The incretin system and its role in type 2 diabetes mellitus

The incretin hormones are released during meals from gut endocrine cells. They potentiate glucose-induced insulin secretion and may be responsible for up to 70% of postprandial insulin secretion. The incretin hormones include glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), both of which may also promote proliferation/neogenesis of beta cells and prevent their decay (apoptosis). Both hormones contribute to insulin secretion from the beginning of a meal and their effects are progressively amplified as plasma glucose concentrations rise. The current interest in the incretin hormones is due to the fact that the incretin effect is severely reduced or absent in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In addition, there is hyperglucagonaemia, which is not suppressible by glucose. In such patients, the secretion of GIP is near normal, but its effect on insulin secretion, particularly the late phase, is severely impaired. The loss of GIP action is probably a consequence of diabetes, since it is also observed in patients with diabetes secondary to chronic pancreatitis, in whom the incretin effect is also lost. GLP-1 secretion, on the other hand, is also impaired, but its insulinotropic and glucagon-suppressive actions are preserved, although the potency of GLP-1 in this respect is decreased compared to healthy subjects. However, in supraphysiological doses, GLP-1 administration may completely normalize beta as well as alpha cell sensitivity to glucose. The impaired action of GLP-1 and GIP in T2DM may be at least partly restored by improved glycaemic control, as shown in studies involving 4 weeks of intensive insulin therapy. The reduced incretin effect is believed to contribute to impaired regulation of insulin and glucagon secretion in T2DM, and, in support of this, exogenous GLP-1 administration may restore blood glucose regulation to near normal levels. Thus, the pathogenesis of T2DM seems to involve a dysfunction of both incretins. Enhancement of incretin action may therefore represent a therapeutic solution. Clinical strategies therefore include the development of metabolically stable activators of the GLP-1 receptor; and inhibition of DPP-4, the enzyme that destroys native GLP-1 almost immediately. Orally active DPP-4 inhibitors and the metabolically stable activators, exenatide (Byetta), are now on the market, and numerous clinical studies have shown that both principles are associated with durable antidiabetic activity.     

The evolving story of incretins (GIP and GLP-1) in metabolic and cardiovascular disease: A pathophysiological update

The incretin hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) have their main physiological role in augmenting insulin secretion after their nutrient-induced secretion from the gut. A functioning entero-insular (gut-endocrine pancreas) axis is essential for the maintenance of a normal glucose tolerance. This is exemplified by the incretin effect (greater insulin secretory response to oral as compared to “isoglycaemic” intravenous glucose administration due to the secretion and action of incretin hormones). GIP and GLP-1 have additive effects on insulin secretion. Local production of GIP and/or GLP-1 in islet α-cells (instead of enteroendocrine K and L cells) has been observed, and its significance is still unclear. GLP-1 suppresses, and GIP increases glucagon secretion, both in a glucose-dependent manner. GIP plays a greater physiological role as an incretin. In type 2-diabetic patients, the incretin effect is reduced despite more or less normal secretion of GIP and GLP-1. While insulinotropic effects of GLP-1 are only slightly impaired in type 2 diabetes, GIP has lost much of its acute insulinotropic activity in type 2 diabetes, for largely unknown reasons. Besides their role in glucose homoeostasis, the incretin hormones GIP and GLP-1 have additional biological functions: GLP-1 at pharmacological concentrations reduces appetite, food intake, and—in the long run—body weight, and a similar role is evolving for GIP, at least in animal studies. Human studies, however, do not confirm these findings. GIP, but not GLP-1 increases triglyceride storage in white adipose tissue not only through stimulating insulin secretion, but also by interacting with regional blood vessels and GIP receptors. GIP, and to a lesser degree GLP-1, play a role in bone remodelling. GLP-1, but not GIP slows gastric emptying, which reduces post-meal glycaemic increments. For both GIP and GLP-1, beneficial effects on cardiovascular complications and neurodegenerative central nervous system (CNS) disorders have been observed, pointing to therapeutic potential over and above improving diabetes complications. The recent finding that GIP/GLP-1 receptor co-agonists like tirzepatide have superior efficacy compared to selective GLP-1 receptor agonists with respect to glycaemic control as well as body weight has renewed interest in GIP, which previously was thought to be without any therapeutic potential. One focus of this research is into the long-term interaction of GIP and GLP-1 receptor signalling. A GLP-1 receptor antagonist (exendin [9-39]) and, more recently, a GIP receptor agonist (GIP [3-30] NH₂) and, hopefully, longer-acting GIP receptor agonists for human use will be helpful tools to shed light on the open questions. A detailed knowledge of incretin physiology and pathophysiology will be a prerequisite for designing more effective incretin-based diabetes drugs.     

Incretin dysfunction in type 2 diabetes: Clinical impact and future perspectives

The incretin effect refers to the augmentation of insulin secretion after oral administration of glucose compared with intravenous glucose administration at matched glucose levels. The incretin effect is largely due to the release and action on beta-cells of the gut hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). This system has in recent years had considerable interest due to the success of incretin therapy as a glucose-lowering strategy in type 2 diabetes. In non-diabetic subjects, the incretin effect is responsible for 50–70% of insulin release during oral glucose administration. In type 2 diabetes patients, the incretin effect is impaired and contributes to only 20–35% of the insulin response to oral glucose. The reason for the defective incretin effect in type 2 diabetes has been the subject of many studies. Although the reports in the literature are mixed, most studies of GIP and GLP-1 secretory responses to oral glucose or a mixed meal have shown fairly normal results in type 2 diabetes. In contrast, the insulinotropic effects of both GIP and GLP-1 are impaired in type 2 diabetes with greater suppression of insulin secretion augmentation with GIP than with GLP-1. The suggested causes of these defects are a defective beta-cell receptor expression or post-receptor defects secondary to the diabetes milieu, defective beta-cell function in general resulting in defective incretin effect and genetic factors initiating incretin hormone resistance. Identifying the mechanisms in greater detail would be important for understanding the strengths, weaknesses and efficacy of incretin therapy in individual patients to more specifically target this glucose-lowering therapy.     

Incretin secretion in relation to meal size and body weight in healthy subjects and people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are incretin hormones secreted in response to meal ingestion, thereby enhancing postprandial insulin secretion. Therefore, an attenuated incretin response could contribute to the impaired insulin responses in patients with diabetes mellitus. The aim of the present investigation was to investigate incretin secretion, in obesity and type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and its dependence on the magnitude of the meal stimulus. Plasma concentrations of incretin hormones (total, reflecting secretion and intact, reflecting potential action) were measured during two meal tests (260 kcal and 520 kcal) in eight type 1 diabetic patients, eight lean healthy subjects, eight obese type 2 diabetic patients, and eight obese healthy subjects. Both in diabetic patients and in healthy subjects, significant increases in GLP-1 and GIP concentrations were seen after ingestion of both meals. The incretin responses were significantly higher in all groups after the large meal, compared with the small meal, with correspondingly higher C-peptide responses. Both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients had normal GIP responses, compared with healthy subjects, whereas decreased GLP-1 responses were seen in type 2 diabetic patients, compared with matched obese healthy subjects. Incremental GLP-1 responses were normal in type 1 diabetic patients. Increased fasting concentrations of GIP and an early enhanced postprandial GIP response were seen in obese, compared with lean healthy subjects, whereas GLP-1 responses were the same in the two groups. beta-cell sensitivity to glucose, evaluated as the slope of insulin secretion rates vs. plasma glucose concentration, tended to increase in both type 2 diabetic patients (29%, P = 0.19) and obese healthy subjects (22% P = 0.04) during the large meal, compared with the small meal, perhaps reflecting the increased incretin response. We conclude: 1) that a decreased GLP-1 secretion may contribute to impaired insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes mellitus, whereas GIP and GLP-1 secretion is normal in type 1 diabetic patients; and 2) that it is possible to modulate the beta-cell sensitivity to glucose in obese healthy subjects, and possibly also in type 2 diabetic patients, by giving them a large meal, compared with a small meal.     

Incretins, insulin secretion and Type 2 diabetes mellitus

When glucose is taken orally, insulin secretion is stimulated much more than it is when glucose is infused intravenously so as to result in similar glucose concentrations. This effect, which is called the incretin effect and is estimated to be responsible for 50 to 70% of the insulin response to glucose, is caused mainly by the two intestinal insulin-stimulating hormones, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). Their contributions have been confirmed in mimicry experiments, in experiments with antagonists of their actions, and in experiments where the genes encoding their receptors have been deleted. In patients with Type 2 diabetes, the incretin effect is either greatly impaired or absent, and it is assumed that this could contribute to the inability of these patients to adjust their insulin secretion to their needs. In studies of the mechanism of the impaired incretin effect in Type 2 diabetic patients, it has been found that the secretion of GIP is generally normal, whereas the secretion of GLP-1 is reduced, presumably as a consequence of the diabetic state. It might be of even greater importance that the effect of GLP-1 is preserved whereas the effect of GIP is severely impaired. The impaired GIP effect seems to have a genetic background, but could be aggravated by the diabetic state. The preserved effect of GLP-1 has inspired attempts to treat Type 2 diabetes with GLP-1 or analogues thereof, and intravenous GLP-1 administration has been shown to be able to near-normalize both fasting and postprandial glycaemic concentrations in the patients, perhaps because the treatment compensates for both the impaired secretion of GLP-1 and the impaired action of GIP. Several GLP-1 analogues are currently in clinical development and the reported results are, so far, encouraging.Abbreviations GLP-1 Glucagon-like peptide-1 - GIP glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide - FPG fasting plasma glucose     

Normal secretion and action of the gut incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in young men with low birth weight

CONTEXT: Low birth weight (LBW) is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. An impaired incretin effect was reported previously in type 2 diabetic patients. OBJECTIVE: We studied the secretion and action of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) in young LBW men (n = 24) and matched normal birth weight controls (NBW) (n = 25). RESULTS: LBW subjects were 5 cm shorter but had a body mass index similar to NBW. LBW subjects had significantly elevated fasting and postprandial plasma glucose, as well as postprandial (standard meal test) plasma insulin and C-peptide concentrations, suggestive of insulin resistance. Insulin secretion in response to changes in glucose concentration ("beta-cell responsiveness") during the meal test was similar in LBW and NBW but inappropriate in LBW relative to insulin sensitivity. Fasting and postprandial plasma GLP-1 and GIP levels were similar in the groups. First- and second-phase insulin responses were similar in LBW and NBW during a hyperglycemic clamp (7 mm) with infusion of GLP-1 or GIP, respectively, demonstrating normal action of these hormones on insulin secretion. CONCLUSION: Reduced secretion or action of GLP-1 or GIP does not explain a relative reduced beta-cell responsiveness to glucose or the slightly elevated plasma glucose concentrations observed in young LBW men.     

Effects of meal size and composition on incretin, α-cell, and β-cell responses

The incretins glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) regulate postprandial insulin release from the β-cells. We investigated the effects of 3 standardized meals with different caloric and nutritional content in terms of postprandial glucose, insulin, glucagon, and incretin responses. In a randomized crossover study, 18 subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 6 healthy volunteers underwent three 4-hour meal tolerance tests (small carbohydrate [CH]-rich meal, large CH-rich meal, and fat-rich meal). Non-model-based and model-based estimates of β-cell function and incremental areas under the curve of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, GLP-1, and GIP were calculated. Mixed models and Friedman tests were used to test for differences in meal responses. The large CH-rich meal and fat-rich meal resulted in a slightly larger insulin response as compared with the small CH-rich meal and led to a slightly shorter period of hyperglycemia, but only in healthy subjects. Model-based insulin secretion estimates did not show pronounced differences between meals. Both in healthy individuals and in those with diabetes, more CH resulted in higher GLP-1 release. In contrast with the other meals, GIP release was still rising 2 hours after the fat-rich meal. The initial glucagon response was stimulated by the large CH-rich meal, whereas the fat-rich meal induced a late glucagon response. Fat preferentially stimulates GIP secretion, whereas CH stimulates GLP-1 secretion. Differences in meal size and composition led to differences in insulin and incretin responses but not to differences in postprandial glucose levels of the well-controlled patients with diabetes.     

The ageing entero-insular axis

Summary Ageing is one of the major risk factors for glucose intolerance including impaired glucose tolerance and Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Reduced insulin secretion has been described as part of normal ageing although there is no information on age-related changes in the secretion of the major insulinotropic hormones, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide (7–36 amide) (GLP-1). We assessed the entero-insular axis in 6 young premenopausal and 6 older postmenopausal women following treatment with oral carbohydrate. Insulin and glucose integrated responses were similar in the younger and older groups. Total integrated responses for GIP and GLP-1 were considerably greater in the older subjects. A positive correlation between age and total integrated responses for glucose (r = 0.65; p < 0.02) as well as GLP-1 (r = 0.85; p < 0.001) was seen. We hypothesise that an age-related impairment of insulin secretion to insulinotropic hormones, GIP and GLP-1, contributes to a reduction in glucose tolerance in this age group. The pronounced compensatory increase in postprandial secretion of GIP and GLP-1 provides further evidence not only for the negative feedback relation between incretin and insulin secretion but also for the importance of the entero-insular axis in the regulation of insulin secretion. [Diabetologia (1998) 41: 1309–1313] Received: 14 January 1998 and in revised form: 12 June 1998     

Therapies for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus based on incretin action

Orally ingested glucose leads to a much higher insulin response than intravenous glucose leading to identical postprandial plasma glucose excursions. This phenomenon, termed 'incretin effect' comprises up to 60% of the postprandial insulin secretion and is diminished in type 2 diabetes. The gastrointestinal hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) promote the incretin effect. Type 2 diabetes is characterized by an incretin defect: while GIP does not stimulate insulin secretion, GLP-1 action is still preserved under supraphysiological concentrations. GLP-1 stimulates insulin secretion only under hyperglycaemic conditions, therefore it does not cause hypoglycaemia. Furthermore, GLP-1 inhibits glucagon secretion and delays gastric emptying. In vitro and animal data demonstrated that GLP-1 increases beta cell mass by stimulating islet cell neogenesis and by inhibiting apoptosis of islets. The improvement of beta cell function can be indirectly observed from the increased insulin secretory capacity of humans receiving GLP-1. In contrast to GIP, GLP-1 may represent an attractive therapeutic method for type 2 diabetes due to its multiple effects also including the simulation of satiety in the central nervous system by acting as transmitter or by crossing the blood brain barrier. Native GLP-1 is degraded rapidly upon intravenous or subcutaneous administration and is therefore not feasible for routine therapy. Long-acting GLP-1 analogs (e.g. Liraglutide) and exendin-4 (Exenatide, Byetta) that are resistant to degradation, called 'incretin mimetics' are approved (Exenatide, Byetta) or in clinical trials. DPP-4-inhibitors (e.g. Vildagliptin), Sitagliptin and Saxagliptin) that inhibit the enzyme DPP-4 responsible for incretin degradation are also under study.     

Glucose-induced incretin hormone release and inactivation are differently modulated by oral fat and protein in mice

Monounsaturated fatty acids, such as oleic acid (OA), and certain milk proteins, especially whey protein (WP), have insulinotropic effects and can reduce postprandial glycemia. This effect may involve the incretin hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). To explore this, we examined the release and inactivation of GIP and GLP-1 after administration of glucose with or without OA or WP through gastric gavage in anesthetized C57BL/6J mice. Insulin responses to glucose (75 mg) were 3-fold augmented by addition of WP (75 mg; P < 0.01), which was associated with enhanced oral glucose tolerance (P < 0.01). The insulin response to glucose was also augmented by addition of OA (34 mg; P < 0.05) although only 1.5-fold and with no associated increase in glucose elimination. The slope of the glucose-insulin curve was increased by OA (1.7-fold; P < 0.05) and by WP (4-fold; P < 0.01) compared with glucose alone, suggesting potentiation of glucose-stimulated insulin release. WP increased GLP-1 secretion (P < 0.01), whereas GIP secretion was unaffected. OA did not affect GIP or GLP-1 secretion. Nevertheless, WP increased the levels of both intact GIP and intact GLP-1 (both P < 0.01), and OA increased the levels of intact GLP-1 (P < 0.05). WP inhibited dipeptidyl peptidase IV activity in the proximal small intestine by 50% (P < 0.05), suggesting that luminal degradation of WP generates small fragments, which are substrates for dipeptidyl peptidase IV and act as competitive inhibitors. We therefore conclude that fat and protein may serve as exogenous regulators of secretion and inactivation of the incretin hormones with beneficial influences on glucose metabolism.     

Incretin hormone secretion in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: roles of obesity, insulin sensitivity, and treatment with metformin

In normal subjects, the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are responsible for 70% of the insulin response during a meal; but in diabetic subjects and other insulin-resistant conditions, the incretin effect is impaired. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is associated with insulin resistance, and the pathophysiologic mechanisms behind PCOS resemble those of type 2 diabetes mellitus; therefore, women with PCOS may have alterations in the incretin hormone response. Metformin is widely used in the treatment of both type 2 diabetes mellitus and PCOS. Metformin may exert some of its effect on glucose metabolism by increasing GLP-1 biosynthesis and secretion and thereby increasing the incretin effect. The objective of the study was to measure incretin hormone secretion in women with PCOS and to evaluate the effect of metformin treatment. Cross-sectional comparison of 40 women with PCOS (19 lean and 21 obese) and 26 healthy control women (9 lean and 17 obese) and longitudinal evaluation of the effects of 8 months of metformin 1000 mg twice daily in women with PCOS were performed. Plasma concentrations of GIP and GLP-1 were determined frequently during a 75-g glucose tolerance test, and insulin sensitivity was evaluated by the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. The incretin hormone response did not differ between subjects with and without PCOS. Subgroup analysis showed lower GIP (area under the curve [AUC]) levels in obese women with PCOS compared with obese control women (P < .05) and compared with lean women with PCOS (P < .05). Metformin increased GIP (AUC) and GLP-1 (AUC) in lean women with PCOS (P < .05), and a similar trend was seen in the obese women (P = .07). The GIP secretion is attenuated in obese women with PCOS, whereas treatment with metformin increases the levels of both GIP and GLP-1 in women with PCOS.     

Diabetes remission after bariatric surgery: is it just the incretins?

Gastric bypass surgery (GBP) results in important and sustained weight loss and remarkable improvement of Type 2 diabetes. The favorable change in the incretin gut hormones is thought to be responsible, in part, for diabetes remission after GBP, independent of weight loss. However, the relative role of the change in incretins and of weight loss is difficult to differentiate. After GBP, the plasma concentrations of the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide increase postprandially by three- to fivefold. The postprandial incretin effect on insulin secretion, blunted in diabetes, improves rapidly after the surgery. In addition to the change in incretins, the pattern of insulin secretion in response to oral glucose changes after GBP, with recovery of the early phase and significant decrease in postprandial glucose levels. These changes were not seen after an equivalent weight loss by diet. The improved insulin release and glucose tolerance after GBP were shown by others to be blocked by the administration of a GLP-1 antagonist, demonstrating that the favorable metabolic changes after GBP are, in part, GLP-1 dependent. The improved incretin levels and effect persist years after GBP, but their long-term effect on glucose metabolism, and on hypoglycemia post GBP are yet unknown. Understanding the mechanisms by which incretin release is exaggerated postprandially after GBP may help develop new less invasive treatment options for obesity and diabetes. Changes in rate of eating, gastric emptying, intestinal transit time, nutrient absorption and sensing, as well as bile acid metabolism, may all be implicated.     

Glucagon-like peptide-1: from extract to agent. The Claude Bernard Lecture, 2005

The incretin hormones are intestinal polypeptides that enhance postprandial insulin secretion. Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) was initially thought to regulate gastric acid secretion, whereas glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) was discovered as a result of a systematic search for intestinal insulinotropic products of proglucagon gene expression. The incretin effect is markedly impaired or absent in patients with type 2 diabetes because of decreased secretion of GLP-1 and a loss of the insulinotropic effects of GIP. Metabolic control can be restored or greatly improved by administration of exogenous GLP-1, but this peptide is almost immediately degraded by dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV), and therefore has little clinical value. DPP-IV-resistant analogues (incretin mimetics) have been identified or developed, and inhibitors of DPP-IV have also proved effective in protecting endogenous GLP-1 (and GIP) from degradation. Both principles have been tested in clinical studies. The incretin mimetics, administered by sc injection, have demonstrated lasting improvement in HbA₁c in patients insufficiently treated with conventional oral therapy, and their use has been associated with steady weight loss for up to 2 years. The DPP-IV inhibitors, given once or twice daily by mouth, also appear to provide lasting improvement in HbA₁c, but are weight-neutral. The first incretin mimetic has reached the market in the US, and applications for approval of the first inhibitors are expected to be filed early in 2006.     

Altered pattern of the incretin effect as assessed by modelling in individuals with glucose tolerance ranging from normal to diabetic

Aims/hypothesis

Oral glucose elicits a higher insulin secretory response than intravenous glucose at matched glucose concentrations. This potentiation, known as the incretin effect, is typically expressed as the difference between the total insulin response to oral vs intravenous glucose. This approach does not describe the dynamics of insulin secretion potentiation. We developed a model for the simultaneous analysis of oral and isoglycaemic intravenous glucose responses to dissect the impact of hyperglycaemia and incretin effect on insulin secretion and beta cell function.

Methods

Fifty individuals (23 with normal glucose tolerance [NGT], 17 with impaired glucose tolerance [IGT] and ten with type 2 diabetes) received an OGTT and an isoglycaemic test with measurement of plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). Our model featured an incretin potentiation factor (P_INCR) for the dose–response function relating insulin secretion to glucose concentration, and an effect on early secretion (rate sensitivity).

Results

In NGT, P_INCR rapidly increased and remained sustained during the whole OGTT (mean P_INCR?>?1, p?<?0.009). The increase was transient in IGT and virtually absent in diabetes. Mean P_INCR was significantly but loosely correlated with GLP-1 AUC (r?=?0.49, p?<?0.006), while the relationship was not significant for GIP. An incretin effect on rate sensitivity was present in all groups (p?<?0.002).

Conclusions/interpretation

The onset of the incretin effect is rapid and sustained in NGT, transient in IGT and virtually absent in diabetes. The profiles of the incretin effect are poorly related to those of the incretin hormones.     

The Contribution of Enteroinsular Hormones to the Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

The gastrointestinal hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), termed incretins, are essential regulators of normal glucose homeostasis. Research indicates that the incretin effect is impaired in type 2 diabetes, and this seems to be a consequence rather than a cause of type 2 diabetes. This review describes the defects in the incretin system seen in diabetic patients and discusses the potential roles of GIP and GLP-1 in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. In addition, new information on clinical applications that exploit the enteroinsular axis to control blood glucose is discussed.     

肠促胰素在2型糖尿病治疗中的作用

肠促胰素是经食物刺激后由肠道细胞分泌入血、具有促进胰岛素分泌作用的一类激素;人体中,胰升糖素样肽1(GLP-1)和糖依赖性胰岛素释放肽(GIP)发挥肠促胰素效应.根据近期发表的研究,本文回顾了肠促胰素的生理作用,同时阐述了 GIP和GLP-1在2型糖尿病治疗中的特点.     

The pathophysiology of diabetes involves a defective amplification of the late-phase insulin response to glucose by glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide-regardless of etiology and phenotype

The effect of the insulinotropic incretin hormone, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), is preserved in typical middle-aged, obese, insulin-resistant type 2 diabetic patients, whereas a defective amplification of the so-called late-phase plasma insulin response (20-120 min) to glucose by the other incretin hormone, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), is seen in these patients. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate plasma insulin and C-peptide responses to GLP-1 and GIP in five groups of diabetic patients with etiology and phenotype distinct from the obese type 2 diabetic patients. We studied (six in each group): 1) patients with diabetes mellitus secondary to chronic pancreatitis; 2) lean type 2 diabetic patients (body mass index < 25 kg/m(2)); 3) patients with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults; 4) diabetic patients with mutations in the HNF-1alpha gene [maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY)3]; and 5) newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic patients. All participants underwent three hyperglycemic clamps (2 h, 15 mM) with continuous infusion of saline, 1 pmol GLP-1 (7-36)amide/kg body weight.min or 4 pmol GIP pmol/kg body weight.min. The early-phase (0-20 min) plasma insulin response tended to be enhanced by both GIP and GLP-1, compared with glucose alone, in all five groups. In contrast, the late-phase (20-120 min) plasma insulin response to GIP was attenuated, compared with the plasma insulin response to GLP-1, in all five groups. Significantly higher glucose infusion rates were required during the late phase of the GLP-1 stimulation, compared with the GIP stimulation. In conclusion, lack of GIP amplification of the late-phase plasma insulin response to glucose seems to be a consequence of diabetes mellitus, characterizing most, if not all, forms of diabetes.     

Ethanol with a mixed meal decreases the incretin levels early postprandially and increases postprandial lipemia in type 2 diabetic patients

Increased postprandial lipemia is a risk marker of cardiovascular disease (CVD). While moderate alcohol drinking is associated with a reduced risk of CVD in nondiabetic and type 2 diabetic patients, it is also known that alcohol increases postprandial triacylglycerol levels. The incretins, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), are important hormones from the gut that enhance nutrient-stimulated insulin secretion. Their responses to a moderate alcohol dose in type 2 diabetes have not previously been studied. We sought to determine how alcohol influences postprandial lipid and incretin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes when taken in combination with a fat-rich mixed meal. Eleven patients with type 2 diabetes ingested on 3 separate days in random order 3 different meals containing: 100 g butter alone or 100 g butter in combination with 40 g alcohol and 50 g carbohydrate, or 100 g butter and 120 g carbohydrate. The meal with alcohol and 50 g carbohydrate was isocaloric to that of 120 g carbohydrate. Triacylglycerol levels were measured after separation by ultracentrifugation into a chylomicron-rich fraction with Svedberg flotation unit values (Sf) > 1,000, and a chylomicron-poor fraction with Sf < 1,000. Supplementation of a fat-rich mixed meal with alcohol in type 2 diabetic subjects suppressed GLP-1 early in the postprandial phase and increased the late triacylglycerol responses compared with the 2 other meals. In the chylomicron-rich fraction, both triacylglycerol and cholesterol were increased by alcohol. No significant differences in high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels were seen. Isocaloric amounts of carbohydrate and alcohol suppressed equally the postprandial free fatty acid levels, but carbohydrate increased the postprandial glucose, GIP, and insulin levels the most. Early in the postprandial phase, alcohol suppresses the incretin responses and increases the late postprandial triacylglycerol levels in type 2 diabetic patients. Whether this reflects an alcohol-induced suppression of the incretin response, which adds to the alcohol-induced impairment of triacylglycerol clearance in type 2 diabetic patients, remains to be elucidated.     

Valine pyrrolidide preserves intact glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and improves abnormal glucose tolerance in minipigs with reduced beta-cell mass

The incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are important in blood glucose regulation. However, both incretin hormones are rapidly degraded by the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV). The concept of DPPIV inhibition as a treatment for type 2 diabetes was evaluated in a new large animal model of insulin-deficient diabetes and reduced beta-cell mass, the nicotinamide (NIA) (67 mg/kg) and streptozotocin (STZ) (125 mg/kg)-treated minipig, using the DPPIV inhibitor, valine pyrrolidide (VP) (50 mg/kg). VP did not significantly affect levels of intact GLP-1 but increased levels of intact GIP (from 4543 +/- 1880 to 9208 +/- 3267 pM x min; P <.01), thus improving glucose tolerance (area under the curve [AUC] for glucose reduced from 1904 +/- 480 to 1582 +/- 353 mM x min; P =.05). VP did not increase insulin levels during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) but increased the insulinogenic index in normal animals (from 83 +/- 42 to 192 +/- 108; P <.05), but not after NIA + STZ, possibly because of less residual insulin secretory capacity in these animals. GIP seems to contribute to the antihyperglycemic effect of VP in this model; however, additional mechanisms for the effect of DPPIV inhibition cannot be excluded. The authors conclude that DPPIV inhibitors may be useful to treat type 2 diabetes, even when this is due to reduced beta-cell mass.