Combination therapy with methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a prospective randomized clinical trial of order of administration

Because of biochemical and tissue culture evidence casting doubt on the physiologic relevance of reported synergy afforded by sequential administration of methotrexate (MTX) followed by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), a randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in 108 patients with advanced cancer, including 70 with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck, nine with SCC of other primary sites, 24 with colorectal, and five with gastric adenocarcinomas. Patients were randomized to receive weekly therapy consisting of MTX followed one hour later by 5-FU, or 5-FU followed one hour later by MTX. There was a trend to higher tumor response rates in patients treated with MTX before 5-FU (45% v 33% overall; 65% v 39% in patients with previously untreated head and neck cancer), but these differences were not significant, either by chi-square test or by multivariate stepwise logistic regression. The trend in survival favoring the reverse sequence of 5-FU before MTX was not significant in univariate analyses. Stepwise multivariate Cox model analysis showed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status at study entry was the major prognostic factor for survival (P less than 0.001), but among the 70 patients with head and neck cancer, the sequence of drug administration was the only other significant prognostic factor for survival, and favored the sequence of 5-FU followed by MTX (P less than 0.025).     

Sequential methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and calcium leucovorin in colorectal carcinoma

Forty-four patients with locally recurrent or metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were treated with methotrexate (MTX) 100 mg/m2 i.v. followed 1 h later by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 600 mg/m2 i.v. Calcium leucovorin 10 mg/m2 p.o. q 6 h X four doses was given 24 h after MTX. The regimen was given on days 1 and 8 and repeated every 28 days. Six of 44 patients (14%) obtained either complete or partial response with a mean response duration of 6.8 months. Of 26 previously untreated patients there were one complete response (4%), four partial responses (15%), and 12 (46%) instances of stabilization of disease. Patients obtaining response or stabilization of disease experienced improved survival compared to those with progressive disease. Toxicity consisted of stomatitis and hematopoietic suppression requiring dose attenuation in six patients (14%); there were no treatment-related deaths. Sequenced MTX/5-FU is modestly active with acceptable toxicity in previously untreated patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma but offers no apparent advantage over single-agent 5-FU.     

Double-modulation of 5-Fluorouracil by methotrexate and leucovorin in advanced colorectal-carcinoma

A phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a double modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by methotrexate (MTX) and leucovorin (LV) as first line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal carcinoma. Between January 1990, and April 1992, 42 patients with metastatic or advanced recurrent (inoperable) colorectal cancer were entered into the study. Therapy consisted of a sequential combination of MTX, LV and 5-FU. MTX was administered at a dose of 150 mg/m2 over 20 minutes I.V. infusion at hour (h) 0, followed 19 h later by LV 50 mg/m2 over 2 h infusion. 5-FU 900 mg/m2 was given by I.V. push injection at h 20. Starting 24 h after MTX administration all patients received LV 15 mg/m2 intramuscularly every 6 h for six doses. Treatment was repeated every 15 days until progressive disease, severe toxicity, or death. Four patients were considered not evaluable for response. Objective regression (OR) was observed in 14 of 38 patients (37%, 95% confidence interval 23-53%). Two patients (5%) obtained complete response (CR) and 12 (32%) partial response (PR). Median time to treatment failure was 6 months (range 1-21). Median survival for the whole group of patients was 13 months (range 1-27). Toxicity was within acceptable limits but one therapy-related death due to severe leukopenia and sepsis was observed. Double modulation of 5-FU with MTX and low dose of LV is an active regimen against advanced colorectal carcinoma and represents a promising strategy that should be further explored.     

Therapeutic effect of sequential doses of methotrexate (MTX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced gastric cancer: comparison of intermediate-dose MTX with high-dose MTX

Twenty-one patients were treated with sequential doses of MTX and 5-FU so as to be classified by MTX dosage into an intermediate MTX-dose group and a high MTX-dose group. In the intermediate-dose MTX group, the drug was given at a dosage of 100 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) and followed 1 hour later by 5-FU at 800 mg/m2 i.v. (dripping for 1 hour); the drugs were recycled every 1 week. In the high-dose MTX group, the drug was administered at a dose of 1.5 g/m2 i.v. (dripping for 2 hours) and followed 1 hour later by 5-FU at 1.5 g/m2 i.v. (dripping for 2 hours); the drugs were recycled every 2-3 weeks. Average MTX concentrations in serum at the start of 5-FU administration were 1.69 X 10(-5) and 1.33 X 10(-4) mol/l/h in the intermediate and high-dose MTX groups, respectively. Six (50%) of 12 patients adequately treated with intermediate-dose MTX had a partial response (PR), and one (14.3%) of 7 evaluable patients treated with high-dose MTX had a PR. Major toxicity included diarrhea (33.3%) in the intermediate-dose MTX group and hair loss (71.4%) in the high-dose MTX group. Hematological toxicity was mild in MTX group: six (50%) of 12 patients had a granulocyte count nadir less than 1,000/microliters and one (8.3%) of 12 patients had a platelet count nadir less than 10(5)/microliters in the intermediate-dose MTX group. Five (71.4%) of 7 patients had a granulocyte nadir less than 1,000/microliters and two (28.6%) of 7 patients had a platelet count nadir less than 10(5)/microliters in the high-dose MTX group.     

Advanced colorectal carcinoma. A prospective randomized trial of sequential methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil alone

One hundred and twenty-five previously untreated patients bearing metastatic or advanced recurrent (inoperable) colorectal carcinoma and measurable disease were prospectively randomized. Those in arm A received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 1,200 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 2 h, while those in arm B received methotrexate (MTX), 200 mg/m2 i.v. (push injection), followed 20 h later by 5-FU, 1,200 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 2 h, plus calcium leucovorin (LV), 25 mg i.m. every 6 h for eight doses beginning 24 h after MTX administration. Cycles were repeated every 15 days. All patients receiving treatment were evaluable for toxicity and survival, and 118 patients were evaluable for response. The objective regression rate (complete plus partial response) was 12% (7 of 58) in arm A and 28% (17 of 60) in arm B (p = 0.049). No change was observed in 24% (14 of 58) in arm A and in 35% (21 of 60) in arm B (p = 0.28), while progressive disease was registered in 64% (37 of 58) and 37% (22 of 60) in arms A and B, respectively (p = 0.006). Median duration of response was 3 months in arm A and 5 months in arm B (p = 0.39). The median survival was 8.3 months in arm A and 11.2 months in arm B (p = 0.25). No statistically significant differences were found when objective regression and survival were related to site of primary tumor, performance status, and number of involved organs. There were two drug-related deaths in arm B due to severe myelosuppression followed by mucositis and sepsis. Of nonhematologic toxicities, diarrhea was more frequently observed in arm B, as were mucositis and infectious complications. Our results indicate that the sequential schedule MTX-5-FU-LV with 20-h intervals between MTX and 5-FU is superior in terms of objective regression to 5-FU alone given at the dose and schedule used in the present study. However, MTX-5-FU-LV did not have a significant impact on survival.     

A prospective randomized trial of 5-fluorouracil versus 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

Seventy-four previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were prospectively randomized into one of three treatment regimens: (1) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 450 mg/m2 as an intravenous (IV) bolus daily for five days or toxicity, then 200 mg/m2 IV bolus every other day for six doses; (2) methotrexate (MTX) 50 mg/m2 in normal saline by IV infusion over four hours followed by an IV bolus of 5-FU 600 mg/m2. This was administered weekly for 4 weeks and then every 2 weeks. (3) Leucovorin 500 mg/m2 in a two-hour IV infusion of normal saline with 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as an IV bolus one hour after the Leucovorin began every week for 6 weeks. The combined complete and partial response rates in the three regimens were 11%, 5%, and 48%, respectively (P = .0009). The median duration of response in the 5-FU and Leucovorin regimen was 10 months. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment regimens with respect to survival time (P = .6). Toxicity in the 5-FU and Leucovorin regimen was predominantly diarrhea (13 of 30 patients, 40%). In this regimen, eight of 13 patients (52%) who developed diarrhea not only required a dose reduction of 5-FU, but also hospitalization for IV hydration. The predominant toxicity in the 5-FU alone regimen and the 5-FU and MTX regimen was leukopenia. One drug-related death occurred in each regimen.     

The influence of drug interval on the effect of methotrexate and fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

The importance of the interval between methotrexate (MTX) and fluorouracil (5-FU) was studied in 168 patients with previously untreated, measurable, advanced colorectal cancer. They were randomized to receive MTX 200 mg/m2, followed by 5-FU 600 mg/m2 either 24 hours (arm A) or 1 hour (arm B) after MTX. All patients received leucovorin (LV) 24 hours after MTX, 10 mg/m2 orally every 6 hours for six doses. The regimen was repeated every 2 weeks, with 5-FU escalation as tolerated. Arm A was significantly better than arm B with respect to overall response rate (29% v 14.5%, P = .026), time to progression (TTP; median, 9.9 months v 5.9 months, P = .009), and survival (median, 15.3 months v 11.4 months, P = .003). Significant differences between arms were not found in response rate, median TTP, or median survival for the subgroup of patients with rectal primaries who comprised 20% of the patients in each arm. Significant factors prognostic for survival were performance status and number of metastases, as well as treatment. Age did not influence survival. Toxicity was similar in both arms and was primarily gastrointestinal. More mucositis was seen in arm A. There were four toxic deaths secondary to neutropenia and infection (one from arm A and three from arm B) and three other deaths (two from arm A and one from arm B) that were possibly drug-related. The combination of MTX with LV rescue and 5-FU is an active regimen in advanced colorectal cancer; its efficacy is increased in colon, but not rectal cancer, when the interval between MTX and 5-FU is long (24 hours) rather than short (1 hour).     

Double Modulation of 5-Fluorouracil in the Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma: Report of a Trial with Sequential Methotrexate, Intravenous (Loading Dose) Folinic Acid, 5-Fluorouracil, and a Literature Review

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) modulation with either folinic acid (FA) or methotrexate (MTX) has improved 5-FU's potential cytoreductivity. We combined MTX and FA with 5-FU to further augment 5-FU's cytoreductivity. Patients (n = 34) with advanced colorectal carcinoma were first given intravenous MTX (escalated from 30 mg/m2 to 70 mg/m²). FA (100 mg/m²) was infused 17-24 hr later, followed by 5-FU (600 mg/m²). Oral rescue doses of FA were begun 24 hr after MTX. Patients were treated every 2 weeks. No previously treated patient (n = 6) responded. Eight of the remaining 28 (29%) (95% confidence interval, 15-47%) patients achieved a PR. Median survival was 9.3 months. Toxicity (primarily gastrointestinal) necessitated dosage modification in 10 patients (29%). These results, in addition to a literature review, reveal that the manipulation of 5-FU by two modulating agents does not improve the response rate seen with single-agent modulation.     

High-dose methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. A randomized study of two pretreatment intervals

Thirty-two patients with untreated advanced colorectal carcinoma received high-dose methotrexate pretreatment followed sequentially by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Patients were randomized to receive high-dose methotrexate pretreatment at one of two intervals (0 h or 3 h before 5-FU). There were 16 patients in each study arm. The median methotrexate dose was 1,000 mg/m2 (range, 600-1,200 mg/m2) and that of 5-FU was 1,000 mg/m2 (range, 800-1,200 mg/m2). Treatments were repeated every 21 days. Three patients achieved partial remission (1 in the 3-h interval arm and 2 in the 0-h interval arm). As the response rate using this regimen was noted to be 9% with a less than 5% chance of achieving a response rate higher than 20%, we terminated this study although the therapy resulted in mild-to-moderate but infrequent toxicity. We thus conclude that pretreatment with high-dose methotrexate given at short intervals followed by 5-FU has no significant activity against colorectal carcinoma.     

Combined MTX.5-FU.CDGP for the treatment of head and neck cancer

Combination chemotherapy including 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and nedaplatin (CDGP) with methotrexate (MTX) and leucovorin (LV) was administered for modulation in patients with head and neck cancer. We treated 19 patients with MTX.5-FU.CDGP consisting of 150 mg/body of MTX on day 1 followed by a 3-day continuous infusion of 5-FU at 3,500 mg/m2 and 17 injections of LV at 15 mg and infusion of CDGP at 100 mg/m2. Six patients had recurrent head and neck cancer, and 13 had newly diagnosed disease. Eleven of the new patients were concurrently treated with radiation therapy. Treatment-associated toxicity was significant, including mucositis and myelosuppression, but acceptable. Sixteen patients were eligible for evaluation of response. The overall complete response rate was 75.0% (12/16). Patients treated with radiotherapy had a 90.0% (9/10) overall complete response rate.     

Randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil and carboplatin plus fluorouracil versus methotrexate in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) conducted a randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil (5-FU) and carboplatin plus 5-FU versus single-agent methotrexate (MTX) in patients with recurrent and metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck. The primary objective was to compare separately the response rates of each combination regimen to standard weekly MTX. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred seventy-seven patients diagnosed with SCC of the head and neck were randomized to one of three treatments: (1) cisplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2 per day for a 96-hour continuous infusion repeated every 21 days; (2) carboplatin 300 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2 per day for a 96-hour continuous infusion repeated every 28 days; and (3) MTX 40 mg/m2 IV given weekly. RESULTS: All three treatment regimens were well tolerated. However, both hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were significantly greater with cisplatin plus 5-FU compared with MTX (P = .001). Toxicity from carboplatin plus 5-FU was intermediate compared with the other regimens. The complete and partial response rates were 32% for cisplatin plus 5-FU, 21% for carboplatin plus 5-FU, and 10% for MTX. The comparison of cisplatin plus 5-FU to MTX was statistically significant (P less than .001), and the comparison of carboplatin plus 5-FU to MTX was of borderline statistical significance (P = .05). Median response durations and median survival times were similar for all three treatment groups. Logistic regression models showed that only treatment assigned was associated significantly with response (P = .001). Cox proportional hazards models indicated that only performance status was associated significantly with survival (P less than .01). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that combination chemotherapy resulted in improved response rates but was associated with an increased toxicity and no improvement in overall survival. Therefore, new treatments that may alter the course of disease in recurrent head and neck cancer patients still need to be identified.     

Sequence-dependence of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in advanced and recurrent gastric cancer

This randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the safety and effectiveness of different sequences of treatment with cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with unresectable advanced and post-operative recurrent gastric cancer. Patients with unresectable advanced or post-operative recurrent gastric cancer were randomly assigned by a registration center to group A or B. Group A received CDDP (80 mg/m(2)) as a continuous 2-h intravenous infusion on day 1 and 5-FU (700 mg/m(2)) as a continuous intravenous infusion on days 2-5. Group B was given 5-FU (700 mg/m(2)) as a continuous intravenous infusion on days 1-4, followed by CDDP (80 mg/m(2)) as a continuous 2-h intravenous infusion on day 5. Each course of chemotherapy was repeated every 28 days. A total of 74 patients were enrolled. One patient died accidentally, and 5 could not be evaluated. Response was assessable in 68 patients. The response rate was 31.3% (10/32) in group A as compared with 13.9% (5/36) in group B. Although the response rate was higher in Group A, the difference was not significant (p=0.085). The response rate in patients with diffuse type tumors was significantly lower in group B. There was no difference between the groups in response among patients with intestinal type tumors. The median overall survival was 239 and 174 days and time to progression was 175 and 140 days in group A and group B, respectively. Although there were trends toward longer survival and time to progression in group A, the differences between the groups were not statistically significant. There was also no difference in the type or incidence of adverse reactions. The results of this controlled study indicate that the overall response rate was slightly but not significantly higher in patients who received CDDP before 5-FU. Among patients with diffuse type tumors, the response rate was significantly lower when 5-FU was administered before CDDP. Our results suggest that CDDP should be given before 5-FU in patients with gastric cancer when treated with a combination of CDDP and 5-FU.     

Sequential 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate. Negative experience in metastatic colorectal cancer

Forty-two patients with measurable advanced colorectal cancer were treated with sequential methotrexate (MTX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), followed by folinic acid rescue. Twenty-one patients had received prior chemotherapy, mainly 5-FU (group 1) and remaining 21 patients had not been previously treated by cytotoxic agents (group 2). Two different treatment schedules were used. Regimen I (27 patients): MTX 250 mg/m2 was infused over 1 hour. Two hours from start 5-FU 600 mg/m2 was given as intravenous bolus. Folinic acid rescue started 24 hours after MTX infusion. Regimen II (15 patients): MTX 250 mg/m2 was given as 1-hour infusion. Three hours after the start of MTX a 46-hour 5-FU infusion (2000 mg/m2) was started. Folinic acid rescue as in regimen I. The chemotherapy courses were repeated every second week. After 3 cycles only one patient had partial response, 33 had no change and 8 progressive disease. The median time until progression was 2 1/2 months in group 1 and 4 months in group 2. The median survival was 7 months in group 1 and 10 1/2 months in group 2. Almost identical results were obtained by the two treatment schedules. The toxicity of both regimens was low.     

Biochemical modulation of fluorouracil: comparison of methotrexate,folinic acid,and fluorouracil versus folinic acid and fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized trial

 Recent advances in biochemical pharmacology have revealed the basis for the biological modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by methotrexate (MTX) and folinic acid (FA). Sequential use of MTX given 24 h prior to 5-FU has resulted in enhanced cell kill in vitro and in vivo. In addition, administration of FA prior to 5-FU has led to potentiation of 5-FU action by stabilization of the ternary complex of thymidine synthase. In the present randomized study, two groups of patients with advanced colorectal cancer were treated as follows: 43 patients (pts) in group A received 5-FU + FA, whereas 45 pts in group B received 5-FU + FA + MTX. The dosage was as follows: group A received FA i. v. at 300 mg/m² per day, prior to i. v. 5-FU at 500 mg/m² per day on days 1 – 4; group B was given MTX i. v. at 130 mg/m² per day on day 0, followed 24 h later by FA at 15 mg q6h × 6, and 5-FU + FA was started on day 1 and given at the same doses and schedule described for group A. Objective responses were achieved by 8/43 pts in group A (1 complete response and 7 partial responses) and by 18/45 pts in group B (3 complete and 15 partial responses), all occurring in the liver. There was no significant difference in the median time to progression (group A 6.1 months, group B 6.8 months) or the median survival (group A 9.2 months, group B 10.3 months). Toxicity was significantly greater in group B [grade 2 – 3 mucositis 20% versus only 2% in group A (P <0.0001); grade 3 diarrhea in group B 15% versus 3% in group A (P <0.001)]. According to our results, double biological modulation of 5-FU with MTX + FA led to an enhanced response rate with increased toxicity as compared with the 5-FU + FA regimen given at less than its maximally tolerated dose. Received: 8 May 1995 / Accepted: 25 January 1996     

A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized phase III trial of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, plus or minus trimetrexate, in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Trimetrexate (TMTX) biochemically modulates 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LCV). Two phase II trials demonstrated promising activity for TMTX/5-FU/LCV in patients with untreated advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). This trial was designed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of TMTX/5-FU/LCV as first-line treatment in ACC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with ACC were randomized in double-blind fashion to receive placebo or TMTX (110 mg/m2) intravenously (i.v.) followed 24 h later by i.v. LCV 200 mg/m2, and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 plus oral LCV rescue. Both schedules were given weekly for 6 weeks every 8 weeks. Patients were evaluated for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tumor response, quality of life (QoL) and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 382 eligible patients were randomized. Significant toxicities were noted more frequently with TMTX/5-FU/LCV. Diarrhea was the most common grade 3 or 4 side-effect (41% and 28% on the TMTX and placebo arms, respectively). QoL scores and response rates did not differ between treatment arms. PFS was 5.3 months and 4.4 months in the TMTX and placebo arms, respectively (P = 0.77; Wilcoxon). OS was 15.8 months and 16.8 months, respectively (P = 0.73; Wilcoxon). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of TMTX to a weekly regimen of 5-FU/LCV worsened grade 3 or 4 diarrhea. The inclusion of TMTX did not yield any significant improvements in response rate, PFS or OS.     

Prospective randomized trial of one-hour sequential versus simultaneous methotrexate plus 5-fluorouracil in advanced and recurrent squamous cell head and neck cancer

Results from experimental systems suggest that the combination of methotrexate (MTX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) produces synergistic cytotoxic effects that are dependent on the sequence of drug administration. Biochemical studies have demonstrated plausible mechanisms of a synergistic effect when MTX precedes 5-FU. A variety of phase I and phase II studies have employed this sequential combination with promising but inconclusive results. In this study, 79 evaluable patients with squamous cell head and neck cancer were randomized to receive MTX (200 mg/m2 IV) and 5-FU (600 mg/m2 IV) either simultaneously or sequentially with MTX preceding 5-FU by one hour. All patients were ambulatory and patients were stratified as to whether they presented with primary disease or with recurrence after prior radiation and/or surgical therapy. The overall response rate was superior for simultaneous therapy (62%) compared with sequential therapy (38%) (p less than 0.06). Among patients with primary head and neck cancer, the stage of the disease influenced the response rate. Eight of nine stage III patients who received simultaneous therapy responded while none of the four patients who received sequential therapy responded (p less than 0.01). This study demonstrates that one-hour sequential MTX plus 5-FU is not superior to simultaneous treatment in patients with squamous cell head and neck cancer.     

Trimetrexate as biochemical modulator of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: final results of a randomised European study.

BACKGROUND: Trimetrexate (TMTX) is a biochemical modulator of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV). Phase II trials have shown promising activity of 5-FU/LV/TMTX in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). This trial evaluated the effect of TMTX in combination with 5-FU/LV as first-line treatment in ACC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with ACC were randomised to receive either intravenous LV 200 mg/m2/5-FU 600 mg/m2 or TMTX 110 mg/m2 followed 24 h later by LV 200 mg/m2/5-FU 500 mg/m2 plus oral LV rescue. Both schedules were given weekly for 6 weeks every 8 weeks. Patients were evaluated for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tumour response, quality of life (QoL) and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 365 patients were randomised. A statistically significant prolongation of median PFS was seen in patients treated with TMTX/5-FU/LV compared with 5-FU/LV (5.4 months versus 4.1 months, respectively; P = 0.03), and a trend towards a significant benefit for OS (13.4 months versus 10.5 months, respectively; P = 0.08). Tumour response, QoL and toxicity were comparable between the two arms. Diarrhoea was the most frequently occurring grade 3 or 4 toxicity (22% and 30%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of TMTX to a weekly regimen of 5-FU/LV results in a small but significant improvement in PFS without adding toxicity or worsening QoL in patients with ACC.     

Sequential administration of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and folinic acid as salvage treatment in metastatic breast cancer

Experimental data show that sequencing methotrexate (MTX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may result in synergistic antitumor activity. Moreover, the effect of 5-FU is increased by folinic acid (FA), and finally, cyclophosphamide (CPA) produces an expansion of tumor growth fraction, suggesting an increased cytotoxic effect of cycle-specific drugs subsequently administered. Based on these premises, we have performed a Phase II study with CPA (600 mg/m2 i.v., day 1), MTX (200 mg/m2 1-h i.v. infusion, day 7), 5-FU (600 mg/m2 i.v., day 8), and FA (500 mg/m2 2-h i.v. infusion, day 8 plus 15 mg p.o. every 6 h on days 8 and 9) administered every 3 weeks. Thirty-six patients with metastatic breast cancer were admitted into the study. Median age was 52 years, and all but two patients were postmenopausal. Dominant sites of metastases were soft tissues in 10 patients, bones in 7 patients, and viscera in 19 patients. All patients were pretreated with chemo- and/or hormone therapy. Sixteen patients achieved an objective response (44.5%: 1 complete response and 15 partial responses), 8 had stable disease (SD) (22.2%), and 12 progressed (33.3%). Twenty-one patients had previously received conventional CMF in an adjuvant setting (15 patients) or for metastases (6 patients): 1 complete response (CR) and 7 partial responses (PR) were obtained in the first group and 1 in the second. Major toxic effects were hair loss (56.4%), nausea and vomiting (72%), mucositis (52.5%), and leukopenia (61%). A randomized study could be useful to assess the role of sequential CMF versus conventional CMF in metastatic breast cancer patients.     

Neoadjuvant PFL augmented by methotrexate and piritrexim followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer: a feasible and active approach.

To increase the complete remission (CR) rate achieved with two cycles of cisplatin, continuous infusion fluorouracil (5-FU) and oral leucovorin (PFL) we added two antifolate drugs, methotrexate (MTX) and the lipophilic piritrexim (PTX), to the combination (PFL-MP). Twenty-eight patients with previously untreated Stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck received 2 cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 followed by a 5-day continuous infusion of 5-FU at 800 mg/m2/day and 100 mg of leucovorin administered orally every 4 hours. MTX was administered at 40 mg/m2 IV on day 15 and PTX at 75 mg orally twice daily on days 22 to 26, with cycle 2 starting on day 36. After 2 of the first 5 patients had tumor progression between days 15 and 35, the regimen was intensified to MTX 50 mg/m2, PTX 100 mg twice daily and a cycle duration of 28 days. Local therapy consisted of surgery and/or radiotherapy with concomitant 5-FU and hydroxyurea (FHX) administered every other week. Eleven patients (39%, 95% confidence intervals 21-57%) had a CR, 9 (32%) had a PR, and four patients had no response. Four patients were unevaluable for response to PFL-MP. Patients with poor performance status or N3 disease were less likely to achieve a CR. Mucositis following PFL was the dose-limiting toxicity. Local therapy included surgery in 15 patients and FHX chemoradiotherapy in 19 patients. The administration of FHX in this setting proved feasible and the regimen was given near the intended dose intensity in the majority of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion and pulse methotrexate/leucovorin for colorectal adenocarcinoma. A report of excessive toxicity

Thirteen patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma underwent treatment with continuous ambulatory 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion 300 mg/m2/day and intermittent bolus methotrexate (MTX) (200 mg/m2) with calcium leucovorin (LCV) 10 mg/m2 orally every 6 h X four to eight doses given 24 h after MTX. Although MTX administration was planned every 14 days, the average time between treatments exceeded 19 days (range 14-42) because of excessive toxicity. All patients experienced toxicity at some time in their treatment course, requiring interruption of 5-FU infusion in 12 of 13 patients. Significant toxicities included stomatitis (13 of 13 patients), hand-foot syndrome (8 of 13 patients), and diarrhea (3 of 13 patients). Toxicity did not appear to be minimized by attenuation of MTX and/or 5-FU dosage or by increasing the dose and/or duration of LCV. At this dosage schedule the addition of MTX/LCV to 5-FU infusion results in excessive and unacceptable toxicity and does not appear to improve treatment results.