Exploring the reasons for low pertussis vaccine effectiveness in Ontario,Canada, 2006–2008: a Canadian Immunization Research Network study

ObjectivesAlthough pertussis vaccines have been widely used for many decades, a burden of illness persists. Resurgences in Ontario, Canada, have not been substantial in the past decade, but an outbreak of pertussis occurred in Toronto between 1 October 2005 and 31 March 2006. Previous Ontario studies found high vaccine effectiveness (VE) in the initial years post-immunization. In order to explore the impact of outbreaks and external factors on VE, we investigated pertussis VE during the period 2006–2008.MethodsWe assessed pertussis VE using a frequency-matched case-control study for the period 1 March 2006 to 31 December 2008. We used logistic regression to estimate VE by age, time since last vaccination, and vaccination status according to the Ontario recommended schedule. We compared analyses including and excluding cases from Toronto, and to two recent Ontario pertussis VE studies.ResultsWe included 1797 confirmed cases and 7188 matched controls. Most cases were under 4 years of age during the study period. Pertussis VE was 3.8% (95% CI: − 21.0, 24.0) in the period 15–364 days following the last pertussis vaccine dose, and increased with increasing time since vaccination. Pertussis VE in the first 15–364 days excluding Toronto increased to 57.1% (95% CI: 26.0, 75.1), but the trend of increasing VE with time since vaccination persisted. Although VE was higher in older (6–11 years) than younger (0–5 years) children, it was lower at 12–13 years than after 14 years.ConclusionVE was lower in comparison with other studies conducted in Ontario, particularly in younger children. Various factors occurring during the study period may have influenced the results, including clinical testing of asymptomatic contacts, laboratory testing and methods and reporting practice, and a sensitive case definition. Further studies are needed to optimize methods for measuring VE to inform pertussis vaccine policy.     

Pertussis burden and acellular pertussis vaccine effectiveness in high risk children

BackgroundPertussis hospitalisation is more common among infants born prematurely, who have significant comorbidities, or are Indigenous, but acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates in these sub-groups are lacking. We measured aP VE by Indigenous status, and policy-relevant categories of prematurity and comorbidity, in a population-based Australian cohort.MethodsPerinatal, disease notification, hospitalisation, mortality, and vaccination data were linked to birth records in two Australian states (Western Australia and New South Wales) 2001–2012, with follow-up to the end of 2013. Children followed to 18 months of age were stratified by Aboriginality, prematurity (<32 vs 32–<37 weeks gestation) and comorbidities identified from hospital discharge coding. Rates, rate ratios and VE were calculated for first episode of hospitalised and non-hospitalised pertussis notifications using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsAmong >1,300,000 children, 63,867 (4·9%) were Aboriginal, 47,721 (3·6%) had at least one comorbidity and 3,771 first episodes of notified pertussis occurred <18 months of age; of these, 1,207 (32.0%) had an associated pertussis-coded hospitalisation. For hospitalised pertussis in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children, there was significant protection post dose 1 (VE 51% v 25%), 2 (VE 69% v 74%) and 3 (VE 76% v 80%). For children with co-morbidities, VE for hospitalised pertussis was low and non-significant post dose 1 (0%) and 2 (30%). Post dose 3, VE was significant for hospitalised pertussis (70%; 95% CI 29–87) but not for non-hospitalised pertussis (24%; 95% CI ?49 to 61).ConclusionsFor most Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children, improved timeliness of current infant doses and higher antenatal coverage should further improve protection against pertussis of any severity. For children at highest risk of severe pertussis (born <32 weeks gestation or with significant medical comorbidities), our data suggest that additional measures-such as extra doses of pertussis-containing vaccines and/or vaccines with improved immunogenicity–are needed for protection.     

Estimates of pertussis vaccine effectiveness in United States air force pediatric dependents

BackgroundPertussis vaccination compliance is critical for reduction in the prevalence of disease; however, the current acellular pertussis vaccine may not provide sufficient protection from infection. This study examined acellular pertussis vaccine effectiveness (VE) for Air Force dependents less than 12 years of age.MethodsWe conducted a case-control study among Air Force pediatric dependents from 2011 to 2013, comparing cases with positive pertussis test results to controls who received the same lab tests with a negative result. Our study population was categorized by age group and vaccination status based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended pertussis vaccination schedule. VE was calculated with respect to vaccination status and pertussis lab results.ResultsWe compared 27 pertussis laboratory positive cases with 974 pertussis laboratory negative controls, 2 months to <12 years old. Comparing completely vaccinated to non-vaccinated patients, the overall VE was 78.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 48.6, 90.8; p < 0.001). VE was highest among those 15 months to <6 years old: 97.6% (95% CI: 78.5, 99.7; p < 0.001). Children 6 to <12 years old had the lowest VE: 48.5% (95% CI: −74.0, 84.7; p = 0.28). Comparing partially vaccinated patients to nonvaccinated patients yielded 64.2% (95% CI: −7.2, 88.1; p = 0.06) overall VE.ConclusionsAcellular pertussis vaccination was effective at preventing laboratory confirmed pertussis among our Air Force pediatric dependent population, with highest protection among completely vaccinated, young children. Older children received the lowest amount of protection. Partial vaccination had near significant protection. Our overall calculated pertussis VE corroborates other pertussis VE studies looking at similar age groups.     

A multisite study of pertussis vaccine effectiveness by time since last vaccine dose from three Canadian provinces: A Canadian Immunization Research Network study

BackgroundPertussis remains poorly controlled relative to other diseases targeted by childhood vaccination programs. We combined estimates from four population-based studies of pertussis vaccine effectiveness (VE) in three Canadian provinces using a meta-analytic approach to improve precision and explore regional variation in VE and durability of protection.MethodsStudies were conducted in Alberta, Manitoba, and Ontario over periods ranging from 1996 to 2015. Adjusted log odds ratios (OR; VE = 100*[1-OR]) of the effect of vaccination on pertussis risk were estimated by time since last vaccination in each study and pooled using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models. We used the I² statistic to estimate between-study heterogeneity and assessed methodological and clinical heterogeneity through subgroup analyses of study design and age.ResultsData on 3,270 pertussis cases and 23,863 controls were available. Pertussis VE declined from 86% (95% CI 79%-90%, I² = 81.5%) at < 1 year since last vaccination to 51% (11%-74%, I² = 80.9%) by ≥ 8 years. Effect estimates were the most heterogeneous in the least and most elapsed time periods since last vaccine dose. This was attributable mostly to variation between provinces in the distribution of age groups and number of vaccine doses received within time periods, as well as study design and small numbers in the most elapsed time period.Interpretation: Consistent trends of decreasing pertussis VE with increasing time since last vaccination across three Canadian provinces indicate the need for immunization schedules and vaccine development to optimize protection for all individuals, especially for adolescents and young adults at greatest risk of infection.     

Effectiveness of acellular pertussis vaccine and evolution of pertussis incidence in the community of Madrid from 1998 to 2015

IntroductionPertussis is a communicable disease that primarily affects infants. Vaccination has led to an important reduction in the incidence of the disease, however, resurgence of the disease has been observed. This study aimed to analyze the incidence of pertussis and assess the vaccination effectiveness (VE) of different schedules of acellular pertussis vaccination in the community of Madrid.MethodsPertussis cases notified to the Mandatory Disease Reporting System from 1998 to 2015 were analyzed. Five comparison periods were created: 1998–2001 (reference), 2002–2005, 2006–2009, 2010–2012 and 2013–2015. The incidence ratio (IR) between inter-epidemic periods was analyzed using a Poisson regression. VE was calculated using the screening method. Vaccine status data were collected from the vaccine registry.ResultsIn total, 3855 cases were notified. Inter-epidemic periods were observed every 3–4 years. The incidence increased (IR: 5.99, p < 0.05) in the 2013–2015 period, particularly among infants younger than 1 month (IR: 32.41, p < 0.05). Vaccination data were available in 89% of cases. For those receiving the last dose at ≤6-month VE was 89.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 87.3–92.0) after one year of follow-up, and 85.5% (95% CI: 82.4–88.1) after 11 years of follow-up. For those receiving the last dose at 18-months VE decreased from 98.8% (95% CI: 98.3–99.1) to 85.1% (95% CI: 81.9–87.7) in the same period, and for those receiving the last dose at 4-year VE decreased from 99.6% (95% CI: 99.3–99.7) to 79.3% (95% CI: 74.6–83.1).ConclusionsB. pertussis is circulating in our population, as shown by the epidemic peaks and increased incidence of pertussis in recent years. VE increased with the number of doses and decreased with the follow-up period. The effect of this and other vaccination strategies must be monitored to control the disease.     

Effectiveness of maternal pertussis vaccination in Singapore: A test-negative case-control study

Pertussis vaccination (Tdap -Tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis) for pregnant women has been recommended since November 2017 in Singapore. In this prospective test-negative case-control study from 2018 to 2019, we aimed to evaluate vaccine effectiveness (VE) against pertussis infection and pertussis-related intensive care unit (ICU) admission according to Tdap (Tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis) during pregnancy and/or infant pertussis vaccination. A total of 58 children (26 cases, 32 controls) were recruited with 4 ICU admissions. The median age was 3 months (interquartile range [IQR] 1.50–4.56 months). Overall, 25.9 % of mothers had received antenatal Tdap vaccination and 43.1 % of infants received pertussis vaccination, majority only 1 dose. Tdap in pregnancy alone without infant vaccine or with 0–1 infant dose had a VE of 97.62 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 53.25–99.88 %), 98.17 % (95 %CI 66.61–99.9 %) respectively, against pertussis infection and 71.9 % (95 %CI 0.0–98.64), 75.86 % (95 % CI 0.0–98.78) respectively, against ICU admissions. Conclusion: Maternal Tdap vaccination was highly protective against infant pertussis and should be routinely recommended for all pregnant women.     

A nested case-control study measuring pertussis vaccine effectiveness and duration of protection in Manitoba,Canada, 1992–2015: A Canadian Immunization Research Network Study

BackgroundPertussis persists in Manitoba despite the universal availability of pertussis vaccines. Recent cases have included previously vaccinated individuals, raising concerns about declining vaccine effectiveness (VE). We measured pertussis VE and duration of protection using Manitoba’s provincial immunization and communicable disease registries.MethodsUsing a nested case-control design, individuals with laboratory-confirmed pertussis in Manitoba diagnosed between April 1, 1992, and March 31, 2015, were matched to up to five population-based controls on age, gender, geography, and case physician or number of physician visits. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate VE against pertussis for both the whole-cell (wP) and acellular (aP) pertussis vaccines. Duration of protection was assessed using time since last dose.ResultsData on 534 eligible cases and 2614 controls were available for analysis. The adjusted VE estimate for aP-containing vaccines was 85% (95%CI: 74–91%); VE was 89% (66–96%) one to three years after the last vaccination. The adjusted VE of wP-containing vaccines was –15% (–91–31%) during a large outbreak in 1994 and 1995 compared to 35% (–26–66%) during non-outbreak years.ConclusionsOur estimates suggest that the aP vaccine was effective in preventing pertussis since its introduction in Manitoba. VE was lower during a large outbreak, highlighting the importance of separately analyzing outbreak periods when estimating pertussis VE over time.     

Pertussis epidemiology including direct and indirect effects of the childhood pertussis booster vaccinations,Norway, 1998–2019

BackgroundThe acellular pertussis vaccine has been used in the Norwegian national immunisation program since 1998. Following an increase in pertussis incidence in all age groups, booster doses were introduced for 7–8-year-olds in 2006, and for 15–16-year-olds in 2013. We assessed the effects of the booster doses on pertussis incidence in different age groups to inform potential changes in vaccination policy.MethodsWe included all pertussis cases notified to the Norwegian Surveillance System for Communicable Diseases in 1998–2019. We calculated annual incidence rates (IR, per 100,000 inhabitants) by age group. We estimated average annual changes in IRs (incidence rate ratios, IRR) for each age group for 2006–2012 and 2013–2019 using Poisson regression.ResultsIn 1998–2019, 74,675 cases of pertussis were notified. Coinciding with booster introduction, between 2006 and 2012 the IR decreased among 8–15-year-olds (from 433 to 199/100,000, IRR 0.89 [95% confidence interval 0.88–0.90]). A similar decrease was seen between 2013 and 2019 among 16–19-year-olds (from 171 to 77/100,000, IRR 0.84 [0.82–0.86]). There was no significant change in IRs among children < 1 year of age between 2006 and 2012 (IRR 0.99 [0.95–1.04]) or 2013–2019 (IRR 0.96 [0.91–1.02]). The IR decreased in both periods among adults aged 20–39 and 40+ (IRR 0.94 [0.93–0.95] and 0.92 [0.91–0.92] in 2006–2012; IRR 0.97 [0.96–0.99] and 0.97 [0.96–0.99] in 2013–2019, respectively). Despite steady, high vaccination coverage, in 2013–2019, there was an increase in the IR among children aged 1–7 (63 to 86/100,000, IRR 1.05 [1.03–1.07]) and 8–15 years (88 to 122/100,000, IRR 1.08 [1.06–1.10]).ConclusionsPertussis booster doses have offered direct protection in the targeted age groups. Our findings suggest indirect protection in adults, while the incidence in infants hasn’t changed. The recent increase in IRs among 1–15-year-olds warrants close monitoring and further evaluation of the vaccination schedule.     

NSW annual immunisation coverage report, 2010

This annual report, the second in the series, documents trends in immunisation coverage in NSW for children, adolescents and the elderly, to the end of 2010. Methods: Data from the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register, the NSW School Immunisation Program and the NSW Population Health Survey were used to calculate various measures of population coverage, coverage for Aboriginal children and vaccination timeliness for all children. Results: Over 90% coverage has been reached for children at 12 and 24 months of age. For children at 5 years of age there was an improvement during 2010 in timeliness for vaccines due at 4 years and coverage almost reached 90%. Delayed receipt of vaccines is still an issue for Aboriginal children. For adolescents, there is good coverage for the first and second doses of human papillomavirus vaccine and the dose of diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis. The pneumococcal vaccination rate in the elderly has been steadily rising, although it has remained lower than the influenza coverage estimates. Conclusion: Completion of the recommended immunisation schedule at the earliest appropriate age should be the next public health goal at both the state and local health district level. Official coverage assessments for 'fully immunised' should include the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate and meningococcal C vaccines, and wider dissemination should be considered.     

Durability of protection after 5 doses of acellular pertussis vaccine among 5–9 year old children in King County,Washington

PurposeWaning of immunity after vaccination with the acellular Pertussis (aP) vaccine has been proposed as one of the main reasons for pertussis resurgence in the US. In this study, we estimated time-varying vaccine effectiveness after 5 doses of aP vaccine.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study among children 5–9 years old (born between 2008 and 2012) living in King County, Washington, USA, who participated in the Washington State Immunization Information System. We estimated time-varying vaccine effectiveness after 5 doses of aP using smoothed scaled Schoenfeld residuals obtained from fitting Cox proportional hazards models to the data as well as piecewise constant Poisson regression.ResultsThere were 55 pertussis cases in this cohort, of whom 22 (40%) were fully-vaccinated and 33 (60%) were under-vaccinated. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) remained high for up to 42 months after the fifth dose (VE(t) = 89%; 95% CI: 64%, 97%) as estimated using survival analysis methods and up to 4 years (VE(t) = 93%; 95% CI: 67%, 98%) as estimated using Poisson regression.ConclusionWe did not find evidence for waning of vaccine effectiveness for up to four years after 5 doses of aP among 5 –9 years old children in King County, WA.     

Acellular pertussis vaccine effectiveness and waning immunity in Alberta,Canada: 2010–2015, a Canadian Immunization Research Network (CIRN) study

BackgroundPertussis is still frequently reported in Canada. In Alberta, pertussis incidence ranged from 1.8 to 20.5 cases per 100,000 persons for 2004–2015. Most cases occurred in those aged <15 years. In Alberta, acellular formulations replaced whole-cell in 1997. We investigated pertussis vaccine effectiveness (VE) using a test-negative design (TND) study.MethodsWe included all persons who had a real-time PCR laboratory test for Bordetella pertussis between January 1, 2010 and August 31, 2015, in the province of Alberta, Canada. Vaccination history was obtained from Alberta’s immunization repository. Vaccination status was classified as complete, incomplete, or unvaccinated, based on the province’s vaccination schedule. Persons who had received ≥one dose of whole cell vaccine were excluded from analysis. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for pertussis infection by time since last vaccination. We adjusted for vaccination status, age, sex, neighbourhood income, urban/rural status, and the presence of a co-morbid condition. VE was calculated as [(1 − aOR) * 100].ResultsOf the 12,149 tests available, 936 (7.7%) were positive for Bordetella pertussis. Among the full cohort, VE was 90% (95% CI 87–92%) at 1 year, 81% (95% CI 77–85%) at 1–3 years, 76% (95% CI 68–82%) at 4–7 years, and 37% (95% CI 11–56%) at 8 or more years since a last dose of acellular pertussis vaccine.ConclusionsPertussis VE was highest in the first year after vaccination, then declined noticeably as years since a last vaccination increased. Our results suggest that a large number of adolescents and adults are susceptible to infection with Bordetella pertussis. Regular boosters throughout childhood, adolescence, and during pregnancy may be needed.     

Sustained Transmission of Pertussis in Vaccinated, 1–5-Year-Old Children in a Preschool,Florida, USA

In September 2013, local county health officials in Tallahassee, Florida, USA, were notified of a laboratory-confirmed pertussis case in a 1-year-old preschool attendee. During a 5-month period, 26 (22%) students 1–5 years of age, 2 staff from the same preschool, and 11 family members met the national case definition for pertussis. Four persons during this outbreak were hospitalized for clinical management of pertussis symptoms. Only 5 students, including 2 students with pertussis, had not received the complete series of vaccinations for pertussis. Attack rates in 1 classroom for all students who received the complete series of vaccinations for pertussis approached 50%. This outbreak raises concerns about vaccine effectiveness in this preschool age group and reinforces the idea that recent pertussis vaccination should not dissuade physicians from diagnosing, testing, or treating persons with compatible illness for pertussis.     

Community awareness and predictors of uptake of pertussis booster vaccine in South Australian adults

ObjectivePertussis is a highly virulent vaccine preventable disease that remains a global challenge. This study aimed to assess community knowledge of pertussis infection as well as awareness and uptake of adult pertussis booster vaccine.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted of randomly selected households in South Australia by Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews in 2011. Survey data were weighted to the age, gender and geographical area profile of the population.ResultsFrom 3124 randomly sampled contactable households, 1967 interviews were conducted (participation rate 63%) with individuals aged 18–93 years, including 608 parents of children aged <18 years. The majority of respondents (97%) had heard of pertussis (whooping cough) and 18% reported that a household member had previously contracted whooping cough infection. Most respondents considered whooping cough to be highly contagious (73%) and severe for infants (89%). Over half (51%) of those surveyed were aware that family members commonly transmit pertussis to infants. Despite high knowledge, pertussis vaccine uptake was low, with only 10% of respondents reporting pertussis vaccination in the previous five years. Whilst 61% of respondents were aware of the availability of an adult pertussis booster vaccine, only 8% (n = 154) reported their Family Physician had discussed it with them. If provided free, 77% agreed that they would be more likely to accept a booster pertussis vaccination. Independent predictors of recent pertussis vaccination included higher education, larger household size, perception of greater disease severity for infants and discussion with a Family Physician about pertussis vaccination.ConclusionsWhilst knowledge regarding transmission and severity of Bordetella pertussis was high, uptake of pertussis vaccination for adults is remarkably low amongst the South Australian community. Improved awareness regarding the availability of a booster pertussis vaccine through Family Physicians and/or provision of funded pertussis vaccination for adults has the potential to improve pertussis vaccine coverage.     

Do we need to boost pertussis immunization within the existing UK vaccination schedule?

Pertussis infection is associated with significant morbidity in younger children (<4 years), which can include pneumonia, seizures and encephalopathy. Around one in 250 cases of pertussis in infants under the age of 6 months lead to death or severe brain damage. In the United Kingdom the control of pertussis infection has been based on a three-dose schedule of combined diphtheria, tetanus, whole-cell pertussis vaccine (DTPw) during the first 4 months of life. Coverage rates for primary vaccination are currently at high levels of over 90 per cent and infection rates are relatively low (approximately 1.2 per 100,000). However, there are concerns over the potential under-reporting of pertussis and clear shifts in the age pattern of notified cases are evident, with surveillance data suggesting a possible upward trend in the absolute numbers of infections in those at most risk (i.e. infants <3 months old). The addition of childhood booster dose(s) of pertussis vaccine to the standard schedule has potential clinical benefits and may be cost-effective. Selective adult booster immunization may also have a role to play in controlling the circulation of pertussis.     

Using computer simulations to compare pertussis vaccination strategies in Australia

High levels of notified pertussis in adolescents and adults, persisting severe disease (hospitalization and deaths) in infants despite high childhood immunization coverage, together with the availability of adult-formulated pertussis vaccines, have made alternate strategies for vaccine control of pertussis an important issue in Australia. An age-structured computer simulation model was used to compare the likely effects of adopting different vaccination strategies in Australia on pertussis transmission by age group over a 50 year time period. Epidemiological parameters and vaccination coverage in Australia were estimated from previous pertussis modeling studies and existing data. In the simulations, replacing the pertussis booster at 18 months with a booster dose for adolescents at an age between 12 and 17 years, assuming 80% coverage, led to decreases in pertussis cases of 30% in children of ages 0-23 months (who have the highest complication rates) and of 25% in adolescents, but an increase of 15% in cases in 2-4-year-old children. The simulations did not suggest any shift of pertussis cases into the adult child-bearing years. Varying parameter values in the simulations in a series of sensitivity analyses showed the model predictions to be robust over a plausible range. The results of these simulations suggest that the recent change in the Australian pertussis vaccination schedule, replacing the 18 month dose with a pertussis booster in 15-17-year-old adolescents, is very likely to reduce overall pertussis incidence in Australia without increasing the cost of the current vaccine program.     

Effectiveness of quadrivalent influenza vaccination in the first year of a funded childhood program in Queensland,Australia, 2018

BackgroundFollowing high influenza activity in 2017, the state of Queensland, Australia, funded a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccination program for children aged 6 months to <5 years in 2018. We calculated influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) among children eligible for this program.MethodsA matched case-control study was conducted. Cases were identified using Queensland 2018 influenza notification data among children age-eligible for funded vaccination. Controls were drawn from Australian Immunisation Register records of Queensland resident children age-eligible for funded influenza vaccine. Up to 10 controls per case were matched for location and birthdate. First dose vaccination was valid if received ≥14 days prior to specimen collection; a second dose was valid if received ≥28 days after first dose receipt. VE was calculated for vaccine doses and adherence to national recommendations for two doses in the first season (schedule completeness) and adjusted (VE_adj) for sex and First Nations status.ResultsThere were 1,125 cases and 10,645 matched controls analysed. Overall VE_adj against laboratory-confirmed influenza was 51% (95% confidence interval (CI) 41–60). VE_adj was 60% (95% CI 46–70) for children who received two doses in 2018, and 60% (95% CI 48–69) for children vaccinated appropriately according to schedule completeness. VE increased with age.ConclusionsModerate vaccine effectiveness was observed for children eligible for the funded program in Queensland in 2018, adding to the sparse evidence for influenza vaccine use in Australian children. Adhering to the national first season two dose schedule for influenza vaccine receipt in children ensures maximum protection.     

Age-specific efficacy of pertussis vaccine during epidemic and non-epidemic periods.

A national survey was conducted of 3150 notified cases of whooping cough in order to determine age-specific pertussis vaccine efficacy by the ''screening'' method. The cases were collected over two periods, one just prior to the start and one at the first peak of the whooping cough epidemic of 1989-90. Vaccination status was determined by a postal questionnaire to the reporting doctor and clinical data were also collected to provide efficacy estimates according to standardized case definitions. Overall, observed vaccine efficacy was high but differed between epidemic (87%) and non-epidemic (93%) periods (P = 0.03). Efficacy estimates were generally higher for typical or severe cases than for children with an atypical illness. Vaccine efficacy declined with age (P < 0.01) but estimates remained high up to the age of 8 years. This study will provide baseline data for comparison with efficacy observed from similar studies of children immunized at an accelerated schedule and from phase III studies of acellular pertussis vaccines performed elsewhere.     

Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines in an Australian population: A case-control study

ObjectiveTwo rotavirus vaccines (RV1 and RV5) were included in the publicly funded National Immunisation Program in Australia from July 2007. The programme in Western Australia initially provided RV1 (at ages 2 and 4 months) and then switched to RV5 (at ages 2, 4 and 6 months) from July 2009. This retrospective case-control study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of rotavirus vaccine against laboratory confirmed and notified cases of rotavirus infection among children aged <5 years.MethodsCase-subjects were identified as vaccine-eligible children (born from 1 May 2007) who were notified as having rotavirus infection during the period 2009–2011. The control group was vaccine-eligible children notified as having Campylobacter or Salmonella infection during the same period. Individual rotavirus immunisation status was ascertained from a population-based immunisation register. Full-dose and partial-dose vaccine effectiveness (VE) were calculated for both vaccines using the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of vaccination for cases versus controls (VE = (1 − OR)*100%).ResultsOverall, 282 cases and 883 controls were included. The adjusted VE for a full course of either rotavirus vaccine was 72% (95% CI: 56–82) and 71% (95% CI: 50–84) for partial vaccination (one dose of RV1 or one/two doses of RV5). The VE for a complete 3-dose course of RV5 was 82% (95% CI: 59–92) and for a full 2-dose course of RV1 was 73% (95% CI: 55–83).ConclusionsRV1 and RV5 were both effective in preventing laboratory confirmed and notified rotavirus infections among children aged <5 years. Even incomplete courses of vaccination conferred good protection.     

Age-specific effectiveness following each dose of acellular pertussis vaccine among infants and children in New Zealand

BackgroundThough it is believed the switch from whole cell to acellular pertussis vaccine has contributed to the resurgence of pertussis disease, few studies have evaluated vaccine effectiveness (VE) and duration of protection provided by an acellular vaccine schedule including three primary doses but no toddler-age dose. We assessed this schedule in New Zealand (NZ), a setting with historically high rates of pertussis disease, and low but recently improved immunisation coverage. We further evaluated protection following the preschool-age booster dose.MethodsWe performed a nested case-control study using national-level healthcare data. Hospitalised and non-hospitalised pertussis was detected among children 6 weeks to 7 years of age between January 2006 and December 2013. The NZ National Immunisation Register provided vaccination status for cases and controls. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate dose-specific VE with duration of immunity examined by stratifying VE into ages aligned with the immunisation schedule.ResultsVE against pertussis hospitalisation was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87, 96) following three doses among infants aged 5–11 months who received three compared to zero doses. This protection was sustained through children’s fourth birthdays (VE ⩾ 91%). VE against non-hospitalised pertussis was also sustained after three doses, from 86% (95% CI: 80, 90) among 5–11 month olds to 84% (95% CI: 80, 88) among 3-year-olds. Following the first booster dose at 4 years of age, the protective VE of 93% (95% CI: 90, 95) among 4-year-olds continued through 7 years of age (VE ⩾ 91%).ConclusionsWe found a high level of protection with no reduction in VE following both the primary course and the first booster dose. These findings support a 3-dose primary course of acellular vaccine with no booster dose until 4 years of age.     

Dose-dependent effectiveness of acellular pertussis vaccine in infants: A population-based case-control study

BackgroundPertussis is a vaccine-preventable disease which is most severe in young infants. More than two decades after the introduction of acelluar pertussis vaccines (aPV) in national immunization programs in many countries worldwide, a resurgence of pertussis has been recognized. Suboptimal effectiveness of aPV has been blamed as one major reason but only few studies have evaluated dose-dependent vaccine effectiveness (VE) provided by aPV in current practice.MethodsWe performed a population-based retrospective case-control study by comparing pertussis immunization data of children 2.5 months to 2 years of age hospitalized for pertussis and residing in Switzerland with immunization data of a random control sample of children aged 2 years and residing in Switzerland. VE was defined as the percentage of hospitalizations avoided by number of aPV doses. It was calculated as 1-infection rate ratio (IRR)*100. IRR was calculated by dividing infection rates of vaccinated children and infection rates of unvaccinated children. To get dose specific VE, infection rates were stratified by number doses received.ResultsVE against hospitalization due to pertussis increased significantly with each consecutive aPV dose in a “3 + 1” primary course in infants: 42.1% (95% CI: 11.3–62.6), 83.9% (70.2–92.1), 98.2% (96.1–99.3), and 100% (97.9–100) after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th dose, respectively.ConclusionAcellular pertussis vaccines continue to demonstrate protection against hospitalization due to pertussis in infants and young children. Therefore, together with advancing immunization of pregnant women and household contacts, better control of severe pertussis in young infants can be achieved by timely initiation of immunization.