肱骨头置换术中肱骨大结节固定及肩袖修复研究进展

目的总结肱骨头置换术中肱骨大结节固定及肩袖修复方式的研究进展。方法广泛查阅近年来国内外肱骨头置换以及肱骨近端骨折治疗相关文献,并进行总结分析。结果肱骨大结节固定及其附着肩袖修复对肱骨头置换术后肩关节功能有明显影响。为促进肱骨大结节愈合,学者就肱骨大结节固定方法及材料进行了研究,但针对不同固定方法及材料缺少随机对照研究及统一的评分量表,同时由于病例数有限,难以进行客观比较。结论肱骨大结节良好复位固定是肱骨头置换术获得较好疗效的重要因素。但就肩关节功能恢复方面,肱骨头置换时一期修复肩袖比大结节复位固定更重要。     

Association of osteopenia of the humeral head with full-thickness rotator cuff tears

Rotator cuff tendon repair may fail for various reasons. Although the role of repair techniques and of the musculotendinous unit has been studied, there is little information on the quality of the bone to which the tendon is to be repaired. Therefore, 14 cadaveric humeral heads, 7 specimens without and 7 with a full-thickness rotator cuff tendon tear, were quantitatively assessed by use of high-resolution micro-computed tomography. Bone density is higher below the articular surface than in the greater tuberosity (40% vs 10%-20%), and tendon tears are associated with a reduction in cancellous bone density of greater than 50%, leading to a virtually hollow greater tuberosity, with intact cortical bone. The results found suggest that in long-standing rotator cuff tears, creating a deep trough should be avoided to achieve reliable tendon-to-bone contact. For optimal suture fixation to bone, sutures or anchors should be positioned subcortically or medially under the articular surface.     

Mini-open rotator cuff repair

Open shoulder procedures require a deltoid release for proper exposure. Arthroscopic techniques have progressed so that minimally invasive techniques give similar outcomes as more formal open procedures with less risk of morbidity. Arthroscopically assisted open rotator cuff repair offers advantages over open procedures with some diagnostic and decompression performed with the arthroscope. The mini-open technique has more aspects of a cuff repair performed through the arthroscope leaving a few steps to be done open. The modern use of arthroscopic techniques for minimally invasive rotator cuff surgery coupled with advances in rehabilitation is discussed.     

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is being performed by an increasing number of orthopaedic surgeons. The principles, techniques, and instrumentation have evolved to the extent that all patterns and sizes of rotator cuff tear, including massive tears, can now be repaired arthroscopically. Achieving a biomechanically stable construct is critical to biologic healing. The ideal repair construct must optimize suture-to-bone fixation, suture-to-tendon fixation, abrasion resistance of suture, suture strength, knot security, loop security, and restoration of the anatomic rotator cuff footprint (the surface area of bone to which the cuff tendons attach). By achieving optimized repair constructs, experienced arthroscopic surgeons are reporting results equal to those of open rotator cuff repair. As surgeons' arthroscopic skill levels increase through attendance at surgical skills courses and greater experience gained in the operating room, there will be an increasing trend toward arthroscopic repair of most rotator cuff pathology.     

Massive rotator cuff tears repaired on top of humeral head by McLaughlin's procedure

The clinical and radiographic outcomes of McLaughlin's procedure for massive rotator cuff tears were investigated in 25 shoulders, in which the cuff tears were so severe that the tendons were sutured on the top of the humeral head. The mean age at surgery was 62.2 years (range, 39-74 years). The mean follow-up period was 50 months (range, 24-80 months). The University of California, Los Angeles score significantly improved from 10.9 to 31.8 points postoperatively; the postoperative result was classified as excellent in 11 shoulders, good in 11, and poor in 3. Osteoarthritis progressed postoperatively in 7 shoulders (28%), and upper migration of the humeral head progressed in 6 (24%), although both progression rates were no higher than those for other common procedures. When torn tendons reach over the top of the humeral head with the arm at the side in patients with massive tears that are not reparable to the greater tuberosity, satisfactory clinical outcomes can be expected.     

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

The arthroscopic operation for repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears is successful and has the advantages of glenohumeral joint inspection, treatment of intraarticular lesions, smaller incisions, no deltoid detachment, less soft tissue dissection, less pain, and more rapid rehabilitation. However, these advantages must be balanced against the technical difficulty of the method, which limits its application to surgeons skilled in open and arthroscopic shoulder operations.     

Position of the humeral head and rotator cuff tearAn anatomical observation in cadavers

Background The relationship between the humeral head position and rotator cuff tears is not well described. Material and methods We performed an anatomical study of 22 cadaveric shoulders to find out the relationship between the normal anatomical position of the humeral head and tears of the rotator cuff. After dissection, the rotator cuff pathology was documented. The position of the humeral head was noted in relation to the acromion. The humeral head with intact acromion and articulated shoulder joint was photographed from the superior aspect of the joint and the area of the humeral head outside the acromion was measured, i.e. the part of the humeral head lateral to the lateral border of the acromion process. The relationship between rotator cuff pathology and uncovering of the humeral head was determined. Results 9 specimens had a partial cuff tear, while 4 had a complete tear. Those specimens with a rotator cuff tear had a mean area of 83% of the humeral head under the acromion. The specimens that did not show a rotator cuff tear had a mean area of 61% of the humeral head under the acromion. Interpretation We suggest that there is individual variation in anatomical position of the humeral head in relation to the acromion and that this position correlates with the occurrence of rotator cuff pathology.     

肩袖损伤的关节镜下治疗

目的探讨肩关节镜手术治疗肩袖损伤的适应证选择、手术技巧和疗效。方法2002年3月至2005年5月对68例患者行关节镜下肩袖重建,其中40例获得随访,以其为研究对象。年龄30~81岁,平均年龄56岁,其中29例发生于主力侧。根据Gerber分型,其中部分肩袖损伤8例,中小型肩袖损伤27例,巨大肩袖损伤5例。手术均采用金属缝合锚(Super-Revo)进行肩袖重建。分别在术前及最终随访时采用美国肩肘医师协会评分(ASES)、Constant-Murley评分以及简易肩关节评分(SST)问卷进行功能评估。结果40例患者获得随访,随访时间12~40个月,平均20.6个月。40例患者手术前及终末随访时ASES平均分为72.6对92.3(P<0.001),其中VAS疼痛评分平均为6.2对1.8(P<0.001),肩关节平均前屈上举为74.5°对146.0°(P<0.001),平均外旋为27.8°对38.3°(P<0.01),ASES评分为优和良所占的比例为92.5%(37/40),平均Constant-Murley评分为69.6对90.4(P<0.001),Constant-Murley评分为优和良所占的比例为90.0%(36/40)。结论肩关节镜下肩袖重建手术具有损伤小、肩关节功能恢复快等特点,尤其在保护三角肌方面具有独到的优势,是治疗肩袖损伤的有效方法之一。正确的适应证选择、熟练的关节镜下操作技术以及术后严格的功能康复锻炼是手术成功的关键。     

Outcome of rotator cuff repair

From 710 consecutive open rotator cuff repairs by a single surgeon, the results of 667 were available for detailed analysis. Patient-assessed outcomes and the ability to perform specific activities of daily living, employment, and recreation were correlated with independent nonstructural variables including age, sex, workers' compensation status, and revision surgery status. The study shows that patient self-assessment of satisfaction is very high, with 87.5% of all respondents pleased overall. Detailed assessment is provided of certain subgroups that are more likely to report worse results after surgery. These include patients on workers' compensation, those undergoing revision surgery, and those younger than 55 years of age. Information presented here may be useful during preoperative counseling for rotator cuff repairs, to ensure realistic patient expectations.     

Infection after rotator cuff repair

Sixteen patients (15 men and 1 woman) were treated for infection complicating rotator cuff repair during the period 1975 through 1994. Eight of the 16 patients had their initial procedure performed elsewhere. The remaining 8 procedures were performed at our institution with the known incidence of this complication being 0.27%. In addition to intravenous antibiotic therapy, an average of 3.5 (range 2 to 8) operative procedures were required to eradicate the infections. Micro-organisms cultured were Propionibacter in 6, coagulase negative Staphylococcus in 4, Staphylococcus aureus in 4, Peptostreptococcus magnus in 1, and both Propionibacter and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in 1. The deltoid was restored in all patients; the rotator cuff was reparable in 11. In the 12 shoulders with greater than 1 year of follow-up (average 51 months, range 14 to 165 months), active elevation averaged 110 degrees and external rotation 50 degrees. Four patients had no pain, 4 had minimal pain, and the remaining 4 had moderate pain. Satisfactory final results, which were determined by the patients' opinion or with the use of either the University of California, Los Angeles score or the modified Neer system, were obtained in 5 (42%) of the shoulders.     

Arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair

Rotator cuff injuries or disease can be particularly troubling to patients by causing them pain, weakness, and dysfunction of the shoulder. Surgery of the shoulder and, in particular, of the rotator cuff, has evolved over the years from open surgery to include arthroscopic treatment for many conditions. Although technically demanding, arthroscopic repair of full- and partial-thickness rotator cuff tears has been shown to produce satisfactory results. Along with the advantages of the arthroscopic technique, smaller skin incisions, access to the glenohumeral joint for inspection and treatment of intra-articular lesions, no detachment of the deltoid, and less soft-tissue dissection, patients' results are comparable with those obtained with the open method of repair. The three phases of shoulder rehabilitation for patients who have undergone surgical treatment of rotator cuff disease are described: Phase 1, the immediate postoperative, or protective, phase; phase 2, the progressive strengthening phase; and phase 3, the advanced conditioning and return-to-sport phase. The postoperative rehabilitation programs for the arthroscopic and mini-open rotator cuff repair are essentially the same.     

Arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair

Rotator cuff repair leads to good and excellent outcomes in most patients. However, structural failure of the repair occurs in a substantial number of cases and can lead to an unsatisfactory result. Several factors have been implicated, including patient-related factors (eg, patient age, tear size) and extrinsic factors (eg, surgeon surgical volume, biomechanical failure). Structural failure requires a detailed patient evaluation to elucidate the cause of persistent symptoms. Function can be maintained despite a recurrent tear; therefore, a recurrent tear alone is not an indication for revision repair. The major indication for revision rotator cuff repair is the persistence of clinical symptoms, despite nonsurgical management, in the absence of substantial risk factors for failure. Although the outcome is poorer than after primary repair, satisfactory results have been reported following revision repair of recurrent rotator cuff tears, particularly with arthroscopic techniques.     

Massive rotator cuff tears: the result of partial rotator cuff repair

Massive rotator cuff tears often defy traditional repair techniques and have led to a variety of treatment recommendations. We reviewed retrospectively the results of partial repair of massive rotator cuff tears in 24 patients. Overall results were excellent in 11 patients (46%), good in 5 (21%), fair in 7 (29%), and poor in 1 (4%). Ninety-two percent of patients were satisfied with the result of surgery. Satisfactory pain relief was achieved in 83% (P<.001). Active elevation improved from 114 degrees to 154 degrees , and no patient lost strength after surgery. The ability to raise the arm to at least 135 degrees improved from 13 patients preoperatively to 21 patients postoperatively. This series serves as a basis of comparison to debridement, tendon transfers, and tendon augmentation procedures for the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.     

Biologic augmentation of rotator cuff repair

Rotator cuff repair is commonly performed to provide pain relief and improve shoulder function in patients with pain and disability related to cuff tears. However, re-tear rates following repair remain remarkably high in certain patient populations. Biologic strategies to reinforce repairs or augment tendon healing, such as extracellular matrices and platelet-rich plasma therapy, are an area of increased interest among orthopedic surgeons to improve these suboptimal healing rates. As more products have become commercially available, much attention has been turned to determining the optimal augmentation technique. However, data supporting the role and efficacy of these products is limited. Thus careful patient selection remains the most essential strategy for optimizing tendon healing potential following rotator cuff repair.     

Superior excursion of the humeral head: a diagnostic tool in rotator cuff tear surgery

Superior excursion of the humeral head on the face of the glenoid was investigated to determine whether a relationship exists between the degree of humeral head excursion and the identity of the injured tendon in a shoulder with a torn rotator cuff. Twenty-seven patients with unilateral full-thickness rotator cuff tears diagnosed by either positive arthrogram or magnetic resonance imaging were included in this study. Three groups were formed based on intraoperative findings: 10 patients had isolated supraspinatus tendon tears (group 1), 11 patients had supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears (group 2), and 6 patients had supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis tendon tears (group 3). There was no statistically significant difference between the degree of humeral head excursion in groups 1 and 2. However, patients in group 3 had a statistically significantly higher degree of excursion of the humeral head (P < .05) when compared with groups 1 and 2. In addition, an inverse relationship between the degree of humeral head excursion and preoperative Constant scores was found. Superior excursion of the humeral head on the glenoid had a significantly higher incidence in patients with subscapularis tears, and a larger amount of excursion was present in patients who had lower preoperative Constant scores.