Relationship of portal pressure, anorectal varices and hemorrhoids in cirrhotic patients.

In a prospective study of 103 consecutive cirrhotic patients a high prevalence (43%) of anorectal varices was found compared with only 2% in 103 age- and sex-matched control subjects (p less than 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the prevalences of hemorrhoids in cirrhotic patients and in control subjects (79% vs. 83%, p greater than 0.05). The hepatic venous pressure gradient of cirrhotic patients with anorectal varices was similar to cirrhotic patients without anorectal varices (14 +/- 6 mmHg, n = 22, vs. 16 +/- 7 mmHg, n = 39, p greater than 0.05. There was no significant difference in the hepatic venous pressure gradient between cirrhotic patients with and without hemorrhoids (15 +/- 6 mmHg, n = 47, vs. 16 +/- 8 mmHg, n = 14, p greater than 0.05). The prevalence of anorectal varices and hemorrhoids in cirrhotic patients had no relation to Child-Pugh's grading, esophageal varices with and without sclerotherapy and ascites. We conclude that anorectal varices are common in cirrhotic patients. Anorectal varices and hemorrhoids are not related to the degree of portal pressure.     

Snake skin pattern gastropathy in cirrhotic patients

Gastric mucosal lesions are common in patients with cirrhosis. Among them, snake skin pattern gastropathy (SSPG) is the most distinguishing one. A prospective study was conducted to investigate the incidence of SSPG in cirrhotic patients, the relationship between the degree of portal pressure and SSPG, and the possible association of SSPG with serum levels of gastrin and pepsinogen I. SSPG was found to be significantly more common in 100 cirrhotic patients than in 100 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (41% vs 0%, P less than 0.0001). Hepatic venous pressure gradient and serum gastrin and pepsinogen I levels were measured in 21 cirrhotic patients with SSPG and 25 cirrhotics without SSPG. There was no significant difference in hepatic venous pressure gradient (16.1 +/- 4.4 mmHg vs 16.1 +/- 4.9 mmHg, P greater than 0.05), serum gastrin level (78.0 +/- 26.7 pg/mL vs 80.1 +/- 32.5 pg/mL, P greater than 0.05) and serum pepsinogen I level (69.5 +/- 26.6 ng/mL vs 65.2 +/- 26.1 ng/mL, P greater than 0.05) in cirrhotic patients with or without SSPG. In conclusion, SSPG is common in cirrhotic patients. Portal pressure per se may not be the only factor causing SSPG--other aggressive factors may be needed together to cause the gastropathy. There is no evidence of correlation between serum gastrin or pepsinogen I level and SSPG.     

Hepatic venous pressure gradient determination in patients with hepatitis C virus-related and alcoholic cirrhosis

OBJECTIVES: Few data exist regarding the degree of portal hypertension in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis, as the majority of studies have included mainly patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. This study was aimed at comparing the severity of portal hypertension in patients with HCV-related or alcoholic cirrhosis. METHODS: In total, 59 cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension (HCV-related in 34 cases and alcoholic in 25) underwent main right hepatic vein catheterization, with determination of the wedged and free hepatic venous pressures, and of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). RESULTS: HVPG values did not differ between the two groups of patients (19.4 +/- 6.0 mmHg vs 18.5 +/- 3.5 mmHg; P = 0.51). The prevalence and degree of oesophageal and gastric varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy did not correlate with the aetiology. Patients with viral cirrhosis had a lower prevalence of previous bleeding than those with alcoholic cirrhosis, despite a similar proportion of large varices in the two groups and similar HVPG levels. In both groups of patients, HVPG did not differ between patients with previous bleeds and those without. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients does not correlate with the cause of the disease. Thus, current statements on the management of portal hypertension, although based upon studies including mainly patients with alcoholic cirrhosis, can be applied also to patients with viral-related cirrhosis.     

Pharmacological therapy of portal hypertension--focused on Korean data]

Portal hypertension as a consequence of liver cirrhosis is responsible for serious complications such as variceal bleeding, ascites and hepatic encephalopathy. Successful pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension can prevent the risk of the variceal bleeding, and contribute to reduce the morbidity and mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. To identify the effect of drugs on portal hypertension, portal pressure was evaluated accurately before and after the drug administration. The hepatic venous pressure gradient has been accepted as the gold-standard method for assessing the severity of portal hypertension and the response to drug treatment. The mean hepatic venous pressure gradient was 15.1+/-5.4 mmHg in Korean cirrhotic patients who had experienced variceal bleeding. Non-selective beta blockers are the treatment of choice for primary and secondary prevention of variceal bleeding. The dose of propranolol should be subsequently adjusted until the resting heart rate had been reduced by 25% or less than 55 beats per minute. It has been reported that the optimal dose of propranolol is variable due to racial differences in cardiovascular receptor sensitivity. In Korean patients with portal hypertension and liver cirrhosis, the mean required dose of propranolol to reach target heart rate was 165 mg (range; 80-280 mg). This review covers mainly the results of the pharmacological therapy of portal hypertension in Korean cirrhotic patients.     

Comparison between portal vein pressure and wedged hepatic vein pressure in hepatitis B-related cirrhosis

Portal vein pressure and wedged hepatic vein pressure were measured simultaneously in 21 patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis of the liver and were compared to pressure measured in six patients with idiopathic portal hypertension. No significant difference in the portal venous pressure gradient was found between patients with cirrhosis and those with idiopathic portal hypertension (17.3 +/- 4.3 mmHg (mean +/- S.D.) vs. 19.7 +/- 3.1 mmHg, P greater than 0.05). However, the difference between the portal and the hepatic venous pressure gradient was significantly smaller in patients with cirrhosis than in idiopathic portal hypertension patients (1.3 +/- 1.7 vs. 10.8 +/- 2.1 mmHg, P less than 0.001). An excellent correlation was found between portal vein pressure and wedged hepatic vein pressure in hepatitis B-related cirrhosis (r = 0.94, P less than 0.001). There was no linear relationship between the portal venous pressure gradient and varix size or bleeding episodes. We concluded that a close agreement existed between portal vein pressure and wedged hepatic vein pressure in hepatitis B-related liver cirrhosis. Therefore, measurement of wedged hepatic vein pressure reliably reflects portal vein pressure in these patients.     

Portal hypertension and portal hypertensive gastropathy in patients with liver cirrhosis: a haemodynamic study

BACKGROUND/AIM: The relationships between the levels of portal hypertension and the morphologic alterations of gastric mucosa in patients with liver cirrhosis--generally described as portal hypertensive gastropathy--are poorly defined. PATIENTS: In total, 62 patients with cirrhosis of different aetiologies, were examined by endoscopy and measurement of portal hypertension by hepatic venous pressure gradient. RESULTS: Portal hypertensive gastropathy was observed in 49 cases; six patients showed gastric antral vascular ectasia always associated with gastric lesions described as severe portal hypertensive gastropathy with different localizations. Hepatic venous pressure gradient showed severe portal hypertension in 37 cases, and averaged 17.7 +/- 4.3 mmHg. It was much higher in patients with severe lesions (p=0.0004). Hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with endoscopic signs of isolated antral gastropathy was lower (p=0.04) than in those with isolated lesions in body-fundus. No relationship was found between hepatic function, as assessed by the Child-Pugh score, and portal hypertensive gastropathy. CONCLUSIONS: The present data suggest that the severity of portal hypertensive gastropathy is related to portal hypertension, but portal hypertension is not the sole determinant of the occurrence of endoscopic abnormalities of gastric mucosa. The derangement of liver function does not appear to play any role in the occurrence of portal hypertensive gastropathy.     

Combined liver vein and spleen pulp pressure measurements in patients with portal or splenic vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND: Patients with thrombosis of the portal or splenic vein may develop portal hypertension with bleeding from oesophageal or gastric varices. The relevant portal pressure cannot be measured by liver vein catheterization or transhepatic puncture of the portal vein because the obstruction is peripheral to the accessible part of the portal system. METHODS: Liver vein catheterization was combined with percutaneous splenic pressure measurement in 10 patients with portal or splenic vein thrombosis and no cirrhosis, and 10 cirrhotic patients without thrombosis. The splenic pressure was measured by percutaneous puncture below the curvature of the ribs with an angle of the needle to skin of 30 degrees in order to minimize the risk of cutting the spleen if the patient took a deep breath. RESULTS: None of the patients in whom the described procedure was followed had complications. Pressure measurements in the spleen pulp and splenic vein were concordant. The pressure gradient across the portal venous system (splenic-to-wedged hepatic vein pressure) was -1.3 to 8.5 mmHg (median, 2.8 mmHg) in cirrhosis patients and 0-44 mmHg (median, 18 mmHg) in thrombosis patients, the variation reflecting various degrees of obstruction to flow in the portal venous system. Peripheral portal pressure (splenic-to-free liver vein pressure gradient) was 1.1-28 mmHg (median, 17 mmHg) in cirrhotic patients and 11-52 mmHg (median, 23 mmHg) in thrombosis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Liver vein catheterization combined with percutaneous splenic pressure measurement is feasible in quantifying pressure gradient across a thrombosis of the portal/splenic vein and in quantifying portal pressure peripheral to this kind of thrombosis.     

丹参等活血化淤中药对门脉高压血流动力学影响的临床与实验研究

目的探讨丹参、当归等及硝苯啶对门脉高压血流动力学的影响。方法采用血管插管测定胆管结扎肝硬化犬门脉系统压力变化；超声多普勒观测肝硬化患者门脉血流动力学变化。结果（１）静脉滴注丹参、当归后，肝硬化犬门静脉压（Ｐｐｖ）、嵌塞肝静脉压（ＷＨＶＰ）、肝静脉压力梯度（ＨＶＰＧ）显著降低（Ｐ＜０．０５～０．０１），平均动脉压（ＭＡＰ）、心率（ＨＲ）无明显变化（Ｐ＞０．０５），硝苯啶则使Ｐｐｖ，ＷＨＶＰ，ＭＡＰ．ＨＲ显著降低（Ｐ＜０．０５）。（２）丹参、丹参＋硝苯啶．丹参＋水＋硝苯啶口服药１０－１２周，能显著降低肝硬化患者门静脉内径（Ｄｐｖ）、脾静脉内径（Ｄｓｖ）．门静脉血流量（Ｑｐｖ），脾静脉血流量（Ｑｓｖ）（Ｐ＜０．０５－０．０１，当归作用较弱。结论对比表明，丹参、当归等中药较硝苯啶对门脉压力作用为慢，但较持久，无副反应。     

Prevalence of portal hypertensive duodenopathy in cirrhosis: clinical and haemodynamic features

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of portal hypertensive duodenopathy (PHD) in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, and to evaluate its relationship with clinical and haemodynamic parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Endoscopy reports and clinical history of 549 consecutive patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension were evaluated retrospectively. A diagnosis of PHD was obtained in those patients with a congestive vascular pattern of the duodenum. RESULTS: PHD was found in 46 patients (8.4%). Previous endoscopic band ligation and coexistence of severe gastropathy were significantly more frequent in PHD group. Systemic and hepatic haemodynamic evaluations were performed in 20 patients with PHD and 160 without PHD: the mean hepatic venous pressure gradient was higher in those cases with PHD (22.5 (5.4) vs. 19.8 (5.5) mmHg, P=0.045). Hypertensive colopathy was found in seven out of the 10 patients with PHD and a colonoscopic evaluation. In five of six patients PHD disappeared after liver transplant. CONCLUSIONS: PHD is an uncommon finding of portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients. It is associated with previous endoscopic band ligation, to manifestations of portal hypertension in other sites of the gastrointestinal tract and to greater values of hepatic venous pressure gradient. The clinical relevance of this syndrome remains to be determined.     

Invasive diagnosis of portal hypertension in cirrhosis: a critical evaluation of the hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement

Portal hypertension is defined by an increased pressure gradient between the portal vein and the inferior vena cava (N < 5 mmHg). The most commonly used technique to assess the severity of portal hypertension is the catheterization of one hepatic vein with measurement of pressures in a free position and in a wedged position using preferably a balloon catheter. The hepatic venous pressure gradient is calculated by the difference between both pressures. In most cirrhotic processes, venous pressure gradient gives a good evaluation of portal hypertension however, portal vein pressure can be higher than wedged hepatic venous pressure, particularly in presence of an increased pre-sinusoidal resistance. In such cases, a direct access to portal vein might be needed to assess the severity of portal hypertension. For an accurate interpretation of the hepatic venous pressure gradient, several strict criteria must be followed; otherwise the validity of measurements might be seriously questioned. Hepatic venous pressure gradient has been used as a prognostic marker of portal hypertension, particularly for the occurrence of bleeding from gastrophageal varices which almost never occur below a threshold value of 12 mmHg. However, the prognostic value of the hepatic venous pressure gradient for survival is still a controversial matter On the other hand, the use of hepatic venous pressure gradient has been proposed to monitor the pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension and it is generally accepted that reaching a same threshold value of 12 mmHg should almost completely abolish the risk of first or recurrent variceal bleeding. A large number of studies have also reported that a 20% hepatic venous pressure gradient decrease should be considered as a significant response to therapy, the risk of the first or recurrent bleeding being significantly reduced in responders. But again there are conflicting results.     

Underlying mechanism of portal hypertensive gastropathy in cirrhosis: A hemodynamic and morphological approach

Background and Aim:  Portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) is an important cause of bleeding in patients with cirrhosis associated with portal hypertension. Histologically, the condition is characterized by dilation of the mucosal and submucosal vessels of the stomach; however, its mechanisms remain unclear. The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to evaluate the role of portal and systemic hemodynamic features, humoral factors and hepatocellular function in the development and severity of PHG in patients with cirrhosis.
Methods:  Forty-six patients with cirrhosis of different etiologies underwent endoscopy. Portal hypertension was evaluated by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). The gastric mucosa was analyzed using two diagnostic methods: endoscopy according to the McCormack criteria and histological by histomorphometric analysis.
Results:  The prevalence of PHG according to the endoscopic and histomorphometric methods was 93.4% and 76.1%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in HVPG measurements between the patients with mild (16.0 ± 5.9 mmHg) and severe PHG (16.9 ± 6.5 mmHg; P  = 0.80) or between patients who did not have (15.2 ± 8.0 mmHg) and those who had PHG (16.3 ± 5.7 mmHg). No correlation was found between the presence or severity of PHG and systemic vascular resistance index ( P  = 0.53 and 0.34, respectively), Child–Pugh classification ( P  = 0.73 and 0.78, respectively) or glucagon levels ( P  = 0.59 and 0.62, respectively).
Conclusions:  The present data show no correlation between the presence or the severity of PHG and portal pressure, Child–Pugh classification or systemic hemodynamics, suggesting that other factors may be involved in the physiopathology of PHG, such as local gastric mucosal factors or other underlying factors.     

The portal pressure response to beta-blockade is greater in cirrhotic patients without varices than in those with varices

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nonselective beta-blockers are effective in reducing portal pressure in cirrhotic patients. However, this beneficial effect is highly variable and may depend on the extent of portal system collateralization. The aim of this study was to compare portal pressure response with timolol, a nonselective beta-blocker, in cirrhotic patients with and without varices. METHODS: Portal and systemic hemodynamics were measured before and after a single oral dose of 10 mg of timolol in 50 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, 15 with and 35 without esophageal varices. RESULTS: Timolol significantly decreased portal pressure in all patients (mean reduction, 20% +/- 13%; P < 0.0001). The reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient was greater in patients without varices (-24% +/- 14%) than in those with varices (-12% +/- 8%) (P < 0.01). A decrease in the hepatic venous pressure gradient of <12 mm Hg was achieved in 7 of 12 (58%) patients without varices and a baseline pressure gradient of <12 mm Hg, but only in 3 of 15 patients with varices (20%) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Timolol is effective in reducing portal pressure in cirrhotic patients, more so in patients without varices, suggesting that nonselective beta-blockers will be more effective in the treatment of portal hypertension when administered at early stages, before the development of varices. (Gastroenterology 1997 Jun;112(6):2012-6)     

Portal hypertensive colopathy is associated with portal hypertension severity in cirrhotic patients

AIM： To assess the prevalence of portal hypertension （PH） related colorectal lesions in liver transplant candidates, and to evaluate its association with the severity of PH. METHODS： Between October 2004 and December 2005, colonoscopy was performed in 92 cirrhotic liver transplant candidates. We described the lesions resulting from colorectal PH and their association with the grade of PH in 77 patients who underwent measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient （HVPG）. RESULTS： Mean age was 55 years and 80.7% of patients were men. The main etiology of cirrhosis wasalcoholism （45.5%）. Portal hypertensive colopathy （PHC） was found in 23.9%, colonic varices in 7.6% and polyps in 38% of patients （adenomatous type 65.2%）. One asymptomatic patient had a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. The manifestations of colorectal PH were not associated with the etiology of liver disease or with the Child-Pugh grade. Ninety percent of patients with colopathy presented with gastroesophageal varices （GEV）, and 27.5% of patients with GEV presented with colopathy （P = 0.12）. A relationship between higher values of HVPG and presence of colopathy was observed （19.9：1：6.2 mmHg vs 16.8 ± 5.4 mmHg, P = 0.045）, but not with the grade of colopathy （P = 0.13）. Preneoplastic polyps and neoplasm （P = 0.02） and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis （P = 0.006） were more prevalent in patients with colopathy. We did not observe any association between previous β-blocker therapy and the presence of colorectal portal hypertensive vasculopathy. CONCLUSION： PHC is common in cirrhotic liver transplant candidates and is associated with higher portal pressure.     

Combined Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Prospective Study in Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Cirrhosis

Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage is one of the more important complications of cirrhosis. Most of the available data regarding the prevalence of upper and lower gastrointestinal sites of bleeding in cirrhotic patients have been obtained in individuals with alcoholic cirrhosis evaluated in the course of an acute gastrointestinal bleeding episode. Few data exist, however, as to the prevalence of either potential bleeding sites or of normal endoscopic findings in hemodynamically stable individuals with cirrhosis of any etiology. Five hundred ten cirrhotic subjects, who were evaluated for possible liver transplantation (OLTx) between January 1985 and June 1987, were included in this study. Seventy-five had alcoholic cirrhosis and 435 had nonalcoholic cirrhosis of various etiologies. Of these 510 patients, 412 underwent combined upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and 98 underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy alone. Gastritis, gastric and duodenal ulcer disease were found significantly (each at least p less than 0.025) more often in patients with alcoholic liver disease than in those with nonalcoholic liver disease. The prevalence of the various lower gastrointestinal lesions in both groups was similar. Of particular interest is the fact that in alcoholic cirrhotics, the prevalence of gastritis, gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer disease was unrelated to the degree of portal hypertension, whereas in the nonalcoholic cirrhotics the prevalence of gastritis and duodenal ulcer disease but not gastric ulcer disease was associated significantly with the degree of portal hypertension as assessed by the presence or absence of large esophageal varices, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy.     

Hemodynamic effects of nifedipine on hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with portal hypertension

The effect of Nifedipine on hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was determined in 10 patients with portal hypertension due to cirrhosis of the liver, and in 7 control subjects, by hepatic vein catheterization. Twenty min. after sublingual application of 10 mg Nifedipine, patients and controls showed significant hemodynamic changes in the systemic circulation. In contrast, HVPG after Nifedipine was not statistically different from the basal values--neither in patients with portal hypertension (p = 16.6 +/- 5.2 mmHg vs 17.9 +/- 5.3 mmHg) nor in the control subjects (p = 2.9 +/- 1.1 mmHg vs. 1.0 mmHg). We conclude that calcium entry blockade by Nifedipine is not effective in acutely reducing portal venous pressure.     

Role of chronic Helicobacter pylori infection in hyperdynamic circulation of cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hyperdynamic circulation observed in portal hypertension is characterized by generalized vasodilatation, increased cardiac index, and increased systemic and regional blood flows, and mediated at least partly by increased nitric oxide activities. Recent studies have demonstrated that Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection can stimulate nitric oxide synthase expression and activities. This study investigated if chronic H. pylori infection might be involved in the development of hyperdynamic circulation in cirrhotic patients. METHODOLOGY: Fifty-eight patients with cirrhosis and thirty-six healthy subjects entered this study. The serologic evidence of H. pylori infection was determined with ELISA in both groups. In addition, in cirrhotic patients hemodynamic studies were performed by Swan-Ganz catheterization and thermodilution technique. RESULTS: No significant differences in age (65.5 +/- 0.8 vs. 63.7 +/- 1.1 years), sex (male/female: 43/15 vs. 29/7) and seroprevalence of H. pylori (74.1% vs. 80.6%) were observed between cirrhotic patients and healthy subjects (P > 0.05). The seropositive rate of H. pylori in patients with cirrhosis was not associated with severity of cirrhosis and size of esophageal varices (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in systemic vascular resistance and hepatic venous pressure gradient between cirrhotic patients with and those without chronic H. pylori infection (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The seroprevalence of H. pylori in cirrhotic patients is similar to that of healthy controls, and not related to the severity of cirrhosis and degree of portal hypertension. Chronic H. pylori infection does not play a major role in the hyperdynamic circulation observed in cirrhotic patients.     

Portal hypertension in primary biliary cirrhosis: Relationship with histological features

The prevalence and type of portal hypertension (PH) in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and their relationship with liver lesions have been investigated in 32 patients with the disease. Portal hypertension was considered when oesophageal or gastric varices were observed by endoscopy and/or when hepatic venous pressure gradient measured by hepatic vein catheterization was greater than 6 mmHg. Within 3 days of endoscopy, a liver biopsy was performed for histological staging and semiquantitative grading (0 to 3+) of portal and sinusoidal fibrosis, portal inflammation, piecemeal necrosis, lobular necrosis, cholestasis, as well as the presence of granulomas and Mallory's hyaline. Twenty patients (62.5%) had portal hypertension, five of them showing presinusoidal PH (15.5%) and the remaining 15 (47%) with sinusoidal component. The four patients in stage IV had sinusoidal PH and the only patient in stage I had no PH. The prevalence of portal hypertension was similar in patients in stage II (57%) and stage III (55%), but presinusoidal PH was only observed in patients in stage II. Patients with PH showed significantly higher portal inflammation and piecemeal necrosis than patients without PH. By contrast, there were no differences in portal and sinusoidal fibrosis, nor in the other histologic features. These results indicate that portal hypertension is common in PBC and it may be present in the early stages of the disease. The fact that presinusoidal PH was only observed in patients in stage II suggests that portal hypertension is initially of presinusoidal type, and then as the disease progresses is joined by a sinusoidal component.     

肝静脉压梯度对食管曲张静脉出血的预测价值

目的探讨肝静脉压梯度(HVPG)对预测肝硬化食管曲张静脉出血(EVB)的临床价值。方法对26例有出血史和20例无出血史的肝硬化食管静脉曲张患者进行了HVPG测量,平均随访18个月观察HVPG值与EVB发生率之相关性。结果出血组HVPG值平均为15.13±3.57mmHg,明显高于非出血组11.07±2.21mmHg,两组相比差异显著(P<0.05);HVPG值>12mmHg者EVB或EVB再发率为73％,而HVPG值<12mmHg者EVB发生率为10％(P<0.01)。结论HVPG测定有预测首次EVB或EVB再发的价值。     

Increased blood flow through the portal system in cirrhotic rats

Portal venous pressure is the result of the interplay between portal venous blood flow and the vascular resistance offered to that flow. Whether portal hypertension is maintained only by an increased portal venous resistance or also by an increased blood flow within the portal venous system is still open to speculation. To resolve these differences, splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics were evaluated in cirrhotic rats, induced by CCl4. Blood flow and portal-systemic shunting were measured by radioactive microsphere techniques. All cirrhotic rats had portal hypertension (portal venous pressure 13.5 +/- 1.1 vs. 9.0 +/- 0.5 mmHg, in normal control rats; p less than 0.01), but portal-systemic shunting in cirrhosis (31% +/- 13% vs. 0.2% +/- 0.02%; p less than 0.05) was variable, ranging from 1% to 97%. Portal venous inflow, the total blood flow within the portal system, was increased in cirrhotic rats (5.75 +/- 0.04 vs. 4.52 +/- 0.36 ml/min per 100 g; p less than 0.05). Total splanchnic arterial resistance was reduced in cirrhotic rats (3.3 +/- 0.2 vs. 5.8 +/- 0.5 dyn X s X cm-5 X 10(5); p less than 0.01). Portal venous resistance, however, was not abnormally elevated in cirrhotic rats (4.6 +/- 0.5 vs. 4.7 +/- 0.5 dyn X s X cm-5 X 10(4), p = NS). Splanchnic hemodynamics in cirrhotic rats demonstrate that portal hypertension is maintained, at least in part, by a hyperdynamic portal venous inflow. The hemodynamic data in cirrhotic rats provided evidence that supports the role of an increased portal blood flow in portal hypertension and gives a quantitative definition of splanchnic hemodynamics in intrahepatic portal hypertension.     

Role of hepatic hemodynamic study in the evaluation of patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the levels of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) in a population of cirrhotic patients, checking if the 12 mmHg level discriminates those who bleed by rupture of gastroesophageal varices and assessing the prognostic role of hepatic venous pressure gradient in the progress of these patients. METHODOLOGY: Eighty-three cirrhotic patients (mean age 52.9 +/- 10.1 years) were studied, 71.1% of whom were males. All patients performed a hepatic hemodynamic study to determine the hepatic venous pressure gradient. Patients were followed 16.6 +/- 16.02 months on average. RESULTS: Mean hepatic venous pressure gradient was 15.26 +/- 6.46 mmHg. The risk of bleeding was 50% for patients with hepatic venous pressure gradient below 12 mmHg and 76% (rr = 1.52, p = 0.045) for those with hepatic venous pressure gradient above 12 mmHg. When patients were grouped according to outcome (death, shunt surgery, transplantation, or rebleeding), the mean hepatic venous pressure gradient (16.65 +/- 6.71) was found to be significantly higher in these patients than in living patients without rebleeding (12.75 +/- 4.96), p = 0.014. However, the cutoff point of 16 mmHg failed to discriminate those patients with a worse prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic venous pressure gradient determination can be used to identify those individuals with a higher risk of bleeding due to rupture of gastroesophageal varices, as well as those with a more reserved prognosis, even though the discriminative critical levels used suggest that its clinical usefulness is relative.