共查询到16条相似文献,搜索用时 359 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Somashekhar SP Ramya Y Rohit Kumar C Shabber SZ Vijay A Amit R Poonam P Arun KN Ashwin KR 《中国肿瘤临床》2022,49(24):1268-1272
7.
Pompiliu Piso 《中国肿瘤临床》2022,49(24):1299-1302
本文系统介绍了德国胃癌腹膜转移治疗和预防方面的临床试验结果和治疗经验。肿瘤细胞减灭术(cytoreductive surgery,CRS)联合腹腔热灌注化疗(hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy,HIPEC)和(或)胃切除术可以在有潜在治愈性的情况下实施,但仅能在经验丰富的中心并根据多学科诊疗团队的临床决策开展。目前,德国正在进行有关CRS+HIPEC治疗胃癌腹膜转移的有效性和安全性的高质量临床试验,也进行着有关胃癌切除术后辅助HIPEC治疗的临床试验。德国发明的加压腹腔气溶胶化疗(pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy,PIPAC)技术联合系统性化疗可作为姑息性治疗手段处理及预防腹水等并发症,期待有更多临床研究结果证实其有效性。 相似文献
8.
Pompiliu Piso 《中国肿瘤临床》2022,49(24):1299-1302
本文系统介绍了德国胃癌腹膜转移治疗和预防方面的临床试验结果和治疗经验。肿瘤细胞减灭术(cytoreductive surgery,CRS)联合腹腔热灌注化疗(hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy,HIPEC)和(或)胃切除术可以在有潜在治愈性的情况下实施,但仅能在经验丰富的中心并根据多学科诊疗团队的临床决策开展。目前,德国正在进行有关CRS+HIPEC治疗胃癌腹膜转移的有效性和安全性的高质量临床试验,也进行着有关胃癌切除术后辅助HIPEC治疗的临床试验。德国发明的加压腹腔气溶胶化疗(pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy,PIPAC)技术联合系统性化疗可作为姑息性治疗手段处理及预防腹水等并发症,期待有更多临床研究结果证实其有效性。 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
Pingan Ding Peigang Yang Yuan Tian Honghai Guo Yang Liu Ze Zhang Tao Zheng Bibo Tan Zhidong Zhang Dong Wang Yong Li Qun Zhao 《Journal of gastrointestinal oncology.》2021,12(4):1416
BackgroundTo explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic (NIPS) paclitaxel chemotherapy combined with apatinib and S-1 in the treatment of gastric cancer patients with positive exfoliative cytology.MethodsPatients with gastric cancer (P0CY1) who were confirmed to have free cancer cells (FCCs) in the abdominal cavity after laparoscopic exploration from April 2018 to August 2019 were enrolled. All patients underwent NIPS chemotherapy using paclitaxel combined with apatinib and S-1 treatment. Laparoscopic exploration was performed after 3 cycles of conversion therapy. The primary study endpoint was the FCC negative rate, and the secondary study endpoints were overall survival time (OS), progression-free survival time (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety indicators.ResultsOut of 312 advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic exploration, 36 patients with P0CY1 gastric cancer were identified and enrolled in this study. After 3 cycles of conversion therapy, the ORR was 80.56% and the DCR was 94.44%. All patients underwent secondary laparoscopic exploration, and the FCC conversion rate was 77.78%. All patients with negative FCC underwent R0 surgical resection, with a median follow-up time of 11.4 months. The median survival time was 15.5 months, and the 1-year OS was 80.55%. The median PFS was 14.4 months, and the 1-year PFS was 75.00%. Treatment-related grade 3 adverse reactions were mainly leukopenia and neutropenia. No grade 4 adverse reactions were observed. There were no reported deaths related to chemotherapy or surgery in the study cohort.ConclusionsNIPS with paclitaxel combined with apatinib and S-1 treatment may increase the FCC negative rate of P0CY1 gastric cancer patients. 相似文献
12.
13.
14.
目的:评估VCD/IE方案(长春新碱+环磷酰胺+多柔比星与异环磷酰胺+依托泊苷交替)联合阿帕替尼治疗化疗失败进展期尤因肉瘤的疗效与安全性。方法:回顾性研究2017年1月至2021年12月于华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院,接受VCD/IE方案联合阿帕替尼治疗化疗失败的进展期尤因肉瘤11例患者的临床资料。与同期接受阿帕替尼单药治疗的尤因肉瘤患者对比,评估该方案的疗效及安全性。主要观察终点为疾病无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS),次要观察终点为客观缓解率(objective response rate,ORR)、疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)、总生存时间(overall survival,OS)和不良反应(adverse event,AE)。结果:共筛选出符合入排标准的联合治疗患者11例,阿帕替尼单药组10例。两组患者中位随访时间分别为19.5个月和14.5个月。其中男性占比分别为72.7%(8/11)和70%(7/10),平均年龄分别为18.1±6.7岁和20.8±15.7岁。VCD/IE方案联合阿帕替尼的ORR、... 相似文献
15.
目的:探讨腹腔热灌注化疗(hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemtheropy,HIPEC)治疗胆囊癌伴腹膜转移患者的临床疗效研究。方法:本文回顾性分析海军军医大学东方肝胆外科医院2015年1月至2018年1月收治的84例胆囊癌合并腹膜转移患者,31例患者给予HIPEC联合细胞减灭术(cytoreductive surgery,CRS)+术后1个月全身化疗为研究组,53例给予细胞减灭术+术后1个月全身化疗为对照组,观察比较两组临床疗效及不良反应发生情况。结果:研究组中位生存时间为(21.72±2.96)个月,显著长于对照组的(14.93±2.09)个月(P<0.05)。研究组白细胞减少、血红蛋白减少、血小板减少、胃肠道反应、肝功能损伤和肾功能损伤较对照组无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:HIPEC治疗进展期胆囊癌临床疗效显著,可延长患者生存时间,不良反应较小,值得推广应用。 相似文献
16.
Introduction: Gastric cancer is the fourth/fifth most common malignancy worldwide, with only a quarter of patients achieving a 5-year survival rate. It has been estimated that 15–50% or more of patients have peritoneal disease upon surgical exploration. Until the early 1990s, peritoneal metastasis was considered as terminal stage of the disease; in the late 1990s, selected patients with peritoneal metastasis were recategorized as local disease. Over the past two decades, the treatment of peritoneal involvement has transformed, and cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal therapy have drastically altered the natural course of several malignancies.Areas covered: We performed a review of studies available on PubMed from 1 January 2014 to 31 July 2019 and the analysis of their reference citations. We describe the most current intraperitoneal chemotherapy opportunities in the treatment of gastric cancer: hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (LHIPEC), neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy (NIPS), LHIPEC + NIPS, extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL), early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC), and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC).Expert opinion: Comprehensive treatment consisting of CRS combined with perioperative intraperitoneal/systemic chemotherapy can, today, be considered an effective strategy to improve the long-term survival of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis. 相似文献