Comparison of Bone Mineral Density of the Phalanges, Lumbar Spine, Hip, and Forearm for Assessment of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women

The objective of this study was to compare peripheral bone mineral density (BMD) of the phalanges with BMD of the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and forearm and to determine the clinical value of measuring a single peripheral site (phalanges) in identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. BMD was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry using the accuDEXA((R)) (ADXA-finger) (Schick, New York, NY) and the QDR-4500 (DXA-lumbar spine, hip, forearm) (Hologic, Waltham, MA). Correlation coefficients between ADXA and DXA of the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck and one third radial site ranged from 0.53 to 0.73. The sensitivity of an ADXA T-score of -2.5 in identifying patients with a DXA T-score of < or = -2.5 at the femoral neck was 35%. An ADXA T-score cut point of -1.0 improved the sensitivity of ADXA in identifying patients with a femoral neck T-score of < or = -2.5 (85%), but the specificity declined from 88 to 49%. There was substantial discordance in the diagnosis of osteoporosis when a single site was measured, regardless of technique. Within the limitations of single-site measurements, BMD measured by ADXA has adequate sensitivity to identify women with low BMD at the femoral neck, if an appropriate T-score criterion is used.     

Utility of Spine Bone Mineral Density in Fracture Prediction Within FRAX

Predicting individuals at risk for fracturing and modifying that risk are important in preventative health. Our aim was to quantify the impact of spine bone mineral density (BMD) on fracture risk prediction and determine the positive predictive value of fracture prediction using the lowest BMD value at the femoral neck, total hip, or lumbar spine. A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 15,033 women was performed, assessing the contribution of age, body mass index, number of clinical risk factors, T-score, and osteoporosis category to the presence of fracture. In patients whose lumbar spine T-scores are 1 or 2 osteoporosis categories lower than femoral neck, there is an approximately 30% increased risk of fracture compared with the femoral neck alone. For patients younger than 60 yr, the odds ratio of having a fracture based on the presence of lumbar spine osteoporosis was greater than that based on femoral neck osteoporosis. Osteoporosis at the total hip correlated best with the presence of fracture. When using FRAX, we recommend that the 10-yr fracture prediction be adjusted when lumbar spine T-score is 1–2 osteoporosis categories lower than the femoral neck T-score or when lumbar spine T-score is ≥1 standard deviation less than femoral neck T-score.     

Bone mass continues to increase at the hip after parathyroid hormone treatment is discontinued in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is the most common secondary cause of osteoporosis. In this 24-month study, we report changes in bone turnover and bone mass after 12 months of daily injections of human parathyroid hormone 1-34 [hPTH(1-34)] and 12 months off treatment in postmenopausal women (mean age, 63 years) with osteoporosis treated with glucocorticoid and hormone replacement therapy. Response to the treatment was assessed with bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the lumbar spine by quantitative computed tomography (QCT); BMD measurements of the lumbar spine, hip, and forearm by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); and biochemical markers of bone turnover. The mean (+/-SEM) change in BMD of the lumbar spine by QCT and DXA in the PTH group at 24 months was 45.9+/-6.4% and 12.6+/-2.2% (p < 0.001). The change in total hip and femoral neck BMD was not significant at 12 months but increased to 4.7+/-0.9% (p < 0.01) and 5.2+/-1.3% at 24 months, respectively, as compared with a relatively small change of 1.3+/-0.9% and 2.6+/-1.7% in the estrogen-only group. The mean percent differences in BMD of the lumbar spine by QCT and DXA between the groups at 24 months were 43.1% and 11.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean percent differences over the estrogen-only group in hip BMD were 3.4% for total hip (p < 0.01) and 2.6% for femoral neck at 24 months. Biochemical markers of bone turnover increased to more than 150% during the first 6 months of therapy, remained elevated throughout the 12-month treatment period, and returned to baseline values within 6 months of discontinuing the PTH treatment. These results suggest that PTH dramatically increases bone mass in the lumbar spine and hip in postmenopausal women with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis who are taking hormone replacement therapy. However, the maximum effect of this anabolic agent on bone mass at the hip after 12 months of treatment requires at least 6-12 months after the PTH treatment is discontinued.     

Ability of Peripheral DXA Measurements of the Forearm to Predict Low Axial Bone Mineral Density at Menopause

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (pDXA) measurement of the forearm to predict low axial bone mineral density (BMD) as defined according to the WHO classification. Two hundred and thirty-four healthy women aged 45-60 years were investigated. BMD was measured at the proximal and distal radius + ulna by pDXA and at the lumbar spine and femoral neck by DXA. There was a significant but moderate correlation between peripheral and axial BMD measurements, with r values ranging from 0.4 to 0.6 (SEE: 13.5-17%). The cutoff values for the proximal and distal radius BMD that allow the identification with 95% sensitivity of postmenopausal women with either a lumbar spine or femoral neck T-score < -1, corresponded to a T-score of +0.5 (proximal radius) and +1 (distal radius). More than 90% of the whole population had a peripheral T-score below these thresholds. Using an axial T-score < or = -2.5 as the definition of abnormality reduced to 48% (proximal radius) to 66% (distal radius) the number of women who would have required DXA axial measurements (i.e., with a pDXA T-score below the cutoff value of -0.7). Of the 33 women (14%) with a proximal radius T-score < or = -2.5 (osteoporosis), only 1 had a lumbar spine and femoral neck T-score > or = -1 (normal). Conversely, of the 50% (proximal radius) to 65% (distal radius) of the women with normal forearm measurement, 5% (proximal radius) to 9% (distal radius) were found to be osteoporotic and an additional 57% (proximal radius) to 59% (distal radius) could be classified as osteopenic (T-score between -1 and -2.5) at either the lumbar spine or femoral neck. In conclusion, use of pDXA forearm measurement as a prescreening tool in early postmenopausal women should allow the direct identification of about 50% of the women with no axial osteoporosis. However, this study highlights the difficulties in using a unique T-score that could be applied to different sites to diagnose osteoporosis.     

Differences in Site-Specific Fracture Risk Among Older Women with Discordant Results for Osteoporosis at Hip and Spine: Study of Osteoporotic Fractures

To examine the fracture pattern in older women whose bone mineral density (BMD) T-score criteria for osteoporosis at hip and spine disagree, hip and spine BMD were measured in Study of Osteoporotic Fractures participants using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Hip osteoporosis was defined as T-score ≤−2.5 at femoral neck or total hip, and spine osteoporosis as T-score ≤−2.5 at lumbar spine. Incident clinical fractures were self-reported and centrally adjudicated. Incident radiographic spine fractures were defined morphometrically. Compared to women with osteoporosis at neither hip nor spine, those osteoporotic only at hip had a 3.0-fold age- and weight-adjusted increased risk for hip fracture (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4–3.6), and smaller increases in risk of nonhip nonspine (hazard ratios [HR] = 1.6), clinical spine (odds ratio [OR] = 2.2), and radiographic spine fractures (OR = 1.5). Women osteoporotic only at spine had a 2.8-fold increased odds of radiographic spine fracture (95% CI: 2.1–3.8), and smaller increases in risk of clinical spine (OR = 1.4), nonhip nonspine (HR = 1.6), and hip fractures (HR = 1.2). Discordant BMD results predict different fracture patterns. DXA fracture risk estimation in these patients should be site specific. Women osteoporotic only at spine would not have been identified from hip BMD measurement alone, and may have a sufficiently high fracture risk to warrant preventive treatment.     

Effect of precision error on T-scores and the diagnostic classification of bone status.

We quantified confidence intervals (CIs) for T-scores for the lumbar spine and hip and determined the practical effect (impact on diagnosis) of variability around the T-score cutpoint of -2.5. Using precision data from the literature for GE Lunar Prodigy dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) systems, the 95% CI for the T-score was +/-0.23 at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), +/- 0.20 at the total hip, and +/-0.41 at the femoral neck. Thus, T-score variations of +/-0.23 or less at the spine, +/-0.20 at the total hip, and +/-0.41 at the femoral neck are not statistically significant. When diagnosing osteoporosis, T-scores in the interval -2.3 to -2.7 for spine or total hip (after rounding to conform to guidelines from the International Society for Clinical Densitometry) and -2.1 to -2.9 for femoral neck are not statistically different from -2.5. Better precision values resulted in smaller 95% CIs. This concept was applied to actual clinical data using Hologic DXA systems. The study cohort comprised 2388 white women with either normal or osteopenic spines in whom the densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis would be determined by hip T-scores. When evaluating actual patient T-scores in the range -2.5+/-95% CI, we found that the diagnosis was indeterminate in approximately 12% of women when T-scores for femoral neck were used and in 4% of women when T-scores for total hip were used, with uncertainty as to whether the classification was osteopenia or osteoporosis. We conclude that precision influences the variability around T-scores and that this variability affects the reliability of diagnostic classification.     

Utility of heel ultrasound bone density in men.

In women, heel ultrasound (US) bone mineral density (BMD) has been shown to predict fracture risk, but the usefulness of this screening tool in men is not known. We measured the heel quantitative ultrasound index (QUI( in a convenience sample 185 of men (136 Caucasian, 1 Asian, and 48 African-American) with an average age of 63 yr (range of 25-85) undergoing BMD of the spine and hip by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to determine whether the heel measurement could predict central BMD. The average DXA T-score was -0.97, -1.20, and -1.61 for the spine, total hip, and femoral neck, respectively. The mean heel US BMD T-score (using the only available T-score, which was defined for Caucasian postmenopausal women) was -0.92. There were significant correlations among the various DXA measurements and the heel US BMD T-score (r = 0.373-0.483, p < 0.001). We defined arbitrarily osteopenia as a spine, total hip, or femoral neck T-score by DXA of < -1.5. We also made two different arbitrary definitions of osteoporosis by DXA: < -2.0 and < -2.5. Using these numbers as disease definitions, we determined the specificity, sensitivity, as well as positive and negative predictive values of using the heel US T-score to predict osteopenia or osteoporosis. Using various cutoffs for the heel T-score, we found that increasing the cutoff toward 0 increased the sensitivity but lowered the specificity. No cutoff was found that provided both good sensitivity and specificity. By analyzing the men by ethnic and age groups, we found that the best set of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was derived from data using heel US to predict osteopenia and osteoporosis in men younger than age 65, although the areas under the ROC curve were approx 0.8. In conclusion, despite a strong correlation between the heel QUI and the spine and hip BMD by DXA, no heel T-score could predict osteopenia or osteoporosis with satisfactory sensitivity and specificity. It is possible that the use of risk factor assessment plus heel QUI might have better predictive value, and further studies are needed to determine whether heel QUI or other US determination is an independent risk factor for fracture in men.     

绝经后中国女性跟骨定量超声和双能X线检查骨质疏松症的对比研究

目的观察绝经后中国女性跟骨定量超声和双能X线检查骨质疏松症的效果比较。方法评估234名绝经后未接受过治疗的40～80岁女性的腰椎、双侧股骨颈和全髋关节部位的骨密度(bone mineral density,BMD)的DXA参数和左右跟骨的QUS参数。计算BMD和QUS参数的相关系数。生成接收器操作特性曲线,并评估曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)来定义QUS的截止值。结果跟骨QUS能够识别右侧髋关节(AUC,0. 887)和左股骨颈(AUC,0. 824)的T值为-2. 5或更低的绝经后妇女。为了筛选目的,定义了右侧(1. 455)和左侧(1. 480)跟骨的QUS T值的截止值。结论与DXA这种标准的诊断方法相比,可以推荐QUS作为预筛选工具来减少DXA筛查的数量。     

Clinical utility of spine bone density in elderly women.

It is common clinical practice to obtain a bone density measurement at both the hip and spine to evaluate osteoporosis. With aging, degenerative changes in the lumbar spine may elevate the bone mineral density (BMD) results giving false assurances that the fracture risk at the spine is low. We examined the association of spine osteoarthritis and bone mineral density in 1082 community-dwelling ambulatory older women aged 50-96 years who participated in a 1992-1996 osteoporosis research clinic visit. The BMD was measured at the hip and posteroanterior (PA) and lateral lumbar spine using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Spine osteoarthritis was identified on the PA lumbar spine DXA images by a musculoskeletal radiologist. Forty percent of women had evidence of spine osteoarthritis (OA). Women with spine OA had a mean age of 77.4 yr (95% confidence interval [CI]: 76.5-78.2), were significantly older than women without spine OA (mean age, 66.8 yr; 95% CI: 65.9-67.7), and were more likely to have prevalent radiographic fractures (14.2% vs. 9.5%; p<0.05). Age-adjusted BMD at the femoral neck, total hip, PA spine, and lateral spine was significantly higher in women with spine OA. Women with spine OA were more likely to have osteoporosis by the World Health Organization classification at the femoral neck and total hip than those without spine OA, but less likely based on the PA spine (14.4% vs. 24.5%). Despite higher BMD levels, women with OA of the lumbar spine had higher prevalence of osteoporosis at the hip and more radiographic vertebral fractures. In elderly women 65 yr and older who are likely to have spine OA, the DXA measurement of the spine may not be useful in assessing fracture risk, and DXA of the hip is recommended for identification of osteoporosis.     

Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX

Osteoporosis is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. Screening of post-menopausal women for clinical risk factors and/or low bone mineral density (BMD) has been proposed to overcome this. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) estimates hand BMD from standard hand X-ray images and have shown to predict fractures and osteoporosis. Recently, digital radiology and the internet have opened up the possibility of conducting automated opportunistic screening with DXR in post-fracture care or in combination with mammography. This study compared the performance of DXR with FRAX® and DXA in discriminating major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) (hip, clinical spine, forearm or shoulder), hip fracture and femoral neck osteoporosis. This prospective cohort study was conducted on 5278 women 65 years and older in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) cohort. Baseline hand X-ray images were analyzed and fractures were ascertained during 10 years of follow up. Age-adjusted area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for MOF and hip fracture and for femoral neck osteoporosis (DXA FN BMD T-score ≤− 2.5) was used to compare the methods. Sensitivity to femoral neck osteoporosis at equal selection rates was tabulated for FRAX and DXR. DXR-BMD, FRAX (no BMD) and lumbar spine DXA BMD were all similar in fracture discriminative performance with an AUC around 0.65 for MOF and 0.70 for hip fractures for all three methods. As expected femoral neck DXA provided fracture discrimination superior both to other BMD measurements and to FRAX. AUC for selection of patients with femoral neck osteoporosis was higher with DXR-BMD, 0.76 (0.74–0.77), than with FRAX, 0.69 (0.67–0.71), (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, DXR-BMD discriminates incident fractures to a similar degree as FRAX and predicts femoral neck osteoporosis to a larger degree than FRAX. DXR shows promise as a method to automatically flag individuals who might benefit from an osteoporosis assessment.     

Oral daily ibandronate prevents bone loss in early postmenopausal women without osteoporosis.

Oral daily ibandronate was investigated for the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women without osteoporosis (n = 653). BMD at the lumbar spine and hip were significantly increased (3.1% and 1.8%, respectively; p < or = 0.0001 versus placebo) with 2.5 mg ibandronate after 24 months. Oral ibandronate is a promising option for the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss. INTRODUCTION: Further strategies to manage patients most at risk from developing postmenopausal osteoporosis are required. The objectives of this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study were to examine the efficacy, tolerability, and optimal dose of oral daily ibandronate in the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 653 women (mean bone mineral density [BMD] T-score > -2.5 at the lumbar spine), who had been postmenopausal for at least 1 year, were allocated to one of four strata based on time since menopause and baseline lumbar spine BMD. Women were randomized to receive calcium (500 mg daily) plus either placebo (n = 162) or ibandronate 0.5 mg (n = 162), 1 mg (n = 166), or 2.5 mg (n = 163) as once-daily oral treatment for 2 years. The primary endpoint was the mean percent change in lumbar spine BMD with ibandronate versus placebo. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: After 2 years, oral daily ibandronate produced a dose-related and sustained maintenance or increase in BMD at the lumbar spine and hip (total hip, femoral neck, trochanter), together with a dose-related reduction in the rate of bone turnover. The greatest nominal increases in spinal and hip BMD were observed with the 2.5-mg dose, which produced statistically significant BMD gains compared with placebo at 6 months and all subsequent time-points at the spine and hip (3.1% and 1.8% increase in lumbar spine and total hip BMD, respectively, versus placebo; p < or = 0.0001 after 24 months). Oral daily ibandronate was well tolerated with an incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events similar to placebo. No safety concerns were identified. In summary, oral daily ibandronate 2.5 mg decreases bone turnover, preserves or increases BMD in the spine and proximal femur, and is well tolerated. Oral ibandronate provides a promising option for the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women.     

唑来膦酸盐(5mg)干预绝经后骨质疏松症对骨量的影响

 目的 观察唑来膦酸盐(5 mg, 单次)治疗绝经后骨质疏松症妇女骨密度和跌倒风险的作用。方法 采用随机对照研究, 观察期为1 年。91 例绝经后骨质疏松症妇女经知情同意后, 随机分为两组。唑来膦酸盐组45 例院唑来膦酸盐5 mg(30 min 静脉滴注, 1 次), 骨化三醇0.25 ug 和钙剂600 mg 及维生素D 125 ID(1 次/d, 1 年); 对照组46 例院骨化三醇0.25 滋g 和钙剂600 mg 及维生素D 125 ID(1 次/d, 1 年)。用药前和用药12 个月后测量腰椎尧髋部及股骨颈骨密度和跌倒风险, 并进行患者不良反应和随访情况进行比较。结果 干预1 年后, 两组各有41例患者得到随访。与干预前自身比较, 唑来膦酸盐组患者腰椎尧髋部总量和股骨颈骨量均明显增加, 分别为5.8%, 3.9%和2.9%, 差异均有统计学意义; 对照组患者腰椎骨量与干预前自身比较有明显增加, 达4.4%。两组患者经治疗后跌倒风险较治疗前均明显降低, 组间比较差异无统计学意义。唑来膦酸盐组患者未见无法耐受的不良反应。结论 唑来膦酸盐(5 mg, 单次)治疗绝经后骨质疏松症可明显提高腰椎尧髋部和股骨颈骨密度, 联合应用活性维生素D 能进一步降低跌倒风险。唑来膦酸盐(5 mg)是临床骨质疏松症长期治疗疗效得以保证的重要手段。     

Bone mineral density assessment: comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements at the calcaneus, spine, and hip.

It is widely accepted that bone mineral density (BMD) measurements obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the spine, hip, and calcaneus predict fracture risk. Few published studies to date have examined the relationship between pDXA measurements at the calcaneus to those at the hip and spine. It has been demonstrated that T-score-based criteria cannot be universally applied to all skeletal sites and measurement technologies. Our goal was to define the calcaneal T-score threshold equivalent to low bone mass at the hip or spine. A total of 119 female patients between the ages of 33 and 76 yr of age were recruited at Boston University Medical Center for bone densitometry screening. Bone density measurements were obtained at the calcaneus using the portable Norland Apollo Densitometer (Norland Medical Systems, Fort Atkinson, WI) and at the hip and spine using the Norland Eclipse densitometer. By defining a pDXA T-score < or =-1 as a positive test and DXA scores < or =-1 as the presence of low bone mass, we obtained a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 73% (positive predictive value 100% and negative predictive value 80%) in detecting low bone mass at the femoral neck in women over age 65 yr. In women between 40 and 65 yr of age, we obtained a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 93% (positive predictive value 93% and negative predictive value 50%) in detecting low bone mass at the femoral neck. In women less than 40 yr of age, we obtained a sensitivity of 13% and a specificity of 100% (positive predictive value 100% and negative predictive value 75%) in detecting low bone mass at the femoral neck. From receiver operating characteristic curves, a calcaneal T-score < or =0.0 detects those with a T-score < or =-1 at the femoral neck and lumbar spine with 100% and 85% sensitivity, respectively. Peripheral DXA of the calcaneus is a sensitive and specific test to diagnose low bone mass in women over 65 yr of age. In women under 65 yr of age, this modality, though not as sensitive, is specific in detecting low bone mass. We conclude that a pDXA calcaneal T-score < or =0 is highly sensitive in predicting osteopenia and osteoporosis at the femoral neck and lumbar spine.     

The prevalence of significant left-right differences in hip bone mineral density

Introduction We determined the prevalence of left-right differences in hip bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and the resultant consequence, namely: the frequency at which patients would be classified differently if lumbar spine and only one hip (rather than both hips) were measured.Methods This was a retrospective DXA scan reanalysis of 3012 white women ≥50 yrs who had scans of both hips using Hologic DXA systems. The difference between left and right hips was considered significant if it exceeded the least significant change (LSC) for any of three hip subregions (total hip, femoral neck, trochanter). The number of women with osteoporosis in both hips, the left hip only, or the right hip only was determined by lowest T-score from total hip, femoral neck, or trochanter.Results Despite high left-right correlations of subregion BMD, significant left-right differences in BMD were common: the difference exceeded the LSC for 47% of women at total hip, 31% at femoral neck, and 56% at trochanter. Left-right differences in BMD that exceeded the LSC affected the percent agreement of left-right hip classification: for all women irrespective of spine status, there was 77% classification (diagnostic) agreement in hip pairs in which the left-right hip BMD difference exceeded the LSC versus 87% agreement in which LSC was not exceeded (significant difference in proportions, P<0.0001). The greatest risk of different classification would occur in women with normal spines as the diagnosis might be determined by hip T-scores. Using L1-4 lumbar spine T-scores, 1229 women were normal at the spine. Twenty-four (2%) were osteoporotic at both hips. However, 12 women (1%) were osteoporotic only in the left hip (significantly different from zero, P<0.001) and 11 (1%) only in the right hip (P<0.001); of these 23 women, the difference in BMD between the osteoporotic hip and the contralateral hip exceeded the LSC in 16 (70% of those with osteoporosis in only one hip). Using L1-4 lumbar spine T-scores, 1159 women were osteopenic at the spine. Of these, 126 (11%) were osteoporotic at both hips, 54 (5%) only in the left hip (P<0.001), and 42 (4%) only in the right hip (P<0.001); of these 96 women, the difference in BMD between the osteoporotic hip and the contralateral hip exceeded the LSC in 56 (58% of those with osteoporosis in only one hip).Conclusions A statistically significant number of women with osteoporosis are potentially classified differently when scanning only one hip as a result of the high prevalence of left-right differences in BMD. Although the percentages are low, the total number of women affected may be large. From a public health perspective, the practice of scanning both hips could potentially identify more women with osteoporosis and may help prevent future hip fractures.     

The relationship between bone mineral density and ultrasound in postmenopausal and osteoporotic women

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to use a novel method of data analysis to demonstrate that patients with osteoporosis have significantly lower ultrasound results in the heel after correcting for the effect of bone mineral density (BMD) measured in the spine or hip. Three groups of patients were studied: healthy early postmenopausal women, within 3 years of the menopause (n=104, 50%), healthy late postmenopausal women, more than 10 years from the menopause (n=75, 36%), and a group of women with osteoporosis as defined by WHO criteria (n=30, 14%). Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS) and Stiffness were measured using a Lunar Achilles heel machine, and BMD of the lumbar spine and left hip was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). SOS, BUA and Stiffness were regressed against lumbar spine BMD and femoral BMD for all three groups combined. The correlation coefficients were in the range 0.52–0.58, in agreement with previously published work. Using a calculated ratio R, analysis of variance demonstrated that the ratio was significantly higher in the osteoporotic group compared with the other two groups. This implied that heel ultrasound values are proportionately lower in the osteoporotic group compared with the other two groups for an equivalent value of lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD. We conclude that postmenopausal bone loss is not associated with different ultasound values once lumbar spine or femoral neck BMD is taken into account. Ultrasound does not give additional information about patterns of bone loss in postmenopausal patients but is important in those patients with osteoporosis and fractures.     

北京地区3859名体检人群骨密度调查及骨量异常患病率分析

目的调查北京地区健康体检人群骨密度的情况以及骨量减少和骨质疏松的患病率,为骨质疏松症的防治提供参考。方法选择2017年1月至2018年12月在中日友好医院健康体检中心进行健康体检的人群,排除继发性骨质疏松症及其他影响骨代谢的因素,共3859名。其中男性2067名,女性1792名。年龄20~83岁,平均年龄(51.29±11.18)岁,按性别及年龄每10年一组。采用美国GE公司的LUNAR Prodigy双能X线骨密度仪测量受试者腰椎1~4正位及股骨颈和全髋的骨密度。分析各组不同部位骨密度情况及骨量异常(包括骨量减少和骨质疏松)的患病率。采用SPSS 22.0统计软件进行分析,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果①男性腰椎1~4骨密度峰值在20~29岁,股骨颈和全髋骨密度峰值在30~39岁。女性各部位骨密度峰值均在30~39岁。②随年龄增长,男性和女性骨量异常患病率均呈上升趋势,50岁以上女性骨量异常患病率显著上升,明显高于同年龄组男性。③30~59岁男性和女性腰椎骨量异常患病率均明显高于髋部;70岁以上男性和60岁以上女性髋部骨量异常患病率明显高于腰椎。结论中老年人群尤其是绝经后女性是骨质疏松症的高危人群;老年人群的骨质疏松筛查可以考虑选择髋部骨密度为主。     

Prevalence of osteoporosis and reference data for lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density in a Korean population

The aims of this study were to establish reference data for bone mineral density (BMD) at central skeletal sites using Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and to estimate the age-and sex-specific prevalence of osteoporosis in a Korean population. We performed a population-based, cross-sectional study. The subjects were 4148 (1810 men and 2338 women) Korean adults, aged 20–79 years. The BMD for central sites (lumbar spine, femoral neck, trochanter, and Ward’s triangle) were measured by DXA. The standardized prevalence of osteoporosis among individual aged 50–79 years in lumbar spine, femoral neck, Ward’s triangle, and trochanter was 40.1%, 12.4%, 28.4%, and 4.4% in women and 6.5%, 5.9%, 3.7%, and 1.6% in men, respectively. In women, peak BMD occurred in the age range 40–49 years for the femoral neck and trochanter, 30–39 years for the lumbar spine, and 20–29 years for Ward’s triangle. In men, peak BMD values were observed at 20–29 years for all measured sites. This study establishes a normative database for BMD at central skeletal sites using dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry and provides more reliable information on the prevalence of osteoporosis in Korea.     

Country-Specific Young Adult Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Reference Data Are Warranted for T-Score Calculations in Women: Data From the Peak-25 Cohort

The aims of this study were to provide normative data for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 25-yr-old women and evaluate whether young adult Swedish women have bone mineral density (BMD) comparable with DXA manufacturer reference values and other equivalent populations. BMD at all sites was measured in the population-based Peak-25 cohort (n = 1061 women; age, 25.5 ± 0.2 yr). BMD values were standardized (sBMD) and compared against the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) and other cohorts. Based on the DXA manufacturer–supplied reference values, Z-scores were 0.54 ± 0.98 (femoral neck [FN]), 0.47 ± 0.96 (total hip [TH]), and 0.32 ± 1.03 (lumbar spine [LS]). In comparison with other studies, sBMD was higher in the Peak-25 cohort (FN, 1.5%–8.3%; TH, 3.9%–9.2%; and LS, 2.4%–6.5%) with the exception of trochanter-sBMD which was 2.5% lower compared with NHANES III. The concordance in identifying those in the lowest or highest quartile of BMD was highest between hip measurements (low, 71%–78% and high, 70%–84%), corresponding discordance of 0%–1%. At this age, the correlation between DXA sites was strong (r = 0.62–0.94). BMD in Swedish young adult women is generally higher than has been reported in other equivalently aged European and North American cohorts and suggests that the high fracture incidence in Sweden is not explained by lower peak bone mass. The use of nonregional-specific DXA reference data could contribute to misdiagnosed osteoporosis in elderly women.     

A Comparative Study of Computed Digital Absorptiometry and Conventional Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Postmenopausal Women

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether computed digital absorptiometry (CDA) of the hand might be a useful screening technique for identifying patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis and to compare the results of CDA with those of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine and femoral neck. We studied 230 postmenopausal women (mean age 58.4 ± 7.9 years). For CDA, bone mineral density (BMD) was measured with an AccuDEXA Schick densitometer in the third middle phalanx of the nondominant hand. For DXA, BMD of the lumbar spine and upper femur was assessed using a DXA Hologic QDR-1000 densitometer. We did a comparative analysis (ANOVA) and linear correlation tests. Sensitivity and specificity of CDA and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the diagnosis of osteoporosis were calculated. The mean BMD with CDA was 0.445 ± 0.084 (T-score: −1.27 ± 1.29). The mean BMD (g/cm²) with DXA at the lumbar spine was 0.877 ± 0.166 (T-score: −1.52 ± 1.59) and 0.708 ± 0.127 at the femoral neck (T-score: −1.12 ± 1.25). BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck correlated positively with CDA of the hand (r= 0.66 and r= 0.65 respectively, p<0.001). When using as cut-off a T-score of −2.5, according to WHO criteria, 76 women (33%) had osteoporosis of the lumbar spine and/or femoral neck with DXA and 42 (18%) with CDA (p<0.001). The kappa score for osteoporosis was 0.33 for CDA versus spinal DXA and 0.35 for CDA versus femoral DXA. With the cut-off level used, sensitivity and specificity of CDA in detecting osteoporosis at the lumbar spine were 0.39 and 0.90, respectively; sensitivity and specificity of CDA in identifying osteoporosis at the femoral neck were 0.58 and 0.87, respectively. The positive predictive value of CDA for osteoporosis was 69% and the negative predictive value was 75%. The area under the ROC curve for osteoporosis was 0.822 ± 0.028. We conclude that: (a) CDA assessment has a moderate correlation with BMD measured by DXA at the lumbar spine and femoral neck; (b) CDA has a low sensitivity for the diagnosis of osteoporosis compared with spinal and femoral DXA; and (c) predictive values for osteoporosis at both the lumbar spine and femoral neck are acceptable. Received: September 2000 / Accepted: January 2001     

Peak bone mineral density in Vietnamese women

Summary

This cross-sectional study showed that peak bone mineral density in Vietnamese women is comparable to that in Caucasian women; however, the prevalence of osteoporosis in post-menopausal Vietnamese women was slightly higher than in Caucasian women. The age of achieving peak bone mass in Vietnamese women was between 26 and 30 years.

Introduction

While peak bone mass and its determinants have been well-documented in Caucasian populations, little has been studied in Asian populations. The present study was designed to estimate the peak bone mineral density (BMD), age of its attainment, and to examine the prevalence of osteoporosis in Vietnamese women aged 50+.

Methods

The study was designed as a cross-sectional study with 328 women aged between 10 and 65 years (average age: 41) who were randomly selected from two districts around Hanoi city according to a stratified sampling scheme. BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip was measured by a DXA instrument (GE Lunar Prodigy, WI, USA). BMD was modeled as a cubic function of age, from which peak BMD and age at peak BMD were estimated. Bootstrap method was utilized to estimate the 95% confidence interval of peak BMD and age at peak BMD. From the peak BMD, T-score was calculated for each woman, and using the World Health Organization criteria, any woman with femoral neck BMD T-score ≤ -2.5 was classified as having osteoporosis.

Results

Peak BMD was estimated at 1.16 g/cm² (standard deviation [SD]: 0.13 g/cm²) at the lumbar spine, 1.02 g/cm² (SD 0.12) at the total hip, and 0.94 g/cm² (SD 0.11) at the femoral neck. In the cubic polynomial model, the age at peak BMD was estimated to range between 27 and 29 years. The prevalence of osteoporosis among those aged between 50 and 65 years was 23%. This prevalence was higher than in Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Caucasian populations.

Conclusion

These data suggest that although the peak BMD in Vietnamese women is comparable to, the prevalence of osteoporosis is higher than, in some other Asian and Caucasian women. It seems that osteoporosis is an important public health burden in Vietnam.