Effect of coadministered lopinavir and ritonavir (Kaletra) on tacrolimus blood concentration in liver transplantation patients

With the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), HIV positivity is no longer a contraindication for liver transplantation. Some of the antiretroviral agents, particularly protease inhibitors (e.g., ritonavir, indinavir, and nelfinavir) have been described as potent inhibitors of the metabolism of certain immunosuppressive drugs. In this article we describe a profound interaction between tacrolimus and Kaletra (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) (a combination of lopinavir and ritonavir) in 3 liver transplantation patients. Patient 1, who was maintained on a 5 mg twice daily dose of tacrolimus with a trough blood concentration around 10.6 ng/mL, required only 0.5 mg of tacrolimus per week after addition of Kaletra to achieve similar tacrolimus blood concentrations, with a half-life of 10.6 days. In patient 2, the area under the blood concentration versus time curve for tacrolimus increased from 31 ng/mL/h to 301 ng/mL/h after addition of Kaletra, with a corresponding half-life of 20 days. When the patient was subsequently switched to nelfinavir, the half-life decreased to 10.3 days. Patient 3, who was maintained with 4 to 8 mg/d of tacrolimus and a corresponding blood concentration of 10 ng/mL before Kaletra, required a tacrolimus dose of 1 mg/wk and tacrolimus concentrations of 5 ng/mL with Kaletra. In conclusion, a combination of lopinavir and ritonavir led to a much more profound increase in tacrolimus blood concentrations than use of single protease inhibitor, nelfinavir. A tacrolimus dose of less than 1 mg/wk may be sufficient to maintain adequate blood tacrolimus concentrations in patients on Kaletra. Patients may not need a further dose of tacrolimus for 3 to 5 weeks depending on liver function when therapy with Kaletra is initiated. Great caution is required in the management of tacrolimus dosage when Kaletra is introduced or withdrawn in HIV-positive patients after liver transplantation, particularly in the presence of hepatic dysfunction. (Liver Transpl 2003;9:954-960.)     

Results of simultaneous and sequential pediatric liver and kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The indications for simultaneous and sequential pediatric liver (LTx) and kidney (KTx) transplantation have not been well defined. We herein report the results of our experience with these procedures in children with end-stage liver disease and/or subsequent end-stage renal disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1984 and 1995, 12 LTx recipients received 15 kidney allografts. Eight simultaneous and seven sequential LTx/KTx were performed. There were six males and six females, with a mean age of 10.9 years (1.5-23.7). One of the eight simultaneous LTx/KTx was part of a multivisceral allograft. Five KTx were performed at varied intervals after successful LTx, one KTx was performed after a previous simultaneous LTx/KTx, and one KTx was performed after previous sequential LTx/KTx. Immunosuppression was with tacrolimus or cyclosporine and steroids. Indications for LTx were oxalosis (four), congenital hepatic fibrosis (two), cystinosis (one), polycystic liver disease (one), A-1-A deficiency (one), Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN)-related (one), cryptogenic cirrhosis (one), and hepatoblastoma (one). Indications for KTx were oxalosis (four), drug-induced (four), polycystic kidney disease (three), cystinosis (one), and glomerulonephritis (1). RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 58 months (0.9-130), the overall patient survival rate was 58% (7/12). One-year and 5-year actuarial patient survival rates were 66% and 58%, respectively. Patient survival rates at 1 year after KTx according to United Network of Organ Sharing (liver) status were 100% for status 3, 50% for status 2, and 0% for status 1. The overall renal allograft survival rate was 47%. Actuarial renal allograft survival rates were 53% at 1 and 5 years. The overall hepatic allograft survival rate was equivalent to the overall patient survival rate (58%). Six of seven surviving patients have normal renal allograft function, and one patient has moderate chronic allograft nephropathy. All surviving patients have normal hepatic allograft function. Six (86%) of seven sequentially transplanted kidneys developed acute cellular rejection compared with only two (25%) of eight simultaneously transplanted kidneys (P<0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneously transplanted kidneys were less likely to develop rejection than sequentially transplanted kidneys in this series. This did not have any bearing on patient or graft survival rates. Mortality correlated directly with the severity of United Network of Organ Sharing status at the time of kidney transplantation. Candidates for simultaneous or sequential LTx/KTx should be prioritized based on medical stability to optimize distribution of scarce renal allografts.     

Kidney transplantation for end-stage renal failure in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C viral infection

BACKGROUND: End-stage renal failure after successful liver transplantation (LTx) has been described in up to 5% of patients. Kidney transplantation (KTx) has been the treatment of choice in these cases. However, in recipients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), the augmentation of immunosuppression after KTx may result in an increased viral load. This, in turn, may adversely affect the liver allograft. METHOD: The present study retrospectively examined the outcome in 17 patients (3 females and 14 males, mean age 51.1+/-11.3 years) who received KTx after LTx. The mean interval from LTx to KTx was 57.6+/-32.1 months. The mean follow-up was 41.7+/-20.5 months after KTx, and 99.6+/-37.7 months after LTx. Sixteen of the 17 patients received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression at the time of KTx. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, one patient underwent combined liver and kidney retransplantation 3.7 years after KTx and 12.7 years after LTx. She subsequently died secondary to primary nonfunction. Four other patients died, two of lung cancer, one of pancreatitis/sepsis, and one of severe depression leading to noncompliance. A total of 29 episodes of biopsy-proven acute renal allograft rejection (1.7 episodes/ patient) were encountered and treated with steroids. Seven patients experienced a rise in liver function tests during the period of increased steroid dosage. Four patients received no treatment, and their liver function returned to baseline. The remaining three were treated with interferon. Overall 1- and 3-year actuarial patient and liver allograft survival was 88% and 71% (after renal transplantation); corresponding 1- and 3-year actuarial graft survival was 88% and 61%. Twelve patients are alive with normal liver function. One patient is on dialysis, because of renal allograft loss to noncompliance. CONCLUSION: In this series, LTx recipients with HCV infection were able to undergo KTx with a reasonable degree of success. KTx should be offered for end-stage renal failure after LTx, even in the presence of HCV infection, to individuals with stable liver function and no signs of liver failure.     

Neutropenia in kidney and liver transplant recipients: Risk factors and outcomes

No studies have directly compared the key characteristics and outcomes of kidney (KTx) and liver transplantation (LTx) recipients with neutropenia. In this single‐center, retrospective, cohort study, we enrolled all adult patients who received a KTx or LTx between 2000 and 2011. Neutropenia was defined as 2 consecutive absolute neutrophil count (ANC) values <1500/mm³ in patients without preexisting neutropenia. The first neutropenia episode occurring during the first year post‐transplantation was analyzed. A total of 663 patients with KTx and 354 patients with LTx met the inclusion criteria. Incidence of neutropenia was 20% in KTx and 38% in LTx, respectively. High‐risk CMV status and valganciclovir (VGCV) use were significant predictors of neutropenia for KTx recipients, but only VGCV use vs nonuse in LTx recipients. Neutropenia was associated with worse survival in KTx recipients (adjusted HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.18‐3.22, P<.01), but not in LTx recipients (adjusted HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.52‐1.10, P=.15). Sixteen acute rejection episodes were associated with preceding neutropenia in KTx recipients (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.16‐2.68, P=.007) and 24 acute rejection episodes in LTx recipients (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.97‐2.04, P=.07). Incidence of infection was similar in patients with and without neutropenia among KTx and LTx recipients.     

Higher rates of rejection in HIV‐infected kidney transplant recipients on ritonavir‐boosted protease inhibitors: 3‐year follow‐up study

Rejection rates in HIV‐infected kidney transplant (KTx) recipients are higher than HIV‐negative recipients. Immunosuppression and highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) protocols vary with potentially significant drug‐drug interactions, likely influencing outcomes. This is an IRB‐approved, single‐center, retrospective study of adult HIV‐infected KTx patients between 5/2009 and 12/2014 with 3‐year follow‐up, excluding antibody‐depleting induction. A total of 42 patients were included; median age was 52 years, 81% male, 50% African American, 29% Hispanic, 17% Caucasian. The most common renal failure etiology was hypertensive nephrosclerosis (50%) with 5.8 median years of pre‐transplant dialysis. All patients received IL‐2 receptor antagonist, were maintained on tacrolimus (76%) or cyclosporine (17%), and 40% received ritonavir‐boosted PI‐based HAART (rtv+) regimen. Patient and graft survival at 3 years were 93% and 90%. At 1‐, 2‐, and 3‐year time points, median serum creatinine was 1.49, 1.35, and 1.67; treated biopsy‐proven rejection was 38%, 38%, and 40.5%; and 92% of episodes were acute rejection. At these time points, rejection rates were significantly higher with boosted PI HAART regimens compared to other HAART regimens, 59% vs 24% (P = 0.029), 59% vs 24% (P = 0.029), and 68% vs 24% (P = 0.01). Despite higher rejection rates, HIV‐infected KTx recipients have reasonable outcomes. Given significantly higher rejection rates using rtv+ regimens, alternative HAART regimens should be considered prior to transplantation.     

The comprehensive assessment of physical fitness in children following kidney and liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Pediatric organ transplant recipients may have elevated cardiovascular (CV) risk. Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) may contribute to CV risk; however, studies of CRF in children following kidney transplantation (KTx) and liver transplantation (LTx) are limited. METHODS: Laboratory testing included assessment of CRF (VO2peak), muscle strength, and body composition (%fat). Field testing (FITNESSGRAM) included the PACER, curl-up, and sit-and-reach tests. Values obtained were compared to sex- and age-based criterion-referenced standards (Healthy Fitness Zone, HFZ). The Previous Day Physical Activity Recall was used to assess after-school physical activity (PA) participation. Independent t tests were used to compare groups. RESULTS: Twenty-five KTx and 11 LTx recipients were tested. The groups were similar in all measures. Both groups demonstrated below normative values for VO2peak and muscle strength. Only 4% of the KTx and 9% of the LTx recipients achieved the HFZ for the PACER and 24% of the KTx and 45% of the LTx attained the HFZ for the curl-up test. Approximately 44% of both groups had percent fat greater than the upper criterion value of the HFZ. Both groups reported spending only 8% of their after-school time participating in physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric KTx and LTx recipients have significantly reduced CRF, muscle strength, and physical activity. Routine counseling and encouragement for increased physical activity is recommended as a part of routine care. A randomized clinical exercise intervention trial after pediatric solid organ transplantation is warranted to determine the impact of such lifestyle intervention on improving physical fitness and cardiovascular health.     

Survival of Liver Transplant Patients Coinfected with HIV and HCV Is Adversely Impacted by Recurrent Hepatitis C

Although liver transplantation (LTx) in HIV-positive patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has been successful, some have reported poorer outcomes in patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Here we discuss the impact of recurrent HCV on 27 HIV-positive patients who underwent LTx. HIV infection was well controlled post-transplantation. Survival in HIV-positive/HCV-positive patients was shorter compared to a cohort of HIV-negative/HCV-positive patients matched in age, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and time of transplant, with cumulative 1-, 3- and 5-year patient survival of 66.7%, 55.6% and 33.3% versus 75.7%, 71.6% and 71.6%, respectively, although not significantly (p = 0.07), and there was a higher likelihood of developing cirrhosis or dying from an HCV-related complication in coinfected subjects (RR = 2.6, 95% CI, 1.06-6.35; p = 0.03). Risk factors for poor survival included African-American race (p = 0.02), MELD score > 20 (p = 0.05), HAART intolerance postLTx (p = 0.01), and postLTx HCV RNA > 30000000 IU/mL (p = 0.00). Recurrent HCV in 18 patients was associated with eight deaths, including three from fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Among surviving coinfected recipients, five are alive at least 3 years after LTx, and of 15 patients treated with interferon-alpha/ribavirin, six (40%) are HCV RNA negative, including four with sustained virological response. Hepatitis C is a major cause of graft loss and patient mortality in coinfected patients undergoing LTx.     

Hypocitraturia as a risk factor for nephrocalcinosis after kidney transplantation

Calcium-oxalate crystal deposition in kidney transplant biopsy specimen led us to investigate the impact of calcineurin inhibitor treatment on urinary excretion of lithogenic and stone inhibitory substances in 53 children after successful kidney transplantation (KTx) receiving cyclosporine A (CsA) or tacrolimus. We compared the values obtained with those of 12 patients with recurrent nephrotic syndrome under CsA and of 6 patients with Rasmussen encephalitis (RE) under tacrolimus therapy. Renal ultrasound examinations were repeatedly performed. Hypocitraturia was found in 69% of patients, with KTx patients having a significantly lower urinary citrate excretion than those receiving calcineurin inhibitors for other reasons. Secondly, we found hyperoxaluria in 35% of patients, again especially in those after KTx. No significant difference in urinary substances was seen comparing CsA with tacrolimus treatment. Urolithiasis was found in one and calcium-oxalate crystal deposition in biopsy specimen of three KTx patients. Calcineurin inhibitor treatment can lead to significant hypocitraturia, especially in patients after KTx receiving the highest dose of medication. Hyperoxaluria is primarily the result of a removal of significant body oxalate stores, deposited during dialysis, but may not be suspected as a specific side effect of calcineurin inhibitor therapy. Both findings can increase the risk for urolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis.     

The Impact of Conversion From Prograf to Generic Tacrolimus in Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients With Stable Graft Function

Bioequivalence of the recently available generic tacrolimus formulation, manufactured by Sandoz, to the reference product (Prograf; Astellas Pharma, Tokyo, Japan) has been demonstrated in healthy subjects. However, the safety and efficacy of substitution with generic tacrolimus in transplant patients have not been evaluated. Tacrolimus trough concentrations and indices of liver and kidney function were recorded before and after generic substitution in 48 liver and 55 kidney transplant recipients. In liver transplant patients, the mean tacrolimus concentration/dose (C/D) ratio (±SD) was 184.1 (±123.2) ([ng/mL]/[mg/kg/day]) for the reference product and 154.7 (±87.8) ([ng/mL]/[mg/kg/day]) for the generic product (p < 0.05). The mean C/D‐ratios in kidney transplant patients were 125.3 (±92.7) and 110.4 (±79.2) ([ng/mL]/[mg/kg/day]) for the reference and generic products, respectively (p < 0.05). Actual trough concentrations declined by an average of 1.98 ng/mL in liver and 0.87 ng/mL in kidney transplant patients following the switch, after accounting for all significant covariates. No change was observed in biochemical indices of liver or kidney function and no cases of acute rejection occurred following the substitution. These results suggest that transplant patients currently taking the reference tacrolimus formulation may be safely switched to the Sandoz‐generic product provided trough concentrations are closely monitored following the substitution.     

Liver transplantation in HCV/HIV positive patients

Since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in 1996 for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, the incidence of liver diseases secondary to co-infection with hepatitis C has increased. Although data on the outcome of liver transplantation in HIV-infected recipients is limited, the overall results to date seem to be comparable to that in non-HIV-infected recipients. Liver transplant centers are now accepting HIV-infected individuals as organ recipients. Post-transplantation HIV replication is controlled by HAART. Hepatitis C re-infection of the liver graft, however, remains an important problem because cirrhotic changes of the liver graft may be more rapid in HIV-infected recipients. Interactions between the HAART components and immunosuppressive drugs influence drug metabolism and therefore meticulous monitoring of drug blood level concentrations is required. The risk of opportunistic infection in HIV-positive transplant patients seems to be similar to that in HIV-negative transplant recipients.     

Primary adult liver transplantation under tacrolimus: more than 90 months actual follow-up survival and adverse events.

The introduction of tacrolimus has shown decreased rates of acute and steroid-resistant rejection after liver transplantation (LTx). The aim of the present study is to examine the long-term efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in primary liver transplant recipients. The first 121 consecutive adults (aged >16 years) who underwent primary LTx at a single center from August 1989 to February 1990 were followed up until August 1997. The mean follow-up was 93.2 +/- 1.2 months (range, 90.5 to 96.5 months). Patient survival, graft survival, rate of rejection, and adverse events were examined. The actual 7-year patient survival rate was 67.8%, and the graft survival rate was 63.6%. Infections, recurrence of disease, de novo malignancies, and cardiovascular events constituted the main causes of graft loss and death in the long term. Graft loss related to acute or chronic rejection was rare. The rate of acute rejection beyond 2 years was approximately 3% per year, and most rejections were steroid responsive. Approximately 70% of the patients received only tacrolimus after 1 year. Four patients developed end-stage renal disease, and 2 patients underwent kidney transplantation. Hyperkalemia and hypertension were observed in one third of the patients. New-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus was observed in 9% and 13% of the patients at the 1-year and 7-year follow-up, respectively. Seven patients developed de novo malignancies, including two skin malignancies. Six patients developed posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder during the entire follow-up period. Actual patient and graft survival at 7 years was excellent, and few adverse events developed after the first year. Graft loss from acute or chronic rejection was rare under tacrolimus, and approximately 70% of the patients were steroid free on tacrolimus monotherapy after the first year after LTx.     

Living donor liver transplant recipients achieve relatively higher immunosuppressant blood levels than cadaveric recipients

Two recent brief reports suggest that recipients of living donor liver transplants achieve higher levels of immunosuppressive agents than cadaveric (CAD) liver transplant recipients administered the same dose. These results could have important implications regarding the dosing of immunosuppressives in living donor liver transplant recipients. We report our findings relative to immunosuppressive doses and levels in a cohort of 46 living donor liver transplant recipients. Immunosuppressive blood levels and doses were recorded weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 and months 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 for 46 living donor liver transplant recipients and 66 matched CAD liver transplant recipients who underwent transplantation between August 1997 and May 2001. The ratio of level to dose also was recorded at each interval. The mean overall cyclosporine A dose was similar in living donor liver transplant recipients (323 mg/d) compared with CAD recipients (344 mg/d; P = not significant [NS]). The mean overall tacrolimus dose was 15% lower in patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT; 5.7 mg/d) than CAD transplantation (6.7 mg/d), although statistical significance was not achieved (P = .08). The mean overall cyclosporine A level was 18% higher in those undergoing LDLT (275 ng/mL) than CAD transplantation (234 ng/mL; P = .015). The mean overall tacrolimus level was the same in living donor liver transplant recipients (10.8 ng/mL) and CAD recipients (10.2 ng/mL; P = NS). The overall cyclosporine A level-dose ratio was 26% higher for those undergoing LDLT (0.83) than CAD transplantation (0.66; P = .01). The overall tacrolimus level-dose ratio was 26% higher for those undergoing LDLT (1.82) than CAD transplantation (1.44; P = .01). In conclusion, (1) living donor liver transplant recipients achieve higher blood levels of tacrolimus and cyclosporine A for a given dose compared with CAD recipients, and (2) this difference is observed up to 6 months after transplantation, when hepatic regeneration is completed. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:212-218.)     

Calcineurin Inhibitor–Based Maintenance Immunosuppression in Lung Transplant Recipients: Optimal Serum Levels for Managing Acute Rejection and Renal Function

BackgroundAlthough effective for curtailing alloimmune responses, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have an adverse-effect profile that includes nephrotoxicity. In lung transplant (LTx) recipients, the optimal serum levels of the CNI tacrolimus necessary to control alloimmune responses and minimize nephrotoxicity are unknown.MethodsThis retrospective, single-center study reviewed tacrolimus whole blood trough levels (BTLs), grades of acute cellular rejection (ACR), acute rejection scores, and creatinine clearance (CrCl) obtained in LTx recipients within the first year after their transplant procedure. Comparisons were made between the first 90 days post LTx (when tacrolimus BTLs were maintained >10 µg/L) and the remainder of the post-LTX year (when BTLs were <10 µg/L).ResultsDespite tacrolimus mean BTLs being higher during the first 90 days post LTx compared with the remainder of the first post-LTx year (10.4 ± 0.3 µg/L vs 9.5 ± 0.3 µg/L, P < .0001) there was no association with lower grades of ACR (P = .24). The intensity of ACR (as determined by acute rejection scores) did not correlate with tacrolimus mean BTLs at any time during the first posttransplant year (P = .79). During the first 90 days post LTx there was a significant decline in CrCl and a correlation between increasing tacrolimus mean BTLs and declining CrCl (r = −0.26, P = .03); a correlation that was not observed during the remainder of the year (r = −0.09, P = .52).ConclusionsIn LTx recipients, maintaining BTLs of the CNI tacrolimus >10µg/L did not result in superior control of acute rejection responses but was associated with declining renal function.     

Mucosal associated invariant T cells are differentially impaired in tolerant and immunosuppressed liver transplant recipients

Mucosal associated invariant T (MAIT-) cells represent a semi-invariant T cell population responsive to microbial vitamin B metabolite and innate cytokine stimulation, executing border tissue protection and particularly contributing to human liver immunity. The impact of immunosuppressants on MAIT cell biology alone and in context with solid organ transplantation has not been thoroughly examined. Here, we demonstrate that in vitro cytokine activation of peripheral MAIT cells from healthy individuals was impaired by glucocorticoids, whereas antigen-specific stimulation was additionally sensitive to calcineurin inhibitors. In liver transplant (LTx) recipients, significant depletion of peripheral MAIT cells was observed that was largely independent of the type and dosage of immunosuppression, equally applied to tolerant patients, and was reproducible in kidney transplant recipients. However, MAIT cells from tolerant LTx patients exhibited a markedly diminished ex vivo activation signature, associated with individual regain of functional competence toward antigenic and cytokine stimulation. Still, MAIT cells from tolerant and treated liver recipients exhibited high levels of PD1, accompanied by functional impairment particularly toward bacterial stimulation that also affected polyfunctionality. Our data suggest interlinked effects of primary liver pathology and immunosuppressive treatment on overall MAIT cell fitness after transplantation and propose their monitoring in context with tolerance induction protocols.     

Determining the conversion ratios for oral versus sublingual administration of tacrolimus in solid organ transplant recipients

Tacrolimus is utilized as maintenance immunosuppression in solid organ transplant (SOT). Current literature has reported conflicting conversion ratios when transitioning between oral and sublingual tacrolimus, and the exact conversion ratio has not been fully established in SOT. The purpose of this study was to determine the conversion ratios between oral and sublingual tacrolimus needed to achieve equivalent whole blood concentrations in heart, kidney, liver, and lung transplant recipients. A retrospective, single‐center analysis was conducted at Mayo Clinic in Florida. One hundred and eighteen hospitalized SOT recipients who received oral and sublingual tacrolimus during the same inpatient admission from June 1, 2012, through June 1, 2017, were reviewed. The median conversion ratio of sublingual to oral tacrolimus was 1.34 (IQR: 1.03‐1.93) in all SOT, 1.25 (IQR: 1.08‐1.64) in heart transplant, 1.23 (IQR: 1.1‐2.06) in kidney transplant, 1.64 (IQR: 1.27‐2.29) in liver transplant, and 1.34 (IQR: 0.94‐1.93) in lung transplant. A slightly higher dose of oral tacrolimus is needed in the majority of solid organ recipients in our population when converting between sublingual to oral tacrolimus administration.     

Pneumatosis Intestinalis After Living Donor Lung Transplantation Associated With Alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitor Treatment: A Case Report

IntroductionPneumatosis intestinalis (PI) is a rare but critical condition in which gas is found in the bowel wall. Although organ transplant recipients have an increased PI risk because of long-term immunosuppression, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (α-GI), a standard diabetes therapy, often contribute to PI. However, little is known about the postorgan transplantation relationship between PI and α-GI. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of PI in a lung transplant recipient treated with α-GI.Case reportA 59-year-old man underwent hybrid (living-donor and cadaveric) lung transplantation (LTx). The patient was treated with prednisolone and tacrolimus as immunosuppressive therapy and α-GI for diabetes for 4 years. He developed asymptomatic PI 1031 days after transplantation without any acute abdominal finding. After excluding other possible causes of PI, his PI was attributed to α-GI. The suspected α-GI was immediately withdrawn. The patient was managed conservatively with bowel rest and oxygen therapy. After 11 days of α-GI discontinuation, PI improved, and the patient completely recovered.ConclusionPhysicians should keep this rare adverse drug reaction in mind when prescribing α-GI, particularly in patients with diabetes after organ transplantation and including LTx. The management strategy for asymptomatic PI caused by α-GI is the immediate discontinuation of α-GI therapy, followed by conservative management initiation.