Left-sided predominance of hypodontia irrespective of cleft sidedness in a French population

Objective : Individuals with oral clefts exhibit considerably more dental anomalies than do individuals without clefts. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence of tooth agenesis in a sample composed of 124 children (81 boys and 43 girls, mean age 12.5?years) with clefts registered with the Cleft Palate Center in Strasbourg (France). Design : Cleft types and dental agenesis were assessed by clinical and radiographic examination. Cleft types were divided into four groups according to the clinical extent of the cleft (cleft lip only [CL, 12.9%], cleft lip and alveolus [CLA, 4%], cleft lip and palate [CLP, 49.2%], and cleft palate only [CP, 33.9%]). Results : Of the subjects 63% had evidence of hypodontia: maxillary lateral incisors (54%) and upper and lower premolars (32%) were the most common missing teeth. The number of dental ageneses associated with CP (54%) and CLP (79%) was significantly higher than that with CL (33%). All these anomalies were found in proportionately higher frequencies as the severity of the cleft increased, and we found left side predominance for hypodontia (p < .01) irrespective of cleft sidedness. Conclusions : Both right-sided and left-sided clefts were more frequently correlated with left-sided dental agenesis. This left-sided prevalence suggests that common signaling malfunctions might be involved, both in dental development anomalies and cleft genesis.     

Antenatal transabdominal ultrasound detection of cleft lip and palate in Western Australia from 1996 to 2003.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of detection of cleft lip with or without cleft palate and isolated cleft palate from antenatal ultrasound examinations conducted on mothers of infants born with cleft lip and/or palate and isolated cleft palate in Western Australia from 1996 to 2003. DESIGN: Review of patient records and purpose-designed questionnaire sent to parents of children born with cleft lip and/or palate and isolated cleft palate. RESULTS: There were 308 infants born with cleft lip and/or palate and isolated cleft palate in the study period. Of the 293 parents, 218 responses were available for the study (70.7%), and 2.9 +/- 1.8 SD antenatal ultrasound scans were performed on 216 women. No such scans were performed on two women. Cleft lip and/or palate was detected in 22.2% of cases. There was no detection prior to 15 weeks gestational age in the 137 women screened. Between 15 and 19 weeks gestational age, 174 scans detected 30 cases. Between 20 and 29 weeks gestational age, 84 scans detected 11 cases. Between 30 and 40 weeks gestational age, 66 scans detected 7 cases. The detection rate for bilateral cleft lip and/or palate was 44.4% and for unilateral cleft lip and/or palate, 40.6%. Detection rate for isolated cleft lip was 33.3%. Antenatal ultrasound failed to detect any infants with an isolated cleft palate (n = 95). The rate of detection of cleft lip and/or palate increased through the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of detection of cleft lip and/or palate in Western Australia is comparable to that for referral centers worldwide and is increasing. The rate of detection of the various types of cleft anomalies using antenatal ultrasound ranged from 0% to 44%.     

Prevention of orofacial clefts: does pregnancy planning have a role?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between pregnancy planning and orofacial clefts in the United Kingdom. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Scotland and the Manchester and Merseyside regions of England. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and ninety-one children born with nonsyndromic orofacial cleft, 1997 to 2000, and 247 controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cleft lip with and without cleft palate, and cleft palate. RESULTS: There was an inverse association between planning for pregnancy and orofacial cleft in the offspring (odds ratio [OR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.33-0.79). An unplanned pregnancy together with smoking in the first trimester of pregnancy resulted in almost treble the risk of a child with an orofacial cleft when compared with those who planned their pregnancy and did not smoke (OR = 2.92, CI = 1.50-5.65). CONCLUSIONS: Planned pregnancies were associated with a lower risk of orofacial clefts. Isolation of the elements of pregnancy planning implicated in these results is difficult. Current preconception advice needs to reach a wider audience; however, for maximum impact, efforts are needed to reduce the numbers of unplanned pregnancies.     

Distribution of orofacial clefts and frequent occurrence of an unusual cleft variant in the Rift Valley of Kenya.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pattern and distribution of nonsyndromic orofacial clefts among patients in the Rift Valley region of northwestern Kenya. METHODS: Subjects were categorized anatomically for occurrence of an atypical cleft lip variant (ACL), typical cleft lip (CL), cleft lip and palate (CLP), or cleft palate (CP), and family history of orofacial clefts. Tribal ethnicity data were obtained from both cleft and noncleft clinic attendees. RESULTS: There were 194 patients with CL (52.7%), 153 with CLP (41.6%), and 21 with CP (5.7%). CL constitutes a greater fraction of orofacial clefts in the Rift Valley region than reported elsewhere in Africa, principally due to frequent occurrence of ACL (52.5% of all CL). Among noncleft clinic attendees there was a lower fraction of Bantu and larger fraction of Nilotic-Paranilotic tribal ethnicity than in Kenya overall. In contrast, among patients with orofacial clefts there was significant underrepresentation of Bantu and overrepresentation of Nilotic-Paranilotic tribes, particularly Kalenjin. Patients of Kalenjin origin had a much higher rate of positive family history of orofacial clefts than Bantu patients. CONCLUSIONS: There is an unusual anatomic distribution of orofacial clefts in the Kenya Rift Valley, with frequent occurrence of an atypical CL variant. Our findings indicate that Bantu tribes have lower risk of orofacial clefts than Nilotic-Paranilotic tribes, possibly due to inherited genetic differences, perhaps accounting for the relatively low prevalence of orofacial clefts through much of Africa.     

Prevalence of orofacial clefts in Saudi Arabia and neighboring countries: A systematic review

Cleft lip and/or palate are among the most common birth defects in the world. The prevalence of these conditions varies considerably across geographic areas and ethnic groups.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review and appraisal of the literature on the prevalence of cleft lip and/or palate in Saudi Arabia and comparable Middle Eastern countries.Materials and methodsAll published articles on orofacial clefts (OFC) in Saudi Arabia and its bordering countries in the Middle East with similar and comparable population characteristics were reviewed in July 2010.ResultsAfter reviewing the articles, only eight matched the inclusion criteria. Three studies were carried out in two regions in Saudi Arabia (Riyadh and Al-Qaseem). The other five studies were set in Dubai, Oman, and Jordan. The prevalence of cleft lip and/or palate reported in these studies varied greatly from 0.3 to 2.4 per 1000 live births. The birth prevalence of orofacial clefts in males was reported to be higher than in females. The isolated cleft palate prevalence was reported to be higher in females in most of the studies.ConclusionThe eightfold variation in the prevalence of orofacial clefts between highest and lowest prevalence is likely to be due, at least in part, to problems with ascertainment, but there may also be underlying genetic or environmental factors that require further investigation.     

Differences in the clinical appearances of white versus black patients with facial cleft deformities: a retrospective study of a South African clinic.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in prevalence of the different categories of facial cleft deformities between the white and black patients in a database of 2806 cleft cases at the University of Pretoria. No variation of clefts between these two groups has ever been compared previously. For this purpose, the clefts were classified according to the system described by Bütow in 1985. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Records of 2806 patients attending the university's cleft lip and palate clinic, between August 1983 and February 2006, were reviewed. The study group included cleft patients with syndromic and nonsyndromic CL, CLA, CLAP, hP, hPsP, sP, COMBI clefts with or without oblique or transverse facial (or Tessier) clefts. Very few of the cases presented with speech problems only, but with no clefts. The cleft categories of cleft lip, cleft palate and cleft lip and palate, as well as their subdivisions, were analysed. RESULTS: Of these cleft patients, 2003 were white patients and 665 were black patients; the rest were Indian, Coloured and East-Asian patients. In the black and the white population groups (n = 2668), there were more males with cleft in the white group (58.2%), but more females with clefts in the black group (54.9%). The most common cleft type generally was the cleft lip, alveolus and palate cleft (CLAP) with a 434% prevalence of white patients and 296% of black patients. The most common cleft in the black patients was the cleft palate at 435%, which was only recorded in 35.0% of the white patients. The frequency of the other orofacial clefts in decreasing order was: sP 19.4% for white and 21.2% for black; hPsP 15.2% for white and 21.2% for black; CLA 9.7% for white and 19.8% for black; CL 5.9% for white and 4.5% for black and combinations of different orofacial clefts (COMBI), 6.0% for white and 2.6% for black. The isolated hard palate cleft (hP) occurred very rarely (0.4% for white and 1.1% for black). The left side of the face was more often afflicted (left to right 51.6% to 28.5% for white; and 35.0% to 37.9% for black). In 0.5% (white) and 3.9% (black) median clefts were observed. CONCLUSION: A retrospective study was done of 2806 facial black patients (2668 cases). There was a considerable variation between the groups of orofacial clefts occurring in the two groups.     

An epidemiologic study of oral clefts in Iran: analysis of 1,669 cases.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the epidemiology and some genetic aspects of oral clefting in Iran. DESIGN: The study was a 15-year cross-sectional (prevalence) study from August 1976 to September 1991. SETTING: The setting for the study was two plastic surgery departments, both mostly referral centers, and a maternity hospital in Iran. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were 1,669 consecutive surgical cases with oral clefts (79% between 1 day and 18 months of age), registered in two centers. In a parallel study, 19,369 livebirths born in a maternity hospital within the same period were surveyed to ascertain prevalence of clefting at birth. Normal children of this population were used as the control group. Samples were analyzed by prevalence of clefting at birth, type of oral cleft, side of clefting, sex ratio, associated malformations, clefts in relatives, and parental consanguinity. RESULTS: The prevalence of clefts was 1.03 per 1,000 births. Cleft lip (without cleft palate) had a higher (34.9%) and cleft palate alone had a significantly lower prevalence (17.4%) than expected. Cleft lip (without cleft palate) was more common in females (53.6%) than in males (46.4%). The rate of associated malformations in cleft patients (7.73%) was higher than in controls (0.093%). Association between clefting and consanguinity was significant (45.8% in cases versus 43.1% in controls). Occurrence of noncleft congenital malformations among first-degree relatives of our cases (2.77%) was nearly two times that of controls (1.55%). CONCLUSION: Our study reveals that the population incidence of oral clefts in Iran is much closer to European than Arab-African or South East Asian countries. However, significant variations in other epidemiologic and some genetic features were observed.     

Genetic association studies of cleft lip and/or palate with hypodontia outside the cleft region.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the candidate genes previously studied in subjects with cleft lip, cleft palate, or both are associated with hypodontia outside the region of the cleft. SUBJECTS: One hundred twenty subjects from the Iowa Craniofacial Anomalies Research Center were selected based on the availability of both dental records and genotype information. METHOD: The type of orofacial clefting and type and location of dental anomalies (missing teeth, supernumerary teeth, or peg laterals) were assessed by dental chart review and radiographic examination. Genotype analysis of candidate genes was performed using polymerase chain reaction/single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of hypodontia in this sample was 47.5%, with 30.0% of subjects having missing teeth outside the cleft. There was a positive association between subjects with cleft lip or cleft lip and palate who had hypodontia outside the cleft region (compared with noncleft controls) and both muscle segment homeo box homolog 1 (MSX1) (p =.029) and transforming growth factor beta 3 (TGFB3) (p =.024). It was not possible in this analysis to determine whether this association was specifically associated with orofacial clefting combined with hypodontia or whether it was due primarily to the clefting phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, there was a significantly greater incidence of hypodontia outside the cleft region in subjects with cleft lip and palate, compared with cleft lip only or cleft palate only. Cleft lip and/or palate with hypodontia outside the cleft region was positively associated with both TGFB3 and MSX1, compared with noncleft controls.     

A descriptive epidemiology study of cleft lip and palate in Northern Finland

Objective. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of cleft lip and/or cleft palate in a population uniquely from Northern Finland. Materials and methods. The records of a total of 214 cleft patients treated between 1998–2011 at the Oulu Cleft Lip and Palate Center at the University of Oulu were assessed on a retrospective basis. Data regarding cleft type, sex and side of cleft was collected and analyzed. Family history of clefting was investigated. Results. Cleft palate (68.7%) was most frequently found, followed by cleft lip and palate (18.7%) and cleft lip with or without alveolus (12.6%). Cleft palate occurred more frequently in females (63.3%) and cleft lip and palate was more frequently found in males (62.5%). The left side was more frequently affected in both male and female patients. Left-sided clefts were observed in 82% of patients compared to right-sided clefts in 18%. A family history of clefting was detected in 20.1% of patients. Conclusion. The incidence of clefts in Northern Finland is higher than the corresponding incidence in other European countries. Cleft palate was the most frequent cleft type and it was more frequent in females. In males, cleft lip and palate was more frequent. The left side was more frequently affected in both genders. One fifth of the patients had a family history of clefts.     

Birth prevalence of orofacial cleft in a tertiary hospital in Riyadh,Saudi Arabia: A retrospective audit

AimThe present study aimed to calculate the birth prevalence of orofacial cleft patients in King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) Tertiary Care Hospital in Riyadh City, KSA.Material and methodsThe data utilized in this retrospective study were obtained from the birth data registry at the hospital covering the period between January 2014 and December 2018. The data collected for the orofacial cleft patients pertained to the birth year, type of cleft, gender, and associated syndromes.ResultsThe total number of documented orofacial cleft cases born between 2014 and 2018 was 78, with a birth prevalence of 1.8 per 1000 live births and no gender bias. Cleft palate (CP) represented the most common type at 38.5% (n = 30), followed by cleft lip at 26.9% (n = 21) and unilateral cleft lip and palate at 24% (n = 19). The least common type was facial cleft, at 3.4% (n = 6). Syndrome association was seen in 15.4% (n = 12) of the cases.ConclusionThe birth prevalence of orofacial clefts in KAMC Riyadh city is in accordance with the worldwide ratio and similar to the birth prevalence reported in the Middle East area. CP showed more prevalence than the other orofacial cleft types, and the association with syndromes was significantly low.     

Seasonal variation and regional distribution of cleft lip and palate in zambia

Objective: To assess variations in seasonality and regional distribution of orofacial clefts in babies born in Zambia. Design: A retrospective chart review was done using records of all cleft procedures performed by the only plastic surgeon in Zambia (G.J.). Delivery data from the University Teaching Hospital (UTH) were also examined to estimate the birth prevalence of orofacial clefts (55,108 live births between 2001 and 2005). Patients: All cleft patients operated in Zambia from 2000 to 2006 (413 patients). Results: A low birth prevalence of clefts (1/4239 live births) was found using UTH delivery data. Surgical data showed no difference for the frequency of one gender over another overall (M:F ratio is 1.04; p = .70). More bilateral clefts occurred in cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients than in cleft lip (CL) patients (p < .01), and more unilateral left-sided clefts occurred in CL than in CLP patients (p = .03). The data reflected seasonal variation in month of birth of cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL+/-P) patients (p < .01), with a peak in April and May and more births in March through August (57.2%) than in September through February (42.8%). There was regional variation in cleft births among the nine Zambian provinces (p < .01). Conclusions: This study shows seasonal variation in clefts that may be explained, at least in part, by environmental factors affecting the development of CL+/-P. Access to treatment is likely the major determinant of regional disparity in clefts. These results provide a basis for further epidemiological studies of orofacial clefts in Zambia.     

The prevalence of non-syndromic orofacial clefts and associated congenital heart diseases of a tertiary hospital in Riyadh,Saudi Arabia

BackgroundOrofacial clefts are considered one of the most common birth defects and are frequently associated with other malformations. Congenital heart disease is one of the most prevalent congenital malformation.ObjectiveTo investigate the prevalence of congenital heart diseases associated with non-syndromic orofacial clefts in the Saudi population.MethodsElectronic files of non-syndromic orofacial cleft patients who visited the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department in King Abdulaziz Medical City of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from January 2015 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Data were recorded in an excel sheet and analyzed using SPSS via frequency tests.ResultsIn the cleft children identified, the prevalence of non-syndromic orofacial clefts was (77%). Orofacial clefts showed a male predominance (62%). The most common orofacial phenotype was unilateral cleft lip and palate (34%). The prevalence of associated congenital malformations with orofacial clefts was (41%). The most prevalent congenital malformation was congenital heart disease (35%), mainly found in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients (33%). The prevalence of associated congenital heart disease with orofacial clefts was (19%). The most frequent type of congenital heart disease was atrial septal defect (37%).ConclusionThis study highlights the recognition of the associated congenital heart disease with non-syndromic orofacial cleft patients. Global screening protocols designed for newborns with non-syndromic orofacial cleft are needed to eliminate late diagnosis of critical congenital heart diseases which might present operative risks of anesthesia and/or surgical procedures.     

Maternal drug use and infant cleft lip/palate with special reference to corticoids.

OBJECTIVE: To study the association between maternal drug use in early pregnancy and orofacial cleft in the infant. DESIGN: Register analysis based on prospectively collected information.Patients: All delivered women in Sweden July 1, 1995, through December 31, 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Presence of orofacial cleft in infant. RESULTS: Prospective information on maternal drug use during the first trimester, as reported in early pregnancy, was studied in 1142 infants with orofacial clefts, isolated or with other malformations, excluding chromosome anomalies. Any drug use was not associated with clefts (odds ratio [OR] = 0.98, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.85 to 1.13), with isolated clefts (OR = 0.92) with isolated median cleft palate (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.36) or with isolated cleft lip with or without cleft palate (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.71 to 1.05). Reported use of multivitamins, folic acid, or B(12) was not associated with a decrease in orofacial cleft risk (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.63 to 1.52). ORs above 2 were seen for some drugs: sulfasalazine, naproxen, and anticonvulsants, but only a few exposed cases occurred. An association between glucocorticoid use and infant cleft was indicated and seemed to be strongest for median cleft palate. CONCLUSION: Maternal drug use seems to play only a small role for the origin of orofacial clefts, at least in Sweden.     

Access to antenatal healthcare and the prevalence of oral clefts: a spatial analysis

Congenital anomalies are caused by a variety of risk factors, including individual and environmental ones. This study estimated the prevalence of oral clefts and examined their area-level risk indicators using data from The National Congenital Anomaly Survey in South Korea. Disease mapping and ecological regression were used to assess the geographical variation and potential risk indicators for oral clefts, such as living in a rural area, material deprivation, and limited access to antenatal healthcare. In South Korea, 1.15 (95% CI, 1.08–1.23) children out of every 1,000 births were born with oral clefts during 2005 and 2006. The most common oral cleft type was cleft palate, followed by cleft lip, then cleft lip and palate. Disease mapping showed that the proportion of areas with a higher risk than the national average was relatively higher for oral clefts than for all congenital abnormalities among rural and healthcare underserved areas. The relative risk of oral cleft prevalence was higher in rural areas and healthcare underserved areas than in urban areas and areas with better access to healthcare. The findings suggest that access to antenatal healthcare as well as area-level risk indicators should be considered a priority when developing measures to decrease the occurrence of oral clefts.     

Epidemiology of Hoffmeister's "genetically determined predisposition to disturbed development of the dentition" in patients with cleft lip and palate.

OBJECTIVE: Type and prevalence rates of the symptoms of Hoffmeister's "genetically determined predisposition to disturbed development of the dentition" were studied in patients with clefts. PATIENTS: Data of 263 patients with nonsyndromic clefts of lip (alveolus and palate) or isolated cleft palates were examined in a retrospective study. SETTING: The clefts were classified as cleft lip or cleft lip and alveolus, cleft palate, unilateral cleft lip and palate, and bilateral cleft lip and palate. All patients were scrutinized for 28 individual symptoms. Prevalences of the individual symptoms were statistically evaluated regarding cleft type and gender by using the chi-square test and were also compared with findings in patients without clefts. RESULTS: In 97.7% of the patients with clefts, at least one symptom was found. Microdontia of individual teeth, hypodontia, and hyperodontia were the symptoms most frequently recorded. Comparison of the different cleft types revealed differences regarding the prevalences of supernumerary lateral incisors (p = .051), infraposition of deciduous molars (p < .001), and atypical tooth bud position (p = .030). Comparison of the prevalences of 10 symptoms recorded in the patients with clefts with the prevalences recorded in patients without clefts showed nine symptoms were found much more frequently in the population with clefts. CONCLUSION: These findings support the hypothesis that clefting is part of a complex malformation associated with other dental anomalies resulting from disturbed development of the dentition. Patients with clefts are also likely to present other deficiencies of dental development and tooth eruption in both dentitions, even in regions not affected by the cleft.     

Assoziierte Anomalien bei Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumen-Spalten

Background. Retrospective studies of cleft lip and palate patients suggest a multifactorial aetiology for this condition. Many patients exhibit multiple defects, often removed from the orofacial region. The frequency and location of such coexistent abnormalities vary between studies. Patients. A retrospective case-note study of 1,737 individuals with orofacial cleft, treated between 1974 and 1998 at our centre, was undertaken to assess the frequency of associated malformations and syndromes. Results. Associated malformations were found to be present in 33% of all cases investigated. In nearly one half of these individuals (48%), defects could be attributed to recognisable syndromes. Patients with isolated palatal clefts (45.6%) and those with bilateral clefts of the lip and palate (35.3%) were particularly well-represented. The following problems were observed relatively frequently: Cerebral anomalies (16%), facial anomalies (14%), heart malformations (15%), anomalies of the extremities (9%) and urogenital tract abnormalities (8%). In contrast, endocrine aberrations were identified sporadically (0.5%). A partial situs inversus was found only in one case. Conclusion. As clefts of the lip and palate are frequently associated with additional malformations, the importance of thorough interdisciplinary neonatal screening cannot be over emphasised.     

An epidemiological study of orofacial clefts in Croatia 1988-1998.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this epidemiological study was to assess the incidence at birth of orofacial clefts in Croatia. AIM: The aim of the present study was to analyse the character and incidence of orofacial clefts in Croatia and to compare the data with reports from other countries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All the material for the epidemiological study was retrieved from the documented files from all the neonatal units and hospitals in Croatia providing surgical treatment. RESULTS: A total of 525,298 livebirths were documented during 11 years (1988-1998); 903 among them with orofacial clefts, 24 (2.7%) of them twins. Sixty (6.6%) infants died between birth and the age of 6 months. The incidence of orofacial clefts during the study period was 1.71 per thousand. When eliminating syndromic clefts, the incidence of non-syndromic clefts was 1.56 per thousand. Analysis of cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL+/-P) and isolated cleft palate only (CP) revealed their incidence to be 1.05 and 0.66 per 1000, respectively. Of all types of clefting, CL and CLA was found in 17.2%, CL+/-P in 43.9%, CP in 38.2% and atypical facial clefts (AFC) in 0.8% of children. Left-sided clefts were most common (51%), followed by bilateral (30.5%) and right-sided (18.5%) clefts. The male to female ratio was 1.3. CL+/-P predominated in male and CP in female children. In 220 cases (24.4%) orofacial clefts were either associated with other anomalies or the clefts occurred as one feature of a syndrome. CONCLUSION: Data obtained from different sources yielded a cleft incidence of 1.71 per 1000 in Croatia. There were no differences in the incidences of orofacial clefts in comparison with similar data from other European countries.     

Centre-based statistics of cleft lip with/without alveolus and palate as well as cleft palate only patients in Aden,Yemen

ObjectiveThe purpose of the study was to report the types and patterns of cleft lip with/without cleft alveolus and palate as well as cleft palate only as seen in Aden, Yemen.Design and settingRetrospective, centre-based study conducted at the Cleft Lip and Palate Centre, Aden University, Yemen.Material and methodsStatistical evaluation of the data from all cleft patients who were registered at or referred to this centre during the years 2005–2011.ResultsA total of 1110 cleft patients were seen during the period studied (2005–2011). Amongst these there were 183 (16.48%) with a cleft lip and 144 (12.98) with a cleft of lip and alveolus, 228 (20.54%) had a cleft palate, and 555 (50%) had a combination of cleft lip, alveolus, and palate. The clefts were found more often in males than in females (56.5% boys versus 43.5% girls). This difference was statistically significant (p ≤ 0.001). Statistically significant sex differences were also noted when evaluating the various cleft types. Isolated cleft palates were found most often in females. Among the cleft palate cases there were 102 (9.2%) with a cleft soft palate only. The ages of the patients were between one day and 40 years.Two hundred and one children (18%) had a positive family history of clefts. Among the risk factors considered in this study, consanguineous marriages among cousins were found most frequently (in 48% of the cases). In contrast to this, only 10% of the mothers had reported to have been taking medication directly prior to or during the first trimester of their pregnancy. On average the mothers were neither very young nor very old.ConclusionThe prevalence rate of orofacial cleft types among this Yemeni sample was similar to prevalence rates previously reported in white Caucasians. The present study did neither find many cases with medication before, nor during, pregnancy; there were few young or very old mothers; and the incidence of positive family histories was similar to those found in other studies on clefts. However, consanguineous marriages were encountered quite often.