Diagnosis and treatment of renovascular hypertension: a cost-benefit analysis

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate and compare the relative cost-benefit of Doppler sonography, MR angiography, and captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy as techniques for predicting a patient's clinical response to renal angioplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Estimations of positive and negative predictive values of baseline and captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy and Doppler sonography examinations for predicting a favorable outcome after renal angioplasty were based on a previously published prospective study involving 74 patients who underwent this treatment. For gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, predictive values were calculated from a subpopulation of 57 of these 74 subjects. The value of different combined strategies with these techniques for predicting clinical success after angioplasty was evaluated in this population. The costs of investigation and treatment per improved patient were calculated for each imaging technique and for combined strategies in a hypothetic 1,000-patient population with a 30% prevalence of renal artery stenosis, relying on the diagnostic performance reported in the literature for each technique in detecting renal artery stenosis. RESULTS: The costs for each improved patient were $12,579 for patients selected on the basis of a positive finding on Doppler sonography (false-negative results = 12/1,000) and $10,149 for patients selected with criteria combining a positive finding on Doppler sonography with a bilateral resistive index of less than 0.75 (false-negative results = 32/1,000). Patient selection based on a positive finding on MR angiography cost $18,119 (false-negative results = 0), whereas the cost of patient selection based on a positive finding on renal scintigraphy was $12,939 (false-negative results = 29/1,000). CONCLUSION: Doppler sonography is more cost-efficient but less sensitive than MR angiography for identifying patients with renovascular hypertension. MR angiography should be favored in hypertensive patients who are resistant to medical therapy to avoid false-negative examinations.     

Renal MR angiography at 1.0 T: three-dimensional (3D) phase-contrast techniques versus gadolinium-enhanced 3D fast low-angle shot breath-hold imaging.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of three different MR angiographic techniques at 1.0 T. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In 22 patients with renal artery stenosis confirmed at intraarterial catheter angiography, we also performed unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography and gadolinium-enhanced single breath-hold three-dimensional fast low-angle shot MR angiography. We determined circulation time to optimize signal acquisition in gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography after bolus injection of contrast material. RESULTS: Sensitivity, defined as the detection of a hemodynamically significant stenosis (>50% luminal narrowing), was 85% for enhanced phase-contrast MR angiography, 91% for gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, and 95% for unenhanced phase-contrast MR angiography. The combination of unenhanced phase-contrast MR angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography yielded 100% sensitivity for hilar artery stenoses. There were 13 false-positive findings with unenhanced phase-contrast MR angiography, 10 with enhanced phase-contrast MR angiography, and four with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (specificity: 38%, 52%, and 79%, respectively). Accessory renal arteries were not seen on unenhanced or enhanced phase-contrast MR angiography (0/8 patients) but were detected with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in five of the eight patients. Interobserver agreement (kappa = .62) was best with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. The quality of the images was unsatisfactory for adequate evaluation of segmental renal arteries with all three MR angiographic techniques. CONCLUSION: A combination of unenhanced phase-contrast MR angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography at 1.0 T proved useful as a screening protocol for renal artery stenosis.     

Renal arterial stenosis: prospective comparison of color Doppler US and breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography

PURPOSE: To compare color Doppler ultrasonography (US) with fast, breath-hold, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in detecting renal arterial stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with clinical suspicion of renovascular disease were prospectively examined with intra- and extrarenal color Doppler US and breath-hold, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Digital subtraction arteriography (DSA) was the standard of reference in all patients for the number of renal arteries and degree of stenosis. RESULTS: DSA depicted 103 arteries and 52 stenoses. Color Doppler US was nondiagnostic in two examinations. Significantly more of 13 accessory renal arteries were detected with MR angiography (n = 12) than with color Doppler US (n = 3; P <.05). For assessing all stenoses, the sensitivity and accuracy were 94% and 91%, respectively, for MR angiography and 71% and 76%, respectively, for US (P <.05). The sensitivity was higher for MR angiography (100%) than for US (79%; P <.05) in diagnosing stenoses with at least 50% narrowing. The specificity, accuracy, and negative predictive value in diagnosing stenoses of at least 50% narrowing were 93%, 95%, and 100% for MR angiography and 93%, 89%, and 90% for US. CONCLUSION: Breath-hold, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is superior to color Doppler US in accessory renal artery detection. Although the specificity of MR angiography is similar to that of color Doppler US, MR angiography has a better sensitivity and negative predictive value in depicting renal arterial stenoses.     

Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess three-dimensional (3D) gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, used alone or in association with duplex Doppler sonography, with a fast acquisition time (8 sec) for evaluating the extracranial carotid arteries. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 48 successive patients with carotid artery stenoses were examined with 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography. Of the 44 eligible patients, conventional angiography was available in 33 and duplex sonography in 27. We used the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial technique to quantify stenosis on all angiograms, and a 250 cm/sec threshold at duplex sonography to diagnose stenoses greater than 70%. Image quality of 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography was assessed, as well as sensitivity and specificity for each technique alone and in combination with duplex sonography. Conventional angiography was the gold standard. RESULTS: Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography yielded good image quality in 90% of cases. When used alone, it yielded a sensitivity and a specificity of 94% and 85%, respectively, in screening stenoses greater than 70% (70-99%). When combined with duplex Doppler sonography, it provided a 100% sensitivity and specificity for detection of stenoses between 70% and 99% and would have obviated 61% of conventional angiography. In comparison, 3D time-of-flight MR angiography used alone yielded a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 94%. In combination with duplex Doppler sonography, its use would have obviated conventional angiography in 74% of cases. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography provided accurate results in the diagnosis of occlusions and ulcers and can visualize distant stenoses. CONCLUSION: Used alone, 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is not accurate enough to replace conventional angiography in the evaluation of extracranial carotid arteries. In association with duplex Doppler sonography, however, it is accurate and may obviate a significant number of conventional angiographic examinations.     

Impact of Levovist ultrasonographic contrast agent on the diagnosis and management of hypertensive patients with suspected renal artery stenosis: a Canadian multicentre pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnoses obtained with unenhanced ultrasonography (US), contrast-enhanced US and captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy and to determine whether use of a contrast agent improves ability to assess the renal arteries with duplex Doppler US. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study was an open-label controlled trial involving 78 patients with hypertension suspected to have a renovascular cause. The patients underwent captopril-enhanced scintigraphy or routine unenhanced US (the usual diagnostic methods at the centres where the study was conducted) and contrast-enhanced US (with Levovist, Berlex Canada, Lachine, Que.). The patients were followed for 3 months after the diagnostic tests were performed. RESULTS: Enhanced US yielded a diagnosis for a significantly greater proportion of patients than did unenhanced US (77 [99%] v. 64 [82%] of 78 patients; p = 0.002) or captopril-enhanced scintigraphy (71 [99%] v. 58 [81%] of 72 patients; p = 0.002). Diagnosis was possible with both enhanced and unenhanced duplex Doppler US in only 64 (82%) of the 78 patients, and the diagnosis was the same with both methods for 63 (98%) of these 64 patients. In contrast, diagnosis was possible for only 58 (81%) of the 72 patients who underwent both enhanced US and captopril-enhanced scintigraphy; the same diagnosis was reported in 53 (91%) of these 58 cases. During follow-up, 11 patients (21 kidneys) underwent angiography. Significant stenosis was detected in 6 (55%) of the patients (8 [38%] of the kidneys). Both the enhanced and unenhanced US results agreed more often with angiography than did captopril-enhanced scintigraphy (9 [82%] v. 8 [73%] of the 11 patients). The proportion of patients in whom the left and right renal artery could be assessed by duplex Doppler US increased significantly (by 58% and 43%, respectively) with use of the contrast agent. CONCLUSION: Enhanced US had a higher rate of successful diagnosis than unenhanced US and captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy. Enhanced US might therefore be suitable as a screening method for hypertensive patients with suspected renal artery stenosis.     

Using gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography to assess arterial inflow stenosis after kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate use of gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR angiography in the assessment of suspected arterial inflow stenosis after kidney transplantation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients receiving kidney transplants (26 single-kidney transplants and two en block transplants) with suspected arterial inflow stenosis were examined with two MR angiography sequences: gadolinium-enhanced 3D fast spoiled gradient-recalled (SPGR) imaging and 3D phase-contrast imaging. Twenty-four of these patients then were examined using the gold standards: either digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (n = 23) or surgery (n = 1). MR angiography and DSA studies were independently and prospectively analyzed for the presence of arterial stenoses (mild [<50%], severe [50-90%], or critical [>90%]) in the iliac, anastomotic, and renal artery segments. Two independent observers retrospectively evaluated the MR angiography sequences for ability to detect or exclude significant (> or = 50%) arterial stenoses. RESULTS: In 22 single-kidney transplants, DSA showed eight significant stenoses in 66 arterial segments. MR angiograms adequately showed 66 of 66 segments (prospective observers) and 64 of 66 segments (each retrospective observer), which were subsequently evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of MR angiography in revealing significant stenoses were 100% and 98% (prospective analysis), 88% and 98% (retrospective observer 1), and 86% and 100% (retrospective observer 2). Concordance between observers showed kappa values exceeding .85 for all comparisons except the analysis of phase-contrast series (kappa = .62). In one en block transplant, DSA showed that stenosis was greater than 90%, although it had been graded at less than 50% with MR angiography. CONCLUSION: Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography accurately evaluated arterial inflow in single-kidney transplants.     

Comparison of intraarterial and IV gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with digital subtraction angiography for the detection of renal artery stenosis in pigs.

OBJECTIVE: Catheter-based intraarterial injections of gadolinium are useful during MR imaging-guided endovascular procedures to generate rapid vascular road maps. Using an animal model of renal artery stenosis, we tested the hypothesis that intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is as accurate as IV gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). We also tested the hypothesis that intraarterial MR angiography uses less gadolinium than IV MR angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We induced bilateral renal artery stenosis in five pigs. All pigs underwent comparative imaging with DSA, IV MR angiography, and aortic catheter-directed intraarterial MR angiography. For IV and intraarterial MR angiography, we used the same three-dimensional acquisition. We assessed differences in quantitative stenosis measurements among DSA, IV MR angiography, and intraarterial MR angiography using the Wilcoxon's signed rank test. RESULTS: Mean stenosis measurements (+/-SD) were as follows: DSA, 58% +/- 12%; IV MR angiography, 63% +/- 9.3%; and intraarterial MR angiography, 64% +/- 11%. There were no statistically significant differences in accuracy between DSA and IV MR angiography (p = 0.06), DSA and intraarterial MR angiography (p = 0.16), or IV and intraarterial MR angiography (p = 0.70). Intraarterial MR angiography used a mean gadolinium dose of 5.6 mL, compared with 9 mL for IV MR angiography. CONCLUSION: In swine, IV and intraarterial MR angiography have a similar accuracy for detecting renal artery stenosis. Intraarterial MR angiography uses smaller doses of injected gadolinium.     

Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of MR angiography, color Doppler sonography, and arteriography.

Findings of two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance (MR) angiography projection angiograms were prospectively compared with those of color Doppler sonography by using angiography as a standard in 23 consecutive patients (42 carotid bifurcations) to evaluate their utility in determining the presence of carotid artery stenosis. MR angiography helped detect 50% or greater lumen diameter stenosis (sensitivity, 0.96; specificity, 0.64). Color Doppler sonography with 1.25 m/sec peak systolic velocity as a threshold had a sensitivity of 0.96 and a specificity of 0.71. Statistical analysis showed a correlation between percentage of lumen diameter narrowing and the length of the zone of signal intensity loss with MR angiography (r = .69; P less than .0001). A stronger relationship was obtained between angiographic narrowing and peak systolic velocity derived from color Doppler sonography (r = .80; P less than .0001). Two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography displayed as projection angiograms and combined with carotid artery and combined with carotid artery sonography is a useful approach for helping detect and potentially grade the severity of stenoses of the carotid artery.     

Comparison of Doppler ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and catheter angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis

AIM: To compare the accuracy of ultrasound and two magnetic resonance (MR) angiographic techniques with catheter angiography in assessing atherosclerosis at the carotid bifurcation.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis were studied by Doppler ultrasound, time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography and conventional catheter angiography. The degree of stenosis found on ultrasound and MR angiography was compared with the results of catheter angiography. Four different assessment methods were conducted for the MR angiographic data. Kappa, sensitivity and specificity (with confidence intervals) values were calculated for the US and MR angiography results compared to catheter angiography.RESULTS: Catheter angiography showed 12 internal carotid artery occlusions (15%), 34 severe (44%), 12 moderate (15%) and 20 mild stenoses (26%), using NASCET criteria.Ultrasound showed 65% sensitivity and 95% specificity in detecting surgically amenable lesions, whilst the MR angiographic techniques had sensitivities varying from 82-100%, and specificities from 95-100%.A moderate kappa value was calculated for the US data, whilst all MR techniques were found to show very good agreement with catheter angiography.CONCLUSION: This data suggests that MR angiography is more accurate than Doppler ultrasound in defining surgical lesions and has comparable accuracy to catheter angiography. The use of contrast-enhanced MR angiography is useful in certain situations but is not essential in all cases.     

Vascular complications after living related liver transplantation: evaluation with gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR angiography for detection of vascular complications in patients who have undergone living related liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients who underwent living related liver transplantation were evaluated with gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography. All MR angiograms were assessed for patency of the hepatic artery and the portal vein using a four-point scale (grades I-IV). The results were correlated with conventional angiography (n = 23) and clinical follow-up with Doppler sonography (n = 53) for more than 6 months. RESULTS: Seventy-three of 76 MR angiography procedures were technically adequate. When grades III (focal narrowing [> 50%] at the anastomotic site) and IV (abrupt cutoff at the anastomotic site with nonvisualization of the right [or left] hepatic artery distal to the anastomosis) were regarded as the diagnostic criteria for hepatic artery stenosis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of MR angiography were 100%, 74%, 29%, 100%, and 77%, respectively. In the portal vein, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of MR angiography were 100%, 84%, 35%, 100%, and 85%, respectively, when grades III (narrowing [> 50%] without poststenotic dilatation) and IV (narrowing [> 50%] with poststenotic dilatation) were defined as criteria for portal vein stenosis. CONCLUSION: MR angiography was sensitive but not specific in the detection of significant vascular stenosis after living related liver transplantation. However, normal MR angiography findings reliably exclude the possibility of significant stenosis.     

Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of vascular complications after liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography as a tool for examination of liver transplant patients with potential vascular complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiograms were obtained in 34 patients. Results were retrospectively reviewed and correlated with conventional angiography in 20 of the 38 cases and sonography in 37 of the 38 cases. MR angiograms were evaluated for technical adequacy, vascular patency, and parenchymal abnormalities, and results were compared with angiography and sonography. Conventional angiography and surgery were used as gold standards when available. RESULTS: Thirty-four (90%) of 38 MR angiograms were technically adequate. Vascular abnormalities were identified in 20 patients, and 19 of these patients subsequently underwent angiography, surgery, or both. There were seven cases of hepatic artery thrombosis; all were detected with MR angiography with no false-positive or false-negative interpretations. Seven patients had moderate to severe hepatic artery stenosis (>50% narrowing as determined by conventional angiography). MR angiography revealed this stenosis in six of the seven patients, with one false-negative and three false-positive interpretations. Portal vein thrombosis was detected in three patients, and portal vein stenosis was detected in two patients. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is useful in the examination of liver transplant patients and offers a noninvasive adjunct in patients with difficult or indeterminate sonographic examinations.     

Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with conventional angiography versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography

PURPOSE: To evaluate the interobserver and intermodality variability of conventional angiography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the assessment of renal artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients underwent conventional angiography and gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional gradient-echo MR angiography. Three angiographers blinded to each other's interpretations and the MR angiographic findings assessed the conventional angiograms for renal artery stenosis. Similarly, three blinded MR imagers evaluated the MR angiograms. RESULTS: Interobserver variability for the degree of renal artery stenosis in the 107 kidneys evaluated was not significantly different between the two modalities. The mean SD of the degree of stenosis was 6.9% at MR angiography versus 7.5% at conventional angiography (alpha < or = .05, P > .05). In 70 kidneys (65%), the average degree of stenosis reported by the readers for the two modalities differed by 10% or less. In 22 cases (21%), the degree of stenosis was overestimated with MR angiography by more than 10% relative to the results of conventional angiography. In 15 cases (14%), the degree of stenosis was underestimated with MR angiography by more than 10%. CONCLUSION: Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography permits evaluation of renal artery stenosis with an interobserver variability comparable with that of conventional angiography.     

Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of time-resolved three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the detection of renal artery stenosis in comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography as the standard of reference. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients (age range, 25-81 years; mean, 62.9 +/- 11.9 years) with suspected renal artery stenosis underwent intraarterial digital subtraction angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, performed on a 1.5-T system with fast low-angle shot three-dimensional imaging (3.8/1.49 [TR/TE], 25 degrees flip angle, 10-sec acquisition time, and 1.5-mm partition thickness). Three time-resolved phases were obtained in a single breath-hold. Digital subtraction angiography and gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography were evaluated by four observers who studied 80 main renal arteries and 19 accessory vessels to evaluate the degree of stenosis. A stenosis reducing the intraarterial diameter by more than 50% was regarded as hemodynamically significant. Interobserver variability was calculated. RESULTS: Only one gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography study was not of diagnostic quality, as a result of failure of the power injector. All main branches were of diagnostic quality in 38 (97.4%) of the remaining 39 gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography studies. Seventeen (89.5%) of 19 accessory renal arteries were depicted with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. The overall sensitivity for significant stenoses was 92.9%. The overall specificity was 83.4%, and the overall accuracy was 85.9%. Interobserver variability of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography exceeded that of digital subtraction angiography. CONCLUSION: Time-resolved three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is a useful noninvasive method of screening suspected renal artery stenosis because of its easy application, short examination time, and high sensitivity despite of its higher interobserver variability.     

Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience

PURPOSE: To compare stepping-table digital subtraction gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the distal aorta and lower extremity arteries with conventional catheter digital subtraction x-ray angiography in patients with arterio-occlusive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients underwent both conventional catheter angiography and fast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and outflow vessels at 1.5 T; the images were acquired in three consecutive imaging locations during a single infusion of a gadolinium chelate. RESULTS: Compared with catheter angiography, according to the findings of two blinded independent reviewers, MR angiography had sensitivities of 81% and 89% and specificities of 91% and 95%, respectively, for demonstration of insignificant (< or = 50%) stenosis versus significant (51%-100%) stenosis. For demonstration of occlusion, the sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 97%, respectively, by consensus. There was good interobserver correlation between the two readers overall (kappa = 0.65 for reporting the degree of narrowing in all lesions; 0.86, for reporting of insignificant versus significant stenoses; and 0.928, for reporting of occluded versus patient segments). CONCLUSION: Stepping-table digital subtraction contrast material-enhanced MR angiography has high accuracy compared with catheter angiography in patients with arterio-occlusive disease of the aorta and outflow vessels. These preliminary study results suggest that this technique may ultimately provide a safe, noninvasive, and cost-effective alternative to catheter angiography.     

Diagnostic value of gadolinium-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance angiography in patients with suspected hepatic arterial complications after liver transplantation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy and clinical role of gadolinium-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in patients with suspected hepatic arterial complications after liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six consecutive MRA studies were performed in 33 liver transplant recipients after transplantation. MRA image quality was assessed subjectively. Thirty-two MRA studies were retrospectively reviewed and correlated with surgery (n = 2), conventional angiography (n = 18), or clinical follow-up (n = 12). MRA findings were also correlated with those of Doppler sonography in 30 of the cases. In 20 cases, concordance between MRA and surgery or conventional angiography was evaluated for each grade of hepatic artery stenosis (normal, mild [<50%], moderate [50-75%], severe [>75%], or occluded). RESULTS: MRA image quality was degraded 13 of 36 cases (36.1%) studies. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRA by consensus reading for more than 50% of hepatic artery stenosis or occlusion were 67%, 90%, and 81.3%, respectively. Of the 19 cases in which Doppler sonography was abnormal, MRA correctly characterized hepatic artery stenosis in 16 (84.2%). MRA also correctly identified all 5 occurrences of celiac artery stenosis. However, MRA overestimated the severity of hepatic arterial stenosis in 3 (15%) of 20 cases and underestimated 5 (25%) of 20 cases. CONCLUSION: MRA complements Doppler ultrasound to exclude significant hepatic artery stenosis. However, a substantial number of MRA studies were technically inadequate, and MRA demonstrated limited efficacy for correctly grading the severity of hepatic artery stenosis.     

Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: a pilot comparison of maximum intensity projection, multiplanar reformatting, and 3D volume-rendering postprocessing algorithms

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors compared diagnostic accuracy of maximum intensity projection (MIP), multiplanar reformatting (MPR), and three-dimensional (3D) volume rendering (VR) in the evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the renal arteries. They hypothesized that VR is as accurate as or more accurate than MIP and MPR at depicting renal artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 28 consecutive patients who underwent gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the renal arteries. Studies were postprocessed to display images in MIP, MPR, and VR formats. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA), when performed (nine of 28 patients), was the standard for comparison. For each main renal artery, an estimate of percentage stenosis was made for any stenoses detected by three independent radiologists. For calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, MR angiographic stenosis estimates were categorized as mild (0%-39%), moderate (40%-69%), or severe (> or = 70%). DSA stenosis estimates of 70% or greater were considered hemodynamically significant. RESULTS: Analysis of variance demonstrated MIP estimates of stenosis were statistically greater than VR estimates in two readers and greater than MPR estimates in all readers for all patients. MIP images also showed the largest mean difference from DSA stenosis estimates for all three readers. For both VR and MPR, mean differences between MR angiographic stenoses estimates and DSA estimates reached significance for only one reader, whereas, for MIP versus DSA, mean differences reached significance for all three readers. Although not statistically significant compared with DSA, accuracies of VR (87%) and MPR (89%) were greater than that of MIP (81%). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, MIP was the least accurate of the three image display algorithms tested. VR and MPR yielded similar values for each method of comparison.     

Evaluation of dynamic gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate a three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography sequence using standard MR gradients in detecting renal artery stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients referred for angiography for suspected renal artery stenosis underwent both conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and MR angiography. MR angiography was performed on a 1.5-T scanner with standard gradients. A fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-echo sequence was used with the following parameters: TR/TE, 10.3/1.9; flip angle, 45 degrees; field of view, 36 x 32 cm; matrix size, 256 x 128; one excitation; volume thickness, 70 mm; and partitions, 28. Gadolinium was administered IV as a dynamic bolus of 30-40 ml. Conventional and MR angiographic images were interpreted by two radiologists in consensus. RESULTS: DSA revealed 87 renal arteries, of which 79 were in 35 patients with native kidneys and eight arteries were in seven patients with transplanted kidneys. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography showed 85 (98%) of 87 renal arteries. Seventeen patients had 20 significant (>50% stenosis) renal artery stenoses and five patients had five occluded renal arteries revealed by DSA. MR angiography revealed 85 renal arteries (98%), 20 stenoses (100%), and five occlusions (100%). Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography led to one false-positive interpretation for renal artery stenosis and no false-negative interpretations. Thus, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR angiography for renal artery stenosis were 100%, 98%, and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The MR angiography pulse sequence we used was an effective and reliable technique for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. The sequence can be performed on widely available MR equipment that does not require fast gradient hardware.     

Interobserver Variability in the Evaluation of Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia with Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess interobserver variability in the interpretation of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiograms of splanchnic vessels in patients suspected of having chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two readers blinded to the initial interpretation retrospectively reviewed gadolinium-enhanced MR angiograms obtained for suspected CMI in 26 patients (20 women and six men; age range, 23-77 years; mean age, 61 years) who also underwent conventional angiography. Each reader graded the degree of stenosis based on the percentage diameter reduction of the celiac artery (CA), superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) by using a five-point ordinal scale: 0, no stenosis: 1, mild stenosis (<50%); 2, moderate stenosis (50%-75%); 3, severe stenosis (>75%); 4, occluded artery. Using the conventional angiogram as a reference standard, authors determined sensitivity and specificity for each observer, assigning two thresholds (grades 2 and 3) as significant stenoses. A kappa statistic (kappa) measured interobserver agreement. RESULTS: With grade 2 stenosis used as a threshold, cumulative accuracies for detecting significant stenosis were 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.99) for reader A and 0.97 (0.88-1.0) for reader B. Interobserver agreement for grading proximal splanchnic stenosis was 0.90 for CA, 0.92 for SMA, and 0.48 for IMA. CONCLUSION: Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is reproducibly accurate for detection of proximal splanchnic artery stenosis, with good to excellent interobserver agreement.     

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-enhanced phase-contrast MR imaging to measure renal artery velocity waveforms in patients with suspected renovascular hypertension

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the usefulness of phase-contrast MR imaging to measure renal artery velocity waveforms as an adjunct to renal MR angiography. We also examined whether an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor improves the diagnostic accuracy of waveform analysis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients referred for MR angiography of renal arteries underwent non-breath-hold oblique sagittal velocity-encoded phase-contrast MR imaging through both renal hila (TR/TE, 24/5; flip angle, 30 degrees; signal averages, two; encoding velocity, 75 cm/sec) before and after i.v. administration of an ACE inhibitor (enalaprilat). We analyzed velocity waveforms using established Doppler sonographic criteria. A timing examination with a test bolus of gadolinium contrast material was performed to ensure optimal arterial enhancement during breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional gradient-echo MR angiography. RESULTS: MR phase-contrast waveform pattern analysis was 50% (9/18) sensitive and 78% (40/51) specific for the detection of renal artery stenosis equal to or greater than 60% as shown on MR angiography. Sensitivity (67%, 12/18) and specificity (84%, 42/50) increased slightly, but not significantly, after i.v. administration of an ACE inhibitor. Also, the accuracy of quantitative criteria such as acceleration time and acceleration index did not improve after the administration of ACE inhibitor. CONCLUSION: Renal hilar velocity waveforms, measured using non-breath-hold MR phase-contrast techniques with or without an ACE inhibitor, are insufficiently accurate to use in predicting renal artery stenosis.     

Peripheral arterial disease: comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracies of color duplex ultrasonography (US) and contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and to assess interobserver agreement regarding contrast-enhanced MR angiographic findings in patients suspected of having peripheral arterial disease (PAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved the study, and all patients provided signed informed consent. Two hundred ninety-five patients referred for diagnostic and preinterventional work-up of PAD with duplex US also underwent gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Data sets were reviewed for presence or absence of 50% or greater luminal reduction, which indicated hemodynamically significant stenosis, and to determine interobserver agreement. At duplex US, a peak systolic velocity ratio of 2.5 or greater indicated significant stenosis. Primary outcome measures were differences between duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography in sensitivity and specificity for detection of significant stenosis, as assessed with the McNemar test, and interobserver agreement between the two contrast-enhanced MR angiogram readings, expressed as quadratic weighted kappa values. Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was the reference standard. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-nine patients had at least one hemodynamically significant stenotic lesion at contrast-enhanced MR angiography, duplex US, or both examinations. One hundred fifty-two patients underwent intraarterial DSA. The quadratic weighted kappa for agreement regarding the presence of 50% or greater stenosis at contrast-enhanced MR angiography was 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87, 0.91). Sensitivity of duplex US was 76% (95% CI: 69%, 82%); specificity, 93% (95% CI: 91%, 95%); and accuracy, 89%. Sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced MR angiography were 84% (95% CI: 78%, 89%) and 97% (95% CI: 95%, 98%), respectively; accuracy was 94%. Sensitivity (P = .002) and specificity (P = .03) of contrast-enhanced MR angiography were significantly higher. CONCLUSION: Results of this prospective comparison between contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex US provide evidence that contrast-enhanced MR angiography is more sensitive and specific for diagnosis and preinterventional work-up of PAD.