Effect of spasmolytic drugs on esophageal foreign bodies

Muscle spasm has been proposed as the cause for esophageal food impaction. The aim was therefore to treat esophageal foreign bodies with spasmolytic drugs influencing both striated and smooth muscles of the esophagus. A multicenter, placebo-controlled, doubleblind study of glucagon and diazepam was undertaken in 43 patients. The foreign body disimpacted in 9 of 24 patients given active substances and in 6 of 19 patients given placebo; there was no significant difference between these two groups. Almost all disimpactions occurred several hours after injection of the drugs. The hypothesis of muscle spasm as an important cause of esophageal obstruction was rejected. Medical therapies for food disimpaction other than spasmolytic drugs have to be investigated.     

Outcomes of acute esophageal food impaction: success of the push technique

BACKGROUND: Acute esophageal food impaction (AEFI) is the most common form of esophageal impaction in adults. The current recommendation for management is extraction by using an overtube to protect the airway, which facilitates multiple passages of the endoscope and protects the esophageal mucosa. Typically, AEFI in our patients is treated with the push technique, a method found to be highly successful and without complications. METHODS: All patients with a diagnosis of AEFI from 1993 to 1998 were identified by computer search of ICD-9 diagnosis code 935.1 (foreign body of the esophagus). Patients were excluded if they were less than 18 years of age, had an acute esophageal foreign body other than food, or if the medical record was incomplete. RESULTS: The analysis included 189 patients: 114 men and 75 women. Of these, 77 (41%) had a Schatzki's ring, 61 (32%) had an esophageal stricture, and 4 (2%) had esophageal cancer. In 47 patients (25%) no obvious structural cause for AEFI was noted at endoscopy. In addition, 67 patients had breaks in the esophageal mucosa. The push technique resolved the food impaction in 184 of 189 (97%) of the patients. In no subgroup was there an instance of perforation, aspiration, or bleeding. Forty-five patients underwent dilation at the time of food disimpaction without complication. CONCLUSIONS: The push technique is both safe and effective in the treatment of AEFI. Dilation at the initial presentation of a patient with AEFI likewise appears to be safe. The push technique is recommended as the initial therapy of choice for AEFI. Dilation at the time of esophageal food disimpaction can be considered if there are no obvious contraindications.     

Endoscopic management of suspected esophageal foreign body in adults

Foreign bodies should not be allowed to remain in the esophagus beyond 24 hours after presentation. However, some patients with esophageal foreign body ingestion do not come to the hospital immediately and may delay medical intervention from the time of ingestion. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of adults with suspected esophageal foreign body ingestion according to the time of ingestion and types of foreign bodies. A total of 326 adult patients (151 men and 175 women) were analyzed, and divided into two groups according to the time period: within or beyond 24 hours from ingestion to endoscopic intervention. A total of 172 patients (52.7%) were found to have ingested foreign bodies; 73.5% were removed smoothly, 10.3% were treated by push technique and 16.0% with failed retrieval received alternative treatments. A higher proportion of patients in the beyond‐24 hours group suffered from odynophagia (25.9 vs. 12.9%, P < 0.05). Negative identification of esophageal foreign bodies was more frequent in the beyond‐24 hours group (67 vs. 40.2%, P < 0.05), but these patients showed higher proportions of esophageal ulcers (21.1 vs. 7.2%, P < 0.05). The beyond‐24 hours group also showed a significantly higher rate of foreign bodies in the lower esophagus (40.0 vs. 15.3%, P < 0.05). Patients with esophageal food bolus impaction had significant delayed endoscopic intervention, longer therapeutic endoscopic time, higher proportions of esophageal cancer, stricture and fewer complications. Endoscopic intervention within 24 hours from the time of ingestion should be considered early in adults, because delaying intervention may produce more symptomatic esophageal ulcerations with odynophagia.     

Assessment of the Predictors of Response to Glucagon in the Setting of Acute Esophageal Food Bolus Impaction

Esophageal food impactions are frequently seen in endoscopic practice. Glucagon is known to relax the lower esophageal sphincter and has been used with variable success to treat food impactions. We retrieved clinical information of all patients with acute food impactions who attended the emergency room from 1975 to 2000 from the Mayo diagnostic database. Data were abstracted on age, sex, body mass index, relevant prior medical history, food type ingested (meat, bread, vegetable, or other), duration of symptoms at presentation, dosage (in mg) of glucagon, outcome including success of glucagon or spontaneous passage, and endoscopic findings. A total of 222 cases of food impaction were identified, of whom 106 patients (48%) received glucagon, average 1 mg. In glucagon responders, meat was less likely to be the offending food type, accounting for 70% (glucagon responders) vs. 90% (in nonresponders) (p = 0.03), while responders were less likely to have esophageal rings/strictures detected on subsequent EGD compared with nonresponders, 0% (glucagon responders) vs. 31% (nonresponders) (p = 0.05). In the patients that did not receive glucagon, spontaneous resolvers had a shorter duration of symptoms at presentation, 3.3 h vs. 12.4 h (p = 0.07) and were less likely to have an organic esophageal obstruction detected on EGD, 0% vs. 21%. There were no significant differences between the resolvers and nonresolvers in terms of age, gender, BMI, and prior medical history. Conservative management of acute food bolus obstruction, either with or without glucagon, is most successful in the absence of a fixed esophageal obstruction. An impacted meat bolus is more likely to require intervention for removal than other food types. These clinical predictors should be considered before administration of glucagon.     

Update on Foreign Bodies in the Esophagus: Diagnosis and Management

Foreign body impaction in the esophagus is an important emergency that carries significant morbidity and potential mortality. The most common cause of esophageal foreign body obstruction in adults is meat bolus impaction above a pre-existing distal esophageal (mucosal) ring, peptic or malignant esophageal stricture, or eosinophilic esophagitis. Immediate evaluation of the airway, assessment of the urgency of removal, radiological evaluation to localize the object, endoscopic or surgical retrieval, and subsequent monitoring for complications are essential steps in the management.     

Endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract: a retrospective study of 1294 cases

Objective: To report our endoscopic outcomes and explore the effects of duration of impaction and anesthetic methods on the endoscopic removal of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Methods: All consecutive patients with suspected foreign body (FB) ingestion between January 2013 and June 2016 were enrolled. Demographic, clinical and endoscopic data were collected and analyzed.

Results: A total of 1294 patients aged seven months to 94 years were enrolled. Odynophagia (415 cases, 32.1%), FB sensation (340 cases, 26.3%) and sore throat (267 cases, 20.1%) were the most frequent complaints. The duration of FB impaction ranged from 4?h to over two years. Anatomically, foreign bodies were most commonly located in the esophagus (n?=?1025, 86.9%). Bony foreign bodies comprised the majority of identified foreign bodies. The most common underlying pathology was esophageal stricture (38 cases, 53.5%). Nearly half of the patients (49.9%) developed complications. As the duration of impaction increased, the success rate by endoscopy decreased (p?p?p?=?.793 and p?=?.085). Age?≥60, duration of impaction longer than one day, impaction in the esophagus, and sharp foreign bodies were identified as risk factors for complications.

Conclusions: Delayed flexible endoscopy in patients, especially elderly patients, with sharp FB impactions in the esophagus results in worse endoscopic outcomes. Endoscopic management under general anesthesia did not improve the therapeutic results compared with topical pharyngeal anesthesia.     

Diffuse esophageal spasm: not diffuse but distal esophageal spasm (DES)

Diffuse esophageal spasm is an uncommon motility disorder that is found in less than 5% of patients undergoing esophageal motility testing for dysphagia. It is defined manometrically by the presence of 20% or more simultaneous contractions in the distal esophageal body with normal peristalsis. This motility abnormality has been traditionally identified as occurring primarily in the smooth muscle portion of the distal esophagus yet, the term diffuse persists in the medical literature to identify DES. The aim of our study was to assess the diffuse or limited nature of this entity by evaluating the prevalence of simultaneous contractions in both proximal and distal esophagus in patients with DES. We reviewed esophageal motility tracings of 53 consecutive patients (32 F, 21 M) with DES and compared them with 53 age-matched patients with manometric normal studies. In the distal esophagus we found 195 simultaneous contractions (37% of swallows) with a median of 3 and range of 2–7 per patient. Of the 53 patients with DES a total of 13 simultaneous contractions (2% of swallows) occurred in the proximal esophagus with only 3 (5.6%) of the 53 patients having 2 or more simultaneous contractions in 10 swallows. None of the patients with normal manometry showed more than one simultaneous contraction in either proximal or distal esophagus. In conclusion, these findings suggest that the term diffuse esophageal spasm is a misnomer and the DES is more appropriately described as distal esophageal spasm.     

A Questionnaire Study to Assess Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Abnormal Esophageal Manometry

Patients with unexplained chest pain or dysphagia are often referred for esophageal manometric studies to further investigate their symptoms. Four main manometric abnormalities have been described: achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm, “nutcracker” (hypercontracting) esophagus, and hypocontracting esophagus. With the exception of achalasia, treatments are of limited benefit and the natural history of these conditions is largely unknown. We sent questionnaires to patients who were investigated at least three years before our study began. They repeated a DeMeester symptom questionnaire that they had completed at the time of their initial study. Questionnaires were sent to 137 patients with diffuse esophageal spasm, “nutcracker” (hypercontracting) esophagus, or hypocontracting esophagus. We also sent questionnaires to 57 patients with dysphagia or chest pain who had had normal esophageal manometry and pH studies. These patients acted as symptomatic controls. Responses were compared using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Seventy-two (53%) patients with diffuse esophageal spasm, “nutcracker” esophagus, or hypocontracting esophagus replied. An additional 8 (6%) patients died. Symptom scores in all three conditions had improved significantly over time (p ≤ 0.01 for each condition, Wilcoxon signed ranks test). Patients with dysphagia or chest pain but normal esophageal studies had not improved. The significance of diffuse esophageal spasm, “nutcracker” esophagus, and hypocontracting esophagus found at esophageal manometry remains uncertain. Although treatment is often ineffective, these conditions typically run a benign course. Patients can be reassured that their symptoms are likely to improve with time.     

Repetitive contractions of the upper esophageal body and sphincter in achalasia

This report describes repetitive contractions in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and the repetitive upper esophageal spontaneous contractions (RUESCs) of patients with achalasia and relates this activity to repetitive contractile activity (RCA) recorded in the more distal esophageal body, to intraesophageal pressure (IEP), and to lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. Two hundred and sixteen consecutive esophageal motility studies from 156 achalasia patients were retrospectively assessed. RUESCs were found in 105 patients (67%) and 125 of 216 studies (58%). General features of the RUESC were (1) coincidence with simultaneous repetitive increases in pressure throughout the entire esophageal body; (2) amplitude of pressure increases tended to be higher in the proximal esophagus; (3) RUESC frequency was different than respiration, except for 6 cases where continuous, RUESC and RCA were synchronized with inspiration; and (4) RUESCs were positively associated with increased IEP, and with increased LES pressure (>40 mmHg). RCA in the esophageal body was uncommon without RUESC. It is concluded that (1) RUESCs are common in achalasia and appear to be closely linked to contractile activity in the upper esophageal body; (2) the close relationship of RUESC and RCA in the esophageal body to increased IEP and elevated LES pressure suggests that esophageal tone is high in these subjects; and (3) these findings indicate a potential mechanism for localization of some of the clinical symptoms to the retrosternal and suprasternal areas, for the inability to readily belch, and for the development of structural features such as a prominent cricopharyngeal bar.     

Effect of Doses of Glucagon Used to Treat Food Impaction on Esophageal Motor Function of Normal Subjects

We studied 10 normal subjects to determine the effect of doses of intravenous glucagon used to treat food impaction on esophageal motor function. With a multilumen assembly perfused by a low compliance pneumohydraulic infusion pump, esophageal manometry was performed during baseline and after randomized administration of 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg intravenous glucagon. Mean proximal and distal amplitudes of contraction, proximal and distal amplitude of contraction duration, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure, percentage of LES relaxation, and glucagon-related side effects were evaluated. No effect on proximal amplitude of contraction and proximal or distal esophageal contraction duration was noted. Mean amplitude of contraction in the distal esophagus was further reduced with increased dosage of glucagon but did not achieve statistical significance. Mean LES resting pressure was significantly reduced after 0.25 mg (18.7 ± 1.8 vs. 10.2 ± 1.5 mmHg, p= 0.0001) and further reduced after 0.5 mg (5.9 ± 1.2 mmHg, p= 0.0009). Mean LES relaxation was significantly reduced after 0.25 mg (93.1 ± 2.4% vs. 63.6 ± 8.8%, p= 0.0031). The 1-mg dose versus the 0.5-mg did not provide further reduction in any LES function parameters. One subject experienced transient nausea after 0.5 mg, and 4 subjects experienced nausea after 1 mg glucagon. In conclusion, increased doses of glucagon further reduce mean distal esophageal amplitude of contraction. Although maximum reduction in mean LES resting pressure was achieved with 0.5 mg, it did not provide any potential therapeutic advantage over 0.25 mg glucagon. Nausea is a common, transient side effect predominantly affecting subjects treated with the 1-mg dose.     

Fatal aspiration pneumonia caused by an esophageal foreign body

Esophageal foreign body accompanied by respiratory complications is a rare condition. A few cases have been reported, only two of them in adults. We describe the case of a 34-year-old mentally retarded patient who was hospitalized for aspiration pneumonia and died 48 hours after admission. At autopsy, the prominent finding was a 3 X 3-cm stone impacted into the upper esophagus and compressing the trachea from behind. The possibility of an esophageal foreign body should be included in the differential diagnosis of unexplained respiratory distress or aspiration pneumonia in adults.     

Two cases of steakhouse syndrome associated with nutcracker esophagus

The most common type of esophageal food-related foreign body is the meat bolus, which is frequently associated with underlying esophageal stenosis. Herein, we report two cases of meat bolus impaction associated with nutcracker esophagus. In the first case, the 63-year-old male patient had chest discomfort and swallowing difficulty after ingestion of butcher's meat. In the second case, the 55-year-old male patient had complained of swallowing difficulty after ingestion of chicken. In both cases, no pathologic findings were observed endoscopically after removal of the esophageal meat bolus. We performed esophageal manometry, which showed very high amplitudes of esophageal pressure in the mid- and distal esophagus. These findings were consistent with nutcracker esophagus. These cases show that esophageal motility disorder may be the cause of esophageal foreign body impaction, and esophageal manometry should be performed for evaluation of the cause of foreign body, especially in an endoscopically normal patient.     

Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus after partial gastrectomy

Twelve patients (10.4%) had a history of partial gastrectomy among the 115 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. The clinical characteristics, nutritional parameters, and incidences of esophagitis of the resected specimens were investigated between 11 patients with esophageal carcinoma who had partial gastrectomy for peptic ulcer diseases (Group A) and 103 patients with esophageal carcinoma without any previous history of gastrectomy (Group B). Age, sex, tumor location, clinical stages, and cigarette and alcohol consumption were not different between the two groups. Hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin level in Group A were lower than those in Group B (p<0.05). Serum zinc level in Group A was lower than that in Group B, but this difference was not significant. There was no difference in the incidences of esophagitis between the two groups. In conclusion, there is an association between partial gastrectomy and later development of squamous esophageal carcinoma. The role of malnutritional factors and gastroesophageal reflux, however, remain unclear. The long-term follow-up of patients after partial gastrectomy is warranted.     

Use of Glucagon in Relieving Esophageal Food Bolus Impaction in the Era of Eosinophilic Esophageal Infiltration

Esophageal food bolus impaction may require an urgent endoscopy. Glucagon is often administered to promote spontaneous passage of the food bolus. Eosinophilic esophagitis is increasingly recognized as a cause of dysphagia, and food impaction is often the presenting symptom. Our study was aimed at determining the effectiveness of glucagon in relieving esophageal foreign body obstruction in general and in the setting of esophageal eosinophilic infiltration (EEI). A retrospective chart review was performed using the ICD codes and the emergency department database of adult patients presenting with symptoms of esophageal food bolus impaction from July 2004 to October 2010. Response to glucagon was defined as symptomatic relief of obstruction prior to endoscopic intervention. A total of 213 episodes of esophageal food bolus obstruction in 192 patients were identified during the study period. Glucagon was given in 125 cases of which 41 had a response (32.8 %). A total of 170 episodes had an Esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed either during the impaction event or at a later date. Of the 60 patients’ biopsies, 45 had received glucagon (17 with EEI, 28 without EEI). None of the 17 episodes with EEI as compared to 8 of the 28 without EEI responded to glucagon (0 % vs. 28.5 %, p = 0.017). Glucagon is effective in about one third of patients with esophageal food bolus impaction, which is consistent with historical data. Patients with EEI appear less likely to respond to glucagon.     

Saliva transit in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Saliva is an important factor in the neutralization of the acidity of the refluxed material that comes from the stomach to the esophagus. The impairment of saliva transit from oral cavity to distal esophagus may be one of the causes of esophagitis and symptoms in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). With the scintigraphic method, the transit of 2 mL of artificial saliva was measured in 30 patients with GERD and 26 controls. The patients with GERD had symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation, a 24‐hour pH monitoring with more than 4.2% of the time with pH below four, 26 with erosive esophagitis, and four with non‐erosive reflux disease. Fourteen had mild dysphagia for solid foods. Twenty‐one patients had normal esophageal manometry, and nine had ineffective esophageal motility. They were 15 men and 15 women, aged 21–61 years, mean 39 years. The control group had 14 men and 12 women, aged 19–61 years, mean 35 years. The subjects swallowed in the sitting and supine position 2 mL of artificial saliva labeled with 18 MBq of ^99mTechnetium phytate. The time of saliva transit was measured from oral cavity to esophageal‐gastric transition, from proximal esophagus to esophageal‐gastric transition, and the transit through proximal, middle, and distal esophageal body. There was no difference between patients and controls in the time for saliva to go from oral cavity to esophageal‐gastric transition, and from proximal esophagus to esophageal‐gastric transition, in the sitting and supine positions. In distal esophagus in the sitting position, the saliva transit duration was shorter in patients with GERD (3.0 ± 0.8 seconds) than in controls (7.6 ± 1.7 seconds, P = 0.03). In conclusion, the saliva transit from oral cavity to the esophageal‐gastric transition in patients with GERD has the same duration than in controls. Saliva transit through the distal esophageal body is faster in patients with GERD than controls.     

Stationary vs. mapping manometry in evaluating dysphagia

Two methods are used to assess esophageal motility. The mapping technique uses catheter withdrawal at 1 cm steps until the entire esophagus is evaluated. A simpler method is commonly used that involves keeping the catheter stationary for the entire evaluation. We compared these 2 techniques in 30 patients referred for the evaluation of dysphagia. Emphasis was placed on the distal 10 cm of the esophagus because this is the primary location of esophageal motility disorders. There was excellent correlation between techniques for mean distal amplitude (r=0.945), mean distal duration (r=0.942), and percentage of non-peristaltic contractions (r=0.967). The overall manometry diagnosis was similar by both methods in 27 (90%) patients. Three patients had different manometry diagnoses resulting from use of the two techniques. However, the change in diagnosis was only clinically important in one patient in whom the mapping technique identified a segmental motility disorder that had been missed by the stationary technique. Stationary manometry had a 94% sensitivity and 93% specificity rate for identifying motility disorders compared to mapping manometry. We conclude that stationary manometry is a simple and accurate method for evaluating esophageal pressures and distal disorders. Only those patients with normal results of stationary studies may benefit by further mapping to identify rare segmental motility disorders.     

The Effect of an Effortful Swallow on the Normal Adult Esophagus

The effect of an effortful swallow on the healthy adult esophagus was investigated using concurrent oral and esophageal manometry (water perfusion system) on ten normal adults (5 males and 5 females, 20-35 years old) while swallowing 5-ml boluses of water. The effects of gender, swallow condition (effortful versus noneffortful swallows), and sensor site within the oral cavity, esophageal body, and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) were examined relative to amplitude, duration, and velocity of esophageal body contractions, LES residual pressure, and LES relaxation duration. The results of this study provide novel evidence that an effortful oropharyngeal swallow has an effect on the esophageal phase of swallowing. Specifically, effortful swallowing resulted in significantly increased peristaltic amplitudes within the distal smooth muscle region of the esophagus, without affecting the more proximal regions containing striated muscle fibers. The findings pertaining to the LES are inconclusive and require further exploration using methods that permit more reliable measurements of LES function. The results of this study hold tremendous clinical potential for esophageal disorders that result in abnormally low peristaltic pressures in the distal esophageal body, such as achalasia, scleroderma, and ineffective esophageal motility. However, additional studies are necessary to both replicate and extend the present findings, preferably using a solid-state manometric system in conjunction with bolus flow testing on both normal and disordered populations, to fully characterize the effects of an effortful swallow on the esophagus.     

Eosinophilic esophagitis: a practical approach to diagnosis and management

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has emerged as a common cause of dysphagia and food impaction in children and adults. A trial of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is a mandatory diagnostic first step, given that at least one third of patients with suspected EoE will have PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilia. Once EoE is diagnosed, short-and long-term therapeutic decision making may rely on patient symptoms, phenotype (inflammatory vs fibrostenotic) and preferences. Currently, the most reliable therapeutic targets are mucosal healing and caliber abnormalities resolution. Topical steroids followed by endoscopic dilation are recommended in symptomatic narrow caliber esophagus/strictures, whereas either topical steroids or dietary therapy are good short-term options for mucosal inflammation. Maintenance anti-inflammatory therapy is necessary to prevent esophageal fibrotic remodeling and stricture formation.     

Foreign body entrapment in the esophagus of healthy subjects—A manometric and scintigraphic study

Foreign body entrapment and mucosal injury caused by oral medications are increasingly reported to occur in the upper esophagus in apparently normal subjects. We performed esophageal manometry in 40 normal volunteers to determine whether a unique motility pattern in the upper third of the esophagus predisposes to entrapment of foreign bodies at this site; 18 normal volunteers also had transit scintigraphy of a gelatine capsule filled with a radionuclide. The esophageal body was divided into five consecutive segments starting proximally, with each segment corresponding to 20% of the total length. Amplitude, slope, and velocity of the esophageal contraction were markedly decreased in the second segment compared with the other segments. Entrapment and dissolution of a gelatine capsule occurred in 39% of volunteers in the proximal eosphagus correlating to the second segment, i.e., the segment with the lowest amplitude, slope, and velocity of esophageal contractions. The observation that wet swallows have greater amplitudes (P<0.01) and steeper slopes (P<0.05) than dry swallows explains why the occurrence of pill entrapment was reduced when taken with sufficient water. However, even with a water chaser of 120 mL, pill entrapment occurred at the second segment of the esophagus in 1 of 18 volunteers. The observed motility pattern in the proximal eosphagus provides a better explanation for the entrapment of foreign bodies at this site than compression of the esophagus by the left main stem bronchus, aortic arch, or left atrium as suggested by other investigators.