Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing–generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data

Background.Little is known about the accuracy of physical dental casts that are based on three-dimensional (3D) data from an intraoral scanner (IOS). Thus, the authors conducted a study to evaluate the accuracy of full-arch stereolithographic (SLA) and milled casts obtained from scans of three IOSs.Methods.The authors digitized a polyurethane model using a laboratory reference scanner and three IOSs. They sent the scans (n = five scans per IOS) to the manufacturers to produce five physical dental casts and scanned the casts with the reference scanner. Using 3D evaluation software, the authors superimposed the data sets and compared them.Results.The mean trueness values of Lava Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S. (3M ESPE, St. Paul, Minn.), CEREC AC with Bluecam (Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) and iTero (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif.) casts were 67.50 micrometers (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 63.43-71.56), 75.80 μm (95 percent CI, 71.74-79.87) and 98.23 μm (95 percent CI, 94.17-102.30), respectively, with a statistically significant difference among all of the scanners (P < .05). The mean precision values were 13.77 μm (95 percent CI, 2.76-24.79), 21.62 μm (95 percent CI, 10.60-32.63) and 48.83 μm (95 percent CI, 37.82-59.85), respectively, with statistically significant differences between CEREC AC with Bluecam and iTero casts, as well as between Lava Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S. and iTero casts (P < .05).Conclusion.All of the casts showed an acceptable level of accuracy; however, the SLA-based casts (CEREC AC with Bluecam and Lava Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S.) seemed to be more accurate than milled casts (iTero).Practical Implications.On the basis of the results of this investigation, the authors suggested that SLA technology was superior for the fabrication of dental casts. Nevertheless, all of the investigated casts showed clinically acceptable accuracy. Clinicians should keep in mind that the highest deviations might occur in the distal areas of the casts.     

The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: An in vitro comparative study

BackgroundAlthough intraoral scanners are known to have good accuracy in computer-aided impression making (CAIM), their effect on time efficiency is not. Little is known about the time required to make a digital impression. The purpose of the authors’ in vitro investigation was to evaluate the time efficiency of intraoral scanners.MethodsThe authors used three different intraoral scanners to digitize a single abutment (scenario 1), a short-span fixed dental prosthesis (scenario 2) and a full-arch prosthesis preparation (scenario 3). They measured the procedure durations for the several scenarios and compiled and contrasted the procedure durations for three conventional impression materials.ResultsThe mean total procedure durations for making digital impressions of scenarios 1, 2 and 3 were as much as 5 minutes 57 seconds, 6 minutes 57 seconds, and 20 minutes 55 seconds, respectively. Results showed statistically significant differences between all scanners (P < .05), except Lava (3M ESPE, St. Paul, Minn.) and iTero with foot pedal (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif.) for scenario 1, CEREC (Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) and CEREC with foot pedal for scenario 2, and iTero and iTero with foot pedal for scenarios 2 and 3. The compiled procedure durations for making conventional impressions in scenarios 1 and 2 ranged between 18 minutes 15 seconds and 27 minutes 25 seconds; for scenario 3, they ranged between 21 minutes 25 seconds and 30 minutes 25 seconds.ConclusionsThe authors found that CAIM was significantly faster for all tested scenarios. This suggests that CAIM might be beneficial in establishing a more time-efficient work flow.Practical ImplicationsOn the basis of the results of this in vitro study, the authors found CAIM to be superior regarding time efficiency in comparison with conventional approaches and might accelerate the work flow of making impressions.     

The role of dentin moisture in the degradation of resin-dentin interfaces under clinical and laboratory conditions

BackgroundThe authors conducted a study to evaluate the influence of dentin moisture on the degradation of the resin-dentin interface in primary teeth under clinical and laboratory conditions.MethodsThe authors prepared 40 Class I restorations (five teeth per group) by using a cylindrical diamond bur, leaving a flat dentin surface on the pulpal floor. They vigorously rubbed two coats of a simplified etch-and-rinse adhesive on either dry or wet demineralized dentin under clinical or laboratory conditions. After performing restorative procedures, the authors extracted teeth prepared under clinical conditions after 20 minutes (immediately) or the teeth exfoliated after six months. The authors also tested the teeth prepared under laboratory conditions immediately or after six months of being stored in water. They sectioned the teeth to obtain resin-dentin bonded specimens for microtensile testing and for silver nitrate uptake (SNU) under scanning electron microscopy. They performed a three-way analysis of variance and Tukey test (α = .05) on the SNU bond strength data.ResultsStatistically higher bond strength values (megapascals [standard deviation]) were observed when bonding was performed under laboratory conditions (clinical = 25.2 [3.6] MPa versus laboratory = 28.5 [4.4] MPa; P < .05). Degradation occurred only in the wet dentin groups under both experimental conditions (immediately = 31.3 [4.5] MPa versus after six months = 21.3 [2.1] MPa; P < .05). SNU occurred in all groups and was statistically higher after six months of clinical function or water storage (immediately = 13.9 [4.9 SD] percent versus after six months = 34.1 [4.5 SD] percent; P < .05).ConclusionsThe bonding of adhesives to dry demineralized dentin produces adhesive interfaces that are more resistant to degradation regardless of the bonding condition.Clinical ImplicationsResin-dentin bond strengths produced under laboratory conditions in primary teeth may be higher than those obtained under clinical circumstances, although both conditions (clinical and laboratory) seemed to yield similar results. Bonding to dry demineralized primary tooth dentin produced resin-dentin interfaces that were more resistant to degradation.     

An assessment of the usefulness of jaw kinesiography in monitoring temporomandibular disorders: Correlation of treatment-related kinesiographic and pain changes in patients receiving temporomandibular joint injections

BackgroundThe authors conducted a study in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis to assess whether treatment-related changes in pain levels and chewing ability coincide with a change in jaw kinesiographic (KG) parameters.MethodsThe authors selected 34 patients with a diagnosis of TMJ osteoarthritis that met Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) to undergo a cycle of five weekly arthrocentesis procedures with injections of 1 milliliter hyaluronic acid. They performed a permutation test to assess the correlation between changes across time (from baseline to end of treatment) in two clinical outcome parameters—pain level and chewing ability—and changes across time in the KG outcome parameters.ResultsThe authors observed improvement across time in both chewing ability (F = 8.328; P = .005) and pain level (F = 10.903; P = .002). The authors observed no significant changes in any KG variables. With minor exceptions, no significant correlations were shown between changes in the clinical and KG parameters during the treatment period.ConclusionsTreatment-related changes in pain levels and chewing ability in patients with TMJ osteoarthritis do not coincide with changes in KG parameters.Practical ImplicationsIf one assumes pain variables to be the primary outcome measures in assessing treatment of TMJ osteoarthritis, KG recordings of the jaw are not useful for monitoring TMJ osteoarthritis in the clinical setting.     

The inferior alveolar nerve's loop at the mental foramen and its implications for surgery

BackgroundIn this study, the authors aimed to identify and measure the anterior extension of the alveolar loop (aAL) and the caudal extension of the alveolar loop (cAL) of the inferior alveolar nerve by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). They also aimed to provide recommendations for surgery in the anterior mandible.MethodsIn this retrospective case study of the frequency and extension of aAL and cAL, the authors evaluated 1,384 mandibular sites in 694 CBCT scans of dentate and partly edentulous patients, performed mainly for further diagnosis before removal of the mandibular third molars between January 2009 and February 2013, by using multiplanar reconstructions.ResultsThe frequency of aAL was 69.73 percent and of cAL was 100 percent. The mean value for aAL was 1.16 millimeters, with a range of 0.3 to 5.6 mm; the mean value for cAL was 4.11 mm, with a range of 0.25 to 8.87 mm. For aAL, 95.81 percent of the sites showed values of 0 to 3 mm; for cAL, 93.78 percent of the sites showed values of 0.25 to 6 mm. Dentate patients showed statistically significantly higher values for cAL than did partly edentulous patients (P = .043). CBCT resolution had a statistically significant impact on cAL measurements (P = .001), with higher values at higher resolution.ConclusionsThis study showed a high frequency of and large variations in aAL and cAL. In contrast to panoramic radiography, CBCT has been shown to be a reliable tool for identifying and measuring the AL. Therefore, preoperative diagnosis with CBCT is recommended for planning three-dimensional tasks such as implant placement in the vicinity of the mental foramen.Practical ImplicationsOwing to the variability of aAL and cAL measurements, it is difficult to recommend reliable safety margins for surgical procedures such as implant placement, bone harvesting or genioplasty. Depending on the indication, the clinician should consider preoperative diagnosis by means of CBCT.     

An evaluation of 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels in patients with acute toothaches: Efficacy,tolerability and compliance with label dose administration directions

BackgroundThe authors evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels compared with those of a vehicle (placebo) gel for the temporary relief of toothache pain. They also assessed the compliance with the label dose administration directions on the part of participants with toothache pain.MethodsUnder double-masked conditions, 576 participants self-applied study gel to an open tooth cavity and surrounding oral tissues. Participants evaluated their pain intensity and pain relief for 120 minutes. The authors determined the amount of gel the participants applied.ResultsThe responders’ rates (the primary efficacy parameter), defined as the percentage of participants who had an improvement in pain intensity as exhibited by a pain score reduction of at least one unit on the dental pain scale from baseline for two consecutive assessments any time between the five- and 20-minute points, were 87.3 percent, 80.7 percent and 70.4 percent, respectively, for 20 percent benzocaine gel, 10 percent benzocaine gel and vehicle gel. Both benzocaine gels were significantly (P ≤ .05) better than vehicle gel; the 20 percent benzocaine gel also was significantly (P ≤ .05) better than the 10 percent benzocaine gel. The mean amount of gel applied was 235.6 milligrams, with 88.2 percent of participants applying 400 mg or less.ConclusionsBoth 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels were more efficacious than the vehicle gel, and the 20 percent benzocaine gel was more efficacious than the 10 percent benzocaine gel. All treatments were well tolerated by participants.Practical ImplicationsPatients can use 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels to temporarily treat toothache pain safely.     

Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review

PurposeThe digitization of the dental field has been vigorously promoted in recent years. An impression using an intraoral scanner is considered to significantly change future dental treatment. The purpose of this review is to evaluate accuracy and practicality of various intraoral scanners and verification method of intraoral scanners.Study selectionThis review was based on articles searched through the MEDLINE and PubMed databases. The main keywords that were employed during the search were “Oral Scanner, Intraoral Scanners, Desktop Scanner, and Digital Impression”.ResultIt was reported that illuminance and color temperature affected trueness and precision of intraoral scanners. The repeatability of intraoral scanners indicated the possibility of producing fixed prostheses within the range of being partially edentulous. It is considered difficult to use intraoral scanners in fabricating cross-arch fixed prostheses. However, with intraoral scanners, it may be considered possible to fabricate mouth guards and dentures equivalent to those of desktop scanners. Current intraoral scanner scans are considered more comfortable than traditional impressions that use irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impression materials.ConclusionSince the intraoral scanner is an evolving device, further improvement in accuracy is expected in the future. In addition, verification of the accuracy of intraoral scanners must be conducted accordingly.     

Implications of medical screenings of patients arriving for dental treatment: The results of a comprehensive laboratory screening

BackgroundThe authors conducted medical laboratory screenings in a dental setting to determine the relationships between the laboratory test results and self-reported medical health findings.MethodsThe authors collected serum, urine and medical histories from 171 patients (116 [68 percent] women; mean age, 43.4 years) who arrived for dental treatment as a component of a clinical trial and performed complete blood cell counts, standard blood chemistry panels and urinalysis on the samples.ResultsThe authors found 414 abnormal laboratory test results (an average of 2.42 per patient). Eighty-three percent of participants had one or more abnormal test results, 83 percent had abnormal test results and did not indicate a relevant disease in their medical history, and 18 percent had laboratory test results outside the 99 percent reference range (that is, > three standard deviations from the mean). Abnormal test results were significantly associated with sex, age, race and medical history (P < .05). Abnormal test results associated with kidney disease were related to patients with cardiovascular disease and diabetes, as well as those who tended to be on average older than 50 years.ConclusionsThe high frequency of significant abnormal laboratory test results detected in this study suggests that many patients may be unaware of their medical statuses.Practical ImplicationsAbnormal laboratory test results are detected frequently in the serum and urine of patients arriving for dental treatment, which could indicate undiagnosed disease and less than optimal medical management.     

Minimally invasive resin infiltration of arrested white-spot lesions: A randomized clinical trial

BackgroundThe authors conducted a randomized, single-masked clinical trial involving patients who had completed orthodontic treatment to assess changes in the appearance of white-spot lesions (WSLs) that were treated with resin infiltration.MethodsThe authors divided affected teeth into control and treatment groups. In the treatment group, they restored teeth with WSLs by using resin infiltration. They evaluated changes in WSLs photographically by using a visual analog scale (VAS) (0 = no change, 100 = complete disappearance) and area measurements (in square millimeters). The authors analyzed the data by using two-way analysis of variance.ResultsThe mean VAS ratings for treated teeth demonstrated marked improvement relative to that for control teeth immediately after treatment (67.7 versus 5.2, P < .001) and eight weeks later (65.9 versus 9.2, P < .001). The results for treated teeth showed a mean reduction in WSL area of 61.8 percent immediately after treatment and 60.9 percent eight weeks later, compared with a ?3.3 percent change for control teeth immediately after treatment and a 1.0 percent reduction eight weeks later.ConclusionsResin infiltration significantly improved the clinical appearance of WSLs, with stable results seen eight weeks after treatment.Practical ImplicationsResin infiltration, a minimally invasive restorative treatment, was shown to be effective for WSLs that formed during orthodontic treatment.     

Restoration of noncarious tooth defects by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network

BackgroundThe authors conducted a study to quantify the reasons for restoring noncarious tooth defects (NCTDs) by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) and to assess the tooth, patient and dentist characteristics associated with those reasons.MethodsData were collected by 178 DPBRN dentists regarding the placement of 1,301 consecutive restorations owing to NCTDs. Information gathered included the main clinical reason, other than dental caries, for restoration of previously unrestored permanent tooth surfaces; characteristics of patients who received treatment; dentists’ and dental practices’ characteristics; teeth and surfaces restored; and restorative materials used.ResultsDentists most often placed restorations to treat lesions caused by abrasion, abfraction or erosion (AAE) (46 percent) and tooth fracture (31 percent). Patients 41 years or older received restorations mainly because of AAE (P < .001). Premolars and anterior teeth were restored mostly owing to AAE; molars were restored mostly owing to tooth fracture (P < .001). Dentists used directly placed resin-based composite (RBC) largely to restore AAE lesions and fractured teeth (P < .001).ConclusionsAmong DPBRN practices, AAE and tooth fracture were the main reasons for restoring noncarious tooth surfaces. Pre-molars and anterior teeth of patients 41 years and older are most likely to receive restorations owing to AAE; molars are most likely to receive restorations owing to tooth fracture. Dentists restored both types of NCTDs most often with RBC.     

How willing are dentists to treat young children?: A survey of dentists affiliated with Medicaid managed care in New York City, 2010

BackgroundDespite recommendations for children to have a dental visit by the age of 1 year, access to dental care for young children, including children enrolled in Medicaid, remains limited. The authors conducted a survey to assess the availability of dentists to see young children enrolled in Medicaid managed care (MMC) in New York City (NYC), to determine barriers to the provision of dental care to young children and, within the context of MMC, to identify strategies to facilitate the delivery of dental care to children.MethodsThe authors mailed a survey to assess the provision of dental services to young children and perceived barriers and facilitators to 2,311 general dentists (GDs) and 140 pediatric dentists (PDs) affiliated with NYC MMC. A total of 1,127 surveys (46 percent) were received. The authors analyzed the responses according to provider type, youngest aged child seen, provider’s ability to see additional children and practice location. The authors compared responses by using the χ² test.ResultsFewer than one-half (47 percent) of GDs saw children aged 0 through 2 years. Provider type, years in practice and percentage of Medicaid-insured patients were associated significantly (P χ .005) with youngest age of child seen. Among respondents seeing children aged 0 through 2 years, PDs were significantly more likely to provide preventive therapy (P = .004) and restorative treatment (P χ .001). Additional training and access to consulting PDs were identified by GDs as potential facilitators to seeing young children.ConclusionA high proportion of NYC GDs affiliated with MMC do not see young children.Practice ImplicationsNinety-four percent of NYC MMC– affiliated dentists are GDs, but 53 percent of GD respondents did not see children aged 0 through 2 years in their practices. Improving access to dental care for young children requires changes in GDs’ practices, possibly by means of additional training and access to consulting PDs.     

Effect of different arch widths on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners

PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of three intraoral scanner (IOS) systems with three different dental arch widths.MATERIALS AND METHODSThree dental models with different intermolar widths (small, medium, and large) were attached to metal bars of different lengths (30, 40, and 50 mm). The bars were measured with a coordinate measuring machine and used as references. Three IOSs were compared: TRIOS 3 (TRI), True Definition (TD), and Dental Wings (DW). The relative length and angular deviation of both ends of the metal bars from the scan data set (n = 15) were calculated and analyzed.RESULTSComparing among scanners in terms of trueness, the relative length deviation of DW in the small (1.28%) and medium (1.08%) arches were significantly higher than TRI (0.46% and 0.48%) and TD (0.33% and 0.18%). The angular deviation of DW in the small (1.75°) and medium (1.83°) arches were also significantly greater than TRI (0.63° and 0.40°) and TD (0.55° and 0.89°). Comparing within scanner, the large arch of DW showed better accuracy than other arch sizes (P < .05). On the other hand, the larger arch of TD presented a greater tendency of angular deviation in terms of trueness. No significant differences were found in terms of trueness between the arch widths of TRI group.CONCLUSIONThe different widths of the dental arches can affect the accuracy of some intraoral scanners in full arch scan.     

Early childhood caries screening tools: a comparison of four approaches

BackgroundEarly childhood caries (ECC) is prevalent and consequential. Risk assessment tools have been proposed that can be used to identify children who require intensive interventions. In this study, the authors compare four approaches for identifying children needing early and intensive intervention to prevent or minimize caries experience for their accuracy and clinical usefulness.MethodsThe authors screened 229 predominantly low-income Hispanic children younger than 3 years with ECC and 242 without ECC by using the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry's Caries-risk Assessment Tool (CAT) and the optional screening measure of culturing Streptococcus mutans. The authors compared four approaches (CAT, CAT minus socioeconomic status, CAT minus socioeconomic status plus mutans streptococci [MS] and MS alone) for accuracy and clinical usefulness.ResultsThe results of the CAT demonstrated high sensitivity (100.0 percent) and negative predictive value (NPV) (100.0 percent) but low specificity (2.9 percent) and positive predictive value (PPV) (49.4 percent). The MS culture alone had the highest combination of accuracy and clinical usefulness (sensitivity, 86.5 percent; specificity, 93.4 percent; PPV, 92.5 percent; NPV, 87.9 percent). When we removed the socioeconomic status element, the CAT's performance improved.ConclusionsSalivary culture of MS alone in a population of young, low-income Hispanic childrenoutperformed the CAT and variations on the CAT for test accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) and clinical usefulness (predictive values).Clinical ImplicationsScreening for ECC by using salivary MS cultures and variations on the CAT are promising approaches for identifying children who need early and intensive intervention to prevent or minimize caries experience.     

Treatments for hypersensitive noncarious cervical lesions: A Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network randomized clinical effectiveness study

BackgroundThe Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network conducted a three-armed randomized clinical study to determine the comparative effectiveness of three treatments for hypersensitive noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs): use of a potassium nitrate dentifrice for treatment of hypersensitivity, placement of a resin-based composite restoration and placement of a sealant.MethodsSeventeen trained practitioner-investigators (P-Is) in the PEARL Network enrolled participants (N = 304) with hypersensitive posterior NCCLs who met enrollment criteria. Participants were assigned to treatments randomly. Evaluations were conducted at baseline and at one, three and six months thereafter. Primary outcomes were the reduction or elimination of hypersensitivity as measured clinically and by means of patient-reported outcomes.ResultsLesion depth and pretreatment sensitivity (mean, 5.3 on a 0- to 10-point scale) were balanced across treatments, as was sleep bruxism (present in 42.2 percent of participants). The six-month participant recall rate was 99 percent. Treatments significantly reduced mean sensitivity (P < .01), with the sealant and restoration groups displaying a significantly higher reduction (P < .01) than did the dentifrice group. The dentifrice group’s mean (standard deviation) sensitivity at six months was 2.1 (2.1); those of the sealant and restoration groups were 1.0 (1.6) and 0.8 (1.4), respectively. Patient-reported sensitivity (to cold being most pronounced) paralleled clinical measurements at each evaluation.ConclusionsSealing and restoration treatments were effective overall in reducing NCCL hypersensitivity. The potassium nitrate dentifrice reduced sensitivity with increasing effectiveness through six months but not to the degree offered by the other treatments.Practical ImplicationsSealant or restoration placement is an effective method of immediately reducing NCCL sensitivity. Although a potassium nitrate dentifrice did reduce sensitivity slowly across six months, at no time was the reduction commensurate with that of sealants or restorations.     

Accuracy of 14 intraoral scanners for the All-on-4 treatment concept: a comparative in vitro study

PURPOSEThis in vitro study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of 14 different intraoral scanners for the All-on-4 treatment concept.MATERIALS AND METHODSFour implants were placed in regions 13, 16, 23, and 26 of an edentulous maxillary model that was poured with scannable Type 4 gypsum to imitate the All-on-4 concept. The cast was scanned 10 times for each of 14 intraoral scanners (Primescan, iTero 2, iTero 5D, Virtuo Vivo, Trios 3, Trios 4, CS3600, CS3700, Emerald, Emerald S, Medit i500, BenQ BIS-I, Heron IOS, and Aadva IOS 100P) after the polyether ether ketone scanbody was placed. For the control group, the gypsum model was scanned 10 times with an industrial scanner. The first of the 10 virtual models obtained from the industrial model was chosen as the reference model. For trueness, the data of the 14 dental scanners were superimposed with the reference model; for precision, the data of all 14 scanners were superimposed within the groups. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Shapiro-Wilks, and Dunn’s tests.RESULTSPrimescan showed the highest trueness and precision values (P < .005), followed by the iTero 5D scanner (P < .005).CONCLUSIONSome of these digital scanners can be used to make impressions within the All-on-4 concept. However, the possibility of data loss due to artifacts, reflections, and the inability to combine the data should be considered.     

Restorative outcomes for endodontically treated teeth in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning network

BackgroundThe authors aimed to determine the outcome of and factors associated with success and failure of restorations in endodontically treated teeth in patients in practices participating in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network.MethodsPractitioner-investigators (P-Is) invited the enrollment of all patients seeking care at participating practices who had undergone primary endodontic therapy and restoration in a permanent tooth three to five years earlier. P-Is classified endodontically reated teeth as restorative failures if the restoration was replaced, the restoration needed replacement or the tooth was cracked or fractured.ResultsP-Is from 64 practices enrolled in the study 1,298 eligible patients who had endodontically treated teeth that had been restored. The mean (standard deviation) time to follow-up was 3.9 (0.6) years. Of the 1,298 enrolled teeth, P-Is classified 181 (13.9 percent; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 12.1–15.8 percent) as restorative failures: 44 (3.4 percent) due to cracks or fractures, 57 (4.4 percent) due to replacement of the original restoration for reasons other than fracture and 80 (6.2 percent) due to need for a new restoration. When analyzing the results by means of multivariate logistic regression, the authors found a greater risk of restorative failure to be associated with canines or incisors and premolars (P = .04), intracoronal restorations (P < .01), lack of preoperative proximal contacts (P < .01), presence of periodontal connective-tissue attachment loss (P < .01), younger age (P = .01), Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (P = .04) and endodontic therapy not having been performed by a specialist (P = .04).ConclusionsThese results suggest that molars (as opposed to other types of teeth), full-coverage restorations, preoperative proximal contacts, good periodontal health, non-Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, endodontic therapy performed by a specialist and older patient age are associated with restorative success for endodontically treated teeth in general practice.Clinical ImplicationsThese results contribute to the clinical evidence base to help guide practitioners when planning the restoration of endodontically treated teeth.     

Reimbursement rates and policies for primary molar pit-and-fissure sealants across state Medicaid programs

BackgroundLittle is known about Medicaid policies regarding reimbursement for placement of sealants on primary molars. The authors identified Medicaid programs that reimbursed dentists for placing primary molar sealants and hypothesized that these programs had higher reimbursement rates than did state programs that did not reimburse for primary molar sealants.MethodsThe authors obtained Medicaid reimbursement data from online fee schedules and determined whether each state Medicaid program reimbursed for primary molar sealants (no or yes). The outcome measure was the reimbursement rate for permanent tooth sealants (calculated in 2012 U.S. dollars). The authors compared mean reimbursement rates by using the t test (α = .05).ResultsSeventeen Medicaid programs reimbursed dentists for placing primary molar sealants (34 percent), and the mean reimbursement rate was $27.57 (range, $16.00 [Maine] to $49.68 [Alaska]). All 50 programs reimbursed dentists for placement of sealants on permanent teeth. The mean reimbursement for permanent tooth sealants was significantly higher in programs that reimbursed for primary molar sealants than in programs that did not ($28.51 and $23.67, respectively; P = .03).ConclusionsMost state Medicaid programs do not reimburse dentists for placing sealants on primary molars, but programs that do so have significantly higher reimbursement rates.Practical ImplicationsMedicaid reimbursement rates are related to dentists' participation in Medicaid and children's dental care use. Reimbursement for placement of sealants on primary molars is a proxy for Medicaid program generosity.     

Bisphosphonate use and the risk of adverse jaw outcomes: a medical claims study of 714,217 people

BACKGROUND: While osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) has been associated with the prolonged use of bisphosphonates (BPs), there is limited information about the risk of ONJ among users of oral BPs or about the magnitude of the risk among users of intravenous (IV) BPs. METHODS: The authors studied medical claims data from 714,217 people with osteoporosis or cancer to identify diagnostic codes or procedure codes for three outcomes: inflammatory conditions of the jaws, including osteonecrosis; major jaw surgery necessitated by necrotic or inflammatory indications; and jaw surgeries necessitated by a malignant process. The authors calculated stratified odds ratios and 95 percent confidence intervals. RESULTS: The results indicate that oral administration of BPs decreases the risk of adverse bone outcomes. In contrast, IV administration strongly and significantly increases the risk (P < .05) of adverse jaw outcomes or surgery. Across both osteoporosis and cancer, patients receiving IV BPs had a fourfold increased risk of having inflammatory jaw conditions and a greater than sixfold increased risk of having undergone major surgical resection in the jaw. CONCLUSIONS: Mode of bisphosphonate use results in different risk profiles for adverse jaw outcomes. While the authors documented an increased risk of inflammatory conditions and surgical procedures of the jaw for users of IV BPs, they did not find these observed increases for users of oral BPs. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Physicians and dentists must be aware of the higher frequency of adverse jaw effects in patients receiving IV BPs, especially osteonecrosis of the jaw. While the authors' results have internal consistency, more clinical studies are needed to replicate and clarify the observed associations over long follow-up periods.     

Updated recommendations for managing the care of patients receiving oral bisphosphonate therapy: An advisory statement from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs

Background and OverviewIn 2005, the American Dental Association (ADA) Council on Scientific Affairs convened an expert panel to develop clinical recommendations for dentists treating patients who are receiving oral bisphosphonate therapy. The Journal of the American Dental Association published the resulting report in 2006. This 2008 advisory statement is the first of projected periodic updates of the 2006 clinical recommendations.ConclusionThis 2008 advisory statement concludes, on the basis of a review of the current literature, that for patients receiving bisphosphonate therapy, the risk of developing bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis (BON) of the jaw apparently remains low. It also newly concludes that current screening and diagnostic tests are unreliable for predicting a patient's risk of developing the condition. This statement updates the 2006 recommendations regarding general dentistry, management of periodontal diseases, implant placement and maintenance, oral and maxillofacial surgery, endodontics, restorative dentistry and prosthodontics, and orthodontics.