肛门直肠测压的临床研究

肛门直肠测压是通过压力感受器对肛管直肠腔内压力变化进行测定的方法,它可以帮助了解、量化和评估肛管、直肠自制排便的功能,为排便异常等肛管、直肠疾病的研究提供病理生理学依据,并指导临床治疗,是一种安全、简便、无创、客观的检测技术。本文就肛门直肠测压在肛直肠疾病诊断与疗效评估等方面作一综述。     

Comparison of Air-Coupled Balloon Esophageal and Anorectal Manometry Catheters with Solid-State Esophageal Manometry and Water-Perfused Anorectal Manometry Catheters

Clinical gastrointestinal manometry studies are currently performed with multilumen water-perfused polyvinyl or strain gauge sensor solid-state catheters. A disposable catheter incorporating air-filled balloons has been developed with performance characteristics suitable for esophageal and anorectal manometry studies. Our aim was to compare esophageal and anorectal pressure measurements using this newly developed catheter with measurements obtained using standard solid-state or water-perfused catheters. Measurements of resting LES pressure, esophageal contraction amplitudes, and anorectal rest and squeeze pressures were obtained in 10 healthy volunteers using a solid-state esophageal catheter, a water-perfused anorectal catheter, and air-filled balloon esophageal and anorectal catheters. Correlation coefficient analysis demonstrated that LES pressures, esophageal contraction amplitudes, and anorectal resting and squeeze pressures were not significantly among between the different catheters. We conclude that recently developed air-filled balloon esophageal and anorectal manometry catheters provide very similar measurements of LES, esophageal body, and anorectal sphincter pressures compared to presently used manometry catheters.     

高分辨肛门直肠测压在先天性巨结肠中的应用进展

高分辨肛门直肠测压技术是在传统肛门直肠测压技术上的进步,是一种非侵入性的、简单的、安全的测定直肠运动及肛管排便功能、较传统的测压技术分辨率更高、分析数据更方便的测压方法。本文旨在对高分辨肛门直肠测压技术的发展及其在先天性巨结肠诊断、鉴别诊断及手术评估方面的应用作一概述。     

Funktionsdiagnostik des Kolons und Anorektums

For evaluation of functional disturbances of the colon and anorectum, diagnostic methods are available for measurement of motor activity, anorectal sensory function and evacuation. Measurement of motor activity can be achieved by colon (mostly after colonoscopic cleaning) and anorectal manometry or by barostat measurements. Anorectal manometry and barostat measurements also enable investigation of the colorectal sensory function. Intraluminal transit can be assessed with scintigraphy or by ingestion of radiopaque markers. Defecography either by conventional X-ray or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to visualize defecation disorders. From a clinical point of view, functional disturbances of the colon and anorectum manifest themselves as chronic constipation, including defecation disorders and fecal incontinence. Both syndromes are characterized by a high prevalence and a severely disturbed quality of life. Diagnostic evaluation should be initiated if a trial therapy fails. Colonic transit time measurement, defecography, and anorectal manometry are indicated for evaluation of chronic constipation, while anorectal manometry, anal endoscopic ultrasound, sphincter electromyogram (EMG), and if necessary, investigation of diarrhea are required for fecal incontinence.     

Anorectal manometry

This document contains the guidelines of the German Societies of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Gastroenterology (committee for proctology), Abdominal Surgery (coloproctology working group), and Coloproctology for anorectal manometry in adults. Recommendations are given about technical notes, study preparation (equipment; patient), technique for performing manometry and data analysis, reproducibility, and indications. Minimum standards for anorectal manometry are measurement of resting and squeeze pressure, testing of rectoanal inhibitory reflex, determination of rectal sensation (first perception and urge), and calculation of rectal compliance. Anorectal manometry is indicated in patients with fecal incontinence and constipation in the context of a structured programme.     

Combined anorectal manometry and defecography in 50 consecutive adults with fecal incontinence

Fifty consecutive patients presenting with fecal incontinence were evaluated prospectively with anorectal manometry, defecography, and other tests of anorectal function to assess the clinical utility of defecography in fecal incontinence. Leakage of contrast at rest and failure to narrow the anorectal angle with pelvic squeezing were specific but not sensitive predictors of decreased sphincter pressures as determined by manometry. Thus, after manometry, defecography provided no additional information regarding sphincter strength. Retention of contrast in large rectoceles or incomplete rectal evacuation at defecography had excellent correlation with the presence of clinical symptoms of outlet obstruction constipation (present concurrently with incontinence) and indicated an etiology of outlet obstruction symptoms. Defecography may provide useful information in incontinent patients with outlet obstruction constipation symptoms but has little additive value to anorectal manometry in incontinent patients without such symptoms.     

A Novel Technique to Identify Patients with Megarectum

Purpose Traditional methods of identifying patients with persistent dilation of the rectum, or megarectum, are associated with inherent methodologic limitations. The purpose of this study was to use a barostat to establish criteria for the diagnosis of megarectum and to assess rectal diameter during isobaric (barostat) and volumetric (barium contrast) distention protocols in constipated patients with megarectum on anorectal manometry. Methods During fluoroscopic screening, rectal diameter was measured at minimum distending pressure of the rectum, achieved using a barostat. It was also measured during evacuation proctography (volumetric distention). Having established a normal range in 25 healthy volunteers, 30 constipated patients with evidence of megarectum on anorectal manometry (elevated maximum tolerable volume on latex balloon distention) were studied. A further 10 constipated patients without evidence of megarectum were studied (normal rectum). Results Megarectum was diagnosed when the rectal diameter was greater than 6.3 cm at minimum distending pressure. Rectal diameter at minimum distending pressure was increased in 20 patients (67 percent) with megarectum on anorectal manometry, but was normal in the remaining 10 patients (33 percent) and all patients with a normal rectum on anorectal manometry. Rectal diameter was increased at evacuation proctography in only 15 patients (50 percent) with evidence of megarectum on anorectal manometry. Conclusions The prevalence of megarectum is overestimated and underestimated when rectal diameter is assessed using anorectal manometry and contrast studies, respectively. Controlled (pressure-based) distention combined with fluoroscopic imaging allowed accurate identification of patients with megarectum on the basis of a rectal diameter greater than 6.3 cm at the minimum distention pressure. Measurement of rectal diameter at minimum distention pressure may be useful in those patients with an elevated maximum tolerable volume on anorectal manometry when surgery is being contemplated. Presented at the meeting of the Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland, Birmingham, United Kingdom, July 2004. Published in abstract form in Colorectal Dis 2004;6(Suppl 1):72. Marc A. Gladman is supported by the Frances and Augustus Newman Foundation Research Fellowship of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.     

A simple method of anorectal manometry

Anorectal manometry is usually performed with an open-tipped tube or a closed balloon system. To overcome the well known measurement problems and errors associated with fluid-filled catheter systems and balloons, a pressure tranducer was used to perform anorectal manometry. This method, performed on more than 200 individuals with different anorectal disorders, is described. This was found to be a simple, reliable and reproducible method for anorectal manometry.     

Anorectal function in systemic sclerosis

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare esophageal and anorectal function parameters in patients with systemic sclerosis and to define the role of anorectal manometry in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal involvement of systemic sclerosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive patients (22 females) with systemic sclerosis originally referred for assessment of esophageal function were evaluated by esophageal and anorectal manometry. Anorectal function parameters were compared between patients with normal and those with disturbed esophageal function. RESULTS: A total of 17 of 26 patients (65 percent) had severe esophageal dysfunction with aperistalsis of the lower two-thirds of the esophagus, whereas 9 patients (35 percent) had normal esophageal manometry. Only three patients (11.5 percent) suffered from occasional fecal incontinence. Anorectal function parameters (resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure, perception threshold) were not significantly different between patients with normal and those with disturbed esophageal motility. Rectoanal inhibitory reflex was excitable in nearly 90 percent of patients. CONCLUSION: In an unselected group of patients with systemic sclerosis, fecal incontinence and abnormal anorectal function are rather rare findings. Anorectal manometry cannot differentiate between patients with and without gastrointestinal involvement of systemic sclerosis.     

Defecation disorders. Characteristics of manometric studies and rehabilitation

The authors review the literature and their personal experience about the systematic exploration of defecation disorders by anorectal manometry and colpocystodefecography. They stress the importance of combining functional and morphological evaluation, in order to avoid inappropriate surgery. Concerning anorectal manometry, the determination of the smallest volume of rectal distention inducing a complete relaxation of the internal anal sphincter was found more useful than the maximal tolerable volume in the exploration of defecation disorders. Finally, the authors report the results of biofeedback conditioning prescribed in 30 patients (27 women, 3 men, mean age: 55 years) with defecation disorders (terminal constipation in 21, fecal incontinence in 9 patients). Several characteristics of anorectal manometry and of defecography were significantly improved after biofeedback conditioning.     

Endoanal Ultrasound Compared to Anorectal Manometry for the Evaluation of Fecal Incontinence: A Study of the Effect These Tests Have on Clinical Outcome

Tests for evaluating incontinence include endoanal ultrasound (EUS) and anorectal manometry. We hypothesized that EUS would be superior to anorectal manometry in identifying the subset of patients with surgically correctable sphincter defects leading to an improvement in clinical outcome in these patients. The purpose of this study was to compare these 2 techniques to determine which is more predictive of outcome for fecal incontinence. Thirty-five unselected patients with fecal incontinence were prospectively studied with EUS and anorectal manometry to evaluate the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and external anal sphincter (EAS). EUS was performed with Olympus GFUM20 echoendoscope and a hypoechoic defect in the EAS or IAS was considered a positive test. Anorectal manometry was performed with a standard water-perfused catheter system. A peak voluntary squeeze pressure of < 60 mm Hg in women and 120 mm Hg in men was considered a positive test. All patients were administered the Cleveland Clinic Continence Grading Scale at baseline and at follow-up. Improvement in fecal control was defined as a 25% or greater decrease in continence score. EUS versus manometry were compared with subsequent surgical treatment and outcome. P-values were calculated using Fisher's exact test. Patients (n = 32; 31 females) were followed for a mean 25 months (range 13–46). Sixteen patients had improved symptoms (50%). There was no correlation between EUS or anorectal manometry sphincter findings and outcome. Seven of 14 (50%) patients who subsequently underwent surgery versus 9 of 18 (50%) without surgery improved (P = .578). In long-term follow-up, approximately half of patients improve regardless of the results of EUS or anorectal manometry, or whether surgery is performed. Supported in part by a Glaxo-Wellcome Institute for Digestive Health Award.     

Assessment of Rectocolonic Morphology and Function in Patients with Chagas Disease in Barcelona (Spain)

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between colonic symptoms, radiological abnormalities, and anorectal dysfunction in patients with Chagas disease. We performed a cross-sectional study of untreated patients diagnosed with Chagas disease. All patients were evaluated clinically (by a questionnaire for colonic symptoms based on Rome III criteria) and underwent a barium enema and anorectal manometry. A control group of patients with functional constipation and without Chagas disease was included in the study. Overall, 69 patients were included in the study: 42 patients were asymptomatic and 27 patients had abdominal symptoms according to Rome III criteria. Anorectal manometry showed a higher proportion of abnormalities in symptomatic patients than in asymptomatic ones (73% versus 21%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Megarectum was detected in a similar proportion in the different subgroups regardless of the presence of symptoms or abnormalities in anorectal functions. Among non-Chagas disease patients with functional constipation, 90% had an abnormal anorectal manometry study. Patients with Chagas disease present a high proportion of constipation with dyssynergic defecation in anorectal manometry but a low prevalence of impaired rectoanal inhibitory reflex, although these abnormalities may be nonspecific for Chagas disease. The presence of megarectum is a nonspecific finding.     

Anorectal manometry and defecography in the diagnosis of fecal incontinence.

We carried out anorectal manometry and defecography prospectively in 43 consecutive patients with fecal incontinence. A subgroup of 17 patients with severe incontinence was identified radiologically by a short and incompletely closed anal canal. In these patients, the anal resting pressure was significantly lower than in the rest of the group (34.9 +/- 11.4 mm Hg versus 60.0 +/- 25.7 mm Hg, respectively; p less than 0.01). The anorectal angle did not change in 24 patients during squeezing, indicating a dysfunction of the puborectalis muscle. Manometric data did not differ between this subgroup and patients with a more acute anorectal angle during voluntary sphincter contraction. This indicates that the anal pressures recorded manometrically do not reflect the function of a muscular component that is important in the maintenance of fecal continence. We conclude that anorectal manometry and defecography are complementary diagnostic tools in the investigation of patients with fecal incontinence.     

Anal Sphincter Damage After Vaginal Delivery

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the relationship of anal endosonography and manometry to anorectal complaints in the evaluation of females a long time after vaginal delivery complicated by anal sphincter damage. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with anal sphincter damage after delivery, 22 with and 12 without anorectal complaints, and 12 controls without anorectal complaints underwent anal endosonography, manometry, and rectal sensitivity testing. Complaints were assessed by questionnaire, with a median follow-up of 19 years. RESULTS: Median maximum anal resting pressures were significantly lower in patients with anal sphincter damage with complaints (31 mmHg) than in controls (52 mmHg; P < 0.001). Median maximum anal squeeze pressures were significantly lower in patients with (55 mmHg) and without (69 mmHg) complaints than in controls (112 mmHg; P < 0.001 for both). Maximum anal resting pressures were significantly lower in patients with anorectal complaints after anal sphincter damage than in patients without complaints (P = 0.02). Results of anal manometry showed a large overlap between all groups. Rectal sensitivity showed no significant differences between the three groups. Persisting sphincter defects, shown by anal endosonography, were significantly more present in patients with anal sphincter damage after delivery with (86 percent) and without (67 percent) complaints than in controls (8 percent; P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). No differences in the number of echocardiographically proven sphincter defects were found between patients with or without anorectal complaints after anal sphincter damage CONCLUSIONS: Echographically proven sphincter defects are strongly associated with a history of anal sphincter damage during delivery. Sphincter defects are present in the majority of patients with anorectal complaints. Anal manometry provides little additional therapeutic information when performed after anal endosonography in patients with anorectal complaints after anal sphincter damage during delivery.     

Clinical, anorectal manometry and surface electromyography in the study of patients with fecal incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: to demonstrate the role of the clinical, anorectal manometry and surface electromyography in the assessment of patients with fecal incontinence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ninety-three patients with fecal incontinence are retrospectively reviewed and the data obtained from the directed clinical history, physical examination of the anal region, digital rectal examination, anorectal manometry and surface electromyography are analyzed. A treatment was administered in accordance with the alterations encountered and the results evaluated at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: fecal incontinence was predominant (91.4%) in women age 59.7+/-11. A background of obstetric risks (48.2%) was frequent in women. Also, 73.1% of the patients presented diarrhea. The anorectal manometry (ARM) demonstrated some alterations in 90.3% of the patients, whereas a hypotonic sphincter was the most common finding (85.7%). Rectal sensitivity or distensibility alterations were present in the rest of the patients. In 79.2% ofthe cases, hypotonic sphincter was associated with rectal sensitivity or distensibility alterations. In 65.2% of patients with hypotonic external anal sphincter, damage of the pudendal nerve was found and therefore biofeedback was indicated in 41.9% of them. CONCLUSIONS: the clinical study of the patients, together with the anorectal manometry and surface electromyography enables the identification of the cause of FI and its treatment. These studies demonstrate that in most cases the origin of the incontinence is due to multiple etiologies, however the treatment of some of the factors involved frequently improves the symptomatology.     

慢性特发性便秘发病机制探讨

目的通过结肠、肛门直肠动力学的变化及心理学基础初步探讨慢性特发性便秘(CIC)可能的发病机制.方法用肛门直肠测压法检测21例CIC患者肛门直肠动力学的变化,同时进行心理测试.20名健康者作对照.CIC组中11例行远端结肠测压,9例非CIC组作对照.结果CIC患者年龄偏大(P＜0.05);肛门括约肌静息压、最大缩榨压降低(P＜0.025,P＜0.005);肛管高压带长度增加(P＜0.005);引起直肠肛门抑制反射的最小松弛容量(MVR)增加(P＜0.005),肛门括约肌松弛率下降(P＜0.025);直肠内部容量刺激的排便阈值和最大耐受量均明显增加(P＜0.005,P＜0.005);11例CIC组患者远端结肠测压结果表明收缩时间百分比、动力指数较非CIC组均明显降低(P＜0.005);CIC患者焦虑、抑郁精神心理异常倾向的出现明显高于对照组(P＜0.05,P＜0.01).结论CIC发病机制是复杂的,结肠、肛门直肠动力学及精神心理因素均参与发病.     

Manometry of the gastrointestinal tract: toy or tool?

In the eyes of scientific researchers, there are various manometric techniques that are useful tools for studying the motility of the gastrointestinal tract. Clinicians, however, regard most of these techniques as toys, either because they do not lead to clinically relevant results, or because they are too cumbersome in clinical practice. Nevertheless, a number of manometric techniques have reached the status of clinically relevant diagnostic procedure in gastroenterology. Among these, oesophageal manometry is the most important. Not only has conventional oesophageal manometry been added to the diagnostic armamentarium of many hospitals, but also prolonged ambulatory recording of oesophageal pressures (usually combined with pH monitoring). Small intestinal manometry has also gained the status of a diagnostic tool, in particular in patients in whom the existence of pseudo-obstruction syndrome is suspected and in patients in whom total colectomy is considered because of intractable constipation. Sphincter of Oddi manometry is another example of a clinically relevant manometric technique to be used in particular in patients with suspected dyskinesia of the sphincter of Oddi. The value of anorectal manometry may have been overestimated in the past. The most important indication is the exclusion of Hirschsprung disease. The contribution of anorectal manometry to the diagnosis of anismus and to the work-up of patients with faecal incontinence is limited.     

Critical reappraisal of anorectal function tests in patients with faecal incontinence who have failed conservative treatment

Objective

Anorectal function tests are often performed in patients with faecal incontinence who have failed conservative treatment. This study was aimed to establish the additive value of performing anorectal function tests in these patients in selecting them for surgery.

Patients and methods

Between 2003 and 2009, all referred patients with faecal incontinence were assessed by a questionnaire, anorectal manometry and anal endosonography. Patients with diarrhea, inflammatory bowel disease, pouches or rectal carcinoma were excluded.

Results

In total, 218 patients were evaluated. Of these, 107 (49%) patients had no sphincter defects, 71 (33%) had small defects and 40 (18%) had large defects. Anorectal manometry could not differentiate between patients with and without sphincter defects. Patients with sphincter defects were only found to have a significantly shorter sphincter length and reduced rectal capacity compared to patients without sphincter defects. Forty-three patients (20%) had a normal anal pressures ≥40?mmHg. Seventeen patients (8%) had also a dyssynergic pelvic floor both on clinical examination and anorectal manometry. Fifteen patients (7%) had a reduced rectal capacity between 65 and 100?ml. There was no difference in anal pressures or the presence of sphincter defects in these patients compared to patients with a rectal capacity >150?ml. There was no correlation between anorectal manometry, endosonography and faecal incontinence severity scores.

Conclusion

In patients with faecal incontinence who have failed conservative treatment, only anal endosonography can reveal sphincter defects. Anorectal manometry should be reserved for patients eligible for surgery to exclude those with suspected dyssynergic floor or reduced rectal capacity.     

Anorectal pressure gradient and rectal compliance in fecal incontinence

To study whether anorectal pressure gradients discriminated better than standard anal manometry between patients with fecal incontinence and subjects with normal anal function, anorectal pressure gradients were measured during rectal compliance measurements in 36 patients with fecal incontinence and in 22 control subjects. Anal and rectal pressures were measured simultaneously during the rectal compliance measurements. With standard anal manometry, 75% of patients with fecal incontinence had maximal resting pressure within the normal range, and 39% had maximum squeeze pressure within the normal range. Anorectal pressure gradients did not discriminate better between fecal incontinence and normal anal function, since, depending on the parameters used, 61%–100% of the incontinent patients had anorectal pressure gradients within the normal range. Patients with fecal incontinence had lower rectal volumes than controls at constant defecation urge (median 138 ml and 181 ml, P<0.05) and at maximal tolerable volume (median 185 ml and 217 ml, P<0.05). We conclude that measurements of anorectal pressure gradients offer no advantage over standard anal manometry when comparing patients with fecal incontinence to controls. Patients with fecal incontinence have a lower rectal volume tolerability than control subjects with normal anal function. Accepted: 5 June 1998     

便秘型肠易激综合征患者结、直肠肛门动力学的临床研究

目的研究便秘型肠易激综合征患者结肠、直肠动力,直肠感觉功能.方法用结肠传输试验检测结肠传输时间,并用结肠传输指数分型,用肛门直肠测压方法测定便秘型IBS直肠静息压,肛管静息压,肛门括约肌最大缩榨压,模拟排便时,直肠收缩压,肛门括约肌剩余压,直肠对容量扩张刺激的初始感觉阈值,最大耐受容量,直肠顺应性.结果便秘型IBS患者全结肠及各节段结肠传输时间均高于对照组,便秘型IBS患者肛管静息压,直肠静息压与对照组无差异(P＞0.05),肛门括约肌最大缩榨压低于正常对照组,最大耐受容量及直肠顺应性均明显高于对照组(P＜0.01),且发现不同传输类型的便秘型IBS肛门直肠测压表现不同.结论便秘型IBS患者存在结肠、肛门直肠动力及直肠感觉功能异常,结肠传输试验与肛门直肠测压相结合,可体现不同传输类型便秘型IBS肛门直肠动力学病因机制.