Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of results after 250 patients

To examine the efficacy of nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy in preserving sexual potency and urinary continence, and in providing complete tumor excision we analyzed the records of the first 250 consecutive patients with clinical stage A or B prostate cancer treated since this operation was adopted at our institution. Over-all, sexual potency was preserved in 71 of 112 patients (63%) who underwent bilateral nerve-sparing prostatectomy and 13 of 33 (39%) who underwent a unilateral nerve-sparing procedure with a minimum of 6 months of followup. Preservation of potency correlated with patient age (p equals 0.0035, chi-square) and was significantly (p less than 0.001, chi-square) higher in patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors (72%) than in those with pathologically extracapsular tumors (51%). Of 192 patients followed for at least 6 months 188 (98%) achieved urinary continence postoperatively. Over-all, apparent complete tumor excision as defined by organ-confined tumor with negative surgical margins and undetectable postoperative prostate specific antigen levels was achieved in 14 preoperatively potent patients (42%) who underwent a unilateral and 67 (59%) who underwent a bilateral nerve-sparing procedure. Completeness of tumor excision correlated with tumor stage. In approximately 45% of the patients incomplete tumor excision was owing to seminal vesicle and/or lymph node involvement or positive bladder neck margins that could not be attributed to the nerve-sparing modification. However, improper application of the nerve-sparing technique may have contributed in the others. We were unable to detect microscopic penetration of the capsule or distinguish between gross extracapsular tumor extension and periprostatic fibrosis at operation. We conclude that with proper application of nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy, potency can be preserved in the majority of patients without compromising the adequacy of tumor excision. The completeness of tumor excision appears to be determined primarily by the extent of the tumor. Therefore, patient selection is important. Patients with focal, well differentiated tumors are ideal candidates for a nerve-sparing procedure, while those with high volume, poorly differentiated tumors may be at a higher risk for positive surgical margins. The benefits of wide excision of the neurovascular bundles remain to be demonstrated formally.     

Seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy: a novel concept to restore early urinary continence

OBJECTIVES: Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy continues to be a distressing problem, even with preservation of the neurovascular bundles and meticulous apical dissection. Recent studies suggest that motor and sensory components of the pelvic nerve may be affected by surgery, since both components are anatomically located in intimate contact with the seminal vesicles. We propose seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy to preserve pelvic innervation and improve the rate of urinary continence. METHODS: Fifty-four patients were enrolled in this prospective study. A standard retropubic radical prostatectomy was performed in 34 patients. A seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy was performed in a pilot series of 20 consecutive patients. The seminal vesicle tip and surrounding tissue were preserved and carefully handled. In all patients, a modified pad test and posterior urethral sensory threshold test were performed preoperatively and 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively and correlated with urinary continence. RESULTS: The intraoperative preservation of the seminal vesicle tip was possible in all patients in this pilot series (n = 20). In the seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy group, the continence rate was 60% after 6 weeks and 95% after 6 months. These rates were significantly higher than the continence rates in the standard prostatectomy group (18% and 82% at 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively). The sensory threshold levels in the seminal vesicle-sparing group were similar to the preoperative values and were significantly lower than the postoperative threshold levels in the standard prostatectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Seminal vesicle tip-sparing radical prostatectomy may be a surgical option to preserve pelvic innervation and maintain urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. Further randomized studies are necessary to elucidate the impact of seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy on restoration of urinary continence.     

Early recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: evaluation of preoperative erectile function and nerve-sparing procedure as predictors

The aim of this study was to evaluate preoperative erectile function and attempted nerve-sparing procedure as predictors for early recovery of urinary continence after retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical approach (retropubic or laparoscopic) and learning curve for laparoscopic approach: group 1—retropubic approach (37 patients operated on from April 2000 to June 2006), group 2—laparoscopic approach (109 patients operated on from April 2003 to June 2006). We assessed state of urinary continence at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after removal of the urinary catheter. Overall rates of urinary continence were 18%, 49%, 68%, and 80% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Between groups 1 and 2, no statistically significant differences in recovery of urinary continence were evident, being 27% versus 15% at 1 month, 54% versus 47% at 3 months, 77% versus 65% at 6 months, and 91% versus 77% at 12 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively. An attempted nerve-sparing procedure (one or both neurovascular bundles) was statistically associated with urinary continence at 3 month, and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) score (≥14) was identified as a significant factor predicting urinary continence at 6 months after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Younger age tended to result in early recovery of urinary continence after retropubic radical prostatectomy.     

Erektionsstatus nach nervenerhaltender radikaler Prostatektomie

The time lapse before recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy is still under debate. Several pathophysiologies are postulated for postoperative erectile function rehabilitation. In prospective studies we measured nocturnal penile tumescence (NPTR) in the acute phase during the first night after catheter removal subsequent to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy to assess the neuronal organic erectile integrity.Eighteen sexually active patients suffering from local prostate cancer underwent bilateral and unilateral nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy. All patients completed an IIEF-5 questionnaire concerning erectile function preoperatively. The transurethral catheter was removed 14 days after surgery, and nocturnal penile tumescence was measured with an erectometer (Rigi-Scan) in each patient during the following night. None of these patients received any comedication interacting with erectile function.The preoperative IIEF score was >18 in all patients. After catheter removal, 17 of 18 patients (95%) had nocturnal penile radial rigidity >70% that persisted for >10 min during one night. In a control of four patients without a nerve-sparing procedure, no nocturnal erections were recorded.The measurement of NPTR in the acute phase after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy showed retained erectile function even during the "first" night after catheter removal. Our findings are important for an appropriate choice of pharmacotherapy for optimal recovery of erectile function. In cases of early penile erections, the cavernous nerve had been well preserved during surgery providing good neuronal integrity, and PDE-5 inhibitors can support organic rehabilitation of the corpus cavernosum. In the absence of early penile erections, the neuronal integrity of the cavernous nerve is presumed to be impaired. In this case, additional injection therapy should be chosen to support recovery of spontaneous erectile function.     

伐地那非治疗耻骨后前列腺根治切除术后的勃起功能障碍

超过三分之一的患者在行保留性神经的前列腺根治切除术后会出现勃起功能障碍(ED)。最近的研究表明,磷酸二酯酶 5(PDE5)抑制剂伐地那非可改善保留单侧或双侧神经的耻骨后前列腺根治切除术后ED患者的勃起功能,而且安全性良好。     

Prostatic Capsule- and Nerve-sparing Cystectomy in Organ-confined Bladder Cancer: Preliminary Results

We present a novel radical cystectomy technique that allows bladder cancer control while maintaining urinary continence and reducing the risk of erectile dysfunction by sparing the prostatic capsule and the neurovascular bundles. Between September 1997 and December 2002, 85 men were candidates for cystectomy; 32 were selected for a prostatic capsule- and seminal-sparing cystectomy with orthotopic urinary diversion. All patients had clinical organ-confined bladder cancer (cT1 to cT3a). One patient died of unrelated causes. Of the remaining 31 patients, two with pT4, N+ disease underwent three cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy and are free of disease at 10 and 12 months postoperatively. Twenty-nine patients with organ-confined bladder cancer are free of disease after a mean follow-up of 32 months. At 24 months, 98% of the patients are completely continent during the day and 83% during the nighttime hours. In addition, 80% of the patients are able to complete sexual intercourse without auxiliary measures at a mean of 24 months postoperatively. Prostatic capsule- and nerve-sparing cystectomy permits en bloc removal of the bladder, of the adenomatous prostatic tissue, and of the seminal vesicles, thereby achieving local cancer control and preserving erectile function and urinary continence.     

Relation between erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence after nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the status of erectile function and urinary continence after radical prostatectomy to investigate a possible relation between them and then determined whether the status of postoperative urinary continence affected erectile function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients who had no symptoms of erectile dysfunction or urinary incontinence preoperatively were included in this study. The postoperative status of erectile function and urinary continence was investigated using a self-reported patient questionnaire. RESULTS: Thirteen of 27 patients (48.1%) who underwent nerve-sparing procedures maintained erectile function, while 7 of 49 patients (14.2%) who underwent non-nerve-sparing procedures maintained it postoperatively. None of the 27 patients in the nerve-sparing procedure group reported incontinence, whereas 3 of the 49 patients (6.1%) who underwent non-nerve-sparing procedures reported moderate incontinence. However, no significant correlation between the International Index of Erectile Function-5 score and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire score was seen. CONCLUSION: No relation between the status of urinary continence and erectile function was shown, regardless of the nerve-sparing nature of the prostatectomy.     

Significance of erection hardness score as a diagnostic tool to assess erectile function recovery in Japanese men after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

The objective of this study was to characterize time-dependent recovery of erectile function in Japanese patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the erection hardness score (EHS). This study prospectively included 170 Japanese patients with localized prostate cancer (PC) undergoing RARP without neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. The erectile function of each patient was assessed based on the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) and EHS at the baseline and on every visit to an outpatient clinic after RARP. In this series, potency was defined as the ability to have an erection sufficient for intercourse, corresponding to EHS ≥3, while patients with EHS ≥2 were regarded as those with erectile function. Of these 170 patients, 20 and 75 underwent bilateral and unilateral nerve-sparing procedures, respectively; however, non-nerve-sparing procedures were performed in the remaining 75. A proportional increase in the IIEF-5 score according to EHS was noted at 24 months after RARP. At 6, 12 and 24 months after RARP, the recovery rates of erectile function were 11.9, 21.7 and 35.8 %, respectively, while those of potency were 3.8, 9.8 and 13.7 %, respectively. Of several factors examined, the age, preoperative IIEF-5 score and nerve-sparing procedure were identified as independent predictors of erectile function recovery. These findings suggest that favorable erectile function recovery could not be achieved in Japanese PC patients even after the introduction of RARP; therefore, it might be preferable for such a cohort to use EHS rather than IIEF-5 as an assessment tool for the postoperative recovery of erectile function.     

Nerve-sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, the surgical technique for open radical prostatectomy has evolved and increasing attention is paid to preserving anatomic structures and the impact on outcome and quality of life. METHODS: Technical aspects of nerve-sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) are described. Patient selection criteria and functional results are discussed, focusing on postoperative urinary continence. RESULTS: The video demonstrates the nerve-sparing open RRP and important steps are elucidated with schematic drawings. The value of nerve sparing, not only for preserving erectile function, but also for preserving urinary continence is discussed and results from our institution are presented. In our series, urinary incontinence was present in 1 of 71 patients (1%) with attempted bilateral nerve-sparing, 11 of 322 (3%) with attempted unilateral nerve-sparing, or 19 of 139 (14%) without attempted nerve-sparing surgery. In multiple logistic regression analysis, the only statistically significant factor influencing urinary continence after open RRP was attempted nerve sparing (odds ratio, 4.77; 95% confidence interval, 2.18-10.44; p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Nerve-sparing surgery has a significant impact on erectile function and urinary continence and should be performed in all patients provided radical tumour resection is not compromised. For successful nerve preservation we advocate a lateral approach to the prostate to improve visualisation and simplify separation of the neurovascular bundles from the dorsolateral prostatic capsule. Bunching, ligating, and incising Santorini's plexus over the prostate and not over the sphincter ensures a bloodless surgical field. Mucosa-to-mucosa adaptation of the reconstructed bladder neck and the urethra is another important factor to be observed.     

Role of sildenafil citrate in treatment of erectile dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: Sildenafil citrate was introduced as a treatment for erectile dysfunction in April 1998 in the United States and has been available since March 1999 in Japan. In this article, we assess the efficacy of sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in Japanese men after radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: Of 106 men who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy between January 1994 and March 2000, 43 were prescribed sildenafil at their request after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Medication was initiated at 25 mg, and if this was ineffective, the dose was increased to 50 mg. Of the patients, 18 underwent bilateral and 21 unilateral nerve sparing (NS) procedures, while in 4 patients, a non-NS procedure was performed. These patients were interviewed using a questionnaire about their response to sildenafil and using the 5-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire. RESULTS: Thirty-three of the 43 patients were eligible for evaluation of the efficacy of sildenafil and 27 completed the IIEF-5 questionnaires. Sildenafil at 50 mg had a better effect on sexual function than 25 mg in most Japanese patients. Of the 16 patients who underwent bilateral NS procedures, 10 (62.5%) had improved ability for intercourse and 3 (18.8%) had improved erections. Of the 13 patients who underwent unilateral NS procedures, 7 (53.8%) had improved ability for intercourse and 4 (30.8%) had improved erections. None of the 4 patients who underwent non-NS procedures had a positive response. Of 24 patients with positive response to sildenafil, 3 (12.5%) did not have to take sildenafil after receiving it because they did not require it for intercourse. Mean IIEF-5 score increased from 4.3 to 11.4 (P < 0.0001). Patient age, time since surgery, PSA and pathological stage did not have statistically significant effects on outcome. The most commonly cited adverse effect was headache (21%). CONCLUSION: Sildenafil is equally effective for erectile dysfunction in Japanese patients who have undergone bilateral and unilateral NS procedures, and aids recovery of natural erectile function after radical retropubic prostatectomy. However, non-NS procedure patients had no response to sildenafil. This study suggested that sildenafil is well tolerated and should be initially used for treatment of Japanese men with erectile dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy.     

Impact of penile rehabilitation with low-dose vardenafil on recovery of erectile function in Japanese men following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy

Erectile dysfunction （ED） is a major complication after radical prostatectomy （RP）; however, debatecontinues regarding the efficacy of penile rehabilitation in the recovery of the postoperative erectile function （EF）. This study includeda total of 103 consecutive sexually active Japanese men with localized prostate cancer undergoing nerve-sparing RP, and analyzed the postoperative EF, focusing on the significance of penile rehabilitation. In this series, 24 and 79 patients underwent bilateral and unilateral nerve-sparing RPs, respectively, and 10 or 20 mg of vardenafil was administered to 35 patients at least once weekly, who agreed to undergo penile rehabilitation. Twelve months after RP, 48 （46.6%） of the 103 patients were judged to have recovered EF sufficient for sexual intercourse without any assistance. The proportion of patients who recovered EF in those undergoing penile rehabilitation （60.0%） was significantly greater than that in those without penile rehabilitation （38.2%）. Of several parameters examined, the preoperative International Index of Erectile Function-5 （IIEF-5） score and nerve-sparing procedure were significantly associated with the postoperative EF recovery rates in patients with and without management by penile rehabilitation, respectively. Furthermore, univariate analysis identified the preoperative IIEF-5 score, nerve-sparing procedure and penile rehabilitation as significant predictors of EF recovery, among which the preoperative IIEF-5 score and nerve-sparing procedure appeared to be independently associated with EF recovery. Considering these findings, despite the lack of independent significance, penile rehabilitation with low-dose vardenafil could exert a beneficial effect on EF recovery in Japanese men following nerve-sparing RP.     

Effect of statin therapy on early return of potency after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy

PURPOSE: We prospectively investigated whether postoperative statin use would contribute to earlier recovery of erectile function in men who underwent bilateral nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 potent men without hypercholesterolemia undergoing bilateral nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer were prospectively randomized into 2 equal groups. Group 1 patients were instructed to ingest only 50 mg sildenafil per day if needed following hospital discharge after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Group 2 patients were prescribed atorvastatin at a dose of 10 mg daily from postoperative days 1 to 90 and they were also instructed to ingest sildenafil, as in group 1. Patient status regarding potency and adverse events were assessed 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: The 2 groups demonstrated no significant differences regarding various baseline factors, including International Index of Erectile Function-5 scores. Group 2 had a significantly higher postoperative International Index of Erectile Function-5 score than group 1 at 6 months postoperatively (p = 0.003). Meanwhile, as judged by a preset definition, the incidence of potent patients 6 months after prostatectomy was 26.1% in group 1 and 55% in group 2 (p = 0.068). Also, 17.4% and 40% of the men reported achieving intercourse by vaginal penetration without a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.172). No serious adverse events associated with medication were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative treatment with atorvastatin in men who report normal erectile function preoperatively may contribute to earlier recovery of erectile function after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.     

Role of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for clinical stage B2 prostate cancer.

To examine the role of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy in patients with clinical stage B2 prostate cancer we reviewed the first 77 such patients in our series since we adopted the nerve-sparing technique. A total of 47 patients (61%) underwent bilateral and 26 (34%) underwent unilateral nerve-sparing prostatectomy, while in 4 (5%) both neurovascular bundles were resected. Among the patients followed for 12 months 27 of 41 (66%) treated with bilateral and 7 of 19 (37%) treated with unilateral nerve-sparing prostatectomy had potency preserved. With the strict clinicopathological criteria of organ-confined tumor, that is intracapsular tumor with negative surgical margins and undetectable postoperative prostate specific antigen levels, complete tumor excision was achieved in 17 patients (36%) treated with bilateral and 7 of 26 (27%) treated with unilateral nerve-sparing prostatectomy. All patients in whom both neurovascular bundles were resected had pathological stage C or D1 disease. Of the 24 patients who had complete tumor excision by the strict criteria only 15 (19.5% of the 77 preoperatively potent patients) had potency preserved. Of these patients 19 had microscopically positive margins without seminal vesicle invasion (pathological stage C1) with undetectable postoperative prostate specific antigen levels. In addition, 4 patients had seminal vesicle involvement with negative surgical margins and undetectable postoperative prostate specific antigen levels. If these patients also are considered as having complete tumor excision, there was an over-all complete tumor excision rate of 61% (47 of 77), of whom 25 (32% of the 77 patients) had preservation of potency. Ten patients with clinical stage B2 tumor whose potency was preserved had histological and serological evidence of incomplete tumor excision. Of 53 patients with pathological stage C1 disease 9 (17%) had margins positive only in the regions of the neurovascular bundles. Preoperative prostate specific antigen and acid phosphatase levels, and findings on transrectal ultrasonography failed to predict accurately which patients had extracapsular tumor extension. Patients with poorly differentiated tumors and/or bulky disease on rectal examination had a higher incidence of extracapsular extension and positive margins. We conclude that in the majority of potent patients with clinical stage B2 prostate cancer not all of the goals of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy are realized.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Patient-reported validated functional outcome after extraperitoneal robotic-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Erectile function after prostate surgery is an important criterion for patients when they are choosing a treatment modality for prostate cancer. Improved visualization, dexterity, and precision afforded by the da Vinci robot allow a precise dissection of the neurovascular bundles. We objectively assessed erectile function after robot-assisted extraperitoneal prostatectomy by using the SHIM (IIEF-5) validated questionnaire. METHODS: Between July 2003 and September 2004, 150 consecutive men underwent da Vinci robot-assisted extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. The IIEF-5 questionnaire was used to assess postoperative potency in 67 patients who were at least 6 months postsurgery. Erectile function was classified as impotent (<11), moderate dysfunction (11 to 15), mild dysfunction (16 to 21), and potent (22 to 25). All patients used oral pharmacological assistance postprocedure. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were available to complete the IIEF-5 questionnaire 6 months to 1 year postprostatectomy. Twelve patients were excluded from the study who abstained from all sexual activity after surgery for emotional or social reasons. Of the 55 patients evaluated, 22 (40%) were impotent, 3 (5.5%) had moderate erectile dysfunction (ED), 12 (21.8%) had mild ED, and 18 (32.7%) were fully potent. The table compares IIEF-5 scores with nerve-sparing status. Of patients who had bilateral nerve sparing, 28/45 (62.2%) had mild or no ED within 6 to 12 months postsurgery, and all expressed satisfaction with their current sexual function or rate of improvement after robotic prostatectomy. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted extraperitoneal prostatectomy provides comparable outcomes to those of open surgery with regards to erectile function. Assessment of the ultimate maximal erectile function will require continued analysis, as this is likely to further improve beyond 6 to 12 months.     

Patient-reported validated functional outcome after extraperitoneal robotic-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Erectile function after prostate surgery is an important criterion for patients when they are choosing a treatment modality for prostate cancer. Improved visualization, dexterity, and precision afforded by the da Vinci robot allow a precise dissection of the neurovascular bundles. We objectively assessed erectile function after robot-assisted extraperitoneal prostatectomy by using the SHIM (IIEF-5) validated questionnaire. METHODS: Between July 2003 and September 2004, 150 consecutive men underwent da Vinci robot-assisted extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. The IIEF-5 questionnaire was used to assess postoperative potency in 67 patients who were at least 6 months postsurgery. Erectile function was classified as impotent (<11), moderate dysfunction (11 to 15), mild dysfunction (16 to 21), and potent (22 to 25). All patients used oral pharmacological assistance postprocedure. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were available to complete the IIEF-5 questionnaire 6 months to 1 year postprostatectomy. Twelve patients were excluded from the study who abstained from all sexual activity after surgery for emotional or social reasons. Of the 55 patients evaluated, 22 (40%) were impotent, 3 (5.5%) had moderate ED, 12 (21.8%) had mild ED, and 18 (32.7%) were fully potent. The table compares IIEF-5 scores with nerve-sparing status. Of patients who had bilateral nerve sparing, 28/45 (62.2%) had mild or no ED within 6 to 12 months postsurgery, and all expressed satisfaction with their current sexual function or rate of improvement after robotic prostatectomy. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted extraperitoneal prostatectomy provides comparable outcomes to those of open surgery with regards to erectile function. Assessment of the ultimate maximal erectile function will require continued analysis, as this is likely to further improve beyond 6 to 12 months.     

Resection margin status in radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens: relationship to type of operation, tumor size, tumor grade and local tumor extension

Since the introduction of the nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy, there has been a steady increase in the number of prostatic cancer cases treated operatively and concern with the frequency of positive resection margins has developed. To identify factors that determine resection margin status the hospital charts of 199 radical retropubic prostatectomy patients from 1980 to 1987 were reviewed, as well as slides from 52 patients in 1987. Of the 199 patients 92 (46%) had positive resection margins; there was no difference in the frequency between the nerve-sparing and standard procedures. The 1987 slide review showed a positive resection margin frequency of 58%. The presence and extent of positive resection margins were directly related to tumor size. The positive resection margin frequency also increased with poorly differentiated carcinoma, capsular penetration and seminal vesicle involvement. Determination of these risk factors identifies patients at greatest risk for positive resection margins.     

前列腺癌根治术132例临床分析

目的总结行前列腺癌根治术的经验和教训,对手术疗效和影响患者生活质量的因素进行分析。方法1993年1月至2005年3月共开展前列腺癌根治手术132例,按照手术的时间,将患者分为早期组（2000年前,34例）和近期组（2001年后,98例）,分别统计围手术期各指标情况,对近期组中63例患者的随访结果进行分析;对78例患者的阴茎勃起功能状况进行跟踪调查,其中19例行阴茎夜间生物电阻抗体积测定（NEVA）检查。结果近期组和早期组相比,与手术技术相关的指标逐渐优化。随访的病例中无死于前列腺癌者;以血清前列腺特异抗原（PSA）〉0．4μg／L为标准,有9例生化复发。50例在术后6个月内恢复正常排尿,压力性尿失禁8例,完全性尿失禁5例。4例出现膀胱颈部尿道狭窄。56例保留双侧神经患者中,33例（58．9％）恢复勃起功能;22例保留单侧神经患者中,7例（31．8％）恢复勃起功能;19例行NEVA检查者中,动脉供血不足者14例,4例恢复勃起功能;静脉漏者5例,均未恢复勃起功能。结论前列腺癌根治术治疗局限性前列腺癌效果较好。熟悉前列腺解剖,保护血管神经束以及良好的手术技巧,是手术成功的关键,也是影响患者术后生活质量的重要因素。     

Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: extraprostatic tumor extension and preservation of erectile function

A total of 52 patients underwent a nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinical stage A or B prostatic cancer. The incidence of positive surgical margins (18 per cent of the patients with stages A and B1, and 57 per cent with stage B2 disease) was not significantly different (p less than 0.5) from that of 25 patients who underwent a standard radical retropubic prostatectomy by the same surgeon (18 per cent with stages A and B1, and 50 per cent with stage B2 cancer). Of 42 patients who were sexually potent preoperatively 41 (98 per cent) have had partial return of erectile function and 22 (52 per cent) have had return of erections sufficient for vaginal penetration. No correlation between clinical or pathological stage and postoperative potency was observed. Erections sufficient for penetration returned in 67 per cent of the patients less than 60 and 43 per cent of those more than 60 years old. The results suggest that with the nerve-sparing modification of radical retropubic prostatectomy sexual function can be preserved in the majority of patients with clinical stage A or B prostatic cancer without compromising the adequacy of tumor excision.     

Nervenerhaltende radikale Prostatektomie mit niedrig dosiertem Sildenafil

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of low-dose sildenafil (25 mg) for rehabilitation of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Patients and methods

In a prospective study, 43 sexually active patients underwent nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy. Rigiscan® measurement of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR) was carried out 7–14 days after surgery. A group of 23 patients with preserved nocturnal erections received sildenafil 25 mg/day at night to support recovery of erectile function. A control group of 18 patients underwent follow-up without PDE-5 inhibitors. Evaluation using the IIEF-5 questionnaire was performed 6, 12, 24, 36, 52 and 78 weeks after the operation.

Results

Of 43 patients, 41 (95%) showed 1–5 erections during the first night after catheter removal. In the group receiving daily sildenafil, the mean IIEF-5 score decreased or increased from 20.8 preoperatively to 3.6 at 6 weeks, 3.8 at 12 weeks, 5.9 at 24 weeks, 9.6 at 36 weeks, 14.1 at 52 weeks and 19.3 at 78 weeks after prostatectomy. In the control group, the mean preoperative IIEF-5 score of 21.2 decreased or increased to 2.4 at 6 weeks, 3.8 at 12 weeks, 5.3 at 24 weeks, 6.4 at 36 weeks, 9.3 at 52 weeks and 13.2 at 78 weeks. Statistical evaluation showed significant differences regarding the IIEF-5 score and recovery period of erectile function between the groups (p<0.001), with potency rates of 92 vs 68%.

Conclusion

The measurement of NPTR after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy showed erectile function as early as the first night after catheter removal. In cases of early penile erections, daily low-dose PDE-5 inhibitors lead to a significant improvement/acceleration of erectile function recovery.     

Effect of radical retropubic prostatectomy on erectile function, evaluated before and after surgery using colour Doppler ultrasonography and nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of radical retropubic prostatectomy on erectile function, by evaluating objectively patients' erectile function before and after surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 126 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who were scheduled to undergo radical retropubic prostatectomy. After giving informed consent for the study, 123 patients underwent intracavernosal injection tests, colour Doppler ultrasonography and nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring before and after surgery. RESULTS: From the intracavernosal injection tests and nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring, 21 patients (17%) were evaluated as having normal erectile function before surgery. After radical retropubic prostatectomy, nine (43%) of these 21 potent men had preserved erectile function. In eight patients whose neurovascular bundles were preserved, five were potent after surgery. The cause of erectile function after surgery was a neurogenic disorder in seven and a related vascular disorder in five. CONCLUSION: From objective tests of erectile function on patients scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy, 17% had normal erectile function. However, even after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy, the proportion retaining potency was unsatisfactory. Although a neurological disorder was the main cause of erectile dysfunction after surgery, vascular disorders were also important.