类风湿关节炎患者疼痛评估量表的汉化与信效度检验

目的 引入并汉化类风湿关节炎患者疼痛评估量表（Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain Scale,RAPS）,并检验其信效度。 方法 2020年6月—10月,按照Brislin翻译模式进行翻译、回译、检译,进行文化调试,形成中文版RAPS量表。成立专家委员会检验其内容效度,对上海市某三级甲等医院的236例患者进行调查,测定量表信度。 结果 中文版RAPS共24个条目,各维度Cronbach’s α系数为0.881~0.954,总量表Cronbach’s α系数为0.969。内容效度指数为0.97,各条目均高于0.80,共析出3个公因子,分别为生理维度、感觉维度、情感认知维度,累计方差贡献率为73.582%。 结论 中文版的RAPS具有较好的信效度,适合中国文化背景下类风湿关节炎患者疼痛水平的评估与测量。     

疼痛共情量表的汉化及其在医学生中的信效度检验

目的引进并汉化疼痛共情量表(the Empathy for Pain Scale,EPS),检验中文版EPS在医学生中的信效度。方法经过翻译、回译、语义分析、专家咨询及文化调试,最终确定中文版EPS条目。于2018年6—10月,采用便利抽样法,选取531名在校本科生进行问卷调查。采用相关分析法和临界比值法进行项目分析,采用内容效度、结构效度、效标关联效度进行量表的效度检验,计算Cronbach'sα系数、折半信度检验量表的内在一致性。结果中文版EPS保留原12个条目,析出2个因子,2个因子命名为身心不适反应和移情反应,累计方差贡献率为69.059%。量表各条目的内容效度为0.83~1.00,总内容效度为0.94。中文版EPS总分与中文版人际反应指针量表(IRI-C)得分呈正相关(r=0.370,P<0.01);量表的Cronbach'sα系数为0.914,身心不适反应、移情反应2个维度的Cronbach'sα系数分别为0.935和0.775,量表的折半信度为0.896。结论中文版EPS包含4个场景、2个维度,具有良好的信效度,可用于测量我国医学生的疼痛共情水平。     

Reliability and validity of the Icelandic version of the Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) Scale

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a burdensome disease that increases distress among people with diabetes. OBJECTIVES: To test the validity and reliability of an Icelandic version of the problem area in diabetes scale (PAID) and to assess the hitherto unknown distress level of Icelandic people with insulin requiring diabetes. DESIGN: Methodological research design. SETTING: Diabetes clinics. PARTICIPANTS: People with insulin-dependent diabetes, between 18 and 61 years. METHODS: All instruments were translated using a back-translation technique. Participants answered three consecutive questionnaires in succession, the PAID scale, the diabetes empowerment scale (DES) and the diabetes knowledge test (DKT). Principical component analysis with varimax rotation was conducted on the PAID scale to identify latent factors. RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed two factors: (a) distress in relation to life with diabetes, with Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.93 and (b) distress in relation to management of diabetes, with Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.88, for PAID overall Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.94. PAID showed neither floor nor ceilings effects. Propositions set to indicate validity were generally met. However, PAID's factor structure and predictive validity needs to be tested further. CONCLUSIONS: The Icelandic version of PAID is sufficiently psychometrically robust. PAID is simple to administer and by using the scale clinicians can identify people at risk for developing diabetes-related distress. The results are comparable to results from studies in other countries using the PAID scale.     

汉化版关节炎患者自我效能量表信度效度的测试研究

目的探讨分析汉化版关节炎患者自我效能量表的信度与效度。方法专家小组翻译关节炎自我效能量表,并对其进行文化调适和对量表的内容效度进行评价,然后进行预试验并修订;回收有效问卷90份,并随机抽取其中40例研究对象于2周后进行重测。采用相关分析法、因子分析法等对结果进行统计学分析。结果关节炎患者自我效能量表的内部一致性信度Cronbaeh’s仅系数为0．920,各维度的Cronbach’sα系数为0．807～0．831,重测信度系数为0．800～0．921;各维度之间以及各维度与总分之间的相关系数r值分别为0．705～0．799、0．875～0．921;3个维度整体解释的累积变异量是56．47％。结论汉化版关节炎患者自我效能量表具有良好的信度和效度,适合关节炎患者自我效能的评价。     

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale

PurposeTo translate and apply the Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS) for Chinese populations and test the reliability and validity of the modified scale.MethodA total of 150 lung cancer patients were recruited from three tertiary hospitals in Shandong province and were tested using the Chinese version of CLCSS to assess its reliability and validity.ResultThe Cronbach's α coefficient of the Chinese version of CLCSS and the four subscales ranged from 0.599 to 0.884, and the test–retest reliability ranged from 0.601 to 0.881. The content validity index of the scale was 0.875. Four factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis that explained 58.6% of the total variance.ConclusionThe Chinese version of CLCSS is a reliable and valid measure of stigma among Chinese patients with lung cancer.     

工作场所母乳喂养支持量表的汉化及信效度检验

目的:翻译并修订工作场所母乳喂养支持量表（WBSS）,并检验其信效度。方法:采用Brislin翻译模式对WBSS进行翻译-回译;通过文化调试和预试验对量表条目进行修改完善。采用便利抽样法,于2020年6—9月,选取铜仁市妇幼保健院320名儿保科儿童母亲作为研究对象。采用中文版WBSS调查儿童母亲的工作场所母乳喂养支持情...     

Reliability and validity of the Faces Pain Scale with older adults

BACKGROUND: The Faces Pain Scale (FPS) is effective with older adults in clinical assessment of pain intensity. The 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) has universally adapted for assessment of pain intensity. The commonly used versions of the FPS have six, seven or nine faces. OBJECTIVES: We proposed an 11 face modified version of the McGrath nine face FPS to compare with the 0-10 NRS without the mathematical translation. The psychometric properties of the proposed version were also investigated in a sample of Korean older adults. DESIGN: This study employed methodological research design. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 31 older adults was recruited through local senior citizen centers to examine the construct validity and the test-retest reliability. For the concurrent validity testing, a sample of 85 older adults with chronic pain was recruited through a general hospital and an oriental medical hospital. METHODS: The construct validity was examined by determining if the subjects perceive the FPS as representing pain and they agree on the rank of each face. The test-retest reliability was examined at a 2-week interval. The concurrent validity was examined by using the NRS and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). RESULTS: Subjects perceived the 11 FPS as a pain measure, and the subjects' agreements in the rank ordering of the faces were almost perfect (Kendall's W = .93, p < .001). Cohen's kappa of .61 (p < .001) for test-retest reliability was acceptable in the cognitively intact subjects. Concurrent validity measured by the correlation between the FPS and the NRS (r = .73, p < .001) and the VAS (r = .73, p < .001) was supported. CONCLUSIONS: These results supported the appropriateness of the 11 FPS for use with the older adults in clinical practice to measure pain intensity. Additionally, this study provided cross-cultural evidence to evaluate usefulness of the FPS.     

中文版标准Greene更年期量表的信度和效度评价

目的 初步评价标准Greene更年期量表中文版的信度和效度。 方法 采取方便取样法,选取230例就诊的40~60岁女性为研究对象,以标准Greene更年期量表(GCS)和更年期量表(MRS)为工具,由受试者进行GCS和MRS自我测评,分析GCS内部一致性及与MRS的相关性。1周后随机抽取其中104例受试者进行GCS重测,检验GCS的信度。采用探索性因素分析方法,对GCS各维度进行结构效度分析。 结果 GCS量表的Cronbach′s α系数为0.95,重测信度为0.94,P<0.01。全部条目的平均内容效度为0.90。中文版GCS与MRS各因子的Pearson相关系数为0.35~0.77,P<0.01。 结论 标准Greene更年期量表信度和效度良好,可作为早期更年期症状的筛查工具。     

中文版自我感受负担量表在癌症患者中应用的信效度评价

目的 研究中文版自我感受负担量表(self-perceived burden scale,SPBS)在癌症患者中应用的信、效度.方法 翻译并形成中文版SPBS,采用专家法测量其内容效度.进行预实验,对量表的表面效度进行评价,经过研究小组反复修改和调整后,形成最终量表.对220例癌症患者进行问卷调查以评定该工具的信、效度.结果 中文版SPBS共有8个条目,其Cronbach's α系数为0.874.因子分析得出2个公因子,累计方差贡献率为61.004％.结论 中文版SPBS具有良好的信、效度,适合中国文化背景下癌症患者自我感受负担的测量.     

中文版孕期身体活动问卷信效度评定

目的 探讨中文版孕期身体活动问卷(Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire,PPAQ)在孕妇孕期身体活动状况评定中的信、效度.方法 首先通过系统的翻译、修订、回译、专家函询,将英文版PPAQ引入、修订,确立中文版PPAQ问卷的内容和条目,并进行效度检验;然后对30例孕妇进行问卷调查,同时佩戴Live Pod-02型智能人体运动能耗仪7d,然后再次填写问卷,用两种方式评定、测量孕妇在1周内的能量消耗,进行相关性分析,以测定该工具的信度.结果 中文版PPAQ有31个条目,其表面效度较高,内容效度为0.940;问卷重测信度为0.944,问卷与能耗仪测量相关系数为0.768 (P＜0.01).结论 中文版PPAQ具有良好的信效度,适合中国文化背景下孕妇孕期身体活动状况的评估与测量.     

中文版护理实习生自主学习准备度量表信效度研究

目的译制中文版护理实习生自主学习准备度量表(Self-directed Learning Readiness Scale for Nursing Education,SDLRS),并对其信度和效度进行初步的评价。方法翻译并修订SDLRS量表,并采用修订的中文版SDLRS量表对603名护理实习生进行调查,对测定结果进行信度和效度分析。结果中文版SDLRS量表总的Cronbach'sα系数为0.968,其3个维度(自我管理、热爱学习、自我控制)的Cronbach'sα值均大于0.9。总量表重测信度为0.861。内容效度各条目的内容效度比(CVI)为0.9-1.0,全部条目的平均CVI为0.95。各维度得分与总分之间的相关系数均大于它们与其他领域间的Pearson相关系数,均在0.8以上,表明该量表具有非常好的内部一致性。因子分析得到5个公因子,共解释了62.346%的方差。结论中文版量表是一份具有较好信度和效度的评定工具,可用于评价我国护理实习生自主学习准备的程度。     

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: Scale development

Background

Recovery is defined as a complex process of developing new meaning and purpose in life as one grows beyond the catastrophic effects of mental illness. To promote this process, the necessity of recovery assessment using psychometric measures has been emphasized; however, no measure to assess the individual recovery process is available in Japan.

Objective

To develop a Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) and to examine its reliability and validity.

Design

The study was a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.

Settings

Participants came from 1 daycare, 1 outpatient clinic of a psychiatric hospital, 5 sheltered workshops used for social rehabilitation, 3 peer support groups, and 6 inpatient wards of 2 psychiatric hospitals.

Participants

The survey included 237 participants who had chronic mental illness and were aged 20 or older. For analysis, we used data from 209 participants who had no missing values on the RAS, with 58.9% male and a mean age of 48.3 years.

Methods

The questionnaire consisted of the Japanese version of the 24-item RAS, developed by the authors with focus group cognitive interviews and the translation-back-translation procedure. Also included were the Herth Hope Index, Empowerment scale, Resilience scale, SF-8, and BASIS-32. Internal consistency reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficients, and test-retest reliability was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted kappa in a randomly selected subsample (n = 24). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and correlations with other scales were used to examine the factor-based validity, concurrent and construct validity of the RAS.

Results

Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.89 for the overall RAS. ICC and weighted kappa generally indicated good test-retest reliability. Factor analysis of the RAS items yielded five factors: (a) goal/success orientation and hope, (b) reliance on others, (c) personal confidence, (d) no domination by symptoms, and (e) willingness to ask for help. The item “Coping with mental illness is no longer the main focus of my life” showed an inverse factor loading. The overall RAS score significantly and positively correlated with the Herth Hope Index, Empowerment scale, Resilience scale, and SF-8 mental component summary; there was a significant negative correlation with BASIS-32 psychiatric symptoms and functional impairment (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

This study confirmed the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the 24-item RAS among people with chronic mental illness currently living in communities and inpatient ward settings in Japan.     

Development and validation of a short form of the Chinese version of the State Anxiety Scale for Children

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of a simplified instrument for use in busy clinical settings to measure and differentiate anxiety levels of children. OBJECTIVES: To develop a short form of the Chinese version of the State Anxiety Scale for Children (CSAS-C) and test psychometric properties of the new form. DESIGN: The study was divided into two phases with phase one aimed at developing a short form of the CSAS-C, while phase two aimed at testing psychometric properties of the new form. A test-retest, within-subjects design was employed. Children (7-12 years of age) admitted for surgery in a day surgery unit during two consecutive years' summer holiday were invited to participate in the study. In phase one, selected participants (N=112) were asked to respond to the CSAS-C. In phase two, selected participants (N=82) were asked to respond to the short form of the CSAS-C. RESULTS: Using exploratory factor analysis, a subset of 10 items, which was highly correlated with scores obtained from the full form (r=0.92) and, which had acceptable internal consistency (r=0.83) was developed. The psychometric properties of this short form have been empirically tested, showing adequate internal consistency reliability, good concurrent validity, and excellent construct validity. CONCLUSION: This study addresses a gap in the literature by developing a 10-item short form of the CSAS-C. Results indicate that this short form is an appropriate and objective assessment tool for measuring anxiety levels of Chinese children in a busy clinical setting where time constraints make unfeasible the use of the full form.     

中文版成套神经心理测验的信度和效度研究

目的评估中文版成套神经心理测验(NTB)的信度和效度。方法为横断面研究,对118例被试者进行简易智力状况检查(MMSE)、阿尔茨海默病评定量表认知分量表(ADAS-cog)与NTB测验,其中30例在4周后进行NTB重测。从同质信度、重测信度和分测验内部一致性进行信度检验;从结构效度和效标关联效度进行效度检验,结构效度包括因素分析和因素结构,效标关联效度包括基线MMSE、ADAS-cog与NTBz分的相关性。结果 NTB测验的Cronbachα系数为0.824。除分类流畅性测验的重测相关系数为0.504外,其余各分测验的重测相关系数为0.590～0.856。NTB各分测验z分与合成z分的相关系数为0.693～0.872;各分测验之间的相关系数为0.297～0.848。主成分分析显示2个特征根≥1的因子可解释方差的71.198%。NTBz分与MMSE、ADAS-cog总分之间的相关系数分别为0.874、-0.799。结论 NTB的同质信度、重测信度、结构效度、效标效度均较理想,符合心理测验的要求。     

护士工作压力源量表的信度效度分析

目的考核中国护士工作压力源量表的信度和效度。方法抽取昆明市某综合医院的护士476名,采用中国护士工作压力源量表及工作疲溃感量表(Maslach Burnout Inventory,MBI)中的情感疲倦问卷进行调查。随机抽取50名在2周后进行重测,计算该量表的重测信度;用因子分析(Factor Analysis)、CronbachTsα系数、Pearson相关系数r、独立样本t检验,考察量表的信度与效度。结果因子分析结果显示,管理及人际关系方面、护理专业及工作方面、时间分配及工作量问题方面的各条目因素负荷与原量表结构基本一致;而工作环境及仪器设备方面、病人护理方面的条目的因素负荷则与原量表结构的差异较大。结论中国护士工作压力源量表除结构效度需要做进一步的修订外,信度及效度较好,能够较真实而稳定地反映出与护理职业关系密切的工作压力源。     

中文版儿童戒断症状评估量表在危重患儿中的信效度分析

目的 翻译中文版儿童戒断症状评估量表并进行信效度检验。 方法 应用 Brislin 双人翻译及回译法对量表进行文化调适,形成中文版儿童戒断症状评估量表。对 56 例患儿的 582 次测量结果进行分析,评价其信度与效度。结果 中文版 WAT鄄1 共有 11 个条目,因子分析提取 4 个公因子,累积贡献率为 57.54% 。 该量表 Cronbach ’ s α 系数为0.812 ,各因子 Cronbach ’ s α 系数为 0.701~0.942 ,组内相关系数（ intraclass correlation coefficient , ICC ）为 0.930 。 中文版WAT鄄1 量表的内容效度为 0.910 ,各维度间的相关系数为 0.292~0.530 ,各维度与量表总分间的相关系数为 0.344~0.638 ,均具有统计学意义（ P<0.01 ）。 ROC 曲线显示,以 WAT鄄1 总分 ≥3 分为判定戒断症状发生的临界值,特异度为 76.18% 、敏感度为 83.36% 。 结论 中文版 WAT鄄1 量表具有较好的信度和效度,且以总分 ≥3 分作为临界值,判定是否发生戒断症状,可以应用于儿童镇痛镇静药物戒断症状的评估。     

炎症性肠病痛苦量表的汉化及信效度检验

目的 对炎症性肠病痛苦量表进行汉化,并检验中文版量表的信效度。方法 按照Brislin翻译模型将英文版炎症性肠病痛苦量表翻译成中文,并进行文化调试。采用便利抽样法,选取2022年2月—6月在厦门市某三级甲等医院消化内科就诊或住院的178例炎症性肠病患者进行调查,检验中文版量表的信效度。结果 中文版炎症性肠病痛苦量表共1个维度,28个条目,量表总的Cronbach’s α系数为0.978,重测信度为0.68(95%CI为0.42～0.84);量表水平的内容效度指数为0.964,条目水平的内容效度指数为0.800～1.000。该量表得分与医院焦虑抑郁量表中焦虑、抑郁分量表得分均呈正相关（r=0.712,P<0.001;r=0.601,P<0.001）。结论 中文版炎症性肠病痛苦量表具有良好的信效度,可用于评估炎症性肠病患者的疾病痛苦水平。     

中文版阿尔茨海默病知识量表信效度研究

目的 检验中文版阿尔茨海默病知识量表(ADKS)的信度和效度.方法 采用翻译并修订的中文版ADKS对阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者、照料者各200例,以及医护人员200名进行调查,分析其信度和效度.结果 总量表和7个维度的重测信度为0.732～0.879,总量表分半信度为0.556,Cronbach'sα系数为0.756.量表各维度得分与量表总分之间相关系数为0.551～0.705;因子分析共提取7个公因子,累积方差贡献率为64.72％.结论 中文版ADKS具有较好的信效度,适合中国文化背景下AD患者、照料者及医护人员AD知识的测量.     

修订版控制态度量表的汉化及信效度检验

目的 引进修订版控制态度量表(Control Attitudes Scale-Revised,CAS-R)并测定其中文版信效度.方法 使用CAS-R量表对125例心内科住院的心脏病患者进行感知控制力测定,并对测定结果进行信效度分析.结果 CAS-R量表重测信度为0.825,分半信度为0.512,整个量表的Cronbach α系数为0.874,各维度的Cronbach α系数在0.735～0.862;因子分析共提取3个公因子,累积方差贡献率为54.128％,且各条目在其公因子上的因子载荷均大于0.4;采用贝克抑郁量表(Beck Depression Inventory,BDI)做效标效度,CAS-R得分与BDI得分的Pearson相关系数为-0.59,与BDI 3个维度自我效能感、心理控制源和习得无助感的Pearson相关系数分别为-0.48、-0.51和0.42.结论 CAS-R中文版具有较好的信效度,适合评价心脏病患者的感知控制力.     

失禁相关性皮炎干预工具的汉化及信效度检验

目的对失禁相关性皮炎干预工具进行汉化,并检验其信效度。方法征得原作者Junkin教授同意后,对原版失禁相关性皮炎干预工具进行汉化,选择在失禁护理领域具有较高学术水平及丰富临床经验的15名专家进行2轮咨询,确定中文版工具,并检验其效度,同时在某三级甲等医院对中文版工具进行信度检验。结果中文版失禁相关性皮炎干预工具各条目内容效度(I-CVI)为0.80~1.00,工具内容效度(S-CVI)为0.98,评定者间信度r=0.928(P<0.01),重测信度为0.996(P<0.01)。结论中文版失禁相关性皮炎干预工具具有良好的信效度,可指导临床护理人员对失禁患者进行评估和干预。