Younger Patients and Men Achieve Higher Outcome Scores Than Older Patients and Women After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background

There is some evidence that functional performance and validated outcome scores differ according to the gender, age, and sport participation status of a patient after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, the impact of these three factors, and interaction among them, has not been studied across a large relatively homogeneous group of patients to better elucidate their impact.

Questions/purposes

We reviewed a large cohort of patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction to determine if ROM, knee laxity, objective performance measures, and validated outcome scores differed according to (1) gender; (2) age; and (3) sport participation status.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Between 2007 and 2016, we performed 3452 single-bundle ACL reconstructions in patients who participated in sport before ACL injury. Of those, complete followup (including preoperative scores and scores at 1 year after surgery; mean, 14 months; range, 12–20 months) was available on 2672 (77%) of patients. Those lost to followup and those accounted for were not different in terms of age, gender, and sports participation at baseline. The study group consisted of 1726 (65%) men and 946 (35%) women with a mean ± SD age of 28 ± 10 years. For these patients, the following measures were obtained: knee ROM (flexion and extension deficit), instrumented knee laxity, single and triple hop for distance limb symmetry index (LSI), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective evaluation, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score. Mean scores and measures of variability were calculated for each outcome measure. Comparisons were made among gender, age, and sport status.

Results

Men had less knee laxity after reconstruction (men 1.1 ± 2.2 mm, women 1.3 ± 2.4 mm; mean difference 0.2 mm [0.1–0.4], p < 0.001), greater limb symmetry (single limb hop men: 94% ± 12%, women 91% ± 13%, mean difference 3% [2%–4%], p < 0.001), and higher IKDC scores than did women (men 84 ± 12, women 82 ± 12, mean difference 2 [1–3], p < 0.001). With the exception of instrumented laxity, all outcome measures showed reduced deficits and higher scores in younger patients. This was most marked for LSI scores between the youngest and oldest aged patient groups (crossover hop: < 16 years 99% ± 10%, > 45 years 90% ± 16%, mean difference: 9 [5–11], p < 0.001). Patients who had returned to their preinjury sport also scored higher and had smaller deficits for all outcomes except ROM compared with patients who had not returned to sport at the time of followup (IKDC subjective: returned 90 ± 9, no sport 79 ± 12, mean difference 11 points [9–12], p < 0.001; single limb hop: returned 97 ± 10, no sport 91 ± 14, mean difference 6% [5%–7%], p < 0.001).

Conclusions

This study showed that some of the most commonly used functional performance and validated clinical scores for ACL reconstruction are superior for patients who are younger, male, and have returned to preinjury sport. Reference to these data allows clinicians to more effectively evaluate a patient based on their age, gender, and sport status when making return to sport and rehabilitation decisions.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study.

     

Anterior cruciate ligament injury in professional dancers

Background?Anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL) is a common sport injury; however, there are no data concerning dance and ACL injury. We report the incidence, injury mechanism, and clinical follow‐up of ACL injury in professional dancers.

Patients and methods?In a retrospective cohort study involving the three major dance companies in the Netherlands, by interviewing all 253 dancers who had had a full‐time contract during 1991–2002, dancers with symptomatic ACL injury or past ACL reconstruction were identified and examined.

Results?6 dancers (2 of whom were women) had had a symptomatic ACL rupture and reconstruction. Interestingly, all had been on the left side and had had a similar trauma mechanism: while dancing a classical variation they landed, after a jump, on their left leg, in the turned out position with a valgus force on their knee. There was a higher risk of ACL injury in the classical company than in the two contemporary companies. The risk of dancers having a rupture of the left ACL during a 10‐year career in this classical company was 7%.

Interpretation?ACL injuries are not an infrequently seen type of injury in professional classical dancers, with a very specific mechanism of injury—a landing on the left leg in exorotation. More attention and prophylactic measures should be given to this specific injury mechanism.     

Patient-Related Risk Factors for Contralateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Tear After ACL Reconstruction: An Analysis of 3707 Primary ACL Reconstructions

Background

Return to play after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can increase risk for both ipsilateral graft rupture and contralateral ACL rupture. The risk for injury of the contralateral knee after ACL reconstruction could be nearly double that of ipsilateral graft rupture.

Questions/Purposes

We sought to identify independent, patient-related risk factors for contralateral ACL rupture following primary ACL reconstruction.

Methods

A national database was queried for patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction from 2007 to 2015 with a minimum of 2 years of post-operative follow-up (n = 12,044). Patients who underwent subsequent primary ACL reconstruction on the contralateral extremity were then identified. A multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis was utilized to evaluate patient-related risk factors for contralateral ACL rupture, including demographic and comorbidity variables. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each risk factor.

Results

Of the 3707 patients who had a minimum of 2 years of database activity and comprised the study group, 204 (5.5%) experienced a contralateral ACL rupture requiring reconstruction. Independent risk factors for contralateral ACL rupture included age less than 20 years, female gender, tobacco use, and depression. Obesity, morbid obesity, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, and a history of anxiety were not significant predictors of contralateral injury.

Conclusion

We were able to adequately power an analysis to identify several significant patient-related risk factors for contralateral ACL rupture after primary ACL reconstruction, including younger age, female gender, tobacco use, and depression. This information can be used to counsel patients on the risk of injury to the contralateral knee.

     

Meeting movement quantity or quality return to sport criteria is associated with reduced second ACL injury rate

The purposes of this prospective cohort study were (1) to assess if second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury rate 2 years after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in those who returned to pivoting sport was associated with meeting (a) quantitative return to sport (RTS) criteria, (b) qualitative RTS criteria, and (c) combined quantitative and qualitative RTS criteria, and (2) to determine why athletes did not return to their preinjury (level of) sport. Athletes after ACLR performed RTS tests immediately before RTS: seven movement quantity (strength and hop test battery) and two movement quality (countermovement jump with LESS score and hop-and-hold test) tests. A 2-year postoperative questionnaire asked for RTS, reasons for not returning to the same (level of) sport and second ACL injuries. One hundred and forty-four athletes (82%) completed the questionnaire and 97 of them returned to a pivoting sport. Seven of these athletes had a second ACL injury. Meeting the hop test battery RTS criterion (absolute risk reduction 11%; p = .047) and hop-and-hold test RTS criterion (absolute risk reduction 15%; p = .031) were both significantly associated with a reduced second ACL injury rate. Meeting combined RTS criteria were not significantly associated with second ACL injury rate. Therefore, RTS tests after ACLR should at least comprise a hop test battery or the hop-and-hold test to reduce second ACL injury risk after return to pivoting sport. Also, one-third of all athletes mentioned fear of reinjury as the main reason for not returning to their preinjury (level of) sport. This psychological component should be taken seriously and discussed during rehabilitation.     

Gait mechanics and second ACL rupture: Implications for delaying return‐to‐sport

Second anterior cruciate ligament rupture is a common and devastating injury among young women who return to sport after ACL reconstruction, but it is inadequately understood. The purpose of this study was to compare gait biomechanics and return‐to‐sport time frames in a matched cohort of young female athletes who, after primary ACLR, returned to sport without re‐injury or sustained a second ACL injury. Approximately 6 months after primary reconstruction, 14 young women (age 16 ± 2 years) involved in jumping, cutting, and pivoting sports underwent motion analysis testing after physical therapy and impairment resolution. Following objective return‐to‐sport clearance, seven athletes sustained a second ACL rupture within 20 months of surgery (13.4 ± 4.9 months). We matched them by age, sex, and sport‐level to seven athletes who returned to sports without re‐injury. Data were analyzed using a previously validated, EMG‐informed, patient‐specific musculoskeletal model. Compared to athletes without re‐injury, athletes who sustained a second ACL injury received surgery sooner (p = 0.023), had post‐operative impairments resolved earlier (p = 0.022), reached criterion‐based return‐to‐sport benchmarks earlier (p = 0.024), had higher body mass index (p = 0.039), and walked with lower peak knee flexor muscle forces bilaterally (p = 0.021). Athletes who sustained a second injury also tended to walk with larger (p = 0.089) and more symmetrical peak knee flexion angles and less co‐contraction, all indicative of a more normal gait pattern. Statement of Clinical Significance: Delayed return‐to‐sport clearance even in the absence of gait or clinical impairments following primary ACL reconstruction may be necessary to mitigate second ACL injury risk in young women. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:1894–1901, 2017.

     

Quadriceps strength is an early indicator of return to competitive sports 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adult amateur athletes

Background

Return to sports is one of the important reasons why athletes with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury undergo surgery. There are few reports on return to sports among adult amateur athletes (individuals older than the college age who participate in competitive sports). This study aimed to investigate the return of adult amateur athletes to competitive sports 1 year after ACL reconstruction and to identify the indicators for return to competitive sports.

Methods

Between January 2015 and December 2017, adult amateur athletes who underwent primary ACL reconstruction were retrospectively investigated. The rate of return to competitive sports 1 year after surgery was evaluated. The patients were categorized into two groups: return to sports group (R group) and non-return to sports group (N group). Pre- and postoperative range of motion, pivot-shift test, anteroposterior laxity, quadriceps strength, Lysholm score, and the International Knee Documentation Committee score were compared between the groups.

Results

This study included 78 patients (48 men, 30 women; age range, 22–53 years). Five months after ACL reconstruction, quadriceps strength was significantly lower in the N group than in the R group, denoting muscle weakness in the N group at that time. No significant differences were found in the other items between the groups preoperatively and 1 year after surgery.

Conclusion

In this study, the rate of return to competitive sports of adult amateur athletes 1 year after ACL reconstruction was 76.9%. Quadriceps strength may be an early indicator of return to competitive sports 1 year after reconstruction.

     

Report of the Clinical and Functional Primary Outcomes in Men of the ACL-SPORTS Trial: Similar Outcomes in Men Receiving Secondary Prevention With and Without Perturbation Training 1 and 2 Years After ACL Reconstruction

Background

Athletes often are cleared to return to activities 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; however, knee function measures continue to improve up to 2 years after surgery. Interventions beyond standard care may facilitate successful return to preinjury activities and improve functional outcomes. Perturbation training has been used in nonoperative ACL injury and preoperative ACL reconstruction rehabilitation, but has not been examined in postoperative ACL reconstruction rehabilitation, specifically return to sport rehabilitation.

Questions/Purposes

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were differences at 1 and 2 years after ACL reconstruction between the male SAP (strengthening, agility, and secondary prevention) and SAP+PERT (SAP protocol with the addition of perturbation training) groups with respect to (1) quadriceps strength and single-legged hop limb symmetry; (2) patient-reported knee outcome scores; (3) the proportion who achieve self-reported normal knee function; and (4) the time from surgery to passing return to sport criteria.

Methods

Forty men who had completed ACL reconstruction rehabilitation and met enrollment criteria (3–9 months after ACL reconstruction, > 80% quadriceps strength limb symmetry, no pain, full ROM, minimal effusion) were randomized into the SAP or SAP+PERT groups of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Specialised Post-Operative Return to Sports trial (ACL-SPORTS), a single-blind randomized clinical study of secondary prevention and return to sport. Quadriceps strength, single-legged hopping, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 subjective knee form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-sports and recreation, and KOOS-quality-of-life subscales were collected 1 and 2 years after surgery by investigators blind to group. Athletes were categorized as having normal or abnormal knee function at each time point based on IKDC score, and the time until athletes passed strict return-to-sport criteria was also recorded. T-tests, chi square tests, and analyses of variance were used to identify differences between the treatment groups over time.

Results

There were no differences between groups for quadriceps symmetry (1 year: SAP = 101% ± 14%, SAP+PERT = 101% ± 14%; 2 years: SAP = 103% ± 11%, SAP+PERT = 98% ± 14%; mean differences between groups at 1 year: 0.4 [−9.0 to 9.8], 2 years = 4.5 [−4.3 to 13.1]; mean difference between 1 and 2 years: SAP = −1.0 [−8.6 to 6.6], SAP+PERT = 3.0 [−4.3 to 10.3], p = 0.45) or single-legged hop test limb symmetry. There were no clinically meaningful differences for any patient-reported outcome measures. There was no difference in the proportion of athletes in each group who achieved normal knee function at 1 year (SAP 14 of 19, SAP+PERT 18 of 20, odds ratio 0.31 [0.5–19.0]; p = 0.18); however, the SAP+PERT group had fewer athletes with normal knee function at 2 years (SAP 17 of 17, SAP+PERT 14 of 19, p = 0.03). There were no differences between groups in the time to pass return to sport criteria (SAP = 325 ± 199 days, SAP+PERT = 233 ± 77 days; mean difference 92 [−9 to 192], p = 0.09).

Conclusions

This randomized trial found few differences between an ACL rehabilitation program consisting of strengthening, agility, and secondary prevention and one consisting of those elements as well as perturbation training. In the absence of clinically meaningful differences between groups in knee function and self-reported outcomes measures, the results indicate that perturbation training may not contribute additional benefit to the strengthening, agility, and secondary prevention base of the ACL-SPORTS training program.

Level of Evidence

Level II, therapeutic study.

     

非接触性前十字韧带损伤初次重建术后失效的危险因素

目的探讨非接触性前十字韧带(anterior cruciate ligament,ACL)损伤初次重建术后失效的危险因素。方法2015年11月至2017年5月连续收治并随访2年以上的非接触性ACL损伤而行ACL初次重建的患者178例。随访2年内25例患者出现MRI证实的ACL移植物完全断裂或轴移试验阳性或KT-1000侧侧差值超过5 mm或MRI上静态胫骨前移超过5 mm判定为术后失效,纳入术后失效组;按照1∶2的比例匹配术后2年内未失效者50例,纳入术后未失效组。比较两组患者性别、年龄、体质指数(body mass index,BMI)、患侧分布、半月板损伤侧分布、受伤至手术时间、术前麻醉下KT-1000侧侧差值、轴移试验、随访时间、术前下肢负重位全长X线片上胫骨平台后倾角及胫骨前移的差异,采用多因素Logistic回归分析确定ACL损伤初次重建术后失效的危险因素。结果术后失效组的胫骨平台后倾角为17.21°±2.20°,大于术后未失效组的14.36°±2.72°,差异有统计学意义(t=4.395,P<0.001);术后失效组的术前胫骨前移为(8.29±3.42)mm,大于术后未失效组的(4.09±3.06)mm,差异有统计学意义(t=5.504,P<0.001)。两组性别、年龄、BMI、患侧分布、半月板损伤侧分布、受伤至手术时间、麻醉下KT-1000侧侧差值、轴移试验分度、随访时间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多因素回归分析结果显示胫骨平台后倾角≥17°是ACL术后失效的独立危险因素(OR=15.62,P=0.002),胫骨前移≥6 mm是ACL术后失效的独立危险因素(OR=9.91,P=0.006);而性别、年龄、BMI、半月板是否损伤、轴移试验分度、KT-1000侧侧差值与术后失效无相关性(P>0.05)。结论术前下肢负重位全长X线片上胫骨平台后倾角≥17°和胫骨前移≥6 mm可增加ACL损伤初次重建术后失效的风险。     

Low percentage of patients passed the ‘Back in Action’ test battery 9 months after bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BackgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is recommended in patients who intend to return to high-level sports. However, there is only a 55–80% return to pre-injury level of sports after ACL reconstruction, with a re-injury rate up to 20%. The aim of this study was to determine the percentage of patients passing the Back in Action (BIA) test 9 months after primary bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB) ACL reconstruction, and evaluate the association between passing the BIA test and patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs).MethodsPatients underwent the BIA test 9 months after BPTB ACL reconstruction. In total 103 patients were included. Passing the BIA test (PASSED-group) was defined as a normal or higher score at all sub-tests with limb symmetry index (LSI) ≥90% for the dominant leg and LSI >80% for the non-dominant leg. Patients who did not meet these criteria were defined as the FAILED-group. PROMs included the International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury.ResultsEighteen patients (17.5%) passed the BIA test 9 months after BPTB ACL reconstruction. PROMs were not statistically significant different between the PASSED- and FAILED-group.ConclusionLow percentage of patients passed the BIA test 9 months after BPTB ACL reconstruction. Although current PROMs cut-off values were met, the BIA test results show persistent functional deficits. Therefore, the BIA test could be of additional value in the decision-making process regarding return to sport (RTS). This study highlights the need for additional rehabilitation as RTS in a condition of incomplete recovery may increase the risk of re-injury.Level of evidenceII.     

Chronic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency results in inferior quality hamstring autografts

Background

Availability of a good quality autograft of adequate length is the first step towards a successful knee ligament reconstruction. Being able to predict the quality and length of hamstring autograft can go a long way in making the surgeon’s pre-operative planning a lot easier. The purpose of this study was to find out if any correlation existed between the duration of ACL injury with history of repeated instability episodes and the quality and length of Hamstring graft that was harvested.

Methods

Forty consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using quadrupled Hamstring tendon graft were evaluated with regard to the duration of injury, number of instability episodes and graft characteristics like difficulty in harvesting the graft, quality and length of the graft.

Results

We found a statistically significant difference between the usable length of harvested Hamstring tendon in patients with acute and chronic injury (p = 0.004). There was a significantly high risk of the graft being shorter and of poor quality in patients with chronic injury (odds ratio = 5.7).

Conclusion

Chronicity of ACL injury with repeated strains can cause fibrosis at the musculotendinous junction and result in harvest of a poor quality and short hamstring autograft. A detailed history with regard to duration of injury and repeated instability episodes will help a surgeon plan better when anticipating a sub-optimal graft.

     

Editorial Commentary: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Suture Repair Could Have High Failure Rates in Active Athletes of All Ages

When it comes to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and surgery, age is a proxy for early return to strenuous sports. In addition, premature return to sport is a risk factor for reinjury after ACL surgery. Thus, when considering ACL suture repair as an alternative to ACL graft reconstruction, we must consider that failure rates may be influenced by patient demographic variables, particularly age and activity. In the end, treatment options for young patients who are highly active and eager to make a timely return to sport after ACL injury require careful evaluation.     

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using cryopreserved allografts

Primary ACL reconstruction historically has been done using autograft tissues whereas allografts have been limited to revision cases and patients who are older or with lower physical demands because some animal studies suggested a slower biologic incorporation rate. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the cryopreserved Achilles tendon allograft in primary ACL reconstruction in a consecutive series of athletes. Fifty consecutive patients with a strenuous or moderate preinjury activity level, as defined by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), had ACL reconstruction using cryopreserved Achilles tendon allografts secured with bioabsorbable interference screws. Five patients were professional athletes. The average age of the patients was 36 years (range, 17-50 years). A 3- to 5-year followup study was done in all of the patients using the IKDC form. Tunnel widening was measured in the lateral radiographs at the widest level. The overall outcome was normal or nearly normal in 94% of the patients. No failures were reported in this series. Forty-six patients (92%) returned to their same preinjury sport activity level. The average KT-1000 side-to-side difference was 2.3 mm. Average tibial tunnel widening was 2.7 mm (range, 0-6 mm); no significant correlation was observed between increased tunnel size and a fair or poor clinical outcome. This experience shows that favorable results can be obtained with cryopreserved Achilles tendon allografts in athletes in whom avoiding donor site morbidity may be an issue in terms of a prompt return to sport.     

Anatomical versus Non-Anatomical Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study of Comparison of Knee Stability

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the initial stability of anatomical and non-anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and to determine which would better restore intact knee kinematics. Our hypothesis was that the initial stability of anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction would be superior to that of non-anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Methods

Anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal rotation of the tibia were measured with a computer navigation system in seven pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric knees under two testing conditions (manual maximum anterior force, and a manual maximum anterior force combined with an internal rotational force). Tests were performed at 0, 30, 60, and 90 degrees of flexion with the ACL intact, the ACL transected, and after reconstruction of one side of a pair with either anatomical or non-anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Results

Under manual maximal anterior force, both reconstruction techniques showed no significant difference of ATT when compared to ACL intact knee state at 30° of knee flexion (p > 0.05). Under the combined anterior and internal rotatory force, non-anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction showed significant difference of ATT compared to those in ACL intact group (p < 0.05). In contrast, central anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction showed no significant difference of ATT compared to those in ACL intact group (p > 0.05). Internal rotation of the tibia showed no significant difference in the ACL intact, the ACL transected, non-anatomical reconstructed and anatomical reconstructed knees.

Conclusions

Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction restored the initial stability closer to the native ACL under combined anterior and internal rotational forces when compared to non-anatomical ACL single bundle reconstruction.     

Anterior cruciate ligament tear patterns in young patients: An arthroscopic multicenter study

IntroductionIn the last decade, there has been a renewed interest in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) preservation surgeries in the younger patients. Several ACL preservation techniques such as primary repair, augmented repair, and scaffold repair have been described based on the particular tear type and pattern. The purpose of this study was to determine the distribution of tear patterns in young patients presenting with an acute ACL injury.MethodsA prospective observational study was performed at two tertiary children’s hospitals. Patients under 18 years undergoing ACL reconstruction within 8 weeks of initial injury were included from 2017 to 2019. Tear patterns were classified by two orthopedic surgeons from each of the two centers during arthroscopic ACL reconstruction into 4 types: I. Avulsion off the femur, II. <10% of total ACL length tear from femoral end, III. Mid-substance tear and IV. Single bundle tear. For reliability, the four surgeons classified ACL injury (2 rounds each) based on de-identified intraoperative videos of 33 randomly selected surgical ACL cases. Inter and intra-rater reliability studies were calculated using Kappa statistics.Results224 patients (123 males, 101 females) with mean age of 16 (range: 9–18) years were enrolled in this study. Fifty-seven (25%) patients reported contact injury while 167 (75%) reported non-contact. Isolated ACL injury was recorded in 70 (31%) patients, while concomitant injuries were recorded in 154 patients (69%). The most common associated injury was lateral meniscus tear (35%), followed by lateral and medial meniscus tears (20%). According to our classification, 31 (14%) patients were Type I, 30 (13%) were Type II, 139 (62%) were Type III, 18 (8%) were Type IV. The intra-rater reliability was excellent for 2 reviewers, good for 1 and marginal for another. The overall inter-rater reliability for all 4 reviewers was marginal for both readings. There was no statistical difference in the occurrence of type of tear based on the mechanism of injury (contact vs non-contact) or age of the patients.ConclusionsThis is the first multicenter study using an arthroscopic assessment to classify the location of ACL tear in the young population. It gives us further insight on the possible application for surgeries to preserve the ACL in this group. Larger studies incorporating these findings with MRI evaluation and ACL repair techniques are needed to confirm the utility of this information to decide the eligibility for repair in pediatric patients.     

Partial anterior cruciate ligament tears treated with intraligamentary plasma rich in growth factors

AIM: To evaluate the effect of the application of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF)-Endoret to the remaining intact bundle in partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears.METHODS: A retrospective review of the rate of return to play in football players treated with the application of PRGF-Endoret in the remaining intact bundle in partial ACL injuries that underwent surgery for knee instability. Patients with knee instability requiring revision surgery for remnant ACL were selected. PRGF was applied in the wider part of posterolateral bundle and the time it took patients to return to their full sporting activities at the same level before the injury was evaluated.RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were reviewed. Three had a Tegner activity level of 10 and the remaining 16 level 9. The time between the injury and the time of surgery was 5.78 wk (SD 1.57). In total, 81.75% (16/19) returned to the same pre-injury level of sport activity (Tegner 9-10). 17 males and 2 females were treated. The rate of associated injury was 68.42% meniscal lesions and 26.31% cartilage lesions. The KT-1000 values were normalized in all operated cases. One patient was not able to return to sport due to the extent of their cartilage lesions. The 15 patients with Tegner activity level 9 returned to play at an average of 16.20 wk (SD 1.44) while the 3 patients with Tegner activity level 10 did so in 12.33 wk (SD 1.11).CONCLUSION: With one remaining intact bundle the application of PRGF-Endoret in instability cases due to partial ACL tear showed high return to sport rates at pre- injury level in professional football players.     

Epidemiological profile of sports-related knee injuries in northern India: An observational study at a tertiary care centre

BackgroundSports-related knee injuries occur commonly in athletes. However, there is no published epidemiological study from India till date.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to identify common injuries sustained by Indian athletes participating in different sports and to study various associated demographic features. A secondary objective was to investigate different factors, which may affect return to sport by the athlete.Study designCross-sectional study (observational study).Study centreSports injury clinic, PGIMER, Chandigarh.MethodsOut of 465 athletes who presented to us with sports-related knee injuries over a 5-year period, 363 athletes (from 24 different sports) with complete records were identified. Data were analysed for demographic features, type of sport, mechanism of injury, injury scenario, athlete's level of play, injury duration at presentation, injury patterns and type of management. Telephonic interviews were conducted with each athlete to enquire about return to sport and time lost in sport due to the knee injury. Factors associated with return to sport were investigated using statistical tests of association.ResultsSoccer was found to be the most common sport associated with knee injuries accounting for 30.6% of the injuries followed by kabaddi (20.9%). The most common mechanism was non-contact injury (64.4%). Competitive injuries were found to be significantly more than practice/training injuries (p < 0.0001). The most common injuries noted were ACL tears (n = 314) followed by meniscus injuries (n = 284) and the most common combination of injuries were an ACL tear with medial meniscus tear (n = 163). Only 39.8% of the athletes returned to sport. Mean duration of time lost in sport among those who returned to sport was 8.84 months. Return to sport was significantly associated with body mass index, level of competitiveness of the athlete and type of management (p = 0.017, 0.045 and <0.0001, respectively).ConclusionKnee injuries take a huge toll on an athlete's career as observed in this study. Prevention of knee injuries is of paramount importance and more focussed epidemiological studies are needed for formulating policies to prevent sports injuries in both professional and amateur athletes.Level of evidenceIV.     

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a double bundle hamstring autograft configuration in patients under 30 years

BACKGROUND Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction(ACLR) has a high incidence of re-tear in younger patients.Despite comparable functional outcomes,the incidence of retear using single and double bundle ACLR methods has not been well reported.AIM To hypothesize that double bundle hamstring ACLR has a lower graft rupture rate compared with single bundle hamstring ACLR grafts in young patients.METHODS One hundred and twelve patients 30 years of age at the time of primary double bundle ACLR were eligible for study participation.91(81.3%) could be contacted,with a mean age of 20.4 years(range 13-29) and mean post-operative follow-up time of 59 mo(range 25-107).Telephone questionnaires evaluated the incidence(and timing) of subsequent re-tear and contralateral ACL tear,further surgeries,incidence and time to return to sport,and patient satisfaction.RESULTS Of the 91 patients,there were 6(6.6%,95% Cl:1.4-11.7) ACL graft re-ruptures,with a mean time to re-rupture of 28 mo(range 12-84).Fourteen patients(15.4%)experienced a contralateral ACL rupture and 14 patients(15.4%) required further surgery to their ipsilateral knee.fifty patients(54.9%) returned to pre-injury level of sport.Of those 20 years(n=45),4 patients(8.9%,95% Cl:0.4-17.3)experienced a re-rupture,with mean time to re-injury 15 mo(range 12-24).Comparative analysis with existing literature and revealed a non-significant Chisquared statistic of 2.348(P=0.125).CONCLUSION A trend existed toward lower graft rupture rates in young patients undergoing double bundle ACLR utilizing a hamstring autograft,compared with rates reported after single bundle ACLR.     

Pre-operative Joint Inflammation has no Bearing on Outcome of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 1-Year Follow-Up; a Prospective Study

BackgroundTo study the effect of pre-operative joint inflammation on clinical outcome at 1 year follow-up following ACL reconstruction surgery.MethodsMale patients, aged 18–40 years, suffering from isolated ACL injury were included. All patients were randomly divided into two groups based on the type of graft used: Group A: semitendinosus gracilis graft with preserved insertions (STG-PI), Group B: bone-patellar tendon-bone graft (BPTB). Patients were categorised based on the time of presentation after injury: (a) within 6 weeks of injury, (b) between 6 and 12 weeks of injury, (c) after 12 weeks of injury. Synovial fluid levels of Interlukin-1, Interlukin-6 and TNF-α were measured in all the ACL deficient knees by taking a joint fluid sample intra-operatively.ResultsThe total number of patients in the study was 59; 23 in group A (STG-PI) and 36 in group B (BPTB). Mean age of patients was 26 ± 5.146 years. 14 out of 59 (23.7%) patients presented within 6 weeks of injury, 16 (27.11%) patients presented between 6 and 12 weeks after injury and 29 (49.1%) patients presented after 12 weeks of injury. IL-6 levels were significantly high in group with < 6 weeks of injury than in group with > 12 weeks since injury. IL-6 had significant correlation with VAS scores, KT 1000, Lysholm knee scores and Tegner level of activity. There was no difference in outcome (pain scores, mechanical stability, Lysholm knee score and Tegner level of activity) at 1 year follow-up when patients with different time intervals since injury were compared.ConclusionThe clinical outcome in terms of pain score, mechanical stability, functional scores and return to sporting activity is comparable, irrespective of the time since injury, at short term follow-up.     

Editorial Commentary: Diagnosis and Treatment of Generalized Joint Hypermobility in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Generalized joint hypermobility (GJH), or laxity, is defined as hyperextensibility of the synovial joints. Hypermobility is caused by alterations in the connective tissues, in turn caused by various factors including impaired function of collagen proteins. For measurement of knee GJH, we highly recommend using the Beighton score, the most frequently used method in both the sports medicine and other literature. Our recommendations on how to treat patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury with generalized joint hypermobility include the following: (1) use patellar-tendon or quadriceps tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction; (2) always consider performing a lateral extra-articular tenodesis; and (3) make sure patients pass a return to sport test battery including strength, hop performance, subjective knee function, and movement quality. Delay to return to sport may be as long as 1 year after surgery.