Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of lung cancer in Budapest in an institute specializing in chest diseases

Among 250 consecutive autopsies (170 males and 80 females) performed at the Institute of Pulmonology in Budapest in 1996/7, there were 132 deaths in which cancer of the lung/bronchus was deemed to be the underlying cause of death. At autopsy, six cases previously thought to be dying from lung cancer were found to have died from other diseases (false positive rate = 5%). Twelve lung cancer deaths were also found to have been missed, a false negative rate of 9%, which was similar for adenocarcinoma, squamous carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma cases. Our findings confirmed the expectation expressed earlier that death certification of lung cancer would be more accurate in an institute specializing in chest diseases, to which patients had to be fit enough to be transferred, than in two general hospitals in Budapest. Nevertheless, since most cases certified as dying from lung cancer die without the benefits available in the specialized institute, the estimated false negative and positive rates for lung cancer death certification in Hungary remain high, at an estimated 56% and 30%, respectively. The much lower autopsy rates in most other countries than in Hungary points to there being considerable inaccuracy in lung cancer mortality rates internationally.     

The autopsy as a performance measurement tool--diagnostic discrepancies and unresolved clinical questions: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 2479 autopsies from 248 institutions

OBJECTIVE: To develop a multi-institutional reference database for quality improvement purposes using the autopsy to define clinical diagnostic discrepancies and resolve clinical questions. DESIGN: Using the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes format, institutions prospectively assessed a maximum of 15 consecutive autopsies each, excluding forensic cases and stillborn infants, conducted over a 6-month period. They documented answers to clinical questions provided at autopsy and classified unexpected disease diagnoses according to a standardized system. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Hospital-based autopsies performed at 248 institutions participating in the 1993 College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Quality Improvement Program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentages of clinical questions resolved by the autopsy and percentage of autopsies with unexpected findings of graded clinical impact. RESULTS: In the aggregate database of 6427 questions from 2479 autopsies, overall 93.0% were answered by the autopsy. The 3 most common question categories were (1) identify pathology to account for clinical signs or symptoms (28.0%); (2) establish the cause of death (21.0%); and (3) confirm a clinical diagnosis (19.0%). At least one major unexpected disease finding that contributed to the patient's death was discovered in 39.7% of the total number of autopsies. There were no differences in the percentages of autopsies with these major unexpected findings when the data were stratified by institutional demographics or decedent characteristics. CONCLUSION: This multi-institutional study underscores the clinical relevance of postmortem examination in current medical practice by consistently providing answers to unresolved clinical questions and frequently revealing major unexpected findings that contributed to the patient's death. It is our strong belief that this postmortem-derived clinicopathologic information is a key indicator of effectiveness of care. Integration of this information into institutional quality improvement programs will improve system processes and clinician performance.     

The autopsy and vital statistics

Vital statistics in the United States are collected through a decentralized, cooperative system of various levels of government administrated by the National Center for Health Statistics. Although registration of all deaths is virtually complete and demographic items are accurate, the reliability of cause of death data is hampered by the current state of medical knowledge, the incompleteness of information available at the time of death, the way in which physicians complete death certificates, and the system of classification of underlying cause. The need for quality assurance in national cause of death statistics can be met in large part by connecting the autopsy to the mainstream of vital statistics. Through case by case individual linkage of death certificates and autopsies in designated demographic and/or geographic areas, a representative, continuously collected, population-based system of aggregated autopsy data would be created. Demographic and clinical selection bias should be checked and adjusted through traditional methods of epidemiologic standardization. Such a use of autopsy information could further pathology's goals of understanding disease and improving the public health.     

Documentation of the diagnostic quality of hospitals: evaluation of autopsy reports

Multiple factors have affected the decline in autopsy rates. Discrepancies between clinical diagnoses and findings at autopsy are frequently used as an argument for a high autopsy rate. However, the quality of the diagnosis is independent of the autopsy rate. A long-term study covering the years 1972-2002 in the University Hospital Zurich has documented a significant reduction of diagnostic errors in internal medicine. Major diagnostic errors (class 1) declined from 16% (1972), to 9% (1982), to 7% (1992) to 2% (2002). The main reason is the availability of new diagnostic procedures. In 2010 the analysis of class 1 diagnostic errors throughout the hospital documented class 1 discrepancies in only 1%. This low number of diagnostic errors has been published in the annual quality report of the University Hospital Zurich. The documentation of this improvement in the quality report of the hospital provides the opportunity to convince clinicians, health politicians and the hospital administration to support autopsies in teaching as well as non-teaching hospitals.     

Correlation of clinical diagnoses with autopsy findings: A retrospective study of 2,145 consecutive autopsies

The protocols of 2,145 autopsies were retrospectively reviewed and the findings compared with the clinical diagnoses. A sudden decline in the autopsy rate that occurred during the period studied was followed by a highly statistically significant difference in clinical accuracy (P less than 0.01), in favor of the predecline period. The overall rate of major discrepancies was 29 per cent. The most frequently missed diagnoses were infections, which were found in 26 per cent of all autopsies and had not been diagnosed clinically in 63 per cent of these cases. Malignancies occupied second place among overlooked diagnoses in the selected disease categories; in 99 per cent of the cases the malignancy was the principal diagnosis, and it had been misdiagnosed clinically in 42 per cent of these cases. Cerebrovascular disorders were correctly diagnosed in most cases (87 per cent of the patients in this group). Among autopsy diagnoses labeled as the immediate causes of death, the most frequently overlooked were pulmonary embolism and gastrointestinal hemorrhage, which were not recognized in 84 and 78 per cent, respectively. In cases in which clinicians were not entirely confident in their impressions, their diagnoses were usually confirmed at autopsy. In these cases 15 per cent of the patients died soon after admission to the hospital, with accurate diagnoses in 71 per cent. The discrepancies disclosed should be regarded as sufficiently large to mandate continued emphasis on autopsy evaluation as the basis for the control of the quality of patient care.     

The role of the autopsy in medical malpractice cases,I: a review of 99 appeals court decisions

CONTEXT: Fear that damaging information from autopsy may be introduced as evidence in lawsuits alleging medical malpractice is often cited as one factor contributing to the decline in autopsy rates. OBJECTIVE: To determine how autopsy information influences the outcome of medical malpractice litigation. DESIGN: We studied state court records in 99 cases of medical malpractice adjudicated from 1970 to the present to assess the role of information from autopsies in the outcomes. RESULTS: The 3 largest groups defined by cause of death at autopsy were acute pulmonary embolism, acute cardiovascular disease, and drug overdose/interaction. Findings for defendant physicians outnumbered medical negligence in the original trial proceedings by a 3:1 margin. The appellate courts affirmed 51 acquittals and 19 findings of negligence, and reversed the original trial court decision in 29 cases for technical reasons. We found no significant relationship between accuracy of clinical diagnosis (using the autopsy standard) and outcome of a suit charging medical negligence. Even when a major discrepancy existed between the autopsy diagnosis and the clinical diagnosis, and the unrecognized condition was deemed treatable, defendant physicians were usually exonerated. Moreover, major diagnostic discrepancies were relatively uncommon in suits in which a physician was found to be negligent. Conversely, in about 20% of cases, autopsy findings were helpful to defendant physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that a finding of medical negligence is based on standard-of-care issues rather than accuracy of clinical diagnosis. Autopsy findings may appear to be neutral or favorable to either the plaintiff or the defendant, but are typically not the crux of a successful legal argument for either side in a malpractice action. We conclude that fear of autopsy findings has no rational basis and is an important obstacle to uninhibited outcomes analysis.     

The role of the autopsy in medical malpractice cases,II: controversy related to autopsy performance and reporting

CONTEXT: We studied 99 appellate court records in cases of alleged medical malpractice and found no relationship between discrepant clinical and autopsy findings and outcome of litigation. Standard-of-care issues and not diagnostic accuracy were at the heart of every case. OBJECTIVE: To characterize and discuss issues related to the autopsy and/or pathologist behavior that were raised in court records of medical malpractice litigation. DESIGN: In 18 appellate court records, issues were raised about quality of autopsy performance and reporting or about death certification. The details of these controversies are succinctly reported here in a manner intended to be instructive to pathologists who perform autopsies in a hospital setting or on a private fee-for-service basis. CONCLUSION: Autopsy reports are intended to provide objective medical information in a coherent format to the patient's medical record, to the attending physician and other concerned staff physicians, to other health care professionals, and to the families of the deceased. Inevitably, occasions arise that require legal counsel to be added to this list of parties with a legitimate interest. Our findings emphasize that incomplete, incoherent, obfuscated, or delayed reporting of autopsy findings do not meet professional standards, are unethical if intentional, and may be counterproductive.     

The use of coroner's autopsy reports to validate the use of targeted swabbing rather than tissue collection for rapid confirmation of virological causes of sudden death in the community

Background and objectivesIn this study, coroner's autopsy reports were used to validate results obtained from respiratory virus screening of swabs rather than tissue collected during autopsy in cases of adult death of unknown cause.Study designCoroner's autopsy samples collected for respiratory virus screening between October 2010 and February 2011, were identified. Autopsy reports were requested from cases positive for a virus. Each report was reviewed to correlate findings at autopsy with the virology result and to determine whether the virus found was listed as a contributing factor in the death.ResultsSixty-four coroner's autopsy cases were identified and a respiratory virus was found in 25 cases. Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus was found most frequently, then RSV and influenza B with a dual influenza A and B infection and a parainfluenza type 1. Where multiple sites were swabbed, the virus was detected in all sites. Autopsy reports for 12 cases were obtained each reporting findings consistent with respiratory infection. Influenza A was always listed as a contributing factor in the death whereas RSV was listed once and influenza B was omitted in one case. The quality of the reports was variable and full histology was less likely to be performed in the elderly.ConclusionsWhile coroner's reports supported the use of swabbing rather than tissue collection, the lack of consistency and omission of the virology findings as contributing factors to death means that the burden of viruses on mortality statistics will remain under-estimated particularly in the elderly.     

Malignant neoplasms: discordance between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in 3,118 cases

BACKGROUND: During the past few decades, hospital autopsy rates have steadily declined throughout the Western world. This decline is mainly attributed to the introduction of advanced diagnostic techniques. Despite technological developments, discrepancy rates between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings remain high. Few studies have addressed discrepancy rates exclusively with regard to malignant neoplasms. In the present study, we reviewed the records of 3,118 autopsies performed at Mayo Clinic during a 6-year period (1994-1999) and identified clinically undiagnosed malignancies found at autopsy and clinically diagnosed cancers not confirmed at postmortem examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Autopsy protocols, provisional and final anatomic diagnoses, and data from the Mayo Autopsy Pathology Quality Assurance program were reviewed in an attempt to identify discrepancies between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings regarding malignant neoplasms. RESULTS: In 3,118 autopsies performed at Mayo Clinic between 1994 and 1999, a malignant tumor was identified in 768 cases (25%). In 128 of 3,118 cases (4.1%), the malignancy was not diagnosed clinically. In 14 of 3,118 cases (0.45%), autopsy failed to confirm a clinically diagnosed cancer. A review of the literature is presented. CONCLUSIONS: Autopsy remains an effective tool for the confirmation and refutation of clinical diagnostic findings regarding malignant neoplasms.     

Opportunistic infections in adults with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: a comparison of clinical and autopsy findings.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Many opportunistic infections causing death in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients are often not diagnosed prior to death. The objective of this study was to compare the premortem and postmortem diagnoses of opportunistic infections and tumors among 15 AIDS patients treated in a hospital in southern Taiwan. METHODS: Total autopsy (brain, chest and abdominal cavity) was performed in 2 patients, and partial autopsy in 13. RESULTS: Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, candidiasis, lymphoma, Kaposi's sarcoma, toxoplasmosis and salmonellosis were more commonly diagnosed before death than at autopsy. By contrast, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections and herpes simplex virus or varicella-zoster virus infections were more frequently diagnosed at postmortem examinations than prior to death. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this study found substantial discrepancies between autopsy findings and premortem clinical diagnoses in AIDS patients, especially for CMV infection.     

The importance of autopsy for quality assurance in medical care

For all persons who died in the city of Dresden and 7 surrounding counties from 1967 to 1978, documents relating to the clinical and pathologic diagnosis were examined and findings compared. The study covered nearly two thirds of all deaths which occurred in the district of Dresden during this time period. The autopsy rate overall was found to be 22.8%. In 57.3% the clinical diagnoses were found to have been correct, in 19.7% they corresponded in part, but in 23% there was no concordance whatsoever between the clinical and autopsy diagnoses. The influence of age, place of death and disease group on the agreement between clinical and underlying pathoanatomic diagnosis was also examined. The analysis highlighted the degree to which death statistics based on the death certificate are misleading. In up to 28.8% of cases there were formal errors in the underlying disease diagnosis listed by the certifying physician on the death certificate. The value of regular comparison between the diagnoses, and its usefulness for training and continuing medical education are emphasized. The results of the study underline the importance of making available more prospectors in the district of Dresden to meet the expanding tasks of the clinically active pathologist in autopsy and biopsy diagnostic efforts.     

Sudden death in epilepsy

Since at least 1868, the literature has recorded an excess of deaths associated with epilepsy which are thought to be seizure-related but in which the exact mechanism of death is not yet established. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) was defined in 1996 and is the recommended terminology to certify these deaths. The investigation and certification of these deaths has been criticized and there are no specific published guidelines. Most post-mortem examinations in possible SUDEP deaths will be at the request of the medico-legal authority who should provide the pathologist with full medical history and circumstances surrounding the death. A detailed external examination, complete internal examination and histology, toxicology and appropriate neuropathology are all essential elements of the investigation to establish the cause of death. The ultimate aim is to provide the relatives and government with accurate information to inform healthcare provision and decrease mortality associated with epilepsy.     

Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses: a comparison of university, community, and private autopsy practices

Although it is known that autopsies often disclose unexpected findings, few studies have been published that address the effect of institutional setting, selection bias, and length of hospitalization. Records of medical autopsies from 3 institutional settings were studied for discrepancies between clinical and autopsy findings. The settings were university hospital (n = 85); community hospital (n = 146); and private autopsy (n = 60), which were referred from various community hospitals and paid for by family members. The same prosector performed the autopsies in the community and private settings. The overall rate of major discrepancy that involved the cause of death was 17.2%. Factors that increased the likelihood of missed diagnoses were private setting (P = .0005), community setting (P = .02), and short hospital stay before death (P = .02). Additional major findings were present in 28.5% of autopsies. Length of hospital stay before death, institution, and selection bias all affect the rate of major unexpected findings in hospital-based autopsies.     

Changement de protocole dans la méthode d’autopsie verbale et mesure de la mortalité palustre en milieu rural sénégalais

In rural Senegal, three populations have been followed up since several decades and the malaria mortality trend has been observed since the mid-1980s. However, limits are associated with the verbal autopsy method used to determine causes of death, especially deaths due to malaria. A change in protocol occurred in recent years in two of these three sites with the involvement of two physicians (instead of only one) in the diagnosis. The objective is here to measure its potential impact on diagnosis of malaria deaths. Five hundred and fifteen diagnoses reported on child deaths occurred from 2000 to 2005 have been analysed. We have identified, on the basis of a multinomial logistic regression model, factors affecting the determination of malaria deaths among the characteristics of the child, the death, the illness and its symptoms, and we also took into account method factors. Factors related to the method do not play on the malaria diagnosis. This result insures the continuity of the series on malaria mortality statistics since 2000 in the two sites despite changes in the method. However, the new protocol leads to vanish possibility of having deaths among ill-defined or unknown causes. In the African context of absence of health statistics, data obtained through the verbal autopsy method in demographic surveillance system can provide accurate information in the epidemiological field, even regarding malaria.     

A retrospective study of the accuracy between clinical and autopsy cause of death in the University of Malaya Medical Centre

It is well known that diagnostic accuracy of the clinical cause of death has not improved despite advances in diagnostic techniques. We aimed to investigate the accuracy of the clinical cause of death compared with the autopsy cause of death and to see if the Coroner's autopsy can play a role in clinical audit. Our study population consisted of all autopsies where the deceased was hospitalised or resuscitated at the Accident and Emergency Unit of the University of Malaya Medical Centre before death, performed during the period July 1998 to June 2000. The cases were subdivided according to natural and unnatural causes of deaths. Natural deaths were further subdivided in relation to the main organ systems involved while unnatural deaths were subcategorised into trauma, poisoning and burns. The rate of agreement between clinical and autopsy cause of death was further compared with duration of survival in the hospital. Of 132 autopsies included in this study, 115 were Coroner's autopsies. 78% of cases showed agreement between clinical and autopsy cause of death. The agreement rate in Coroner's cases was 80.0%. For natural and unnatural causes, the agreement rate was 56.7% and 84.3% respectively. There were 6 cases (4.5%) where an initial accurate diagnosis might have altered the prognosis of the deceased. In general, the rate of agreement increased with duration of survival of patients. However, this was no longer observed after a survival of more than 28 days. Our findings agree with other similar studies. The diagnostic accuracy of cause of death has not improved despite the modernisation in medical technology. The autopsy still plays an important role in clinical audit and medical education.     

Factors affecting autopsy rates, autopsy request rates, and autopsy findings at a large academic medical center.

Autopsy rates continue to decline in the United States. To assess the impact of various objective factors (time of death, day of death, age at death, patient gender, clinical service, and length of hospital stay) on the autopsy request rate, autopsy rate, successful request rate, and percentage of cases in which the autopsy examination added to or altered the clinical assessment of the patient, we prospectively studied all hospital deaths at a major academic medical center for the 3-year period from 1996 through 1998. The autopsy rate decreases significantly with patient age, both because of a decreasing request rate and because family members are less likely to grant permission. An autopsy is less likely to be requested for deaths in the emergency department or on general surgery services and most likely to be requested for fetal, medicine, cardiothoracic surgery, and pediatric deaths. Families more commonly grant permission for autopsy on fetal deaths, pediatric deaths, and emergency department deaths. Forty percent of autopsies reveal significant information about the patient's death beyond what was known premortem. This is least frequent among the fetal deaths, but relatively constant for adults of all ages. Patients who die in the emergency department are most likely to have significant unexpected findings at autopsy. Increasing the request rate for adult patients who die in the emergency department and on the medicine services will result in the greatest increase in information learned from autopsy.     

Autopsy study in the analysis of cardiovascular mortality

The frequency of using autopsy to verify the cardiovascular causes of death was studied in typical regions of Russia. One thousand and sixty deaths from circulatory system diseases were analyzed among a representative sample of 285,736 subjects. Death occurred outside health care facilities in 88% of the analyzed cases; nevertheless, autopsy was made only in 28.3%. Moreover, autopsy was carried out in all cases of less than 40-year-old males and less than 50-year-old females who had died from suspected cardiovascular diseases. The proportion of notified cardiovascular mortality increased in the structure of overall mortality and the rate of autopsy-verified diagnosis decreased with advanced age. To obtain valid information on cardiovascular mortality rates is limited due to low autopsy rates primarily in cases of death outside health care facilities, particularly among elderly and senile persons, despite the fact that it is these fatal cases that constitute the bulk of registered cardiovascular mortality.     

Autopsy causes of death in HIV-positive individuals in sub-Saharan Africa and correlation with clinical diagnoses

Despite the persistently high HIV-related mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, limited information on the causes of death is available. Pathological autopsies are the gold standard to establish causes of death. In this review we describe the autopsy series performed among HIV-infected individuals in sub-Saharan Africa over the last two decades. We identified nine complete and 11 partial or minimally invasive autopsy series. Complete autopsies were performed in 593 HIV-positive adults and 177 HIV-positive children. Postmortem diagnoses were mainly infectious diseases. Tuberculosis was the most frequent, present in 21-54% of HIV-positive adults and was considered the cause of death in 32-45%. Overall, pulmonary infections accounted for approximately 66% of pathology and central nervous system infections for approximately 20%. A high discordance between clinical and postmortem diagnoses was observed. This review emphasizes the need for reliable information on causes of death in order to improve HIV patient care, guide further research, and inform health policy.     

Creating a death register for general practice.

General practitioners complete approximately 26% of death certificates themselves but have considerable difficulty obtaining prompt and accurate information about their other patients who die. A random survey of district health authorities in England revealed that all were able to compile death lists but none included general practitioner details. This paper reviews the flow of information on patient deaths and describes a project to assess the feasibility of providing Newcastle general practitioners with comprehensive death registers. With the collaboration of the family health services authority and the district health authority, and with data from the regional perinatal mortality survey the creation each week of complete lists of patient deaths, broken down by general practitioner, is feasible. Death registers allow general practitioners to undertake audit of the quality of death certification and of the care of the recently deceased, and to improve the continuing care of the bereaved.     

Validity of verbal autopsy method to determine causes of death among adults in the urban setting of Ethiopia

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Verbal autopsy has been widely used to estimate causes of death in settings with inadequate vital registries, but little is known about its validity. This analysis was part of Addis Ababa Mortality Surveillance Program to examine the validity of verbal autopsy for determining causes of death compared with hospital medical records among adults in the urban setting of Ethiopia. METHODS: This validation study consisted of comparison of verbal autopsy final diagnosis with hospital diagnosis taken as a "gold standard". In public and private hospitals of Addis Ababa, 20,152 adult deaths (15 years and above) were recorded between 2007 and 2010. With the same period, a verbal autopsy was conducted for 4,776 adult deaths of which, 1,356 were deceased in any of Addis Ababa hospitals. Then, verbal autopsy and hospital data sets were merged using the variables; full name of the deceased, sex, address, age, place and date of death. We calculated sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: After merging, a total of 335 adult deaths were captured. For communicable diseases, the values of sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values of verbal autopsy diagnosis were 79%, 78% and 68% respectively. For non-communicable diseases, sensitivity of the verbal autopsy diagnoses was 69%, specificity 78% and positive predictive value 79%. Regarding injury, sensitivity of the verbal autopsy diagnoses was 70%, specificity 98% and positive predictive value 83%. Higher sensitivity was achieved for HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis, but lower specificity with relatively more false positives. CONCLUSION: These findings may indicate the potential of verbal autopsy to provide cost-effective information to guide policy on communicable and non communicable diseases double burden among adults in Ethiopia. Thus, a well structured verbal autopsy method, followed by qualified physician reviews could be capable of providing reasonable cause specific mortality estimates in Ethiopia. However, the limited generalizability of this study due to the fact that matched verbal autopsy deaths were all in-hospital deaths in an urban center, thus results may not be generalizable to rural home deaths. Such application and refinement of existing verbal autopsy methods holds out the possibility of obtaining replicable, sustainable and internationally comparable mortality statistics of known quality. Similar validation studies need to be undertaken considering the limitation of medical records as "gold standard" since records may not be confirmed using laboratory investigations or medical technologies. The validation studies need to address child and maternal causes of death and possibly all underlying causes of death.