Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in obese patients: a case-matched control study

Purpose

This study compared the results of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in obese patients with a body-mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m² or higher with those in nonobese patients (BMI <25 kg/m²) who were matched for clinicohistopathological factors.

Methods

The oncologic outcomes were compared between 140 patients with a BMI of 25 kg/m² or higher (obese group) and 140 patients with a BMI of <25 kg/m² (nonobese group) that were matched for sex, tumor location, date of operation, and pTNM stage.

Results

The proportion of patients with postoperative complications was significantly higher in the obese group (15 %) than in the nonobese group (6 %). The disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate in patients with stage I or II disease were similar in the obese group (98.6 and 98.8 %, respectively) and the nonobese group (97.8 and 97.8 %, respectively). The disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate in patients with stage III disease also did not differ significantly between the obese group (77.2 and 79.4 %, respectively) and the nonobese group (83.4 and 84.9 %, respectively).

Conclusions

Postoperative complications and long-term oncologic outcomes were similar in obese and nonobese patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer in this hospital.     

Morbid obesity is not a contraindication to kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Concern that morbidly obese (body mass index [BMI] 35) kidney transplant recipients have worse outcomes than non-morbidly obese recipients leads many transplant centers to deny them the benefit of kidney transplantation. These concerns are supported by guidelines recently published by the American Society of Transplantation. However, successfully transplanted morbidly obese persons have a survival advantage over those that remain on dialysis. It is our practice to evaluate morbidly obese transplant candidates for transplantation under the same criteria used for nonobese candidates. This report reviews our experience with morbidly obese kidney transplant recipients having a three year follow-up. METHODS: Outcomes for 23 morbidly obese (BMI 35, range 37 to 56) kidney transplant recipients transplanted between January 1995 and February 2000 were compared with 224 nonobese (BMI 25) kidney recipients transplanted during the same period. RESULTS: Patient and graft survivals were similar between both groups. Although 3-year graft survival for morbidly obese recipients of cadaver organs was 75% compared with 90% for the nonobese group, this finding was not statistically significant, and 3-year graft survival was 100% for morbidly obese recipients of living donor organs compared with 91% for nonobese recipients. Morbidly obese recipients had significantly longer hospital stays, higher readmission rates, and a higher wound infection rate than nonobese recipients. CONCLUSIONS: We found that morbidly obese persons have 3-year graft and patient survivals similar to nonobese persons. Although they also have greater complications and greater numbers of days in the hospital, we believe these reasons are not sufficient to deny morbidly obese persons the survival and quality-of-life advantages of kidney transplantation.     

The role of obesity in kidney transplantation outcome

Background

The number of obese kidney transplant candidates has been growing. However, there are conflicting results regarding to the effect of obesity on kidney transplantation outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the body mass index (BMI) and graft survival by using continuous versus categoric BMI values as an independent risk factor in renal transplantation.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 376 kidney transplant recipients to evaluate graft and patient survivals between normal-weight, overweight, and obese patients at the time of transplantation, considering BMI as a categoric variable.

Results

Obese patients were more likely to be male and older than normal-weight recipients (P = .021; P = .002; respectively). Graft loss was significantly higher among obese compared with nonobese recipients. Obese patients displayed significantly lower survival compared with nonobese subjects at 1 year (76.9% vs 35.3%; P = .024) and 3 years (46.2% vs 11.8%; P = .035).

Conclusions

Obesity may represent an independent risk factor for graft loss and patient death. Careful patient selection with pretransplantation weight reduction is mandatory to reduce the rate of early posttransplantation complications and to improve long-term outcomes.     

Severe Obesity Increases Risk of Infection After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe increasing prevalence of obesity has resulted in an increased number of revision total hip arthroplasties (rTHAs) performed in patients with a high body mass index (BMI). The aim of this study is to evaluate whether obesity negatively affects (1) complication rate, (2) reoperation and revision rate, and (3) patient-reported outcome in rTHA.MethodsIn this registry-based study, we prospectively followed 444 rTHAs (cup: n = 265, stem: n = 57, both: n = 122) performed in a specialized high-volume orthopedic center between 2013 and 2015. The number of complications, and reoperation and revision surgery was registered until 5 years postoperatively. Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was evaluated preoperatively, and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Patients were categorized based on BMI to nonobese (<30 kg/m², n = 328), obese (30-35 kg/m², n = 82), and severe obese (≥35 kg/m², n = 34).ResultsSevere obese patients, but not obese patients, had higher risks of complications and re-revision than nonobese patients. In particular, the risk of infection following rTHA was higher in severe obese patients (24%) compared to nonobese patients (3%; relative risk, 7.7). Severe obese patients had overall poorer OHS than nonobese patients, but improvement in OHS did not differ between severe obese and nonobese patients. No differences between obese and nonobese groups on OHS were observed.ConclusionIn our study, severe obesity was associated with an increased risk of infection following rTHA. Patients with high BMI should be counseled appropriately before surgery.     

Obesity in renal transplantation: the role of induction therapy on long-term outcomes

Obesity is a burgeoning problem among renal transplant recipients given its association with increased morbidity, graft loss, and mortality. The long-term influence of different induction therapies in obese compared to nonobese patients is uncertain. We examined the long-term effect of low-dose rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG; 3-5 mg/kg) induction therapy compared to two doses of 20 mg basiliximab (BSX) in nonobese and obese renal transplant patients. The medical records of all adult (>18 years) recipients of kidney transplants between June 2001 and June 2009 in our center were reviewed. Patients whose body mass index (BMI) was greater than 30 were considered to be obese. The average dose of rATG was 3.2 ± 1.6 mg/kg. A total of 475 patients were included. In the nonobese group with a BMI less than 30, 68 received BSX and 247, rATG. In the obese group, 27 patients were given BSX and 133 were given rATG. Mean follow-up was 1523 days. These four groups were similar in baseline characteristics including: donor and recipient age, percent diabetes, living donors, panel-reactive antibodies > 35, HLA mismatch, race, gender, and maintenance immunosuppression. Serum creatinine levels at 3 months and 1, 5, and 7 years were not statistically different between groups. Compared to BSX induction therapy, rATG was associated with better graft survival at 47.4 ± 10 months in obese (63.6% vs 90.3%, P < .05, respectively) as well as nonobese patients (68.2% vs 88.7%, P < .05, respectively). Rejections were numerically lower in rATG-treated obese patients, which reached statistical significance in nonobese patients. Wound and viral infections were not statistically different between rATG and BSX groups. Therefore, low-dose rATG is associated with a better long-term graft survival rate in obese patients without incurring an increased risk of infectious complications. When rATG was used in obese and nonobese patients, there was no difference in graft and patient survival.     

Lower extremity arterial revascularization in obese patients

BACKGROUND: Obesity and associated comorbidities are associated with a high rate of complications and technical difficulties after a number of surgical procedures. We studied the role of obesity in outcomes in lower extremity arterial revascularization. METHODS: We reviewed all lower extremity arterial revascularizations performed at our institution in 2000. Body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 30 kg/m(2) defined obesity. Perioperative outcomes, long-term survival, and graft patency were evaluated in obese and nonobese patients by using linear regression, the Fisher exact test, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 74 (26%) obese and 207 (74%) nonobese patients. Patient demographics of the obese and nonobese populations were similar. The mean BMI for obese patients was 35 +/- 5 kg/m(2) and in nonobese patients was 25 +/- 3 kg/m(2). The mean age of each group was 67 +/- 10 years (BMI > or =30 kg/m(2)) and 70 +/- 13 years (BMI <30 kg/m(2)). There were 45 (61%) obese men and 29 (39%) obese women. There were 128 (62%) nonobese men and 79 (38%) nonobese women. Diabetes was present in 76% of the obese and 70% of the nonobese patients. Perioperative myocardial infarction, 30-day mortality, and rate of reoperation within 30 days were not significantly different. Obese patients had higher increased postoperative wound infection rates (16% vs 7%; P = .04). Survival analysis showed 81% +/- 5% and 85% +/- 3% 1-year survival and 66% +/- 6% and 62% +/- 3% 3-year survival in obese and nonobese patients (P = .58), respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed no effect of obesity on long-term graft patency, with 1-year graft patency rates of 82% +/- 6% and 81% +/- 4% in obese and nonobese patients, respectively (P = .79). CONCLUSIONS: Obese patients have similar limb salvage rates, perioperative cardiac morbidity, long-term survival rates, and long-term graft patency but have increased perioperative wound infections.     

Super Obesity Is an Independent Risk Factor for Complications After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Recent studies have reported higher postoperative complication rates in obese and morbidly obese patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Less data are available regarding super-obese (body mass index [BMI] >50 kg/m²) patients. This study aims to quantify the risk of complications after THA in super-obese patients on a national scale and to put these risks in context by comparing them to patients of other BMI classes as well as those undergoing revision THA.

Childhood obesity: a risk factor for injuries observed at a level-1 trauma center

Purpose

Obesity is an independent risk factor in trauma-related morbidity in adults. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of obesity in the pediatric trauma population.

Methods

All patients (6-20 years) between January 2004 and July 2007 were retrospectively reviewed and defined as non-obese (body mass index [BMI] <95th percentile for age) or obese (BMI ≥95th percentile for age). Groups were compared for differences in demographics, initial vital signs, mechanisms of injury, length of stay, intensive care unit stay, ventilator days, Injury Severity Score, operative procedures, and clinical outcomes.

Results

Of 1314 patients analyzed, there were 1020 (77%) nonobese patients (mean BMI = 18.8 kg/m²) and 294 (23%) obese patients (mean BMI = 29.7 kg/m²). There was no significant difference in sex, heart rate, length of stay, intensive care unit days, ventilator days, Injury Severity Score, and mortality between the groups. The obese children were significantly younger than the nonobese children (10.9 ± 3.3 vs 11.5 ± 3.5 years; P = .008) and had a higher systolic blood pressure during initial evaluation (128 ± 17 vs 124 ± 16 mm Hg, P < .001). In addition, the obese group had a higher incidence of extremity fractures (55% vs 40%; P < .001) and orthopedic surgical intervention (42% vs 30%; P < .001) but a lower incidence of closed head injury (12% vs 18%; P = .013) and intraabdominal injuries (6% vs 11%; P = .023). Evaluation of complications showed a higher incidence of decubitus ulcers (P = .043) and deep vein thrombosis (P = .008) in the obese group.

Conclusion

In pediatric trauma patients, obesity may be a risk factor for sustaining an extremity fracture requiring operative intervention and having a higher risk for certain complications (ie, deep venous thrombosis [DVT] and decubitus ulcers) despite having a lower incidence of intracranial and intraabdominal injuries. Results are similar to reports examining the effect(s) of obesity on the adult population.     

Increased early morbidity and mortality with acceptable long-term function in severely obese patients undergoing liver transplantation

The effect of obesity on outcomes following liver transplantation remains unclear. We reviewed our experience with 302 liver transplants in 277 patients from September 1989 to September 1996 to determine the effect of body mass on outcome. Two hundred and seventeen transplants were performed in patients with a body mass index (BMI)<30 kg/m², 55 in patients with a BMI of 30–34 kg/m² (obese), and 30 in patients with a BMI>35 kg/m² (severely obese). Non-weight related pre-operative demographics were similar between groups with the exception of an increased frequency of cryptogenic cirrhosis among the obese and severely obese patients. Intra-operative transfusion requirements were greater for the severely obese group (16.2±3.5 units versus 9.1±0.8 units for the non-obese, p=0.0004), though not when normalized to body weight (0.14±0.03 units/kg versus 0.13±0.01 units/kg, p>0.05). Post-operatively, severely obese patients had a higher rate of wound infection (20 versus 4%, p=0.0001) and death attributed to multisystem organ failure (15 versus 2%, p=0.0001), although overall mortality prior to discharge and total complications were not different between groups. Actual 1-yr graft survival showed a negative trend in the severely obese group (67 versus 81% for non-obese, p=0.07), but both 3-yr graft survival and patient survival were similar to non-obese patients (p=0.12 and 0.17, respectively by the Cox–Mantel test). Liver transplantation in severely obese patients is associated with wound infection and early death from multisystem organ failure, but has similar long-term outcomes when compared to non-obese controls.     

Obesity in kidney transplantation affects renal function but not graft and patient survival

Introduction

The number of overweight and obese patients undergoing renal transplantation has increased dramatically over the past two decades. Studies on graft survival and posttransplantation complications have often yielded conflicting results. Some authors have reported similar results for graft and patient survivals between obese and normal weight patients, but with a marginally increased rate of postoperative complications. In contrast, other reports note higher percentage of graft losses as well as increased mortality. In our study, we analyzed early- and long-term outcomes among obese versus nonobese kidney transplant recipients.

Patients and Methods

Between January 2000 and December 2008, we performed 563 cadaveric kidney transplantations. Recipients were classified in 1 of 5 groups based on their body mass index (BMI) at the time of transplantation: group A (n = 68; BMI < 18.5); group B (n = 310; 18.6 < BMI < 24.9); group C (n = 143; 25 < BMI < 29.9); group D (n = 32; 30 < BMI < 34.9); and group E (n = 10; BMI ≥ 35). The comparative analysis included patient and graft survivals, postoperative complications, onset of delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection episodes, hospital stay, and serum creatinine values in the first 3 years posttransplantation.

Results

At a mean follow-up of 53 months (range, 3-112 months), DGF was observed in 20 patients in group A (29.4%), 82 in group B (26.4%), 43 in group C (30%), 16 in group D (50%), and 4 in group E (40%). Nevertheless, obese patients (groups D and E) showed higher mean serum creatinine values and worse renal function at 6 months (P = .001), 1 year (P < .001), and 3 years (P = .001). Moreover, they were at increased risk of an acute rejection episode (P = .01) and more susceptible to cardiovascular and metabolic complications (P = .01). Morbidly obese patients displayed a higher incidence of postsurgical complications (P = .002). There were no differences in the incidences of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) or infectious complications. Despite the differences in morbidity among the 5 groups, we failed to observe significant differences in patient or graft survivals at 6, 12, 36, or 60 months.

Conclusion

Our findings suggested that obese patients should not be discriminated against simply based on the BMI. At our center, obese (BMI >35) transplantation candidates undergo a thorough cardiac evaluation, as well as pulmonary, endocrine, and nutritional counseling seeking to minimize medical and surgical complications and improve survival and quality of life.     

Influence of mild obesity on outcome of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation

The influence of body mass index (BMI) on outcome of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) has not been well described. We retrospectively reviewed 88 consecutive primary SPKs performed at our institution between March 15, 1995 and August 28, 2001. All patients received antibody induction and maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Systemicenteric implantation was performed in all patients. Primary end points were patient, pancreas, and kidney survival. Secondary end points were rates of anastomotic leakage, pancreas thrombosis, major infection, rejection, repeat laparotomy, and length of hospital stay. Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation, range, or percentage. Fifty-two patients (59.1%) were nonobese with a BMI ≦24.9 (mean 21.7 ± 2.2, range 15.4 to 24.9). Thirty-six patients were mild to moderately obese with a BMI ≧25 (mean 27.7 ± 2.2, range 25 to 35.1). Distribution of recipient age, sex, and ethnicity was similar between groups. Kidney and pancreas preservation times were similar between nonobese and obese patients. One-, three-, and five-year actuarial patient (nonobese: 95%, 95%, 95% vs. obese: 95%, 95%, 89%), kidney graft (nonobese: 91%, 91%, 87% vs. obese: 97%, 91%, 85%), and pancreas graft (nonobese: 78%, 78%, 73% vs. obese: 70%, 62%, 62%) survival were comparable between nonobese and obese (P = NS). The mean rates of pancreas thrombosis, major infection, pancreas rejection, kidney rejection, relaparotomy, and length of hospital stay were similar in the two groups. The overall duodenojejunal anastomotic leakage rate was 8%. Obese patients had a 17% incidence of leakage (6 of 36) compared to a 2% incidence of leakage in nonobese patients (P = 0.012). Six of seven leaks occurred in obese patients. Mean BMI in the seven patients with a leak (27 ± 1.9) was significantly higher than in patients who did not develop a leak (24 ± 3.7; P = 0.05). Although obesity had no effect on patient or graft survival, it was associated with a significantly higher leakage rate. There should therefore be a higher degree of suspicion for the presence of duodenojejunal anastomotic leaks in obese SPK recipients. Presented at the American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Congress, Miami, Florida, February 28, 2003.     

Does obesity increase early postoperative complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Results from a single center

Background

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCRS) has several advantages over open surgery, but LCRS has been associated with a higher rate of postoperative complications (POCs) among obese patients [body mass index (BMI), ≥30 kg/m²]. The prevalence of obesity in Chile is increasing, up to 25.1 % in 2010, suggesting that a higher percentage of patients undergoing LCRS will be obese. This study compared POC rates between obese and nonobese patients undergoing LCRS.

Methods

This study included case and control patients in a prospectively maintained LCRS database who underwent LCRS between July 2007 and June 2012 at Clinica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile. Obese and nonobese (BMI <30 kg/m²) patients were paired by gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, preoperative diagnosis, and type of surgery. Intraoperative complications and POCs were documented up to 30 days. The severity of each POC was classified by Clavien–Dindo score.

Results

In this study, 449 patients who underwent LCRS during the study period were identified. The study paired 53 obese patients (mean BMI 33.1 kg/m²) with 53 nonobese patients (mean BMI 25.9 kg/m²). The median age was 55 years in the obese group and 57 years in the nonobese group, and 60 % of the patients in both groups were men. The findings showed POCs in 13 obese (24.5 %) and 15 nonobese (28.3 %) patients (p = 0.66). Stratified by severity of POCs, the two groups were similar (p = 0.62). The two groups did not differ in terms of the median time to the first feeding (1 day each) or the hospital length of stay (4 days each). Similar percentages of patients in the two groups required reoperation (p = 0.4), intensive care unit (ICU) admission (p = 0.77), and readmission to the hospital (p = 0.65) because of POCs.

Conclusion

The frequency of POCs after LCRS was no higher among the obese patients than among the nonobese patients.     

Effect of Pretransplantation Body Mass Index on Allograft Function and Patient Survival After Renal Transplantation

We evaluated the effects of pretransplantation recipient body mass index (BMI) on allograft survival and on kidney function. Kidney transplant recipients were grouped according to their pretransplantation BMIs: Group I (BMI <18.5 kg/m²; n = 10); Group II (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m²; n = 62); Group III (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m²; n = 47); and Group IV (BMI >30.0 kg/m²; n = 16). Excellent 1-year patient and graft survival rates were observed in all groups. Increased BMI was associated with increased hypertension and longer hospital stays. The incidence of acute rejection episodes, slow graft function, and delayed graft function, as well as the need for antithymocyte globulin Fresenius (ATG-F) rescue therapy were comparable between the 4 patient groups. The 1-year glomerular filtration rate was markedly different between the 4 patient groups. The 1-year posttransplantation glucose level was higher among obese patients compared with the other groups. A multivariate regression analysis confirmed the association of a higher 1-year GFR with obesity (BMI >30.0 kg/m²). Overweight and obese recipients showed excellent long-term patient and graft survival rates. Accordingly, denying patients renal transplantation because of obesity may not be justified.     

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese and nonobese patients: Do differences in body mass indices lead to different outcomes?

Background The aim of this prospective study was to compare the outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese and nonobese patients.Methods All patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for both benign and malignant disease within the past 5 years were entered into the prospective database registry. Body mass index (BMI; kg/m²) was used as the objective measure to indicate morbid obesity. Patients with a BMI >30 were defined as obese, and patients with a BMI <30 were defined as nonobese. The parameters analyzed included age, gender, comorbid conditions, diagnosis, procedure, duration of surgery, transfusion requirements, conversion rate, overall morbidity rate including major complications (requiring reoperation), minor complications (conservative treatment) and late-onset complications (postdischarge), stay on intensive case unit, hospitalization, and mortality. For objective evaluation, only laparoscopically completed procedures were analyzed. Statistics included Students t test and chi-square analysis. Statistical significance was assessed at the 5% level (p < 0. 05 statistically significant).Results A total of 589 patients were evaluated, including 95 patients in the obese group and 494 patients in the nonobese group. There was no significant difference in conversion rate (7.3% in the obese group vs 9.5% in the nonobese group, p > 0.05) so that the laparoscopic completion rate was 90.5% (n = 86) in the obese and 92.7% (n = 458) in the nonobese group. The rate of females was significantly lower among obese patients (55.8% in the obese group vs 74.2% in the nonobese group, p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed with respect to age, diagnosis, procedure, duration of surgery, and transfusion requirements (p > 0.05). In terms of morbidity, there were no significant differences related to overall complication rates with respect to BMI (23.3% in the obese group vs 24.5% in the nonobese group, p > 0.05). Major complications were more common in the obese group without showing statistical significance (12.8% in the obese group vs 6.6% in the nonobese group, p = 0.078). Conversely, minor complications were more frequently documented in the nonobese group (8.1% in the obese group vs 15.5% in the nonobese group, p = 0.080). In the postoperative course, no differences were documented in terms of return of bowel function, duration of analgesics required, oral feeding, and length of hospitalization (p > 0.05).Conclusion These data indicate that laparoscopic colorectal surgery is feasible and effective in both obese and nonobese patients. Obese patients who are thought to be at increased risk of postoperative morbidity have the similar benefit of laparoscopic surgery as nonobese patients with colorectal disease.     

Obesity,Regardless of Comorbidity,Influences Outcomes After Colorectal Surgery—Time to Rethink the Pay-for-Performance Metrics?

An elevated body mass index (BMI) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality after colorectal surgery. While coexistent comorbid conditions are captured in some determinations of case-severity, BMI itself is not factored into pay for performance (P4P) initiatives. From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database 2006–2011, obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) and nonobese (BMI <30 kg/m²) patients with and without comorbidity undergoing colorectal resection were identified. Pre- and intraoperative factors as well as postoperative outcomes were compared. Of 130,415 patients, 31.3 % were obese. 80.4 % of obese and 72.9 % of nonobese patients had comorbid conditions. Among obese patients, overall rates of surgical site infection (SSI), wound dehiscence, and various medical complications were significantly higher for those with comorbidity compared to those without (p?相似文献   

The impact of obesity on severely injured children and adolescents

Purpose/Background

In conjunction with the obesity epidemic in adults, we are starting to see an increase of obesity in children and adolescents. Obesity has been identified as risk factor for poor outcomes in adult trauma patients, but has not been investigated adequately in younger patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of obesity on the outcomes of a severely injured population of children and adolescents.

Methods

Retrospective review of traumatized children (age 6-12) and adolescents (age 13-19) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at an urban, level I trauma center from 1998 to 2003. The trauma registry and ICU database were used for data acquisition. Height and weight were recorded for each patient upon admission to the ICU and used to calculate body mass index (BMI). Patients were categorized as either lean (BMI <95th percentile for age) or obese (BMI ≥95th percentile for age). The two groups were compared regarding admission demographics, vital signs, mechanism of injury, patterns of injury, Injury Severity Score, and operations required. Outcomes evaluated were need for and length of mechanical ventilation, complications, length of hospital and ICU stay, and mortality.

Results

There were 316 pediatric and adolescent trauma patients (262 [83%] lean, mean BMI = 23 kg/m² and 54 [17%] obese, mean BMI = 33 kg/m²) admitted to the ICU. The lean and obese groups were similar regarding age, sex, mechanism of injury, admission vitals, injury severity, and operations required. Injury patterns were similar, except obese patients had less severe head injuries. Although there was no difference in mortality among obese (15%) and non-obese (9%) patients (P = .39), obese children did have more complications (41% vs 22%, P = .04). In addition, obese patients required longer ICU stays (8 ± 9 vs 6 ± 6 days, P = .05) after severe trauma.

Conclusions

Despite similar admission characteristics and less severe head injuries, obese children and adolescents have more complications and require longer ICU stays than their lean counterparts.     

Pancreas transplantation considering the spectrum of body mass indices

Afaneh C, Rich B, Aull MJ, Hartono C, Kapur S, Leeser DB. Pancreas transplantation considering the spectrum of body mass indices.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: E520–E529. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: In kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplantation, extremes of body mass index (BMI) have been reported to influence post‐operative outcomes and even survival. Given the limited data in pancreas transplantation, we sought to elucidate the influence of BMI on outcomes. Methods: We reviewed 139 consecutive pancreas transplants performed at our institution and divided them into four categories based on BMI: underweight (≤18.5 kg/m²), normal (18.6–24.9 kg/m²), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m²), and obese (≥30 kg/m²). Parameters analyzed included post‐operative complications, early graft loss, one‐yr acute rejection rate (AR), non‐surgical infections, and survival. Results: Demographic data were similar between the groups. Compared with normal, only obese patients trended toward more post‐operative complications (p = 0.06). Underweight and obese patients had significantly more post‐operative infectious complications than normal (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.03, respectively). Obese patients had more complications requiring percutaneous drainage compared with normal (p = 0.03). Overweight and obese patients had significantly more complications requiring re‐laparotomy (p = 0.03 and p = 0.048, respectively). Early graft loss, AR, non‐surgical infections, and patient and graft survival rates were not different between normal and underweight, overweight, or obese patients (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Extremes of BMI were associated with increased morbidity. Donors and recipients should be carefully selected to maximize potential for successful outcomes.     

Body Mass Index in the First Year After Kidney Transplantation

Introduction

Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) experience better appetite, partly due to the use of steroids, and are subjected to less severe dietetic restrictions, hence they tend to increase the uptake of calories, which favors weight gain posttransplantation. In this study, we evaluate the profile of body mass index (BMI) in the first year posttransplantation.

Methods

This was a retrospective study including 131 patients who received transplants between 1991 and 2011. We collected demographic and clinical data such as body weight and height, and calculated BMI pretransplantation and at 6 and 12 months posttransplantation.

Results

Mean age was 47.1 ± 13.1 years, 64.9% were male, and 29% of patients were diabetic. Pretransplantation mean BMI was 23.04 ± 4.08 kg/m², and at 6 and 12 months posttransplantation it increased to 24.55 ± 4.2 kg/m² and 24.65 ± 4.16 kg/m², respectively (P < .001). At 6 months, this significant weight gain occurred in all patients, even those malnourished, eutrophic, overweight, and obese at pretransplantation. Looking at pretransplantation malnourished patients, 30.8% remained malnourished 1 year after transplantation. Otherwise, 28.6% of pretransplantation overweight patients and 100% of pretransplantation obese patients could be classified as obese at 1 year posttransplantation.

Conclusions

Increase in BMI is common in obese and nonobese KTR. This study highlights the importance of identifying subjects at risk for excessive weight gain posttransplantation, thus allowing an early nutritional intervention to prevent its complications.     

Obesity predicts increased overall complications following pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the role of recipient body mass index (BMI) on postoperative complications in patients receiving pancreas transplants. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective study of 145 consecutive patients undergoing either simultaneous kidney pancreas (SPK) or pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation from January 1997 through December 2003. Variables analyzed included: age, sex, BMI, number of prior transplants, cytomegalovirus status of donor and recipient, postoperative insulin resistance, complications, and overall patient and graft survival. Differences in continuous variables and dichotomous variables were evaluated using two-tailed t test and Fisher exact test, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify predictors of overall complications following surgery. RESULTS: Obesity was defined by a BMI > or = 30. Of the 145 patients, 33 (23%) had a BMI > or = 30 and 112 (77%) had a BMI < 30. There was no significant difference in age or sex between obese and nonobese patients (P = .98 and P = .56, respectively). The type of transplantation, SPK or PAK, did not affect the complication rate (P = .36). Overall complications (infection, dehiscence, evisceration, ventral hernia, allograft failure, gangrene, necrotizing fasciitis, postoperative bleeding, or death) were significantly higher in the obese group (81% vs 40%, P < .001). Obesity was specifically associated with increased frequency of dehiscence, ventral hernia, intra-abdominal infection, gangrene, necrotizing fasciitis, and repeat laparotomy. Obese patients also had a threefold higher rate of graft pancreatitis/enteric leak. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age > or = 50 and BMI > or = 30 as independent predictors of overall complications following surgery (odds ratio 4.0, P = .014 and OR 6.8, P < .001, respectively). There was no difference identified between groups with regards to allograft failure, posttransplant insulin resistance, and death. CONCLUSION: Obese patients are at increased risk of overall complications following pancreas transplantation. Specifically, obese patients experience higher frequency of dehiscence, ventral hernia, intra-abdominal infection, gangrene, and necrotizing fasciitis. This study demonstrates the need for careful postoperative monitoring in the obese patient.