Sustained virological response following HCV therapy is associated with non-progression of liver fibrosis in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C leads to progressive liver fibrosis, which is accelerated in HIV-coinfected patients. Unfortunately, hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy provides sustained virological response (SVR) to only 40% of coinfected patients. Little is known about the regression of hepatic fibrosis in treated patients. METHODS: All coinfected patients who had completed a full course of HCV therapy at our institution were identified. Liver fibrosis staging was estimated using non-invasive procedures at the time of initiating HCV therapy and reassessed at the last patient's follow-up using elastometry (FibroScan). RESULTS: A total of 103 coinfected patients were identified. HCV genotype distribution was 1 (63%), 3 (29%) and 4 (8%). SVR had been attained by 34 individuals, while the remaining 69 were non-responders and/or relapsers. The mean lag time between the end of HCV therapy and the current assessment of liver fibrosis was 40 months, without differences between groups. Metavir score estimates were comparable before initiating HCV therapy in SVR and non-SVR patients. By contrast, current Metavir scores were lower in SVR than in non-SVR patients; for instance, F3-F4 estimates were 12% versus 54%, respectively (P < 0.001). Moreover, the longer the time elapsed after HCV therapy, the lower the liver fibrosis in SVR patients (rho = -0.39; P = 0.02). Conversely, liver fibrosis staging directly correlated with the lag following HCV therapy in non-SVR patients (rho = 0.25; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: SVR after HCV therapy is associated with non-progression of liver fibrosis in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients, although this benefit may not be universal and improvement only been recognizable after several years of follow-up.     

Impaired response to interferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin in cirrhotic patients with genotype 3a hepatitis C virus infection

Patients with chronic infection with the 3a genotype of hepatitis C virus (HCV) are considered as 'easy-to-treat' with interferon/ribavirin (IFN/RBV), independent of liver disease severity. However, patients with extensive fibrosis or cirrhosis were under-represented in all the registration Phase III trials performed so far. To assess the influence of liver fibrosis on the outcome of anti-HCV therapy, all patients with genotype 3a hepatitis C who were naive to IFN-based therapies, and received RBV combined with standard IFN or pegylated IFN-(alpha2b (peg-IFN-alpha2b) as standard of care for their disease, were investigated at our centre. A sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 68 of 91 patients (75%) independent of IFN type, pretreatment viraemia, clearance of HCV RNA at week 4 and relevant co-morbidities. A SVR was less common in cirrhotics (6 of 17) than in non-cirrhotics (62 of 74; 35% vs 84%; P<0.0005). Compared to non-cirrhotics, the age and sex adjusted odds ratio (OR) of treatment failure for cirrhotics was 10.1 (95% confidence interval: 2.4-41.7). By multivariate analysis, cirrhosis was the only predictor of non-SVR. In conclusion, cirrhosis is an independent predictor of IFN/RBV treatment failure in patients chronically infected with HCV 3a and is associated with an increased risk of post-treatment hepatitis relapse. Evaluation of liver fibrosis is important in the management of patients with genotype 3a hepatitis C, since it helps to predict response to IFN/RBV therapy.     

Estimation of two real-time RT-PCR assays for quantitation of hepatitis C virus RNA during PEG-IFN plus ribavirin therapy by HCV genotypes and IL28B genotype

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA values measured with two real-time PCR methods (Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan, CAP/CTM, and the Abbott real-time PCR test, ART) vary among patients with genotype 1. We investigated HCV RNA values measured by two real-time PCR assays during pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) therapy. We evaluated 185 cases of chronic hepatitis C patients, among which 97 patients received the PEG-IFN/RBV therapy. HCV RNA values of CAP/CTM for genotype 1 were significantly higher than those of ART (p < 0.05) The difference in HCV RNA values (CAP/CTM minus ART) of genotype 1 was significantly higher than those in genotype 2 (p < 0.0001). The positive rate (>0) of the difference of HCV RNA values in genotype 1 was 100 % (55/55), which was significantly higher than the 78.6 % (33/42) of genotype 2 (p < 0.001). There was no difference between TT and TG/GG genotype groups in terms of difference of HCV RNA values (CAP/CTM minus ART). After PEG-IFN/RBV therapy was administered, reduction of HCV measurements was observed from day 1 for both assays regardless of genotype. The HCV value of CAP/CTM during PEG-IFN/RBV therapy was consistently higher than the value of ART, although the difference in these two values gradually became smaller during the course of therapy, and eventually no significant difference was observed near the detection level. No correlation was observed between the sustained virological response (SVR) rate and the difference between the CAP/CTM HCV values and the ART HCV value before treatment.     

Optimizing outcomes in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 or 4

Currently, many decisions for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) are based on genotype, which is the most significant baseline predictor of response to therapy; however, it has become increasingly apparent that fixed treatment durations might not be appropriate for all patients. The use of on-treatment predictors such as rapid virological response (RVR) at week 4 and early virological response (EVR) at week 12 can be used to predict the likelihood of achieving a sustained virological response (SVR), helping to tailor treatment to the individual. Until now, EVR has been defined as achieving either undetectable HCV RNA (< 50 IU/ml) or a > 2 log drop in HCV RNA, but still detectable, at week 12. However, rates of SVR in patients achieving an EVR are heterogeneous. It has recently been suggested that by subdividing EVR into RVR (< 50 IU/ml at week 4), complete EVR (HCV RNA < 50 IU/ml at week 12) or partial EVR (HCV RNA > 2 log drop in HCV RNA but still detectable [> 50 IU/ml] at week 12), it might be possible to further improve the prediction of patients likely to achieve an SVR and may allow for tailoring of treatment duration. Genotype 1 and 4 patients achieving an RVR have high rates of SVR and may be candidates for shorter treatment duration. Patients with a complete EVR achieve high SVR rates with the current treatment duration of 48 weeks, whereas patients achieving a partial EVR have lower rates of SVR and could benefit from treatment intensification to 72 weeks. Here, we discuss the importance of baseline predictors of response and the emerging concept of response-guided therapy in genotype 1 and 4 patients.     

Usefulness of a new immunoradiometric assay of HCV core antigen to predict virological response during PEG-IFN/RBV combination therapy for chronic hepatitis with high viral load of serum HCV RNA genotype 1b

We investigated the clinical usefulness of a new immunoradiometric (IRM) assay of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen in predicting virological response during pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) combination therapy for chronic hepatitis with high viral loads of serum HCV RNA genotype 1b. Thirty-nine patients received a regimen of PEG-IFNalpha-2b (1.5 microg/kg/week s.c.) in combination with RBV (600-1,000 mg/day). Of the 39 patients, 18 (46.2%) achieved sustained virological response (SVR), 11 (28.2%) attained partial response (PR) and 10 (25.6%) showed no response (NR). Four weeks after the start of therapy, 1- and 2-log reductions in the amount of HCV core antigen were observed in 20 (2/10) and 0% (0/10) showing NR, 91 (10/11) and 63.6% (7/11) with PRs, and 88.9 (16/18) and 55.6% (10/18) of patients with SVR, respectively. The 1- and 2-log reductions 4 weeks after the start of therapy were not a defining condition for PR and SVR. The amount of HCV core antigen was significantly different between SVR and PR patients on days 1 and 7, and between patients with NR and SVR at all points of time. In conclusion, this new IRM assay is useful in predicting virological response during PEG-IFN/RBV therapy.     

老年丙型肝炎患者60例抗病毒疗效影响因素分析

目的 分析宿主因素、病毒因素、病毒应答模式以及干扰素(IFNα)种类和用药时间对老年丙型肝炎患者治疗结局的影响,寻找预测老年丙型肝炎患者持续病毒学应答(SVR)的相关因素.方法 回顾性分析2006年1月至2010年10月60例年龄≥60岁丙型肝炎患者的性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、HCV RNA定量及基因型、IFNα种类、病毒应答模式以及病毒阴转后用药时间等因素与SVR的关系.结果 SVR组与非SVR组性别、年龄和BMI无统计学差异;SVR组HCV RNA定量显著低于非SVR组(t=4.209,P=0.022),ALT或AST显著高于非SVR组(t=15.724,P=0.006;t=10.549,P=0.003);HCV RNA定量<1×105 IU/ml组SVR率显著高于HCV RNA定量≥1×105 IU/ml(χ2=6.801,P=0.009);基因1b型SVR率为56.8%,低于非1b型(60.9%);PEG IFNα-2a组SVR率为62.5%,普通IFNα-2a组SVR率为53.6%,两组比较无统计学差异(χ2=0.49,P=0.484);快速病毒学应答(RVR)患者95%获得SVR,早期病毒学应答(EVR)患者68.4%获得SVR;IFN治疗时间≥72周SVR率82.8%,复发率6.9%;HCV RNA定量阴转后用药≥40周患者复发率3.2%.结论 老年患者抗病毒治疗前低HCV RNA定量、ALT及AST≥2倍正常上限(ULN),HCV RNA非1b型患者可获得较高SVR.RVR比EVR患者SVR率高约30%,延长病毒阴转后用药时间可提高SVR.     

The early HCV RNA dynamics in patients with acute hepatitis C treated with pegylated interferon-alpha2b

Interferon and pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) are highly effective in patients with acute hepatitis caused by hepatitis C virus (acute hepatitis C, AHC), but the optimal timing of treatment is still under debate. In this open-labelled, uncontrolled trial, 19 patients with AHC, including 12 intravenous drug users (IVDUs), were treated early in the course of the infection with peg-IFN-alpha2b for 12 weeks. Diagnosis was made according to standardized criteria. The HCV RNA decay was analysed during the first 4 weeks of treatment by quantitative branched-DNA and by qualitative RT-PCR. Of the patients, 11 (58%) had genotype 1. Sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 14 out of 19 patients (74%) and the mean time to achieve a negative RT-PCR for HCV RNA was 2.5 weeks. The SVR was associated by univariate analysis with peg-IFN dosage < or = 1.33 microg/kg/week (P = 0.026) and HCV RNA level at onset of therapy (P = 0.017). Using a logistic regression model, only peg-IFN dosage > or = 1.33 microg/kg/weekly was significantly associated with SVR (P = 0.0379, OR: 14.7; 95% CI: 1.16-185.2). The SVR was 100% and 83.3%, respectively, in genotype 1 and non-1 infected patients treated with a dosage equal to or higher than 1.33 microg/kg, compared with 40% and 50%, respectively, in those who received a lower dosage. Efforts should be made to propose a 12-week treatment with peg-IFN-alpha2b for AHC, and to maximize peg-IFN dosage. Early treatment is associated with early disappearance of HCV RNA.     

Impact of Treatment against Hepatitis C Virus on Overall Survival of Naive Patients with Advanced Liver Disease

The beneficial effect of achieving a sustained virological response (SVR) after antiviral treatment against hepatitis C virus is well established. However, it remains unclear whether unsuccessful treatment (non-SVR) also improves patient survival, especially in patients with advanced liver fibrosis. We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of death or liver transplantation in the 427 naive patients with a Child-Pugh score of A and advanced fibrosis newly admitted to the Hospital Beaujon between 2000 and 2010. Patients were followed for a median time of 5.5 years. The baseline characteristics of untreated (n = 102) and treated (n = 325) patients were largely similar, and there was no evidence of a bias of indication. Treated patients received a combination of interferon and ribavirin and had an SVR rate of 32%. The incidence of death or liver transplantation per 100 person-years was 1.00, 3.20, and 5.44 in SVR, non-SVR, and untreated patients, respectively. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, the risk of death or liver transplantation was significantly lower in SVR than in non-SVR patients and in non-SVR than in untreated patients (hazard ratios, 0.35 and 0.51, respectively; P = 0.019 and 0.038, respectively). The effect of treatment in non-SVR patients was higher in patients who had a virological or a biochemical response than in those who did not have a virological or a biochemical response. The risk of death or liver transplantation was significantly lower in treated than in untreated patients. Moreover, there was a gradient of mortality between patients with SVRs, virological or biochemical responders, and untreated patients, suggesting that treatment, even in the absence of viral eradication, has a beneficial effect on survival.     

Pegylated interferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin: an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment regimen for patients with hepatitis C virus related histologically proven cirrhosis

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the efficacy, safety and tolerability of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis Cvirus (HCV) infection and histologically proven fully established cirrhosis. We aimed here to evaluate the safety of this regimen in such patients and to identify baseline and on-treatment predictors of a sustained virological response (SVR). METHODS: Patients with histologically proven, HCV-induced cirrhosis were randomized to receive pegylated interferon-alpha2b (PEG-IFN-alpha2b; 1.0 microg/kg/week, n=56; group A) or recombinant interferon-alpha2b (IFN-alpha2b; 3 million IU three times/week, n=36; group B), each in combination with a weight-based dose of ribavirin (800-1,200 mg/day) for up to 48 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was the assessment of SVR, defined as undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after treatment cessation. RESULTS: Overall, 40% (37/93) of patients attained SVR: 44% (25/57) in group A and 33% (12/36) in group B (P=0.31). SVR rates were significantly higher in genotype 2/3 patients than in genotype 1 patients (69% versus 25%; P<0.0001). Platelet count at baseline, rapid virological response, and early virological response were predictors of SVR. Twelve patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event and 20 patients required ribavirin dose reduction for the management of anaemia. CONCLUSIONS: PEG-IFN-alpha2b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment regimen for patients with HCV-induced cirrhosis. Although SVR rates were more satisfactory in genotype 2/3 than in genotype 1 patients, our study identified additional predictors of response that could allow physicians to better manage treatment in this 'difficult-to-cure' subset of patients.     

Role of viral kinetics under HCV therapy in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients

Patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are less responsive to anti-HCV therapies and are at a higher risk of toxicity than HCV monoinfected patients. HCV viral kinetics is the basis for the study of response to interferon-based therapy and for predicting sustained virological response (SVR). A lack of early virological response (EVR; undetectable HCV RNA or a decrease of >/=2 log(10) from baseline) after 12 weeks of pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) is an equally reliable predictor of lack of SVR in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients and in the monoinfected HCV population. Early stopping rules are particularly important in coinfected HIV/HCV patients, considering their low chances of response in the more difficult-to-treat HCV genotypes 1 and 4 (<30%). Several factors have been involved in this low efficacy, including higher baseline HCV viraemia, slower viral kinetics decay under interferon pressure and a defective immune substratum. A better understanding of HCV viral kinetics under HCV therapy may be the basis for assaying different peg-IFN plus RBV schedules, such as induction or extending strategies, and may help physicians to make tailored decisions for the management of their patients.     

The magnitude of week 4 HCV RNA decay on pegylated interferon/ribavirin accurately predicts virological failure in patients with genotype 1

BACKGROUND: Current stopping rules during pegylated interferon (peg-IFN)/ribavirin (RBV) treatment rely on week 12 HCV RNA response, but earlier identification of non-responders offers clinical and economic advantages. AIMS AND METHODS: To evaluate, among 129 HCV-genotype-1-infected, treatment-naive patients receiving peg-IFN/RBV, the feasibility of predicting treatment failure using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves after measuring week 4 HCV RNA decreases, and to assess baseline predictors of not achieving sustained virological response (SVR). RESULTS: Peg-IFN-alpha2b was used in 84.5% of patients. Fifty-three (41%) reached SVR. The best cutoff value of HCV RNA decrease at week 4 to predict non-SVR corresponded to 1 log10 IU/ml: sensitivity and negative predictive value: 100%; specificity: 64%; positive predictive value: 66%; ROC curve area: 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86-0.96). By applying this threshold, treatment could have been discontinued at week 4 in 64% of virological non-responders (49/76). By univariate analysis, baseline HCV RNA > 800,000 IU/ml (P = 0.029), older age (P = 0.011), and higher aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels (P = 0.005) or AST/alanine aminotransferase ratio values (P = 0.04) were associated with failure. After multivariate analysis, only baseline HCV RNA >800,000 IU/ml (odds ratio [OR]: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.005-4.488; P = 0.048) and higher AST levels (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.003-1.024; P = 0.011) remained statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of > or = log10 IU/ml decrease in baseline HCV RNA at week 4 was 100% predictive of treatment failure, independently associated with HCV RNA > 800,000 IU/ml and higher AST levels.     

Therapy for treatment-refractory chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection: A retrospective analysis

Background:

The most effective current therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the combination of pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV).

Objective:

The aim of this retrospective analysis was to determine the rateof response to this therapy, and the factors affecting outcome, in patients with treatment-refractory chronic HCV genotype l b.

Methods:

The records of patients with chronic HCV infection and HCV geno-type1b who failed (nonresponse or relapse) previous treatment with standard interferon (IFN) + RSV were retrospectively analyzed for demographic data, virologic load, liver histology, biochemistry, treatment-related adverse effects (AEs), and the effects of dose reduction during treatment with peg-IFN + RBV for 48 weeks. Early virologic response (EVR) was defined as ≥2-log (copies/mL) decrease from baseline in serum HCV RNA concentration or the absence of detectable serum HCV RNA at treatment week 12. End-of-treatment response (ETR) was defined as the absence of detectable serum HCV RNA at treatment week 48. Sustained virologic response (SVR) was defined as the absence of detectable serum HCV RNA 24 weeks after treatment was discontinued. Factors affecting treatment outcome were determined using correlation analyses.

Results:

Data from the files of 17 patients (12 men, 5 women; mean [SD] age, 48 [2] years) were analyzed. EVR was achieved in 7 patients; however, viral breakthrough occurred in 2 of these patients during the treatment period, and 5 of these patients discontinued treatment because of severe treatment-related AEs (depression [1 patient] and neutropenia [4]). Seven patients achieved ETR, but HCV infection relapsed during the follow-up period. Three (18%) patients achieved SVR. Data concerning previous patterns of response to IFN + RBV therapy were available in 10 patients. Of these, 3 of 6 patients who had experienced relapse with the previous treatment achieved SVR with peg-IFN + RBV; neither of the 2 patients with nonresponse to the previous treatment achieved SVR. Major determinants of failure to reach SVR in these patients included previous nonresponder pattern, noncompliance with the therapy, and advanced-stage liver fibrosis. Tolerability was similar to that with the previous treatment.

Conclusions:

In this study in patients with chronic HCV genotype lb infectionand a history of relapse or nonresponse to standard IFN + RSV treatment, treatment with peg-IFN + RBV achieved an SVR rate of 18%. Further research is needed to determine the role of peg-IFN + RBV in the re-treatment of HCV infection.     

Viral interaction and responses in chronic hepatitis C and B coinfected patients with interferon-alpha plus ribavirin combination therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We conducted a case-control study to investigate the efficacy of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) and ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C and B virus (HCV/HBV) coinfection and to elucidate the interaction of these two viruses. METHODS: Forty-two chronic HCV/HBV-coinfected patients (29 IFN-naive, 13 IFN-relapsed) and 84 HCV-monoinfected controls, matched for age, sex and previous history of IFN-alpha therapy, were enrolled. All patients were treated with IFN-alpha-2b 6 MU three-times weekly plus ribavirin 1000-1200 mg daily for 24 weeks. Serum HCV RNA and HBV DNA were determined every 24 weeks for 72 weeks. RESULTS: The rate of HCV sustained virological response (SVR) was comparable among IFN-naive and IFN-relapsed HCV/HBV-coinfected patients and IFN-naive and IFN-relapsed HCV-monoinfected patients (69.0%, 69.2%, 67.2% and 57.7%, respectively; intention-to-treat analysis). HCV genotype 1b, high pretreatment HCV RNA levels and liver fibrosis were significantly associated with a lower HCV SVR. Of 16 baseline HBV viraemic patients, five (31.3%) achieved HBV SVR, which correlated negatively to HCV genotype non-1b and HCV SVR. Only one (6.3%) had simultaneous seroclearance of HCV and HBV. Antibodies to HBV surface antigen seroconversion developed in five (11.9%) patients during long-term follow-up. HCV responders had significantly higher rates of HBV DNA resurgence than HCV non-responders during and after treatment. Reciprocal viral interference was noted between HCV and HBV after IFN-alpha/ribavirin therapy. CONCLUSIONS: IFN-alpha/ribavirin combination therapy is effective for HCV/HBV-coinfected patients in eradicating HCV infection and might promote HBV seroclearance, and there is a mutual viral response and reciprocal viral interaction between HBV and HCV.     

A case of successful hepatitis C virus eradication by 24 weeks of telaprevir-based triple therapy for a hemophilia patient with hepatitis C virus/human immunodeficiency virus co-infection who previously failed pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin therapy

In Japan, the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection of some patients with hemophilia was caused by the transfusion of imported blood products, such as unheated coagulation factor. With the development of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV, chronic HCV infection has become a major cause of liver disease and mortality for hemophiliac patients coinfected with HCV/HIV. Data is limited regarding the efficacy and safety of antiviral therapy with the HCV protease inhibitor telaprevir (TVR) in combination with pegylated interferon-α (PegIFN-α) and ribavirin (RBV) for hemophilia patients coinfected with HCV/HIV. We report a case of a Japanese patient with hemophilia and HCV/HIV coinfection who had partial response to prior to PegIFN-α and RBV therapy. This is the first published report of 24-week TVR-based triple therapy for a hemophilia patient coinfected with HCV/HIV. The patient had HCV genotype 1a infection with a high viral load. His single-nucleotide polymorphism of the interleukin 28B (rs8099917) gene was the TT major allele. He presented with undetectable HIV RNA and a high CD4⁺ T cell counts by taking ART including tenofovir, emtricitabine and raltegravir. He was again treated for HCV with TVR plus PegIFN-α2b and RBV for the first 12 weeks, followed by the continuation of PegIFN-α2b and RBV for 12 additional weeks while continuing ART. He had rapid virological response and achieved sustained virological response with the 24-week treatment. No serious adverse events such as skin rash, severe anemia or exacerbated bleeding tendency were observed, only a mild headache. No dose adjustment was necessary when tenofovir and raltegravir were used in combined with TVR, and no HIV breakthrough was observed. TVR-based triple therapy with ART could can an effective treatment for hemophilia patients coinfected with HCV (genotype 1)/HIV regardless of prior response. TVR can be used in combination with tenofovir, emtricitabine and raltegravir for patients with hemophilia. Furthermore, patients with undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 could be successfully treated with a 24-week regimen.     

Early on-treatment viral load and baseline METAVIR score: improved prediction of sustained virological response in HCV genotype 1 patients

BACKGROUND: On-treatment HCV viral load during early therapy with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin is highly predictive of sustained virological response (SVR). We sought to provide further refinement of this prediction through an extensive evaluation of the effect of HCV viral loads at weeks 4, 8 and 12 on SVR, including analysis by liver disease stage grouping. METHODS: A total of 309 patients with genotype 1 chronic HCV and recent liver biopsy enrolled in the CHARIOT study received 180 μg of PEG-IFN-α2a weekly with 1,000/1,200 mg of ribavirin daily. The probability of an SVR was estimated using baseline METAVIR fibrosis stage and HCV viral loads at weeks 4, 8 and 12. RESULTS: HCV RNA was undetectable in 27.5%, 50.3% and 62.6% of patients at weeks 4, 8 and 12, respectively. SVR was 80.0%, 76.8% and 72.4% among patients with undetectable HCV RNA at weeks 4, 8 and 12, respectively. SVR decreased in a progressive fashion with increasing HCV viral loads at each early time point, but was similar for patients with HCV viral load <15 IU/ml, 15-100 IU/ml and 100-1,000 IU/ml. The effect of fibrosis stage on SVR was modest for patients with HCV viral load <1,000 IU/ml at week 4, but more marked for those with week 4 HCV viral load >1,000 IU/ml, and all HCV viral load categories at weeks 8 and 12. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of baseline fibrosis stage and on-treatment HCV viral load at early time points provides improved estimates for treatment response in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1.     

Dose-dependent and genotype-independent sustained virological response of a 12 week pegylated interferon alpha-2b treatment for acute hepatitis C

OBJECTIVES: The optimal regimen for acute hepatitis C (AHC) is considered to be a 24 week treatment with interferon (IFN) alpha-2b. A 24 week treatment with pegylated IFN (PEG-IFN) alpha-2b is also effective. This study was designed to assess response rates to a 12 week regimen of PEG-IFN alpha-2b. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with AHC were treated with PEG-IFN alpha-2b for 12 weeks in an open, non-randomized, prospective cohort study. Diagnosis of AHC was made with positive serum HCV RNA and elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels with a documented seroconversion or a known risk factor in the preceding 6 months. Treatment was administered within a median of 31 days (range 0-116) of the ALT level peak at a dosage varying from 1.06 to 1.66 microg/kg/week. The primary end-point was a sustained virological response (SVR). RESULTS: Nineteen patients were treated, of whom 11 patients (57.9%) had HCV genotype 1. Fourteen patients were asymptomatic. An SVR was achieved in 74% of patients and the SVR rate was 100 and 83.3%, respectively, in genotype 1 and non-1 infected patients treated with a dosage>or=1.33 microg/kg, compared with 40 and 50%, respectively, in those who received a lower dosage. An SVR was significantly associated by multivariate analysis only with PEG-IFN dosage>or=1.33 microg/kg/week. No significant association was found with any viral genotype. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of SVR was independent of the HCV genotype and was significantly associated by multivariate analysis only with the higher PEG-IFN dosage. Early identification and treatment of AHC is likely to decrease the burden of chronic hepatitis, especially when caused by HCV genotype 1.     

Prediction of treatment outcome in chronic hepatitis C patients based on early viral dynamics during high-dose induction interferon and ribavirin therapy

OBJECTIVE: In chronic hepatitis C, early viral load decline after interferon administration is dose dependent and reflects the intrinsic viral susceptibility to the antiviral action of interferon. We examined whether the augmented suppression of susceptible viral loads by high-dose induction interferon could possibly discriminate responsive patients from non-responsive patients at an early stage of treatment. METHODS: Fifty-nine chronic hepatitis C patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatment regimens; 3 MU interferon three times weekly plus ribavirin 1,000 mg/day for 24 weeks in the CR group (n = 30), and the same regimen as in the CR group except 10 MU interferon daily for the first week in the HR group (n = 29). Changes in viral loads during the first week of treatment were analyzed in terms of sustained virological response (SVR). RESULTS: The positive predictive values of undetectable (<100 IU/ml) or low serum HCV RNA (<2,000 IU/ml) after 1 week of treatment for SVR were 100% in both treatment groups, whereas the negative predictive values of the low viral titer were 91% in the HR group and 70% in the CR group. CONCLUSION: One-week virological response to high-dose induction interferon/ribavirin combination therapy is more predictive of SVR than conventional combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C.     

Second direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus infection after umbilical cord blood transplantation: A case report

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has an adverse impact on outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). It is recommended that HSCT candidates infected with HCV receive the treatment prior to transplantation. Although the recent approval of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has led to great advances in the treatment of HCV infection, little information is available on the efficacy and safety of DAA therapy in patients receiving allogeneic HSCT. Herein, we report the clinical course of an umbilical cord blood (UCB) recipient treated with DAAs for HCV infection. The patient achieved HCV RNA negativity with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir after consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and underwent transplantation before confirming sustained virological response (SVR) at 12 weeks. The HCV viral load became detectable on day +28 after transplantation and second HCV treatment with sofosbuvir, velpatasvir, and ribavirin was required. It is important to confirm SVR prior to transplantation, but it is often difficult. If early transplantation is required, close monitoring of HCV RNA after transplantation is needed. Further investigation is required to clarify the optimal management of HCV infection for allogeneic HSCT recipients in the DAA era.