Alliance and outcome in late-life depression

Older adults who met criteria for major depressive disorder were randomly assigned to behavioral, cognitive, or brief dynamic therapy. Symptoms were equally reduced across the three treatment conditions. Early in treatment, alliance ratings were obtained from both therapists and patients and were related to outcome. We calculated one therapist alliance composite score and five patient alliance factor scores. In general, no agreement was found between therapists' and patients' judgments of alliance. Levels of alliance were found to be not significantly different across the three treatment conditions. For the sample as a whole, only the patient factor of Patient Commitment was found to be associated with depressive symptoms after treatment, with the strongest findings in the cognitive therapy condition. The Patient Commitment factor uniquely contributed to outcome over and above the contribution of initial symptomatology and symptomatic change at midpoint in therapy. Expected trends of association with outcome were observed for the therapist alliance composite score in brief dynamic therapy and for the patient factor of Patient Working Capacity in both cognitive and brief dynamic therapy. Findings are discussed in terms of their theoretical and clinical implications.     

Do baseline client characteristics predict the therapeutic alliance in the treatment of schizophrenia?

This study examined clinical predictors of client and therapist alliance ratings early in therapy, the relationship between client and therapist alliance ratings, and the psychometric properties of the Working Alliance Inventory in individuals with schizophrenia receiving manual-based treatment. Assessment of clinical symptoms and social functioning were conducted at baseline, and alliance ratings were obtained at 5 weeks. The Working Alliance Inventory had high internal consistency, but there were low correlations between client and therapist ratings. Results also indicated that social functioning and the activation and autistic preoccupation factors on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale were significant predictors of therapists' alliance ratings. There were no significant relationships between clinical predictors and clients' therapeutic alliance ratings. The findings indicate that client interpersonal factors are significant predictors of the therapist-rated alliance in the treatment of schizophrenia. Low correlations between clients' and therapists' ratings of the alliance should be examined in future research.     

Therapeutic alliance, cohesion and outcome in a long-term analytic group. A preliminary study

We studied the ongoing relationship of patients and their therapist in a long-term, analytic group. The therapeutic alliance was rated weekly and group cohesion was rated every month, by patients and therapist. The patients' symptoms (SCL-90-R) and interpersonal problems (IIP-C) were rated every third month during therapy (self-reports). There was a steady increase in the alliance ratings by patients and therapist during the first 2 years of therapy. This differs from findings in short-term therapies, where the alliance quickly reaches a high level and then remains stable throughout therapy. Therapist ratings of early alliance correlated significantly with positive symptomatic outcome, but did not predict interpersonal change. Patients' alliance ratings did not predict change. Early cohesion ratings did not predict change. The concordance between the patients' and the therapist's alliance ratings was highest between 16 and 30 sessions, and was essentially maintained throughout therapy. An early concordance of patient and therapist alliance ratings predicted a better symptomatic outcome. The measures of therapeutic alliance and cohesion used in this study seem to address different elements in the group process.     

The influence of baseline symptoms and insight on the therapeutic alliance early in the treatment of schizophrenia

BackgroundThe consistent association between therapeutic alliance and outcome underlines the importance of identifying factors which predict the development of a positive alliance. However, only few studies have examined the association between pretreatment characteristics and alliance formation in patients with schizophrenia.ObjectiveThe study examined whether symptoms and insight would predict the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy of schizophrenia. Further, the associations and differences between patient and therapist alliance ratings were studied.MethodsEighty patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders received manual-based psychotherapy. Assessment of symptoms and insight was conducted at baseline, and questionnaire-based alliance ratings were obtained three weeks into treatment. Patient and therapist alliance ratings were examined separately.ResultsPatient and therapist alliance ratings were not significantly correlated (r = 0.17). Patient ratings of the alliance were significantly higher than the ratings of their therapists (d = 0.73). More insight in psychosis significantly predicted higher patient ratings of the alliance. Less positive and negative symptoms were significant predictors of higher therapist alliance ratings.ConclusionThe findings indicate that symptoms and insight have an influence on the therapeutic alliance in the treatment of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Patients' and therapists' perceptions of the alliance do not seem to demonstrate much convergence.     

Interaction between alliance and technique in predicting patient outcome during psychodynamic psychotherapy

The current study examined whether alliance interacted with psychodynamic interventions to predict patients' psychotherapy outcomes. A prospective study of psychodynamic psychotherapy with 68 outpatients who were treated by 23 therapists was used. The patients rated the alliance with their therapist early in treatment. Therapist use of psychodynamic techniques was reliably rated by independent clinicians for the same sessions. The therapy outcomes were measured at the end of treatment based on the patients' global symptomatology as well as estimate of improvement across a broad range of functioning. In all models, we controlled for the patients' pretherapy psychiatric severity. Analyses were conducted using multilevel modeling to account for therapist effects. Results revealed that patient rated alliance was significantly related to improvement on a measure of broad band functioning. In addition, alliance and psychodynamic interventions interacted to predict this scale of multidimensional therapy outcome. Further, results showed that several individual psychodynamic techniques interacted with alliance that were meaningfully related to this measure of broad band outcome including (1) linking current feelings or perceptions to the past; (2) focusing attention on similarities among patient's relationships repeated over time, settings, or people; and (3) identifying recurrent patterns in patient's actions, feelings, and experiences. In this sample of outpatient psychodynamic treatments, the dynamic techniques were most effective when provided in the context of strong alliances.     

Therapist multicultural competency: A study of therapy dyads

[Correction Notice: An erratum for this article was reported in Vol 44(1) of Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training (see record 2007-04278-014). The fifth author's name should be spelled as follows: Alexa Mislowack.] This study examined the role of therapist multicultural competence (TMC). Fifty-one therapy dyads completed measures of therapist multicultural competency, working alliance, and their satisfaction with therapy. Clients also completed measures of therapist attractiveness, expertness, trustworthiness, and empathy. Results showed strong associations between clients' ratings of TMC and ratings of the working alliance, therapist empathy, and satisfaction. Clients' combined rating of therapist expertness, attractiveness, and trustworthiness were not associated with their TMC ratings but were significantly associated with therapists' self-appraised TMC ratings. Therapists' ratings of their TMC were associated with their ratings of the working alliance and satisfaction with their work. Results are discussed in the context of the relevant literature, as are implications for training and research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).     

Therapeutic alliance in cognitive therapy for schizophrenic and other long-term mentally ill patients: development and relationship to outcome in an in-patient treatment programme

A total of 26 schizophrenic and other long-term mentally ill patients receiving cognitive therapy sessions twice a week in the context of a comprehensive in-patient treatment programme were assessed every 5 weeks with regard to therapeutic alliance. The therapists rated the alliance according to the Psychotherapy Status Report and the patients rated it according to the Patient Collaboration Scale. The results showed either good or fair and stable therapeutic alliance for the majority of the patients throughout the treatment period. Few correlations were found between patient characteristics and initial alliance. The therapists' ratings showed a positive relationship between initial alliance and a favourable outcome of treatment at discharge.     

Consumer evaluation of a community mental health service, II: Perceptions of clinical care

Using patient self-report and therapist questionnaires, the authors investigated the perceptions of patients at a community mental health service about several aspects of their clinical care: what they expected from treatment, what they found helpful about treatment, how they thought treatment could be improved, their therapist preferences, and their perceptions of their treatment outcome. The patients' desire for advice and the perceived helpfulness of the advice given in therapy, the patients' limited preference for a therapist of their own ethnicity, and other findings are discussed, as is the usefulness of such consumer evaluations in mental health care delivery.     

Patient–therapist convergence in alliance ratings as a predictor of outcome in psychotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder

Objective: Although patients and therapists aligning over time on their perceptions of alliance quality is regarded as clinically important, few studies have examined the influence of such dyadic convergence on psychotherapy outcomes. This study tested whether early treatment convergence in patient–therapist alliance ratings was associated with subsequent worry and distress reduction in psychotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and whether treatment type and the dyad members’ initial alliance perceptions moderated these associations. Method: Data derived from a randomized trial for which patients with severe GAD received either 15 sessions of standard cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT; n?=?43) or CBT integrated with motivational interviewing (n?=?42). Patients and therapists rated the alliance after each session. Patients rated worry after each session, and their distress multiple times. Results: As predicted, dyadic multilevel modeling revealed that early alliance convergence was associated with greater subsequent worry (p?=?.03) and distress (p?=?.01) reduction, and the combination of low initial patient-rated alliance and low convergence was associated with the worst outcome for the distress variable (p?=?.04). Conclusions: Results suggest that alliance convergence may be an important clinical process that bears on outcome, rendering it an important marker for therapist responsiveness.     

Therapists’ and clients’ perception of each other and working alliance in the behavioral treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia

Abstract

Fifty-nine patients who fulfilled criteria for a primary diagnosis of panic disorder with moderate to severe agoraphobia were treated with 16 sessions of behavioral therapy. The study investigated the relationship between therapists’ and clients’ perception of each other, working alliance, and outcome. There was initially a low correspondence between therapist and client perceptions but a growing consensus during treatment. This was most pronounced regarding high ratings of therapist qualities and the perception of the client as attractive. Clients’ perceptions showed virtually zero correlation with outcome regardless of time. Therapist perception of client as showing active participation and goal direction yielded positive correlations with outcome at posttreatment and follow-up from Session 4 and throughout treatment. No significant relation between working alliance and outcome was found apart from the fact that those who improved during follow-up rated the alliance significantly higher than those who did not improve.     

Psychotherapy for social phobia: how do alliance and cognitive process interact to produce outcome?

The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether and how alliance and specific cognitive process may interact to influence outcome. Eighty social phobic patients were randomized to 10-week residential cognitive or interpersonal therapy, conducted mostly in groups. They completed process and outcome measures weekly. The ratings were analyzed with mixed models. It was found that initial patient-rated alliance predicted the course of social anxiety throughout therapy and that this effect was indirect through the cognitive process. However, this indirect effect did not interact with treatment. There was a trend toward an indirect effect of weekly variations in alliance rated by the individual therapist through weekly variations in subsequent cognitive process on weekly variations in subsequent social anxiety. Thus, the results support a facilitative rather than an active ingredient perspective on the role of alliance.     

Empathy and outcome in brief focal dynamic therapy

In an attempt to test the hypothesis that therapist empathy is an important variable in successful dynamic therapy, the authors collected outcome measures and empathy ratings in the brief focal dynamic therapy of 59 patients. There was no significant agreement among patients, therapists, and clinical supervisors when they used the same scale to rate therapist empathy for the same sessions. Only the patients' ratings correlated significantly with some of the outcome measures, and they added modest but statistically significant predictive variance on multiple regression analysis. The authors discuss the implications of these findings for the traditional mode of supervision of dynamic therapy.     

Psychotherapy for social phobia: How do alliance and cognitive process interact to produce outcome?

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether and how alliance and specific cognitive process may interact to influence outcome. Eighty social phobic patients were randomized to 10-week residential cognitive or interpersonal therapy, conducted mostly in groups. They completed process and outcome measures weekly. The ratings were analyzed with mixed models. It was found that initial patient-rated alliance predicted the course of social anxiety throughout therapy and that this effect was indirect through the cognitive process. However, this indirect effect did not interact with treatment. There was a trend toward an indirect effect of weekly variations in alliance rated by the individual therapist through weekly variations in subsequent cognitive process on weekly variations in subsequent social anxiety. Thus, the results support a facilitative rather than an active ingredient perspective on the role of alliance.     

Correlates of the real relationship in psychotherapy: A study of dyads

Abstract

This study examined several theoretical propositions regarding the role of the real relationship using a sample of 59 psychotherapy dyads. As hypothesized, positive associations were evident between therapist ratings of the real relationship and their ratings of the working alliance and client progress; negative associations were found between therapist ratings of the real relationship and attachment avoidance. For clients, significant and hypothesized associations were found between ratings of the real relationship and secure attachment to therapists as well as their perceptions of therapist empathy. Regression analyses showed that client ratings of the real relationship were significantly associated with their ratings of progress in treatment above and beyond their ratings of the working alliance, therapist empathy, and attachment.     

Negative symptoms and poor insight as predictors of the similarity between client and therapist ratings of therapeutic alliance in cognitive behavior therapy for patients with schizophrenia

Recent studies have found that clients with schizophrenia rate therapeutic alliance more highly than therapists. Unclear is whether there are clinical characteristics which predict the degree of difference in client and therapist ratings. To explore this, we correlated client and therapist ratings of therapeutic alliance with baseline assessments of positive negative, and disorganized symptoms and awareness of need for treatment. Participants were 40 adults with schizophrenia enrolled in a 6-month program of cognitive behavior therapy. Results indicated that clients produced higher ratings of therapeutic alliance than therapists and that therapist and client general ratings were more disparate when clients had fewer negative symptoms and better insight. Higher overall client ratings of therapeutic alliance were linked to lower levels of positive, negative, and disorganized symptoms and better awareness of need for treatment. Higher overall therapist ratings were linked only to lower levels of disorganized symptoms among clients.     

Stressful involvement in psychotherapeutic work: Therapist, client and process correlates

Abstract We examined potential predictors of therapists' "Stressful Involvement" (SI) among variables reflecting the psychotherapy process, therapist characteristics, patients' symptom severity or context variables (treatment setting). Ninety-eight sequences from individual psychodynamic treatments conducted by 26 therapists were studied. Data were analyzed using mixed regression models. Between-therapist and within-therapist variance accounted for most of the difference in SI. SI was strongly associated with negative feelings of the therapist about patient and therapy in the time between sessions. Therapists with more 'unassertive' and 'vindictive' interpersonal styles were also more prone to experiencing SI. The strong association of SI with therapist rather than patient characteristics and process ratings indicates the importance of further study of the therapist as a person and participant in psychotherapy.     

Is there an optimal adjustment of interpretation to the patients' level of defensive functioning?

In this process-outcome study, we explored whether the therapists' Adjustment Ratio of interpretation would be predictive of the development of working alliance in brief dynamic psychotherapy (N = 39, max 40 sessions). Therapist interventions were rated in an early session (7th) and in the mid-phase of therapy (16th session). We found that, what was assumed to be an optimal Adjustment Ratio in relation to patients' defensive functioning, was associated with lower quality of working alliance, whereas what was assumed to be a poor Adjustment Ratio was associated with a more favorable alliance. The general finding was that when relatively more supportive interventions were given to patients with higher ODF, the working alliance was improved. Implications of the findings are discussed.     

Perceptions of schizophrenic patients and their therapists: application of the semantic differential technique to evaluate the treatment relationship

This study is an attempt to evaluate the treatment relationship with schizophrenic patients by examining the patients' and their therapists' perceptions of themselves and each other, which are hypothesized to reflect features of the relationship. One hundred fifty-eight schizophrenic patients and 11 psychiatrists who maintained a supportive relationship with the patients as a therapist estimated their perceptions using the semantic differential (SD) technique with 17 adjective pairs. Eight composite scales with sufficient internal consistency were constructed from the estimations. The interrelationship among the perceptual elements, which was represented by correlation analysis of the composite scale scores, seemed consistent with our clinical experience. A factor-analytic study of the scales yielded 3 orthogonal factors that could be assumed to characterize the treatment relationship. The patient-therapist cooperation factor indicated the degree of trust between the two participants, supposedly the affective or relational aspect of the therapeutic alliance. The therapist passivity factor reflects the therapist's passive role-taking and the clinical stability of the patient. The patient strength factor was related to the condition-related and characterological strength of the patient. It is demonstrated that the estimations performed by patients and therapists are valid and useful for evaluation of the treatment relationship in the current status.     

How do therapists enhance family alliances? Sequential analyses of therapist-client behavior in two contrasting cases

To identify alliance-related behavior patterns in more and less successful family therapy, the authors intensively analyzed two cases with highly discrepant outcomes. Both families were seen by the same experienced clinician. Results showed that participants' perceptions of the alliance, session impact, and improvement at three points in time were congruent with the families' differential outcomes and with observer-related alliance behavior using the System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances. In this measure, therapist behaviors contribute to the alliance and client behaviors reveal the strength of the alliance on four dimensions: Engagement in the Therapeutic Process, Emotional Connection with the Therapist, Safety within the Therapeutic System, and Shared Sense of Purpose within the Family. In the poor outcome case, observer ratings and self-reported alliance scores revealed a persistently "split" alliance between family members; this family dropped out midtreatment. Only in the good outcome case did the clients follow the therapist's alliance-building interventions with positive alliance behaviors; sequential analyses showed that therapist contributions to Engagement significantly activated client Engagement behavior, and therapist Emotional Connection interventions significantly activated client Emotional Connection. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).     

Clients' perceptions of their psychotherapists' multicultural orientation

The current retrospective study examined whether clients' (N = 176) perceptions of their psychotherapists' multicultural orientation (MCO) were associated with their psychological functioning, working alliance, and real relationship scores. Moreover, we tested whether clients' perceptions of the working alliance and the real relationship mediated the relationship between clients' perceptions of their psychotherapists' MCO and psychological functioning. The results showed that clients' perceptions of their psychotherapists' MCO were positively related to working alliance, real relationship, and psychological functioning. Only clients' ratings of the working alliance mediated the relationship between clients' perceptions of their psychotherapists' MCO and psychological functioning. Thus, because clients perceive their psychotherapists as being more oriented toward cultural issues, they may view the therapist as being more credible and may gain a sense of comfort in the therapeutic process. In turn, clients' strong alliance facilitates improvement in psychological well-being.