Low-dose weekly paclitaxel as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study

PURPOSE: To assess the activity and toxicity of low-dose weekly paclitaxel in patients with non-resectable or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and who had disease recurrence or failure with previous chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy received weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) as a 1 h infusion. The median age was 63 years (range 42-77 years); 25 patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 1 and 15 had PS 2. Thirty-one patients had stage IV disease and nine stage III (eight stage IIIB and one stage IIIA). RESULTS: A total of 364 weeks of treatment were administered (median 8 weeks, range 2-17 weeks). There were no episodes of grade 3 or 4 haematological toxicities. Severe non-haematological toxicity was uncommon: grade 1-2 asthenia in 50%; grade 1-2 motor neuropathy in 45% and grade 3 in 10%; grade 1-2 sensory neuropathy in 62% of patients. Alopecia was mild. The overall response rate was 37.5% (95% CI, 23.9-55): 2 CR, 13 PR, 15 SD, 8 PD, 2 NE. Median overall survival was 9.7 months (95% CI, 6.5-12.8). Median time to progression was 5.4 months (95% CI, 1.8-8.9). CONCLUSION: A low-dose weekly paclitaxel regimen had good clinical efficacy with low toxicity in this group of patients with poor prognosis. This regimen increases the therapeutic options available for second-line therapy in NSCLC patients.     

Phase II study of weekly chemotherapy with paclitaxel and gemcitabine as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy

Purpose We evaluated the tolerability and activity of the combination of weekly paclitaxel (PTX) and gemcitabine (GEM) in second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients and methods PTX (100 mg/m²) and GEM (1,000 mg/m²) were administered to patients with previous treated NSCLC on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Results A total of 40 patients (performance status 0/1/2, 7/27/6 pts) were enrolled. The response rate was 32.5% (95% confidence interval: 18.0–47.0%). The median survival time was 41.7 weeks (95% confidence interval: 28.5–54.7 weeks). The median time to disease progression was 19 weeks. Hematological toxicities (grade 3 or 4) observed included neutropenia in 60%, anemia in 15%, and thrombocytopenia in 12.5% of patients. Non-hematological toxicities were mild, with the exception of grade 3 diarrhea, pneumonitis, and rash in one patient each. There were no deaths due to toxicity. Conclusion The combination of weekly PTX and GEM is a feasible, well-tolerated, and active means of second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.     

A phase II study of weekly paclitaxel in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetic behavior of single-agent paclitaxel given weekly to elderly patients with lung cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Previously untreated patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer were eligible for the study if they were at least 70 years of age and had preserved organ function. Paclitaxel was administered over 1 h at a dose of 90 mg/m(2) for 6 consecutive weeks on an 8-week cycle. The pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel were assessed during the first and sixth week of therapy in a subgroup of eight patients. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients (median age, 76 years; range, 70-85) were enrolled. The overall response rate was 23%. Median time to failure was 5.2 months, whereas the median survival time was 10.3 months. Survival rates after 1 and 2 years were 45 and 22%, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (5.8%), hyperglycemia (17.6%), neuropathy (5.8%), and infection (8.8%). Two patients died from treatment-related toxicity. There was no significant difference (P = 0.18) between the total body clearance of paclitaxel on the first (17.4 +/- 2.9 liters/h/m(2), mean +/- SD) and sixth (15.8 +/- 4.1 liters/h/m(2)) week of therapy. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel administered as a weekly 1-h infusion at a dose of 90 mg/m(2) is a safe and effective therapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Its pharmacokinetics in elderly patients do not appear to differ from historical data for younger patients, and there was no suggestion of a change in drug clearance after repeated weekly dosing.     

Cost-effectiveness of weekly paclitaxel for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Paclitaxel is known to be efficacious in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We initiated a phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel (W-PTX) therapy in advanced NSCLC, and found that W-PTX was feasible for advanced NSCLC patients. We evaluated the cost of W-PTX from receipts and compared it with a standard cisplatin-vinorelbine (VC) regimen. The aim of this study was to assess the cost of W-PTX therapy. Previously untreated patients with stage IV NSCLC and patients with stage III B/IV NSCLC after at least one previous cisplatin based regimen were eligible if they had preserved organ function for treatment. Paclitaxel was administered at a dose of 80 mg/m2 for 3 consecutive weeks on a 4-week cycle. Patients received at least 1 course of W-PTX in our hospital and then, if possible, were treated on outpatients basis. All patients receiving the VC regimen were treated in the hospital. The mean cost of W-PTX for one month was approximately 699,000 yen per inpatient and 236,000 yen per outpatient. On the other hand, the mean cost of VC for one month was approximately 816,000 yen per patient. Although the cost of W-PTX for inpatient did not differ greatly from the cost of VC, the cost of W-PTX for outpatients was significantly lower than that of VC. The findings of this study suggest that W-PTX is feasible as a cost-effective chemotherapy for patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Phase II study of carboplatin combined with weekly docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

This phase II study is performed to evaluate the safety, efficacy and tolerability of carboplatin combined with weekly docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and methods

All patients were treated with the combination of docetaxel 35 mg/m² by IV infusion over 30–60 min weekly, on days 1, 8, and 15, for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest, with intravenous carboplatin (AUC 6) administered immediately afterward on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 28 days.

Results

Forty-seven (95.9%) of the 49 patients were assessable for response, one case of complete response and 17 cases of partial response were confirmed, giving an overall response rate of 36.7% (95% CI 23.2–50.2%). The median time to progression and overall survival (OS) for all patients were 5.2 months (95% CI 4.1–6.3 months) and 10.4 months (95% CI 7.3–13.5 months), respectively. The estimate of OS at 12 months was 37.6% (95% CI 24.0–51.2%). The most severe hematologic adverse event was anemia, which occurred with grade 3/4 intensity in 7 (14.9%) patients. Neutropenia occurred with grade 3 intensity in 4 (8.5%) patients. However, no grade 4 neutropenia was observed. Grade 3 nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, asthenia, nail changes, and skin reaction were observed in 6 (12.8%), 3 (6.4%), 2 (4.3%), 2 (4.3%) and 1 (2.1%) patients. Yet, no grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity was observed.

Conclusions

The combination of carboplatin with weekly docetaxel is a tolerated treatment modality with encouraging activity and survival outcome in previously untreated patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Phase II trial of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background A platinum doublet has been the standard treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and good performance status. This treatment results in almost a doubling of 1-yr survival, along with an improvement in quality of life despite treatment-related toxicities. However, platinum-based treatment may be associated with significant toxicity. Materials and Methods In this trial, we prospectively evaluated a weekly regimen of docetaxel and gemcitabine for advanced NSCLC. The endpoints of this study included objective response rate, survival, and toxicity. Forty-two patients with previously untreated, advanced NSCLC with PS 0-1 were included. Patients received docetaxel (36 mg/m²) and gemcitabine (600 mg/m²) on d 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-d cycle. Responses were assessed every two cycles. The median age was 63 yr; with 22 males and 20 females; 67% were ≥60 years old; and 38 patients had stage IV disease. Results In the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis of response, 16 patients had a partial response (38%) and 15 patients had stable disease (36%). The 1-yr survival was 48%; median survival for all patients was 11.3 mo and the median progression-free survival was 5.1 mo. Toxicities (≥grade 3) included neutropenia (29%), asthenia (26%), diarrhea (14%), thrombocytopenia (10%), pneumonitis (7%), peripheral neuropathy (5%), peripheral edema (5%), nail changes (2%), and myositis (2%). Conclusions This study demonstrated that this non-platinum doublet (docetaxel+gemcitabine) given on a weekly schedule for advanced NSCLC was well tolerated with efficacy comparable to that reported with platinum-based chemotherapy regimens.     

Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have failed previous treatments

OBJECTIVE: New effective therapy is desirable for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have failed previous treatments. Fractionated administration of paclitaxel may be less toxic and more active against NSCLC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel therapy for NSCLC in a second-line setting. METHODS: Patients with pathological or cytological diagnosis of NSCLC, measurable lesions, and one or more prior therapies were enrolled. We administered weekly infusions of 80 mg/m2 paclitaxel 3 times in a 4-week cycle. In the absence of progressive disease or intolerable toxicity, each patient was treated for a minimum of 4 cycles. RESULTS: Of 39 patients enrolled, 1 patient achieved complete response and 11 patients achieved partial response (response rate, 31%: 95% confidence interval, 17-48%). The median survival time was 43 weeks (range, 7-128 weeks). Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia occurred in only 7 patients (18%). Neurotoxicity was the most frequent adverse effect (grades 1 and 2.26 and 5%, respectively). Although all patients recovered rapidly with corticosteroid treatment, drug-induced pneumonitis was observed in 3 patients (8%). CONCLUSION: Low-dose weekly paclitaxel is a promising therapy with high effectiveness for advanced NSCLC in patients with NSCLC who have failed previous treatments.     

Phase I study of the combination of nedaplatin and weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose This trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), principal toxicity, and recommended dose for phase II study of the combination of nedaplatin and weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Patients with previously untreated NSCLC, either stage IIIB with pleural effusion or stage IV, were eligible if they had a performance status of 0–2, were 75 years or younger, and had adequate organ function. The respective doses of nedaplatin (day 1) and weekly paclitaxel (days 1, 8, and 15) studied were 80/60, 80/70, 80/80, 80/90, and 100/90 (mg m⁻²), repeated every 4 weeks. Results From May 2004 through June 2005, 21 patients (18 men and 3 women; median age, 63 years; age range, 53–75 years) were enrolled. The MTD was determined to be 100 mg m⁻² of nedaplatin and 90 mg m⁻² of weekly paclitaxel. Dose-limiting toxicities at the MTD were neutropenic fever and hepatic dysfunction. We recommend doses of 80 mg m⁻² of nedaplatin and 90 mg m⁻² of weekly paclitaxel for phase II study. Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia in 29% of patients, thrombocytopenia in 0%, and anemia in 5%. Although the most frequent non-hematologic toxicity was hepatic dysfunction, all cases were only mildly to moderately severe. Although two patients had grade 3 or 4 pulmonary toxicity due to Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, these patients recovered after receiving trimetoprim-sulfamethoxazole, steroid therapy, and supplemental oxygen. There were no treatment-related deaths. The overall response rate was 19.0% (95% confidence interval, 5.4–41.9%), and all responses were in patients receiving the recommended doses. The median dose-intensities for nedaplatin and paclitaxel were 91.6 and 87.1%, respectively, of the planned doses. Conclusion This combination chemotherapy is active and well tolerated and warrants phase II study.     

Phase II study of cisplatin-combined schedules as second-line chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cisplatin- (CDDP) combined chemotherapy in non-cisplatin pretreated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The second cytotoxic drug administered was either etoposide or gemcitabine. First-line treatment was based on paclitaxel combined with either carboplatin or vinorelbine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with histologically- or cytologically- confirmed NSCLC, having failed front-line treatment, were enrolled. All patients received 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin as second-line treatment, on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks; in 48 patients the second agent was etoposide (120 mg/m2) on days 1, 2 and 3, repeated every 3 weeks and in 30 patients 1 g/m2 of gemcitabine on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. No complete responses were observed. Thirteen (16.67%) patients achieved partial response, 42 (53.85%) stable disease and 23 (29.49%) had disease progression. The median duration of response was 4 months (range 2-8+ months), median time to tumor progression (TTP) 5 months (range 2-9 months) and median survival time after starting second-line chemotherapy, 6 months (range 2-9+ months). Toxicity was acceptable: 9 patients presented with nephrotoxicity (11.54%) and 13 (16.67%) with grade 3-4 neutropenia. CONCLUSION: The cisplatin combination as second-line treatment in patients with NSCLC exhibited a notable degree of activity and tumor growth control was evidenced by the 16.67% partial response and 53.85% disease stability.     

Phase II study of weekly carboplatin and irinotecan as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy has a major role in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The weekly fractionated administration of cisplatin for patients with NSCLC has been shown to be active. Irinotecan and carboplatin are effective against NSCLC and demonstrated synergism with non-cross-resistance in preclinical studies. We conducted a phase II study of weekly combination of carboplatin and irinotecan as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods

From March 2009 to November 2011, 24 patients who were diagnosed with inoperable or metastatic NSCLC were enrolled. Treatment consisted of carboplatin at an AUC 2.5 mg/mL/min over 30-min intravenous infusion and irinotecan 65 mg/m² over 90-min intravenous infusion on day 1 and day 8, respectively. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks.

Results

One patient (4.2 %) achieved complete response, and seven (29.2 %) showed partial response. Overall response rate was 33.3 %, with median response duration of 4.55 months. Nine patients had stable disease, and disease control rate was 70.8 %. With median follow-up of 12.8 months, median progression-free survival was 4.5 months (95 % CI 1.8–7.2), and median overall survival was 15.5 months (95 % CI 6.9–24.1). Major toxicity was myelosuppression. Grade 3–4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 50 and 20.8 % of patients, respectively. Two patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Non-hematologic toxicities were generally mild. One patient suffered grade 4 diarrhea, and one treatment-related death due to pneumonia was occurred.

Conclusion

The weekly combination of carboplatin and irinotecan showed favorable activity and manageable toxicity profiles in chemo-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC. Our results suggest that this regimen can be a reasonable chemotherapeutic option for patients with advanced NSCLC.     

A phase II study of weekly paclitaxel combined with carboplatin for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

We conducted this phase II study to explore the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Elderly patients (> or = 70 years old) of stage IIIB, IV, or recurrent NSCLC with PS 0 or 1 were enrolled. Patients received paclitaxel at a dose of 70 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, 15, and carboplatin at the target dose of the area under the curve (AUC) of six on Day 1 every 28 days for at least two cycles. Forty-two patients were enrolled and 40 patients were treated with a median of three cycles (range, 1-5). The overall response rate (ORR) was 45% (95% confidence interval, 30-60%). The median survival time (MST) was 14 months and the 1-year survival rate was 62%. Twenty-eight patients (70%) had grade 3/4 neutropenia and two patients (5%) experienced grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Non-hematological toxicities were generally mild to moderate and grade 3 peripheral neuropathy was seen in one patient (3%). There was one treatment-related death by infection due to neutropenia. Weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy was an effective and safe regimen in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. A randomized trial comparing this treatment with the conventional tri-weekly regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin is warranted.     

Cisplatin and weekly docetaxel as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer a phase II study

BACKGROUND: Based on the results of previous phase I studies, in the current phase II trial we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin plus weekly docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The eligibility criteria for the study included newly diagnosed stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, age < or = 75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, adequate organ functions, and signed informed consent. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of cisplatin, 80 mg/m2 on day 1, and docetaxel, 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Between January 2002 and December 2003, 31 patients with NSCLC were enrolled in the study. An objective response rate of 40% (95% CI, 21-60) was obtained in 27 assessable patients. The median time to progression was 6.4 months (range, 2.5-26.3) and median overall survival was 10.01 months (range, 5-28.3). The regimen was well tolerated with no grade 4 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin plus weekly docetaxel is an effective and well-tolerated regimen in chemo-naive patients with advanced NSCLC. A phase III study of weekly versus the conventional regimen of every three weeks should be conducted to compare the survival benefits, toxicity profile and quality of life.     

Antiangiogenic agents as second-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

With the approval of the antiangiogenic antibody bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other malignancies, the tumor vasculature has emerged as a worthwhile therapeutic target. Second-line therapies have the potential to improve overall survival and quality of life over best supportive care alone. Accordingly, phase II and phase III studies are actively evaluating antiangiogenic treatments in the second-line setting in NSCLC, and results are awaited. Such therapies include antiangiogenic antibodies, small molecule inhibitors, and vascular-disrupting agents. This review will present the current landscape of angiogenesis inhibition in NSCLC, focusing on use as second-line therapy.     

Cellular immune profile in patients with non-small cell lung cancer after weekly paclitaxel therapy

Paclitaxel is a new agent for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Weekly doses may enhance antitumor activity while minimizing toxicity, but little is known about immune recovery. Paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) was administered to 10 patients with NSCLC, weekly during 3-week cycles. Natural killer (NK) activity, CD3-CD16+CD56+ NK cells, and differential counts were monitored. NK activity appeared in all patients after treatment with paclitaxel therapy NK activity showed a 27 +/- 9% decrease (mean +/- SE) on protocol day 8 and a 37 +/- 7% decrease on day 15 (p < 0.05) recovering to 89 +/- 5% of baseline on day 29. With weekly paclitaxel, a decrease in NK cell function persisted through the first cycle but then recovered. Weekly paclitaxel may be less immunosuppressive than agents such as cisplatin.     

Phase II study of sunitinib as maintenance therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

This open-label, phase II study evaluated the antitumor activity and safety of sunitinib monotherapy as maintenance treatment following first-line chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Following treatment with standard doublet chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin), patients received oral sunitinib (starting dose 50 mg/day) in 6-week cycles (Schedule 4/2: 4 weeks on treatment, 2 weeks off treatment) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was probability of survival at 1 year ≥55%. Of 84 patients who received first-line chemotherapy, 66 (79%) received sunitinib maintenance therapy (median sunitinib cycles started: 2 [range 1-20]). Probability of survival at 1 year was 40.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29.8, 51.0). Median overall survival was 10.4 months (95% CI: 8.0, 12.2). The objective response rate was 27.4% (95% CI: 18.2, 38.2). The most frequently reported all-causality adverse events of any grade during sunitinib maintenance therapy were fatigue/asthenia (55%), diarrhea (36%), and nausea (32%). These data suggest that maintenance therapy may have value in NSCLC, although the primary endpoint of the study was not met.     

Phase I/II study of cisplatin combined with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD) of paclitaxel administered weekly with a fixed dose of cisplatin, and to assess the toxicity and activity of this combination, we conducted a phase I/II trial in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were eligible. Paclitaxel, at a starting dose of 40 mg x m(-2) week(-1) on days 1, 8, and 15, was combined with a fixed dose of cisplatin 80 mg x m(-2) on day 1. Chemotherapy was given in a 4-week cycle. In this phase I/II study, 38 patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were neutropenia, fatigue, and omission of treatment due to leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, or febrile neutropenia. The MTD and RD were estimated to be 70 mg x m(-2). Of the 37 assessable patients, 23 had a partial response and one had a complete response. Overall response rate was 62.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 46.5-77.7%). The progression-free survival, the median survival time, and the 1-year survival rate were 5.5 months, 13.7 months, and 56.9%, respectively. This regimen is tolerable and very active against advanced NSCLC, and its efficacy should be confirmed in a phase III study.     

多西他赛二线治疗23例晚期非小细胞肺癌

目的：评价单药多西他赛[泰索帝)作为二线化疗耐晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效和不良反应，方法：23例经病理和(或)细胞学诊断的晚期非小细胞肺癌．曾用含铂类方案化疗，治疗后复发或进展．接受泰素帝75mg/m^2静滴1小时．第1天．每3周重复。结果：可评价疗效23例中．无完全缓解（CR)，部分缓解(PR）17％(4／23)，稳定(SD)57％(13／23)，进展(PD)26％(6／23)，有效率17％(4／23)；中位生存期9个月，一年生存率39％(9，23)。不良反应主要是血液学毒性，但患者可以耐受。结论：泰素帝草药用于二线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效肯定．耐受性较好。     

A randomized phase II pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of indisulam as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to measure the objective tumor response rate following treatment with indisulam [E7070; N-(3-chloro-7-indolyl)-1,4-benzenedisulfonamide] as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The secondary aims were to determine progression-free survival, to assess the safety and tolerability of indisulam, and to study its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were randomized to receive indisulam every 3 weeks either as a single i.v. dose of 700 mg/m(2) on day one (dx1) or 130 mg/m(2) given on days 1 to 5 inclusive as a daily infusion (dx5). All patients had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were randomized. Only minor responses were seen. Myelosuppression, gastrointestinal symptoms, and lethargy were the most common toxicities and were more frequent in the dx1 arm. The pharmacokinetics of indisulam in each treatment schedule were adequately described using a previously developed population pharmacokinetic model and were mostly consistent with the results of the phase I program. Flow cytometric analysis of endobronchial and metastatic disease revealed a reduction in the fraction of cycling cells and an increase in apoptosis following indisulam compared with pretreatment levels. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, despite evidence of tumor-specific indisulam-induced apoptosis, neither of these treatment schedules has single-agent activity as second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.     

Phase II study of carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Kansai Clinical Oncology Group study

The objective of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel combination chemotherapy in previously untreated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients received paclitaxel at a dose of 70 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, and carboplatin with the target dose of area under the curve (AUC) of 6 on day 1 every 28 days. Forty-six patients were enrolled. A median of four cycles (range, 1-13) were administered. Complete response was observed in one patient (2.2%) and partial response in 23 patients (50%), yielding an overall intent-to-treat response rate of 52.2% (95% confidence interval, 37.8-66.6%). The median survival time was 395 days and 1-year survival rate was 51.4%. Toxicities were mild. Twelve patients (26%) had grade 3 and three patients (7%) had grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was seen in four patients (8%). Massive hematoemesis due to duodenal ulcer was observed in one patient, but no other patients experienced grade 3 or more non-hematological toxicities. There was no treatment-related death. Carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel combination chemotherapy is an efficacious and feasible regimen in patients with advanced NSCLC, and this treatment will be a reasonable alternative to the conventional triweekly regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin.