成人间活体肝移植94例报告

目的 探讨成人间活体肝移植供者评估、手术方式的选择及术后并发症分析.方法 收集2007年1月至2010年8月同一外科组施行的94例成人间活体肝移植的临床资料.受者年龄18 ～76岁,供者年龄19 ～60岁.94例活体肝移植手术方案包括:左半肝供肝移植2例,右半肝供肝移植92例,44例切取肝中静脉例,48例不切取肝中静脉.分析供受者术前评估、术后并发症及存活情况.结果 所有供者均恢复良好出院,供者并发症发生率为7.4％.随访截止于2011年5月31日,中位随访时间为37个月,死亡8例.供者1年存活率为95.7％,移植物存活率为94.7％.1例发生小肝综合征;1例因急性肝坏死行再次肝移植;24例(25.5％)经胆道造影或磁共振胰胆管成像检查发现胆道吻合口狭窄,但其中9例(9.6％)表现为肝功能异常.结论 活体肝移植是治疗终末期肝病的有效方法,精确的术前评估、合理手术方式选择,采用左半肝或右半肝供肝、含或不含肝中静脉的活体肝移植,在成人间活体肝移植中均能有效的保证供受者安全.     

活体肝移植不同供肝切取方式对残肝再生的影响

目的 探讨活体肝移植不同方式供肝切取术后供者康复及肝脏再生情况.方法 回顾性分析2006年5月至2011年5月13例活体肝移植供者临床资料.对不同方式供肝切取手术方法、供者术后肝功能指标变化及残肝再生情况进行比较.结果 供者手术分为不包含肝中静脉右半肝切除8例,包含肝中静脉右半肝切除2例,左半肝切除3例.供者肝功能及凝血指标均于术后两周恢复正常,术后未见严重并发症,随访情况良好,无供者死亡.术前CT估算供肝体积与术中实际切取供肝重量呈正相关(r＝0.838,P＜0.01).术后复查CT测残肝体积示:右半肝供者残肝较左半肝供者残肝再生速度快,不带肝中静脉右半肝供者较带肝中静脉右半肝供者残肝再生速度略高,但供者肝脏功能恢复无明显差异.结论 不同术式活体肝移植供者在规范化围手术期处理、精细手术操作后肝功能均能得到较好的康复,而供肝切取术后残肝再生速度则受切取比例、残肝供血情况、细胞因子调控等多因素影响.     

活体肝移植治疗终末期肝病

目的 探讨活体肝移植(1iving donor liver transplantation,LDLT)供、受者术前评估和手术方式的选择.方法 回顾性分析1995年1月至2007年10月我中心95例LDLT患者的临床资料.良性终末期肝病92例,其中Wilson病45例;肝脏恶性肿瘤3例.结果 供肝切取不带肝中静脉右半肝31例,带肝中静脉右半肝3例,带肝中静脉左半肝51例,不带肝中静脉左半肝或左外叶10例.所有供者术后顺利恢复,均未出现严重并发症.受者随访1～86个月,良性终末期肝病受者1、3、5年累积生存率分别为89%(82例)、78%(71例)和73%(67例),其中Wilson病受者1、3、5年累积生存率分别为92%(42例)、89%(40例)和76%(34例).3例肝脏恶性肿瘤患者死亡2例,1例长期生存.供、受者铜代谢均恢复正常.结论 建立供者安全保障体系是LDLT开展的先决条件,选择合理的手术方式是提高受者生存率的关键.亲体肝移植是治疗Wilson病的有效手段.     

儿童活体部分肝移植

活体部分肝移植术现已成为儿童终末期肝病的有效治疗方法,本文就儿童活体部分肝移植的适应证、禁忌证、术前供受者评估、供者肝部分切取、受者手术要点以及术后并发症及预后方面进行综述.     

腔镜辅助带肝中静脉活体右半肝供肝切取技术:附七例报道

目的 探讨腹腔镜辅助肝切除(assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy,ALH)技术在活体肝移植供体切取中的应用及其意义.方法 对201l年5月30日至9月1日我院7例成功施行腹腔镜辅助带肝中静脉(middle hepatic vein,MHV)活体右半肝供肝切取术的患者资料进行回顾分析.结果 供者残肝比例32.10％～38.31％.7例供者术后伤口疼痛较轻,未出现外科并发症.7例均为皮内缝合,术后7d伤口拆线,愈合良好.术后2周肝功能基本恢复正常.结论 ALH可安全用于带MHV的活体右半肝供肝切取.ALH兼顾腹腔镜手术微创和开腹手术安全性高的特点,更容易为供、受者接受.     

腹腔镜活体肝移植供肝切取技术要点及评价(附12例报告)

目的探讨腹腔镜活体肝移植供肝切取手术的技术要点和应用前景。方法回顾性分析2015年9月至2016年10月四川大学华西医院肝脏肝移植外科12例腹腔镜下活体肝移植供肝切取术病人资料。分析12例供者及相应12例受者的手术及预后情况。结果 12例供者中,切取不包括肝中静脉的右半肝6例,左外叶3例,不包括肝中静脉的左半肝3例。术中失血量400(100~600 mL)。供者住院时间7(4~10 d)。所有供者术后均无并发症发生及围手术期死亡。12例受者术前移植物受体体重比(GRWR)为0.94%(0.54%~3.70%)。手术时间625(405~720 min)。术中失血量750(200~3000)mL。术后住院时间20(7~40)d。1例受者病人术后第7天发生消化道出血,保守治疗后出血停止。1例受者病人术后出现肺部感染,保守治疗后无效于术后第8天因呼吸衰竭死亡。其余受者病人术后顺利出院。结论随着技术的不断发展和器械的不断改进,腹腔镜活体肝移植供肝切取将有广阔的应用前景。     

活体肝移植的供肝处理技巧

目的 探讨活体肝移植术供肝的选择，切取和修整，方法 1997至2001年期间，第四军医大学西京医院共完成活体肝移植术3例。其中2例是儿童活体肝移植术，另1例是成人辅助性原位活体肝移植术，供肝切取均为左外叶，供者术中作必要的肝周韧带游离和肝门解剖，超声刀切取供肝，不阻断肝脏血流。结果 供者手术时间为5-6.5h，失血量为200-400ml，无并发症发生。目前所有的供者肝功能均正常。恢复正常的工作和生活。结论 左肝外叶切除对供者是非常安全的。一般无手术并发症发生。     

精准肝脏外科理念在儿童活体肝移植供肝切取术中的临床价值

目的 探讨精准肝脏外科理念在儿童活体肝移植供肝切取术中的临床价值.方法 回顾性分析2012年12月至2014年1月上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院收治的58例儿童活体肝移植供者的临床资料.术前对供者行CT等检查,将二维影像学数据进行三维重建,评估供者肝内胆管和血管情况,并对肝左动脉和肝左静脉解剖结构进行分型,测算供者标准肝脏体积、拟切取肝脏体积和受者标准肝脏体积,模拟手术操作,制订手术方案.采取精准肝切除切取供肝.采用门诊和电话方式进行随访,随访时间截至2014年4月.结果 58例儿童活体肝移植供者术前CT血管造影检查示肝左动脉Ⅰ型28例、Ⅱ型10例、Ⅲ型20例、无Ⅳ型供者;肝左静脉Ⅰ型35例、Ⅱ型23例.三维重建预测拟切取肝脏体积为(243±65) mL.58例供者均成功完成供肝切取术,其中7例为左半肝切取,51例为肝左外叶切取.2例供者行胆囊切除.术中实际切取肝脏体积为(255±59) mL,拟切取肝脏体积平均误差率为4.94％.移植物质量与受者体质量比为3.3％±1.0％.手术时间为(260±89)min,术中出血量为(181±35)mL,仅1例供者术中输RBC 2 U.供者术后胃肠功能恢复时间为(2.0±1.1)d,术后拔除引流管时间为(3.0±1.2)d,术后住院时间为(7±3)d,出院时所有供者血清WBC、Hb、ALT、AST、TBil、DBil、AIb等指标水平正常.2例供者术后发生并发症,分别为切口少量渗血和脂肪液化,均经对症治疗后痊愈.58例儿童活体肝移植供者术后均获得随访,中位随访时间为8.7个月.供者恢复良好,随访期间无并发症发生.结论 精准肝脏外科理念应用于儿童活体肝移植供肝切取术,切取准确率高、供者肝功能损害小、术后并发症少、恢复快.     

成人间活体右半肝移植术中变异门静脉右支切取与重建技术

目的 探讨成人间活体右半肝移植术中变异门静脉支(APVB)切取与重建的技巧.方法 2002年1月至2007年4月,共实施70例成人间活体右半肝移植.术前肝脏血管三维CT成像显示供肝动脉及静脉走向,70例右半供肝中有9例门静脉分支变异,其中7例为Ⅱ型变异,2例为Ⅲ型变异.除1例供者行狭窄桥状连接单口切取APVB外,其余8例均采用供者优先的原则即距门静脉主干2～3mm处双口切断APVB.Ⅱ型变异中有2例双口切取其右前、右后支成形为一个开口后与受者门静脉主干吻合,4例右前、右后支分别与受者门静脉左、右支吻合,1例行右前、右后支间狭窄桥状组织连接单口切取后与受者门静脉主干单口吻合.Ⅲ型变异中有1例双口切取其右前、右后支分别与受者门静脉支双口吻合,1例双口切取后行新型的U形血管移植物间置与受者门静脉主干单口吻合.结果 9例受者均无门静脉狭窄或血栓、肝动脉狭窄或血栓以及肝静脉流出道狭窄等血管并发症发生.1例供者术后3 d并发门静脉血栓,手术取栓及门静脉壁修补成形后痊愈.新型的U形血管移植物间置重建术后通畅,无并发症发生.结论 成人间活体右半肝移植术中采用供者优先的原则双口切取APVB、双口吻合重建以及新型的U形血管间置等门静脉重建技术是安全可行的,未增加手术难度,且临床效果良好.     

成人间活体供肝移植中供肝的肝中静脉分配

目的 探讨成人间活体供肝移植中切取供者右半供肝(含或不含肝中静脉)的安全性及临床效果.方法 2007年6月至2008年9月,单小组实施成人间活体供肝切取手术78例;76例行右半供肝移植,其中供肝含肝中静脉30例(含肝中静脉组),不含肝中静脉46例(不含肝中静脉组).对两组供者的基本资料、手术相关资料以及术后肝功能恢复情况进行了评估和比较.结果 CT计算供者残留肝脏体积比为29.40%～50.99%;供肝重量与受者体重的比例(GRWR)为0.74%～1.76%.两组供者(含与不含肝中静脉组)在年龄、体重身高指数(BMI)、手术时间、术中失血量和输注红细胞量、拔除引流管时间、住院时间以及供者存活率方面比较,差异均无统计学意义;含肝中静脉组供者体重小于受者体重所占的比例(75.0%)明显高于不含肝中静脉组(40.0%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);含肝中静脉组切取的供肝重量、实际GRWR以及供肝冷保存时间明显低于不含肝中静脉组(P<0.05);两组供者术后肝功能恢复情况比较.差异无统计学意义.结论 供者经过严格的术前评估,切取含或不含肝中静脉的右半供肝均是安全的,临床效果满意.     

成人活体肝移植的早期经验

目的 总结成人活体肝移植的早期经验,提高活体肝移植效果.方法 回顾性分析解放军总医院肝移植中心2006年6月至2008年2月31例成人活体肝移植资料.结果 31例中慢性乙型肝炎肝硬化失代偿期8例,急性肝功能衰竭7例,肝细胞肝癌12例,肝脏紫癜病2例,肝门部胆管癌1例和Wilson 病1例.含肝中静脉(middle hepatic vein,MHV)的右半肝移植25例,不含MHV的右半肝移植3例,双供肝为含MHV的右半肝+左外叶和含MHV的右半肝+左半肝各1例,左半肝辅助性原位肝移植1例.33例供者中5例发生并发症6例次.9例受者发生并发症11例次,其中胆道并发症4例,血管并发症3例,感染性并发症3例,切口延迟愈合1例.2例肺部感染和1例全身多处曲霉菌感染者死亡.结论 活体肝移植已成为拓展供肝来源的有效途径,合理的供、受者评估,手术方式和术后处理是关键.     

儿童活体肝移植42例临床报告

目的 总结成人活体部分供肝儿童肝移植的临床疗效和经验.方法 42例儿童患者,年龄80 d至14岁.小于1岁者28例;体重3.08～45 kg,小于10kg者27例.移植前有不同程度的黄疸、腹水、营养不良和肝功能严重损害.其中父母供肝36例,祖母供肝4例.舅父和表兄供肝各1例.供肝类型包括:左外叶31例.Ⅱ段肝组织1例,左半肝8例.右半肝2例.对供肝的肝静脉、肝动脉和受者的肝动脉、肝静脉、门静脉进行成形.以便吻合;供肝动脉较短者,以供者大隐静脉搭桥.免疫抑制方案:采用环孢素A(CsA)+糖皮质激素21例,CsA+吗替麦考酚酯(MMF)+糖皮质激素8例,他克莫司(Tac)+糖皮质激素7例,Tac+MMF+糖皮质激素6例.术后随访时问2～43个月.结果 移植物与受者质量比为0.91%～5.71%,移植物与受者标准肝体积比为40.7%～137.1%.术后早期32例(76.2%,32/42)出现并发症,死亡5例,其中4例死于血管并发症;随访期9例出现并发症,死亡4例,其中3例死于血管并发症;意外死亡2例.其余31例(73.8%,31/42)健康存活.结论 成人活体部分供肝儿童肝移植是治疗儿童终末期肝病的有效方法,术后血管并发症是主要的死亡原因.预防和治疗血管并发症能明显提高手术成功率.     

成人活体肝移植单中心56例临床报告

目的探讨成人间右半肝移植手术中保证供、受者安全的方法。方法2002年1月至2006年9月四川大学华西医院对56例受者施行了成人右半肝移植,其中52例不含肝中静脉,4例双供肝肝移植。受者原发病为乙型肝炎肝硬化35例（62．5％,含急性肝功能衰竭12例）,肝细胞肝癌17例（30．4％）,其他4例;MELD评分〉25分者10例。供者常规行三维CT计算全肝体积及右半肝体积,并进行了移植手术技术改进。结果58例供者共摘取55例右半供肝及3例左半供肝。右半供肝均不含肝中静脉,重量为400—860g（中位数550g）,右半供肝与受者标准肝重比为31．7％-71．7％（中位数45．4％）,供者残肝体积均大于全肝体积的35％。58例供者发生并发症7例（12．5％）,无死亡。术后住院时间7—30d（中位数11d）。术后对56例受者随访2—52个月（中位数11个月）,发生并发症15例（26．8％）,死亡4例（7．2％）。1年实际生存率92．8％。结论采用不包含肝中静脉的右半供肝,术前CT测量残肝体积〉35％,同时右半供肝与受者标准肝重比〉40％者进行右半肝移植可保证供受者安全,反之则应考虑采用双供肝肝移植。     

活体肝移植22例临床分析

目的 总结开展活体肝移植的临床经验,探讨进一步提高活体肝移植疗效的措施.方法 回顾性分析我院22例活体肝移植供受体的临床资料,总结术前评估过程、手术方法和术后并发症的情况.结果 本组获取的供肝移植物包括左外叶2例、左半肝6例、扩大左半肝1例、右半肝5例和扩大右半肝8例.所有供体术后恢复顺利,未出现严重并发症.22例受体中成年患者13例,儿童患者9例.围手术期发生并发症8例,包括严重腹腔感染1例,肝功能恢复不良合并伤口感染1例,腹腔内出血继发肝动脉血栓形成1例,此3例患者最终均因多器官功能衰竭死亡.1例肝功能衰竭的患儿术后因心肺功能衰竭死亡.另外发生胆漏2例,顽固性腹水1例,右下肢深静脉血栓形成1例,均通过保守疗法治愈.18例受体病愈出院.手术后期发生胆道吻合口狭窄3例,行PTCD并留置支撑管治疗,Oddi括约肌失迟缓引起的梗阻性黄疸1例,行内镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术治疗.此4例患者病情稳定,肝功能均已恢复正常.结论 选择合适的供体、掌握关键的手术技术,才能使供受体都获得良好的预后.     

Lessons learned from 1,000 living donor liver transplantations in a single center: how to make living donations safe.

Serious complications have occurred in a considerable proportion of living donors of liver transplants, but data from a single high-volume center has rarely been available. We analyzed the medical records of donors and recipients of the first 1,000 living donor liver transplants, performed at Asan Medical Center from December 1994 to June 2005, with a focus on donor safety. There were 107 pediatric and 893 adult transplants. The most common diagnoses were biliary atresia in pediatric recipients (63%) and hepatitis B-associated liver cirrhosis (80%) in adult recipients. Right lobe donors were strictly selected based on liver resection rate and steatosis. From 1,162 living donors, 588 right lobes, 6 extended right lobes, 7 right posterior segments, 464 left lobes, and 107 left lateral segments were obtained. Of these, 837 grafts were implanted singly, whereas 325, along with 1 cadaveric split graft, were implanted as dual grafts into 163 recipients. The 5-yr survival rates were 84.8% in pediatric recipients and 83.2% in adult recipients. There was no donor mortality, but 3.2% of donors experienced major complications. Until the end of 2001, the major donor complication rate was 6.7%, with most occurring in right liver donors. Since 2002, liver resection exceeding 65% of whole liver volume were avoided except for young donors with no hepatic steatosis, and the donor complication rate has been reduced to 1.3%. In conclusion, a majority of major living donor complications appear to be avoidable through the strict selection of living donor and graft type, intensive postoperative surveillance, and timely feedback of surgical techniques. Selection of right lobe graft should be very prudently considered if the donor right liver appears to be larger than 65% of the whole liver volume.     

活体肝移植治疗HBV相关性急性亚急性肝功能衰竭

目的 探讨活体肝移植(living donor liver transplantation,LDLT)HBV感染导致的急性肝功能衰竭(acute liver failure,ALF)和亚急性肝功能衰竭(subacute liver failure,SALF)患者的可行性,并评价其疗效.方法 回顾性分析2000年11月至2007年10月完成的10例LDLT治疗ALF、SALF患者的临床资料.10例LDLT的供、受者均为成人,切取右半肝为移植物,8例含肝中静脉(middle hepatic vein,MHV).10例供者的评估均在确定实施LDLT的24 h内完成,供、受者手术均在确定供者后的12 h内完成.移植物质量与受者体质量比为(1.03±0.17)%(0.86%～1.22%),移植物体积与受者标准肝体积比为(52.2±11.8)%(47.6%～70.1%).结果 10例受者中,2例分别于术后7、28 d时因肺部感染、十二指肠球部溃疡穿孔腹腔感染死亡.1例胆管吻合口胆漏,经十二指肠镜下置入鼻胆管引流治愈.2例术后1周出现轻度急性排斥反应,增强免疫抑制强度后肝功能恢复正常.8例中位随访期9.6个月(2～84个月),生存质量优良.10例供者中,1例出现急性门静脉高压症导致脾脏破裂,行脾脏切除术,其后出现胆管断端胆漏,经鼻胆管引流结合经皮穿刺腹腔引流治愈.其余9例无并发症发生.结论 LDLT适宜治疗HBV感染导致的ALF、SALF,而且能获得较好的中、远期疗效.     

Donor and recipient outcomes in right lobe adult living donor liver transplantation

Severe donor organ shortage has provided the impetus for adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT). Despite rapid implementation and expansion of the procedure, outcome analysis of ALDLT is still incomplete. This study analyzed both donor and recipient outcomes after ALDLT at a single center. ALDLT performed at UCLA between August 1999 and November 2001 were reviewed retrospectively. Twenty recipients (14 men and 6 women) with a mean age of 48.8 ± 9.7 (29 to 66) years underwent right lobe ALDLT. By computed tomograpy (CT), graft/recipient weight ratio (GRWR) was 1.3 ± 0.3 (1 to 2.2). Overall 1-year patient and graft survival rates were 95% and 85%, respectively. One recipient died of heart failure with normal liver function 5 months after transplantation. Three grafts (14%) were lost and all three patients underwent successful cadaveric retransplantation. Complications were classified according to the Clavien grading system with all but 3 recipients encountering at least one complication. Nine (45%) had grade 1 (minor), 10 (50%) had grade 2 (potentially life threatening without residual disease/disability), 3 (14%) had grade 4A (retransplantation) and one grade 4B (death). Right lobectomy for living donation was performed in 20 patients (12 men, 8 women). Residual left lobe volumes were 36 ± 5.3 (23.9 to 47.9)% of total donor liver volume. No donor required intensive care unit admission and median hospital stay was 7.5 (6 to 14) days. One donor was aborted after intraoperative biopsy showed > 50% macrovesicular steatosis. No donor mortality or long-term complications were encountered. Five grade 1 minor complications, by Clavien Classification, occurred in 4 of 20 (20%) donors. ALDLT using right lobe grafts is an effective procedure to expand a severely depleted donor, but is associated with a high complication rate despite good survival outcomes. Continuous standardized reporting of ALDLT outcomes is required to allow successful and safe implementation of the procedure. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:901-909.)     

Donor quality of life before and after adult-to-adult right liver live donor liver transplantation.

Donor right hepatectomy for adult-to-adult live donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) is a major surgical operation for the benefit of the recipient. Justification of procedure mandates knowledge of the possible physical and psychological negative effects on the donor. We prospectively and longitudinally quantified donor quality of life using generic and condition-specific questionnaires up to 1 year. The generic questionnaires were the Karnofsky Performance Status scale and the Chinese (Hong Kong) version of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Survey, which measures 8 health concepts: 4 physical components and 4 mental components. Within 1 year, 30 consecutive donors were included. These 11 male and 19 female donors (36.7% and 63.3%, respectively) had a median age of 35 years (range, 21-56 years). There was no donor mortality or major complications. Donor quality-of-life worsening was most significant in the first 3 postoperative months, particularly among the physical components. The physical and mental components returned to the previous levels in 6 to 12 months' time, though the Karnofsky performance scores were slightly lower at 1 year (P = 0.011). Twenty-six (86.7%) donors declared that they would donate again if there were such a need and it were technically possible. It was noticed that older donors were more likely to express unwillingness to donate again. In conclusion, the temporary worsening of donor quality of life substantiates ALDLT as an acceptable treatment modality.     

Intrahepatic venous anastomosis formation of the right liver in living donor liver transplantation: evaluations by Doppler ultrasonography and pulse-inversion ultrasonography with Levovist

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to investigate the development of intrahepatic venous anastomoses between the middle hepatic vein (MHV) and the right hepatic vein (RHV) in adult-to-adult, living donor, liver transplantation. METHODS: Using Doppler ultrasonography, we studied the formation of venous anastomoses between the MHV tributaries for segments 5 and 8 (V5, V8) and the RHV in the liver remnants of 7 donors of a left liver, including the MHV, and in the liver grafts of 8 recipients of a right liver, without including the MHV. In 1 donor and 5 recipients, we performed pulse-inversion ultrasonography with a microbubble contrast agent to evaluate hepatic parenchymal perfusion in the drainage region of the MHV. RESULTS: We observed 15 MHV tributaries of V5 and 13 of V8 among the 15 adult transplant patients. During the first postoperative week, we detected venous anastomosis between V5 and the RHV in 4 patients and in 10 patients between V8 and the RHV. After the 1st week, we observed the formation of anastomosis between V5 and the RHV in 10 patients, and between V8 and the RHV in 3. In both MHV tributaries, the mean flow velocities increased (P < .01). By the end of the 1st week, the formation rate in V8 was higher than in V5 (77% vs 27%, P < .03). In the parenchymal phase of the pulse-inversion ultrasonography with the microbubble contrast agent, the V5 drainage region had low intensities, while the V8 drainage territory revealed high intensities in 4 of 6 patients (66.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Functional venous anastomoses between either V5 or V8 and the RHV developed in most of the donors of left hepatic lobes and in recipients of right hepatic lobes; however, anastomoses developed earlier in V8 than in V5. Furthermore, perfusion was decreased in the drainage area of V5, compared with V8.