Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective,randomized study

BACKGROUND: Anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty is a common complaint and typically is attributed to the patellofemoral joint. The purpose of the present study was to compare the outcome of resurfacing and nonresurfacing of the patella, particularly with regard to anterior knee pain, and to clarify the indications for patellar resurfacing at the time of total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized study of 514 consecutive primary press-fit condylar total knee replacements. The patients were randomized to either resurfacing or retention of the patella. They were also randomized to either a cruciate-substituting or a cruciate-retaining prosthesis as part of a separate trial. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.3 years (range, two to 8.5 years), and the patients were assessed with use of the Knee Society rating, a clinical anterior knee pain score, and the British Orthopaedic Association patient-satisfaction score. The assessment was performed without the examiner knowing whether the patella had been resurfaced. At the time of follow-up, there were 474 knees. Thirty-five patients who had a bilateral knee replacement underwent resurfacing on one side only. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of anterior knee pain was 25.1% (fifty-eight of 231 knees) in the nonresurfacing group, compared with 5.3% (thirteen of 243 knees) in the resurfacing group (p < 0.0001). There was one case of component loosening. Ten of eleven patients who underwent secondary resurfacing had complete relief of anterior knee pain. The overall postoperative knee scores were lower in the nonresurfacing group, and the difference was significant among patients with osteoarthritis (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the resurfacing and nonresurfacing groups with regard to the postoperative function score. Patients who had a bilateral knee replacement were more likely to prefer the resurfaced side. CONCLUSIONS: As the present study showed a significantly higher rate of anterior knee pain following arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing, we recommend patellar resurfacing at the time of total knee replacement when technically possible.     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Routine patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty has been debated for decades. The early total knee designs and surgical techniques lead to a high complication rate following patellar resurfacing. This lead to many surgeons abandoning this practice and either leaving the patella unresurfaced routinely or selectively resurfacing. Modern day randomized control trials and meta-analyses of these trials reveal a higher incidience of anterior knee pain and a resultant higher reoperation rate in nonresurfaced patellae. We argue that with modern day designs and surgical techniques, there is a low complication rate to resurfacing and little downside to resurfacing.     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Whether or not to resurface the patella when performing a primary total knee arthroplasty remains an open question. A number of recent studies have added new information relevant to this controversy. Anatomic studies show that there is normally substantial variability in the anatomy of the trochlear groove. Implanting a femoral component therefore results in a change in the surface topography of the knee in a high percentage of cases. Even though a number of intraoperative techniques have been described in an attempt to accurately reproduce femoral and tibial component rotation, studies of the application of these techniques reveal that component malpositioning or malrotation of a measurable degree occurs in 10% to 30% of cases, depending on the surgical technique and landmarks used. There has been substantial change in the design of both femoral and patellar components in recent years. Even with current designs, biomechanical studies indicate that some degree of change in kinematics and contact stresses occurs following total knee arthroplasty. However, the results of clinical studies have been extremely variable, with most showing either no difference or very little difference between resurfaced and nonresurfaced patellae in osteoarthritic knees. The decision to resurface the patella or not must be individualized on the basis of the surgeon's training and experience and an intraoperative assessment of the patellofemoral articulation.     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Technical errors in patellar resurfacing at the time of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are responsible for many of the complications that affect the patellofemoral joint. Instability, patellar fracture, and wear of metal-backed patellar implants are significantly affected by errors of patellar resurfacing. A review of 50 TKAs using a condylar prosthesis and a standardized technique for patellar resurfacing was performed to evaluate the accuracy of the technique. The patients were evaluated at a mean of 2.5 years (range, two to five years) after surgery. The Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score improved from a preoperative mean of 56 to 92 at the last evaluation. The Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Scores were excellent in 92% and good in 8%. The Knee Society Knee Score improved from a preoperative mean of 28 for pain and 49 for function to a last evaluation mean of 96 for pain and 85 for function. None of the patients had symptoms referable to the patellofemoral joint. There were no patellar fractures, dislocations, or instances of implant loosening of the patella. Roentgenograms revealed nine asymmetrically resurfaced patellae and five tilted patellae. There were no patellar subluxations. Patellar thickness was maintained at the preoperative level of 21 mm. Joint-line height was elevated 1 mm. The patellar height was decreased 2 mm from the preoperative height. Using a standard technique, satisfactory clinical results can be achieved, but minor errors in resurfacing and alignment will still occur.     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: a ten-year randomised prospective trial

A series of 100 consecutive osteoarthritic patients was randomised to undergo total knee replacement using a Miller-Galante II prosthesis, with or without a cemented polyethylene patellar component. Knee function was evaluated using the American Knee Society score, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis index, specific patellofemoral-related questions and radiographic evaluation until the fourth post-operative year, then via questionnaire until ten years post-operatively. A ten-point difference in the American Knee Society score between the two groups was considered a significant change in knee performance, with alpha and beta levels of 0.05. The mean age of the patients in the resurfaced group was 71 years (53 to 88) and in the non-resurfaced group was 73 years (54 to 86). After ten years 22 patients had died, seven were suffering from dementia, three declined further participation and ten were lost to follow-up. Two patients in the non-resurfaced group subsequently had their patellae resurfaced. In the resurfaced group one patient had an arthroscopic lateral release. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups: both had a similar deterioration of scores with time, and no further patellofemoral complications were observed in either group. We are unable to recommend routine patellar resurfacing in osteoarthritic patients undergoing total knee replacement on the basis of our findings.     

Patellar resurfacing complications in total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

The ideal management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still controversial. Patellar retention is generally associated with an increased rate of anterior knee pain; however, patient satisfaction is similar in cases of replacement or retention. When the patella is replaced, potential severe complications can occur. Aim of this study was to retrospectively review results of a continuous series of patients having been treated with TKA and patella resurfacing.

Methods

The charts of 1,600 consecutive total knee prostheses were analysed to evaluate the rate of patellar resurfacing. All implants were posterior stabilized; 310 patients having received a patellar replacement were reviewed at follow-up (FU) examination. Complete physical examination as well as administration of the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score was performed. X-rays analysis included weightbearing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views of the injured knee and bilateral skyline views at 30° flexion.

Results

Two hundred and eighty patients were available for clinical and imaging investigation at an average FU of 96 (58–144) months. Mean age at the time of surgery was 70 (62–80) years. Mean HSS score was 85.9 ± 7.6. The overall rate of patellofemoral complications was 7 % (19 cases); 13 patients claimed anterior knee pain, five had symptomatic patellar maltracking and one had patellar component loosening.

Conclusion

Our data are in accordance with those available in the literature. Recent meta-analyses demonstrated lower risk of re-operation after patellar resurfacing. However, when complications of the resurfaced patella occur, they can be potentially catastrophic events.     

Patellar resurfacing versus no resurfacing in Scorpio total knee arthroplasty

This retrospective study compared the results of patellar resurfacing versus no resurfacing in 121 patients (142 knees) who underwent Scorpio total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between January 2002 and September 2004. Mean follow-up was 33 months in the nonresurfaced group and 18 months in the resurfaced group. The 2 groups were similar in age and gender. The incidence of anterior knee pain was 25% in the nonresurfaced group compared to 7% in the resurfaced group (P = 0.05), and the rate of revision was 10% in the nonresurfaced group compared to zero in the resurfaced group (P = 0.013). Mean Euroquol score was 91 in the nonresurfaced group compared to 95 in the resurfaced group (P = 0.26). Euroquol score, Knee Society score, knee instability, return to preoperative functional level, ability to kneel, use of a walking aid, and presence of limp were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The results of this study suggest a more consistent outcome can be achieved with patellar resurfacing in TKA with the Scorpio prosthesis.     

髌骨置换与否对全膝关节置换术疗效影响的Meta分析

[目的]系统评价髌骨置换与不置换髌骨的全膝关节置换术的术后疗效.[方法]收集1966～2010发表的所有比较髌骨置换与不置换髌骨伞膝关节置换后疗效的随机对照试验,对其逐个进行质量评价,提取关于置换后再手术率、前膝痛发生率、患者满意率及各种评分系统测评的膝关节评分的改善,并作系统评价.[结果]11个随机对照试验共纳入1 473例膝,置换髌骨与未置换组的再次手术率差异有显著性意义(相对危险度=0.54,95%可信区间为0.35～0.84);未置换髌骨组再次接受手术的概率比较大.置换髌骨与未置换组的置换后前膝疼痛发生率差异有显著性意义(相对危险度=0.53,95%可信区间为0.39～0.71).置换髌骨与未置换组的术后患者满意率差异无显著性意义(相对危险度=1.14,95%可信区间为0.74～1.76).置换髌骨与未置换组的术后KSS评分差异无显著性意义(加权均数差=1.15,95%可信区间为-0.23～2.53).[结论]置换髌骨的全膝关节置换术中,远期随访再手术率、置换后前膝痛发生率低于未置换髌骨组,患者满意率及置换后膝关节KSS评分方面,两种髌骨处理方式无显著性差异.由于纳入文献质量差异较大,对此结论的解释应保持谨慎.     

全膝关节置换术中髌骨面修整与髌骨置换的比较研究

目的比较全膝关节置换术髌骨面修整和髌骨置换的临床结果。方法2002年1月至12月对60例（60膝）行初次全膝关节置换术的骨性关节炎患者进行前瞻性、随机化研究。所有患者接受相同的后交叉韧带替代型全膝关节假体（PFC）,患者随机行髌骨面修整（髌骨面修整组）或髌骨置换（髌骨置换组）。58例患者平均随访54个月（40～60个月）,对其进行临床评价,包括膝关节协会评分（KSS）、膝关节活动度（ROM）、患者满意度和X线检查。结果两组患者KSS总评分（P=0．12）、KSS疼痛评分（P=0．90）、患者满意度（P=0．22）无明显差异;两组术后膝前痛的发生率均为10％亦无明显差异。两组ROM（P=0．028）和KSS功能评分（P=0．0098）差异有统计学意义。结论全膝关节置换术不论是髌骨面修整还是髌骨置换均能明显减轻疼痛和改善功能。术后膝前痛可能与假体设计和手术技术有关,并非与是否置换髌骨有关。     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Patellar resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of this technique through an evaluation of the current literature. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing total knee arthroplasties performed with and without patellar resurfacing. Outcomes of interest included the number of reoperations, the prevalence of postoperative anterior knee pain, and the improvement in various knee scores. RESULTS: Ten trials assessing 1223 knees were eligible. The absolute risk of reoperation was reduced by 4.6% (95% confidence interval, 1.9% to 7.3%) in the patellar resurfacing arm (between-study heterogeneity, p < 0.01; I(2) = 60%), implying that one would have to resurface twenty-two patellae (95% confidence interval, fourteen to fifty-two patellae) in order to prevent one reoperation. Patellar resurfacing reduced the absolute risk of postoperative anterior knee pain by 13.8% (95% confidence interval, 6.4% to 21.2%), implying that one would have to resurface seven patellae (95% confidence interval, five to sixteen patellae) in order to prevent one case of postoperative anterior knee pain. Only four trials provided adequate data for a quantitative synthesis of the changes in the various knee scores; on the basis of those four trials, there was no difference in the mean improvement in the knee scores (standardized mean difference, 0.03; 95% confidence interval, -0.50 to 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence indicates that patellar resurfacing reduces the risks of reoperation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. The observed effects are clinically important despite their modest magnitude. Additional, carefully designed randomized trials are required to strengthen this claim.     

Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that a less invasive (LIS) surgical technique using a navigation system would promote rapid recovery and improve alignment compared with conventional technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study compared 49 navigation-assisted LIS TKAs with 53 conventionally performed TKAs using a medial parapatellar arthrotomy with patellar eversion. Navigation-assisted LIS TKA used a shorter skin incision, a midvastus approach without patella eversion, and a navigation system. Navigation-assisted LIS TKA had better pain scores, shorter times to achieve 90 degrees flexion and straight leg raise, and a smaller extension lag during the very early postoperative period. However, there were no differences between the groups 2 weeks postoperatively. There were no differences in mean prosthetic alignment between the 2 groups, but the navigation-assisted LIS group had fewer "outliers" than the conventionally performed TKA group.     

膝关节骨关节炎患者初次全膝关节置换术中选择髌骨置换的Meta分析

目的探讨膝关节骨关节炎(OA)进行初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)中选择髌骨置换与否的疗效,评价两种不同治疗选择的差异。方法检索Medline、Embase、Cochranelibrary、CBM,收集膝关节OA行初次TKA术中髌骨置换与否的临床对照试验,提取数据分析,采用RevMan5.0.18进行Meta分析。结果纳入8个前瞻性随机对照试验,共822例手术,其中髌骨置换组373例,髌骨非置换组444例。髌骨置换与非置换组比较,前膝痛与KSS评分均无明显的统计学意义(P0.5),置换组的因髌股关节问题而再次手术率低于非置换组[RR=0.53,95%CI(0.29,0.96),P=0.04],但置换组再次手术的原因除了常见的前膝痛,还包括髌骨假体相关的并发症。结论膝关节OA的患者行初次TKA术中选择髌骨置换与否的前膝痛与KSS评分无明显的统计学意义,置换组的因髌股关节问题再次手术率低于非置换组,但置换组再次手术的复杂性大于非置换组。     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow-up

BACKGROUND: Whether to resurface the patella during a primary total knee arthroplasty performed for the treatment of degenerative osteoarthritis remains a controversial issue. Parameters that have been suggested as being useful in guiding this decision include patient height and weight, the presence of anterior knee pain preoperatively, and the grade of chondromalacia encountered intraoperatively. The purpose of this study was to determine whether these parameters were predictive of the clinical result following total knee arthroplasty with or without patellar resurfacing. METHODS: Eighty-six patients (118 knees) undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of osteoarthritis were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. All patients received the same posterior-cruciate-sparing total knee prosthetic components. Patients were randomized to treatment with or without resurfacing of the patella. Evaluations consisted of the determination of a Knee Society clinical score, the completion of a patient satisfaction questionnaire, specific questions relating to patellofemoral symptoms, and radiographs. Sixty-seven patients (ninety-three knees) were followed for a minimum of five years (range, sixty to eighty-four months; average, 70.5 months). RESULTS: With the numbers available, there was no significant difference between the groups treated with and without resurfacing with regard to the overall Knee Society score or the pain and function subscores. Obesity, the degree of patellar chondromalacia, and the presence of preoperative anterior knee pain did not predict postoperative clinical scores or the presence of postoperative anterior knee pain. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of anterior knee pain could not be predicted with any clinical or radiographic parameter studied. On the basis of these results, it seems likely that postoperative anterior knee pain is related either to the component design or to the details of the surgical technique, such as component rotation, rather than to whether or not the patella is resurfaced.     

Patellar clunk syndrome in total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing

In a series of 647 total knee arthroplasties, the patella was not resurfaced if bony geometry of the patella was good enough to maintain good congruency of the patella undersurface to the femoral component and the patella was tracking normally at the femoral component groove at the time of surgery. Three hundred seventy-two total knee arthroplasties were done with a femoral component that had the same geometry as the original total condylar prosthesis. None of these knees resulted in patellar catching, whether the patella was resurfaced or not. Two hundred seventy-five total knee arthroplasties were done with a more contemporary femoral component with wider intercondylar space and shorter posterior extension of the intercondylar notch. Eleven of these 275 knees demonstrated catching of the patella at 60° to 90° of flexion when the knee was tested from flexion to extension during the surgery. All of these 11 knees did not have patellar resurfacing during surgery at first. Of these 11 knees with patellar catching noted during surgery, at first, patellar catching was eliminated with patellar resurfacing in 4 and by shaving of the superior pole of the patella in 7. None of the knees with the patella resurfacing in this series showed patellar catching.     

Cryotherapy temperature differences after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial

In spite of its widespread use after orthopaedic procedures, the literature evaluating the clinical efficacy of cryotherapy is controversial. The purpose of this prospective randomized trial was to compare two different temperatures for administering cryotherapy after total knee arthroplasty with regards to short-term postoperative outcomes. Sixty-four subjects were assigned either the 45 degrees F group or the 75 degrees F group. Subjects in the 45 degrees group were as likely to report a lower pain score at the time of follow-up compared to the 75 degrees group. Our results demonstrate no additional analgesic effect associated with the lower temperature of cryotherapy. Postoperative narcotic consumption, postoperative drainage, self-reported knee function, and range of motion were not affected by the different cryotherapy temperatures. No adverse effects were reported with the cryotherapy treatment.     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty leads to better isokinetic performance

BackgroundFor decades there have been concerns about patellar resurfacing (PR) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the individual preference of the surgeon is still the main determinant of whether or not resurfacing is applied. According to preference, surgeons can be categorized in 3 main groups of those who usually, selectively, or rarely resurface. The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled study was to compare the isokinetic performance and clinical outcome of TKAs with PR and without PR.MethodsA total of 50 patients scheduled to undergo TKA for primary osteoarthritis of the knee were randomly assigned to either the PR or non-PR groups. There were no significant differences between the groups in respect of age, BMI, gender and preoperative Knee Society Score (KSS) and isokinetic performance. Patients were evaluated at postoperative 3, 6, and 12 months with KSS and at 6 months and 1 year with isokinetic measurements.ResultsThe PR group had a higher mean score, especially in the functional component of KSS, but the difference was not statistically significant. Knee extension peak torque was significantly higher in the PR group at 6 months (p = 0.029) and 1 year (p = 0.004) postoperatively. There were no significant differences between the groups in respect of knee flexion peak torque values following TKA.ConclusionsThe results of this study demonstrated that PR during TKA is associated with better isokinetic performance and higher knee scores. These results support routine/usually resurfacing of the patella. For surgeons who selectively resurface the patella, the advantage of better isokinetic performance may be taking into consideration in favor of resurfacing the patella where they are undecided.Level of evidenceLevel I, therapeutic study.     

Patellar resurfacing in total condylar knee arthroplasty. Technique and results

One hundred thirty-two total condylar knee arthroplasties with a 3-8-year follow-up period were studied prospectively with particular reference to the patellofemoral joint. All patients had significant patellofemoral disease and underwent primary patellar resurfacing. After operation 96% of patients had little or no pain and 98% had functional improvement. There were seven (5%) complications related to the patellofemoral joint. The importance of careful attention to preparation of the patella, the technique of prosthetic implantation and correct patellar tracking were emphasized. Routine patellar resurfacing proved highly successful with minimal complications.