Belatacept and Sirolimus Prolong Nonhuman Primate Renal Allograft Survival Without a Requirement for Memory T Cell Depletion

Belatacept is an inhibitor of CD28/B7 costimulation that is clinically indicated as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) alternative in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids after renal transplantation. We sought to develop a clinically translatable, nonlymphocyte depleting, belatacept‐based regimen that could obviate the need for both CNIs and steroids. Thus, based on murine data showing synergy between costimulation blockade and mTOR inhibition, we studied rhesus monkeys undergoing MHC‐mismatched renal allotransplants treated with belatacept and the mTOR inhibitor, sirolimus. To extend prior work on costimulation blockade‐resistant rejection, some animals also received CD2 blockade with alefacept (LFA3‐Ig). Belatacept and sirolimus therapy successfully prevented rejection in all animals. Tolerance was not induced, as animals rejected after withdrawal of therapy. The regimen did not deplete T cells. Alefecept did not add a survival benefit to the optimized belatacept and sirolimus regimen, despite causing an intended depletion of memory T cells, and caused a marked reduction in regulatory T cells. Furthermore, alefacept‐treated animals had a significantly increased incidence of CMV reactivation, suggesting that this combination overly compromised protective immunity. These data support belatacept and sirolimus as a clinically translatable, nondepleting, CNI‐free, steroid‐sparing immunomodulatory regimen that promotes sustained rejection‐free allograft survival after renal transplantation.     

Belatacept and Sirolimus Prolong Nonhuman Primate Islet Allograft Survival: Adverse Consequences of Concomitant Alefacept Therapy

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and steroids are known to promote insulin resistance, and their avoidance after islet transplantation is preferred from a metabolic standpoint. Belatacept, a B7‐specific mediator of costimulation blockade (CoB), is clinically indicated as a CNI alternative in renal transplantation, and we have endeavored to develop a clinically translatable, belatacept‐based regimen that could obviate the need for both CNIs and steroids. Based on the known synergy between CoB and mTOR inhibition, we studied rhesus monkeys undergoing MHC‐mismatched islet allotransplants treated with belatacept and the mTOR inhibitor, sirolimus. To extend prior work on CoB‐resistant rejection, some animals also received CD2 blockade with alefacept (LFA3‐Ig). Nine rhesus macaques were rendered diabetic with streptozotocin and underwent islet allotransplantation. All received belatacept and sirolimus; six also received alefacept. Belatacept and sirolimus significantly prolonged rejection‐free graft survival (median 225 days compared to 8 days in controls receiving basiliximab and sirolimus; p = 0.022). The addition of alefacept provided no additional survival benefit, but was associated with Cytomegalovirus reactivation in four of six animals. No recipients produced donor‐specific alloantibodies. The combination of belatacept and sirolimus successfully prevents islet allograft survival in rhesus monkeys, but induction with alefacept provides no survival benefit and increases the risk of viral reactivation.     

De novo belatacept in clinical vascularized composite allotransplantation

Most immunosuppressive regimens used in clinical vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) have been calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)‐based. As such, most recipients have experienced CNI‐related side effects. Costimulation blockade, specifically CD28/B7 inhibition with belatacept, has emerged as a clinical replacement for CNI‐based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. We have previously shown that belatacept can be used as a centerpiece immunosuppressant for VCA in nonhuman primates, and subsequently reported successful conversion from a CNI‐based regimen to a belatacept‐based regimen after clinical hand transplantation. We now report on the case of a hand transplant recipient, whom we have successfully treated with a de novo belatacept‐based regimen, transitioned to a CNI–free regimen. This case demonstrates that belatacept can provide sufficient prophylaxis from rejection without chronic CNI‐associated side effects, a particularly important goal in nonlifesaving solid organ transplants such as VCA.     

Selective Targeting of Human Alloresponsive CD8+ Effector Memory T Cells Based on CD2 Expression

Costimulation blockade (CoB), specifically CD28/B7 inhibition with belatacept, is an emerging clinical replacement for calcineurin inhibitor‐based immunosuppression in allotransplantation. However, there is accumulating evidence that belatacept incompletely controls alloreactive T cells that lose CD28 expression during terminal differentiation. We have recently shown that the CD2‐specific fusion protein alefacept controls costimulation blockade‐resistant allograft rejection in nonhuman primates. Here, we have investigated the relationship between human alloreactive T cells, costimulation blockade sensitivity and CD2 expression to determine whether these findings warrant potential clinical translation. Using polychromatic flow cytometry, we found that CD8⁺ effector memory T cells are distinctly high CD2 and low CD28 expressors. Alloresponsive CD8⁺CD2^hiCD28^? T cells contained the highest proportion of cells with polyfunctional cytokine (IFNγ, TNF and IL‐2) and cytotoxic effector molecule (CD107a and granzyme B) expression capability. Treatment with belatacept in vitro incompletely attenuated allospecific proliferation, but alefacept inhibited belatacept‐resistant proliferation. These results suggest that highly alloreactive effector T cells exert their late stage functions without reliance on ongoing CD28/B7 costimulation. Their high CD2 expression increases their susceptibility to alefacept. These studies combined with in vivo nonhuman primate data provide a rationale for translation of an immunosuppression regimen pairing alefacept and belatacept to human renal transplantation.     

Tacrolimus to Belatacept Conversion Following Hand Transplantation: A Case Report

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has emerged as a viable limb replacement strategy for selected patients with upper limb amputation. However, allograft rejection has been seen in essentially all reported VCA recipients indicating a requirement for substantial immunosuppressive therapy. Calcineurin inhibitors have served as the centerpiece agent in all reported cases, and CNI‐associated complications associated with the broad therapeutic effects and side effects of calcineurin inhibitors have been similarly common. Recently, belatacept has been approved as a calcineurin inhibitor replacement in kidney transplantation, but to date, its use in VCA has not been reported. Herein, we report on the case of a hand transplant recipient who developed recurrent acute rejection with alloantibody formation and concomitant calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, all of which resolved upon conversion from a maintenance regimen of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids to belatacept and sirolimus. This case indicates that belatacept may be a reasonable maintenance immunosuppressive alternative for use in VCA, providing sufficient prophylaxis from rejection with a reduced side effect profile, the latter being particularly relevant for nonlife threatening conditions typically treated by VCA.     

Challenges of calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal following combined pancreas and kidney transplantation: Results of a prospective,randomized clinical trial

In a phase 2 multicenter open‐label randomized trial sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, simultaneous pancreas‐kidney (SPK) recipients were randomized to a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)–based immunosuppressive regimen (tacrolimus) (n = 21), or an investigational arm using low‐dose CNI plus costimulation blockade (belatacept) with intended CNI withdrawal (n = 22). Both arms included induction therapy with rabbit ATG, mycophenolate sodium, or mycophenolate mofetil and rapid withdrawal of steroids. Enrollment and CNI withdrawal were stopped after 43/60 planned subjects had been enrolled. At that time, the rate of biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) of the pancreas was low in both groups until CNI was withdrawn, with four of the five pancreas rejections occurring during or after CNI withdrawal. The rate of BPAR of kidney allografts was low in both control (9.5%) and investigational (9.1%) arms. Pancreas graft survival at 52 weeks, defined by insulin independence, was 21 (100%) in the control group and 19 (86%) in the investigational arm. One subject in the investigational arm died with functioning pancreas and kidney grafts. Renal function at week 52 was similar in both arms. Costimulation blockade with belatacept did not provide sufficient immunosuppression to reliably prevent pancreas rejection in SPK transplants undergoing CNI withdrawal.     

Secondary lymphoid tissue and costimulation‐blockade resistant rejection: A nonhuman primate renal transplant study

Naïve T cell activation requires antigen presentation combined with costimulation through CD28, both of which optimally occur in secondary lymphoid tissues such as lymph nodes and the spleen. Belatacept impairs CD28 costimulation by binding its ligands, CD80 and CD86, and in doing so, impairs de novo alloimmune responses. However, in most patients belatacept is ineffective in preventing allograft rejection when used as a monotherapy, and adjuvant therapy is required for control of costimulation‐blockade resistant rejection (CoBRR). In rodent models, impaired access to secondary lymphoid tissues has been demonstrated to reduce alloimmune responses to vascularized allografts. Here we show that surgical maneuvers, lymphatic ligation, and splenectomy, designed to anatomically limit access to secondary lymphoid tissues, control CoBRR and facilitate belatacept monotherapy in a nonhuman primate model of kidney transplantation without adjuvant immunotherapy. We further demonstrate that animals sustained on belatacept monotherapy progressively develop an increasingly naïve T and B cell repertoire, an effect that is accelerated by splenectomy and lost at the time of belatacept withdrawal and rejection. These pilot data inform the role of secondary lymphoid tissues on the development of CoBRR and the use of costimulation molecule–focused therapies.     

The Effect of Costimulatory and Interleukin 2 Receptor Blockade on Regulatory T Cells in Renal Transplantation

Regulatory T cells (Treg) are critical regulators of immune tolerance. Both IL‐2 and CD28‐CD80/CD86 signaling are critical for CD4⁺CD25⁺FOXP3⁺ Treg survival in mice. Yet, both belatacept (a second‐generation CTLA‐4Ig) and basiliximab (an anti‐CD25 monoclonal antibody) are among the arsenal of current immunotherapies being used in kidney transplant patients. In this study, we explored the direct effect of basiliximab and belatacept on the Tregs in peripheral blood both in the short term and long term and in kidney biopsies of patients with acute rejection. We report that the combined belatacept/basiliximab therapy has no long‐term effect on circulating Tregs when compared to a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)‐treated group. Moreover, belatacept‐treated patients had a significantly greater number of FOXP3⁺ T cells in graft biopsies during acute rejection as compared to CNI‐treated patients. Finally, it appears that the basiliximab caused a transient loss of both FOXP3⁺ and FOXP3^? CD25⁺ T cells in the circulation in both treatment groups raising important questions about the use of this therapy in tolerance promoting therapeutic protocols.     

Costimulatory blockade with mTor inhibition abrogates effector T‐cell responses allowing regulatory T‐cell survival in renal transplantation

The advent of novel immunosuppressive strategies in renal transplantation, with immunomodulatory properties, might facilitate long‐term allograft survival. T‐cell depletion, costimulation‐blockade and mTor inhibition have been shown to favour anti‐donor hyporesponsiveness. Recently, the combination of rATG, belatacept (Bela) and sirolimus (SRL) has been used in kidney transplantation, showing very low incidence of acute rejection and excellent 12‐month graft and patient survival. Herein, we have analysed the 1‐year evolution of memory/effector and regulatory T cells and assessed the donor‐specific T‐cell alloimmune response in a group of these patients and compared with others treated with a calcineurin‐inhibitor(CNI)‐based (rATG/tacrolimus/MMF), and two other Bela‐based regimens (rATG/Bela/MMF and basiliximab/Bela/MMF/steroids). During the first year after transplantation, patients receiving rATG/Bela/SRL had significantly higher percentage of Tregs upon the memory T‐cell compartment and showed a potent anti‐donor suppressive activity. In an in vitro naive and memory/effector T‐cell co‐culture, the combination of costimulation‐blockade and SRL could abrogate both antigen‐specific T‐cell responses as efficiently as using a CNI drug. The combination of T‐cell depletion, costimulation‐blockade and mTor inhibition seems to be able to allow Treg survival and inhibit donor‐specific alloreactive effector immune responses after kidney transplantation in humans.     

Abatacept as rescue immunosuppression after calcineurin inhibitor treatment failure in renal transplantation

A majority of kidney transplant recipients receive calcineurin inhibitor‐based immunosuppression. However, some do not tolerate calcineurin inhibitors and require other immunosuppressive strategies. Until recently, alternative approaches have been associated with inferior outcomes, but recent methods have effectively utilized belatacept in calcineurin inhibitor‐intolerant patients. Though promising, belatacept uptake has been limited by higher acute rejection rates, unavailability due to production shortages, and logistical challenges as a result of intravenous infusion requirements. Interestingly, its predecessor abatacept is clinically available in subcutaneous formulation to treat autoimmune disorders but has not been used in clinical transplantation. Here we report on a series of 9 calcineurin inhibitor‐intolerant transplant recipients converted to abatacept early after transplant as rescue immunosuppression during periods of belatacept unavailability. Retrospective review revealed successful allograft salvage and 100% patient and graft survival (median 115 months) after conversion to abatacept. Patients received abatacept for a median duration of 82 months with stable, long‐term renal allograft function, a single cellular rejection episode, and no clinically apparent protective immunity concerns. Hence our findings suggest that future clinical studies utilizing abatacept either de novo or as conversion therapy in transplant recipients should be considered.     

Belatacept‐Resistant Rejection Is Associated With CD28+ Memory CD8 T Cells

Recently, newer therapies have been designed to more specifically target rejection in an effort to improve efficacy and limit unwanted toxicity. Belatacept, a CD28‐CD80/86 specific reagent, is associated with superior patient survival and graft function compared with traditional therapy, but its adoption as a mainstay immunosuppressive therapy has been tempered by increased rejection rates. It is essential that the underlying mechanisms associated with this rejection be elucidated before belatacept is more widely used. To that end, we designed a study in a nonhuman primate kidney transplant model where animals were treated with either a belatacept‐ or a tacrolimus‐based immunosuppressive regimen. Interestingly, we found that elevated pretransplant frequencies of CD28⁺CD8⁺T_EMRA cells are associated with rejection on belatacept but not tacrolimus treatment. Further analysis showed that the CD28⁺CD8⁺T_EMRA cells rapidly lose CD28 expression after transplant in those animals that go on to reject with the allograft infiltrate being predominantly CD28^?. These data suggest that CD28⁺ memory T cells may be resistant to belatacept, capable of further differentiation including loss of CD28 expression while maintaining effector function. The unique signaling requirements of CD28⁺ memory T cells provide opportunities for the development of targeted therapies, which may synergize with belatacept to prevent costimulation‐independent rejection.     

Complete Regression of Psoriatic Arthritis After Belatacept Conversion in a Highly HLA‐Sensitized Kidney Transplant Patient

Costimulatory inhibitors (i.e. abatacept and belatacept) effectively abrogate T lymphocyte activation and proliferation and have been shown to be effective for disease control in certain autoimmune disorders as well as in preventing allograft rejection in kidney transplantation. Whether such immunomodulatory agents may be useful for the control of autoimmune flares and allograft acceptance, while avoiding the need of additional strong immunosuppressants, has not been shown. Here, we report the first case of a 47‐year‐old man affected by a serious debilitating form of psoriatic arthritis that presented during the course of a third, high immunological‐risk kidney transplantation. Three years after transplantation, the patient benefited by switching from tacrolimus‐ to belatacept‐based therapy, without additional immunosuppression, by showing complete regression of the arthritic symptoms as well as no progression of severe radiological lesions, which leaded to the recovery of disability and functional impairment. Remarkably, the treatment with belatacept in association with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids also provided a stable normal allograft function over time and abrogated the development of de novo circulating donor‐specific alloantibodies after 4 years of follow‐up.     

Selective Targeting of High‐Affinity LFA‐1 Does Not Augment Costimulation Blockade in a Nonhuman Primate Renal Transplantation Model

Costimulation blockade (CoB) via belatacept is a lower‐morbidity alternative to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)‐based immunosuppression. However, it has higher rates of early acute rejection. These early rejections are mediated in part by memory T cells, which have reduced dependence on the pathway targeted by belatacept and increased adhesion molecule expression. One such molecule is leukocyte function antigen (LFA)‐1. LFA‐1 exists in two forms: a commonly expressed, low‐affinity form and a transient, high‐affinity form, expressed only during activation. We have shown that antibodies reactive with LFA‐1 regardless of its configuration are effective in eliminating memory T cells but at the cost of impaired protective immunity. Here we test two novel agents, leukotoxin A and AL‐579, each of which targets the high‐affinity form of LFA‐1, to determine whether this more precise targeting prevents belatacept‐resistant rejection. Despite evidence of ex vivo and in vivo ligand‐specific activity, neither agent when combined with belatacept proved superior to belatacept monotherapy. Leukotoxin A approached a ceiling of toxicity before efficacy, while AL‐579 failed to significantly alter the peripheral immune response. These data, and prior studies, suggest that LFA‐1 blockade may not be a suitable adjuvant agent for CoB‐resistant rejection.     

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitor–based immunosuppression to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors or belatacept in renal transplant recipients

The calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) remain the standard of care for maintenance immunosuppression following renal transplantation. CNIs have demonstrated their effectiveness in reducing acute cellular rejection; however, some evidence suggests that these compounds negatively affect native renal function and are associated with allograft injury in renal transplant recipients. CNIs have also been linked with hypertension, new‐onset diabetes after transplantation, tremor, and thrombotic microangiopathy, which have significant consequences for long‐term allograft function and patient health overall. Thus, converting patients to a non‐CNI‐based regimen may improve renal function and also provide extrarenal benefits. A number of studies have been conducted that explore CNI conversion strategies in renal transplant recipients in an effort to improve long‐term allograft function and survival. These include converting to alternative, non‐nephrotoxic, maintenance immunosuppressants, such as the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus) and the costimulation blocker belatacept. In this review of literature, evidence for the potential renal and extrarenal benefits of conversion to these non‐CNI‐based regimens is evaluated. Clinical challenges, including the adverse event profiles of non‐CNI‐based regimens and the selection of candidates for conversion, are also examined.     

Safe Conversion From Tacrolimus to Belatacept in High Immunologic Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients With Allograft Dysfunction

There is no literature on the use of belatacept for sensitized patients or regrafts in kidney transplantation. We present our initial experience in high immunologic risk kidney transplant recipients who were converted from tacrolimus to belatacept for presumed acute calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity and/or interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy. Six (mean age = 40 years) patients were switched from tacrolimus to belatacept at a median of 4 months posttransplant. Renal function improved significantly from a peak mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 23.8 ± 12.9 mL/min/1.73 m² prior to the switch to an eGFR of 42 ± 12.5 mL/min/1.73 m² (p = 0.03) at a mean follow‐up of 16.5 months postconversion. No new rejection episodes were diagnosed despite a prior history of rejection in 2/6 (33%) patients. Surveillance biopsies performed in 5/6 patients did not show subclinical rejection. No development of donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) was noted. In this preliminary investigation, we report improved kidney function without a concurrent increase in risk of rejection and DSA in six sensitized patients converted from tacrolimus to belatacept. Improvement in renal function was noted even in patients with chronic allograft fibrosis without evidence of acute CNI toxicity. Further studies with protocol biopsies are needed to ensure safety and wider applicability of this approach.     

Effect of an Early Switch to Belatacept Among Calcineurin Inhibitor–Intolerant Graft Recipients of Kidneys From Extended‐Criteria Donors

Transplant recipients receiving a kidney from an extended‐criteria donor (ECD) are exposed to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity, as demonstrated by severe delayed graft function and/or a low GFR. Belatacept is a nonnephrotoxic drug that is indicated as an alternative to CNIs. We reported 25 cases of conversion from a CNI to belatacept due to CNI intolerance within the first 6 mo after transplantation. The mean age of the recipients was 59 years, and 24 of 25 patients received ECD kidneys. At the date of the medication switch, 12 of 25 patients displayed a calculated GFR (cGFR) <15 mL/min, six patients remained on dialysis, and the biopsies showed evidence of acute tubular damage associated with severe vascular or tubulointerstitial chronic lesions. Three patients did not recover renal function, and three patients died during the follow‐up period. Among the remaining patients, renal function improved: The cGFR was 18.28 ± 12.3 mL/min before the medication switch compared with 34.9 ± 14.5 mL/min at 1 year after conversion to belatacept (p = 0.002). Tolerance of and compliance with belatacept were good, and only one patient experienced acute rejection. Belatacept is an effective therapy that preserves renal function in kidney transplant patients who are intolerant of CNIs.     

Belatacept: from rational design to clinical application

Gradually improved immunosuppression has contributed significantly to the progress achieved in transplantation medicine so far. Nevertheless, current drug regimens are associated with late graft loss – in particular as a result of immunologic damage or drug toxicity – and substantial morbidity. Recently, the costimulation blocker belatacept (marketed under the name Nulojix^®) has been approved for immunosuppression in renal transplantation. Belatacept (a mutated version of CTLA4Ig) is a fusion protein rationally designed to block CD28, a critical activating receptor on T cells, by binding and saturating its ligands B7‐1 and B7‐2. In phase II and III trials, belatacept was compared with cyclosporine (in combination with basiliximab, MMF, and steroids). Advantages observed with belatacept include superior graft function, preservation of renal structure and improved cardiovascular risk profile. Concerns associated with belatacept are a higher frequency of cellular rejection episodes and more post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) cases especially in EBV seronegative patients, who should be excluded from belatacept‐based regimens. Thus, after almost three decades of calcineurin inhibitors as mainstay of immunosuppression, belatacept offers a potential alternative. In this article, we will provide an overview of belatacept’s preclinical development and will discuss the available evidence from clinical trials.     

Induction Therapy for Kidney Transplant Recipients: Do We Still Need Anti‐IL2 Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies?

Induction therapy with antilymphocyte biological agents is widely used after kidney transplantation, most commonly T lymphocyte‐depleting rabbit‐derived antithymocyte globulin (rATG) or an IL‐2 receptor antagonist (IL2RA). Early randomized trials showed that rATG or IL2RA induction reduces early acute rejection, prompting recommendations by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes that IL2RA induction be used routinely in first‐line therapy after kidney transplantation, with lymphocyte‐depleting induction reserved for high‐risk cases. These studies, however, mainly used outdated maintenance regimens. No large randomized trial has examined the effect of IL2RA or rATG induction versus no induction in patients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid and steroids. With this triple maintenance therapy, the addition of induction may achieve an absolute risk reduction for acute rejection of only 1–4% in standard‐risk patients without improving graft or patient survival. In contrast, rATG induction lowers the relative risk of acute rejection by almost 50% versus IL2RA in patients with high immunological risk. These recent data raise questions about the need for IL2RA in kidney transplantation, as it may no longer be beneficial in standard‐risk transplantation and may be inferior to rATG in high‐risk situations. Updated evidence‐based guidelines are necessary to support clinicians deciding whether and what induction therapy is required for their transplant patients today.