Diagnostic subtypes of bipolar disorder in older versus younger adults

OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in diagnostic subtypes of bipolar disorder as according to ICD-10 between patients whose first contact with psychiatric health care occurs late in life (over 50 years of age) and patients who have first contact earlier in life (50 years of age or below). METHODS: From 1994 to 2002 all patients who received a diagnosis of a manic episode or bipolar disorder at initial contact with the mental healthcare system, whether outpatient or inpatient, were identified in Denmark's nationwide register. RESULTS: A total of 852 (49.6%) patients, who were over age 50, and 867 patients, who were 50 or below, received a diagnosis of a manic episode or bipolar disorder at the first contact ever. Older inpatients presented with psychotic symptoms (35.4%) significantly less than younger inpatients (42.6%) due specifically to a lower prevalence of manic episodes with psychotic symptoms. Conversely, older inpatients more often presented with severe depressive episodes with psychotic symptoms than younger inpatients (32.0% versus 17.0%). Among outpatients, no significant differences were found between patients older than 50 years and patients 50 years of age or younger. However, a bimodal distribution of age at first outpatient contact was found with an intermode of 65 years and outpatients older than 65 years more often presented with severe depressive episodes with psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar patients who are older at first psychiatric hospitalization (>50 years) present less with psychotic manic episodes and more with severe depressive episodes with psychosis than younger patients. The distribution of age at first outpatient contact is bimodal with an intermode of 65 years and outpatients older than 65 years more often present with severe depressive episodes with psychosis.     

Gender differences in patients presenting with a single depressive episode according to ICD-10

Abstract Background It is unsure whether men and women present with different subtypes of depression. The aim of the study was to compare the prevalence of subtypes of a single depressive episode according to ICD-10 for men and women in a nationwide sample of all patients treated in psychiatric in- or outpatient settings. Methods All patients who got a diagnosis of a single depressive episode in a period from 1994 to 2002 at the end of the first outpatient treatment ever or at the first discharge from psychiatric hospitalisation ever in Denmark were identified in a nationwide register. Results A total of 18,192 patients got a diagnosis of a single depressive episode at the first outpatient contact ever and 8,396 patients got a diagnosis of a single depressive episode at the first psychiatric hospitalisation ever. Significantly more women were treated as outpatients than as inpatients (68 % vs. 60.4 %). In outpatient settings, women slightly more often presented with milder types of depression than with severe depression, but no gender difference was found in the severity of depressive episodes among hospitalised patients. No differences were found between genders in the prevalence of depression with vs. without melancholic or psychotic symptoms in either of the settings. Women were treated for longer periods in both settings. Conclusions The distributions of the subtypes of a single depressive episode are remarkably similar for male and female patients with first contact to the psychiatric health care system.     

The prevalence of mixed episodes during the course of illness in bipolar disorder

Objective: To investigate the prevalence of mixed episodes during the course of illness in bipolar disorder. Method: A total of 1620 patients with an ICD‐10 diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder at the first psychiatric contact were identified in a period from 1994 to 2003 in Denmark and the prevalence of mixed, depressive and hypomanic/manic episodes were calculated at each episode. Results: The prevalence of mixed episodes increased from the first episode to the tenth episode, however, only for women (6.7% of the first episodes leading to psychiatric care compared with 18.2% of the tenth episodes). For men, the prevalence of mixed episodes was constantly low. At all episodes, the presence of a current mixed episode increased the risk substantially of getting a future mixed episode. Conclusion: Clinicians should pay more attention to mixed episodes, especially among women, as they may represent an increasing treatment challenge as the illness progress.     

Gender differences in subtypes of late-onset depression and mania

BACKGROUND: It is currently not known whether elderly men and women present with different subtypes of depression and mania/bipolar disorder. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of subtypes of a single depressive episode and mania/bipolar disorder according to the ICD-10 for elderly men and women in a nationwide sample of all out- and inpatients in psychiatric settings. METHODS: All patients older than 65 years who received a diagnosis of a single depressive episode and mania/bipolar disorder in the period from 1994 to 2002 at the end of their first outpatient treatment or at their first discharge from psychiatric hospitalization in Denmark were identified in a nationwide register. RESULTS: A total of 9837 patients aged more than 65 years received a diagnosis of a single depressive episode (69.9% were women) and 443 a diagnosis of mania/bipolar disorder (61.6% were women) at the end of their first contact with psychiatric health care. Slightly more women than men received a diagnosis of mild (70.8%) or moderate depression (67.4%) compared to severe depression (65.9%). Men more often presented with a single depressive episode with comorbid substance abuse or comorbid somatic illness. No gender differences were found in the prevalence of depression with or without melancholic or psychotic symptoms. Men more often presented with mania/bipolar disorder with comorbid substance abuse. CONCLUSIONS: The distributions of the subtypes of a single depressive episode or mania/bipolar disorder are remarkably similar for male and female patients aged over 65 years with first contact with the psychiatric health-care system.     

Comparison of rapid-cycling and non-rapid-cycling bipolar disorder based on prospective mood ratings in 539 outpatients

OBJECTIVE: To detect risk factors for rapid cycling in bipolar disorder, the authors compared characteristics of rapid-cycling and non-rapid-cycling patients both from a categorical and a dimensional perspective. METHOD: Outpatients with bipolar I disorder (N=419), bipolar II disorder (N=104), and bipolar disorder not otherwise specified (N=16) were prospectively evaluated with daily mood ratings for 1 year. Subjects were classified as having rapid cycling (defined by the DSM-IV criterion of four or more manic or depressive episodes within 1 year) or not having rapid cycling, and the two groups' demographic and retrospective and prospective illness characteristics were compared. Associated factors were also evaluated in relationship to episode frequency. RESULTS: Patients with rapid cycling (N=206; 38.2%) significantly differed from those without rapid cycling (N=333) with respect to the following independent variables: history of childhood physical and/or sexual abuse, bipolar I disorder subtype, number of lifetime manic or depressive episodes, history of rapid cycling, and history of drug abuse. The prevalence of these characteristics increased progressively with episode frequency. The proportion of women was greater than the proportion of men only among patients with eight or more episodes per year. The average time spent manic/hypomanic increased as a function of episode frequency, but the average time spent depressed was comparable in patients with one episode and in those with more than one episode. Brief episodes were as frequent as full-duration DSM-IV-defined episodes. CONCLUSIONS: A number of heterogeneous risk factors were progressively associated with increasing episode frequency. Depression predominated in all bipolar disorder patients, but patients with rapid cycling were more likely to be characterized by manic features. The findings overall suggest that rapid cycling is a dimensional course specifier arbitrarily defined on a continuum of episode frequency.     

Differences in diagnostic subtypes among patients with late and early onset of a single depressive episode

OBJECTIVE: It is unclear whether patients with late onset and patients with early onset present with different subtypes of depression. The aim of the study was to compare the prevalence of subtypes of ICD-10 single depressive episodes for patients with late onset (age >65 years) and patient with early onset (age < or = 65 years) in a nationwide sample of all patients discharged from psychiatric in- or outpatient settings. METHOD: All patients who got a diagnosis of a single depressive episode in a period from 1994-2002 at the end of the first outpatient treatment or at the first discharge from psychiatric hospitalisation ever in Denmark were identified in a nationwide register. RESULTS: In total, 18.192 patients were given a diagnosis of a single depressive episode at the first outpatient contact and 8.396 patients were given a diagnosis of a single depressive episode at the first psychiatric hospitalisation ever. Patients with late onset were more often women, more often presented with a severe depressive episode and more often with psychosis than patients with early onset, in both inpatient and outpatient treatment settings. No differences were found between patients with late and patients with early onset in the prevalence of depression with or without melancholic symptoms-in either of the treatment settings. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a late onset first depressive episode are more often women and are clinically characterised by more severe depressions and a higher prevalence of psychosis than patients with early onset.     

Revisiting depressive-prone bipolar disorder: polarity of initial mood episode and disease course among bipolar I systematic treatment enhancement program for bipolar disorder participants.

BACKGROUND: We examined the hypothesis that a first depressive rather than manic episode in bipolar disorder might herald a subsequent course notable for greater burden of depressive symptoms. METHODS: We analyzed retrospective data on the polarity of first mood episode obtained from 704 bipolar I subjects entering the multicenter Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) study. Subjects with an initial manic or depressive episode and those in whom both poles occurred within the same year were compared. RESULTS: Depressive-onset bipolar disorder was more common in women and those with earlier onset of illness. Adjusting for these differences, it was significantly associated with more lifetime depressive episodes and a greater proportion of time with depression and anxiety in the year prior to study entry. CONCLUSIONS: Polarity of first mood episode may be useful in distinguishing subsets of bipolar patients at risk for a more chronic course.     

Antidepressant-associated switches from depression to mania in severe bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether switching from depression to mania is part of the natural history of bipolar illness or results from antidepressant (AD) treatment by examining bipolar patients with psychosis early in their illness course. METHODS: A multi-facility cohort of 123 first-admission inpatients, aged 15-60 years, with DSM-IV bipolar disorder (BD) with psychotic features, was followed for four years, and 76 individuals experienced at least one episode of depression. Frequency of and risk factors for switches from depression to mania, time to switch, and duration of the subsequent manic episode were examined in relation to AD use (with anti-manic and/or antipsychotic medications). RESULTS: The 76 respondents experienced 113 depressive episodes. Those prescribed ADs had more depressive episodes and spent more time depressed than non-users. A total of 23 depressive episodes in 17 respondents ended in a manic/hypomanic/mixed episode (20%). The time to switch and duration of the subsequent manic episode were not significantly different for the seven respondents and nine episodes involving AD treatment versus the 10 respondents and 14 episodes without ADs. None of the risk factors (age of onset 相似文献   

单相抑郁与双相障碍住院患者地塞米松抑制试验的对照研究

目的 通过地塞米松抑制试验(DST)了解单相抑郁和双相障碍患者在不同情绪状态下的下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴功能改变情况. 方法对38例单相抑郁住院患者和63例双相障碍住院患者(双相障碍Ⅰ型19例,双相障碍Ⅱ型44例;双相障碍抑郁发作者33例,双相障碍躁狂发作者18例,双相障碍混合发作者12例)进行DST,其中17例单相抑郁、35例双相障碍患者在治疗4周后再次行DST,比较各组DST脱抑制率差异.结果 治疗前,单相抑郁的DST脱抑制率(36.8%)与双相障碍(14.3%)、双相障碍Ⅰ型(10.5%)、双相障碍Ⅱ型(15.9%)以及双相障碍抑郁发作(15.2%)之间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);双相障碍Ⅰ型(10.5%)与双相障碍Ⅱ型(15.9%)之间,双相障碍抑郁发作(15.2%)、双相障碍混合发作(16.7%)和双相障碍躁狂发作(11.1%)两两比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗后,DST脱抑制率在上述各组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗后单相抑郁的DST脱抑制率随着病情改善而降低,但较治疗前差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),双相障碍的DST脱抑制率在治疗前后比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论在疾病期,单相抑郁的DST脱抑制率高于双相障碍;双相障碍的DST脱抑制率与临床分型、发作类型、病情无关.     

Predictors of recurrence in bipolar disorder: primary outcomes from the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD)

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about clinical features associated with the risk of recurrence in patients with bipolar disorder receiving treatment according to contemporary practice guidelines. The authors looked for the features associated with risk of recurrence. METHOD: The authors examined prospective data from a cohort of patients with bipolar disorder participating in the multicenter Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) study for up to 24 months. For those who were symptomatic at study entry but subsequently achieved recovery, time to recurrence of mania, hypomania, mixed state, or a depressive episode was examined with Cox regression. RESULTS: Of 1,469 participants symptomatic at study entry, 858 (58.4%) subsequently achieved recovery. During up to 2 years of follow-up, 416 (48.5%) of these individuals experienced recurrences, with more than twice as many developing depressive episodes (298, 34.7%) as those who developed manic, hypomanic, or mixed episodes (118, 13.8%). The time until 25% of the individuals experienced a depressive episode was 21.4 weeks and until 25% experienced a manic/hypomanic/mixed episode was 85.0 weeks. Residual depressive or manic symptoms at recovery and proportion of days depressed or anxious in the preceding year were significantly associated with shorter time to depressive recurrence. Residual manic symptoms at recovery and proportion of days of elevated mood in the preceding year were significantly associated with shorter time to manic, hypomanic, or mixed episode recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence was frequent and associated with the presence of residual mood symptoms at initial recovery. Targeting residual symptoms in maintenance treatment may represent an opportunity to reduce risk of recurrence.     

The efficacy of lamotrigine in rapid cycling and non-rapid cycling patients with bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) who have rapid cycling features are often treatment refractory. Clear and conclusive evidence regarding effective treatments for this group is not available. METHODS: Patients with diagnoses of refractory bipolar disorder who were currently experiencing manic, mixed, depressive, or hypomanic episodes were treated with lamotrigine as add-on therapy (60 patients) or monotherapy (15 patients). We compared the efficacy of lamotrigine in the 41 rapid cycling and 34 non-rapid cycling patients with BD. RESULTS: Improvement from baseline to last visit was significant among both rapid cycling and non-rapid cycling patients for both depressive and manic symptomatology. For patients entering the study in a depressive episode, improvement in depressive symptomatology was equivalent in the two groups. Among patients entering the study in a manic, mixed, or hypomanic episode, those with rapid cycling improved less in manic symptomatology than did non-rapid cycling patients. Among rapid cycling patients with initial mild-to-moderate manic symptom severity, improvement was comparable to that in non-rapid cycling subjects; however, the subset of rapid cycling patients with severe initial manic symptomatology had little improvement in mania. Rapid cycling patients had earlier onset and more lifetime episodes of mania, depression, and mixed mania. CONCLUSIONS: Lamotrigine was generally effective and well tolerated in this group of previously non-responsive, rapid cycling bipolar patients.     

Is bipolar disorder specifically associated with aggression?

Ballester J, Goldstein T, Goldstein B, Obreja M, Axelson D, Monk K, Hickey MB, Iyengar S, Farchione T, Kupfer DJ, Brent D, Birmaher B. Is bipolar disorder specifically associated with aggression? Bipolar Disord 2012: 14: 283–290. © 2012 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objective: Several studies have suggested that bipolar disorder (BP) in adults is associated with aggressive behaviors. However, most studies have included only inpatients and have not taken into consideration possible confounding factors. The goal of the present study was to compare the prevalence of aggression in subjects with BP compared to subjects with other, non‐BP psychopathology and healthy controls. Methods: Subjects with bipolar I disorder (BP‐I) and bipolar II disorder (BP‐II) (n = 255), non‐BP psychopathology (n = 85), and healthy controls (n = 84) were recruited. Aggression was measured using the Aggression Questionnaire (AQ). Group comparisons were adjusted for demographic and clinical differences (e.g., comorbid disorders) and multiple comparisons. The effects of the subtype of BP, current versus past episode, polarity of current episode, psychosis, the presence of irritable mania/hypomania only, and pharmacological treatment were examined. Results: Subjects with BP showed significantly higher total and subscale AQ scores (raw and T‐scores) when compared to subjects with non‐BP psychopathology and healthy controls. Exclusion of subjects with current mood episodes and those with common comorbid disorders yielded similar results. There were no effects of BP subtype, polarity of the current episode, irritable manic/hypomanic episodes only, or current use of pharmacological treatments. Independent of the severity of BP and polarity of the episode, those in a current mood episode showed significantly higher AQ scores than those not in a current mood episode. Subjects with current psychosis showed significantly higher total AQ score, hostility, and anger than those without current psychosis. Conclusions: Subjects with BP display greater rates of anger and aggressive behaviors, especially during acute and psychotic episodes. Early identification and management of these behaviors is warranted.     

双相情感障碍混合相临床特征对照研究

目的:了解双相情感障碍混合相的临床特征。方法:收集42例双相情感障碍混合相患者(混合组)与93例无混合发作的双相情感障碍躁狂相的患者(躁狂组)住院治疗的临床资料进行对比。结果:混合组年龄稍低,多见于女性和独身者,性格多为外向型或中间型,首次发作多为抑郁,多伴有精神病性症状及自杀意念和企图。多元逐步回归分析提示,混合发作与自杀意念和企图、性格、性别、首次发作形式有显著的相关性。混合组具有易被误诊、住院时间长、疗效较差的特点。结论:双相情感障碍混合相临床表现具有特殊性、严重性及相应的难治性,应加强重视。     

精神分裂症和双相情感障碍住院患者家属的生活质量及社会支持状况

目的：探讨精神分裂症和双相情感障碍（躁狂发作或抑郁发作及混合发作）住院患者家属生活质量及社会支持状况。方法以精神分裂症和双相情感障碍住院患者的家属为研究对象,进行一般调查表（自制）、简明健康调查量表（SF－36）、社会支持评定量表（SSRS）等检测,并对结果进行统计分析。结果（1）精神分裂症和双相情感障碍住院患者家属生活质量的各项指标均低于全国平均水平,差异有统计学意义（P ＜0．01）。（2）精神分裂症和双相情感障碍住院患者家属社会支持总分与全国常模比较,差异无统计学意义（P ＞0．05）;患者家属文化程度越高,获得的社会支持情况越好,但差异无统计学意义（P ＞0．05）;双相情感障碍患者家人获得的社会支持状况好于精神分裂症患者家属,差异有统计学意义（ P＝0．049）。结论精神分裂症和双相情感障碍住院患者家属的生活质量令人担忧,这可能与疾病的特点有关。     

Prevalence of antithyroid antibodies in mood disorders

We examined the prevalence of antimicrosomal and antithyroglobulin antibodies in psychiatric inpatients with unipolar depression (N = 218), bipolar disorder manic (N = 51), bipolar disorder depressed (N = 19), and bipolar disorder mixed (N = 26) in comparison with two control groups: psychiatric inpatients with adjustment disorder (N = 80) and family medicine outpatients without current psychiatric illness (N = 144). A statistical analysis that controlled for age and sex revealed the frequency of positive antibody titers not to be increased in patients with a diagnosis of unipolar depression (6.9%) or bipolar disorder manic (3.9%), when compared with patients with adjustment disorder (2.5%) and non-psychiatric subjects (6.9%). There was a weak trend toward an increased prevalence of antithyroid antibodies in patients with bipolar disorder, mixed (19%) or depressed subtype (16%). The excess occurrence of antibodies in patients with either mixed or depressed bipolar disorder did not appear to be related to lithium exposure, which was similar in all bipolar subgroups. When the intervening influences of age and sex are taken into account, unipolar depression does not appear to be associated with an excessive rate of antithyroid antibodies; however thyroid autoimmunity may be weakly associated with subtypes of bipolar disorder in which depressive symptoms are prominent. Depression and Anxiety 5:91–96, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc     

The clinical characteristics of DSM-IV bipolar I and II disorders: baseline findings from the Jorvi Bipolar Study (JoBS)

OBJECTIVE: To obtain a comprehensive view of the clinical epidemiology of bipolar I and II disorder in secondary-level psychiatric settings. METHODS: In the Jorvi Bipolar Study (JoBS), 1630 non-schizophrenic psychiatric in- and outpatients in three Finnish cities were screened for bipolar I and II disorders with the Mood Disorder Questionnaire. Diagnoses were made using semistructured SCID-I and -II interviews. Information collected included clinical history, current episode, symptom status, and other characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 191 patients with bipolar disorder (90 bipolar I and 101 bipolar II) were included in the JoBS. The majority of bipolar II (50.5%) and many bipolar I (25.6%) patients were previously undiagnosed; the remainder had a median 7.8 years delay from first episode to diagnosis. Despite several lifetime episodes, 26 and 58% of bipolar I and II patients, respectively, had never been hospitalized. A polyphasic episode was current in 51.3%, rapid cycling in 32.5%, and psychotic symptoms in 16.2% of patients. Mixed episodes occurred in 16.7% of bipolar I, and depressive mixed states in 25.7% of bipolar II patients. CONCLUSION: Even in psychiatric settings, bipolar disorders usually go undetected, or recognized only after a long delay. A significant proportion of not only bipolar II, but also bipolar I patients are never hospitalized. Polyphasic episodes and rapid cycling are prevalent in both types. Depressive mixed states are at least as common among bipolar II patients as mixed episodes among bipolar I.     

Differences in Axis I and II comorbidity between bipolar I and II disorders and major depressive disorder

OBJECTIVE: To obtain a comprehensive view of differences in current comorbidity between bipolar I and II disorders (BD) and (unipolar) major depressive disorder (MDD), and Axis I and II comorbidity in BD in secondary-care psychiatric settings. METHOD: The psychiatric comorbidity of 90 bipolar I and 101 bipolar II patients from the Jorvi Bipolar Study and 269 MDD patients from the Vantaa Depression Study were compared. We used DSM-IV criteria assessed by semistructured interviews. Patients were inpatients and outpatients from secondary-care psychiatric units. Comparable information was collected on clinical history, index episode, symptom status, and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Bipolar disorder and MDD differed in prevalences of current comorbid disorders, MDD patients having significantly more Axis I comorbidity (69.1% vs. 57.1%), specifically anxiety disorders (56.5% vs. 44.5%) and cluster A (19.0% vs. 9.9%) and C (31.6% vs. 23.0%) personality disorders. In contrast, BD had more single cluster B personality disorders (30.9% vs. 24.6%). Bipolar I and bipolar II were similar in current overall comorbidity, but the prevalence of comorbidity was strongly associated with the current illness phase. CONCLUSIONS: Major depressive disorder and BD have somewhat different patterns in the prevalences of comorbid disorders at the time of an illness episode, with differences particularly in the prevalences of anxiety and personality disorders. Current illness phase explains differences in psychiatric comorbidity of BD patients better than type of disorder.     

Observational study designs for bipolar disorder — What can they tell us about treatment in acute mania?

Randomised controlled trials may have generalisability limitations when applied to the complex treatment of patients with bipolar disorder. Observational study designs can inform us about the diversity of bipolar disorder treatment in naturalistic settings. The aim of this paper was to describe the treatments prescribed for acute mania in a large prospective observational study of bipolar disorder. Patients with a manic/mixed episode were enrolled in EMBLEM (European Mania in Bipolar Longitudinal Evaluation of Medication) if they initiated or changed oral medication with antipsychotics, lithium and/or anticonvulsants. The use of monotherapy or combination therapy for treatment of acute mania, concomitant medications and rate of treatment switching during the 12-week acute treatment phase were assessed. Of the 3459 patients, 36% were treated with one drug and 64% with combination therapy. 55% of patients initiating combination therapy started on an atypical antipsychotic plus lithium or an anticonvulsant. Patients prescribed combination therapy at baseline were more clinically severe, were more often treated as inpatients and had more manic episodes in the previous year compared with the monotherapy group. Treatment switching occurred in 54.4% of patients over the 12-week acute phase. Many patients were taking at least one concomitant medication at baseline (69.4%) and week 12 (50.5%). The results of this observational study show that treatment for mania is complex with multiple combinations of treatment and frequent switching during an acute episode.     

Predictors of switch from depression to mania in bipolar disorder

Manic switch is a relevant issue when treating bipolar depression. Some risk factors have been suggested, but unequivocal findings are lacking. We therefore investigated predictors of switch from depression to mania in the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) sample. Manic switch was defined as a depressive episode followed by a (hypo)manic or mixed episode within the following 12 weeks. We assessed possible predictors of switch using generalized linear mixed models (GLMM).8403 episodes without switch and 512 episodes with switch (1720 subjects) were included in the analysis. Several baseline variables were associated with a higher risk of switch. They were younger age, previous history of: rapid cycling, severe manic symptoms, suicide attempts, amphetamine use and some pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments. During the current depressive episode, the identified risk factors were: any possible mood elevation, multiple mania-associated symptoms with at least moderate severity, and comorbid panic attacks.In conclusion, our study suggests that both characteristics of the disease history and clinical features of the current depressive episode may be risk factors for manic switch.