Long-Term Antitachycardia Pacing Experience for Supraventricular Tachycardia

A pacemaker was used to control drug-resistant reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in 40 patients. An antitachycardia pacemaker was implanted in 37 for SVT; in one for ventricular tachycardia that could also be used to terminate SVT; in one SVT could be terminated with an activity rate variable pacemaker; and in one a DDD pacemaker was used for prevention and termination of SVT. Twenty patients had AV nodal reentrant tachycardias, eight had tachycardias due to a concealed accessory pathway, eight had a Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, three had reentrant atrial tachycardias, and one had atrial flutter. Twenty-two patients were paced from the right atrium, five from the coronary sinus, ten from the right ventricle, and three had a DDD pacemaker. During a total follow-up period of 1,503 (mean 38) months an estimated 16,240 episodes of tachycardia were terminated promptly at home, 58 required several attempts, 57 episodes lasted longer than 30 minutes but did not require medical attention, and 11 required hospital admission. Hospital admission for SVT decreased from one per patient-month (in the 3 months before implantation) to 1 per 137 patient-months after implantation. Additional reentrant tachycardias occurred in 13 patients. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in combination with a conservative antitachycardia pacing mode was required in four patients paced from the atrium to avoid pacing induced atrial fibrillation. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy was used in 42% of patients to help control SVT. Conclusions: (1) Drug-resistant SVTs can be safely and effectively managed on the long-term with antitachycardia pacemakers. (2) Rapid termination of SVT improved the quality-of-life significantly by avoiding prolonged episodes of tachycardia and repetitive hospital admissions.     

''Long-Term Results of Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia

Between 1979 and 1984 the Cybertach-60, (Intermedics, Inc. Model 262-01), a programmable, automatic antitachycardia pacemaker was implanted in 11 patients who had drug-refractory supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). The patients have been followed for a total of 64-108 (mean 84 months). All patients were symptomatic and had failed two or more drugs and six patients had required prior DC cardioversion. The mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia was atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry in six patients, AV reentry in four patients, and atrial tachycardia in one patient. Preoperatively all patients had reliable termination of the tachycardia without induction of atrial fibrillation by pacing methods available to Cybertach-60. Postimplant, Cybertach-60 reliably terminated all episodes of tachycardia without ancillary drug therapy. Nevertheless, at long-term follow-up antitachycardia pacing was effective and safe in the minority (36%), with only four patients out of eleven still using a pacemaker for supraventricular tachycardia. One of these four patients required additional drug therapy. In one of the patients, the Cybertach-60 was replaced after 78 months by a more advanced device, (Intertach, Intermedics, Inc.) because of a depleted Cybertach-60 battery. In seven patients who no longer use antitachycardia pacing for termination of tachycardia, one patient developed atrial fibrillation during tachycardia termination (at 58 months postimplant). Three patients experienced induction of tachycardia or atrial fibrillation by the pacemaker due to undersensing of sinus P waves (at 36, 48, and 51 months).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Atrial Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia: Clinical Experience with the Intertach Pacemaker

MCCOMB, J.M., ET AL.: Atrial Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia: Clinical Experience with the Intertach Pacemaker. During a 3-year period, 22 patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia have been treated with antitachycardia pacemakers [Intermedics Intertach, 262–12, n = 17, and Intertach II, 262–16, n = 5). Eighty-two percent were female, the mean age was 44 ± 14 years; 86% had atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. Symptoms had occurred over 11.8 ± 7.1 years, with 3.6 hospital admissions per patient, despite 4.7 ± 2.1 antiarrhythmic drugs. Following pacemaker implantation, during a follow-up of 14.8 ± 11.5 months, only two patients have been readmitted to a hospital because of supraventricular tachycardia (mean 0.1 per patient). One patient is taking an antiarrhythmic agent, and four are taking beta adrenergic blocking agents. Thus, 23% are taking cardioactive drugs (it was anticipated that two patients would continue on drugs after pacemaker implantation). There have been no serious complications. Atrial antitachycardia is thus an effective therapy in carefully selected patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia, reducing hospital admissions for supraventricular tachycardia and reducing the need for antiarrhythmic drugs.     

Comparison of Two Antitachycardia Pacing Modes in Supraventricular Tachycardia

The comparative efficacy of two different antitachycardia pacing techniques was evaluated in 22 consecutive patients who received the pacemaker Intertach® with an atrial electrode for drug refractory, recurrent Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). The Intertach® has two consecutive programmable primary and secondary termination modes. The termination programs investigated were adaptive autodecremental burst pacing and adaptive decremental scanning. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia was present in 15 patients and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia due to Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in seven patients. The prospective comparison was arranged in a randomized, cross-over study over a period of 12 months. To assess long-term efficacy, diagnostic data of the pacemakers were obtained in intervals of 3 months. In addition, noninvasive programmed stimulation was performed to compare the incidence of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation with both termination programs. During a follow-up of 12 months the overall success rate of autodecremental burst pacing and decremental scanning was 80% and 95%, respectively. Decremental scanning was more effective in 12 patients and less successful in two patients than autodecremental burst pacing. During noninvasive electrophysiological studies, pacing induced atrial fibrillation could be documented in three often patients (30%) using autodecremental burst pacing, compared to one often patients (10%) using decremental scanning. These data suggest that decremental scanning proved to be more successful in the long-term management of patients with recurrent S VT than autodecremental burst pacing. Furthermore, the occurrence of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation could be documented more frequently with autodecremental burst pacing compared to decremental scanning.     

The Importance of Antitachycardia Pacing for Patients Presenting with Ventricular Tachycardia

The initial experience from electrophysiological studies showed that pacing induced termination of ventricular tachycardias is usually possible but requires a critical pacing sequence. Studies on the resetting phenomenon showed, in most instances of failure of termination, that the "limiting factor" to produce ventricular tachycardia termination is usually failure to produce block within the circuit rather than failure to access or interact with the ventricular tachycardia origin. The resetting response is related to tachycardia termination in a number of ways. Of note is that a steeply increasing resetting pattern usually predicts tachycardia termination. Between 50% and 90% of induced ventricular tachycardias will be terminated by trains of rapid ventricular pacing. The analysis of the pacing rate necessary for termination shows that it varies widely. Paced cycle lengths of < 80% of tachycardia cycle length are necessary in at least 20% of tachycardias. In contrast, the incidence of acceleration is closely related to the paced cycle length: it is negligible with paced cycle lengths over 80% of tachycardia cycle length and increases to 36% with paced cycle lengths below 76% of tachycardia cycle length. Present information about efficacy of antitachycardia pacing in spontaneous tachycardias suggests that it is extremely effective, with over 90% success. However, it is likely that these data correspond to a selected group of tachycardias.     

Permanent Antitachycardia Pacemaker Therapy for Ventricular Tachycardia

This article describes our experience with an antitachycardia pacemaker alone (N = 3) or in combination with an automatic implontoble cardioverter defibrillator (AICD, N = 8) in the treatment of ventricular tochycardia. EJeven patients (mean ejection fraction 31%, mean oge 67 years) received an antitachycardia pacemaker. Nine had their units programmed for automatic antitachycardia pacing, one unit was programmed to automatic antitachycardia pacing by magnet activation only, and one to tachycardia detection and bradycardia support. Of the nine patients with automatic antitachycardia pacing, seven received appropriate and successful pace termination of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia at up to 120 times per month. Eight of these nine have had AICD implantations as well. There were no operative complications. Over a mean (± SD) follow-up of 12.1 ± 9.3 months (range 3–29 months), there have been two deaths, both due to heart failure. There have been four AICD discharges in three patients. Two units discharged in a clinically appropriate setting. The other two units, both with rate cutoffs <200 beats/min, were inadvertently triggered by the antitachycardia pacemaker and/or the underlying rate. In addition to the careful selection of the defibrillator rate cutoff, adverse device-device interactions were avoided by careful intraoperative lead positioning, and the disabling of bradycardia pacing when not needed or contraindicated. Antitachycardia pacing, with the safety provided by the AICD, is an effective treatment for patients with medically refractory ventricular tachycardia.     

The Relationship between Pacing Site and Induction or Termination of Sustained Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia by Antitachycardia Pacing

Background: With the development of left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization, there is an interest in the possibility of improving ventricular antitachycardia pacing (ATP) efficacy by pacing from the LV electrode(s).
Objective: This study assessed the efficacy of pacing delivered from the left coronary vein (LCV) compared to that delivered from the right ventricular apex (RVA) upon ventricular tachycardia (VT) induction and termination.
Methods: Sixty patients undergoing provocative ventricular electrophysiology (EP) studies in three centers were enrolled. Multipolar EP catheters were placed in the atrium, the RVA, and LCV. VT induction was attempted from the RVA and LCV in random order. Upon detection of monomorphic VT, burst ATP for up to 10 pulses at 88% VT cycle length was delivered from the RVA or LCV, in a random order, and crossed over when possible. Identical VT morphologies were reinduced to allow paired comparison of RVA versus LCV ATP.
Results: Data from 55 patients were analyzed. Thirty-four morphologically distinct monomorphic VT types were induced in 22 patients. ATP succeeded in 18 (55%) and VTs in 13 patients. RVA ATP terminated 15 of 23 (65%) VTs, and LCV ATP terminated 10 of 23 (43%) VTs (P = 0.14). ATP delivered ipsilateral to the earliest activation site required 5.0 ± 2.6 pulses to terminate compared to 4.8 ± 1.7 pulses when delivered from the contralateral site (P = 0.90). Paired comparison was possible for 13 VT morphologies in 11 patients. Paired RVA and LCV ATP efficacy was identical (54 % vs 54%, P = 1.0).
Conclusion: ATP delivered from a LCV lead offers no efficacy advantage over pacing from the RVA. (PACE 2010; 27–32)     

Implantable Pacers for Tachycardia Termination: Stimulation Techniques and Long-Term Efficacy

The long-term efficacy of pacing for termination o/supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) was reviewed. Increasingly complex and sophisticated antitachycardia pacing stimulation patterns have evolved, and are outlined. Although excellent results are reported with simple patterns, it may be that the more complex algorithms increase the percentage o/tachycardia patients who may be candidates for implantation of a device. In the papers reviewed, there were 460 patients, 268 with SVT, and 192 with VT. Results were judged to be good-excellent in 96.5% of both VT and SVT groups.     

Pacing for Ventricular Tachycardia

Plusieurs problèmes restent à résoudre avant que les stimulateurs puissent jouer un rôle majeur dans le traitement de la tachycardie ventriculaire. Nous citons des exemples pour illustrer quelques difficultés à résoudre. les mécanismes qui contribuent au succès ou à l'échec de la stimulation antitachycardie sont discutés. L'avenir de cette stimulation sera plus assuré dès que ces appareils serent équipés d'un cardioverteur-défibrillateur de secours.     

Discrimination of Supraventricular Tachycardia from Sinus Tachycardia of Overlapping Cycle Length

Depuis plus de 35 ans, des stimulateurs ont été impiantés pour le traitement des tachycardies. Les systèmes non-automatiques ne sont pas utitisés d'une façon générale parce qu'ils necéssitent une participation directe de la part des patients. Les systèmes automatiques ont été limités par le manque de flexibilityé des paramètres programmables et par leur incapacityé de distinguer les tachycardies sinusales des tachycardies pouvant étre interrompues par la stimulation. De nouveaux algorithmes permettant de faire cette différentiation commencent a être disponibles. En plus des critères de détection qui utilisent la fréquence, il y a trois autres critères qui puissent caractériser les tachycardies: (1) le début brusque; (2) la stabilityé de la fréquence; (3) une fréquence élevée soutenue. Des futurs stimulateurs antitachycardie seront capables d'employer des algorithmes encore plus élaborés dès que des microprocesseurs et des capteurs plus sophistiqués seront disponibles.     

Clinical Experience with the Intertach 262-12 Pulse Generator in Patients with Recurrent Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardia

FROMER, M., ET AL.: Clinical Experience with the Intertach 262-12 Pulse Generator in Patients with Recurrent Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardia. An antitachycardia pulse generator, the Intermedics Intertach 262-12 was implanted in 16 patients (14 patients with supraventricular tachycardia of various origins and two patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia), who were not responsive to various antiarrhythmic drug regimens. The follow-up was from 6–49 months (mean 30.9 ± 13.8). Five patients had a follow-up of over 3 years. The device was used in all patients. One patient with ventricular tachycardia died from a nonarrhythmic cause. Loss of responsiveness to burst pacing was observed in 1/14 patients with supraventricular tachycardia and nontolerance of antitachycardia pacing in one patient. Overall clinical success of pacing was observed in 13/16 patients = 81%. The pacemaker proved to be a versatile system with reliable tachycardia detection and termination functions.     

Clinical Experience with a New Software-Based Antitachycardia Pacemaker for Recurrent Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardias

The Intermedics Intertach 262-12 tachycardia reversion pulse generator was implanted in 14 patients (six male, eight female, mean age at implantation 45 +/- 16 years) with recurrent symptomatic tachycardias. Six patients had atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia, three patients had orthodromic tachycardia with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, two had circus movement tachycardia via a concealed bypass tract, two had ventricular tachycardia, one patient had atrial flutter. Mean duration of symptoms before implantation was 8 +/- 4 years and mean number of antiarrhythmic drug trials was 3.5 +/- 1. The primary tachycardia response made consisted of autodecremental pacing in one patient, burst pacing in two patients, and adaptive scanning of the initial delay or burst cycle length in eleven patients. The secondary tachycardia response mode consisted of autodecremental pacing in four patients, burst pacing in three patients and burst scanning in four patients. Tachycardia response was automatic in all but one patient with ventricular tachycardia. During a follow-up period of 30.5 +/- 10.6 months, one patient with ventricular tachycardia died from a nonarrhythmic cause. Reinterventions were necessary due to electrode fracture in one patient and due to pacemaker software defect in another one. Two patients underwent surgical cure of their arrhythmia: one patient with atrial flutter and one patient with AV nodal reentry tachycardia, 24 months and 11 months postpacemaker implantation, respectively. Four patients required digitalis to prevent pacing induced atrial fibrillation. Other proarrhythmic effects were not encountered. The pacemaker proved to be a versatile system with reliable tachycardia detection and termination functions. It provided a valuable adjunctive therapy in these selected patients.     

The Impact of Antitachycardia Pacing with Defibrillation

Chronic recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) can be reproducibly terminated by programmed endocardiaJ right ventricular stimulation. However, antitachycardia pacing can be associated with possible acceleration of VT, while frequent episodes of VT and patient discomfort can limit treatment by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The combined use of antitachycardia pacing and the AICD (automatic implantable cardioverier defibrillator) was evaluated in 6 out of 51 patients (age 57 ± 11 years) in whom the AICD had been implanted because of recurrent VT. In each instance VT could be terminated by temporary overdrive pacing. The interactive mode of VT termination by a pacemaker (Tachylog) as well as by the AICD was assessed after implantation. In the automatic mode, the Tachylog functioned as a bipolar, ventricular inhibited (VVI) device with antitachycardia burst stimulation capability, allowing two to five stimuli at intervals of 260–300 ms and one or two interventions. During follow-up of 47 ± 24 months, the Tachylog terminated VT reliably 50–505 times per patient. When burst stimulation accelerated VT, termination was achieved by AICD discharge. Thus, drug resistant VT can be terminated by antitachycardia pacing to avoid patient discomfort. In the event of tachycardia acceleration, VT was terminated by the AICD. A universal pacemaker-defibrillafor should combine antibradycardia and antitachycardia pacing with back-up cardioversion defibrillation.     

Comparative Effectiveness of Pacing Techniques for Termination of Well-Tolerated Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia

Ventricular tachycardias can be terminated by a variety of pacemaker techniques, including rapid and slow stimulation. Fast tachycardias are typically poorly tolerated, and require prompt intervention, usually with rapid pacing. Termination of ventricular tachycardia by slow or single capture pacemaker stimulation techniques is attractive, because of its presumed safety and the possibility of using simple implantable pacers. To identify factors favoring termination, single capture stimulation was used in 390 episodes of ventricular tachycardia in 21 patients, 16 with coronary artery disease, able to tolerate ventricular tachycardia forseveral minutes. Single capture stimulation terminated 223 episodes (57%) in 18 patients, and two were accelerated. Of 157 episodes exposed to 2–3 programmed extrastimuli or rapid pacing 149 (94%) were terminated and 7 were accelerated. Direct current cardioversion was needed in 12 episodes. Without medications, only two patients tolerated VT. Only one patient had reliable termination with single capture stimulation over several days. Systolic blood pressure was similar in episodes terminated and not terminated by single capture stimulation, but the ventricular rate was significantly lower in episodes terminated, 116 ± 19 vs. 133 ±24 (p<0.001). Termination of ventricular tachycardia was not affected by QRS morphology. Single capture termination of ventricular tachycardia is largely unpredictable, with limited reproducibility over a period of time. Although comparatively safe, single capture techniques are not likely toprove useful in the long-term treatment of many patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia.     

Programmable External Automatic Antitachycardia Pacing as a Bridge to Definitive Therapy in Patients with Recurrent Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia

The efficacy and safety of external programmable automatic antitachycardia pacemakers (ATPs) used in the critical care setting for recurrent sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) was evaluated. Ten patients who had failed a mean of 4.0 +/- 1.4 antiarrhythmic medications (range 2-7) and who had previously required electrical cardioversion for VT were enrolled. Prior to ATP use, successful overdrive pacing termination of VT was demonstrated in all patients. Intertach (Intermedics, Inc.; n = 9) and Orthocor II (Cordis, Inc.; n = 1) ATPs were attached to temporary bipolar transvenous or epicardial pacing leads. Mean patient age was 66.4 +/- 11.5 years, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 22 +/- 7.5%. At the time of initial ATP use, mean VT cycle length was 347 +/- 88 msec (range 280-550 msec). A burst scanning antitachycardia pacing algorithm was used in each patient; one patient was also treated with a fixed rate burst adapted to VT cycle length. The duration of ATP use ranged from 2-25 days (median 5), successfully terminating greater than 3,369 VT episodes (median 3, range 0 to greater than 3,103 episodes per-patient). Two episodes of ATP induced rate acceleration occurred, each successfully terminated by the ATP. Only two patients required external cardioversion during ATP use, one for primary ventricular fibrillation and one for rapid polymorphic VT associated with antiarrhythmic drug withdrawal. ATPs also provided antibradycardia pacing and allowed for serial programmed ventricular stimulation. No complications were associated with transvenous catheter or ATP use.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Device Interaction—Antitachycardia Pacemakers and Defibrillators for Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia

We evaluated the combined use of permanent automatic antitachycardia pacemakers and implanted defibrillators in fen patients with recurrent monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Pacemaker programming was VVI-T automatic burst in eight patients, VVI-T magnet mode in one patient, and VVI in one patient. Device interactions occurred in four patients, requiring changes in pacemaker programming. These included defibrillator multiple counting during pacing, in-appropriate pacemaker bursts initiating VT, inappropriate reset of the pacemaker antitachycardia mode by defibrillation, defibrillator discharge after pacemaker VT termination, and defibrillator VT reinitiation. Two patients required pacemaker programming out of the antitachycardia mode, and two required a change in antitachycardia pacing parameters. Seven patients remain in automatic VVI-T and three in VVI modes. Mean follow-up is 13 months and all patients are alive. Thus, although pacemaker/ defibrillafor combinations function well for patients with more than one VT rate, device interactions occur frequently and may require pacemaker reprogramming or elimination of the overdrive mode. Combined use of these devices should be cautiously considered when single device therapy is unsatisfactory. Devices that combine both pacing and defibrillation features may reduce adverse interaction.     

Long-Term Management of Ventricular Tachycardia by Implantable Automatic Burst Tachycardia-Terminating Pacemakers

This report describes the Jong-term follow-up of two patients who received implantable automatic burst tachycardia-terminating ventricular pacemakers for the treatment of drug-refractory sustained ventricular tachycardia. After implantation, both pulse generators continued to terminate ventricular tachycardia without any major complications. In one patient, after three years, many episodes of ventricular tachycardia were slower than the tachycardia-detection criterion rate of 137 per minute; ventricular tachycardia was then terminated by chest wall stimulation that activated the burst function of the pacemaker. In this particular patient, the pulse generator was removed after four and one-half years and replaced with a DDD system because of the pacemaker syndrome and attacks of ventricular tachycardia, often at a rate of about 100/minute. In the second patient, the pacemaker continued to terminate ventricular tachycardia for over five and one-half years as determined by the repeated activation of the flag (memory) function of the pacemaker indicating detection of tachycardia by the pulse generator and resultant delivery of burst pacing.     

Antitachycardia Pacing: A Comparison of Burst Overdrive, Self-Searching and Adaptive Table Scanning Programs

Eight patients with the Siemens Elema "Tachylog" generator implanted for management of paroxysmal reentrant tachycardia were studied to assess the safety and efficiency of three antitachycardia programs. The programs investigated were burst overdrive, self-searching, and adaptive table scanning. There were five males and three females aged 19-62 years. Seven had Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, and one had dual atrioventricular nodal pathways. Four had right atrial electrodes and four had right ventricular electrodes. Patients were studied lying, standing, and exercising in all three modes, and the appropriate long-term programs were chosen. The generator remained in a program for 1 month, it was interrogated and the memory was read, and then it was reprogrammed to a different antitachycardia mode. Burst overdrive was unsuitable for long-term use in four patients, producing atrial fibrillation in one and ventricular arrhythmias in three. In this group, self-searching and adaptive table scanning were safe and equally effective (mean number of attempts/tachycardia 6.97 and 6.3, respectively). In the four patients in whom all three programs could be used, burst overdrive proved to be most efficient, the mean number of attempts/tachycardia were 2.4 (cf 9.6 and 9.0 for self-searching and adaptive table scanning). Thus, burst overdrive was only suitable for long-term use in 50% of our patients, but when safe it was more efficient than the other two programs, especially in those with narrow termination windows on exercise.     

Local Activation Time Derived from Stored EGM is Associated with Failure of Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Implantable Defibrillator

Background : Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) is an effective treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, persistent failure of ATP in some patients is well recognized. Methods : A method of deriving the local activation time from stored intracardiac electrograms in implantable cardioverter defibrillators is described. Using a case‐control design, the local activation times were compared between patients with persistent unsuccessful ATP with comparable controls with successful ATP. Results : The local activation times during VT in patients with failed ATP were longer at 120–180 ms compared with corresponding control patients with successful ATP (60–80 ms). The local activation time expressed as a proportion of VT cycle length in patients with failed ATP compared with patients with successful ATP were 0.40 ± 0.08 versus 0.19 ± 0.08 (P = 0.012). Conclusion : A novel method of deriving local activation time is described, and delayed local activation time may explain failure of ATP in terminating VT in some patients. (PACE 2010; 549–552)     

Antitachycardia Pacing

Patients who have attempted repair of congenital heart disease often develop bradycardia and tachycardias postoperatively. The two dysrhythmias each make treatment of the other more difficult. Pacing is the only modality that addresses both brady- and tachycardias, without adversely influencing the other. Most postoperative tachycardias are reentrant, and thus uniquely susceptible to overdrive pacing. Usually an atrial single lead system is used. The patients most commonly encountered are those with extensive atrial surgery, such as atrial septal defect [ASD] repair. Mustard and Senning repair of d-transposition, and the various types of Fontan operations. The results are excellent for ASD repair and postoperative transposition, but only fair for postoperative Fontan patients.