Toward further expansion of the organ pool for adult liver recipients: splitting the cadaveric liver into right and left lobes

BACKGROUND: Current methods of living donor right lobe transplantation can be expanded for use in the cadaveric setting. The aim of this study is to discuss alternative methods for the management of large-for-size cadaveric livers and determine the feasibility of splitting these organs into left and right hemi-livers using similar techniques to those used in the living donor setting. METHODS: The indication for an in situ right-left split procedure was an offer of a large liver for a small recipient with a recipient-donor ratio of greater than 1.5. A total of three livers were split. Mean donor age was 33.3 (range, 22-40) years. Mean weight was 118 (range, 90-150) kg. All donors were without significant medical history and were hemodynamically stable, with normal liver function and short hospital stay. Mean duration of the procurement procedure was 235 (range, 210-270) min. Mean cold ischemia time was 8.5 hr. Mean recipient weight was 58.3 kg, and mean donor to recipient weight ratio was 2.0 (1.6-2.6). United Network for Organ Sharing statuses at the time of transplantation were 1 (n=1), 2A (n=1), and 2B (n=4). RESULTS: Immediate graft function was seen in five recipients. Delayed nonfunction was identified in one recipient of a left lobe, who did not undergo transplantation because of sepsis that resulted in death at 30 days. A second mortality occurred in a left lobe recipient, from a fungal brain abscess at 90 days. Complications related to the split included bile leaks in two patients, one necessitating operative revision. CONCLUSIONS: Splitting of livers from appropriate brain-dead donors into right and left lobes is technically and logistically feasible. The large-for-size organ provides a more substantial amount of liver tissue to each of the adult recipients, which may result in a greater graft to recipient weight ratio than the current standard that is used in the living donor grafting. The importance of this variable will need to be studied, because it may positively impact on the ability of the reduced-size graft to withstand donor-related organ system stress and injury, which is associated with brain death and the inevitable longer period of cold preservation.     

In situ splitting of the cadaveric liver for two adult recipients.

BACKGROUND: Split-liver transplantation offers a unique opportunity to expand the existing donor pool. However, it has previously been stated that due to inadequate liver volume the advantages of split-liver transplantation would be lost when attempting to split the liver for two adult recipients. In this study, we sought to determine the safety, efficacy, and applicability of split-liver transplantation in select adult liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Liver allografts for eight adult recipients were procured by in situ splitting of four adult cadaveric livers. The donor ages were 17, 19, 22, and 25 years and weights were 72, 77, 78, and 87 kg, respectively. In situ splitting resulted in three right trisegmental grafts, one right lobe graft, one left lobe graft, and three left lateral segmental grafts. The median recipient age was 49 years (range 38-61 years), whereas the median recipient weight was 84 kg (range 78-98 kg) for the right-sided grafts and 52 kg (range 51-53 kg) for recipients of the left-sided grafts. The median graft-to-recipient body weight ratio for right trisegmental, right lobe, left lobe, and left lateral segmental grafts was 1.31%, 1.26%, 1.35%, and 0.70%, respectively. RESULTS: Overall patient and graft survival in this series is 100%. All prothrombin times were normalized within 4 days of transplantation. No evidence of ascites or prolonged hyperbilirubinemia was encountered in any right- or left-sided graft recipient. The incidence of hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein thrombosis is 0%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. Hepatic arterial anastomotic bleeding and a cut surface bile leak each occurred in one patient. Median United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) waiting time was 242 days (range 4-454 days) for the patients to which the donor liver was allocated. In contrast, the median waiting time for the four patients receiving the extra split-liver graft was reduced significantly to 37 days (range 21-101 days) (P<0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that split-liver transplantation can expand the cadaveric donor liver pool available for select adult liver transplant recipients. When both the donor organ and the transplant recipient are chosen carefully, split-liver transplantation can be safely performed without a delay in allograft function, increase in technical complications, or compromise in graft or patient survival.     

Two steps liver resection with right portal vein ligation for two giant hemangiomas of the left and right lobes

The liver failure is one of the most life threatening complication after extensive liver resections. In resections that exceed 70% of liver parenchyma, a two steps approach with portal branch ligation is the best alternative. The aim of the paper is to present the management of a 65-year-old female admitted into hospital for two giant symptomatic liver hemangiomas in the left lobe: segment III-20 cm. and in the right lobe: segments V-VIII-19 cm, which were non-resectable in the same intervention because the small amount of liver parenchyma left, and for these we decided a two steps surgery: left atypical resection with right portal vein ligation in the first step, attending 4 month for atrophy-hypertrophy process, and then right typical hepatectomy for second hemangioma who practically occupied all right liver. The postoperative course, was favorable after both interventions, with 7 days postsurgery hospitalisation, despite some hepatic failure symptoms: coagulation disturbance, increasing of bilirubin and ALAT, ASAT levels, ascites.     

Transplantation of pediatric cadaveric kidneys into adult or pediatric recipients

In Japan, nationwide cadaveric organ sharing for kidney transplantation by the Japan Organ Transplant Network (JOTN) has operated since April 1995. This study retrospectively analyzed the long-term results of single pediatric donor kidneys transplanted into adult or pediatric recipients at a single center. From March 1983 to December 2002, 281 cadaveric renal allografts were transplanted at our center, including, 17 recipients of cadaveric kidneys from donors aged less than 16 years. We divided these 17 recipients into two groups: 10 adult recipients (group 1; G1) and seven pediatric recipients (group 2; G2). HLA-AB, -DR mismatches were 1.3 +/- 1.3, 0.7 +/- 0.5 in G1 and 2.6 +/- 1.3, 1.4 +/- 0.8 in G2, respectively (P < .05 for both). The end of the observation of this study was March 2003. Among G1, two recipients died with functioning grafts and one died after graft loss. Among G2, no recipients died. Patient survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 90% and 80% in G1 and 100% and 100% in G2, respectively. At the end of the observation in this study, five recipients among G1 and six recipients among G2 had functioning grafts. Graft survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 90% and 80% in G1 and 85.7% and 85.7% in G2, respectively. Our results demonstrate that transplantation of pediatric cadaveric kidneys into pediatric recipients was excellent compared to adult recipients in terms of survival. Priority to pediatric patients should be given especially in cases of pediatric donors.     

In situ split liver transplantation for two adult recipients

BACKGROUND: Modifications of the in situ split liver technique are needed for safe transplantation in two adult recipients with a single donor. METHODS: The graft from a brain-dead donor, 187 cm tall and weighing 89 kg, was split in situ with a transection performed along the main portal fissure retaining the middle hepatic vein with the left graft. The right and left grafts, which weighed 985 and 760 g, respectively, were transplanted in two adult recipients weighing 70 and 56 kg, respectively. RESULTS: Both recipients had minor intraoperative blood loss and were discharged from intensive care on day 3. Both grafts were rapidly functional, and the two patients were in excellent condition with normal liver function tests 9 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: In situ split liver transplantation can be performed with the middle hepatic vein retained in the left graft to obtain a sufficient volume of the two grafts suitable for two adult recipients. This modification of the technique could expand the donor pool for adult recipients.     

Splitting liver transplantation. Orthotopic liver transplantation in two recipients with a single donor liver

Surgical reduction of donor livers to treat small children has been performed successfully in several centers. While this procedure improves the allocation of livers, it does not increase the organ supply. Since either lobe can be used in preparing a reduced-size graft, both lobes can become grafts, if acceptable vascular pedicles and bile ducts can be established for each one. We report and demonstrate a technique, in which a donor liver has been split and was used to transplant in two recipients.     

肝移植术后受者并发急性左心功能衰竭的危险因素和预防措施

目的分析肝移植术后受者并发急性左心功能衰竭的危险因素，并总结其预防措施。方法回顾性分析230例肝移植受者的临床资料，其中16例术后发生急性左心功能衰竭。将受者分成左心功能衰竭组和心功能正常组，对22项肝移植术后并发急性左心功能衰竭的指标进行了单因素分析，采用Χ^2检验或t检验，将差异有统计学意义的因素纳入多因素模型进行Logistic回归分析，针对危险因素总结预防措施。结果单因素分析结果显示，心脏病史、肝功能分级、术中输血量、术后日平均液体平衡量及术后并发肾功能衰竭是发生急性左心功能衰竭的相关因素（P〈0．05）；多因素分析结果显示，肝功能分级、术中输血量、术后日平均液体平衡量及术后并发肾功能衰竭是急性左心功能衰竭的独立危险因素（P〈0．05）。结论肝移植术后受者并发急性左心功能衰竭是多种因素引起的；应在肝移植术前、术中及术后采取综合性预防措施。     

Magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic islets transplanted into the right liver lobes of diabetic mice

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic islets (PI) labeled with Feridex can be visualized using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after transplantation into the liver. However, there is still no accurate method of quantifying the signal loss caused by the iron contrast agent within transplanted tissue. The aim of this study was to test a new method for quantifying signal loss during the early posttransplantation period. METHODS: Isolated mouse PI (C57BL/6 and BALB/c) were labeled in CMRL-1066 culture media supplemented with Feridex. Two hundred twenty PI were injected directly into the right liver lobes of BALB/c diabetic (streptozotocine 220 mg/kg) recipients (isografts, n = 3; allografts, n = 3). Animals were scanned at 3 T, on a whole body scanner equipped with a high-performance gradient insert and using the 3D FIESTA sequence, on days 1, 7, and 14. Signal loss was quantified by comparison of liver tissue with and without labeled PI. Signal loss detected on the first scan was rated as 100% and subsequent measurements were recalculated as relative numbers. RESULTS: While the function of the isografts remained stable throughout the study, the allografts failed on days 5 and 10. A decrease in the amount of signal loss was observed in all animals and was comparable after the first week in both groups. However, there was a difference between groups after the second week (mean +/- SD; isografts, 100% --> 61.8 +/- 6.74% --> 47.18 +/- 7.14%; allografts, 100% --> 59.39 +/- 8.54% --> 38.16 +/- 6.81%). CONCLUSION: Disappearance of signal loss is comparable in all animals during the first week and seems to be independent of acute rejection.     

Comparison of two techniques of arterial anastomosis during adult cadaveric liver transplantation

Arterial complications are a major source of morbidity and mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) ranges from 1.6% to 8%, with a mortality rate that ranges from 11% to 35%. We have described herein a technique of arterial anastomosis aiming to perform the anastomosis as straight as possible to avoid any kinking, redundancy, or malposition of the artery when the liver is released in its final position. We compared this technique with the traditional technique of arterial anastomosis using an aortic Carrel patch, namely, 198 OLT (group A) with the traditional technique and 117 OLT (group B) with the modified technique. An aorto-hepatic bypass was necessary in 25% of the cases in group A and in 21% of the cases in group B (P = .33). Vascular anomalies were present in 20% of cases in group A and in 27.5% in group B (P = .14). Fourteen cases (7%) of HAT developed in group A versus 0 cases in group B (P = .003). In group B, we experienced 2 (1.7%) late arterial stenoses that were successfully treated using percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. The 14 cases of HAT occurring in group A were successfully managed using immediate surgical revascularization with graft salvage in 6 cases (43%), whereas the remaining 8 cases needed urgent retransplantation. We suggest that a technique of arterial anastomosis aimed at avoiding kinking, redundancy, or malposition of the artery may be a viable option to reduce the risk of HAT after OLT.     

A case report of split liver transplantation for two adult recipients in Korea

We report a case of split liver transplantation (SLT) for two adult recipients, which was the first successful case in Korea. The brain-dead donor was a 22-year-old man weighing 65 kg, but his liver volume was estimated as 2120 mL on computed tomographic volumetry. As it seemed to be too large for a 60-kg recipient candidate, SLT was planned after assessment of lobar liver volume and middle hepatic vein anatomy. The right lobe was mobilized first and the liver parenchyma transected along the right border of the middle hepatic vein. The 1240-g right lobe (segments 5 to 8) graft was implanted into a 57-year-old male patient with acute-on-chronic liver failure in the same manner as a living-donor graft. After that, routine procedures of cadaveric multiorgan procurement were performed. The 670-g left lobe (segments 1 to 4) with a retrohepatic vena cava, common bile duct, and aortic patch was implanted into another 37-year-old male recipient. These two recipients recovered uneventfully surviving 12 months to date. We integrated the surgical techniques learned from hundreds of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplants into this first trial of two adult SLT.     

Determinants of hospital mortality of adult recipients of right lobe live donor liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE: To define the technical factors that might contribute to hospital mortality of recipients of right lobe live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) so as to perfect the design of the operation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Right lobe LDLT has been accepted as one of the treatments for patients with terminal hepatic failure, but the design and results of the reported series vary and the technical factors affecting hospital mortality have not been known. METHODS: The data of 100 adult-to-adult right lobe LDLT performed between 1996 and 2002 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. All grafts except one contained the middle hepatic vein, which was anastomosed to the recipient middle/left hepatic vein in the first 84 recipients and directly into the inferior vena cava (with the right hepatic vein in form of venoplasty) in the subsequent 15 patients. Venovenous bypass was used routinely in the first 29 patients but not subsequently. RESULTS: Eight patients died within the same hospital admission for liver transplantation. There was no hospital mortality in the last 53 recipients. Comparison of data of patients with or without hospital mortality showed that graft weight/body weight ratio, graft weight/estimated standard liver weight ratio, technical error resulting in occlusion/absence of the middle hepatic vein, use of venovenous bypass, the lowest body temperature recorded during surgery, the volume of intraoperative blood transfusion, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet infusion were significantly different between the two groups. However, the pretransplant intensive care unit status of the recipients, cold and warm ischemic time of the graft, and occurrence of biliary complications were not. By multivariate analysis, low body temperature recorded during operation, low graft weight/estimated standard liver weight ratio (35% of the estimated standard graft weight may be sufficient for recipient survival. Hypothermia, which predisposes to coagulopathy and is enhanced by the use of venovenous bypass and massive blood, and blood product transfusion must be avoided.     

Nomogram for predicting the likelihood of delayed graft function in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients

Delayed graft function (DGF) is the need for dialysis in the first week after transplantation. Studied were risk factors for DGF in adult (age >/=16 yr) cadaveric renal transplant recipients by means of a multivariable modeling procedure. Only donor and recipient factors known before transplantation were chosen so that the probabilities of DGF could be calculated before transplantation and appropriate preventative measures taken. Data on 19,706 recipients of cadaveric allografts were obtained from the United States Renal Data System registry (1995 to 1998). Graft losses within the first 24 h after surgery were excluded from the analysis (n = 89). Patients whose DGF information was missing or unknown (n = 2820) and patients missing one or more candidate predictors (n = 2951) were also excluded. By means of a multivariable logistic regression analysis, factors contributing to DGF in the remaining 13,846 patients were identified. After validating the logistic regression model, a nomogram was developed as a tool for identifying patients at risk for DGF. The incidence of DGF was 23.7%. Sixteen independent donor or recipient risk factors were found to predict DGF. A nomogram quantifying the relative contribution of each risk factor was created. This index can be used to calculate the risk of DGF for an individual by adding the points associated with each risk factor. The nomogram provides a useful tool for developing a pretransplantation index of the likelihood of DGF occurrence. With this index in hand, better informed treatment and allocation decisions can be made.     

Living donor liver transplant recipients achieve relatively higher immunosuppressant blood levels than cadaveric recipients

Two recent brief reports suggest that recipients of living donor liver transplants achieve higher levels of immunosuppressive agents than cadaveric (CAD) liver transplant recipients administered the same dose. These results could have important implications regarding the dosing of immunosuppressives in living donor liver transplant recipients. We report our findings relative to immunosuppressive doses and levels in a cohort of 46 living donor liver transplant recipients. Immunosuppressive blood levels and doses were recorded weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 and months 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 for 46 living donor liver transplant recipients and 66 matched CAD liver transplant recipients who underwent transplantation between August 1997 and May 2001. The ratio of level to dose also was recorded at each interval. The mean overall cyclosporine A dose was similar in living donor liver transplant recipients (323 mg/d) compared with CAD recipients (344 mg/d; P = not significant [NS]). The mean overall tacrolimus dose was 15% lower in patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT; 5.7 mg/d) than CAD transplantation (6.7 mg/d), although statistical significance was not achieved (P = .08). The mean overall cyclosporine A level was 18% higher in those undergoing LDLT (275 ng/mL) than CAD transplantation (234 ng/mL; P = .015). The mean overall tacrolimus level was the same in living donor liver transplant recipients (10.8 ng/mL) and CAD recipients (10.2 ng/mL; P = NS). The overall cyclosporine A level-dose ratio was 26% higher for those undergoing LDLT (0.83) than CAD transplantation (0.66; P = .01). The overall tacrolimus level-dose ratio was 26% higher for those undergoing LDLT (1.82) than CAD transplantation (1.44; P = .01). In conclusion, (1) living donor liver transplant recipients achieve higher blood levels of tacrolimus and cyclosporine A for a given dose compared with CAD recipients, and (2) this difference is observed up to 6 months after transplantation, when hepatic regeneration is completed. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:212-218.)     

Donor morbidity associated with right lobectomy for living donor liver transplantation to adult recipients: A systematic review

The aim if this study is to determine donor morbidity associated with right lobectomy for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to adult recipients through a systematic review of the published literature. Data sources were English-language reports on donor outcome after LDLT. MEDLINE (1995 to June 2001) was searched using the MeSH terms [ldquo ]living donors[rdquo ] and [ldquo ]liver transplantation.[rdquo ] Limits were set for human only and English language only. Bibliographies of retrieved references were cross-checked to identify additional reports; 211 reports were obtained. Population studies and consecutive and nonconsecutive series were included. All studies reported at least one of the following outcomes specific to living donors (LDs) of right hepatic lobes to adult recipients: surgical and hospital complications, length of hospital stay, readmissions, recovery time, return to predonation occupation, health-related quality of life, or mortality. Abstracts of relevant articles were reviewed independently using predetermined criteria, and appropriate articles were retrieved. Study design and results were summarized in evidence tables. Summary statistics of combined data were performed when possible. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Data on donor morbidity associated with right lobectomy are limited. On the basis of reported data, morbidity associated with LD right lobectomy ranges from 0% to 67%. In conclusion, reported morbidity associated with right lobe donation for LDLT varies widely. Standardized definitions of morbidity and better methods for observing and measuring outcomes are necessary to understand and potentially improve morbidity. Future studies assessing LD outcomes should report donor outcome more explicitly. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:110-117.)