Value of echotomography for the diagnosis of lithiasis of the common bile duct

The accuracy of ultrasonography (US) for the diagnosis of cholelithiasis and for dilatation of the intra- and extra-hepatic biliary tree is well known. However, the value of US for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones remains poorly defined. We performed a prospective study in 100 patients who were referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); all the examinations were carried out by the same sonographist in the 24 h preceding the ERCP. Fifty patients had choledocholithiasis, 20 patients had obstruction of the bile ducts without lithiasis and the common bile duct (CBD) was free in 30 patients. The sensitivity of US for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis was 40 p. 100, the specificity 90 p. 100. The positive and negative predictive values of the "CBD stone" sign was 80 p. 100 and 60 p. 100 respectively. In a total of 30 false negatives, the CBD could not be explored in 4 cases, dilatation of the CBD was missed in one case, and obstruction of the CBD by an other disease was diagnosed in 2; in all the other cases, US was able to appreciate the CBD size as well as the ERCP. In the 20 patients with an obstructed CBD but without choledocholithiasis, US diagnosed a stone in 5 cases. Age, serum bilirubin, existence of a previous cholecystectomy, technical difficulties, stone size were comparable in patients with true positive tests and in patients with false negative tests. However the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis was more frequently achieved in patients with dilated CBD over 10 mm (p less than 0.05) and in patients with multiple stones.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Utility of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Evaluation of Idiopathic Abdominal Pain

We investigated the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 86 consecutive patients with idiopathic chronic or recurrent abdominal pain. There were 18 males and 68 females with a mean age of 48 yr. Forty patients (47%) had previous cholecystectomy. Patients were divided into two groups: group I (normal serum alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin) (n = 52), and group II (elevated serum alkaline phosphatase and/or total bilirubin) (n = 34). Panereatograms were normal in all patients, including five with pancreas divisum. Cholangiograms were abnormal in 10 of the 34 patients in group II (30%), and in only three of the 52 patients in group I (6%) ( p = 0.003). Bile duct stones were present in 18% of the patients in group II, and in none of the patients in group I ( p = 0.003). Of the 40 post-cholecystectomy patients, four patients had bile duct stones and five had common bile duct dilation without stones. However, no stones were found in any post-cholecystectomy patients with normal liver tests. Of the 46 patients with gallbladder in situ , two patients with abnormal liver tests had common bile duct stones and two patients had common bile duct dilation without stones. These results indicate that, among patients with idiopathic abdominal pain, cholangiography should be performed primarily in those with abnormal liver tests; however, further investigation with pancreatography is unnecessary.     

EUS Yield in Evaluating Biliary Dilatation in Patients with Normal Serum Liver Enzymes

The finding of common bile duct (CBD) dilatation on abdominal imaging frequently results in additional testing. It has been our impression that endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) evaluation of a dilated CBD is a low-yield examination in the setting of normal serum liver enzymes. We therefore sought to evaluate the EUS yield in evaluating CBD dilatation in patients with normal as compared to elevated serum liver enzymes. A retrospective review was performed to identify patients referred for EUS evaluation of a dilated CBD in the absence of obvious pathology on prior imaging. Charts were reviewed for patient symptoms, presence of elevated serum liver enzymes, imaging studies before EUS, and EUS findings. Exclusion criteria included clinical jaundice, known biliary stricture, mass lesion or stone, and previously sphincterotomy and/or stent placement. Forty-seven patients were identified: 32 with normal and 15 with elevated serum liver enzymes. There was no difference in mean CBD diameter between these two groups (8.51 vs. 8.79 mm, p=0.854). Of the entire group, 15 patients had undergone prior magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP); an additional 7 patients had undergone prior endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). EUS findings to explain CBD dilatation were found more commonly in patients with elevated compared with normal serum liver enzymes (53% vs. 6%, p=0.001). Periampullary diverticula and choledocholithiasis were the most common findings; of 32 patients with normal serum liver enzymes, one periampullary diverticulum and one CBD stone were found, respectively. The CBD stone had been missed by prior MRCP examination. Of 15 patients with elevated serum liver enzymes, there were 3 cases of choledocholithiasis, 4 periampullary diverticula, and 1 ampullary tumor. EUS should be the test of choice for further evaluation of CBD dilatation when index imaging is normal. Although the EUS yield is low in cases of biliary dilatation in the setting of normal serum liver enzymes, its preferential use would potentially avoid unnecessary MRCP and ERCP.     

Brown pigment stones in the common bile duct: reduced bilirubinate diconjugate in bile

BACKGROUND: Bilirubin is the main component of most common bile duct stones. Normally, almost all bilirubin in bile is conjugated to glucuronic acid or some other sugar moiety. These conjugates are unstable and liable to deconjugation. Unconjugated bilirubin is insoluble and may precipitate as the calcium salt found in brown pigment stones. The pattern of bilirubin conjugates in common duct bile of patients with choledocholithiasis has been unknown. METHODS: In a clinical series of 55 patients with choledocholithiasis common-duct bile was aspirated, and the bilirubin conjugates analyzed with high-performance liquid chromatography. One stone from each patient was analyzed for cholesterol and bilirubin content to determine stone type. RESULTS: Sixteen patients had cholesterol stones, 38 patients had brown pigment stones, and 1 patient had a black stone. Patients with pigment stones had a lower percentage of bilirubin diglucuronide (median, 60.3%; interquartile range, 49.7%-67.3%) than patients with cholesterol stones (64.0%; 60.2%-73.3%) (Mann-Whitney, P=0.015). No significant difference was found for the other bilirubin conjugates, total bilirubin, or biliary pH when pigment and cholesterol stone patients were compared. The time of bile sampling in relation to papillotomy and treatment of cholestasis was not associated with the low percentage of bilirubin diglucuronide. The observation of reduced values for bilirubin diglucuronide could not be ascribed to duodenal diverticula or Billroth-II gastric resection. CONCLUSION: The percentage of the main bilirubinate conjugate, bilirubin diglucuronide, is decreased in the common duct bile of patients with pigmented compared with cholesterol stones.     

Brown Pigment Stones in the Common Bile Duct: Reduced Bilirubinate Diconjugate in Bile

Background: Bilirubin is the main component of most common bile duct stones. Normally, almost all bilirubin in bile is conjugated to glucuronic acid or some other sugar moiety. These conjugates are unstable and liable to deconjugation. Unconjugated bilirubin is insoluble and may precipitate as the calcium salt found in brown pigment stones. The pattern of bilirubin conjugates in common duct bile of patients with choledocholithiasis has been unknown. Methods: In a clinical series of 55 patients with choledocholithiasis common-duct bile was aspirated, and the bilirubin conjugates analyzed with high-performance liquid chromatography. One stone from each patient was analyzed for cholesterol and bilirubin content to determine stone type. Results: Sixteen patients had cholesterol stones, 38 patients had brown pigment stones, and 1 patient had a black stone. Patients with pigment stones had a lower percentage of bilirubin diglucuronide (median, 60.3%; interquartile range, 49.7%-67.3%) than patients with cholesterol stones (64.0%; 60.2%-73.3%) (Mann-Whitney, P = 0.015). No significant difference was found for the other bilirubin conjugates, total bilirubin, or biliary pH when pigment and cholesterol stone patients were compared. The time of bile sampling in relation to papillotomy and treatment of cholestasis was not associated with the low percentage of bilirubin diglucuronide. The observation of reduced values for bilirubin diglucuronide could not be ascribed to duodenal diverticula or Billroth-II gastric resection. Conclusion: The percentage of the main bilirubinate conjugate, bilirubin diglucuronide, is decreased in the common duct bile of patients with pigmented compared with cholesterol stones.     

Symptoms, diagnosis and endoscopic management of common bile duct stones

Symptomatic BDS commonly cause significant morbidity and attempt at stone removal should be attempted if possible. Complications of CBDS include biliary colic, jaundice, cholangitis and pancreatitis. Investigations aimed to predict the presence of stones within the bile duct include serum bilirubin, AST, ALP, common bile duct diameter and age as independent predictors of choledocholithiasis. TUS is a sensitive test in detecting bile duct dilatation but the sensitivity is reduced in its ability to detect choledocholithiasis. A NIH consensus statement found that ERC, MRC and EUS were comparable in their sensitivities, specificities and accuracy rates for detection of choledocholithiasis. ERC and stone removal using a balloon or basket is often performed following EST. EBD may be performed if patients have uncorrected coagulopathies but the risk of pancreatitis is higher than for EST (although the risk of bleeding complications is lower for EBD). ML is often required in difficult to remove CBDS and using this device, CBDS can be removed in 90–95% of cases. Other forms of lithotripsy including laser lithotripsy and EHL are confined to specialised centres and the evidence for their use is based on small studies. ESWL may clear stones from the bile duct in up to 93% of patients but frequently ERC and stone fragment removal is required post ESWL. The role of medical therapy in difficult to remove CBDS (or in CBDS in patients with severe co-morbid illness preventing ERC + stone removal) is still currently uncertain due to a lack of large randomised control trials.     

Value of ultrasound and liver function tests in determining the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in unexplained abdominal pain.

The value of serum liver function tests and abdominal ultrasound as screening tests of the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was determined in patients with unexplained abdominal pain without associated jaundice. In 1989 and 1990 1005 ERCPs were undertaken, of which 138 (14%) were for this indication. The duct or ducts of interest were delineated by ERCP in 95% of patients. The lesions found were bile duct stones in 10 patients, chronic pancreatitis in five, pancreatic carcinoma in one, peptic ulcer or duodenitis in four. A satisfactory ultrasound examination had been performed in 94% of patients. For chronic pancreatitis, its sensitivity was 60% and specificity 95%. For choledocholithiasis, the ultrasonic detection of duct dilatation or stones had a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 86%. Of the liver function tests, the alkaline phosphatase was more sensitive (67%) than the transaminases (44%) in indicating the presence of bile duct stones and had a high specificity (95%). None of the 10 patients with duct stones had normal ultrasound and normal alkaline phosphatase. Thus it was found that demonstration of a normal common bile duct by abdominal ultrasound and normal serum alkaline phosphatase together have 100% specificity in excluding bile duct stones. Using such knowledge over the two year period of this study would have spared 36 patients the need for ERCP.     

全腹部薄层冠状面单次激发快速自旋回波序列MRI检查诊断小儿胆管疾病的价值分析

目的 探讨全腹部薄层冠状面单次激发快速自旋回波序列MRI在小儿肝内外胆管成像中的应用。方法 2014年10月~2016年9月收治的26例胆道系统疾病患儿（胆道闭锁症8例,胆道扩张症患儿14例,胆囊结石2例,胆管结石2例）,所有患儿均采取全腹部薄层冠状面单次激发快速自旋回波序列扫描,其中9例患儿在延迟15~20 min后采取MRI增强扫描。观察所有患儿的肝内外胆道和各级分支的解剖全貌,分析其走行分布和通畅情况等。结果 胆道闭锁症患儿肝内胆道均能够正常显示,而其中胆囊形态细小并且未见到肝外胆道显影者2例,肝外胆道和胆囊无显影6例。4例患儿肝脾肿大,2例患儿肝门区有三角形长T₂信号影;在胆道扩张症患儿中有11例患儿出现胆总管梭形扩张,有1例患儿表现为Caroli病,有2例患儿出现肝门区囊性包块,有4例患儿出现有胆囊增大和肝内胆道扩张;在胆系结石患儿中有3例患儿表现为胆总管局部管腔信号不均匀、短T₂信号的充盈缺损,胆囊结石患者表现为胆囊颈部短T₂信号的充盈缺损;与相同层面的扫描图像相比,延迟增强MRI扫描显示出肝脏、胰腺实质信号都有所减低,与胆胰管内长T₂信号的组织对比度则有所增加,其胆道系统显示更为清晰。结论 相对于常规腹部MRI扫描而言,全腹部薄层冠状面单次激发快速自旋回波序列能够更加细致地观察患者胆道系统解剖结构,更为全面地了解患者病变全貌和是否存在其他脏器异常,临床应用具有很大的诊断意义。     

Gallstone disease: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and classification of biliary stones (common bile duct and intrahepatic)

Gallstones are common in Western countries and Japan. Most gallstones are found in the gallbladder, but they sometimes pass through the cystic duct into extrahepatic and/or intrahepatic bile ducts to become bile-duct stones, causing conditions known as choledocholithiasis and hepatolithiasis. Some 10-15% of gallstone patients concomitantly suffer from bile-duct stones. Bile-duct stones can also be formed in the absence of gallbladder stones, and such primary bile-duct stones are more common in East Asian countries than in the Western world. Thus pathogenesis of primary and secondary bile-duct stones is unlikely to be similar. Furthermore, the gallbladder stones are primarily cholesterol or black-pigment stones, whereas most bile-duct stones are brown-pigment stones (calcium bilirubin stones). Thus, epidemiology, pathogenesis and classification of biliary stones are very likely to differ according to stone location (intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic bile duct).     

Primary sclerosing cholangitis in which differential diagnosis from gallbladder carcinoma was difficult

We report a case of localized primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) which was difficult to distinguish from gallbladder carcinoma. A 75-year-old woman with elevated serum bilirubin was hospitalized and underwent endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD). There was no history of diseases such as gallbladder stone, pancreatitis, or ulcerative colitis. Cholangiography through the ENBD tube showed localized stenosis of the common bile duct; the gallbladder could not be seen. Angiography showed no encasement of the hepatic artery. Ultrasonography showed a tumor in the cystic duct, and the tumor had invaded the gallbladder and common bile duct. We diagnosed gallbladder carcinoma on radioimaging, and performed an S4aS5 subsegmentectomy of the liver and resection of the extrahepatic biliary tree. Pathologically, no malignant cells were detected, and fibrosis around bile ducts and infiltration of inflammatory cells into hepatic tissue were found. It is well known that PSC is sometimes difficult to differentially diagnose from cholangiocarcinoma. Our case is of high interest because ultrasonography showed findings suggestive of gallbladder carcinoma. It is therefore necessary to keep the possibility of PSC in mind for the diagnosis and treatment of such localized biliary stenosis.     

Gallbladder motility and lithogenicity of bile in patients with choledocholithiasis after endoscopic sphincterotomy

Background/Aims: Ablation of the sphincter of Oddi has been shown to inhibit gallstone formation in the prairie dog model, probably by allevaiting gallbladder bile stasis. The effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) on gallbladder emptying and lithogenicity of bile has not been studied adequately in humans. We, therefore, studied the changes in gallbladder emptying and lithogenicity of bile following ES in patients with choledocholithiasis and gallbladder in situ.Methods: Thirteen patients with choledocholithiasis with intact gallbladder underwent ES and common bile duct clearance. Eight patients had concomitant gallstones. Gallbladder emptying was studied by real time ultrasonography after stimulation by ceruletid infusion. Fasting gallbladder bile was collected during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography by placing a 7F or 8F catheter in the common bile duct and after ceruletid stimulation of gallbladder for bile microscopy and cholesterol nucleation time determination. Gallbladder emptying, nucleation time and bile microscopy were performed before ES and again between 4 and 8 weeks after ES after cholangiographic confirmation of clearance of common bile duct stones.Results: Fasting and residual gallbladder volumes decreased and ejection fraction increased significantly following ES, suggesting decreased stasis and improved emptying of gallbladder. Nucleation time was prolonged and cholesterol crystal index in bile decreased after ES, suggesting decreased lithogenicity. The decrease in gallbladder volumes and increase in ejection fraction after ES were observed in both groups of patients, with or without concomitant gallstones.Conclusions: ES decreases the stasis of gallbladder bile, improves gallbladder emptying and decreases the lithogenicity of bile in patients with gallstone disease as reflected by prolongation in nucleation time. ES may find a role as an adjunct to oral bile acid therapy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in addition to a prophylactic role of preventing gallstone formation in high risk groups.     

Clostridium perfringens bacteremia caused by choledocholithiasis in the absence of gallbladder stones

A 67-years-old male presented with periumbilical abdominal pain, fever and jaundice. His anaerobic blood culture was positive for clostridium perfringens. Computed tomogram scan of the abdomen and abdominal ultrasound showed normal gallbladder and common bile duct (CBD). Subsequently magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticogram showed choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticogramwith sphincterotomy and CBD stone extraction was performed. The patient progressively improved with antibiotic therapy Choledocholithiasis should be considered as a source of clostridium perfringens bacteremia especially in the setting of elevated liver enzymes with cholestatic pattern.     

Laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct lithiasis

With the advances of videolaparoscopic surgery, this approach had become the treatment of choice for cholelithiasis. However, about 5% to 10% may present common bile duct lithiasis. Most surgeons have still difficulties to deal with this situation and do prefer resolve with open surgery or with further endoscopic approach. We present a case of a 60-year-old man, with 18 months history of right upper quadrant pain, weight loss and jaundice. He was referred with diagnostic of pancreatic cancer. Laboratory investigation showed increased bilirubin (10 mg/dL), alkaline phosphatase and GGT. Abdominal ultrasound showed atrophic gallbladder with dilated intra and extrahepatic biliary tree. Computerized tomography scan disclosed enlarged biliary tree with 3 cm stone in the distal common bile duct. The patient underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy followed by choledochotomy and retrieval of the large stone. A latero-lateral choledochoduodenum anastomosis was then performed to decompress the biliary tree. The patient had an uneventful recovery being discharged at the 6th postoperative day. Laparoscopic management of choledocholithiasis is feasible in many patients, specially those with dilated biliary tree. The retrieval of stones may be followed by biliary drainage with T-tube. In some elderly patients with chronically dilated common bile duct, as in the present case, a choledochoduodenal anastomosis is the procedure of choice.     

Anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction without bile duct dilatation in gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction is a rare anomaly but is a risk factor for primary carcinoma of the gallbladder. To define the relationship between anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction, especially if it is not associated with common bile duct dilatation, and gallbladder carcinoma, we retrospectively reviewed data of 126 patients with gallbladder carcinoma. METHODOLOGY: All these patients had undergone direct cholangiography either by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. RESULTS: Among 126 patients with gallbladder cancer, 23 patients (18.3%) exhibited anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction. Patients with anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction were younger (mean age: 54 +/- 9.1 years) than patients without anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction (mean age: 65 +/- 9.7 years). The incidence of gallstones in patients with anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction (17%) was significantly lower than in those without this anomaly (64%) (P < 0.01). Among the 23 patients with anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction, 12 patients (52%) had no bile duct dilatation and, 11 patients (48%) had bile duct dilatation in the form of fusiform or cylindrical dilatation. However, no cases with severe cystic dilatation were found. Patients of anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction without common bile duct dilatation had more advanced disease and poor prognosis than those with common bile duct dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: The present study revealed that gallbladder cancer in the patients of anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction without common bile duct dilatation was diagnosed at advanced stage and the prognosis was very poor. Therefore, if a minor abnormality is detected in the wall of acalculous gallbladder on ultrasonography, direct cholangiography should be done to exclude this anomaly.     

Mirizzi Syndrome Type IV Successfully Treated with Peroral Single-operator Cholangioscopy-guided Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy: A Case Report with Literature Review

A 76-year-old man presented with liver dysfunction and intrahepatic bile duct dilatation. Imaging studies showed two large stones that had become impacted in the common hepatic duct, which was fused with the gallbladder. The patient was diagnosed with Mirizzi syndrome type IV. Hepaticojejunostomy and stone removal failed due to dense gallbladder adhesions involving the right hepatic artery. The bile flow was temporarily restored; however, the patient experienced cholangitis 16 months later. The stones were extracted via peroral single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC)-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy. This is the first case in which stones were completely removed by SOC-guided treatment in a patient with Mirizzi syndrome type IV.     

Echo-endoscopy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: the influence of the size of the stone and diameter of the common bile duct

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is highly accurate in diagnosing choledocholithiasis, but it is the most invasive of the available methods. Endoscopic ultrasonography is a very accurate test for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis with a risk of complications similar to that of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. AIM: To compare the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to analyze endoscopic ultrasound results according to stone size and common bile duct diameter. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and fifteen patients with symptomatic gallstones were admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Sixty-eight of them (31.7%) had a dilated common bile duct and/or hepatic biochemical parameter abnormalities. They were submitted to endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Sphincterotomy and sweeping of the common bile duct were performed if endoscopic ultrasonography or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography were considered positive for choledocholithiasis. After sphincterotomy and common bile duct clearance the largest stone was retrieved for measurement. Endoscopic or surgical explorations of the common bile duct were considered the gold-standard methods for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. RESULTS: All 68 patients were submitted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography with confirmation of the presence of gallstones. Endoscopic ultrasonography was a more sensitivity test than endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (97% vs. 67%) for the detection of choledocholithiasis. When stones >4.0 mm were analyzed, endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography presented similar results (96% vs. 90%). Neither the size of the stone nor the common bile duct diameter had influence on endoscopic ultrasonographic performance. CONCLUSIONS: For a group of patients with an intermediate or moderate risk with respect to the likelihood of having common bile duct stones, endoscopic ultrasonography is a better test for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis when compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography mainly for small-sized calculi.     

Predictors of unsuccessful mechanical lithotripsy and endoscopic clearance of large bile duct stones

BACKGROUND: Mechanical lithotripsy is used to break large bile duct stones. This study investigated the predictors of unsuccessful mechanical lithotripsy. METHODS: Consecutive patients with bile duct stones underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, sphincterotomy, and basket removal of stones. Mechanical lithotripsy was performed for stones of large size (>15 mm diameter) that precluded extraction intact. Success was defined as complete clearance of the duct. Various predictive factors, including size and number of stones, stone impaction, serum bilirubin, presence of cholangitis, and bile duct diameter were analyzed in relation to the success or failure of lithotripsy. RESULTS: A total of 669 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for suspected choledocholithiasis, which was found in 401 patients. Of the latter patients, 87 had large stones that required mechanical lithotripsy. Lithotripsy was successful in 69 (79%) patients. Impaction of the stone(s) in the bile duct was the only significant factor that predicted failure of lithotripsy and consequent failure of bile duct clearance. Other factors, including stone size, were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical lithotripsy is successful in about 79% of patients with large bile duct stones. The only significant factor that predicts failure of mechanical lithotripsy is stone impaction in the bile duct.     

Choledocholithiasis: Evaluation with MR Cholangiography

This retrospective study compared imaging results with surgery findings in 26 choledocholithiasis patients who were examined with two-dimensional fast spin-echo (2D-FSE) MR cholangiography and half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) MR cholangiography. Patients were examined using a 1, 5 T Philips Gyroscan ACS\11 MR scanner and a 1 T Siemens Harmony MR scanner. A total of 21 of the 26 patients with diagnosed choledocholithiasis on imaging were proven to have common bile ducts stones. Two patients had another small stone which was impacted into the Vater and which was not detected with MR cholangiography. One patient with mild dilated common bile duct and pancreatic duct also had a small impacted stone which was not detected by MR cholangiography. One patient had an irregular stone in the hepatic duct, extending partially into the left hepatic duct which was misintepretated as carcinoma. The last patient had a dilated common bile duct due to a small impacted stone which was not detected and biliary sludge which was misintepretated as a stone. The overall sensitivity of MR cholangiography in the detection of common bile duct stones was 80.8%. In conclusion MR cholangiography can rapidly evaluate the common bile duct for stones. The only problem we encountered was in the evaluation of small impacted stones at the Vater. (Dig Endosc 1999; 11: 220–224)     

An alternative surgical approach to a difficult case of Mirizzi syndrome： A case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION Mirizzi syndrome (MS) is a rare complication of long- standing cholelithiasis, which results from impaction of a large calculus or multiple small stones in the cystic duct or in the neck of the gallbladder causing extrinsic narrowing of the c…     

Usefulness of Intraductal Ultrasonography in Icteric Patients with Highly Suspected Choledocholithiasis Showing Normal Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Background

Choledocholithiasis is one of the causes of jaundice and may require urgent treatment. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been the primary management strategy for choledocholithiasis. However, small stones can be overlooked during ERCP.

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) for detecting choledocholithiasis in icteric patients with highly suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones without definite stone diagnosis on ERCP.

Methods

Ninety-five icteric (bilirubin ≥3 mg/dL) patients who underwent ERCP for highly suspected choledocholithiasis without definite filling defects on cholangiography were prospectively enrolled in the present study. We evaluated the bile duct using IDUS for the presence of stones or sludge. Reference standard for choledocholithiasis was endoscopic extraction of stone or sludge.

Result

Bile duct stones were detected with IDUS in 31 of 95 patients (32.6 %). IDUS findings were confirmed by endoscopic stone extraction in all patients. The mean diameter of CBD stones detected by IDUS was 2.9 mm (range 1–7 mm). IDUS revealed biliary sludge in 24 patients (25.2 %) which was confirmed by sludge extraction in 21 patients (87.5 %). In dilated CBD, detection rate of bile duct stone/sludge based on IDUS was significantly higher than in non-dilated CBD (p = 0.004).

Conclusion

IDUS is useful for the detection of occult CBD stone on ERCP in icteric patients with highly suspected CBD stones.