Quadritherapy vs standard tritherapy immunosuppressant regimen after heart transplantation: A propensity score–matched cohort analysis

After heart transplant, adding everolimus (EVL) to standard immunosuppressive regimen mostly relies on converting calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) into EVL. The aim of this study was to describe the effects of combining low‐dose EVL and CNIs in maintenance immunosuppression regimen (quadritherapy) and compare it with standard tritherapy associating standard‐dose CNIs, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. In the 3‐year registry cohort of heart transplanted patients, those who received quadritherapy were compared with those who received tritherapy. EVL was added after 3 months posttransplant. Three analyses were performed to control for confounders: propensity score matching, multivariable survival, and inverse probability score weighting analyses. Among 213 patients who were included (75 with quadritherapy), propensity score matching selected 64 unique pairs of patients with similar characteristics. In the matched cohort (n = 128), quadritherapy was associated with fewer deaths (3 [4.7%] vs 17 [21.9%], P = .007) and biopsy‐proven acute rejections (15 [23.4%] vs 31 [48.4%], P = .002). These results were confirmed in the overall cohort (n = 213), after multivariable and inverse probability score weighting analyses. Renal function and donor‐specific HLA‐antibodies remained similar in both groups. Low‐dose combination quadritherapy was associated with fewer deaths and rejections, compared with standard immunosuppression tritherapy.     

Clinical significance of lactate clearance for the development of early allograft dysfunction and short‐term prognosis in deceased donor liver transplantation

This retrospective study evaluated lactate clearance (LC), measured at 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after reperfusion, as a predictor of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and short‐term outcomes in patients receiving deceased donor liver transplantation. Of 181 transplant recipients, 44 (24.3%) developed EAD and had lower LCs than those who did not develop EAD. A receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that LC determined at 6 hours showed the highest area under curve value of 0.828 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.755‐0.990) for predicting the development of EAD at a cutoff value of 25.8% with 76.7% sensitivity and 77.9% specificity. LC values that fell below the cutoff values were significantly associated with EAD in a multivariate analysis, with values at 6 hours having the highest adjusted odds ratio (11.891, 95% CI: 4.469‐31.639). In‐hospital and 6 month mortalities were higher in patients with LC values below the cutoffs compared with those above the cutoff values at each time point. Thus, LC calculated shortly after reperfusion of an allograft is significantly discriminative for the development of EAD and is associated with short‐term prognosis after deceased donor liver transplantation.     

Model for early allograft function is predictive of early graft loss in donation after circulatory death liver transplantation

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation is associated with higher rates of graft loss. In this paper, we explored whether the Model for Early Allograft Function (MEAF) predicted outcome in DCD liver transplantation. We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from all adult DCD (Maastricht 3) livers transplanted in Cambridge and Edinburgh between 1 January 2011 and 30 June 2017, excluding those undergoing any form of machine perfusion. 187 DCD liver transplants were performed during the study period. DCD liver transplants with a lower MEAF score had a significantly better survival compared to those with a high MEAF score (Mantel-Cox P < .0001); this was largely due to early graft loss. Beyond 28 days post-transplant, there were no significant long-term graft or patient survival differences irrespective of the grade of MEAF (Mantel-Cox P = .64 and P = .43, respectively). The MEAF score correlated with the length of ICU (P = .0011) and hospital stay (P = .0007), but did not predict the requirement for retransplantation for ischemic cholangiopathy (P = .37) or readmission (P = .74). In this study, a high MEAF score predicted early graft loss, but not the subsequent need for re-transplantation or late graft failure as a result of intrahepatic ischemic bile duct pathology.     

Post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease in lung transplantation: A nested case‐control study

Post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) may compromise long‐term outcome of lung transplant (LTx) recipients. A case‐control study was performed, comparing LTx recipients with PTLD (n=31) to matched recipients without PTLD (Controls, n=62). Risk factors for PTLD and post‐transplant outcomes were assessed. PTLD prevalence was 3.9%, time to PTLD 323 (166‐1132) days; and 54.8% had early‐onset PTLD versus 45.2% late‐onset PTLD. At LTx, more Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV)‐seronegative patients were present in PTLD (42%) compared to Controls (5%) (P<.0001); most of whom had undergone EBV seroconversion upon PTLD diagnosis. EBV viral load was higher in PTLD versus Controls (P<.0001). Overall, lower hemoglobin and higher C‐reactive protein levels were present in PTLD versus Controls (P<.0001). EBV status at LTx (P=.0073) and EBV viral load at PTLD (P=.0002) were the most important risk determinates for later PTLD. Patients with PTLD demonstrated shorter time to onset of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) (P=.0006) and poorer 5‐year survival post‐LTx (66.6% versus 91.5%), resulting in worse CLAD‐free survival (HR 2.127, 95%CI 1.006‐4.500; P=.0483) and overall survival (HR 3.297 95%CI 1.473‐7.382; P=.0037) compared to Controls. Late‐onset PTLD had worse survival compared to early‐onset PTLD (P=.021). Primary EBV infection is a risk for PTLD; which is associated with worse long‐term outcome post‐LTx.     

Impact of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy on invasive lobular carcinoma: A propensity score‐matched analysis of SEER data

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) has a different treatment response from invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We assessed whether perioperative chemotherapy was associated with improved prognosis in patients with ILC. Retrospective data of women who underwent surgery for ILC were extracted from the SEER database. Subjects were divided into non‐chemotherapy and chemotherapy groups. Overall, 10 537 patients were included, and 2107 patients were stratified into each group after propensity score matching. Perioperative chemotherapy significantly improved 10‐year survival rates for ILC, particularly in patients with large tumor size and lymph node metastases. Perioperative chemotherapy is effective for ILC patients with proper selection.     

The impact of direct‐acting antiviral agents on liver and kidney transplant costs and outcomes

Direct‐acting antiviral medications (DAAs) have revolutionized care for hepatitis C positive (HCV+) liver (LT) and kidney (KT) transplant recipients. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients registry data were integrated with national pharmaceutical claims (2007‐2016) to identify HCV treatments before January 2014 (pre‐DAA) and after (post‐DAA), stratified by donor (D) and recipient (R) serostatus and payer. Pre‐DAA, 18% of HCV+ LT recipients were treated within 3 years and without differences by donor serostatus or payer. Post‐DAA, only 6% of D‐/R+ recipients, 19.8% of D+/R+ recipients with public insurance, and 11.3% with private insurance were treated within 3 years (P < .0001). LT recipients treated for HCV pre‐DAA experienced higher rates of graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] _1.341.85_2.10, P < .0001) and death (aHR _1.471.68_1.91, P < .0001). Post‐DAA, HCV treatment was not associated with death (aHR _0.340.67_1.32, P = .25) or graft failure (aHR _0.320.64_1.26, P = .20) in D+R+ LT recipients. Treatment increased in D+R+ KT recipients (5.5% pre‐DAA vs 12.9% post‐DAA), but did not differ by payer status. DAAs reduced the risk of death after D+/R+ KT by 57% (_0.190.43_0.95, P = .04) and graft loss by 46% (_0.270.54_1.07, P = .08). HCV treatment with DAAs appears to improve HCV+ LT and KT outcomes; however, access to these medications appears limited in both LT and KT recipients.     

Impact of imbalanced graft‐to‐spleen volume ratio on outcomes following living donor liver transplantation in an era when simultaneous splenectomy is not typically indicated

The impact of an imbalanced graft‐to‐spleen volume ratio (GSVR) on posttransplant outcomes other than postreperfusion portal hypertension remains unknown. The importance of GSVR might vary according to whether simultaneous splenectomy (SPX) is performed. This retrospective study divided 349 living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients from 2006 to 2017 into 2 groups: low GSVR (≤0.70 g/mL) and normal GSVR (>0.70 g/mL). The cutoff value of GSVR was set based on the first quartile of the distributed data. Graft survival and associations with various clinical factors were investigated between the groups according to whether SPX was performed. Low GSVR did not affect outcomes when SPX was performed. In contrast, it was associated with an increased incidence of early graft loss (EGL) and poor graft survival by presenting posttransplant thrombocytopenia, cholestasis, coagulopathy, and massive ascites when the spleen was preserved. Among patients with a preserved spleen, the multivariable analysis results revealed that older donor age and low GSVR were independent risk factors for graft loss. In conclusion, low GSVR was an independent predictor of graft loss after LDLT when the spleen was preserved. Preserved spleen with extremely low GSVR may be related to persistent hypersplenism, impaired graft function, and consequent EGL.