Comparison of the Central Adrenal Vein and the Common Trunk of the Left Adrenal Vein for Adrenal Venous Sampling

PurposeTo compare left adrenal venous sampling (AVS) in two locations: the central adrenal vein and the common trunk.Materials and MethodsA total of 22 patients (12 men and 10 women; mean age, 50 y; range, 26–65 y) who were suspected of having primary aldosteronism (PA) and underwent successful AVS with cortisol concentration measurement and/or venography between November 2010 and August 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. In regard to the left adrenal vein, collections were done at two locations: at the common trunk below the confluence of the inferior phrenic vein and at the central adrenal vein, which was above the confluence. The effects of the inflow from the inferior phrenic vein on plasma aldosterone and cortisol levels were analyzed.ResultsEight patients had bilateral hypersecreting lesions and 13 had a unilateral lesion. One was diagnosed as having secondary hypertension other than PA. The median cortisol levels below and above the confluence were 129 μg/dL (range, 21–400 μg/dL) and 215 μg/dL (range, 21–690 μg/dL), respectively. The median aldosterone levels were 2,120 pg/mL (range, 164–42,700 pg/mL) and 4,275 pg/mL (range, 119–59,000 pg/mL), respectively. The median aldosterone/cortisol (A/C) ratios were 244 (range, 34–2,401) and 278 (range, 25–2,251), respectively. Cortisol and aldosterone levels were significantly higher above the confluence (P = .0050 and P = .0003, respectively), whereas the A/C ratio showed no significant difference (P = .12).ConclusionsAlthough higher levels of cortisol and aldosterone were obtained upstream, A/C ratio was not significantly different between the central adrenal vein and the common trunk.     

Dual Left Adrenal Venous Drainage Detected during Adrenal Vein Sampling

1. Download : Download high-res image (267KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

A New Spin on Adrenal Vein Sampling

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology -     

Anatomical Variations of the Left Adrenal Vein Encountered During Venous Sampling

PurposeTo identify anatomical variations in the left adrenal vein (LAV) and to evaluate the role of preprocedural contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) planning.MethodsThe length of the left adrenal central vein (LACV), the vessel that receives blood from all tributaries of the left adrenal gland, was measured using venograms of patients who had undergone adrenal venous sampling (AVS) for the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism between October 2017 and December 2019. The anatomical variants of the LAV were described and classified. Contrast-enhanced CT was used to evaluate the detection rate of the following: (a) confluence of the left inferior phrenic vein and the LAV and (b) the last tributary flowing into the LAV.ResultsIn total, 311 patients (143 men, 168 women; mean age: 49.3 years ± 11.0) were enrolled. Of them, 9 (2.9%) patients had anatomical variants lacking a LACV. In patients with a LACV (n = 302), the venographic LACV length was 9.0 mm ± 3.9 (<1 mm in 9 patients). The detection rate of the confluence of the left inferior phrenic vein and LAV, as determined using contrast-enhanced CT, was high (96.2%), whereas that of the last tributary flowing into the LAV was low (0.8%). In 4 of 18 patients with short or absent LACV, the variant was visualized using contrast-enhanced CT.ConclusionsIn some patients, the LACV is absent or short, which is an anatomical variation. Understanding venographic anatomical variations can help avoid misleading results resulting from a suboptimal sampling site in AVS. For some subtypes, contrast-enhanced CT may also help in planning the AVS procedure.     

Dual Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration of Gastric Varix Draining into the Left Adrenal Vein and Left Inferior Phrenic Vein

A 66-year-old woman with a gastric varix, draining into a dilated left adrenal vein and a left inferior phrenic vein, was treated with dual balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (B-RTO). Under balloon occlusion of the left adrenal vein and the left inferior phrenic vein, retrograde injection of a sclerosant (5% ethanolamine oleate) into the gastric varix was performed. Two weeks later, disappearance of flow in the gastric varix was confirmed on endoscopic ultrasound examination.     

Failure Mode Analysis in Adrenal Vein Sampling: A Single-Center Experience

PurposeTo analyze failure modes in a high-volume adrenal vein sampling (AVS) practice in an effort to identify preventable causes of nondiagnostic sampling.Materials and MethodsA retrospective database was constructed containing 343 AVS procedures performed over a 10-year period. Each nondiagnostic AVS procedure was reviewed for failure mode and correlated with results of any repeat AVS. Data collected included selectivity index, lateralization index, adrenalectomy outcomes if performed, and details of AVS procedure. All AVS procedures were performed after cosyntropin stimulation, using sequential technique.ResultsAVS was nondiagnostic in 12 of 343 (3.5%) primary procedures and 2 secondary procedures. Failure was right-sided in 8 (57%) procedures, left-sided in 4 (29%) procedures, bilateral in 1 procedure, and neither in 1 procedure (laboratory error). Failure modes included diluted sample from correctly identified vein (n = 7 [50%]; 3 right and 4 left), vessel misidentified as adrenal vein (n = 3 [21%]; all right), failure to locate an adrenal vein (n = 2 [14%]; both right), cosyntropin stimulation failure (n = 1 [7%]; diagnostic by nonstimulated criteria), and laboratory error (n = 1 [7%]; specimen loss). A second AVS procedure was diagnostic in three of five cases (60%), and a third AVS procedure was diagnostic in one of one case (100%). Among the eight patients in whom AVS ultimately was not diagnostic, four underwent adrenalectomy based on diluted AVS samples, and one underwent adrenalectomy based on imaging; all five experienced improvement in aldosteronism.ConclusionsA substantial percentage of AVS failures occur on the left, all related to dilution. Even when technically nondiagnostic per strict criteria, some “failed” AVS procedures may be sufficient to guide therapy. Repeat AVS has a good yield.     

Right Adrenal Venography Findings correlated with C-arm CT for Selection During C-arm CT-assisted Adrenal Vein Sampling in Primary Aldosteronism

Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate retrospectively the efficacy of C-arm CT to confirm right adrenal vein catheterization during adrenal vein sampling (AVS) and to correlate adrenal venography findings with C-arm CT and/or biochemical results for right adrenal vein selection.

Methods

Forty-two consecutive primary aldosteronism patients (M:F = 21:21; age: 29–70 years) underwent C-arm CT assisted sequential AVS. After catheterization of right adrenal vein, C-arm CT was performed to confirm catheter position. Catheter was repositioned when right adrenal gland was not opacified. Radiological images, medical records, and biochemical results were reviewed for technical/biochemical success rates and complications. Right adrenal venography findings of pinnate pattern, visualization of renal capsular vein, and retroperitoneal vein other than renal capsular vein were correlated with C-arm CT and/or biochemical results for right adrenal vein selection.

Results

Both the technical and biochemical success of AVS was achieved in 40 patients (95.2 %). C-arm CT failed due to catheter instability in one, and adrenal/vena cava cortisol gradient was <3 in one patient. Catheter was repositioned in four patients (9.5 %) according to C-arm CT findings. Right adrenal venography finding of renal capsular vein significantly correlated with C-arm CT and/or biochemical results (100 %) for right adrenal vein selection (p = 0.011, χ ² test), whereas pinnate pattern (p = 0.099) and other retroperitoneal veins (p = 0.347) did not. There was no procedure-related complication.

Conclusions

C-arm CT increases confidence of right adrenal vein catheterization during AVS. Visualization of renal capsular vein on adrenal venography suggests right adrenal vein catheterization and C-arm CT may not be required.     

Adrenal Vein Sampling Results and Surgical Outcomes in Patients with a Normal Plasma Aldosterone Concentration

PurposeTo determine the utility of adrenal vein sampling (AVS) and outcomes after adrenalectomy in patients with normal plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and elevated aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR).Materials and MethodsThe study sample included 106 patients with ARR greater than 20 and PAC between 5 and 15 ng/dL (normal PAC group) who underwent AVS from 2005 to 2021. These patients were compared with a cohort of 106 patients with ARR >20 and PAC >15 ng/dL (high PAC group) who underwent AVS during the same period. Data regarding baseline clinical characteristics, lateralization indices from AVS, and outcomes after adrenalectomy were analyzed.ResultsAVS was technically successful in 210 patients (210/212, 99%). A smaller proportion of patients in the normal PAC group showed a lateralization index of >4 compared with those in the high PAC group (44% vs 64%, P <.01). A similar proportion of patients in the normal PAC group experienced improved or cured hypertension after adrenalectomy compared with that in the high PAC group (94% vs 88%, P =.31). Hypokalemia was cured in all patients in the normal PAC group after adrenalectomy compared with 98% of patients in the high PAC group (100% vs 98%, P = 1).ConclusionsAlthough lateralization is less frequent for patients with normal PAC, patients who do lateralize show similar blood pressure response and correction of hypokalemia after adrenalectomy, regardless of initial plasma aldosterone levels. Therefore, patients with PAC <15 ng/dL should still be considered for AVS provided the ARR is elevated.     

Adrenal Vein Sampling for Primary Aldosteronism: A 2-Week Protocol for Withdrawal of Renin-Stimulating Antihypertensives

Objective

For evaluation of primary aldosteronism, international guidelines recommend a 4–6 week withdrawal of spironolactone, eplerenone, and amiloride prior to adrenal vein sampling (AVS). It is not always feasible to withdraw these drugs in patients with severe hypertension and hypokalemia. We present our experience evaluating the efficacy and clinical outcomes of a 2-week protocol for withdrawal of renin-stimulating antihypertensives prior to AVS.

Design

A single-center retrospective review of all patients who underwent AVS for primary aldosteronism between January 2014 and December 2015.

Patients

32 patients (24 M:8F, mean age 54y) underwent AVS with the 2-week protocol, and 32 held their renin-stimulating antihypertensives for 2 weeks instead of the recommended 4–6 weeks.

Measurements

Plasma renin activity (PRA) was measured immediately before venous sampling to assess for renin suppression (PRA < 0.5 ng/ml/hr). Demographics, antihypertensive medications, plasma aldosterone, plasma renin activity, and outcomes were reviewed.

Results

100% of procedures were diagnostic (selectivity index ≥ 3) and lateralization (lateralization index ≥ 4) was confirmed in 22/32 patients. 19/32 patients had contralateral suppression. PRA confirmed to be suppressed in 30/32 (94%) of patients. Of the 2 patients with unsuppressed renin, 1/2 lateralized diagnosing an aldosterone producing adenoma.

Conclusions

Renin was suppressed in nearly all patients following a 2-week withdrawal of renin-stimulating antihypertensives. Patients who cannot tolerate stopping these medications for 4–6 weeks as recommended by current guidelines may undergo a 2-week withdrawal without affecting the diagnostic outcome of AVS, provided renin suppression is confirmed.

Level of Evidence

Level 4, Case Series.

     

Adrenal ultrasonography

The adrenal gland was evaluated prospectively in 59 patients using gray-scale ultrasound. 95% accuracy was achieved. Recent modifications of this technique which affect the approach to the right adrenal gland are described, and the limitations of the technique as well as the role of ultrasonography in relation to other noninvasive imaging modalities are discussed.