoma, without additional toxicity. The addition of etoposide to dose-dense CHOP may provide further benefits in younger patients. The addition of rituximab to G-CSF-supported dose-dense CHOP is feasible. Preliminary data suggest the feasibility of dose-dense chemotherapy for NHL with the once-per-cycle G-CSF, pegfilgrastim. CONCLUSION: Dose-dense chemotherapy with G-CSF support produced better clinical outcomes in both younger and older patients. Phase 3 trials of dose-dense CHOP plus rituximab with CSF support are warranted.     

Feasibility of High-Dose Chemotherapy without Stem Cell Support as a First-Line Treatment for Non-Hodgkin's Aggressive Lymphoma: A Pilot Study

A regimen which incorporates cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (CHOP) is the standard treatment for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), but it has not been effective in patients with aggressive NHL who are at high risk. The aim of the present trial was to investigate the feasibility of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) without stem cell support as a first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was a complete remission rate. The second endpoint was survival. Fourteen patients with aggressive NHL entered the study and were treated according to the K93 protocol (3 cycles of CHOP, high-dose etoposide and ifosfamide, and high-dose methotrexate) Eleven patients (79%) achieved complete remission (CR) and two (14%) achieved partial remission (PR). Overall survival (OS) after five years was 79%. The actuarial five year disease free survival (DFS) for the eleven cases of CR was 75%. During chemotherapy, grade IV hematologic toxicity was observed in all patients and grade IV non-hematologic toxicity in only one patient, who experienced oral ulcers. Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) apheresis was performed in eight cases. One harvesting was enough to provide an adequate number of CD34+ cells for the subsequent PBSC transplantation (PBSCT).

In conclusion our study confirmed the efficacy of the K93 protocol in obtaining a good response (CR + PR) rate and a very good DFS rate in most cases of aggressive NHL, with acceptable toxicity. This regimen may improve the outcome in cases of aggressive NHL without stem cell support. It seems worthwhile to conduct a randomized controlled study comparing the K93 protocol with the standard CHOP regimen.     

Feasibility of high-dose chemotherapy without stem cell support as a first-line treatment for non-Hodgkin's aggressive lymphoma: a pilot study

A regimen which incorporates cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (CHOP) is the standard treatment for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), but it has not been effective in patients with aggressive NHL who are at high risk. The aim of the present trial was to investigate the feasibility of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) without stem cell support as a first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was a complete remission rate. The second endpoint was survival. Fourteen patients with aggressive NHL entered the study and were treated according to the K93 protocol (3 cycles of CHOP, high-dose etoposide and ifosfamide, and high-dose methotrexate) Eleven patients (79%) achieved complete remission (CR) and two (14%) achieved partial remission (PR). Overall survival (OS) after five years was 79%. The actuarial five year disease free survival (DFS) for the eleven cases of CR was 75%. During chemotherapy, grade IV hematologic toxicity was observed in all patients and grade IV non-hematologic toxicity in only one patient, who experienced oral ulcers. Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) apheresis was performed in eight cases. One harvesting was enough to provide an adequate number of CD34+ cells for the subsequent PBSC transplantation (PBSCT). In conclusion our study confirmed the efficacy of the K93 protocol in obtaining a good response (CR + PR) rate and a very good DFS rate in most cases of aggressive NHL, with acceptable toxicity. This regimen may improve the outcome in cases of aggressive NHL without stem cell support. It seems worthwhile to conduct a randomized controlled study comparing the K93 protocol with the standard CHOP regimen.     

多西他赛联合重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子动员乳腺癌患者外周血干细胞的效果及影响因素分析

 目的研究多西他赛联合重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子（rhG-CSF）在乳腺癌患者动员外周血干细胞 （peripheral blood stem cell,PBSC）的效果及影响因素。方法2006年2月—2009年6月我科收治的55例 行多西他赛（商品名多帕菲,TXT,120 mg/m2 持续静脉滴注3 h）动员的乳腺癌患者,化疗后白细胞降至 1.0×109/L左右时使用rhG-CSF 5 μg /(kg·d) 动员至采集结束。并进一步分析患者年龄、化疗后白细 胞最低数、采集前各类血细胞数、内脏、骨转移情况及化、放疗情况对采集单个核细胞（mononuclear cell,MNC）和CD34+细胞的影响。结果多西他赛化疗动员后中位7d白细胞降至1.0×109/L 左右,皮下注 射rhG-CSF中位3d,采集总MNC平均(5.51±1.24)×108/kg,采集总CD34+细胞平均(2.90±1.38)×106/kg 。年龄、化疗后白细胞最低数与采集CD34+细胞均显著相关（P<0.05）。化疗的周期数≤6的患者采集平均 CD34+细胞数较周期数≥6患者显著增高（P<0.05）。无1例患者出现严重不良反应。结论TXT（120 mg/m2 持续静脉滴注3 h）联合rhG-CSF为转移性乳腺癌患者动员的有效安全方案。患者年龄、既往化疗周期数显 著影响患者CD34+细胞的采集数量。患者化疗后白细胞最低数可作为采集CD34+细胞数量的预测指标。     

Long-term update of a phase II study of rituximab in combination with CHOP chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

The present study aimed to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of chimeric anti-CD 20 antibody rituxan (rituximab, Biogen IDEC, San Diego, CA, USA; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA) in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Thirty-three patients with previously untreated aggressive B-cell NHL received six infusions of rituximab (375 mg/m² per dose) on day 1 of each cycle of CHOP chemotherapy, given on day 3 of each cycle of therapy. Currently, the patients now have a median follow-up of 63 months (range 34 - 82 months). The overall response (OR) rate was 94% and the complete response (CR) rate was 61% at the end of therapy. Of the 33 patients, 2 patients experienced disease progression and subsequently died of their disease, 2 patients experienced disease progression but were alive at last follow-up following additional therapy, and 2 patients died without experiencing disease progression: one due to a cerebral vascular accident at 9 months after therapy and a second patient due to small cell lung carcinoma at 55 months. The 5-year survival rate was 88% (95% confidence interval (CI) 72 - 97) and the 5-year progression-free survival was 82% (95% CI 64 - 93). There were no long-term adverse events noted directly related to the rituximab. The long-term follow-up of patients in this phase II trial of rituximab with CHOP chemotherapy for previously untreated aggressive NHL demonstrates a high response rate, which remains very durable with high 5-year overall and progression-free survivals.     

两周CHOP方案治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤临床疗效观察

目的:评价两周CHOP方案治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的疗效及不良反应。方法:对2000年1月至2004年10月68例非霍奇金淋巴瘤随机分为两周方案组(CHOP/2W)及三周方案组(CHOP/3W),每组34例,全部经病理及免疫组化证实。全部采用CHOP方案化疗,CTX750mg/m²d1、ADM50mg/m²d1、VCR1.4mg/m²d1、PDN100mgd1～5。两周方案组,从第5天至第11天开始行G-CSF预防白细胞下降。结果:两周方案有效率为97.1%,三周方案有效率为79.4%(P＜0.05)。两组患者的不良反应均无明显差异(P＞0.05)。结论:两周方案治疗NHL是一种安全、有效的治疗方案。     

Ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide: a highly effective cytoreduction and peripheral-blood progenitor-cell mobilization regimen for transplant-eligible patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a chemotherapy regimen that consisted of ifosfamide administered as an infusion with bolus carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for cytoreduction and stem-cell mobilization in transplant-eligible patients with primary refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-three transplant-eligible patients with relapsed or primary refractory NHL were treated from October 1993 to December 1997 with ICE chemotherapy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Administration of three cycles of ICE chemotherapy was planned at 2-week intervals. Peripheral-blood progenitor cells were collected after cycle 3, and all patients who achieved a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) to ICE chemotherapy were eligible to proceed to transplantation. Event-free and overall survival, ICE-related toxicity, and the number of CD34(+) cells collected after treatment with ICE and G-CSF were evaluated. RESULTS: All 163 patients were assessable for response, and there was no treatment-related mortality. A major response (CR/PR) was evident in 108 patients (66.3%); 89% of the responding patients underwent successful transplantation. Patient who underwent transplantation and achieved a CR to ICE had a superior overall survival to that of patients who achieved a PR (65% v 30%; P =.003). The median number of CD34(+) cells/kg collected was 8.4 x 10(6). The dose-limiting toxicity of ICE was hematologic, with 29.4% of patients developing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. There were minimal nonhematologic side effects. CONCLUSION: ICE chemotherapy, with ifosfamide administered as a 24-hour infusion to decrease CNS side effects, and the substitution of carboplatin for cisplatin to minimize nephrotoxicity, is a very effective cytoreduction and mobilization regimen in patients with NHL. Furthermore, the quality of the clinical response to ICE predicts for posttransplant outcome.     

BFM-90、CHOP和 CHOP/HD-MTX方案治疗儿童青少年 B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤的生存率比较

背景与目的：儿童青少年B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤(B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma,B-NHL)恶性程度高、进展快、早期患者对常规CHOP方案化疗可获得较好疗效,但晚期患者疗效差。对不同分期的患者应如何治疗值得进一步探索。本文回顾性分析和比较CHOP、CHOP HD-MTX和德国BFM-90方案治疗儿童青少年B-NHL的疗效、不良反应和生存率。方法：CHOP方案组30例3～17岁初治的B-NHL患者,Ⅰ／Ⅱ期13例,Ⅲ／Ⅳ期(St Jude分期)17例,均接受2～8疗程常规CHOP方案化疗,每3周重复。CHOP HD-MTX组18例3～14岁初治的B-NHL患者,Ⅰ／Ⅱ期6例,Ⅲ／Ⅳ期(st Jude分期)12例,均接受2～8疗程CHOP HD-MTX方案化疗和鞘注,每4周重复。BFM-90方案组25例1．5～15岁的初治的B-NHL患者,Ⅱ期7例,Ⅲ／Ⅳ期(St Jude分期)18例,均接受NHL-BFM-90方案化疗。Ⅰ／Ⅱ期患者接受A和B疗程交替化疗共4～6疗程;Ⅲ／Ⅳ期患者接受AA和BB疗程交替化疗共6疗程,每疗程间隔18～21天。结果：CHOP组21例(70％)完全缓解(complete response,CR),4例(13％)部分缓解(partial response,PR);有20％的疗程发生Ⅲ／Ⅳ级血液毒性。CHOP HD-MTX组15例(83％)CR,3例(16％)PR;有52％疗程发生Ⅲ／Ⅳ级血液毒性。BFM-90方案组24例(96％)CR,1例(4％)PR;Ⅲ／Ⅳ级血液毒性：A疗程57％,B疗程60％,AA疗程91％,BB疗程76％;AA疗程的血液毒性明显高于其他疗程。Ⅱ／Ⅲ级粘膜炎主要发生在AA和BB疗程,占35％。三组均按Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存率统计。CHOP组2年总生存率52．79％,Ⅰ／Ⅱ期患者72．73％,Ⅲ／Ⅳ期37．82％。CHOP HD-MTX组2年总生存率55．56％,Ⅰ／Ⅱ期患者83．33％,Ⅲ／Ⅳ期41．67％。CHOP组患者生存率与CHOP HD-MTX组比较无显著性差异(P=0．78)。BFM-90方案组2年无事件生存率84．01％,Ⅰ／Ⅱ期患者100．00％,Ⅲ／Ⅳ期患者77．04％。BFM-90方案组生存率与CHOP组和CHOP HD-MTX组比较有显著性差异(P=0．013,0．034)。结论：BFM-90方案能明显提高儿童青少年B-NHL的生存率,特别是对晚期患者的疗效改善更明显。CHOP和CHOP HD-MTX对早期患者可获得较好的疗效,但对晚期患者疗效差。对晚期B-NHL应采用类似BFM-90方案的高强度化疗。     

A dose-finding study of lenograstim (glycosylated rHuG-CSF) for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization during postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Lenograstim/Breast Cancer Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The optimum dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization after disease-oriented, conventional-dose chemotherapy remains unknown. METHODS: A multicenter dose-finding study of glycosylated G-CSF (lenograstim) for the mobilization of PBSCs following adjuvant CAF chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil) was performed in 38 patients with postoperative breast cancer. Each 10, ten and eight patients were sequentially allocated to one of the three dose groups (2, 5 and 10 micrograms/kg, respectively) of lenograstim. Lenograstim was administered subcutaneously (s.c.) daily from day 8 to the day of the last apheresis and CD34+ cells and colony-forming units-granulocyte macrophage (CFU-GMs) in peripheral blood were measured serially. Additionally, 10 patients who received adjuvant CAF chemotherapy alone also participated in the study, as a control. RESULTS: Lenograstim was well tolerated up to 10 micrograms/kg, except for one patient given 10 micrograms/kg who developed transient grade 3 hepatic enzyme elevation. The peak levels of CD34+ cells and CFU-GMs in peripheral blood showed dose-response relationships. The median peak CD34+ cells for the 0, 2, 5 and 10 micrograms/kg dose groups were 5.4, 34.3, 55.0 and 127.6 cells/microliter, respectively, and those of CFU-GMs for the 0, 2, 5 and 10 micrograms/kg dose groups were 0.01, 0.33, 1.32 and 3.30 CFU-GMs/microliter, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the previous reports suggesting that a pre-apheresis number of 40-50 CD34+ cells/microliter in peripheral blood is highly predictive for achievement of more than 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in a standard apheresis procedure of 10 litres, the optimum dose of lenograstim for PBSC mobilization following CAF chemotherapy in patients with postoperative breast cancer is 5 micrograms/kg/day s.c.     

Fourteen-day CHOP supported with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a phase II study

The safety and efficacy of compressed-cycle (14-day) standard-dose CHOP (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) supported with prophylactic recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) were evaluated in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Patients with intermediate- or high-grade NHL (Working Formulation groups D-H and J; N = 120), accrued from 25 clinical practices, were given 6 cycles of standard-dose CHOP every 14 days. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 microg/kg was given daily subcutaneously in each cycle, starting on day 2 and continuing until the absolute neutrophil count was = 10000/microL. The overall response rate was 89%, with complete responses (CRs) in 52 of 120 patients (43%) and partial responses in 55 (46%). These results are consistent with previously reported outcomes from trials in this population. Of the 720 chemotherapy cycles planned for all patients, 615 (85%) were given on time at full dose. The median relative dose intensity (RDI) of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin was 99%; the RDI of vincristine was 73%. In the 53 patients = 60 years of age, 80% of the chemotherapy cycles were given on time at full dose, with median RDIs similar to those in the entire population. Response rates in the older patients were also similar, with CRs in 24 patients (45%) and partial responses in 21 (40%). Hematologic toxicity was significant but tolerable, with no treatment-related deaths. At a median follow-up of 20.6 months, 77% of patients were still alive. Standard-dose CHOP administered every 14 days with prophylactic G-CSF support was delivered as planned in most patients and produced response rates comparable with those with CHOP given every 3 weeks, without exceptional toxicity.     

Sequential high dose chemotherapy as initial treatment for aggressive sub-types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results of the international randomized phase III trial (MISTRAL).

INTRODUCTION: Sequential high dose (SHiDo) chemotherapy with stem cell support has been shown to prolong the event-free survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. METHODS: To confirm this result in a multicenter trial, we randomized patients with aggressive NHL, to receive either eight cycles of CHOP or SHiDo. The primary endpoint was overall survival. RESULTS: 129 evaluable patients were randomized to receive either CHOP or SHiDo: median age, 48 years; 62% male; stage III+IV: 73%; age adjusted International Prognostic Index 1/2/3: 21%/52%/27%. Toxicity grades 3+4 were more pronounced in the SHiDo-arm with 13% versus 3% of patients with fever; 34% versus 13% with infections; 13% versus 2% with esophagitis/dysphagia/gastric ulcer. The remission rates were similar in SHiDo and CHOP arms with 34%/37% complete remissions and 31%/31% partial remissions, respectively. After a median observation time of 48 months, there was no difference in overall survival at 3 years, with 46% for SHiDo and 53% for CHOP (P = 0.48). CONCLUSION: In this multicenter trial, early intensification with SHiDo did not confer any survival benefit in previously untreated patients with aggressive NHL and was associated with a higher incidence of grades 3/4 toxicity.     

Randomized, controlled, dose-range study of Ro 25-8315 given before and after a high-dose combination chemotherapy regimen in patients with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of three different dose levels of pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Ro 25-8315) on progenitor cell mobilization and hematologic recovery in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Breast cancer patients (n = 36) were randomly assigned to receive before (part I) and after (part II) chemotherapy either a single-dose injection of Ro 25-8315 (20 microg/kg, n = 9; 60 microg/kg, n = 9; 100 microg/kg, n = 10) or a standard daily dose of filgrastim (part I, 10 microg/kg/d; part II, 5 microg/kg/d) (control group, n = 8). RESULTS: Overall, Ro 25-8315 was well tolerated. In part I, more progenitor cell mobilization was observed with Ro 25-8315 100 microg/kg. The peak of circulating CD34(+) cells was obtained at day +5 in the four groups, and the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) returned to less than 20 x 10(9)/L by day +15. In part II, high levels of circulating CD34(+) cells (> 20 cells/microL) were obtained in all four groups. The chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (< 1 x 10(9)/L) was similar in the four groups. Ro 25-8315 100 microg/kg was more effective than filgrastim in reducing the number of patients with an ANC less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L on day +12 after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: A single injection of Ro 25-8315 100 microg/kg might be the optimal dose for steady-state peripheral-blood progenitor cell mobilization. A single injection of 20, 60, or 100 microg/kg could be as efficient as daily administration of filgrastim to correct chemotherapy-induced cytopenia. The optimal dose of Ro 25-8315 should be determined according to the planned chemotherapy regimen.     

Ifosamide, epirubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a regimen for successful mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with multiple myeloma.

In general, the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients is poor and is achieved in most cases by combined cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. This study was performed to examine the efficacy of combined ifosfamide/epirubicine and G-CSF for PBPC mobilization and purging. Sixteen patients suffering from multiple myeloma in stage II/A and III/A according to Durie and Salmon underwent chemotherapy consisting of a total of three cycles of ifosfamide (3 g/m(2) on days 1 and 2 and epirubicine 80 mg/m(2) on day 1) and G-CSF (10 or 20 microg/kg body weight (BW) daily until harvesting). PBPC harvesting was performed after the first and third cycle of chemotherapy. The median number of PBPC after the first cycle of chemotherapy was 7.79 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg BW (ranging from 0.94-26.36 x 10(6)) and 6.38 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg BW (ranging from 0.79-29.31 x 10(6)) after the third cycle of chemotherapy. Clinical re-evaluation after three cycles of chemotherapy showed 13 (81 per cent) patients in partial remission (PR), two (12 per cent) in complete remission (CR) and one (6.25 per cent) in stable disease (SD). No major side-effects were observed, six patients developed hematological toxicity stage IV WHO for a median of 3.9 days but no serious infection episodes occurred. Combined ifosfamide/epirubicin and standard G-CSF is able to mobilize sufficient PBPC without serious side-effects for patients with MM and for purging procedures resulting in a high proportion of complete remissions after tandem high-dose melphalan chemotherapy.     

A randomised multicentre trial of modified CHOP versus MCOP in patients aged 65 years and over with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine in a randomised trial whether there is any significant difference in toxicity between modified CHOP and MCOP chemotherapy in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and to determine whether this reduced dose chemotherapy can be administered with full dose intensity, low toxicity and produce acceptable survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1993 and 2000, 155 eligible patients were randomised into this trial mainly from three centres (Nottingham, Birmingham and Leeds, UK). The patients were newly diagnosed with aggressive NHL and had a median age of 74 years (range 65-91 years). Ninety-six patients (62%) had bulky stage I or II disease; 59 patients (38%) had either stage III or IV disease; 77% had one or more extranodal sites involved at presentation; and 31% showed B symptoms. Seventy-seven patients were randomised to receive six cycles of modified CHOP (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) i.v., doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) i.v., vincristine 1 mg i.v. all on day 1 with prednisolone 20 mg bd for days 1-5) every 21 days and 78 patients to MCOP (mitozantrone 10 mg/m(2) i.v. substituted for doxorubicin). Growth factors were not used routinely. After completion of chemotherapy, 39 patients received involved field radiotherapy (35-40 Gy) in 20 fractions. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients (65%) completed all six cycles of chemotherapy. The median course dose intensity was 97%. The median follow-up for 53 surviving patients was 51 months. The median survival was 19 months (95% confidence interval 10-36 months) with an actuarial survival of 47% at 2 years and 42% at 3 years (CHOP versus MCOP, P = 0.79). There was no significant difference in any of the toxicities experienced with either CHOP or MCOP, except for white cell count (46 patients on MCOP and 27 patients on CHOP had grade 3 or 4 toxicity, P = 0.002) and red cell transfusion (37 patients, MCOP; 17 patients, CHOP; P = 0.001). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was documented in 75 patients (50%). One patient died from toxicity whilst in remission and seven patients died with septicaemia and persistent NHL. CONCLUSION: This multicentre randomised trial provides further information on the dose intensity achievable with CHOP or MCOP regimens in elderly patients (median age 74 years) with aggressive NHL. These dose-reduced regimens can be given with nearly 100% dose intensity with 65% of patients completing all the treatment. Survival is comparable to that observed with the more intensive regimens given in this age group.     

Pegfilgrastim to support CHOP-14 in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

This study investigated whether pegfilgrastim support would enable on-schedule delivery of dose-dense cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP-14) to elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Thirty patients 60 years of age and older with aggressive NHL were evaluated after receiving up to six cycles of CHOP-14 supported with pegfilgrastim. The median age was 68 years (range 61 - 74). Forty-seven per cent of patients received full dose chemotherapy on schedule for all cycles (range 65 - 93). Chemotherapy was delayed in 10 patients and dose reduced in 15 patients. Hematological toxicity was the most common reason for delays and dose reduction. Six of nine patients (67%) achieved a peripheral blood CD34⁺ count of at least 20 cells×10⁶ L^-1 on day 12 of cycle one. The delivery on schedule of dose-dense CHOP-14 to elderly patients with previously untreated aggressive NHL is safe and efficacious with once per cycle pegfilgrastim support.     

R-CHOP与CHOP方案治疗初治弥漫大B细胞型淋巴瘤在中国的多中心随机对照研究

背景与目的:CHOP化疗方案是目前治疗弥漫性大B细胞型非霍奇金淋巴瘤(non-HodgkinTslymphoma,NHL)的标准方案。利妥昔单抗(美罗华)作为一种针对CD20抗原表达阳性的B细胞的嵌合型单克隆抗体,对弥漫性大B细胞型淋巴瘤具有良好的疗效。在欧洲和美国,利妥昔单抗联合标准化疗方案治疗进展型NHL已经获得批准。本研究旨在比较利妥昔单抗加标准CHOP方案与标准CHOP方案治疗中国人CD20阳性的弥漫大B细胞型NHL患者的疗效和安全性。方法:2003年9月至2004年11月在全国9个研究中心进行,共有63例患者入组,其中CHOP组32例,R-CHOP组31例。所有入组患者均签署并提供知情同意书。CHOP组患者接受每3周为1个疗程共6个疗程的CHOP方案治疗;R-CHOP组患者在每个疗程开始的第1天联用利妥昔单抗的CHOP治疗方案。比较两组的完全缓解率、总体缓解率以及不良反应情况。结果:R-CHOP组和CHOP组的完全缓解率相似(41.9%vs.37.5%,P=0.719),而总体缓解率前者要高于后者(83.8%vs.65.6%,P=0.096),但无显著性差异。治疗期间CHOP组有21.9%的患者疾病进展,而R-CHOP组仅为3.2%,两组有显著性差异(P=0.026)。R-CHOP组和CHOP组的不良反应发生率相似(65.6%vs.67.7%),差异无显著性(P=0.859)。最常见的不良反应均为白细胞下降;R-CHOP组其次常见不良反应是发热和寒战,可能与输注利妥昔单抗有关。两组的临床相关毒副作用相似,差异无显著性。结论:利妥昔单抗联合CHOP方案治疗CD20阳性的弥漫大B细胞型NHL与单纯CHOP方案相比,能显著降低治疗失败率,同时并不增加化疗的毒副反应。