Analgesia for circumcision in a paediatric population: comparison of caudal bupivacaine alone with bupivacaine plus two doses of clonidine

BACKGROUND: Clonidine is often used to improve the duration and quality of analgesia produced by caudal epidural blockade, although the optimum dose of clonidine with bupivacaine remains uncertain. Methods: We compared the effect of clonidine, 1 and 2 microg x kg(-1), added to bupivacaine (1.25 mg x kg(-1)) with that of bupivacaine alone in 75 male children undergoing elective circumcision. RESULTS: There was a trend towards increasing duration of analgesia with increasing dose of clonidine [group B (bupivacaine) 280.7 (171.6) min, C1 (bupivacaine + clonidine 1 microg x kg(-1)) 327.8 (188.3) min and C2 (bupivacaine + clonidine 2 microg x kg(-1)) 382.0 (200.6) min], although this difference was not statistically significant. Mean time to arousal from anaesthesia was significantly prolonged with clonidine 2 microg kg(-1) (group C2 21.3 (13-36) min, group C1 14.0 (6-25) min and group B 14.4 (2-32) min. Supplementary analgesic requirements and incidence of adverse effects were low, with no differences between the groups. Conclusions: For paediatric circumcision, under general anaesthesia, the addition of clonidine 2 microg x kg(-1) to low volume (0.5 ml x kg(-1)) caudal anaesthetics has a limited clinical benefit for children undergoing circumcision.     

The addition of clonidine 2 microg.kg-1 does not enhance the postoperative analgesia of a caudal block using 0.125% bupivacaine and epinephrine 1:200,000 in children: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study

BACKGROUND: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the efficacy of 0.125% bupivacaine and epinephrine 1:200,000 with and without clonidine 2 microg.kg-1 for 'single shot' pediatric caudal analgesia. METHODS: Thirty ASA I and II children, ages 2-8 years, undergoing outpatient surgical procedures below the umbilicus received 1 ml.kg-1 0.125% bupivacaine with fresh epinephrine 1:200,000 and clonidine 2 microg.kg-1 (group-C) or 1 ml.kg-1 0.125 % bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200 000 (group-NC). All patients received a standardized general anesthetic (induction with 67% N2O in O2 and sevoflurane followed by isoflurane maintenance). Primary outcome measures were time to first rescue analgesic and number of patients requiring rescue analgesic at 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after caudal placement. Secondary outcome measures included: extubation times, Objective Pain Scale (OPS) scores, sedation scores, time in postanesthesia care unit (PACU), discharge time, number of analgesic doses given in 24 h following caudal blockade, and adverse effects (vomiting, hypotension, and bradycardia). RESULTS: There were no differences in demographics, investigated parameters, or adverse effects between groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the addition of clonidine 2 microg.kg-1 to 0.125% bupivacaine with fresh epinephrine 1:200,000 for caudal analgesia did not significantly delay the time to first rescue analgesic or decrease the overall need for rescue analgesics in children 2-8 years undergoing surgical procedures below the umbilicus.     

Analgesia for paediatric tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy with intramuscular clonidine

BACKGROUND: After undergoing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T&A), children may experience significant pain. Clonidine, an alpha2 agonist, exhibits significant analgesic properties. The current investigation sought to determine whether intramuscular (I.M.) clonidine would decrease pain in paediatric patients undergoing T&A. METHODS: Thirty-nine children undergoing elective T&A were studied. Following inhalational anaesthetic induction, fentanyl (2 microg x kg(-1)) was given intravenously, acetaminophen (paracetamol) (30 mg.kg-1) was given rectally and the children then randomly received an i.m. injection of either normal saline or clonidine (2 microg x kg(-1)). Perioperative analgesic requirements in the postanaesthesia care unit and at home following hospital discharge were evaluated. RESULTS: There were no significant demographic, analgesic consumption, haemodynamic or pain score differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: We do not recommend adding i.m. clonidine (2 microg x kg(-1)) to the analgesic regimen of children undergoing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy.     

Clonidine addition prolongs the duration of caudal analgesia

BACKGROUND: In this study, using a dose-ranging design, we examined the effects of clonidine with 0.125% bupivacaine on the duration of post-operative analgesia in caudal anaesthesia in children. METHODS: We conducted a controlled, prospective study of clonidine in caudal anaesthesia in 60 children, aged 1-10 years, undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair. Induction and maintenance of anaesthesia were performed by inhalation of sevoflurane and nitrous oxide. The children were randomized in a double-blind fashion to four groups, and were given a caudal anaesthetic with either 0.125% plain isobaric bupivacaine (1 ml/kg) or bupivacaine plus 1, 1.5 or 2 microg/kg of clonidine. The blood pressure and heart rate were recorded peri-operatively. Analgesia was evaluated by the modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (mCHEOPS) or a visual analogue scale (VAS). Paracetamol was given when the mCHEOPS score was greater than five or when the VAS score was greater than 30 mm. The monitoring of scores for pain, haemodynamic changes and post-operative nausea and vomiting was performed by nurses blind to the study allocation. RESULTS: The duration of analgesia was found to be significantly longer in the group given bupivacaine plus 2 microg/kg of clonidine (median, 650 min; range, 300-900 min). Peri-operative hypotension and bradycardia, post-operative respiratory depression and motor block were not recorded in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of clonidine to 0.125% bupivacaine prolongs the duration of post-operative analgesia without any respiratory or haemodynamic side-effects.     

Postoperative analgesia for outpatient arthroscopic knee surgery with intraarticular clonidine

Intraarticular (i.a.) local anesthetics are often used for the management and prevention of pain after arthroscopic knee surgery. Clonidine prolongs the duration of local anesthetics. We designed this study to determine whether clonidine added to an i.a. injection would result in an analgesic benefit. Fifty patients were randomly assigned to one of five groups that received clonidine (either via the subcutaneous or i.a. route) or saline placebo with or without i.a. bupivacaine, as follows: Group 1 received 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine i.a.; Group 2 received 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with clonidine (1 microg/kg) i.a.; Group 3 received 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine i.a. and subcutaneous clonidine (1 microg/kg); Group 4 received 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine (5 microg/mL) i.a.; and Group 5 received clonidine (1 microg/kg) in 30 mL of saline i.a.. The results of this study revealed a significant difference in analgesia from the i.a. administration of clonidine. The group who received a combination of i.a. bupivacaine and clonidine had a significantly decreased need for oral postoperative analgesics and an increased analgesic duration (P < 0.0001). We conclude that i.a. clonidine improved comfort in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. Implications: The intraarticular administration of clonidine along with bupivacaine results in a significant improvement in analgesia compared with either drug alone. There was an increased time to first analgesic request and a decreased need for postoperative analgesics.     

Clonidine administered as adjuvant for bupivacaine in ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block does not prolong postoperative analgesia

BACKGROUND: Coadministration of clonidine with local anesthetics is associated with improvement of the quality of peripheral nerve block and significant prolongation of postoperative analgesia. Better analgesia has been reported with clonidine in ilioinguinal nerve block compared with caudal use. The object of this study was to determine whether adding of 1 microg.kg(-1) clonidine to bupivacaine 0.25% in ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block prolongs postoperative analgesia in children. METHODS: Ninety-eight children ASA I-II aged between 1 and 12 years, scheduled for elective outpatient herniorrhaphy or orchidopexy were randomly allocated to receive an ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block either with 0.3 ml.kg(-1) bupivacaine 0.25% plus 1 microg.kg(-1) clonidine or only bupivacaine. Postoperative analgesic needs, time to the first analgesic supplementation and sedation score were assessed in hospital for 6 h postoperatively and at home by telephone call. RESULTS: Demographic data were similar in both groups. There was no statistical difference in the rate of rescue analgesia between the two groups during the first six postoperative hours (20.4% group clonidine vs 30.6% group no clonidine) (P = 0.17). A slight decrease in systolic blood pressure during surgery was reported in the clonidine group. There was no difference in the scores of sedation between the two groups. At home, 10 patients in the clonidine group and nine patients in the nonclonidine group received analgesic medication. There was no difference between the two groups regarding the number of patients receiving analgesic rescue during the first 24 h (log rank = 0.39). Parental satisfaction was high in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study failed to demonstrate any advantage in addition of 1 microg.kg(-1) clonidine to 0.25% bupivacaine for ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block compared with bupivacaine 0.25% alone.     

Caudal bupivacaine and s(+)-ketamine for postoperative analgesia in children

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether caudal s-ketamine would prolong analgesia together with caudal bupivacaine. METHODS: Thirty children, ASA I-II, 1 month-9 years, scheduled for minor inguinal or penile surgery, were randomly assigned in a prospective, double-blind fashion to receive single shot caudal blockade by either bupivacaine 0.125% 1 ml.kg(-1) (group B, n = 15) or a mixture of bupivacaine 0.125% 1 ml.kg(-1) and preservative-free s-ketamine 0.5 mg.kg(-1) (group K, n = 15). Postoperative pain was assessed by means of an observational 10-point scoring system and analgesia was administered if the pain score exceeded a value of 3. RESULTS: Within 24 h after caudal block 10 patients (67%) in group K and three patients in group B (20%) did not require additional analgesic medication (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the groups for incidence of haemodynamic changes. We did not observe any negative side-effects attributable to the caudal block or s-ketamine. Conclusions: Addition of preservative-free s-ketamine 0.5 mg.kg(-1) to caudal bupivacaine 0.125% 1 ml.kg(-1) provides significant prolongation of analgesia without producing negative side-effects.     

Caudal neostigmine with bupivacaine produces a dose-independent analgesic effect in children

PURPOSE: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and duration of varying doses of caudal neostigmine with plain bupivacaine and its side effects in children undergoing genito-urinary surgery. METHODS: In a randomized double-blind prospective study 80 boys aged two to eight years scheduled for surgical repair of hypospadias were allocated randomly to one of four groups (n = 20 each) and received either only caudal 0.25% plain bupivacaine 0.5 mL.kg(-1) (Group I) or 0.25% plain bupivacaine 0.5 mL.kg(-1) with neostigmine (Groups II-IV) in doses of 2, 3 and 4 microg.kg(-1) respectively. Postoperative pain was assessed for 24 hr using an objective pain score. Blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, total amount of analgesic consumed and adverse effects were also recorded. RESULTS: The duration of postoperative analgesia in Group I (5.1 +/- 2.3 hr) was significantly shorter than in the other three groups (II -16.6 +/- 4.9 hr; III - 17.2 +/- 5.5 hr; IV - 17.0 +/- 5.8 hr; P < 0.05). Total analgesic (paracetamol) consumption was significantly more in Group I (697.6 +/- 240.7 mg) than in the groups receiving caudal neostigmine (II - 248.0 +/- 178.4; III - 270.2 +/- 180.8 and IV -230.6 +/- 166.9 mg; P < 0.05). Groups II, III and IV were comparable with regards to duration of postoperative analgesia and total analgesic consumption (P > 0.05). Incidence of nausea and vomiting were comparable in all four groups. No significant alteration in vital signs or any other adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Caudal neostigmine (2, 3 and 4 microg.kg(-1)) with bupivacaine produces a dose-independent analgesic effect ( approximately 16-17 hr) in children as compared to those receiving caudal bupivacaine alone (approximately five hours) and a reduction in postoperative rescue analgesic consumption without increasing the incidence of adverse effects.     

Comparison of fentanyl-bupivacaine or midazolam-bupivacaine mixtures with plain bupivacaine for caudal anaesthesia in children

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the intensity and effectiveness of 0.75 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.25% with the addition of fentanyl or midazolam for caudal block in children undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy. METHODS: Seventy-five children were allocated randomly to three groups to receive a caudal block with either 0.25% bupivacaine with fentanyl 1 microg.kg(-1) (group BF) or with midazolam 50 microg.kg(-1) (group BM) or bupivacaine alone (group B) after induction of anaesthesia. Haemodynamic parameters, degree of pain, additional analgesic requirements and side-effects were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean systolic arterial pressure at 10, 20, 30 min after caudal block was higher in group B compared with groups BF and BM. Mean intraoperative heart rate was lower in group BF than the other groups. Adequate analgesia was obtained in all patients (100%) in group BF, 23 patients (92%) in group BM and 21 patients (84%) in group B (P > 0.05). The time to recovery to an Aldrete score of 10 was significantly shorter in group B than group BM (P < 0.05). Although not significant, it was also shorter in group B than group BF. There was no difference in additional analgesic requirements between the groups in the first 24 h. Sedation score was higher in the midazolam group at 60 and 90 min postoperatively than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Caudal block with 0.75 ml.kg(-1) 0.25% bupivacaine and 50 microg.kg(-1) midazolam or 1 microg.kg(-1) fentanyl provides no further analgesic advantages to bupivacaine alone when administered immediately after induction of anaesthesia in children undergoing unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy.     

Caudal neostigmine,bupivacaine, and their combination for postoperative pain management after hypospadias surgery in children

In a randomized, double-blinded study, we examined the analgesic efficacy of caudal neostigmine, bupivacaine, or a mixture of both drugs in 60 children. After the induction of general anesthesia, children were allocated randomly into three groups (n = 20) to receive a caudal injection of either 0.25% bupivacaine 1 mL/kg, with or without neostigmine 2 micro g/kg, or neostigmine 2 micro g/kg in normal saline 1 mL/kg. Intraoperatively, children receiving caudal bupivacaine or a bupivacaine/neostigmine mixture maintained hemodynamic stability, required less inhaled anesthetics, and had a shorter recovery time compared with the caudal neostigmine alone. Postoperatively, the caudal bupivacaine/neostigmine mixture resulted in superior analgesia compared with the other two groups. Recovery to first rescue analgesic times were (mean +/- SD) 22.8 +/- 2.9 h, 8.1 +/- 5.9 h, and 5.2 +/- 2.1 h in the bupivacaine/neostigmine, bupivacaine, and neostigmine groups, respectively (P < 0.001). In addition, the bupivacaine and neostigmine groups received more doses of paracetamol than the bupivacaine/neostigmine group to maintain adequate analgesia in the first 24 postoperative h. Postoperative vomiting occurred in 25%, 10%, and 30% in the caudal bupivacaine/neostigmine, bupivacaine, and neostigmine groups, respectively (P < 0.01). We conclude that caudal neostigmine 2 micro g/kg provides postoperative analgesia comparable to caudal bupivacaine in children undergoing hypospadias repair surgery. IMPLICATIONS: Caudal neostigmine 2 micro g/kg provides postoperative analgesia comparable to caudal bupivacaine in children undergoing hypospadias repair surgery. Co-administration of the two drugs is associated with extended postoperative analgesia and reduced need for supplementary analgesics.     

Epidural infusion of clonidine or clonidine plus ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing major abdominal surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the analgesic efficacy and safety of epidural infusion of clonidine in children undergoing major abdominal surgery. DESIGN: Randomized open-label study. SETTING: Postoperative anesthetic unit and pediatric ward of a metropolitan hospital. PATIENTS: Forty children aged 0 to 3 years undergoing major abdominal surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Children were randomly allocated to receive a 24-hour epidural infusion of clonidine 1 microg.mL(-1) at rate of 0.2 mL.kg -1.h -1 preceded by a bolus of 2 microg.kg -1 (CLON group) or a mixture of clonidine 1 microg.mL -1 and ropivacaine 0.1% at rate of 0.2 mL.kg -1.h -1. Both groups received intravenous (IV) ketoprofen 2 mg.kg -1 every 8 hours. Breakthrough pain was treated with IV tramadol 1 mg.kg(-1). MEASUREMENTS: Tramadol requirement, sedation and respiratory and hemodynamic changes were measured. MAIN RESULTS: Approximately 77% and 59.3% of the CLON and CLON+ROPIV groups, respectively, required no tramadol or only one dose over a 24-hour period. Except for those patients who exhibited frequent coughing during the night (4 and 5 patients in the CLON and CLON+ROPIV groups, respectively), no study patients required an analgesic and all had good sleep quality during the first night. Sedation and decreased systolic blood pressure were observed after the clonidine bolus was given. CONCLUSION: For children undergoing major abdominal surgery, the addition of epidural infusion of clonidine or clonidine plus ropivacaine to IV ketoprofen provided good analgesia quality for postoperative rest pain.     

The influence of sufentanil and/or clonidine on the duration of analgesia after a caudal block for hypospadias repair surgery in children

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the addition of clonidine, or sufentanil, or both, to a bupivacaine solution for a caudal block prolonged the period of analgesia after operation in children. Sixty ASA class I or II boys, aged between 8 months and 13 years, admitted for hypospadias repair were enrolled into a prospective randomised study. After induction of general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation the children were allocated into four groups. Group I received 0.5 mL kg(-1) bupivacaine 0.25% caudally, in addition group II received 1 microg kg(-1) clonidine, group III 0.5 microg kg(-1) sufentanil and group IV 0.5 microg kg(-1) clonidine and 0.25 microg kg(-1) sufentanil. The concentrations of clonidine and sufentanil in group IV were halved to reduce possible side-effects with higher dosages. Analgesia and side-effects were assessed 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 h after operation. No significant differences were found among the four groups for the pain scores at 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 h. All groups had a similar frequency of vomiting and a comparable appetite and quality of night rest during the first 24 h following the operation. There was no significant difference in the requirement for additional doses of analgesics. The addition of sufentanil, or clonidine, or both, to bupivacaine for caudal administration provides no additional clinical benefit over bupivacaine alone.     

Comparison of the effects of clonidine and ketamine added to ropivacaine on stress hormone levels and the duration of caudal analgesia

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic quality and duration of ropivacaine 0.2% with the addition of clonidine (1 microg.kg(-1)) with that of ropivacaine 0.2% and the addition of ketamine (0.5 mg.kg(-1)) to that of ropivacaine 0.2% and also compare the postoperative cortisol, insulin and glucose concentrations, sampled after induction and 1 h later following caudal administration in children. METHODS: According to the randomization, patients in the ropivacaine group (R; n = 25) received ropivacaine 0.2%, 0.75 ml.kg(-1); those in the clonidine group (RC; n = 25) received ropivacaine 0.2% 0.75 ml.kg(-1) plus clonidine 1 microg.kg(-1) and those in the ketamine/ropivacaine group (RK; n = 25) ropivacaine 0.2% 0.75 ml.kg(-1) plus ketamine 0.5 mg.kg(-1) (10 mg.ml(-1) concentration). Drugs were diluted in 0.9% saline (0.75 ml.kg(-1)) and prepared by a staff anesthesiologist not otherwise involved in the study. In all groups, the duration of analgesia, analgesic requirements, sedation and insulin, glucose, cortisol concentrations were recorded and statistically compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the three study groups with respect to age, weight or duration of surgery. Caudal administration of clonidine 1 microg.kg(-1) or ketamine 0.5 mg.kg(-1) induced a longer duration of analgesia (P < 0.05) compared with ropivacaine alone. Insulin levels were increased and cortisol reduced in all groups. Glucose concentration was increased in all groups and statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of ketamine and clonidine to ropivacaine 0.2% 0.75 ml.kg(-1), when administered caudally in children, prolongs the duration of postoperative analgesia. The need for subsequent postoperative analgesic is also reduced. Caudal analgesia attenuates or allows partial changes to postoperative cortisol, insulin or blood glucose responses to surgery.     

The comparison of caudal ketamine,alfentanil and ketamine plus alfentanil administration for postoperative analgesia in children

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to compare the effect of single dose caudal ketamine, alfentanil or a mixture of both drugs in the treatment of pain after hypospadias repair surgery in children. METHODS: The group comprised 109 boys, ASA I-II, aged 1-9 years, who were undergoing hypospadias repair surgery as day cases. The children were randomly divided into three groups for postoperative analgesia: group 1, only alfentanil (20 microg x kg(-10) was given caudally; group 2, ketamine (0.5 mg x kg(-1)) alone; and group 3, alfentanil (20 microg x kg(-1))-ketamine (0.5 mg x kg(-1)) was given caudally. The analgesic effect of caudal block was evaluated using the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and sedation was assessed using a five-point sedation score. The first analgesic requirement time and the number of supplementary analgesics required by each child in a 24-h period were also recorded. RESULTS: No statistical differences were found in demographic characteristics, haemodynamic and respiratory parameters, objective pain scores, postoperative sedation scores and duration of surgery among the groups. The median time to first analgesia was significantly shorter in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3 (P=0.009, P=0.001). Significantly more patients in group 1 required additional postoperative analgesia (paracetamol 15 mg x kg(-1)) compared with groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Caudal administration of ketamine 0.5 mg.kg-1 with or without alfentanil in children produced satisfactory postoperative analgesia without respiratory depression or other side-effects.     

Postoperative analgesia for outpatient arthroscopic knee surgery with intraarticular clonidine and/or morphine

Both clonidine, an alpha(2) agonist, and morphine, an opioid agonist, provide enhanced patient analgesia after arthroscopic knee surgery when administered via the intraarticular (IA) route. Clonidine potentiates morphine analgesia in the animal model. We designed this study to determine whether clonidine or morphine results in better analgesia and whether their combination would provide superior analgesia to either drug alone. We evaluated 60 patients undergoing arthroscopic knee meniscus repair under local anesthesia with sedation. After surgery, patients were randomized into four IA groups: Group B received 30 mL 0.25% bupivacaine; Group BC received 30 mL 0.25% bupivacaine and clonidine 1 microg/kg; Group BM received 30 mL 0.25% bupivacaine and morphine 3 mg; and Group BCM received 30 mL 0.25% bupivacaine, clonidine 1 microg/kg, and morphine 3 mg. This study revealed a significant benefit from the individual IA administration of both clonidine and morphine. The combination of these drugs resulted in decreased postoperative pain and analgesic use, as well as an increased analgesic duration compared with either drug alone. We conclude that IA clonidine and morphine improved comfort compared with either drug alone in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy.     

Analgesic efficacy and safety of a caudal bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture in children

The analgesic efficacy and safety of a single caudal injection of a bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture was investigated in this prospective, controlled, triple-blinded study of 34 children, aged 1-11 yr and of ASA physical status I-II undergoing urological surgery. After induction of anaesthesia and before surgery, the children were randomly assigned to receive a caudal injection of 1.0 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.125% with epinephrine 1:400,000 and either fentanyl 1.0 microgram.kg-1 in 1.0 ml of normal saline or 1.0 ml of normal saline. After completion of surgery, patients were assessed in the recovery room for six hours from the time of the caudal injection and for a further 18 hr on the ward. While in the recovery room arterial oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were monitored continuously and recorded hourly together with end-tidal carbon dioxide, pain and sedation scores. Other complications were also recorded. While on the ward, pain and sedation scores, respiratory rate and side effects were recorded every two hours. Postoperative analgesia was provided by intravenous morphine. Analgesic requirements were recorded for the 24-hr study period. Pain and sedation scores did not differ between groups. Respiratory depression or hypoxia did not occur. The incidences of other side effects did not differ. There were no differences in the numbers of patients requiring morphine within eight hours, the time to first morphine administration or the total morphine requirements. We conclude that a single caudal injection of a bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture with epinephrine administered prior to surgery, while safe, offers no advantage over an injection of bupivacaine 0.125% with epinephrine for paediatric urological surgery.     

Caudal 0.2% ropivacaine is less effective during surgery than 0.2% levobupivacaine and 0.2% bupivacaine: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that without the analgesic effects of volatile anesthetics, caudal 0.20% ropivacaine would be less effective during surgical stimulation than 0.20% bupivacaine or 0.20% levobupivacaine. This trial was designed to examine whether the combination of a caudal block with 0.20% ropivacaine and i.v. anesthesia resulted in reduced analgesic efficacy during surgery compared with caudal 0.20% levobupivacaine or 0.20% bupivacaine in children. METHODS: Ninety ASA I-II children between 1 and 7 years old, scheduled for inguinal hernia repair or orchidopexy under propofol anesthesia were randomized to receive a caudal block with 1 ml x kg(-1) of 0.2% bupivacaine, 0.2% ropivacaine or 0.2% levobupivacaine. The primary outcome measure of the study was the clinical efficacy of the caudal block during surgery. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative pain relief and residual motor blockade. RESULTS: Four children were excluded and 86 were analyzed. The proportion of children with effective caudal block during surgery was significantly higher in children receiving levobupivacaine (26/28) or bupivacaine (27/29) compared with patients receiving ropivacaine (21/29) (P = 0.03). There were no significant differences among groups in the analgesic onset time (P = 0.1), incidence of residual motor blockade (P = 0.4), number of patients requiring analgesia after operation or in the time from caudal injection to the first administration of analgesic medication (P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Combined with propofol anesthesia, 0.2% levobupivacaine and 0.2% bupivacaine are more effective than 0.2% ropivacaine for caudal use in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair or orchidopexy.     

Diclofenac and flurbiprofen with or without clonidine for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing elective ophthalmological surgery

We conducted a prospective, randomized study to compare the efficacy of preoperative diclofenac, flurbiprofen, and clonidine, given alone, as well as the combination of diclofenac and clonidine, and flurbiprofen and clonidine in controlling postoperative pain in 125 children. The patients (ASA I, 2-12 years) undergoing elective ophthalmological surgery were allocated to one of five groups: rectal diclofenac 2 mg.kg(-1) following oral placebo premedication, i. v. flurbiprofen 1 mg.kg(-1) following placebo premedication, oral clonidine premedication, rectal diclofenac 2 mg.kg(-1) following clonidine, and i.v. flurbiprofen 1 mg.kg(-1) following clonidine. The children received clonidine (4 microg.kg(-1)) or placebo 105 min before anaesthesia. Diclofenac or flurbiprofen was given immediately after induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen. Postoperative pain was assessed by a blinded observer using a modified objective pain scale (OPS). No opioids were administered throughout the study. Rectal diclofenac 2 mg.kg(-1) i.v. flurbiprofen 1 mg.kg(-1), oral clonidine 4 microg.kg(-1) provided similar OPS scores and requirement for supplementary analgesics during 12 h after surgery. Combination of oral clonidine and one of these nonsteroidal analgesics minimized postoperative pain. Our findings suggest that this combined regimen may be a promising prophylactic approach to postoperative pain control in children undergoing ophthalmological surgery.     

Caudal neostigmine for postoperative analgesia in paediatric surgery

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate analgesia and side-effects of caudal neostigmine coadministered with bupivacaine in paediatric surgery. METHODS: We studied children, aged 1-5 years, undergoing elective surgery (inguinal hernia and hypospadias). After standard induction of anaesthesia, caudal anaesthesia was performed. Group 1 received 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5 ml.kg-1 and Group 2 received 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5 ml x kg-1 with 1 microg x kg-1 neostigmine via the caudal route. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation were recorded before induction, after induction but before caudal anaesthesia, and then every 5 min after caudal anaesthesia. Haemodynamic, Toddler, Preschooler, Postoperative Pain Scale (TPPPS) pain score and sedation score values were recorded 30 min after extubation and at hours 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24. A pain score >3/10 resulted in administration of rectal paracetamol. The duration of postoperative analgesia was defined as the time between caudal drug injection and the first rectal paracetamol administration. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in demographic and haemodynamic date, duration of surgery and anaesthesia, time to extubation or sedation scores. The duration of postoperative pain relief did not differ between the two groups; 15.40 +/- 10.97 h for group 1 vs. 15.45 +/- 10.99 h for group 2 (P > 0.05). The incidence of nausea (three patients in group 2 and one patient in group 1) was not statistically significant. No other side-effects were seen. CONCLUSIONS: We found that a single caudal injection of 1 microg x kg-1 neostigmine mixed with bupivacaine offers no significant advantage over bupivacaine alone for postoperative pain relief in children undergoing genitourinary surgery.     

Clonidine added to bupivacaine enhances and prolongs analgesia after brachial plexus block via a local mechanism in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The addition of clonidine to local anaesthetics enhances pain relief after peripheral nerve block, but the site of action is unproven. METHODS: Seven healthy volunteers underwent three brachial block procedures using bupivacaine 0.25% 1 mg kg(-1) + epinephrine 1:200,000 (=local analgesic) in a randomized, double-blind cross-over fashion: (a) control treatment: local analgesic with 0.9% sodium chloride solution for the block and an intramuscular injection of saline; (b) intramuscular treatment: local analgesic with 0.9% NaCl for block and an intramuscular injection of clonidine 2 microg kg(-1) and (c) block treatment: local analgesic with clonidine 2 microg kg(-1) for block and an intramuscular injection of saline. RESULTS: The onset and duration of complete blockade (sensory/motor/temperature) was evaluated in the four nerve regions of the hand and forearm. Additionally, sedation score, blood pressure, heart rate and plasma clonidine concentrations were determined. The median duration of complete sensory blockade was 270 min (range 0-600) for block treatment compared to 0 min (range 0-480) for intramuscular treatment (P < 0.05) and 0 min (range 0-180) for control treatment (P < 0.05). Motor and temperature blockade exhibited similar results. Administration of clonidine was associated with sedation and a decrease in heart rate and blood pressure independent of the route of administration. Plasma clonidine concentrations were lower for block compared to the intramuscular treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The admixture of clonidine to bupivacaine plus epinephrine prolongs and enhances brachial plexus blockade. Lower clonidine plasma concentrations for block treatment strongly suggest a local effect.