An open-labeled phase II trial of docetaxel in combination with cisplatin as first-line cytotoxic therapy for anthracycline-naive patients with metastatic breast cancer

The combination of docetaxel and cisplatin has shown promising results in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer, but with substantial toxicity. The efficacy and safety in anthracycline-naive patients has not been evaluated. Between October 2003 and January 2006, we enrolled 39 patients. None had undergone chemotherapy for metastatic disease or been exposure to adjuvant anthracycline-based regimens earlier. Eligibility criteria included: histologically proven metastatic cancer; WHO performance status (PS) 0-2; and adequate hematological, hepatic and renal function. Docetaxel (70 mg/m) and cisplatin (50 mg/m) were administered every 3 weeks until the patient either refused to continue, or progression, or even unacceptable toxicity occurred. Tumor response was assessed every three cycles. One patient was withdrawn from response analysis because of toxicity. Thirty-eight patients had a complete tumor assessment. Median age was 50 years (range, 28-63); 5.1% had a WHO of PS of 0; 87% a PS of 1; 7.7% a PS of 2; in 69%, two or more organs were involved. A total of 291 cycles (range, 1-9) were administered. Three complete responses and 27 partial responses (intent-to-treat response rate 30/39=76.9%) resulted; disease remained stable in six patients and two had disease progression. Grade III/IV toxicities included diarrhea in 10.2%, asthenia/fatigue in 2.5%, mucositis in 5.1% and neutropenia in 87.3% of patients. Seven patients developed febrile neutropenia (17.9%). The median time to progression was 11.2 months; the timespan was not sufficient to track the median survival. Docetaxel/cisplatin is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, but it is not sufficiently promising as a standard. Further randomized study is warranted.     

Weekly epirubicin and paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in previously untreated metastatic breast cancer patients: a phase II study

We conducted a phase II study to determine the activity and tolerability of weekly epirubicin-paclitaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in breast cancer patients untreated for metastatic disease. The phase II study was designed following the Simon optimal-two stage method. Patients received epirubicin 25 mg/m and paclitaxel 80 mg/m every week, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on days 2 and 4 for 24 consecutive weeks in the absence of progression. From 1999 to 2004, 53 patients entered the study; 1093 weekly courses were delivered, with a median number of cycles of 22. Patients received a median relative dose intensity of 94%. No hematological grade 3-4 toxicities were observed. One patient had one episode of grade 3 mucositis and two patients (3.8%) suffered grade 2 asthenia. Eight patients (15.1%) experienced grade 2 neutropenia, grade 2 anemia was registered in seven patients (13.2%). No cardiotoxicity was observed. Ten out of 53 patients (18.9, 95% confidence interval 8.3, 29.4%) showed a complete response, whereas 28 (52.8, 95% confidence interval 39.4, 66.3%) had a partial response, with an overall response rate of 71.7% (95% confidence interval 59.6, 83.8%). In addition, 14 patients (26.4%) had stable disease. Median time to progression was 12 months (95% confidence interval 7, 17). Median response duration was 14 months (range 3-60). The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 90.1, 68.0 and 56.6%, respectively. In untreated metastatic breast cancer patients, the weekly administration of epirubicin and paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support seems to be extremely tolerable and active, and deserves further investigation into a phase III trial.     

Oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil for heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer: a preliminary phase II study

Oxaliplatin shows in vitro and in vivo synergism with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In this study we evaluate the clinical efficacy of oxaliplatin and 5-FU in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Eligible patients had to be pretreated with both anthracyclines and taxanes. Pretreatment with capecitabine was recommended but not mandatory. Chemotherapy: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2/2 h day 1, folinic acid 400 mg/m2/2 h day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m2 i.v. push day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion/48 h day 1, q2w. Fourteen patients were included: one male and 13 females; age: median 53 years (38-62); ECOG 0: three patients, 1: nine patients, 2: two patients; all patients were pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes, capecitabine: nine patients, vinorelbine: six patients, trastuzumab: four patients, hormonal therapy: 12 patients; lines of prior palliative chemotherapy: 0: one patient, 1: three patients, 2: one patient, 3: three patients, 4: four patients, 5: two patients. Results: median number of cycles: 8 (range 1-17). Toxicity (14 patients evaluable; no. of patients with Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3/4): asthenia: 2/-, paraesthesia 3/-, leuko/neutropenia: 1/2, no neutropenic fever, other (alopecia, skin): 2/-. Response (12 patients evaluable, all with bidimensionally measurable disease): complete remission: no patients, partial remission: four patients (33%, all confirmed), stable disease: five patients, progressive disease: three patients. We conclude that despite the small number of patients, the combination of 5-FU and oxaliplatin shows promising efficacy in this heavily pretreated population.     

Safety and efficacy of weekly docetaxel in frail and/or elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study

This phase II study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of weekly docetaxel (36 mg/m) for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in 47 frail and/or elderly patients who were ineligible for the standard 3-weekly docetaxel (100 mg/m) regimen. Reasons for ineligibility to the latter were age > or = 70 years (10 patients), poor hematological reserves (15 patients), impaired liver function (eight patients), intolerance to previous taxanes administered 3-weekly without demonstrated resistance (five patients) or any combination of these reasons (nine patients). There was a median of two prior chemotherapy regimens and more than 60% had a WHO performance score at baseline of 2-3. A total of 408 weekly administrations were given over a period of 525 weeks (78% of the intended dose intensity) and the median cumulative dose of docetaxel per patient was 278 mg/m. The incidence of serious adverse events was low. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in six patients and grade 4 in four patients. Of these 10 patients, eight had pre-existing hematological abnormalities and four developed neutropenic fever. Neurotoxicity was mild and grade 3 paraesthesia occurred in one patient. The overall objective response rate in 37 evaluable patients was 30% and responses were observed in all subgroups of patients. We conclude that weekly docetaxel (36 mg/m) is active, safe and well tolerated in heavily pre-treated frail/elderly patients with poor prognostic features, including low performance scores and multiple metastatic sites, who would not be eligible for treatment with the standard 3-weekly regimen.     

Phase II study of docetaxel and epirubicin in Chinese patients with metastatic breast cancer

The efficacy and safety of docetaxel-epirubicin chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer was investigated in Chinese women. Three-weekly cycles comprised epirubicin 75 mg/m2 i.v. followed 1 h later by docetaxel 75 mg/m2 i.v. After 3 cycles, responding patients received a further 3 cycles, followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel alone. Forty-six patients entered the study, of whom 37% had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Three patients withdrew due to toxicity and were not evaluable for response. There were five complete responses and 31 partial responses, giving an overall response rate of 83.7% (95% CI 72.7-94.8%). The median time to progression was 10.96 months (95% CI 7.76-12.86) and median survival was 24.2 months (95% CI 16.6-). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (96% of patients) and neutropenia with fever (39%). Hepatotoxicity occurred in six patients, two being attributable to hepatitis B virus reactivation. No patients suffered grade 3/4 cardiac toxicity and there were no treatment-related mortalities. Quality of life aspects deteriorated after 3 cycles, but there was a trend towards improved emotional aspects after 9 cycles. We conclude that docetaxel-epirubicin chemotherapy is highly effective for recurrent metastatic/locoregional breast cancer, with myelosuppression being the main toxicity.     

Weekly paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in metastatic breast cancer patients: a phase II study

We conducted a phase II study to determine the activity and tolerability of weekly paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in anthracycline-pre-treated or -resistant metastatic breast cancer patients. The phase II study was designed following the Simon optimal-two stage method. Patients received paclitaxel 80 mg/m, folinic acid 10 mg/m and bolus infusion of 5-FU 300 mg/m every week plus G-CSF on day 3 for 24 consecutive weeks in the absence of disease progression. From May 1998 to May 2000, 51 patients entered the study. Patients received a median relative dose intensity of 97.5% (range 81-100%). No severe toxicities were observed. Seven patients (14%) experienced neutropenia grade 2. Seven patients (14%) experienced grade 2 anemia. Two patients (4%) experienced severe asthenia. Three out of 50 evaluable patients [6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2-12.6%] showed a complete response, whereas 23 (46%, 95% CI 32.2-59.8%) had a partial response, with an overall response rate of 52% (95% CI 38.2-65.8%). In addition, eight patients (15.7%) had stable disease. In the 13 patients untreated for metastatic disease, the overall response rate was 92.3% (CI 77.8-100), with one complete response and 11 partial responses (84.6% CI 65-100%). In the whole group, the median time to progression and overall survival were 8 (range 1-18) and 14 months (95% CI 11-17), respectively. Thus, in metastatic breast cancer patients pre-treated with anthracyclines, the weekly administration of paclitaxel, 5-FU and folinic acid with G-CSF support seems to be extremely tolerable and active.     

A phase II study of dose-dense docetaxel and mitoxantrone in the treatment of patients with high-risk metastatic breast cancer

Doxetaxel (DCT) and mitoxantrone (MX) are highly active and potentially synergistic agents in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This pilot study evaluates the combination of dose-dense DCT and MX in patients with MBC to determine the efficacy and toxicity of this therapy. Thirty-six patients (56.1+/-1.7 years) were studied. The patients received DCT (35 mg/m(2) q1w) and MX (6 mg/m(2) q2w) for 6 weeks of an 8-week interval. Patients with tumor response or stable disease (SD) continued the treatment for a maximum of two additional periods. Hematologic and non-hematologic parameters were determined using the WHO common toxicity score. During this study 14 patients (40%) experienced partial response, 14 (40%) SD. In 20% of the cases the disease progressed on therapy. The treatment with DCT and MX was well tolerated. Seventeen patients (47%) experienced grade 3 leukopenia. Other hematologic and non-hematologic side effects did not exceed grade 2. One patient died during therapy because of a pulmonary embolism, which was unlikely related to active agents. Dose-dense DCT and MX combines both clinical activity and convenience for the patient. Therefore, we conclude that this regimen is a promising therapy in MBC, which warrants confirmation by large-scale clinical trials.     

A phase II trial of pemetrexed in patients with metastatic renal cancer

Background. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is rising in incidence but remains difficult to treat. This clinical trial evaluated the effects of pemetrexed (multitargeted antifolate, ALIMTA®) for the treatment of metastatic RCC. Patients and methods. Patients were required to have histological diagnosis of metastatic RCC with measurable disease and no prior chemotherapy. In addition, patients were required to have a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status of 0–2 and adequate bone marrow reserve. Patients received pemetrexed at a dose of 600mg/m² as a 10min infusion every 3 weeks. Patients did not receive folic acid or vitamin B₁₂ supplementation. Results. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled and thirty two were evaluable for response. Three patients had a partial response for a response rate of 9% (95% CI 2–25%). The median time to progressive disease was 10.5 months. Of the nonresponders, twenty two had stable disease (median duration was 5.8 months; range 1.5–27.7) and seven had progressive disease (median time to progression was 5.4 months). Median time to progression for all qualified patients was 5.7 months. Common toxicities experienced were diarrhea and infection. Fatigue, stomatitis, and rash were also reported. The most common hematologic toxicity was grade 3/4 lymphopenia in 76% of patients. Leukopenia, granulocytopenia, and thrombocytopenia were also frequently reported. Conclusion. Single-agent pemetrexed has moderate activity in the treatment of metastatic RCC and should be investigated in combination with other potential active agents, as first-line treatment.     

Weekly administration of bendamustine as salvage therapy in metastatic breast cancer: final results of a phase II study

Single-agent bendamustine has shown promise in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. As toxicity was low after weekly administration of this drug in other solid tumors, the present double-center phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly bendamustine as salvage treatment in metastatic breast cancer. A total of 34 patients with anthracycline (88%) and/or taxane (71%) pretreated for metastatic breast cancer received 60 mg/m bendamustine on day 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days for six cycles. In addition, 10 patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing tumors either continued (five patients) or started treatment with 2 mg/kg trastuzumab weekly (loading dose 4 mg/kg) at study entry. Patients had predominantly visceral disease and had received one (88%) or two chemotherapy regimens for metastatic breast cancer. All patients were eligible for toxicity and 27 for response evaluation. No grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity occurred. Only three patients experienced grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity. Five patients (19%) reached a partial response. Stable disease for at least 6 months was achieved in eight patients, for a clinical benefit rate of 48%. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 6 months (range, 1-16) and 15 months (range, 2-28), respectively. We conclude that weekly bendamustine is a valid treatment option in patients with anthracycline-pretreated and/or taxanepretreated metastatic breast cancer; in particular, due to its low toxicity profile. Future trials should evaluate higher single doses of bendamustine in a weekly schedule.     

Biweekly oxaliplatin plus irinotecan and folinic acid-modulated 5-fluorouracil: a phase II study in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Oxaliplatin (OXA) and irinotecan (IRI) are active drugs for metastatic colorectal cancer, their toxicity profiles are not overlapping, and both drugs have shown at least additivity with folinic acid-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5FU). We carried out this phase II study to assess the activity and toxicity of a biweekly regimen including OXA plus IRI on day 1, and levo-folinic acid (LFA) plus 5FU on day 2 (OXIRIFAFU) in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Forty-one patients, all previously treated with adjuvant and/or palliative 5FU-based chemotherapy (16 of them already exposed to IRI, OXA or both), were enrolled into this trial. On the basis of sensitivity to previous treatment, 19 patients were considered as chemo-resistant and 14 patients as chemo-refractory. OXA 110 mg/m (over 2 h) and IRI 175 mg/m (over 1 h) were delivered on day 1, followed by LFA 250 mg/m (2-h infusion) plus 5FU 800 mg/m as intravenous bolus on day 2. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. A total of 348 cycles were delivered, with a median of nine cycles per patient (range, 1-12 cycles per patient). Five complete and 13 partial responses were reported on 40 assessable patients, giving a response rate of 45% [95% confidence interval (CI), 29-62%]; eight of 19 (42%) resistant patients and five of 14 (36%) refractory patients achieved a major response, which was also obtained in four of eight (50%) patients pretreated with IRI and in three of eight (38%) patients pretreated with OXA. Grade 3 or higher neutropenia occurred in 68% of patients, but febrile neutropenia or infections affected only seven (17%) patients. No episodes of grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia or anemia were recorded. Occurrence of severe non-hematologic toxicities by patients were: diarrhea, 34%; vomiting, 17%; peripheral cumulative neuropathy, 15%; stomatitis, 10%; acute cholinergic syndrome, 7%. Actually delivered dose intensities of all three drugs resulted in about two-thirds of the planned ones. After a follow-up of 39 months, median progression-free survival was 7.5 months. Median overall survival was 14.4 (95% CI, 10.4-18.4) months from the start of OXIRIFAFU and 25.3 (95% CI, 18.1-32.5) months from the diagnosis of metastatic disease. This OXIRIFAFU triplet regimen was highly effective in resistant/refractory colorectal cancer patients. A slight dose reduction of all cytotoxic drugs could be advisable in order to improve the tolerability of this regimen without jeopardizing its activity.     

Phase II trial of piroxantrone in metastatic breast cancer

Summary Thirty-two eligible patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer who had received no more than 1 prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease (16 had received prior doxorubicin) were treated with piroxantrone at a dose of 120 mg/m² intravenously every 21 days. In the twenty-seven patients evaluable for response, two partial responses were seen. Toxicities observed were primarily hematologic with grade 3 or greater granulocytopenia occurring in 34% of the patients. One patient developed symptomatic congestive heart failure at a total cumulative dose of 960 mg/m². We conclude that piroxantrone given at this dose and schedule has minimal activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer.     

Single-agent docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients pre-treated with anthracyclines and paclitaxel: partial cross-resistance between paclitaxel and docetaxel

The purpose of this study was a retrospective analysis of docetaxel in a cohort of anthracyclines and paclitaxel pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. From July 1998 to June 1999, 24 consecutive patients were included for this study. The regimen consisted of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 in combination with a 3-day schedule of dexamethasone every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The median age of patients was 53 (ranged 32-67) years with a median performance status of 2. Twenty of the 24 patients (84%) had measurable disease. The median number of organs involved was 2 (range 1-4). A total of 146 cycles chemotherapy were given with a mean of 6. There was a 25% (six of 24) overall response rate including one complete response, 37.5% stable disease and 37.5% progressive disease. The major toxicity included grade 3-4 leukopenia (41.7%) and eight episodes of infection. No treatment-related death was observed. The responders included patients refractory to or resistant to prior paclitaxel treatment. The median survival and median time to disease progression was 12 and 9 months, respectively. We conclude that docetaxel has a modest activity in breast cancer patients pre-treated with anthracyclines and paclitaxel, indicating a partial cross-resistance between paclitaxel and docetaxel.     

Phase II trial of pyrazoloacridine (NSC#366140) in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Purpose: Pyrazoloacridine (PZA) is an investigational nucleic acid binding agent that inhibits the activity of topoisomerases 1 and 2. We conducted a phase II clinical study to determine the efficacy and toxicities of PZA in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Experimental Design: In this phase II multicenter study, patients who were treated with no more than one prior chemotherapy for MBC were treated with 750 mg/m2 of PZA given as a 3-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Treatment cycles were continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. The study was designed to distinguish between a response rate of <15% vs >30% (alpha = 0.10, beta = 0.10) using Simons optimal 2-stage design. At least 2 responses were required in the first 12 patients in the 1st stage and 6 of 35 in the 2nd stage to recommend the agent for further study. Results: Two patients in the first stage had a response allowing accrual to second stage. A total of 15 patients (out of 35 planned) were treated on the study prior to premature closure. Three patients had a partial response (20%) lasting 4.5–6 months. Two patients had stable disease for 3 and 5 months. The dose limiting toxicity was granulocytopenia with ten patients requiring dose reduction or dose delay for grade 4 neutropenia. Other grade 3 and 4 toxicities include vomiting (n = 2), nausea (n = 2), neurotoxicity (n = 1), fatigue (n = 1), anemia (n = 1), dyspnea 9n = 1) and renal (n = 1). Conclusions: Pyrazoloacridine demonstrated modest activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer.     

Primary chemotherapy with gemcitabine, liposomal doxorubicin and docetaxel in patients with locally advanced breast cancer: results of a phase I trial

The primary objective was to determine the optimal doses for gemcitabine (prolonged infusion), liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet) and docetaxel as primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer. Secondary objectives included evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the regimen. Patients (n=19) with histologically confirmed stage II or III breast cancer were treated with liposomal doxorubicin (50-60 mg/m2) and docetaxel (60-75 mg/m2) on day 1, and gemcitabine as 4-h infusion (350-400 mg/m2) on day 4. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles. The maximum tolerated doses were gemcitabine 350 mg/m2, liposomal doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities were stomatitis, diarrhea and infection. The predominant hematologic toxicity was mild-to-moderate myelosuppression with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 20% of cycles. Non-hematologic toxicity was generally mild, with no grade 4 toxicities being observed. Predominant non-hematologic toxicity was stomatitis, which occurred in 95% of patients. Grade 3 toxicities were reported for stomatitis, nausea, diarrhea, infection and constipation. No cases of cardiac, renal, pulmonary or neurotoxicity were observed. The clinical response rate was 83% and histologically confirmed, clinically complete remissions occurred in two patients (11%). We conclude that the combination of gemcitabine (prolonged infusion), liposomal doxorubicin and docetaxel is safe and highly effective in patients with locally advanced breast cancer as defined by maximum tolerated doses. The evaluated schedule is suitable for phase II studies.     

Paclitaxel versus docetaxel for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized phase II trial in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil

Taxanes have clearly demonstrated activities against gastric cancer. We compared the combination of paclitaxel plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (PF) with docetaxel plus 5-FU (DF) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with measurable metastatic gastric cancer. Seventy-seven patients were randomly assigned to receive paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1, in combination with 5-FU 500 mg/m2 continuous infusion on days 1-5. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Of 314 chemotherapy cycles delivered (median 5 in both groups), dose reduction was required more frequently in the DF group, being 9 and 19%, respectively (P<0.01). PF was associated with, although statistically insignificant, substantially less grade 3 or 4 toxicities than DF (68 versus 85%; P=0.09). Global quality of life was similar in both groups, but substantive differences in many symptom scores including pain, dyspnea, constipation and diarrhea favored PF. There were no significant differences in therapeutic efficacy between PF and DF with respect to response rate (42 versus 33%, respectively; P=0.53), and failure-free (3.6 versus 4.2 months; P=0.92) and overall survival (9.9 versus 9.3 months; P=0.42). Both PF and DF appear to have efficacy against metastatic gastric cancer, with different, but acceptable, safety profiles.     

Primary systemic therapy with intermittent weekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with stage II and III breast cancer: a phase II trial

The purpose of this study was to evaluate pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and adverse events with primary systemic therapy (PST) of intermittent weekly paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with stage II and III breast cancer. Node-positive patients with stage II and III breast cancer received paclitaxel 80 mg/m² followed by gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m² on day 1 and day 8, every 3 weeks for four cycles. Postoperatively, four cycles of doxorubicin 60 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² every 3 weeks were given. Of 44 enrolled patients, 73% had stage III breast cancer with 68% hormone-receptor positive and 41% HER2 positive tumors. Eight patients achieved pCR in primary tumors (18%), 11 in axillary nodes (25%), and five in both tumor and axillary nodes (11%). Breast conservation was possible in 28 patients (64%). Grade III/IV toxicities were neutropenia (57%), leukopenia (14%), febrile neutropenia (2%), and headache (2%). In conclusion, PST with intermittent weekly paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with stage II/III breast cancer is both well tolerated and effective, showing 18% pCR rate in the breast.