Rectal Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in the Management of the Third Stage of Labour

ObjectiveTo compare the effect of rectal misoprostol with intramuscular oxytocin in the routine management of the third stage in a rural developing country.MethodsA randomized controlled trial was performed at two district hospitals in Ghana, West Africa. Four hundred fifty women in advanced labour were enrolled. The only exclusion criterion was a known medical contraindication to prostaglandin administration. Women were randomized to receive rectal misoprostol 800 μg or intramuscular oxytocin 10 IU with delivery of the anterior shoulder. The main outcome measure was change in hemoglobin concentration from before to after delivery. Secondary outcomes included the need for additional uterotonics, estimated blood loss, transfusion, and medication side effects.ResultsDemographic characteristics were similar in each treatment group. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in change in hemoglobin (misoprostol 1.19 g/dL and oxytocin 1.16 g/dL; relative difference 2.6%; 95% confidence intervals [CI]-16.8% to 19.4%; P = 0.80). The only significant secondary outcome was shivering, which was more common in the misoprostol group (misoprostol 7.5% vs. oxytocin 0.9%; relative risk 8.0; 95% CI 1.86—34.36; P = 0.001).ConclusionRectal misoprostol 800 μg is as effective as 10 IU intramuscular oxytocin in minimizing blood loss in the third stage of labour. Rectal misoprostol has a lower incidence of side effects than the equivalent oral dose. This confirms the utility of misoprostol as a safe and effective uterotonic for use in the rural and remote areas of developing nations where other pharmacologic agents may be less feasible.     

A double-blind placebo controlled randomised trial of misoprostol and oxytocin in the management of the third stage of labour

Objective To compare oral misoprostol 400 μg with intramuscular oxytocin 10 IU in the routine management of the third stage.
Design Double-blind placebo controlled trial.
Setting Main referral hospital and its associated polyclinics in Accra, Ghana.
Population Four hundred and one low risk women, in the second stage of labour with anticipated vaginal delivery, who entered labour spontaneously.
Methods After delivery of the anterior shoulder of the baby, the women were randomised to receive either: 1. misoprostol 400 μg powder in water orally and 1 mL normal saline intramuscular injection (placebo); or 2. powdered cellulose in water orally (placebo) and 1 mL oxytocin 10 IU intramuscular injection.
Main outcome measures Change in haemoglobin concentration from before delivery to 12 hours postpartum. Secondary outcomes included need for additional oxytocics, blood loss > 500 mL and > 1000 mL, operative intervention for postpartum haemorrhage, and side effects, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, shivering and elevated temperature.
Results Demographic characteristics were similar. There was no significant difference in change in haemoglobin concentration between the two groups (0.60 g/dL for misoprostol and 0.55 g/dL for oxytocin; relative difference 9.6%; 95% CI 20.5–39.6%;   P = 0.54  ). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes with the exception of shivering, which occurred more frequently in the misoprostol group (22.2% vs 5.7%; relative risk 4.73; 95% CI 2.31–9.68;   P < 0.0001  ).
Conclusions In low risk women oral misoprostol appears to be as effective in minimising blood loss in the third stage of labour as intramuscular oxytocin. Shivering was noted more frequently with misoprostol use, but no other side effects were noted. Misoprostol has great potential for use in the third stage of labour especially in developing countries.     

Misoprostol dose-related shivering and pyrexia in the third stage of labour

Objective To select the misoprostol dose to be used in a large multicentre randomised trial comparing misoprostol with oxytocin in the routine management of the third stage of labour.
Design Randomised pilot trial, double-blinded with the use of double placebos.
Setting Two of the nine hospitals that will participate in the main multicentre trial. The hospitals were
Population Women during second stage of labour about to be delivered vaginally.
Methods located in Johannesburg, South Africa and Khon Kaen, Thailand. The trial had three arms: misoprostol 400 μg versus misoprostol 600 μg versus intramuscular oxytocin 10 IU. Each group received an injection and three tablets immediately after the birth of the baby.
Main outcome measures Shivering and pyrexia rates were the main outcome measures. Data on other side effects and characteristics of the third stage of labour were also collected. Side effects were noted as none, mild, moderate or severe.
Results Both shivering and pyrexia (temperature > 38°C) were most common in the 600 μg misoprostol group (28% and 7.5% for shivering and pyrexia, respectively) compared with 400 μg misoprostol (19% and 2%), and the oxytocin group (12.5% and 3%). The increase in shivering in the misoprostol 600 pg group was due primarily to a higher rate of moderate shivering. None of the women had a temperature > 40°C. There were no increases in severe side effects and other adverse events in the misoprostol 600 μg group.
Conclusions When used in the management of the third stage of labour oral misoprostol is associated with an increase in the rate of moderate shivering and pyrexia which seems to be dose-related. Based on the results of this pilot trial, the Steering Committee has decided to use 600 μg misoprostol in the main trial, comparing it with oxytocin, in order to achieve higher effectiveness.     

Is rectal misoprostol really effective in the treatment of third stage of labor? A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare misoprostol 600 microg intrarectally with conventional oxytocics in the treatment of third stage of labor. STUDY DESIGN: In a controlled trial, 1606 women were randomly grouped to receive (1) oxytocin 10 IU plus rectal misoprostol, (2) rectal misoprostol, (3) oxytocin 10 IU, and (4) oxytocin 10 IU plus methylergometrine. The main outcome measures were the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and a drop in hemoglobin concentration from before delivery to 24 hours after delivery. RESULTS: The incidence of postpartum hemorrhage was 9.8% in the group that received only rectal misoprostol therapy compared with 3.5% in the group that received oxytocin and methylergometrine therapy (P =.001). There were no significant differences among the 4 groups with regard to a drop in hemoglobin concentrations. Significantly more women needed additional oxytocin in the group that received only rectal misoprostol therapy, when compared with the group that received oxytocin and methylergometrine therapy (8.3% vs 2.2%; P <.001). The primary outcome measures were similar in the group that received only rectal misoprostol therapy and the group that received only oxytocin therapy. CONCLUSION: Rectal misoprostol is significantly less effective than oxytocin plus methylergometrine for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage.     

Misoprostol is more efficacious for labor induction than prostaglandin E2 , but is it associated with more risk?

Objective: Our purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of misoprostol with dinoprostone (Prepidil) for labor induction. Study Design: In a randomized, controlled trial of labor induction, patients were randomly assigned to receive either 50 μg of intravaginal misoprostol every 4 hours or 0.5 mg of intracervical prostaglandin E₂ every 6 hours. Eligibility criteria included gestation of ≥31 weeks, Bishop score <6, and fewer than 12 contractions per hour. Primary outcomes were cesarean section, induction to delivery time, oxytocin use, and fetal distress requiring delivery. Results: One hundred fifty-nine women were randomly assigned to receive misoprostol (n = 81) or Prepidil (n = 78). There were no differences in the indication for induction, preinduction Bishop score, epidural use, or cesarean section rate. Mean time to delivery was significantly shorter in the misoprostol group (19 hours 50 minutes) than in the Prepidil group (28 hours 52 minutes) (P = .005). Only 58% of women in the misoprostol group required oxytocin augmentation, in comparison with 88% of women receiving Prepidil (P = .00002). However, 41% of women receiving misoprostol and 17% receiving Prepidil had late decelerations or bradycardias (P = .001), and 20% of the misoprostol group and 5% of the Prepidil group had deliveries for fetal distress (P = .05). Conclusions: Misoprostol is more efficacious than Prepidil for labor induction. However, the significantly increased incidence of abnormal fetal heart rate tracings and the trend in increased deliveries for fetal distress with misoprostol dosing of 50 μg every 4 hours are of concern. These data suggest that either a lower dose of misoprostol or less frequent dosing of misoprostol should be considered. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:1543-50.)     

A Comparative Study of Oxytocin/Misoprostol/Methylergometrine for Active Management of the Third Stage of Labor

Objectives

To study oxytocin, misoprostol, and methylergometrine in active management of the third stage of labor and determine duration of the third stage of labor, blood loss, adverse effects, and need for additional uterotonics in each group.

Methods

Clinical trial of 300 women with healthy singleton pregnancy allocated into three groups to receive either: 10 IU intravenous oxytocin infusion, 600 μg sublingual misoprostol, or 200 μg intravenous methylergometrine. Primary outcome measure was blood loss in the third stage of labor; secondary measures were duration of the third stage, side effects, and complications.

Results

Subjects who received 600 μg of misoprostol had the least blood loss, followed by oxytocin, and methylergometrine. The shortest mean duration of the third stage was with misoprostol. Shivering and pyrexia were observed in misoprostol group, and raised blood pressure in methylergometrine group.

Conclusions

Misoprostol is as effective as oxytocin and both are more effective than methylergometrine in active management of the third stage of labor.     

Role of Misoprostol 600 mcg Oral in Active Management of Third Stage of Labor: A Comparative Study with Oxytocin 10 IU i.m

Objectives

To compare oral misopostol 600 mcg with 10 IU units oxytocin i.m. in the active management of the third stage of labor.

Materials and Methods

A total of 200 pregnant women of 34–42 weeks of gestation delivering vaginally in the Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, were selected for study. Hundred women received oral misoprostol 600 mg and 100 women received i.m. oxytocin 10 IU immediately after delivery of the baby and cord clamping by the method of randomization.

Results

In the misoprostol group, mean blood loss is 145 ml, mean duration of the third stage of labor is 3.76 min, and mean fall in hemoglobin is 0.55 g/dl. In the oxytocin group, mean blood loss in 125.6 ml, mean duration of the third stage of labor in 3.50 min, and mean fall in hemoglobin is 0.48 g/dl. There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to the above-mentioned factors. There were 8 cases of PPH in the misoprostol group and 6 cases in the oxytocin group. Twenty-two cases in the misoprostol group and 16 cases in the oxytocin group required additional oxytocics. Adverse effects like shivering and pyrexia were more in the misoprostol group.

Conclusion

Oral misoprostol is as effective as oxytocin in AMTSL and can be used safely in vaginal deliveries for prevention of PPH, especially in non-institutional deliveries and in places of low resource settings.     

A randomised trial of carbetocin versus syntometrine in the management of the third stage of labour

OBJECTIVE: Syntometrine is an effective uterotonic agent used in preventing primary postpartum haemorrhage but has adverse effects including nausea, vomiting, hypertension and coronary artery spasm. Carbetocin is a newly developed long-acting oxytocin analogue that might be used as an uterotonic agent. We compare the efficacy and safety of intramuscular (IM) carbetocin with IM syntometrine in preventing primary postpartum haemorrhage. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Delivery suite of a university-based obstetrics unit. POPULATION: Women with singleton pregnancy achieving vaginal delivery after and throughout 34 weeks. METHODS: Three hundred and twenty-nine eligible women were randomised to receive either a single dose of 100 microgram IM carbetocin or 1 ml IM syntometrine (a mixture of 5 iu oxytocin and 0.5 mg ergometrine) at the end of second stage of labour. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Difference in haemoglobin drop measured 2 days after delivery between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in the drop of haemoglobin concentration within the first 48 hours between the two groups. The incidence of additional oxytocic injections, postpartum haemorrhage (blood loss > or = 500 ml) and retained placenta were also similar. The use of carbetocin was associated with significant lower incidence of nausea (relative risk [RR] 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.78), vomiting (RR 0.1, 95% CI 0.01-0.74), hypertension 30 minutes (0 versus 8 cases, P < 0.01) and 60 minutes (0 versus 6 cases, P < 0.05) after delivery but a higher incidence of maternal tachycardia (RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.03-3.57). CONCLUSIONS: IM carbetocin is as effective as IM syntometrine in preventing primary postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal delivery. It is less likely to induce hypertension and has a low incidence of adverse effect. It should be considered as a good alternative to conventional uterotonic agents used in managing the third stage of labour.     

Misoprostol dose-related shivering and pyrexia in the third stage of labour. WHO Collaborative Trial of Misoprostol in the Management of the Third Stage of Labour.

OBJECTIVE: To select the misoprostol dose to be used in a large multicentre randomised trial comparing misoprostol with oxytocin in the routine management of the third stage of labour. DESIGN: Randomised pilot trial, double-blinded with the use of double placebos. SETTING: Two of the nine hospitals that will participate in the main multicentre trial. The hospitals were located in Johannesburg, South Africa and Khon Kaen, Thailand. POPULATION: Women during second stage of labour about to be delivered vaginally. METHODS: The trial had three arms: misoprostol 400 microg versus misoprostol 600 microg versus intramuscular oxytocin 10 IU. Each group received an injection and three tablets immediately after the birth of the baby. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Shivering and pyrexia rates were the main outcome measures. Data on other side effects and characteristics of the third stage of labour were also collected. Side effects were noted as none, mild, moderate or severe. RESULTS: Both shivering and pyrexia (temperature > 38 degrees C) were most common in the 600 microg misoprostol group (28% and 7.5% for shivering and pyrexia, respectively) compared with 400 microg misoprostol (19% and 2%), and the oxytocin group (12.5% and 3%). The increase in shivering in the misoprostol 600 microg group was due primarily to a higher rate of moderate shivering. None of the women had a temperature > 40 degrees C. There were no increases in severe side effects and other adverse events in the misoprostol 600 microg group. CONCLUSIONS: When used in the management of the third stage of labour oral misoprostol is associated with an increase in the rate of moderate shivering and pyrexia which seems to be dose-related. Based on the results of this pilot trial, the Steering Committee has decided to use 600 microg misoprostol in the main trial, comparing it with oxytocin, in order to achieve higher effectiveness.     

Comparative Evaluation of 50 Microgram Oral Misoprostol and 25 Microgram Intravaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour at Term: A Randomized Trial

ObjectivesTo assess and compare the efficacy and safety of 50 μg oral misoprostol and 25 μg intravaginal misoprostol for induction of labour at term.MethodsThis non-blinded, randomized clinical trial included 228 pregnant women at term with obstetric or medical indications for induction of labour. Women either took 50 μg misoprostol orally (two 25 μg tablets) or had one 25 μg tablet of misoprostol inserted in the posterior vaginal fornix. In each group, misoprostol administration was repeated every four hours in the same dose until regular uterine contractions were established or to a maximum of five doses. Time to delivery and outcome data for each group were compared.ResultsOf the 228 women, eight (3.5%) were excluded from the analysis as they withdrew their consent after randomization. Mean induction-to-delivery interval was similar in both groups (21.22 hours in the oral group vs. 20.15 hours in the vaginal group; P = 0.58). There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to the number of women who delivered within 24 hours or who required oxytocin augmentation of labour, the mode of delivery, and neonatal outcomes (P > 0.05). Uterine hyperstimulation occurred in two women who received misoprostol vaginally, but not in any of the women in the oral misoprostol group.ConclusionOral misoprostol in a dose of 50 μg every four hours, to a maximum of five doses, has the potential to induce labour as safely and effectively as 25 μg misoprostol administered vaginally every four hours.     

The routine use of oxytocin after oral misoprostol for labour induction in women with an unfavourable cervix is not of benefit

BACKGROUND: Induction of labour with misoprostol is often augmented with oxytocin with the possible consequence of uterine hypercontractility. It is important to determine whether the use of oxytocin in this circumstance has benefit as well as risk. AIM: To compare two regimens for labour induction in women with an unfavourable cervix: oral misoprostol vs. oral misoprostol routinely followed by oxytocin. METHODS: A prospective randomised trial in which 200 women with an unfavourable cervix received either oral misoprostol 25 microg every 3 h (group 1, n = 100) or two such doses routinely followed by oxytocin (group 2, n = 100). Outcomes included change in Bishop score, induction delivery interval, oxytocin requirement, contraction abnormalities, mode of delivery and neonatal outcome. RESULT: The improvement in Bishop score with two misoprostol doses in all 200 women was highly significant (2.9 +/- 1.5 to 6.6 +/- 1.9, P < 0.0001). The induction delivery interval, Caesarean delivery rate, vaginal delivery rate within 24 h, contraction abnormalities and neonatal outcome were similar in both groups. Contraction abnormalities were remarkably low with either regimen (1%). Routine addition of oxytocin 3 h after the second misoprostol dose (group 2) resulted in the maximum oxytocin dose (64 mU/min) being given to more women (66% in group 2; 36% in group 1). CONCLUSION: There was no benefit of routine addition of oxytocin after two doses of misoprostol. Reduced oxytocin requirement was observed when it was added only if needed. Both regimens achieved 85-87% vaginal deliveries with low incidence of hypercontractility.     

Misoprostol for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 400 microg rectal misoprostol in 5 cm(3) of saline with oxytocin 10 IU, i.m., in reducing bleeding during the third stage of labor. DESIGN: A double blind, randomized, clinical trial including 663 women with uncomplicated vaginal delivery who received misoprostol (n=324) or oxytocin (n=339). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit from before to 72 h postpartum; blood loss during the third stage; duration of the third stage of labor; need for additional oxytocic drug; frequency of requisition and of administration of blood; changes in blood pressure; and occurrence of side effects. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between groups, before and 72 h postpartum, in mean hemoglobin and hematocrit, on volume of blood loss and duration of third stage of labor. The incidence of shivering and mean temperature (P<0.01) was significantly greater among women receiving misoprostol than oxytocin. CONCLUSIONS: Misoprostol administered as a micro-enema, 400 microg in 5 ml of saline during the third stage of labor, appears to be as effective as oxytocin 10 IU, i.m., but misoprostol produced more side effects than oxytocin.     

The effect of prophylactic oral tranexamic acid plus buccal misoprostol on blood loss after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of prophylactic oral tranexamic acid (TA) plus buccal misoprostol on the amount of blood loss after vaginal delivery in women at low risk for post-partum hemorrhage (PPH).

Materials and methods: The study was a randomized open label clinical trial conducted in a tertiary University Hospital between January 2016 and June 2017. We included women who delivered vaginally with a singleton pregnancy. They were randomized into three groups: group I (women received 10?IU oxytocin IV after delivery of the baby), group II (women received 600?µg buccal misoprostol after delivery of the baby), and group III (women received 1000?mg oral TA at the end of the first stage of labor plus 600 µg buccal misoprostol after delivery of the baby). In each group, pre- and post-delivery pulse rate, blood pressure, temperature, and hemoglobin level were evaluated. Additionally, the amount of blood loss, need for blood transfusion, need for additional uterotonics, and side effects of the study medications were recorded.

Results: There was a statistically significant lower hemoglobin level and higher blood loss in the misoprostol group compared with oxytocin group and TA plus misoprostol group (p?=?.0001). There was a statistically significant higher hemoglobin level and lower blood loss in the TA plus misoprostol group compared with the oxytocin group (p?=?.004 and .043, respectively). PPH occurred in 16.7% of women in the misoprostol group compared 1.7% in the oxytocin group and no cases of PPH in the TA plus misoprostol group (p?=?.0001).

Conclusions: In settings like rural area or home delivery in which oxytocin is not available, alternative oral TA plus buccal misoprostol may be considered as an effective line in prevention of PPH.     

Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine, from the best available evidence, the effectiveness and safety of misoprostol administered vaginally or orally for third trimester cervical ripening or induction of labour. METHODS: Clinical trials of misoprostol used for cervical ripening or labour induction in the third trimester were identified from the register of randomised trials maintained by the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. All identified trials were considered for inclusion in the review according to a prespecified protocol. Primary outcomes were chosen to address clinical effectiveness (delivery within 24 hours) and safety (uterine hyperstimulation, caesarean section, serious maternal and neonatal morbidity) and were determined a priori. All meta-analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle. In the absence of heterogeneity the summary statistics have been expressed as typical relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Vaginal misoprostol: one small study showed that the use of misoprostol results in more effective cervical ripening and reduced need for oxytocin when compared with placebo. When compared with oxytocin, vaginal misoprostol was more effective for labour induction. The relative risk of failure to achieve vaginal delivery within 24 hours was 0.48 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.66). However, the relative risks for uterine hyperstimulation with and without fetal heart rate abnormalities were 2.54 (95% CI 1.12 to 5.77) and 2.96 (95% CI 2.11 to 4.14), respectively. In three out of four trials which studied women with intact membranes and unfavourable cervices, failure to achieve vaginal delivery within 24 hours was reduced with misoprostol when compared with other prostaglandins (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.81). Vaginal misoprostol was associated with increased uterine hyperstimulation both without fetal heart rate changes (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.14) and with associated fetal heart rate changes (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.04). There was also an increase in meconium stained amniotic fluid following vaginal misoprostol (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.79). Oral misoprostol: one small trial suggests that, when compared with placebo, oral misoprostol reduces the need for oxytocin and shortens the time between induction and delivery. Compared with other prostaglandins one small trial showed a reduced need for oxytocin with oral misoprostol. Two trials compared oral with vaginal misoprostol using different doses. No significant differences were evident. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, misoprostol appears to be more effective than conventional methods of cervical ripening and labour induction. Although no differences in perinatal outcome were shown, the studies were not sufficiently large to exclude the possibility of uncommon serious adverse effects. In particular the increase in uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes following misoprostol is a matter for concern. It is possible that, if sufficient numbers are studied, an unacceptably high number of serious adverse events including uterine rupture and asphyxial fetal deaths may occur. The data at present are not robust enough to address the issue of safety. Thus, though misoprostol shows promise as a highly effective, inexpensive and convenient agent for labour induction, it cannot be recommended for routine use at this stage. Lower dose misoprostol regimens should be investigated further.     

Rectally administered misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin infusion during cesarean delivery to reduce intraoperative and postoperative blood loss

Objective

To compare the efficacy of rectally administered misoprostol with intravenous oxytocin infusion in preventing uterine atony and blood loss during cesarean delivery.

Methods

In this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial, 200 women undergoing cesarean delivery who did not have risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage were randomly allocated to receive either 800 µg of rectal misoprostol at the time of peritoneal incision or an intravenous infusion of oxytocin after delivery of the neonate. Primary outcome measures were estimated amount of intraoperative and postoperative (8 hours) blood loss and changes in hemoglobin levels 24 hours after delivery.

Results

A total of 96 and 94 women were analyzed in the misoprostol and oxytocin groups, respectively. Intraoperative and postoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the misoprostol group than in the oxytocin group (503 vs 592 mL, P = 0.003 and 74 vs 114 mL, P = 0.045, respectively). The incidence of shivering was higher in the misoprostol group (8.3% vs 1.1%, P = 0.018; RR 7.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-61.42).

Conclusion

Rectal misoprostol appears to be an effective alternative to intravenous oxytocin in preventing blood loss for routine use during cesarean delivery. Clinical Trials Registration: CTRI/2009/091/000075.     

A randomized clinical trial comparing oral misoprostol with synthetic oxytocin or syntometrine in the third stage of labour

This is a multicentre, blocked, randomized trial to compare the efficacy of oral misoprostol 400 microg with current injectable uterotonic agents (oxytocin/ Syntometrine) used prophylactically in the third stage of labour. Main outcome measures were blood loss, use of a second uterotonic agent and difference in haemoglobin level from antepartum to postpartum. Data analysis from 863 women showed a statistically significant increase in both the mean blood loss (p < 0.001) and the rate of postpartum haemorrhage > 500 mL, (RR 2.72: 95% C1 1.73-4.27) in the misoprostol group compared to the oxytocin/Syntometrine group. The use of a second uterotonic agent was higher in the misoprostol group (RR 2.89: 95% Cl 2.00-4.18) as well as a greater decrease in postpartum haemoglobin (p = 0.015). Oral misoprostol 400 microg is significantly less effective than the traditional intramuscular uterotonic agents currently used and therefore cannot be considered as a viable option to these agents in the management of the third stage of labour.     

Labour characteristics and uterine activity: misoprostol compared with oxytocin in women at term with prelabour rupture of the membranes

Objective To compare the labour pattern and uterine activity of oral misoprostol with oxytocin for labour induction in women presenting with prelabour rupture of membranes at term.
Design Prospective randomised study.
Setting Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
Participants Eighty women presenting with prelabour rupture of membranes at term.
Methods The women were randomised to receive either 100 μg misoprostol orally every 4 hours to a maximum of three doses, or intravenous oxytocin infusion according to the hospital protocol. Intrauterine pressure transducers were inserted one hour before induction of labour in both groups of women. We compared the pattern of uterine activity, the induction-to-delivery interval, duration of labour, mode of delivery and neonatal outcome between the two groups.
Results Both oxytocin and oral misoprostol caused an increase in uterine activity within one hour of labour induction. Peak uterine activity was reached 6–8 h after oral misoprostol, with persistent effects, and 8–10 h after oxytocin, requiring continuous titration of medication. The duration of labour was significantly reduced in nulliparous women, but not in those who were multiparous in the misoprostol group. The induction-to-delivery interval, the mode of delivery and the perinatal outcome were similar for the two groups.
Conclusion Oral misoprostol caused earlier peak uterine activity, compared with oxytocin (6–8 h vs 8–10 h). Oral misoprostol was not only as effective as oxytocin in inducing labour in women at term with prelabour rupture of the membranes, but it reduced significantly the duration of labour in nulliparous women.     

Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for induction of labour at term. DESIGN: A single-blind randomised comparative trial. SETTING: Induction and labour wards of a UK teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and eleven pregnant women at term in whom induction of labour was indicated, and with no contra-indication to the use of prostaglandins for the induction of labour. INTERVENTION: The women were randomly assigned to receive vaginal administration of either misoprostol 50 microg four hourly (to a maximum of four doses) or dinoprostone gel 1 mg six hourly (to a maximum of three doses). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time from induction to delivery, oxytocin requirement in labour, analgesic requirement, mode of delivery, neonatal outcome. RESULTS: The misoprostol group had a highly significant reduction in median induction-delivery interval compared with the dinoprostone group (14.4 hours vs 22.9 hours; P < 0.00001). In addition, more women delivered after only one dose (77% vs 49%; P < 0.0001, OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.94-6.35), and within 12 and 24 hours. There was a reduced need for oxytocin augmentation in labour (21% vs 47%; P < 0.0001, OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16-0.54). There was no difference in analgesia requirement in labour, or in mode of delivery. There were no adverse neonatal outcomes associated with the use of misoprostol. Women in the misoprostol group experienced more pain in the interval between induction and being given analgesia in labour, but this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Misoprostol 50 microg vaginally is a more effective induction agent than 1 mg dinoprostone vaginal gel, with no apparent adverse effects on mode of delivery, or on the fetus. The higher pain scores in the misoprostol group must be balanced against the reduction in time spent having labour induced, and the reduction in need for intravenous oxytocin augmentation. Further randomised studies must continue to exclude the possibility of rare adverse side effects.     

Sublingual misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin in prevention of post-partum hemorrhage

Background

Post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) is the most common direct cause of maternal mortality and timely intervention can save many lives.

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of sublingual misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin in preventing post-partum hemorrhage in low risk vaginal birth.

Methods

One hundred patients with no risk factor for PPH were randomly allocated to receive 600 μg misoprostol administered sublingually or 10 IU of intravenous oxytocin immediately after the delivery of baby. Main outcome measures were post-partum blood loss, drop in hemoglobin in 24 h, duration of third stage of labor, and drug-related adverse effects.

Results

Mean age, parity and gestational age were similar in both groups. Mean blood loss was significantly lower in oxytocin group (114.28 ± 26.75 versus 149.50 ± 30.78 ml; p = 0.00). Drop in hemoglobin was 0.31 ± 0.16 versus 0.49 ± 0.21 g% (p = 0.01) in oxytocin and misoprostol group, respectively. Duration of third stage labor was shorter in oxytocin group (median 5 min, IQR: 4.5–5.5 versus 5.5 min, IQR: 5–6 min, p < 0.01). Although fever and shivering were common adverse effects with misoprostol but were not clinically significant.

Conclusion

Intravenous oxytocin is more efficacious than sublingual misoprostol in preventing PPH in institutional deliveries.     

Sublingual misoprostol is as effective as intravenous oxytocin to reduce intra-operative blood loss during cesarean delivery in women living at high altitude

Objective: To assess the effect of sublingual misoprostol compared to intravenous oxytocin for blood loss during cesarean delivery in women living at high altitude.

Study design: In a randomized trial, conducted in Quito, Ecuador (2800?m above sea level), 100 women received either sublingual misoprostol (400?µg) or intravenous oxytocin (10?IU).

Results: Bleeding in the misoprostol was no different than in the oxytocin group. Shivering was reported in 66% of women in the misoprostol group.

Conclusion: Sublingual misoprostol might be a valid alternative to oxytocin reduce intra-operative blood loss during cesarean section in women living at high altitude.