Lamotrigine Therapy for Partial Seizures: A Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Trial

Summary: The efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (LTG), a new antiepileptic drug (AED), were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study of 98 patients with refractory partial seizures. Each treatment period lasted 14 weeks. Most patients were titrated to a LTG maintenance dose of 400 mglday. Seizure frequency with LTG decreased by ≥50%, as compared with placebo, in one fifth of patients. Overall median seizure frequency decreased by 25% with LTG as compared with placebo (p < 0.001). With LTG, the number of seizure days decreased by 18% as compared with placebo (p < 0.01), and investigator global evaluation of overall patient clinical status favored LTG by 2: 1 (p = 0.013). Plasma LTG concentrations appeared to be linearly related to dosage. LTG had no clinically important effects on the plasma concentrations of concomitant AEds. Adverse experiences were generally minor and most frequently were CNS-related (e.g., ataxia, dizziness, diplopia, headache). Most were transient and resolved without discontinuing treatment. Five patients withdrew as a result of adverse experiences while receiving LTG, including 3 patients with rash. One placebo patient was also withdrawn because of rash. The addition of twice-daily LTG to an existing AED regimen was safe, effective, and well tolerated in these medically refractory partial seizure patients.     

Lamotrigine Monotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Untreated Epilepsy: A Double-Blind Comparison with Phenytoin

PURPOSE: Lamotrigine is an effective add-on therapy against a range of epileptic seizure types. Comparative studies with carbamazepine (CBZ) as monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy suggest similar efficacy. In this study, lamotrigine (LTG) and phenytoin (PHT) are compared. METHODS: In a double-blind parallel-groups study, 181 patients with newly diagnosed untreated partial seizures or secondarily or primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures were randomised to two treatment groups. One group (n = 86) received LTG titrated over 6 weeks from a starting dose of 100 mg/day. The other (n = 95) received PHT titrated from 200 mg/day. Treatment continued for < or =48 weeks. RESULTS: The percentages of patients remaining on each treatment and seizure free during the last 24 and 40 weeks of the study, and times to first seizure after the first 6 weeks of treatment (dose-titration period), did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. These were measures of efficacy. Time to discontinuation, a composite index of efficacy and safety, likewise did not distinguish between treatments. Adverse events led to discontinuation of 13 (15%) patients from LTG and 18 (19%) from PHT. The adverse-event profile for LTG was dominated by skin rash [discontinuation of 10 (11.6%) patients compared with five (5.3%) from PHT] rather than central nervous system side effects: asthenia, somnolence, and ataxia were each significantly more frequent in the PHT group. The high rate of rash with LTG was probably due to the high starting dose and may be avoidable. A quality-of-life instrument, the SEALS inventory, favoured LTG. Patients taking PHT showed the biochemical changes expected of an enzyme-inducing drug, whereas those taking LTG did not. CONCLUSIONS: LTG and PHT monotherapy were similarly effective against these seizure types in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. LTG was better tolerated, more frequently causing rash, but with a lower incidence of central nervous system side effects.     

Lamotrigine High-Dose Tolerability and Safety in Patients with Epilepsy: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Eleven-Week Study

Summary: Purpose: This study was undertaken to evaluate the dose tolerability and safety of a chronic ascending twice-daily (b.i.d.) dosage regimen of 700 mg/day larnotrigine (LTG) and to include determination of the LTG pharmacokinetic profile at doses 500 mg/day in patients receiving concomitant enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Methods: Twelve adult male epileptic patients treated with enzyme-inducing AEDs received 700 mg/day (b.i.d.) oral LTG (n = 8) or placebo (controls, n = 4). For 3 weeks, as outpatients they had their LTG dosage increased from 100 to 400 mg/day. Then, in a clinical research study unit, patients received regimens of 500, 600, and 700 mg/day for 1 week each. Controls received matching placebo in the same sequence. At study end, dosages were tapered in 2 weeks. Follow-up evaluations were made 7 days later. Results: Five LTG patients tolerated 700 mg/day for 1 week. LTG was reduced to 600 mg/day in a patient with mild diplopia and to 500 mg/day in a patient with mild oscillopsia and diplopia. One patient discontinued 300-mg/day therapy with a moderately intense diffuse papular skin rash, attributed to LTG. Headache, drowsiness, faintness, and diplopia, the common adverse events (AEs), were mild to moderate in intensity and occurred in 50–75% of patients in both groups (except for diplopia, occurring only with LTG). Concomitant AED plasma concentrations were not markedly changed by LTG. LTG pharmacokinetics were linear over the range of 500–700 mg/day. Conclusions: LTG doses 700 mg/day can be tolerated in patients receiving concomitant enzyme-inducing AEDs.     

Vigabatrin in the Treatment of Epilepsy: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

The efficacy and tolerability of vigabatrin (gamma-vinyl GABA, GVG), given as add-on therapy to 23 adult outpatients with severe drug-resistant epilepsy (17 with partial seizures), were studied using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. The study consisted of two 7-week periods during which vigabatrin and placebo were administered in random sequence. Dosage was 1.0 g twice daily for patients weighing less than or equal to 65 kg and 1.5 g twice daily for patients weighing greater than 65 kg. Three patients were dropped from the study, two for reasons unrelated to treatment and one because of the appearance of vertigo, headache, dysarthria, and ataxia, which subsided rapidly when vigabatrin was stopped (3 g daily). Sixteen of the 20 patients available for analysis showed a decrease in the total number of seizures as compared with the placebo period. Of these, 12 showed a greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency and 4 of the 12 showed a greater than 75% reduction. Both the total number of seizures and the number of partial seizures were significantly reduced by vigabatrin (p less than 0.01). Only in the patient who dropped out were severe adverse effects seen. The most frequently reported unwanted effect was mild drowsiness, which developed in seven patients on vigabatrin and in one on placebo. Positive effects, however, were also seen with six patients who reported an improved sense of well-being while receiving vigabatrin as compared with only 1 during the placebo period. No consistent changes in electrocardiogram (ECG), electroencephalogram (EEG), and visual-, auditory-, and somatosensory-evoked potentials were seen during the study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The Efficacy of Lamotrigine in Children and Adolescents with Refractory Generalized Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study

Summary: Purpose: We report a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of lamotrigine (LTG) as add-on treatment in therapy-resistant, generalized epilepsy in children and adolescents (n = 30).
Methods: Twenty patients had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Each patient acted as his or her own control. LTG and placebo were randomly added to existing antiepileptic medication (AEDs). The LTG dosage was individualized in an open phase preceding the placebo/treatment phase. Patients who responded to LTG in the open phase went on to the double-blind phase. "Responders" were defined as patients with a >50% seizure reduction or less severe seizures or both, or improved behavior or improved motor skills or both. "Nonresponders" were defined as children who showed no positive effects of LTG with plasma levels of 10 μg/ml or children who had adverse events during the open phase.
Results: There was a clear statistically significant reduction of seizure frequency in LTG compared with placebo treatment. None of the children studied showed abnormal biochemical or hematologic findings, or changes in plasma levels of concomitantly administered AEDs.
Conclusions: LTG is a well-tolerated and effective treatment in children with intractable generalized epilepsies, including those with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. The study design allowed a double-blind placebo-controlled assessment of LTG although the participating children used 19 different AED combinations at entry.     

Clobazam in Therapy-Resistant Patients with Partial Epilepsy: A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study

Clobazam was compared with placebo as antiepileptic adjunct medication in 129 therapy-resistant epileptic patients who were mainly suffering from complex partial seizures. The study was performed in five European countries according to a double-blind crossover design lasting 7 months. Two treatment periods of 3 months (1 month adjustment and 2 months maintenance medication) were separated by one medication switch-over month. The difference in seizure reduction between clobazam and placebo was significant (p less than 0.05). Nineteen percent of patients receiving clobazam became seizure-free during the maintenance dose period. In contrast, freedom from seizures was not observed in any placebo patient. Electroencephalogram (EEG) signs, mood ratings, and global impressions also indicated therapeutic effects of clobazam in epilepsy. The most frequent adverse reactions to clobazam were drowsiness and dizziness. However, the sedative effects of clobazam seemed to be less pronounced in comparison with other benzodiazepines. The study gives evidence of the therapeutic value of clobazam as adjunct medication in therapy-resistant partial seizures. The use of clobazam as monotherapy and long-term treatment, as well as the particular seizure response pattern to clobazam, has to be further investigated.     

Nifedipine for Epilepsy? A Double-Blind,Placebo-Controlled Trial

The movement of calcium into neurons may be the common denominator for the triggering and propagation of seizure activity. We report results of the first double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial with the dihidropyridine calcium antagonist nifedipine (NFD) as adjuvant therapy in refractory epilepsy. Twenty-two students (12 male, 10 female, age 17-22 years) attending Lingfield Hospital School received NFD retard and matched placebo for 8 weeks in 2 doses (20 and 40 mg b.i.d. each for 4 weeks) with a washout period of 8 weeks between treatment phases. In the 20 students who completed the trial, fewer partial seizures (p less than 0.05) were documented during the first 2 weeks of NFD administration. Similarly, fewer seizure days (p less than 0.05) were reported in the first month of active treatment. This response was not sustained into the second month of the trial. Blind scoring of EEGs suggested a small improvement with NFD (p less than 0.05). More patients reported headache when receiving NFD (p less than 0.02) than placebo, but heart rate and erect and supine blood pressure remained unaffected. Mean maximum NFD concentrations were 13.1 +/- 10.4 ng/ml. A weak correlation was noted between total (p less than 0.05) and partial (p = 0.025) seizure numbers and NFD concentrations following 8 weeks of treatment. This study does not support important anticonvulsant efficacy for NFD as adjuvant therapy for refractory epilepsy at doses appropriate for the treatment of angina or hypertension. Further trials are recommended using higher doses of NFD in less severely affected patients.     

Lamotrigine therapy of epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis

PURPOSE: Lamotrigine (LTG), a newer antiepileptic drug (AED), has activity against both partial-onset and generalized seizures. Its reported benefits for behavior, and its effectiveness in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and other forms of refractory epilepsy, make it a logical choice for treatment of epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). We present our experience with LTG therapy of epilepsy in 57 patients with TSC. METHODS: Patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for clinically definite TSC. LTG was initiated and increased until improvement in seizure frequency was noted, intolerable side effects occurred, or maximal doses were reached. Seizure frequency and behavioral changes were recorded during LTG therapy and compared with those prior to the introduction of LTG. RESULTS: Twenty-four (42%) were seizure free, and 21 (37%) had a >50% reduction in seizure frequency. Eighteen (32%) had subjectively improved behavior and/or alertness with daily activities. Thirty-eight (67%) had no change in this regard, whereas one (2%) became worse. Responders were more likely to not have a history of infantile spasms, and to have experienced only partial seizures (p < 0.05). Otherwise no phenotypic correlations with response were apparent. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with TSC and epilepsy, LTG was effective and well tolerated, including as initial monotherapy. Improved alertness and behavior were apparent in many patients. The incidence of side effects is similar to that reported for other pediatric populations with symptomatic partial epilepsy. The usefulness of LTG in TSC may relate to an underlying defect of glutamatergic neurotransmission in partial epilepsy.     

Lamotrigine in Treatment of 120 Children with Epilepsy

Summary: One hundred twenty children aged 10 months to 16 years 9 months were included in three studies with lamotrigine (LTG): a single-blind study (n = 60), a pharmacokinetic study (n = 23), and a compassionate group (n = 37). At 3 months, 11 patients had become seizure-free and 34 had >50% decrease in seizure frequency. The best results involved absence epilepsy, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), and other symptomatic generalized epilepsy. Forty-two patients were followed > 1 year, 22 for a mean of 2.2 years, and there was no significant increase in seizure frequency as compared with 3-month follow-up. Fourteen patients became seizure-free for >6 months; all except 1 had generalized epilepsy. For 12 patients, treatment could be reduced to monotherapy, but for those with valproate (VPA) comedication LTG dosage had to be increased; 25% of patients with VPA monotherapy exhibited skin rash, appearing 3–18 days after starting LTG. For 4 patients, LTG could be reintroduced after VPA was withdrawn. Ten patients had ataxia and/or drowsiness and 2 had vomiting. For all other patients, tolerance was excellent.     

Positive and Negative Psychotropic Effects of Lamotrigine in Patients with Epilepsy and Mental Retardation

Summary: Purpose: To describe significant positive or negative psychotropic effects of lamotrigine (LTG) observed in epilepsy patients with mental retardation (MR).
Methods: Seven mentally retarded epilepsy patients, [5 with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS)] who experienced significant behavioral improvements or worsening after addition of LTG to their medication regimen were studied.
Results: LTG produced behavioral improvements in 4 patients. Patient 1, a 14-year-old girl, had LTG added to valproate (VPA) and thioridazine, resulting in diminished lethargy, less hyperactivity, and more appropriate speech. In a 17-year-old boy (patient 2) LTG added to VPA, phenytoin (PHT), and gabapentin (GBP) lessened irritability and hyperactivity. In patient 3, a 41-year-old woman, LTG added to PHT, VPA, and carbamazepine (CBZ) diminished lethargy and enhanced her social interactions. In patient 4, a 27-year-old man, LTG monotherapy diminished irritability and hyperactivity. Adverse behavioral effects were noted in 3 patients. In patient 5, a 43- year-old man, LTG added to PHT, phenobarbital (PB), lorazepam, sertraline, and thioridazine produced irritability, hyperactivity, and poor cooperation. In patient 6, a 29-year-old woman, LTG added to VPA produced frequent screaming, temper tantrums, increased rocking movements, and hyperactivity. In patient 7, a 29-year-old man, LTG added to VPA and PHT resulted in severe exacerbation of baseline behaviors, including self-injurious activity, temper tantrums, and failure to obey simple instructions.
Conclusions: In some patients with epilepsy and MR, LTG has significant positive or negative effects on behavior.     

Lamotrigine Hypersensitivity in Childhood Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose: To evaluate the effect of lamotrigine (LTG) on several humoral and cellular immune functions in children with epilepsy and the change in immunological status in patients with LTG-induced rash.
Methods: Sixteen children with epilepsy of unknown origin or secondary to various etiologies undergoing treatment with LTG participated in the humoral and cellular immunological study. Of these, 2 patients developed a rash during LTG treatment and are described in detail.
Results: No modifications of humoral or cellular immunity (measured at 1 and 3 months) were noted in 14 of the 16 patients during this treatment. In the 2 children who manifested rash, basal immune function was normal. In both, immediately after the skin rash appeared, there was a high increase in the percentage of activated T-helper lymphocytes (CDCDR) and activated T-suppressor lymphocytes (CDS-DR), a slight increase in percentage of B lymphocytes (CD19), and a greater increase in serum concentration of IgE. In 1 of the 2 patients, reevaluation of immunity 20 days after the rash appeared and after LTG suspension showed normal percentages of CDCDR, CDS-DR, and CD19, whereas the serum concentration of IgE had decreased.
Conclusions: The observed immunological results indicate that LTG-induced rash may be considered an immune-mediated hypersensitivity reaction.     

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Topiramate as Add-on Therapy in Patients with Refractory Partial Seizures

Summary: In a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial, we compared topiramate (TPM) with placebo as addon therapy in patients with refractory partial epilepsy. TPM was titrated either to the target dosage of 800 mg/ day [400 mg twice daily (b. i. d.)] or to the maximal tolerated dose if lower. Twenty-eight (28) patients were randomized to each treatment group. In the intent-to-treat analysis, the net median percent reduction relative to placebo in average monthly seizure rate was 54% for patients in the TPM group (p < 0.001). None of the placebo-treated patients and 43% of the patients treated with TPM experienced 250% reduction in seizures (p = 0.001), and 36% of patients assigned to TPM had a 75–100% reduction in seizures (p < 0.01). Secondarily generalized seizures were also significantly reduced in the TPM group (p = 0.044). The most common adverse events (AE) reported in the TPM group were fatigue, impaired concentation, weight loss, dizziness, and paresthesias. AE occurring either during the rapid titration of TPM or at high dosages led 21% of TPM-treated patients to withdraw from the study. Half of these occurred during the titration study period. No serious AE or clinically important changes in clinical laboratory measures were observed. The present study further establishes the favorable profile and good benefithisk ratio of TPM in resistant partial epilepsy.     

Gabapentin as Add-On Therapy in Children with Refractory Partial Seizures: A 12-Week, Multicentre, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin (Neurontin; GBP) as add-on therapy for refractory partial seizures in paediatric patients aged 3-12 years. METHODS: After a 6-week baseline period, 247 patients (54 centres) entered a 12-week double-blind phase and were randomized to receive either GBP (t.i.d., titrated to 23-35 mg/kg/ day) or placebo. Seizure activity and type were recorded daily. Efficacy variables included Response Ratio (RRatio), responder rate, and percentage change in frequency (PCH) for all partial seizures; PCH and RRatio for individual types of partial seizures; and investigator and parent/guardian global assessments of seizure frequency and patient well-being. RESULTS: RRatio for all partial seizures was significantly lower (better) for GBP-treated patients (p = 0.0407). Responder rate favored GBP, but the difference between treatment groups was not statistically significant. Median PCH for all partial seizures for the GBP treatment group (-17.0%) was better than that for the placebo group (-6.5%). Median PCH for specific seizure types showed GBP to be most effective in controlling complex partial seizures (-35%) and secondarily generalized seizures (-28%) when compared with placebo (-12%, +13%, respectively). A greater percentage of GBP-treated patients exhibited improvement according to investigator and parent/guardian global assessments, with a statistically significant difference observed in the parent/guardian global assessment of seizure-frequency reduction (p = 0.046). Three GBP patients and one placebo patient were seizure free during the double-blind treatment period. GBP was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: GBP was effective and well tolerated as an add-on therapy for partial seizures in paediatric patients with previously drug-resistant seizures.     

Lamotrigine and Seizure Aggravation in Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose: In severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (SME), multiple drug-resistant focal and generalized seizure types occur. Lamotrigine (LTG), found effective in many generalized and partial seizures, has been little used in severe childhood epilepsy syndromes with multiple seizure types. We studied the effects of LTG in SME.
Methods: Twenty-one patients with SME, aged 2–18 years, were treated with LTG, 20 in add-on and one in monotherapy. LTG was started at 0.2–2.5 mg/kg/day and increased to 2.5–12.5 mg/kg/day. For each seizure type, excluding atypical absences, >50% variations compared with the 2 months preceding LTG were considered indicators of response, also taking into account the degree of disability each seizure type produced.
Results: LTG induced worsening in 17 (80%) patients, no change in three, and improvement in one. There was >50% increase in convulsive seizures in eight (40%) of 20 patients. Myoclonic seizures worsened in six (33%) of 18 patients. Of five patients improving in at least one seizure type, four had concomitant worsening of more invalidating seizures. Clear-cut worsening appeared within 3 months in most patients but was insidious in some. LTG was suspended in 19 patients after 15 days-5 years (mean, 14 months) with consequent improvement in 18.
Conclusions: The pronounced seizure deterioration during LTG treatment was not attributable to the natural course of the disease and could be a direct effect of therapeutic LTG doses. LTG treatment seems inappropriate in SME.     

Lamotrigine Therapy in Juvenile Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of lamotrigine (LTG) therapy on epileptic seizures and general well-being in patients with juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (JNCL). METHODS: LTG was initiated in 28 patients with JNCL. The mean age of the patients at the initiation of LTG was 13.7 years (range, 6.7-28.2 years). LTG was started at a dosage of 0.1-0.5 mg/kg/day and increased every 2 weeks until a maintenance dose of 1.25-15 mg/kg/day was reached. On the basis of the indication for LTG therapy, the patients could be divided into four groups. In the first group, LTG was initiated on an add-on basis; in the second group, LTG was started as the first antiepileptic drug (AED) because of seizures, and in the third group, despite no preceding seizures, because of epileptiform activity in the whole-night polysomnography; in the fourth group, LTG replaced valproate (VPA), which was discontinued because of adverse side effects. The efficacy was assessed after 1 year on LTG. The mean follow-up time was 2.8 years (range, 1.3-5.8). RESULTS: LTG had a favorable effect in 23 of 28 patients. A decrease in frequency of seizures of > or =50% was observed in 10 and a decrease in severity of seizures in nine of the 22 patients who had preceding seizures. Increases in well-being were found in 18 of 28. During the follow-up, LTG was continued as monotherapy in 13 of 19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In light of our experiences, LTG seems to be a valuable drug in JNCL.     

Lamotrigine monotherapy compared with carbamazepine, phenytoin, or valproate monotherapy in patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE: This open-label study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine monotherapy compared with monotherapy with conventional antiepileptic drugs in patients converting from previous monotherapy because of inadequate seizure control or unacceptable side effects. METHODS: This study was conducted in 26 neurology clinics and epilepsy centers throughout the United States. The study enrolled 115 patients with epilepsy converting from previous monotherapy because of inadequate seizure control or unacceptable side effects. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 24 weeks of lamotrigine monotherapy or monotherapy with a conventional antiepileptic drug (carbamazepine, phenytoin, or valproate based on physician's choice). Patients were converted during an 相似文献   

Efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine in Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy in adults: A prospective,unblinded randomized controlled trial

PurposeControlled randomized studies recommending the clinical use of lamotrigine in adult populations with the diagnosis of Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy are still lacking. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine versus valproate in adult patients with JME.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, controlled, pragmatic, long-term and open-label treatment trial. Patients were randomized to use valproate or lamotrigine. The primary end points of the study were: (1) time from randomization to treatment failure (withdrawal); (2) time from randomization to seizures remission. Secondary ending points were: (1) frequency of clinically important adverse events and (2) change in the QOLIE-31 after randomization. The definition of seizure remission was based on disappearance of all seizure types and EEG discharges.ResultsWe found that the time to withdraw treatment after randomization was not significantly different in lamotrigine and valproate groups. Long-term seizures freedom was equal in the both groups of the trial; only 8 (19.1%) patients randomized to lamotrigine and 6 (19.4%) randomized to valproate were not seizure free after 4 months of treatment. Between 17.03% (lamotrigine) and 35.3% (valproate) of patients reported adverse reactions at some point in the intention-to treat study (p = 0.07). All subscales of the QOLIE-31 questionnaire, except that related to side effects of medication, improved more than 5 points with respect to baseline period in both groupsConclusionLamotrigine is effective in adult patients with Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy and better tolerated than valproate, although the incidence of idiosyncratic reactions could be a cause of concern.     

Cinromide in Epilepsy: A Pilot Study

Monotherapy with the experimental antiepileptic drug cinromide was evaluated in 11 adult outpatients with uncontrolled partial epilepsy. They were treated with phenytoin for 2 months, cinromide for 4 months, and carbamazepine for 4 months. Four patients withdrew from the study during or shortly after crossover to cinromide due to increased seizure frequency or severity. Of the remainder, three preferred carbamazepine, two cinromide, and two phenytoin, based on both seizure control and degree of toxicity. Overall seizure control was not significantly different with any of the three agents, but during cinromide administration secondarily generalized seizure control was uniformly worst and there was also a tendency toward decreased performance on neuropsychological tests. CNS toxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity were prominent during the first month of cinromide treatment, but subsided with time or dose reduction. No abnormalities requiring drug withdrawal were found with laboratory testing. The results suggested, at best, a very limited clinical usefulness for cinromide, and it has been withdrawn from testing by its manufacturer.