Outcomes of patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a 9-year experience based on a case series of scorpio PS knees

Patellar resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an actively debated issue. This prospective study addresses fundamental questions regarding whether to resurface the patella. To do this, we compared clinical results of Scorpio PS knees with and without patellar resurfacing to determine whether there was any statistically significant difference in survivorship, function, pain, and radiographic analyses. Our study failed to demonstrate any statistical difference between the 2 groups (resurfaced versus nonresurfaced) according to knee pain, walking abilities, stair climbing, range of motion, and radiologic findings, as well as cross-correlations between patellar pain and age, gender, obesity, or etiology. Our radiologic findings did not reveal any failures of bony structures facing the metallic flange. Some knee designs can thus be seen as "patella friendly." Given the significant cost of patella resurfacing and the resulting well-known complications, we continue to avoid systematic resurfacing of the patella during Scorpio TKA.     

The need for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a literature review

The controversy over whether or not to routinely resurface the patella during a total knee arthroplasty has persisted despite three decades of successful joint replacement procedures. Advocates for routine patellar resurfacing admit the occasional need for secondary patellar resurfacing and declare increased incidence of anterior knee pain in patients with non‐resurfaced patellae as a cause for worry. Surgeons that leave the patella unresurfaced cite avoidance of complications that include patellar fracture, avascular necrosis, patellar tendon injury and instability. This review discusses the available literature on patellar resurfacing through an evidence‐based analysis of randomized and pseudo‐randomized controlled trials and published meta‐analyses to date. The published literature seems to favour resurfacing the patellar routinely. Selective patellar resurfacing would be the ideal solution if sound pre‐operative criteria could be established. So far, a method for accurately predicting which patients can avoid patellar resurfacing has not been found. Future research looking at patellar resurfacing should concentrate on developing criteria for selecting those patients that would benefit from patellar resurfacing and those that would do as well without resurfacing, and thus, limiting potential surgical complications.     

Anterior knee pain in rheumatoid patients after total knee replacement. Possible selection criteria for patellar resurfacing.

Postoperative anterior knee pain was evaluated in a consecutive series of 138 knees in 108 patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated by total knee replacement with Mark I Insall-Burstein prostheses. No knee had primary patellar resurfacing, and in the 119 knees followed up for a mean of 63.9 months, none had secondary resurfacing. Anterior knee pain was absent in 87 knees (73%), mild in 16 (13.5%) and moderate or severe in 16 (13.5%). The height of the patella above the prosthetic joint line was the only variable which was directly related to the incidence of anterior knee pain. The sensitivity and specificity of patellar height measurements for identifying patients with or without pain were derived. From these data, a selective policy of resurfacing the patella in those at risk was adopted. Choosing a patellar height of 15 mm or less, patellar resurfacing could be avoided in 80% of patients likely to have no pain, and the patella could be resurfaced in 65% of those likely to have anterior knee pain.     

Systematic review of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Controversies existing over resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty remain in the literature. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty. We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE for published randomised clinical trials relevant to patellar resurfacing. The relative risk of reoperation was significantly lower for the patellar resurfacing group than for the nonresurfacing group (relative risk 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.38–0.84, P = 0.004). The overall incidence of postoperative anterior knee pain of the 1,421 knees included was 12.9% in the patellar resurfacing group and 24.1% in the nonresurfacing group. The existing evidence indicates that patellar resurfacing can reduce the risk of reoperation with no improvement in postoperative knee function or patient satisfaction over total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Whether it can decrease the incidence of anterior knee pain remains uncertain.     

Isolated Resurfacing of the Previously Unresurfaced Patella Total Knee Arthroplasty

Postoperative anterior knee pain can be challenging after primary total knee arthroplasty. Isolated patellar resurfacing may provide symptomatic improvement in those patients with an unresurfaced patella. Seventeen isolated patellar resurfacing procedures were performed. Patient outcomes were evaluated using the Knee Society clinical and roentgenographic evaluation systems. Continued symptomatology and overall patient satisfaction were also analyzed. No revisions have been necessary at 47 months of follow-up. Overall, Knee Society knee scores and knee function scores significantly improved. Eight patients (53%) are asymptomatic and were satisfied with the procedure, whereas 7 patients (47%) continue to have anterior knee pain and are unsatisfied. Isolated patellar resurfacing for anterior knee pain in total knee arthroplasty with an unresurfaced patella has a low morbidity and revision rate but may not provide patients with predictable symptomatic improvement.     

Patellar Resurfacing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BackgroundThe management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the evidence regarding the use of patellar resurfacing in TKA.MethodsA meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to compare outcomes between knees receiving patellar resurfacing vs those not receiving resurfacing during primary TKA. Outcomes of interest were the Knee Society Scores, reoperation rates, anterior knee pain, patient satisfaction, Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscores, and range of motion.ResultsTwenty RCTs met all eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. There were statistically significant differences favoring the resurfaced group in the knee component and functional component of Knee Society Scores that were not clinically significant. There was an increased risk of reoperation among knees that did not receive resurfacing with number needed to treat to prevent one case of reoperation of 25 knees (for reoperation for any reason) and 33 knees (for reoperation for anterior knee pain). There were no statistically significant differences in any other outcomes.ConclusionThe only clear relationship is that knees that do not receive patellar resurfacing are more likely to receive reoperation, most often for secondary resurfacing. However, the disease burden of differing complication profiles associated with resurfacing and nonresurfacing groups remains unclear. Continuing to collect data from large, well-designed RCTs would be beneficial in guiding management of the patella during TKA.     

Secondary resurfacing of the patella after primary total knee arthroplasty does the anterior knee pain resolve?

Although it has been shown that the risk of anterior knee pain is greater in patients with nonresurfaced patellae, it is not exactly clear whether the pain would resolve with secondary resurfacing of the patella. Thirty-nine patients (41 knees) underwent secondary patellar resurfacing between January 2001 and January 2007. The mean age was 66 years. The mean body mass index was 29.2 kg/m². The average time from primary total knee arthroplasty to resurfacing procedure was 29 months. The mean follow-up was 54 months. Anterior knee pain was the indication for secondary resurfacing in all patients. Although the clinical and functional knee scores improved significantly for whole cohort, 8 patients (8 knees) were dissatisfied with the outcome of surgery. This study highlights that secondary resurfacing is not an always rewarding procedure and patients need to be consulted appropriately with regard to the outcome.     

Patellar resurfacing reduces pain after TKA for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

Influence of patellar resurfacing after knee replacement and the frequency of patella infera and its relation to the postoperative appearance of the knee pain were assessed in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Seventy-seven total knee arthroplasties using the AGC prosthesis with nonconstrained components were done on 52 patients with a mean followup of 7.3 years (range, 3-13 years). Anterior knee pain was present in 14 of 30 patients (47%) with an unreplaced patella and in two of 18 patients (11%) with patella resurfacing. The patella was replaced in 18 patients (35%) and in 23 of 77 knees (30%). Neither revision surgery of implanted patellar components nor any later resurfacing of an unreplaced patella were done during the followup. Preoperatively using the Insall-Salvati ratio, the majority of knees (54 of 77) had a low-riding patella. Patella infera occurred commonly in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. No connection between patella infera and anterior knee pain was found.     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial

BACKGROUND: The management of the patella in total knee arthroplasty is still problematic. We aimed to identify differences in the clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty according to whether or not patellar resurfacing had been performed in a prospective, randomized study of 220 osteoarthritic knees. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty total knee arthroplasties in 201 patients were randomly assigned to be performed with either resurfacing or retention of the patella, and the results were followed for a mean of forty-eight months (range, thirty-six to seventy-nine months) in a double-blind (both patient and clinical evaluator blinded), prospective study. Evaluation was performed annually by an independent observer and consisted of assessment with the Knee Society clinical rating system, specific evaluation of anterior knee pain, a stair-climbing test, and radiographic examination. RESULTS: Fifteen (12%) of the 128 knees without patellar resurfacing and nine (10%) of the ninety-two knees with patellar resurfacing underwent a revision or another type of reoperation related to the patellofemoral articulation. This difference was not significant (chi square with one degree of freedom = 0.206, p = 0.650). At the time of the latest follow-up, there was a significantly higher incidence of anterior pain (chi square with one degree of freedom = 5.757, p = 0.016) in the knees that had not had patellar resurfacing. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent patellar resurfacing had superior clinical results in terms of anterior knee pain and stair descent. However, anterior knee pain still occurred in patients with patellar resurfacing, and nine (10%) of the ninety-two patients in that group underwent a revision or another type of reoperation involving the patellofemoral joint. Weight but not body mass index was associated with the development of anterior knee pain in the patients without patellar resurfacing, a finding that suggests that patellofemoral dysfunction may be a function of joint loading rather than obesity.     

Asymmetric patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Three hundred consecutive primary, cemented, condylar total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were reviewed for the presence of asymmetric patella resurfacing using a postoperative Merchant or sunrise patellar radiograph. Twenty-one knees in 14 patients were found to have the patella asymmetrically resurfaced. Asymmetric resurfacing typically involved the inadvertent preferential resurfacing of the lateral facet with underresection of bone from the medial patellar facet. All patients underwent follow-up for a minimum of 5 years, with a mean follow-up of 7.5 years. Of the 21 knees, 3 revisions were required for patellar complications. One patellar component was loose on radiographs and there was marked patellofemoral pain in 6 knees. Overall, 11 of 21 knees (52%) underwent revision or were recommended for revision for patellar complications or had anterior knee pain that limited activities. Inadvertent asymmetric patella resurfacing using the kinematic condylar implant adversely affects the outcome after TKA.     

Evidence in orthopaedics: patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Abstract Four good quality randomized clinical trials comparing patellar resurfacing versus noresurfacing in knee arthroplasty are analyzed. The outcomes evaluated were anterior knee pain, scores on the Knee Societys rating system and reoperation.No relevant differences were found in knee scores, but anterior knee pain was less frequent in patients with patellar resurfacing. Few patients had severe anterior knee pain. Still, patients with anterior knee pain were less satisfied with the clinical result. Studies with longer follow-up showed that anterior knee pain increased with time in both groups. A clinically relevant increase in reoperation rate in the nonresurfaced group could not be excluded with the numbers available.Anterior knee pain seems to be influenced by the decision of resurfacing the patella during knee arthoplasty. Although it is not associated with important changes in knee scores, patients perceive it as a cause of insatisfaction. Influence of patellar resurfacing on implant supervivence is not clear.     

Total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing

One hundred and eleven total knee replacements without patellar resurfacing were followed-up for a minimum of 48.8 months (range 48.8-108.2 months; average 78.2 months). Evaluation was performed using the Knee Society Clinical Rating System (KS-CRS). Preoperatively, the mean knee score was 34.3 points and the mean function score was 42.2 points. Postoperatively, this knee score improved to a mean of 91.1 points and the function score improved to mean of 89.6 points at the most recent follow-up. There were no significant differences among the knees with mild, moderate, or severe degenerative change to the patella with regard to the preoperative (p=0.83) and postoperative (p=0.39) knee pain score. It seems likely that the postoperative knee pain is not related to the severity of degenerative change to the patella in total knee arthroplasties performed without patellar resurfacing, and none of those patients required patellar resurfacing to achieve knee pain relief.     

The role of patellar resurfacing in TKA. Point

While controversy persists, scientific evidence favoring patellar resurfacing in primary TKA is abundant. The literature demonstrates a substantially higher incidence of anterior knee pain and reoperation rates if the patella is not resurfaced primarily. Prospective, randomized studies have reported reoperation rates to convert unresurfaced patellas to resurfaced patellas exceed those for complications after patellar resurfacing. When resurfacing the patella, strict surgical principles are paramount to avoid complications. These include duplicating the original patella thickness, maintaining the patellar blood supply, achieving central patellar tracking, and properly positioning the femoral, tibial, and patellar components. Optimum prosthetic design features for patella resurfacing include an anatomic, asymmetric trochlear groove that is broad, extended, (distally and posteriorly) and deeper compared with first-generation designs.     

A meta-analysis of patellar replacement in total knee arthroplasty

From individual randomized studies it is unclear whether the patella should be replaced during total knee replacement. We did a meta-analysis to provide quantitative data to compare patellar resurfacing with nonresurfacing during total knee arthroplasty. Only randomized, controlled trials reported between January 1966 and August 2003 comparing patellar replacement with patella retention were included for a total of 12 studies. Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data from papers. The outcomes identified were reoperations for patellar problems, anterior knee pain, knee scores, stair climbing, and patient satisfaction. The resurfaced patella performed better, and we found an increased relative risk (defined by the ratio of the risk of the event in the resurfaced group on the risk of the event in the nonresurfaced group) for reoperation, for significant anterior knee pain, and for significant pain during stair climbing when the patella was left unresurfaced. No differences were observed between the two groups for International Knee Society function score, Hospital for Special Surgery score, and for patient satisfaction. Despite these general findings, forming a definitive conclusion is difficult because many confounding factors, such as component design, surgeon experience, and technical aspects of the surgery, might influence the result in a patient.     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective,randomized study

BACKGROUND: Anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty is a common complaint and typically is attributed to the patellofemoral joint. The purpose of the present study was to compare the outcome of resurfacing and nonresurfacing of the patella, particularly with regard to anterior knee pain, and to clarify the indications for patellar resurfacing at the time of total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized study of 514 consecutive primary press-fit condylar total knee replacements. The patients were randomized to either resurfacing or retention of the patella. They were also randomized to either a cruciate-substituting or a cruciate-retaining prosthesis as part of a separate trial. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.3 years (range, two to 8.5 years), and the patients were assessed with use of the Knee Society rating, a clinical anterior knee pain score, and the British Orthopaedic Association patient-satisfaction score. The assessment was performed without the examiner knowing whether the patella had been resurfaced. At the time of follow-up, there were 474 knees. Thirty-five patients who had a bilateral knee replacement underwent resurfacing on one side only. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of anterior knee pain was 25.1% (fifty-eight of 231 knees) in the nonresurfacing group, compared with 5.3% (thirteen of 243 knees) in the resurfacing group (p < 0.0001). There was one case of component loosening. Ten of eleven patients who underwent secondary resurfacing had complete relief of anterior knee pain. The overall postoperative knee scores were lower in the nonresurfacing group, and the difference was significant among patients with osteoarthritis (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the resurfacing and nonresurfacing groups with regard to the postoperative function score. Patients who had a bilateral knee replacement were more likely to prefer the resurfaced side. CONCLUSIONS: As the present study showed a significantly higher rate of anterior knee pain following arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing, we recommend patellar resurfacing at the time of total knee replacement when technically possible.     

髌骨软骨退变分级对保留髌骨型全膝关节置换术疗效的影响

 目的 探讨髌骨软骨退变Outerbridge分级对保留髌骨型全膝关节置换术疗效的影响。方法 对2007年2月至2010年1月因膝关节退变性骨关节炎行保留髌骨型全膝关节置换术的151例进行回顾性分析。男65例,女86例;年龄56～82岁,平均(65±5.0)岁。随访时间2～5年,平均3.5年。术中对髌骨软骨退变分级的评定采用Outerbridge标准,统计末次随访时不同髌骨软骨退变分级患者的满意度及膝前痛发生情况,视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)>3分判定为有膝前痛;比较不同髌骨软骨退变分级患者的美国膝关节学会评分(Knee Society Scale,KSS)及髌骨评分。结果 OuterbridgeⅠ级18例、Ⅱ级36例、Ⅲ级62例、Ⅳ级35例。膝前痛发生率4.0%(6/151),其中轻度疼痛4例、中度2例。无翻修病例,总体满意率96.7%(146/151)。不同髌骨软骨退变分级患者的满意度(H=5.54,P=0.14)、膝前痛发生率(H=0.56, P=0.91)、KSS膝评分(F=1.95, P=0.12)、功能评分(F=2.11,P=0.10)及髌骨评分(F=1.35, P=0.26)的差异均无统计学意义。结论 不同髌骨软骨退变分级患者行保留髌骨型全膝关节置换术后疗效无差异,对退变性骨关节炎患者行全膝关节置换术时无须置换髌骨。     

The role of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

The ideal treatment of the patella in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis (OA) remains unclear. Although data exist in the literature to support either resurfacing or not resurfacing the patella, evidence continues to emerge that unresurfaced patellas deteriorate with time. Recent prospective, randomized studies also favor patellar resurfacing over retaining the native patella, reporting reoperation rates to convert unresurfaced to resurfaced patellas exceeding those for complications after patellar resurfacing. In addition, the incidence of residual patellofemoral pain after secondary resurfacing is substantially higher than when patellofemoral resurfacing is done primarily. Patient selection criteria are critical in the decision-making process. Patellofemoral complications, the greatest argument against resurfacing, have been diminished with improved surgical techniques and implant design.     

全膝关节置换术中髌骨面修整与髌骨置换的比较研究

目的比较全膝关节置换术髌骨面修整和髌骨置换的临床结果。方法2002年1月至12月对60例（60膝）行初次全膝关节置换术的骨性关节炎患者进行前瞻性、随机化研究。所有患者接受相同的后交叉韧带替代型全膝关节假体（PFC）,患者随机行髌骨面修整（髌骨面修整组）或髌骨置换（髌骨置换组）。58例患者平均随访54个月（40～60个月）,对其进行临床评价,包括膝关节协会评分（KSS）、膝关节活动度（ROM）、患者满意度和X线检查。结果两组患者KSS总评分（P=0．12）、KSS疼痛评分（P=0．90）、患者满意度（P=0．22）无明显差异;两组术后膝前痛的发生率均为10％亦无明显差异。两组ROM（P=0．028）和KSS功能评分（P=0．0098）差异有统计学意义。结论全膝关节置换术不论是髌骨面修整还是髌骨置换均能明显减轻疼痛和改善功能。术后膝前痛可能与假体设计和手术技术有关,并非与是否置换髌骨有关。     

Secondary resurfacing of the patella for persistent anterior knee pain after primary knee arthroplasty

Out of a total of 623 patients who, over a ten-year period, underwent primary total knee replacement (TKR) without patellar resurfacing, 20 underwent secondary resurfacing for chronic anterior knee pain. They were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using the clinical and radiological American Knee Society score. The mean follow-up was 36.1 months (12 to 104). The mean knee score improved from 46.7 to 62.2 points and the mean functional score from 44.7 to 52.2 points. Only 44.4% of the patients, however, reported some improvement; the remainder reported no change or deterioration. The radiographic alignment of the TKR did not influence the outcome of secondary resurfacing of the patella. Complications were noted in six of the 20 patients including fracture and instability of the patella and loss of movement. Anterior knee pain after TKR remains difficult to manage. Secondary resurfacing of the patella is not advocated in all patients since it may increase patient dissatisfaction and hasten revision.