The Affordable Care Act's insurance market regulations' effect on coverage

Much of the debate surrounding reform of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) revolves around its insurance market regulation. This paper studies the impact on health insurance coverage of those provisions. Using data from the American Community Survey, years 2008–2015, I focus on individuals, ages 26 to 64, who are ineligible for the subsidies or Medicaid expansions included in the ACA to isolate the effect of its market regulation. To account for time trends, I utilize a differences‐in‐differences approach with a control group of residents of Massachusetts who were already subject to a similarly regulated health insurance market. I find that the ACA's regulations caused an increase of 0.95 percentage points in health insurance coverage for my sample in 2014. This increase was concentrated among younger individuals, suggesting that the law's regulations ameliorated adverse selection in the individual health insurance market.     

Preconception subsidized insurance: Prenatal care and birth outcomes by race/ethnicity

Low‐income pregnant women have been Medicaid eligible since the 1980s, but the Affordable Care Act (ACA)'s expansion of Medicaid to women preconception has the potential to improve pregnancy and birth outcomes by removing delays in Medicaid enrollment. More substantially, the ACA expanded subsidized nongroup maternity coverage. Pre‐ACA, nongroup health insurance had generally excluded maternity coverage and was prohibitively expensive for low‐income individuals, but the ACA's creation of the Marketplace made maternity coverage mandatory and provides income‐based subsidies. I use a simulated eligibility approach to measure how these two aspects of the ACA impacted pregnancy and birth outcomes for first‐time mothers, paying special attention to racial‐ethnic differences. I find expanding Medicaid to women prior to pregnancy significantly improves the share of women with a prenatal care visit in the first trimester for non‐Hispanic Whites and Blacks. Expansions in non‐Medicaid subsidized insurance, such as Marketplace insurance, significantly reduce the share of births paid by Medicaid and increased breastfeeding across all racial and ethnic groups. Neither type of subsidized insurance had significant, robust impacts on birth outcomes.     

Impacts of the ACA Medicaid expansion on health behaviors: Evidence from household panel data

A motivation for increasing health insurance coverage is to improve health outcomes for impacted populations. However, health insurance coverage may alternatively increase risky health behaviors due to ex ante moral hazard, and past research on this issue has led to mixed conclusions. This paper uses a panel of household purchases to estimate the effects of the recent state‐level Medicaid expansions resulting from the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on consumption goods that present adverse health risks. We utilize within‐household variation to identify whether increases in Medicaid availability impacted household purchase patterns of alcohol, nicotine‐related, snack food, and carbonated beverage products. Overall, we find little evidence that the ACA Medicaid expansion led to ex ante moral hazard across any of these products, but we find compelling evidence that the Medicaid expansions reduced cigarette consumption and increased smoking cessation product use among the Medicaid‐eligible population.     

Health Insurance Coverage and Mortality Revisited

Objective. To improve understanding of the relationship between lack of insurance and risk of subsequent mortality. Data Sources. Adults who reported being uninsured or privately insured in the National Health Interview Survey from 1986 to 2000 were followed prospectively for mortality from initial interview through 2002. Baseline information was obtained on 672,526 respondents, age 18–64 at the time of the interview. Follow‐up information on vital status was obtained for 643,001 (96 percent) of these respondents, with approximately 5.4 million person‐years of follow‐up. Study Design. Relationships between insurance status and subsequent mortality are examined using Cox proportional hazard survival analysis. Principal Findings. Adjusted for demographic, health status, and health behavior characteristics, the risk of subsequent mortality is no different for uninsured respondents than for those covered by employer‐sponsored group insurance at baseline (hazard ratio 1.03, 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.95–1.12). Omitting health status as a control variable increases the estimated hazard ratio to 1.10 (95 percent CI, 1.03–1.19). Also omitting smoking status and body mass index increases the hazard ratio to 1.20 (95 percent CI, 1.15–1.24). The estimated association between lack of insurance and mortality is not larger among disadvantaged subgroups; when the analysis is restricted to amenable causes of death; when the follow‐up period is shortened (to increase the likelihood of comparing the continuously insured and continuously uninsured); and does not change after people turn 65 and gain Medicare coverage. Conclusions. The Institute of Medicine's estimate that lack of insurance leads to 18,000 excess deaths each year is almost certainly incorrect. It is not possible to draw firm causal inferences from the results of observational analyses, but there is little evidence to suggest that extending insurance coverage to all adults would have a large effect on the number of deaths in the United States.     

The mortality effects of changing public funding for home health care: An empirical analysis of Medicare home health care in the United States

In light of population aging, it is important to understand whether limiting public in‐kind transfers to the elderly affects elderly mortality. I focus on home health care—a popular in‐kind transfer—and I exploit variation in the Medicare home health care reimbursement that arose in 1997 in the United States to study whether cuts to government coverage of home health care affected elderly mortality. Under the identifying assumptions of the DID model, I find that the cuts affected total mortality for some men but not women, suggesting that changes in home health care can affect elderly mortality and differences in mortality between men and women. For men aged between 65 and 74, the Interim Payment System was associated with an increase in mortality equal to 0.6%, an effect in absolute value comparable to the mortality response to a one percentage point change in unemployment rates and within the range of other estimates of the impact of health insurance on elderly mortality.     

Preexisting Condition Protections Under the Affordable Care Act: Changes in Insurance Coverage,Premium Contributions,and Out-of-Pocket Spending

ObjectivesIn January 2014, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) preexisting condition protections prohibited coverage denials, premium increases, and claim denials on the basis of preexisting conditions. This study aimed to examine changes in coverage and premiums and out-of-pocket spending after the implementation of the preexisting condition protections under the ACA.MethodsWe identified adults aged 18 to 64 years with (n = 59 041) and without preexisting conditions (n = 61 970) from the 2011-2013 and 2015-2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We used a difference-in-differences and a difference-in-difference-in-differences approach to assess the associations of preexisting condition protections and changes in insurance coverage, premium contributions, and out-of-pocket spending after the ACA. Simple and multivariable logistic or multivariable 2-part models were fitted for the full sample and stratified by family income (low ≤138% federal poverty level [FPL]; middle 139%-400% FPL; and high > 400 FPL).ResultsThe ACA increased nongroup insurance coverage to a similar extent for individuals with or without preexisting conditions at all income levels. Decreases in premium contributions were observed to a similar extent among families with nongroup private coverage regardless of declinable preexisting condition status, whereas no significant changes were observed among families with group coverage. We found greater decreases in out-of-pocket spending for individuals with preexisting conditions than those without conditions among both individuals covered by nongroup and group insurance, and a greater difference was observed among those covered by nongroup insurance (difference-in-difference-in-differences ?$279; 95% confidence interval ?$528 to ?$29).ConclusionsThe ACA protections were associated with decreases in out-of-pocket spending among adults with preexisting conditions.     

Use of Health Insurance Among Clients Seeking Contraceptive Services at Title X–Funded Facilities in 2016

CONTEXT

As federal initiatives aim to fundamentally alter or dismantle the Affordable Care Act (ACA), evidence regarding the use of insurance among clients obtaining contraceptive care at Title X–funded facilities under ACA guidelines is essential to understanding what is at stake.

METHODS

A nationally representative sample of 2,911 clients seeking contraceptive care at 43 Title X–funded sites in 2016 completed a survey assessing their characteristics and insurance coverage and use. Chi‐square tests for independence with adjustments for the sampling design were conducted to determine differences in insurance coverage and use across demographic characteristics and facility types.

RESULTS

Most clients (71%) had some form of public or private health insurance, and most of these (83%) planned to use it to pay for their services. Foreign‐born clients were less likely than U.S.‐born clients to have coverage (46% vs. 75%) and to use it (78% vs. 85%). Clients with private insurance were less likely than those with public insurance to plan to use their insurance (75% vs. 91%). More than one‐quarter of clients not planning to use existing insurance for services indicated that the reason was that someone might find out.

CONCLUSION

Coverage gaps persist among individuals seeking contraceptive care within the Title X network, despite evidence indicating increases in health insurance coverage among this population since implementation of the ACA. Future research should explore the impact of altering or eliminating the ACA both on the Title X provider network and on the individuals who rely on it.     

Mental Health and Substance Use Care Among Young Adults Before and After Affordable Care Act (ACA) Implementation: A Rural and Urban Comparison

Purpose

Rural young adults experience greater unmet need for mental health (MH) and alcohol or drug (AOD) treatment and lower health insurance coverage than urban residents. It is unknown whether Affordable Care Act (ACA) reforms in 2010 (dependent coverage extended to age 26) or 2014 (Medicaid expansion) closed rural/urban gaps in insurance and treatment. The present study compared changes in rates of health insurance, MH treatment, and AOD treatment for rural and urban young adults over a period of ACA reforms.

Methods

Young adult participants (18‐25 years) in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2008‐2014) with past‐year psychological distress or AOD abuse were included. Difference‐in‐differences logistic regression models estimated rural/urban differences in insurance, MH, and AOD treatment pre‐ versus post‐ACA reforms. Analyses adjusted for gender, race, marital status, and health status.

Results

Among 39,482 young adults with psychological distress or AOD, adjusted insurance rates increased from 72.0% to 81.9% (2008‐2014), but a significant rural/urban difference (5.1%) remained in 2014 (P < .05). Among young adults with psychological distress (n = 23,470), MH treatment rates increased following 2010 reforms from 30.2% to 33.0%, but gains did not continue through 2014. Differences in MH treatment over time did not vary by rural/urban status and there were no significant changes in AOD treatment for either group.

Conclusions

Although rates of insurance increased for all young adults, a significant rural/urban difference persisted in 2014. Meaningful increases in MH and AOD treatment may require targeted efforts to reduce noninsurance barriers to treatment.     

Mortality effects of containing moral hazard: Evidence from disability insurance reform

We exploit an age discontinuity in a Dutch disability insurance reform to identify the health impact of stricter eligibility criteria and reduced generosity. Our results show substantial adverse effects on life expectancy for women subject to the more stringent criteria. A €1,000 reduction in annual benefits leads to a 2.4 percentage points higher probability of death more than 10 years after the reform. This negative health effect is restricted to women with low pre‐disability earnings. We find that the mortality rate of men subject to the stricter rules is reduced by 0.7 percentage points. The evidence for the existence of substantial health effects implies that policymakers considering a disability insurance reform should carefully balance the welfare gains from reduced moral hazard against losses not only from less coverage of income risks but also from deteriorated health.     

Health insurance reform and retirement: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has provided millions of Americans with medical insurance but may have led to an increase in retirement among older individuals who are utilizing the newly available coverage options as a substitute for employer‐provided insurance. Using data from the American Community Survey from 2009–2016, this hypothesis is tested by estimating the effect of the premium subsidies and Medicaid expansions of the ACA on retirement transitions for the non‐Medicare eligible cohort of older Americans aged 55–64. Research results indicate a 2% and 8% decrease in labor force participation resulting from the premium subsidies and Medicaid expansions, respectively. Slightly larger estimates are found among a subgroup of adult couples. The study also finds suggestive evidence of crowd‐out of employer‐sponsored insurance by subsidized marketplace plans but finds no such effects from the Medicaid expansions.     

Not‐for‐profit hospitals and Affordable Care Act: Navigating the new health care landscape

On a sunny Thursday morning, June 25, 2015, President Obama strode into the Rose Garden and declared a victory for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) by stating that the act was working exactly the way it was supposed to work. He further reinforced that ACA has enabled young Americans up to the age of 26 to remain on their parents’ health plans. It disallows the insurance companies from denying coverage based on preexisting conditions. Above all, an expansion of Medicaid has also brought an additional 16 million Americans under health coverage in a span of less than 2 years. The ACA went into full effect on January 1, 2014, ushering in health insurance reforms and new health coverage options across the country. 1 As the states expand Medicaid and provide new coverage options through the federal health insurance marketplace, they are busy streamlining application and enrollment processes for coverage programs. This article highlights the positive impact of the ACA on uninsured and the challenges that not‐for‐profit and public hospitals are facing as they navigate the new health care landscape.     

The effect of the Affordable Care Act preexisting conditions provision on marriage

This paper investigates the effect of the Affordable Care Act preexisting conditions provision on marriage. The policy was implemented to prevent insurers from denying insurance coverage to individuals with preexisting health conditions. We test whether the implementation of the provision led to decreases in marriage among affected adults. We add to earlier work on how marital behavior is influenced by spousal health insurance and examine for the presence of “marriage lock,” a situation in which individuals remain married primarily for insurance. Using longitudinal data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics from 2009 to 2017 and estimating difference‐in‐differences models, we find that male household heads with preexisting conditions are 7.12 percentage points (8.9 percent) less likely to be married after the policy. Using information on insurance status prior to the policy change, we find significant reductions in marriage among individuals with preexisting conditions who were previously insured by spousal health insurance plans. The findings suggest that the inability to attain individual coverage and reliance on spousal insurance provided incentives to remain married before 2014.     

Unintended consequences of health insurance: Affordable Care Act's free contraception mandate and risky sex

Health insurance is a primary driver of rising medical expenditures. Economic theory suggests that insurance induces an increase in risky behaviors, but previous empirical evidence is mixed. I use a mandate in the Affordable Care Act in which contraceptives were covered at zero cost to consumers to test for unintended effects of insurance on risky sex. Leveraging mandated zero cost‐sharing for contraception and pre‐policy insured rates as a measure of treatment intensity, I provide evidence that this 2012 policy reduced fertility but caused unintended consequences: a decline in condom use and a subsequent increase in sexually transmitted infections (STIs). I discuss shortcomings of controlling for nonparallel pre‐trends using state‐trends, and I suggest an alternative to control for pre‐trends directly in the context of dose‐response difference‐in‐differences. Finally, estimates based on the 2010 dependent coverage mandate indicate health insurance provides an overall net positive effect on insurance and STI prevention.     

Health Care Reform and Young Adults' Access to Sexual Health Care: An Exploration of Potential Confidentiality Implications of the Affordable Care Act

One provision of the 2010 Affordable Care Act is extension of dependent coverage for young adults aged up to 26 years on their parent’s private insurance plan. This change, meant to increase insurance coverage for young adults, might yield unintended consequences.Confidentiality concerns may be triggered by coverage through parental insurance, particularly regarding sexual health. The existing literature and our original research suggest that actual or perceived limits to confidentiality could influence the decisions of young adults about whether, and where, to seek care for sexual health issues.Further research is needed on the scope and outcomes of these concerns. Possible remedial actions include enhanced policies to protect confidentiality in billing and mechanisms to communicate confidentiality protections to young adults.ON MARCH 23, 2010, President Barack Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) into law, effecting the most significant change to the US health care system since the creation of the Medicare and Medicaid programs in 1965.1 All components of the health sector are affected: the legislation includes expansions of public coverage, new subsidies for private coverage, health insurance exchanges, insurance coverage requirements and mandates, and strategies to increase the efficiency of health care delivery and rein in health care costs. Such sweeping reforms bring a host of intended changes and potential unforeseen ramifications. One provision of the ACA expands access to dependent coverage for young adults on their parent’s health insurance up to age 26 years, regardless of marital, employment, or educational status, effective September 2010. Previously, the maximum age varied by state, with eligibility for dependent coverage often linked to factors such as educational enrollment status. The government Web site describes the intended benefits of this provision: “By allowing children to stay on their parent''s plan, the Affordable Care Act makes it easier and more affordable for young adults to get health insurance coverage.”2Young adults aged 19 to 26 years have the highest uninsured rate of any age group in the country; 30% were without coverage in 2009.3 The high rate reflects many contributing factors. Young adults are more likely than other working-aged adults to be unemployed; if working, they are more likely to be newly employed, employed in entry-level jobs, and working in part-time positions without access to employer coverage. Furthermore, most young adults do not meet the traditional categorical eligibility requirements for the Medicaid program—the parent of a child younger than 19 years or an aged or disabled individual—and so young adults, even those with very low incomes, seldom qualify for public coverage. The subsequent low levels of insurance result in limited access to care and high levels of unmet need for care.4By expanding access to health insurance coverage, the ACA addresses two Healthy People 2020 goals5: attaining a higher proportion of individuals with insurance and reducing the proportion of individuals who are unable to obtain or who delay obtaining necessary medical care. This provision of the ACA has already shown significant success in expanding health insurance coverage for young adults. The percentage of young people with health insurance increased by 3.8 points from the first quarter of 2010 to the first quarter of 2011, far outstripping gains in other age groups.6 However, the reliance on expanding dependent coverage to address the high levels of uninsured young adults contains the potential for unintended consequences, because concerns about confidentiality could disrupt access to care.     

Uninsured Veterans Who Will Need to Obtain Insurance Coverage Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Objectives. We examined the number and clinical needs of uninsured veterans, including those who will be eligible for the Medicaid expansion and health insurance exchanges in 2014.Methods. We analyzed weighted data for 8710 veterans from the 2010 National Survey of Veterans, classifying it by veterans’ age, income, household size, and insurance status.Results. Of 22 million veterans, about 7%, or more than 1.5 million, were uninsured and will need to obtain coverage by enrolling in US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) care or the Medicaid expansion or by participating in the health insurance exchanges. Of those uninsured, 55%, or more than 800 000, are likely eligible for the Medicaid expansion if states implement it. Compared with veterans with any health coverage, those who were uninsured were younger and more likely to be single, Black, and low income and to have been deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan.Conclusions. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is likely to have a considerable impact on uninsured veterans, which may have implications for the VA, the Medicaid expansion, and the health insurance exchanges.The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)1 represents one of the most significant overhauls of the US health care system and is expected to affect millions of uninsured people across the country. Military veterans constitute a particularly important segment of the population because of their service to the country, access to US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care, and other special benefits after their service. However, little has been written on the potential impact of the ACA on the health and health care of veterans.2 Although the VA operates an integrated national health care system that offers free or low-cost services to eligible veterans, many veterans are not enrolled in VA health care, and some are ineligible. Enrollment in VA health care satisfies the ACA’s requirement for insurance coverage, but eligibility for VA health care is determined on the basis of a complex system of priorities, mostly based on service-connected disability, income, and age, and it generally requires a military service discharge that is other than dishonorable (i.e., honorable, general).One study estimated that only 13% (3.6 million) of veterans report receiving some or all of their health care at the VA, and the vast majority (> 20 million) receive no health care from the VA.3 Most veterans thus rely on non-VA health care and are covered by various private or other public forms of health insurance, including Medicare and Medicaid. A small, albeit important, minority of veterans have no health insurance coverage. Estimates based on data from 1987 to 2004 showed that 7.7% of veterans were uninsured (including having no VA coverage), which equates to nearly 1.8 million veterans and represents 4.7% of all uninsured US residents.4Lack of health insurance coverage is an important problem because it can hinder access to effective health care, including needed medical visits, preventive care, and other services, and it can ultimately lead to poor health, premature mortality, and high medical costs.5,6 Being uninsured is a growing problem in the United States that the ACA addresses by requiring virtually all legal US residents to have health insurance. The ACA includes various provisions to help US residents, including veterans, accomplish this.One major provision that is optional for states to implement is the expansion of Medicaid coverage to all individuals aged 18 to 65 years with incomes at or below 138% of the federal poverty level. Although not all states will implement this expansion, and the number of participating states is currently unknown, many poor, uninsured adults will be able to obtain Medicaid coverage in states that implement the Medicaid expansion. Uninsured adults who have incomes above the Medicaid expansion limit or who live in states that do not implement the Medicaid expansion will have to purchase health insurance and may participate in the health insurance exchanges.A second major provision of the ACA is the creation of health insurance exchanges in each state whereby individuals may purchase competitive health insurance plans that are eligible for federal subsidies, but those subsidies are only available to those with income above the federal poverty level. Both of these major ACA provisions are planned for implementation in 2014 and will introduce a variety of coverage options for US residents, including veterans.There has been little study of uninsured veterans and no study of the potential impact of the ACA on veterans in general. Moreover, most data that exist on veterans are based on VA data, which only contain information about veterans who use VA health services and do not include information about those who are uninsured or not covered by VA health care. However, 1 population-based study7 has provided some evidence that a substantial number of veterans are uninsured (particularly those younger than 65 years) and that many uninsured veterans are in poor health, often forego needed health care because of costs, and have equal or worse access to health care than other uninsured adults in the general population. As the country moves toward a new era of health care with the ACA and continues to engage in conflicts in the Middle East, the impact of the ACA on the health care of veterans needs to be considered.We used a recent nationally representative survey of veterans to (1) describe the proportion and characteristics of veterans who are currently uninsured because they will likely be required to obtain coverage under the ACA; (2) determine, among those who are uninsured, who will likely be eligible for the Medicaid expansion; and (3) compare the sociodemographic and health characteristics of those who are uninsured and likely eligible for Medicaid expansion (LEME), those who are uninsured and not LEME, and those who currently have health insurance coverage. The results provide information about the number and health characteristics of veterans who will likely be affected by different provisions of the ACA and inform planning efforts for the VA and states that implement the Medicaid expansion and health insurance exchanges.     

Spillover Effects of the Affordable Care Act? Exploring the Impact on Young Adult Dental Insurance Coverage

ObjectivesTo assess whether the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) dependent coverage health insurance mandate had a spillover impact on young adult dental insurance coverage and whether any observed effects varied by household income.DataMedical Expenditure Panel Surveys from 2006 through 2011.ResultsPrivate dental insurance increased by 6.7 percentage points among young adults compared to a control group of 27–30-year olds. Increases were concentrated at middle-income levels (125–400 percent FPL).ConclusionsThe dependent coverage mandate provision of the Affordable Care Act has not only increased health insurance rates among young adults but also dental insurance coverage rates.     

Health reform under the patient protection and Affordable Care Act: characteristics of exchange-based health insurance enrollees

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) reformed and expanded healthcare coverage with an exchange-based health insurance program. While millions of Americans have benefited from enrollment in ACA marketplace insurance plans, many individuals are likely to be affected by potential future policy changes. Since few studies on the features of marketplace enrollees exist, we adopted a retrospective, cross-sectional study design using 2016 National Health Interview data to identify sociodemographic and health characteristics of enrollees, comparing them to those without insurance. Chi-square tests and logistic regression examined factors associated with enrollees. Adults with multiple chronic diseases (AOR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.44, 2.50), a history of smoking (AOR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.82, 3.26), females, married, age 50–64 years, higher educational attainment, and retirees (AOR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.06, 3.27) were more likely to be enrollees. Since enrollees are largely higher risk individuals with greater healthcare needs, policies that modify the ACA should take these factors into account to reduce potential adverse impacts on enrollees.