Abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy for East Asian patients with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer: MONARCH 2 & 3 trials

This post hoc analysis of MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3 assesses the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in East Asian patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer. MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3 are global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 studies of abemaciclib/placebo + fulvestrant and abemaciclib/placebo + nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI, anastrozole or letrozole), respectively. The East Asian population comprised 212 (31.7%) of the 669 intent-to-treat (ITT) population in the MONARCH 2 trial and 144 (29.2%) of the 493 ITT patients in the MONARCH 3 trial. In the East Asian population, median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged in the abemaciclib arm compared with placebo in both MONARCH 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.520; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.362 to 0.747; P < .001; median: 21.2 vs 11.6 months) and MONARCH 3 (HR, 0.326; 95% CI, 0.200 to 0.531, P < .001; median: not reached vs 12.82 months). Diarrhea (MONARCH 2: 90%; MONARCH 3: 88%) and neutropenia (MONARCH 2: 68%; MONARCH 3: 58%) were the most frequent adverse events observed in the East Asian populations. Abemaciclib exposures and PK were similar in East Asians and the non-East Asian populations of both trials. Abemaciclib in combination with ET in the East Asian populations of MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3 provided consistent results with the ITT populations, demonstrating improvements in efficacy with generally tolerable safety profiles for patients with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer.     

nextMONARCH: Abemaciclib Monotherapy or Combined With Tamoxifen for Metastatic Breast Cancer

BackgroundAbemaciclib is a selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor administered continuously for hormone receptor-positive (HR⁺), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2^?) advanced breast cancer. Abemaciclib is associated with dose-dependent early-onset diarrhea. nextMONARCH evaluated abemaciclib monotherapy (with or without prophylactic loperamide) and combined with tamoxifen for endocrine refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after chemotherapy.Patients and MethodsnextMONARCH is an open-label, controlled, randomized, phase II study of women with endocrine-refractory HR⁺, HER2^? MBC previously treated with chemotherapy. Patients received abemaciclib 150 mg plus tamoxifen 20 mg (A+T), abemaciclib 150 mg every 12 hours (A-150), or abemaciclib 200 mg plus prophylactic loperamide (A-200). The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS). PFS analyses tested superiority of A+T to A-200 and informal noninferiority of A-150 to A-200. The secondary objectives included the objective response rate (ORR), safety, and pharmacokinetics.ResultsThe median PFS was 9.1 months for A+T versus 7.4 months for A-200 (hazard ratio, 0.815; 95% confidence interval, 0.556-1.193; P = .293). The A-200 PFS was comparable to that with A-150 at 6.5 months (hazard ratio, 1.045; 95% confidence interval, 0.711-1.535; P = .811). The ORR was 34.6%, 24.1%, and 32.5% for A+T, A-150, and A-200, respectively. No new safety signals were identified. The incidence and severity of diarrhea (62.3%; grade 3, 7.8%) with A-200 was similar to that with A-150 (67.1%; grade 3, 3.8%). The pharmacokinetics were comparable to previous observations.ConclusionsThe addition of tamoxifen to abemaciclib did not significantly improve PFS or ORR compared with abemaciclib monotherapy but confirmed the single-agent activity of abemaciclib in heavily pretreated HR⁺, HER2^? MBC. Dose reductions and antidiarrheal medication generally managed diarrhea while maintaining efficacy.     

Phase II Study of Panitumumab Monotherapy in Chemotherapy‐Naïve Frail or Elderly Patients with Unresectable RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: OGSG 1602

Lessons Learned

• Panitumumab monotherapy showed favorable efficacy and feasibility in the treatment of frail or elderly patients with RAS wild‐type unresectable colorectal cancer.
• It is especially effective for left‐sided tumors; therefore, panitumumab as first‐line treatment could be an additional therapeutic option for frail elderly patients, particularly in those who are unsuitable for upfront oxaliplatin‐based or irinotecan‐based combination regimens.

BackgroundFirst‐line panitumumab monotherapy is expected to be well tolerated and improve survival in patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, its safety and efficacy in chemotherapy‐naïve frail or elderly patients with unresectable RAS wild‐type (WT) colorectal cancer (CRC) have not been studied. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of panitumumab as first‐line treatment.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter phase II study on patients aged ≥76 years or ≥65 years considered unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy. Panitumumab 6 mg/kg of intravenous infusion was administered every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities.ResultsThirty‐six patients (median age: 81 [range, 67–88] years) were enrolled between February 2017 and August 2018. Two patients were excluded from the analysis of efficacy: one from lack of image examination at baseline and the other from lack of a measurable lesion. Thirty‐three (91.6%) patients had a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1, whereas two (5.6%) patients and one (2.8%) patient had a PS of 2 and 3, respectively. Twenty‐eight patients (77.8%) had left‐sided CRC, whereas eight (22.2%) had right‐sided CRC. The RR was 50.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.4–67.6), including three patients (8.8%) who had complete responses. A total of 26.5% had stable diseases, resulting in a DCR of 76.5% (90% CI, 61.5–87.7). The RR of patients with left‐ and right‐sided tumors was 65.4% (95% CI, 44.3–82.8) and 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0–36.9), respectively. Major grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicities were rash (n = 6, 16.7%), hypomagnesemia (n = 4, 11.1%), fatigue (n = 3, 8.3%), paronychia (n = 2, 5.6%), and hyponatremia (n = 2, 5.6%). The only grade 3 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (n = 1, 2.8%).ConclusionPanitumumab monotherapy showed favorable efficacy and feasibility in frail or elderly patients with RAS WT unresectable CRC. Survival analysis including OS, PFS, and TTF is currently in progress.     

Real‐world outcomes of pembrolizumab monotherapy in non‐small cell lung cancer in Japan: A post‐marketing surveillance

This post‐marketing surveillance (PMS) was initiated in Japan to identify factors affecting the safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed cell death ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) expression. This PMS was conducted from December 2016 to June 2019 at 717 centers across Japan. Patients with unresectable advanced/recurrent NSCLC who received pembrolizumab monotherapy as first‐line (1L) treatment for PD‐L1‐expressing tumors (Tumor Proportion Score [TPS] ≥ 50%) or second‐line or later (2L+) treatment for tumors with PD‐L1 TPS ≥ 1% were enrolled and followed up for 1 year. Of 2805 registered patients, 2740 and 2400 comprised the safety and effectiveness analysis sets, respectively. The median age (range) was 69 (27–92) years; 55.7% and 29.2% of patients experienced treatment‐related adverse events and adverse events of special interest (AEOSIs), respectively. More common AEOSIs included interstitial lung disease, endocrine disorders, liver dysfunction, colitis/severe diarrhea, infusion reactions, and severe skin disorders. The frequency of experiencing ≥2 AEOSIs was low (1L, 6.5%; 2L+, 2.8%). Most AEOSIs occurred within 150 days after initiation of pembrolizumab monotherapy. At 1‐year follow‐up, the objective response rate was 39.2% (1L, 51.5%; 2L+, 30.0%). In conclusion, the 1‐year safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with unresectable advanced/recurrent NSCLC as 1L treatment for tumors with PD‐L1 TPS ≥ 50% and 2L+ treatment for tumors with PD‐L1 TPS ≥ 1% were similar to those reported in phase 2/3 trials.     

Cyclin‐dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors suppress tumor growth in extramammary Paget’s disease

Extramammary Paget’s disease (EMPD) is a rare adnexal neoplasm commonly seen in the genital areas among the senior population. The prognosis of advanced EMPD is not favorable; thus, the development of potential treatments has long been sought. Cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors such as abemaciclib and palbociclib have been proven effective against metastatic breast cancer; however, no studies have addressed CDK4/6 inhibitors as an EMPD treatment. We herein examine the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors against an EMPD patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) model. Abemaciclib (50 mg/kg/day) or palbociclib (120 mg/kg/day) was given orally to tumor‐bearing NOD/Scid mice over a 3‐week period. We also investigated the protein expression levels of CDK4/6 and cyclin D1 through immunohistochemical staining using EMPD clinical samples. Treatment with abemaciclib or palbociclib as a single agent was found to significantly suppress tumor growth in EMPD‐PDX. The Ki‐67‐positive ratio of the treated EMPD‐PDX tumors was significantly lower than that of the nontreated tumors. Clinically, the expression levels of CDK4 and cyclin D1 were significantly higher in the EMPD tumor cells than in the normal epidermis. Our results suggest that CDK4/6 inhibitors could be novel and potent therapeutics for the treatment of EMPD.     

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with persistent,recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: Results from KEYNOTE‐826

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab demonstrated prolonged progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer in the phase 3, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled KEYNOTE‐826 study. We report outcomes in patients enrolled in Japan. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo Q3W for up to 35 cycles plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel 175 mg/m² + cisplatin 50 mg/m² or carboplatin AUC 5) with or without bevacizumab 15 mg/kg. Dual primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment and OS in the global population; these were evaluated in patients with tumors with PD‐L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1, all‐comers, and PD‐L1 CPS ≥10. Fifty‐seven patients from Japan were randomized (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, n = 35; placebo plus chemotherapy, n = 22). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved PFS versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with PD‐L1 CPS ≥1 (n = 51; hazard ratio [HR; 95% CI], 0.36 [0.16–0.77]), all‐comers (n = 57; 0.45 [0.22–0.90]), and patients with PD‐L1 CPS ≥10 (n = 25; 0.36 [0.12–1.07]). HRs (95% CI) for OS were 0.38 (0.14–1.01), 0.41 (0.17–1.00), and 0.37 (0.10–1.30), respectively. Incidence of grade 3–5 AEs was 94% in the pembrolizumab group and 100% in the placebo group. Consistent with findings in the global KEYNOTE‐826 study, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab may prolong survival versus placebo plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab and had a manageable safety profile in Japanese patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.     

Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant in East Asian women with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer: Overall survival from MONARCH 2

MONARCH 2 is a global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of abemaciclib/placebo + fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. The East Asian population comprised 212 (31.7%) of the 669 intent-to-treat population in the MONARCH 2 trial. Consistent with the primary analysis, this subpopulation analysis of East Asian patients indicated progression-free survival benefit in the abemaciclib arm. The median overall survival was not reached in the abemaciclib arm and was 48.9 months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio 0.80; 95% confidence interval 0.52–1.24; p = 0.377). In addition, other efficacy endpoints, including time to chemotherapy, chemotherapy free survival, and time to second disease progression, indicated benefit in the abemaciclib arm. This analysis found no new safety concerns with longer follow-up. These findings support the positive benefit–risk balance of the MONARCH 2 regimen in East Asian patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer.     

D‐Dimer Enhances Risk‐Targeted Thromboprophylaxis in Ambulatory Patients with Cancer

BackgroundThromboprophylaxis for ambulatory patients with cancer is effective, although uncertainties remain on who should be targeted. Using D‐dimer values from individuals enrolled to the AVERT trial, we sought to identify and validate a more efficient venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk threshold for thromboprophylaxis.Materials and MethodsThe AVERT trial compared thromboprophylaxis with apixaban with placebo among patients with cancer with a Khorana Risk Score ≥2. The D‐dimer measured at randomization was used to calculate an individualized 6‐month VTE risk using the validated CATScore. A modified intention‐to‐treat analysis was used to assess efficacy (VTE) and safety (major and overall bleeding) in the (a) complete cohort and (b) ≥8% and < 8% 6‐month VTE risk thresholds.ResultsFive hundred seventy‐four patients were randomized in the AVERT trial; 466 (81%) with baseline D‐dimer were included in the study. Two hundred thirty‐seven subjects received apixaban; 229 received placebo. In the complete cohort, there were 13 (5.5%) VTE events in the apixaban arm compared with 26 (11.4%) events in the placebo arm (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.49 [0.25–0.95], p < .05). Number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one VTE = 17. Eighty‐two (35%) and 72 (31%) patients in the apixaban and placebo arms, respectively, had a 6‐month VTE risk ≥8%. In this subgroup, 7 (8.4%) VTE events occurred with apixaban and 19 (26.3%) events with placebo (aHR 0.33 [0.14‐0.81], p < .05), NNT = 6. Individuals with a VTE risk <8% derived no benefit from apixaban thromboprophylaxis (aHR 0.89 [0.30–2.65), p = .84). Increased rates of overall bleeding were observed with apixaban in both the complete (aHR 2.11 [1.09–4.09], p < .05) and ≥ 8% predicted risk cohorts (aHR 2.87 [0.91–9.13], p = .07).ConclusionA 6‐month VTE risk threshold of ≥8% increases the efficiency of risk‐targeted thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer.Implications for PracticeAmbulatory patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). A Khorana Risk Score (KRS) ≥2 is currently the suggested threshold for thromboprophylaxis. Using baseline D‐dimer values from individuals enrolled to the AVERT trial, this retrospective validation study identifies a 6‐month VTE risk of ≥8% as a more efficient threshold for thromboprophylaxis. At this threshold, the number needed to treat to prevent one VTE is 6, compared with 17 when using a KRS ≥2. Conversely, individuals with a predicted risk of <8% derive no clinical benefit from thromboprophylaxis. Future prospective studies should validate this threshold for outpatient thromboprophylaxis.     

Optimal Avapritinib Treatment Strategies for Patients with Metastatic or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

BackgroundAvapritinib, a novel inhibitor of KIT/PDGFRA, is approved in the U.S. for the treatment of adults with PDGFRA exon 18‐mutant unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (U/M GISTs). We assessed the safety of avapritinib and provide evidence‐based guidance on management of avapritinib‐associated adverse events (AEs), including cognitive effects and intracranial bleeding.Materials and MethodsWe performed a post hoc analysis of data from a two‐part, single‐arm dose escalation/expansion phase I study (NAVIGATOR; {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02508532","term_id":"NCT02508532"}}NCT02508532) in patients with U/M GISTs treated with oral avapritinib 30–600 mg once daily. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability; the impact of dose modification (interruption and/or reduction) on progression‐free survival (PFS) was a secondary endpoint. Efficacy analyses were limited to patients who started avapritinib at 300 mg (approved dose).ResultsOf 250 patients enrolled in the study, 74.0% presented with KIT mutation and 24.8% presented with PDGFRA exon 18‐mutation; 66.8% started avapritinib at 300 mg. The most common treatment‐related AEs (any grade) were nausea (59.2%), fatigue (50.0%), periorbital edema (42.0%), anemia (39.2%), diarrhea (36.0%), vomiting (36.0%), and increased lacrimation (30.8%). No treatment‐related deaths occurred. Among 167 patients starting on 300 mg avapritinib, all‐cause cognitive effects rate (grade 1–2) was 37.0% in all patients and 52.0% in patients ≥65 years. Cognitive effects improved to a lower grade more quickly with dose modification (1.3–3.1 weeks) than without (4.9–7.6 weeks). Median PFS was 11.4 months with dose modification and 7.2 months without.ConclusionTolerability‐guided dose modification of avapritinib is an effective strategy for managing AEs in patients with GISTs.Implications for PracticeEarly recognition of adverse events and tailored dose modification appear to be effective approaches for managing treatment‐related adverse events and maintaining patients on avapritinib. Dose reduction does not appear to result in reduced efficacy. Patients'' cognitive function should be assessed at baseline and monitored carefully throughout treatment with avapritinib for the onset of cognitive adverse events. Dose interruption is recommended at the first sign of any cognitive effect, including grade 1 events.     

Immune‐related adverse events in urothelial cancer patients: Adjustment for immortal time bias

To investigate the association between the onset, severity, and type of immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) and the efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with platinum‐pretreated advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC), we retrospectively collected clinical datasets of 755 patients and conducted landmark analysis. Patients who survived for fewer than 3 months were excluded from the evaluation to reduce the immortal time bias. In total, 620 patients were evaluated, of whom 220 patients (35.5%) experienced grade ≥2 irAEs, including 134 patients with grade 2 irAEs and 86 with grade ≥3 irAEs. Propensity score matching extracted 198 patients with and without grade ≥2 irAEs. The onset of grade ≥2 irAEs was associated with longer median progression‐free survival (PFS) (8.3 months vs. 4.5 months, p = 0.003) and overall survival (OS) (20.4 months vs. 14.3 months, p = 0.031) and a higher objective response rate (ORR) (44.8% vs. 30.2%, p = 0.004). Patients with grade 2 irAEs had significantly better oncological outcomes (PFS, OS, and ORR) than grade ≤1 and ≥3 irAEs. Patients with grade ≥3 irAEs had worse outcomes than grade 2 irAEs. Endocrine and skin irAEs were related with better survival outcomes, and the rate of severities was lower in these categories. In conclusion, the occurrence of irAEs, particularly low‐grade irAEs, was predictive of pembrolizumab efficacy in patients with platinum‐pretreated advanced UC.     

Dual targeted therapy with pyrotinib and trastuzumab for HER2‐positive advanced colorectal cancer: A phase 2 trial

This trial was initiated to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in combination with trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). In this single‐arm, open‐label, multicenter, phase 2 trial patients with HER2‐positive recurrent/metastatic CRC were enrolled and received oral pyrotinib 400 mg once a day plus intravenous trastuzumab 8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Disease control rate (DCR), progression‐free survival (PFS), duration of response, and safety were assessed as secondary endpoints. From December 2019 to October 2021, a total of 20 patients were enrolled and 18 of them were evaluable for response. All patients were B‐rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (BRAF) wild type. Four patients achieved partial response, with an ORR of 22.2% (4/18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4–47.6) and DCR of 61.1% (11/18, 95% CI 35.8–82.7), while the ORR and DCR were 33.3% (4/12, 95% CI 13.8–60.9) and 83.3% (10/12, 95% CI 51.6–97.9), respectively, in RAS wild‐type patients. At the time of cut‐off day, median follow‐up was 10.7 months (range 3.8–13.8). The median PFS was 3.4 months (95% CI 1.8–4.3) in the overall population and 4.3 months (95% CI 3.2–8.5) in the RAS wild‐type group. The most common adverse event of grade ≥3 was diarrhea (13/20, 65.0%). Pyrotinib combined with trastuzumab showed promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with RAS/BRAF wild‐type HER2‐positive advanced CRC.     

Efficacy and safety of standard of care with/without bevacizumab for platinum‐resistant ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal cancer previously treated with bevacizumab: The Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study JGOG3023

We investigated the efficacy and safety of further bevacizumab therapy in patients with platinum‐resistant ovarian cancer whose disease had progressed after bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. In this multicenter, open‐label, phase II trial (JGOG3023), patients were randomized 1:1 to a single‐agent chemotherapy alone (either pegylated liposomal doxorubicin [40 or 50 mg/m² administered intravenously], topotecan [1.25 mg/m² intravenously], paclitaxel [80 mg/m² intravenously], or gemcitabine [1000 mg/m² intravenously]) or single‐agent chemotherapy + bevacizumab (15 mg/m² intravenously). The primary endpoint was investigator‐assessed progression‐free survival (PFS) according to RECIST version 1.1. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and response rate according to Gynecological Cancer Intergroup cancer antigen 125 criteria. In total, 103 patients were allocated to chemotherapy (n = 51) or chemotherapy + bevacizumab (n = 52). Median investigator‐assessed PFS was 3.1 and 4.0 mo in each group, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32‐0.90, P = .0082). Median OS was 11.3 and 15.3 mo in each group, respectively (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.38‐1.17, P = .1556). Respective ORRs were 13.7% and 25.0% (P = .0599) and response rates were 16.7% and 21.4% (P = .8273). The incidence of grade ≥3 treatment‐related AEs was 42.0% in the chemotherapy group and 54.9% in the chemotherapy + bevacizumab group; AEs were well tolerated, with only 2 and 12 events leading to discontinuation of therapy, respectively. Bevacizumab was effective beyond progressive disease and AEs were manageable. The observed improvement in PFS requires further verification.     

Ramucirumab or placebo plus erlotinib in EGFR‐mutated,metastatic non‐small‐cell lung cancer: East Asian subset of RELAY

In the global phase III RELAY study, ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) demonstrated superior progression‐free survival (PFS) to placebo plus erlotinib (PL + ERL) in untreated patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation‐positive metastatic non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI]: 0.59 [0.46‐0.76]). This prespecified analysis assessed RAM + ERL efficacy and safety in the RELAY subset enrolled in East Asia (Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong). Randomized (1:1) patients received oral ERL (150 mg/d) plus intravenous RAM (10 mg/kg) or PL Q2W. Primary endpoint was PFS (investigator‐assessed). Key secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Exploratory endpoints included biomarker analyses and time to second progression (PFS2). Median PFS was 19.4 vs 12.5 mo for RAM + ERL (n = 166) vs PL + ERL (n = 170) (HR: 0.636 [0.485‐0.833]; P = .0009). The 1‐y PFS rate was 72.4% vs 52.2%, respectively. PFS benefit was consistent in most subgroups, including by EGFR mutation (Ex19del, Ex21.L858R). ORR and DCR were similar in both arms, but median DoR was longer with RAM + ERL. OS and PFS2 were immature at data cut‐off (censoring rates, 81.2%‐84.3% and 64.1%‐70.5%, respectively). Grade ≥ 3 treatment‐emergent adverse events were more frequent with RAM + ERL (70.7%) than PL + ERL (49.4%). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were similar in both arms (RAM + ERL, 13.3%; PL + ERL, 12.9%), as were post‐progression EGFR T790M mutation rates (43%; 50%). With superior PFS over PL + ERL and safety consistent with the overall RELAY population, RAM + ERL is a viable treatment option for EGFR‐mutated metastatic NSCLC in East Asia.     

Comparison of treatment-related adverse events of different Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer: A network meta-analysis

BackgroundPalbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib have all been approved in combination with endocrine therapy in hormone-receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer. While the efficacy of these drugs appears similar, differences in safety and tolerability are apparent.MethodsWe searched PubMed and ASCO, ESMO and SABCS proceedings to identify randomized trials of palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib. Data on common and serious adverse events (AE) were extracted for each approved drug. The odds ratio for each AE and the hazard ratio for progression-free survival were calculated relative to endocrine therapy alone. A network meta-analysis was then performed for each endocrine therapy backbone (aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant) to compare ribociclib and abemaciclib to palbociclib.Results8 trials were included in the analysis and comprised 2799 patients receiving cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors palbociclib: 873 patients; ribociclib: 1153 patients; abemaciclib: 773 patients. In 5 trials (1524 patients), the endocrine therapy backbone was an AI and in 3 trials (1275 patients) it was fulvestrant. Compared to palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib showed significantly lower grade 3–4 neutropenia, but significantly higher GI toxicity. Treatment discontinuation was higher with abemaciclib than other drugs. Efficacy of the 3 drugs was similar. Compared to palbociclib, for AI backbone, the HR for PFS for ribociclib was 0.98 and for abemaciclib 1.02. For fulvestrant backbone, the HR were 0.88 and 0.93 respectively.ConclusionsPalbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib have comparable efficacy, but differences in safety and tolerability. Abemaciclib has worse tolerability with significantly higher treatment discontinuation likely due to GI toxicity.     

68Ga‐DOTATATE Positron Emission Tomography‐Computed Tomography Quantification Predicts Response to Somatostatin Analog Therapy in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BackgroundSomatostatin analogs (SSAs) are the frontline antitumor therapy in advanced well‐differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP‐NETs). A subset of patients demonstrate early disease progression on SSA therapy, yet the currently known predictors for treatment failure lack specificity to affect therapeutic decision. SSAs target tumor somatostatin receptors, the level of which can be quantitatively assessed with ⁶⁸Ga‐DOTATATE positron emission tomography‐computed tomography (PET/CT). We investigated the ability of ⁶⁸Ga‐DOTATATE PET/CT to predict response to SSA therapy.Materials and MethodsThe records of 108 consecutive patients with well‐differentiated grade 1–2 GEP‐NETs on SSA monotherapy who received ⁶⁸Ga‐DOTATATE PET/CT scans were retrospectively reviewed to obtain baseline characteristics, ⁶⁸Ga‐DOTATATE maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and progression‐free survival (PFS) data. The optimal SUVmax cutoff for patient stratification was obtained with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. PFS in the high versus low SUVmax groups was compared with Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis. The effects of baseline characteristics and SUVmax on PFS were examined with univariate and multivariate Cox regression.Results ⁶⁸Ga‐DOTATATE SUVmax predicted therapeutic failure with sensitivity and specificity of 39% and 98%, respectively. SUVmax of <18.35 was associated with shorter PFS, which was reproduced in the subgroup analysis of SSA‐naïve patients. Low SUVmax was the only predictor of early treatment failure (hazard ratio, 6.85) in multivariate analysis, as well as in the subgroup analysis of grade 2 GEP‐NETs.ConclusionLow SUVmax on ⁶⁸Ga‐DOTATATE PET/CT independently predicts early failure on SSA monotherapy in patients with well‐differentiated grade 1–2 GEP‐NET. Patients with lack of expected benefit from SSA therapy can be readily identified using routine ⁶⁸Ga‐DOTATATE PET/CT with very high specificity.Implications for PracticeBased on ⁶⁸Ga‐DOTATATE positron emission tomography‐computed tomography imaging, clinicians can better inform patients on the expected benefit of somatostatin analog therapy for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, especially when access to the therapy is difficult, and offer proactive discussion on alternative management options.     

Neoadjuvant Pyrotinib plus Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy for Stage I–III HER2‐Positive Breast Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial

Lessons Learned

• This is the first trial to explore the neoadjuvant therapy of pyrotinib in HER2‐positive operable and locally advanced breast cancer, in combination with epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel plus trastuzumab.
• Results primarily showed that pyrotinib in combination with epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel plus trastuzumab was effective and safe in HER2‐positive operable and locally advanced breast cancer.
• A subsequent randomized controlled trial is still warranted to confirm these results.

BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy of pyrotinib, a new irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), was first estimated in patients with HER2‐positive breast cancer in this phase II study, in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy.MethodsBetween February 19, 2019, and November 20, 2019, 20 female Chinese patients with stage I–III HER2‐positive breast cancer were assigned to receive eight cycles of neoadjuvant pyrotinib (P) in combination with four cycles of epirubicin (E) and cyclophosphamide (C) followed by four cycles of docetaxel (T) and trastuzumab (H), once every 3 weeks, referred to as P + EC‐TH.ResultsA total of 19 patients completed the therapy and final surgery. The total pathological complete response (tpCR) rate was 73.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48.8–90.9), and no recurrence or metastasis occurred during the short‐term follow‐up period. The objective response rate (ORR) was 100% (95% CI, 82.4–100). The most common adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea and leukopenia in 18 of 20 patients (90%), but no grade 5 AEs were reported.ConclusionThis study showed that in HER2‐positive operable or locally advanced breast cancer, the tpCR rate of P + EC‐TH neoadjuvant therapy was about twice as high as that of EC‐TH neoadjuvant therapy reported in other trials, with tolerable side effects.     

Phase I,multicenter, dose‐escalation study of avadomide in adult Japanese patients with advanced malignancies

Non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) treated with chemoimmunotherapy has limited efficacy in some patients, resulting in relapsed or refractory disease. Avadomide (CC‐122) is a novel cereblon‐binding agent that exhibits antilymphoma and immune‐modulation activities with a biological profile distinct from similar agents, such as lenalidomide. This phase I multicenter study evaluated avadomide in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors or NHL. Fourteen patients with NHL and one with a solid tumor (esophageal carcinoma), were enrolled in four dose‐escalation cohorts using a 3 + 3 design. Primary endpoints included safety, dose‐limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum‐tolerated dose and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and pharmacokinetics. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response. One patient with NHL experienced DLT, which included face edema, pharyngeal edema, and tumor flare (all grade 1) that led to a dose reduction. Eleven patients had grade ≥3 treatment‐emergent adverse events, most frequently decreased neutrophil count (33%) and decreased lymphocyte count (20%). The ORR in patients with NHL (n = 13) was 54%, including four complete and three partial responses. The best response for the solid tumor patient was progressive disease. Avadomide dose intensity was consistent across cohorts, and the 3‐mg dose given five consecutive days/week was established as the RP2D. This phase I study identified a tolerable dose of avadomide, with an acceptable toxicity profile and clinically meaningful efficacy in Japanese patients with previously treated NHL.     

Oral histone deacetylase inhibitor tucidinostat (HBI‐8000) in patients with relapsed or refractory adult T‐cell leukemia/lymphoma: Phase IIb results

This multicenter, prospective phase IIb trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of tucidinostat (HBI‐8000) in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) adult T‐cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) was undertaken in Japan. Eligible patients had R/R ATLL and had failed standard of care treatment with chemotherapy and with mogamulizumab. Twenty‐three patients received tucidinostat 40 mg orally twice per week and were included in efficacy and safety analyses. The primary end‐point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent committee. The ORR was 30.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.2, 52.9]. Median progression‐free survival was 1.7 months (95% CI, 0.8, 7.4), median duration of response was 9.2 months (95% CI, 2.6, not reached), and median overall survival was 7.9 months (95% CI, 2.3, 18.0). All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), which were predominantly hematologic and gastrointestinal. Incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was 78.3%; most were laboratory abnormalities (decreases in platelets, neutrophils, white blood cells, and hemoglobin). Tucidinostat was well tolerated with AEs that could be mostly managed with supportive care and dose modifications. Tucidinostat is a meaningful treatment option for R/R ATLL patients; further investigation is warranted.     

Adjuvant atezolizumab in Japanese patients with resected stage IB‐IIIA non‐small cell lung cancer (IMpower010)

The global phase 3 IMpower010 study evaluated adjuvant atezolizumab versus best supportive care (BSC) following platinum‐based chemotherapy in patients with resected stage IB–IIIA non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report a subgroup analysis in patients enrolled in Japan. Eligible patients had complete resection of histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IB (tumors ≥4 cm)–IIIA NSCLC. Upon completing 1–4 cycles of adjuvant cisplatin‐based chemotherapy, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive atezolizumab (fixed dose of 1200 mg every 21 days; 16 cycles or 1 year) or BSC. The primary endpoint of the global IMpower010 study was investigator‐assessed disease‐free survival, tested hierarchically first in patients with stage II–IIIA NSCLC whose tumors expressed programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) on ≥1% of tumor cells, then in all randomized patients with stage II–IIIA NSCLC, and finally in the intention‐to‐treat (ITT) population (stage IB–IIIA NSCLC). Safety was evaluated in all patients who received atezolizumab or BSC. The study comprised 149 enrolled patients in three populations: ITT (n = 117; atezolizumab, n = 59; BSC, n = 58), all‐randomized stage II–IIIA (n = 113; atezolizumab, n = 56; BSC, n = 57), and PD‐L1 tumor cells ≥1% stage II–IIIA (n = 74; atezolizumab, n = 41; BSC, n = 33). At the data cutoff date (January 21, 2021), a trend toward disease‐free survival improvement with atezolizumab vs BSC was observed in the PD‐L1 tumor cells ≥1% stage II–IIIA (unstratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25–1.08), all‐randomized stage II–IIIA (unstratified HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.35–1.11), and ITT (unstratified HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.34–1.10) populations. Atezolizumab‐related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 16% of patients; no treatment‐related grade 5 events occurred. Adjuvant atezolizumab showed disease‐free survival improvement and a tolerable toxicity profile in Japanese patients in IMpower010, consistent with the global study results.     

Identification of Very Low‐Risk Subgroups of Patients with Primary Mediastinal Large B‐Cell Lymphoma Treated with R‐CHOP

BackgroundR‐CHOP can cure approximately 75% of patients with primary mediastinal large B‐cell lymphoma (PMLBCL), but prognostic factors have not been sufficiently evaluated yet. R‐da‐ EPOCH is potentially more effective but also more toxic than R‐CHOP. Reliable prognostic classification is needed to guide treatment decisions.Materials and MethodsWe analyzed the impact of clinical prognostic factors on the outcome of 332 PMLBCL patients ≤65 years treated with R‐CHOP ± radiotherapy in a multicenter setting in Greece and Cyprus.ResultsWith a median follow‐up of 69 months, 5‐year freedom from progression (FFP) was 78% and 5‐year lymphoma specific survival (LSS) was 89%. On multivariate analysis, extranodal involvement (E/IV) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥2 times upper limit of normal (model A) were significantly associated with FFP; E/IV and bulky disease (model B) were associated with LSS. Both models performed better than the International Prognostic Index (IPI) and the age‐adjusted IPI by Harrel''s C rank parameter and Akaike information criterion. Both models A and B defined high‐risk subgroups (13%–27% of patients [pts]) with approximately 19%–23% lymphoma‐related mortality. They also defined subgroups composing approximately one‐fourth or one‐half of the patients, with 11% risk of failure and only 1% or 4% 5‐year lymphoma‐related mortality.ConclusionThe combination of E/IV with either bulky disease or LDH ≥2 times upper limit of normal defined high‐risk but not very‐high‐risk subgroups. More importantly, their absence defined subgroups comprising approximately one‐fourth or one‐half of the pts, with 11% risk of failure and minimal lymphoma‐related mortality, who may not need more intensive treatment such as R‐da‐EPOCH.Implications for PracticeBy analyzing the impact of baseline clinical characteristics on outcomes of a large cohort of patients with primary mediastinal large B‐cell lymphoma homogeneously treated with R‐CHOP with or without radiotherapy, we developed novel prognostic indices which can aid in deciding which patients can be adequately treated with R‐CHOP and do not need more intensive regimens such as R‐da‐EPOCH. The new indices consist of objectively determined characteristics (extranodal disease or stage IV, bulky disease, and markedly elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase), which are readily available from standard initial staging procedures and offer better discrimination compared with established risk scores (International Prognostic Index [IPI] and age‐adjusted IPI).