Acute growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hexapeptide in humans is independent of endogenous GH-releasing hormone.

The synthetic GH-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP: His-DTrp-Ala-Trp-DPhe-Lys-NH2) releases GH in man by an undetermined mechanism. To investigate whether acute GH response to GHRP is mediated by endogenous GHRH, we examined the effect of GHRP on GH release during pituitary desensitization to GHRH induced by short-term GHRH infusion. In five healthy men on six occasions, we infused saline (sal) or 1 microgram/kg.h GHRH-44 for 6 h. After 4 h, a bolus of sal, GHRH-44 1 microgram/kg body weight, or GHRP 1 microgram/kg body weight was given iv. GH concentration, measured by RIA, was analyzed by mean area under the curve (AUC) of GH released over the 2 h immediately after bolus injection. Infusion of GHRH had a biphasic effect on GH release; plasma GH increased to 12.7 +/- 3.3 micrograms/L within the first hour, with subsequent decrease to 2.9 +/- 0.3 micrograms/L during the last 2 h of infusion. GH AUC (hours 4-6 of infusion) microgram/L.2 h [table: see text] GH response to bolus GHRH was abolished by GHRH infusion, whereas GH response to GHRP persisted under the same conditions. Thus, we conclude that acute GH response to GHRP in humans is not mediated by endogenous GHRH.     

Sexual dimorphism of pyridostigmine potentiation of growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone-induced GH release in humans

Sex differences in the neuroregulation of GH secretion are not now known in humans. To investigate whether activation of cholinergic tone by pyridostigmine could cause a sex-related difference in the pituitary responsiveness to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), we have studied the GH response to GHRH in 16 normal subjects (8 men and 8 women) tested after oral placebo or different doses of pyridostigmine (30, 60, and 120 mg). Each subject presented a normal response after iv administration of 50 micrograms GHRH and placebo. In men each dose of pyridostigmine induced a significant increase in the GH response to GHRH, as assessed by both the maximal GH peak and the area under GH curve. In women, on the contrary, the GH response to GHRH was not potentiated by pretreatment with pyridostigmine at any given dose. Only five female subjects were tested with 120 mg pyridostigmine because of the severe side-effects of the drug at this dosage. Our present data strongly suggest that in humans there is a sex-related difference in the neuroregulation of GH secretion and this is probably expressed through a different cholinergic tone.     

Inhibition by prednisone of growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone in normal men

Glucocorticoids increase GHRH-stimulated GH secretion when added in vitro to cultured monkey, rat, and human pituitary cells and when injected in vivo into anesthetized rats. Yet, in man glucocorticoids inhibit linear growth and GH secretion. To clarify this apparent disparity and to determine if glucocorticoid stimulation can augment GH release in man after direct pituitary stimulation with GHRH, we administered 1 microgram/kg GHRH dosage to seven normal men before and after a 4-day course of prednisone (20 mg, orally, three times daily). The second GHRH test was done 12 h after the last dose of prednisone was given. Prednisone significantly inhibited the mean maximal increase in serum GH after GHRH treatment [20.7 +/- 4.5 (+/- SE) vs. 6.3 +/- 2.4 micrograms/L; P less than 0.01] as well as the GH value obtained by summing and averaging the individual means of the 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 min serum GH concentrations (11.1 +/- 1.2 vs. 4.3 +/- 0.9 micrograms/L; P less than 0.05). The mean serum insulin-like growth factor I and plasma glucose concentrations were not significantly altered by prednisone administration. These results together with previous in vitro findings imply that glucocorticoid-induced inhibition of GH secretion in man does not occur at the level of the pituitary gland, but, rather, at the hypothalamus or above.     

Responses of growth hormone (GH) and somatomedin-C to GH-releasing hormone in healthy aging men

Although controversy exists regarding the effects of aging on GH secretory responses to indirect stimulation, in the only prior study of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-mediated GH secretion decreased GH responsivity occurred in healthy men after age 40 yr. We measured serum GH before and up to 180 min after and somatomedin-C (SM-C) levels before and 24 h after single morning bolus iv injections of GHRH-(1-44)-NH2 (1 microgram/kg) in 50 healthy fasted men, aged 21-86 yr, from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Only subjects with a body mass index (BMI; kilograms per m2) between 20.0 and 29.0 were studied. Basal serum GH levels were undetectable (less than 0.7 ng/ml) in all but 2 men. Neither the frequency of GH responses (P greater than 0.8), the magnitude of response (P greater than 0.2), nor the timing (P greater than 0.05) of the peak GH responses to GHRH were significantly altered with age. Although BMI values did not vary significantly with age in our study group, there was a significant negative correlation (r = -0.37; P less than 0.01) of peak GH with BMI. Regression analysis revealed a slight but significant increase in the level of fasting blood sugar with age, but no significant correlation between fasting blood sugar and peak GH levels. Serum levels of SM-C were significantly lower in older men both before (P less than 0.001) and 24 h after (P less than 0.02) GHRH injection. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed significant (P less than 0.001) responses of SM-C to endogenous GH elevations produced by GHRH at all ages, but no age-dependent alterations in the magnitudes of these responses (P greater than 0.7). Our findings suggest that increasing age in adult men has little effect on the secretory responsiveness of pituitary somatotropes to GHRH. However, the finding of lower serum levels of SM-C with intact SM-C responsivity to endogenous GH is compatible with prior observations of an age-related decrease in the total daily spontaneous secretion of GH.     

Bromocriptine does not alter growth hormone (GH) responsiveness to GH-releasing hormone in acromegaly

GHRH (100 micrograms) and TRH (200 micrograms) were administered to 24 active acromegalic patients before and during chronic bromocriptine (Br) treatment (Br, 10-15 mg/day for 3-5 months) to evaluate the possible effects of the dopamine agonist on GH release induced by these releasing hormones. Mean daily plasma GH levels were reduced by Br treatment from 34 +/- 40 (SD) to 16 +/- 19 ng/ml (P less than 0.01). No significant changes were found when comparing the GH response to GHRH as mean area under the response curve (nanograms per min/ml above the basal) (pretreatment, 5453 +/- 7843; during Br, 7017 +/- 12763 ng/ml . min), and as mean individual peak GH values (pretreatment, 130 +/- 148; during Br, 126 +/- 187 ng/ml) before and during treatment. The percentage GH increase (pretreatment, 340 +/- 354; during Br, 617 +/- 539%) was however significantly higher during Br. Br treatment significantly reduced the GH response to TRH in terms of mean of individual peak levels (from 136 +/- 134 to 60 +/- 52 ng/ml; P less than 0.01) and area under the response curve (from 3142 +/- 3998 to 1331 +/- 1646 ng/min . ml; P less than 0.01). However, the percentage GH increase was not significantly different (pretreatment, 486 +/- 729; during Br, 1059 +/- 1862%). When the patients were divided into Br responders, i.e. mean daily GH reduction during Br of at least 50% below baseline, and nonresponders, the initial response to GHRH was significantly higher in the latter group, but was unaffected by Br treatment in either group. On the contrary, the response to TRH, statistically significant initially only in the Br responder group, was reduced by Br treatment. We suggest that cells sensitive to Br and TRH but not to GHRH (lactotroph-like) and cells sensitive to GHRH but not to Br (pure somatotrophs) may coexist in GH-secreting adenomas.     

A low dose of ghrelin stimulates growth hormone (GH) release synergistically with GH-releasing hormone in humans

The synergistic relationship between GH-releasing secretagogue (GHS) and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) with respect to GH secretion is well known. In the present study, we report a similar relationship between GHRH and ghrelin, a recently identified endogenous ligand for the GHS receptor. In normal male adults, various doses of ghrelin were intravenously administered alone or together with 1.0 microg/kg GHRH. At small doses of 0.08 and 0.2 microg/kg ghrelin, combined administration of the two peptides significantly stimulated GH release in a synergistic manner; the mean GH response values of the two peptide combinations were more than the summed mean GH response values of each peptide alone (P < 0.05). In addition, at 1.0 microg/kg ghrelin, the tendency of the synergistic effect was observed, although the comparison was not statistically significant probably due to a submaximal dose ceiling effect. No synergistic effects with respect to ACTH or prolactin secretion were observed. In conclusion, the synergistic interaction between ghrelin and GHRH was clearly shown and might be useful for a provocation test to diagnose GH deficiency.     

Impaired growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone in thalassemia major

The response of GH to acute administration of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) was evaluated in 19 patients with thalassemia major and 8 normal children. In 13 of the 19 patients, GHRH induced a definite increase (greater than 5 ng/ml) in plasma GH levels, with peaks occurring 5-45 min postinjection. In 6 patients there was little or no GH rise after GHRH treatment. Overall, the mean GH response to GHRH of patients with thalassemia was lower than that of normal children. These data indicate that in thalassemia major, in addition to the described defect at the hepatic GH receptor or postreceptor level which impedes generation of somatomedins, there may be a marked impairment in somatotroph function. In one patient in whom the GH response to GHRH was superimposable on that of normal subjects, there was a blunted GH response to insulin hypoglycemia. This finding indicates that functional damage in hypothalamic structures for GH control can also occur in thalassemic patients.     

Half-time of endogenous growth hormone (GH) disappearance in normal man after stimulation of GH secretion by GH-releasing hormone and suppression with somatostatin

The half-life (t1/2) of disappearance of endogenous GH from serum was studied using physiological effectors to stimulate and then suppress GH release. GH secretion was stimulated by a single iv injection of GHRH, followed 45 min later by an iv bolus dose and then a 2.5-h infusion of somatostatin (SRIH) to suppress further release. The in vivo t1/2 of GH in seven men was calculated from serum GH concentrations measured at frequent intervals after beginning the SRIH infusion. The mean t1/2 of endogenous GH was 18.9 +/- 0.8 (+/- SE) min by monoexponential analysis and 3.5 +/- 0.7 and 20.7 +/- 0.7 min by biexponential fitting. In these normal men, the decline in GH concentrations after GHRH and SRIH administration was similar to that after the administration of GHRH alone, which yielded a t1/2 of 20.3 +/- 1.9 min. We conclude that the physiological kinetics of endogenous GH removal/disappearance can be estimated in vivo in man using GHRH with or without SRIH infusion.     

Exogenous 20K growth hormone (GH) suppresses endogenous 22K GH secretion in normal men

The physiological and pharmacological functions of the 20-kDa human GH (20K-hGH) isoform are unknown. We conducted a pharmacokinetic study of recombinant 20K-hGH in human subjects (Phase I clinical trial). Placebo or 20K-hGH was administered sc to normal men (20-31 yr of age, n = 6-8 per group) at 2100 h. Serum 20K- and 22K-hGH levels were monitored every 30 min for 24 h by specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Serum free fatty acid, insulin-like growth factor I, insulin, and glucose levels were measured for 24 h. In the placebo group, the secretion profiles of endogenous 20K- and 22K-hGH were pulsatile and similar to each other. The proportion of 20K- to 22K-hGH was fairly constant. In the 20K-hGH-treated groups, serum 20K-hGH levels increased in a dose-dependent manner over the dose range of 0.01-0.1 mg/kg. Maximum serum 20K-hGH levels were reached at 3-4 h and decreased with half-lives of 2-3 h. Marked suppression of endogenous 22K-hGH secretion was observed in a time-dependent manner. Serum free fatty acid and insulin-like growth factor I levels were significantly elevated (P < 0.01) at 4, 8, and 12 h and at 8, 12, and 24 h after 20K-hGH administration, respectively. Serum insulin and glucose levels did not change significantly within 24 h. These results suggested that: 1) regulation of 20K-hGH secretion is physiologically the same as that of 22K-hGH; 2) the pharmacokinetics after sc injection of 20K-hGH are comparable with those of 22K-hGH; 3) 20K-hGH regulates hGH secretion through "GH-induced negative feedback mechanisms"; and 4) administration of 20K-hGH is expected to exert GH actions (growth-promoting activity and lipolytic activity). Monitoring of serum 20K- and 22K-hGH levels may be useful in evaluating the effects of administered GH isoforms on their own release from the pituitary.     

Growth hormone (GH)-releasing peptide stimulates GH release in normal men and acts synergistically with GH-releasing hormone

The acute GH release stimulated by the synthetic hexapeptide, His-DTrp-Ala-Trp-DPhe-Lys-NH2 [GH releasing peptide (GHRP)], was determined in 18 normal men and compared with the effects of GH-releasing hormone, GHRH-(1-44)-NH2. Specificity of effect was assessed by measurement of serum PRL, LH, TSH, and cortisol. GHRP was administered at doses of 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 microgram/kg by iv bolus. GHRH at a dose of 1.0 microgram/kg was administered alone and together with various does of GHRP. No adverse clinical effects of laboratory abnormalities were observed in response to GHRP. A side-effect of mild facial flushing of 1- to 3-min duration occurred in 16 of the 18 subjects who received GHRH-(1-44)-NH2. Mean (+/- SEM) peak serum GH levels after injection of placebo and 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 microgram/kg GHRP were 1.2 +/- 0.3, 7.6 +/- 2.5, 16.5 +/- 4.1, and 68.7 +/- 15.5 micrograms/L, respectively. The submaximal dosages of 0.1 and 0.3 microgram/kg GHRP plus 1 microgram/kg GHRH stimulated GH release synergistically. Serum PRL and cortisol levels rose about 2-fold above basal levels only at the 1 microgram/kg dose of GHRP, and there were no changes in serum LH and TSH over the first hour after administration of the peptide(s). GHRP is a potent secretagogue of GH in normal men. Since GHRP and GHRH together stimulate GH release synergistically, these results suggest that GHRP and GHRH act independently. This supports our hypothesis that the GH-releasing activity of GHRP reflects a new physiological system in need of further characterization in animals and man.     

Suppression of the growth hormone (GH) response to clonidine and GH-releasing hormone by exogenous GH

GH release in response to clonidine and human GH-releasing hormone-(1-44) (hGHRH-44) was assessed in 11 boys (aged 7-14 yr) with short stature, who had normal GH secretion. The response to these 2 provocative stimuli was repeated after, respectively, 2 and 3 days of treatment with human GH (0.1 U/kg, im). Exogenous GH significantly blunted the response to both clonidine [the mean 2-h integrated serum GH concentration falling from 1050 +/- 350 (+/- SEM) to 749 +/- 297 ng/ml X min; P = 0.03] and hGHRH-44, the 2-h integrated GH concentration falling from 1553 +/- 358 to 547 +/- 202 ng/ml X min; (P = 0.03). Plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF-II) concentrations did not change after GH administration. In contrast, plasma IGF-I (somatomedin-C) concentrations increased from 97 +/- 16 ng/ml before administration of GH to 142 +/- 32 ng/ml (P = 0.05) after two days and 149 +/- 23 ng/ml (P less than 0.01) after the third treatment day. However, no correlation was found between the changes in response to clonidine or hGHRH-44 and changes in circulating levels of IGF-I. Our data confirm the existence of GH-dependent feedback inhibition of GH release during childhood and suggest that this inhibition operates, at least in part, at the level of the pituitary. While participation of the IGFs/somatomedins in this feedback loop cannot be excluded, the inhibitory effects of exogenous GH do not depend directly on circulating plasma IGF-I or IGF-II levels.     

Sexual dimorphism of growth hormone in the hypothalamus: regulation by estradiol

GH is best known as an anterior pituitary hormone fundamental in regulating growth, differentiation, and metabolism. GH peptide and mRNA are also present in brain, in which their functions are less well known. Here we describe the distribution of GH neurons and fibers and sex differences in Gh mRNA in adult mouse brain. Cell bodies exhibiting GH immunoreactivity are distributed in many brain regions, particularly in the hypothalamus in which retrograde labeling suggests that some of these cells project to the median eminence. To determine whether Gh mRNA is sexual dimorphic, we carried out quantitative RT-PCR on microdissected brain nuclei. Ovary-intact mice had elevated Gh mRNA in the arcuate nucleus and medial preoptic area (MPOA) compared with gonad-intact males. In males, castration increased Gh mRNA in the MPOA, whereas ovariectomy decreased Gh mRNA in both regions. When gonadectomized adults of both sexes were treated with estradiol Gh mRNA increased in females but had no effect in castrated males. Tamoxifen was able to blunt the rise in Gh mRNA in response to estradiol in females. In addition, we found that estrogen receptor-α is coexpressed in GH neurons in the MPOA and arcuate nucleus. In summary, the findings reveal sexual dimorphisms in Gh gene expression in areas of the brain associated with reproduction and behavior. Interestingly, estradiol enhances Gh mRNA in females only, suggesting that multiple factors orchestrate this sexual dimorphism.     

Growth hormone (GH) release after administration of GH-releasing hormone in relation to endogenous 24-h GH secretion in short children

Endogenous GH secretion was measured every 20 min for 24 h in 36 short children. This was immediately followed by an i.v. injection of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)(1-29)-NH2 (1 microgram/kg), and GH was estimated every 15 min for the following 2 h. The aim was to determine whether endogenous pulsatile GH secretion had any relation to, or influence on, the GH release induced by GHRH. A high variability was found both in the 24-h GH secretion expressed as area under the curve above the baseline (0-1588 mU/l x 24 h) and the maximal GH response to GHRH (5-296 mU/l), as well as after an arginine-insulin tolerance test (4-59 mU/l). We found a positive correlation (correlation coefficient of Spearman (rs) = 0.49; P less than 0.01) between the GH response to GHRH and the spontaneous GH secretion over a 24-h period, in spite of a negative correlation (rs = -0.80; P less than 0.01) with the GH secretion during the preceding 3 h. We conclude that the GH response to a GHRH test correlates with endogenous GH secretion in short children, and may be helpful in estimating the ability to release GH. It is important, however, to be aware of the influence of the spontaneous GH secretion during the 3 h immediately preceding administration of GHRH.     

Growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone in depression

To explore the GHRH-GH-somatomedin axis integrity in major depressive disorder, 11 drug-free patients and normal subjects matched for age, sex, ovarian status, and body weight received 1 microgram/kg synthetic human GHRH-44 amide as an iv bolus dose. Compared to the normal subjects, the depressed patients had reduced mean basal serum GH levels [2.2 +/- 0.5 (+/- SE) vs. 1.1 +/- 0.2 ng/mL (micrograms/L); P less than 0.05] and a significant attenuation of the net GH response to GHRH [1346 +/- 499 vs. 217 +/- 46 ng.min/mL (micrograms.min/L); P less than 0.01]. The blunted GH responses occurred in the face of significantly increased plasma somatomedin C (Sm-C) levels [1.1 +/- 0.2 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.1 U/mL; P less than 0.05]. The magnitude of GH responses to GHRH did not differ between men and women and was not significantly correlated with age, body weight, baseline serum GH levels, or plasma Sm-C levels in either individual groups or both groups combined. The increased plasma Sm-C levels in the depressed patients could have resulted from diurnal hypersecretion of GH, and the diminished GH responses to GHRH may reflect normal Sm-C-mediated feedback at the level of the pituitary. The presumed GH hypersecretion may be due to decreased hypothalamic somatostatin release and/or hyperactivity of GHRH-containing neurons. Thus, the pathological process resulting in abnormal GH secretory patterns associated with depression may occur primarily at a suprapituitary site.     

Selective lack of growth hormone (GH) response to the GH-releasing peptide hexarelin in patients with GH-releasing hormone receptor deficiency

The mechanism of the synergistic relationship between GH-releasing peptide (GHRP) and GHRH with respect to GH secretion is poorly understood. We report the response to hexarelin, a potent GHRP, in patients affected with a homozygous mutation in the GHRH receptor gene, with consequent GHRH resistance and GH-deficient dwarfism. This newly described syndrome is the human homolog of the little (lit/lit) mouse. Intravenous administration of hexarelin (2 microg/kg) to four male adult patients (dwarfs of Sindh) resulted in a complete lack of elevation in plasma GH levels (< 1 ng/mL), an at least 50- to 100-fold deviation from the normal response. In contrast, plasma PRL, ACTH, and cortisol levels rose in a normal manner in response to hexarelin. We conclude that an intact GHRH signaling system is critical for GHRPs to exert their effect on GH release, but that the GHRH system is not necessary for the effect of GHRP on PRL and ACTH secretion. Hexarelin (and probably other GHRPs) are not effective agents for the treatment of patients with GHRH resistance due to GHRH receptor deficiency.     

Sustained growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I responses to prolonged high-dose twice-daily GH-releasing hormone stimulation in middle-aged and older men

Postulated mechanisms underlying the relative hyposomato-tropism of aging include reduced hypothalamic drive by GHRH. To test this notion, we administered 1 mg (n = 11) vs. 4 mg (n = 11) recombinant human GHRH-1,44-amide s.c. twice daily for 3 months in a double-blind, parallel-cohort design to 22 healthy men (ages, 53-68 yr). After 3 months, GHRH elevated: overnight GH concentrations from 0.71 +/- 0.19 to 1.74 +/- 0.39 microg/liter (P < 0.001; 1 mg) and from 0.80 +/- 0.15 to 5.12 +/- 0.40 microg/liter (P < 0.001; 4 mg) and IGF-I concentrations from 117 +/- 14 to 234 +/- 20 microg/liter (P = 0.007; 1 mg) and from 147 +/- 13 to 286 +/- 22 microg/liter (P < 0.001; 4 mg). Only the higher GHRH dose also increased total body water (tritium space; P = 0.024) and fat-free mass (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; P = 0.021), and reduced total abdominal adiposity (computed axial tomography scan; P = 0.042). Both supplementation schedules shortened the time required to walk 30 m and ascend four flights of stairs (P < 0.025 each). Lower extremity strength, aerobic capacity, and bone mineral density did not change. Local injection site reactions were common.We conclude that sc administration of a large dose of GHRH (4 mg) twice daily for 3 months elevates GH and IGF-I concentrations, increases total body water and fat-free mass, reduces total abdominal adiposity, and enhances certain performance measures in healthy aging men but causes local skin reactions.     

Gonadal status and body mass index jointly determine growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone/GH-releasing peptide synergy in healthy men

CONTEXT: Sex steroid hormones potentiate whereas increased body mass index (BMI) represses GH secretion. Whether sex steroids modify the negative effect of BMI on secretagogue-induced GH secretion in men is not known. The issue is important in designing GH-stimulation regimens that are relatively insensitive to both gonadal status and adiposity. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare the relationships between BMI and peptide-stimulated GH secretion in men with normal and reduced testosterone and estradiol availability. SETTING: The study was performed at an academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Healthy young men were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Randomized separate-day iv infusion of saline and/or maximally effective doses of L-arginine/GHRH, L-arginine/GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-2, and GHRH/GHRP-2 in eugonadal (n=12) and experimentally hypogonadal (n=10) men was performed. OUTCOMES: Regression of paired secretagogue-induced GH responses on BMI was determined. RESULTS: In eugonadal men, peak GH concentrations correlated negatively with BMI. In particular, BMI accounted for only 38% of the response variability after L-arginine/GHRH (P=0.0165), but 62% after GHRH/GHRP-2 (P=0.0012) and 65% after L-arginine/GHRP-2 (P=0.00075). In contrast, in hypogonadal men, GH responses were uncorrelated with BMI. The negative effects of BMI on peak GH responses in eugonadal and hypogonadal states differed most markedly after stimulation with GHRH/GHRP-2 (P=0.0019). This contrast was corroborated using integrated GH responses (P=0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term experimental gonadal sex hormone depletion attenuates dual secretagogue-stimulated GH secretion in lean young men. The inhibitory effect of relative adiposity on GH secretion appears to predominate over that of acute sex steroid withdrawal.