Efficacy and safety of dry powder fluticasone propionate in children with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Flovent Diskus is a powder formulation of the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) delivered via a breath-actuated, multidose inhaler. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of dry powder FP administered once or twice daily (200 microg per day) to children with persistent asthma. METHODS: Twelve-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial with a 52-week, open-label extension. Children aged 4 to 11 were required to have pulmonary function 50% to 85% of predicted values. The population was stratified for baseline therapy (inhaled corticosteroid/cromolyn or bronchodilators only). After a 2-week placebo run-in, 242 patients received dry powder FP 200 microg each morning, dry powder FP 100 microg BID, or placebo for 12 weeks; 192 were rerandomized to the QD or BID regimen for an additional 52 weeks of open-label treatment. Primary endpoints were mean changes in FEV1 and morning PEF recorded at clinic visits. RESULTS: Both dry powder FP regimens significantly improved FEV1, evening PEF, and asthma symptoms at the double-blind phase endpoint (P < or = .017 compared with placebo). The BID regimen also significantly improved morning PEF and nighttime awakenings due to asthma (P < or = .005). Among patients previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids/cromolyn, improvements observed with the QD and BID regimens were similar. Patients switched from BID to open-label QD treatment showed additional improvements at week 52 generally comparable to patients who received the BID regimen during both phases. Fluticasone propionate was well tolerated for up to 64 weeks with few reports of drug-related adverse events or morning plasma cortisol abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily dosing of dry powder FP 200 microg is an effective and convenient alternative for children whose asthma is controlled with a more frequent dosing regimen of inhaled corticosteroids.     

Mometasone furoate administered once daily is as effective as twice-daily administration for treatment of mild-to-moderate persistent asthma

BACKGROUND: Despite current recommendations, many patients with persistent asthma are still treated with bronchodilators alone. OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy of two once daily dosing regimens (200 microg and 400 microg) of mometasone furoate (MF) administered in the morning by using a dry-powder inhaler (DPI) were compared with those of a twice daily dosing regimen (200 microg administered twice daily) in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma previously taking only inhaled beta(2)-adrenergic agonists. METHODS: All patients (306 patients; age range, 12-70 years) were given a diagnosis of asthma for at least 6 months before enrollment in this 12-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study. The primary efficacy variable was change in FEV(1) from baseline to endpoint (last evaluable visit). RESULTS: At endpoint, FEV(1) was significantly improved (P < or =.02) after MF-DPI 400 microg once daily morning treatment and MF-DPI 200 microg twice daily treatment (16.0% and 16.1%, respectively) compared with placebo (5.5%). The improvement seen with MF-DPI 200 microg once daily morning treatment (10.4%) was not significantly different from that with placebo. Secondary efficacy variables also showed significant improvement for the MF-DPI 400 microg once daily morning treatment group and the MF-DPI 200 microg twice daily treatment group compared with the placebo group. All doses of MF administered by means of a DPI were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to demonstrate that a total daily dose of 400 microg of MF administered by means of a DPI is an effective treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma previously taking only inhaled beta(2)-adrenergic agonists. This treatment was equally effective when administered either as a once daily or twice daily regimen.     

Step-down therapy with low-dose fluticasone-salmeterol combination or medium-dose hydrofluoroalkane 134a-beclomethasone alone

BACKGROUND: Options for step-down therapy include use of inhaled corticosteroids alone or in combination with a long-acting beta2-agonist. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate step-down therapy with a fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (FP-SM) combination administered through a dry powder inhaler (DPI; Advair Diskus) versus a medium dose of hydrofluoroalkane 143a-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) administered through a breath-actuated pressurized metered-dose inhaler (QVAR Autohaler). METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma were treated with 1000 microg of DPI-administered BDP twice daily (DPI-BDP) for 4 weeks and then randomized to 200 microg of HFA-BDP twice daily (n = 20) or 100 microg of FP and 50 microg of SM twice daily (FM-SM; n = 19) for 8 weeks in a double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group design. We measured the provocative dose of methacholine producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (methacholine PD20) as the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes being lung function, surrogate inflammatory markers, diary card responses, quality of life, and safety. RESULTS: There was a 0.9 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-1.2) doubling dose improvement in methacholine PD20 comparing asthma before versus after DPI-BDP. HFA-BDP maintained this improvement, whereas FP-SM produced a further significant improvement, amounting to a 1.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-2.1) doubling dose difference at 8 weeks for FP-SM versus HFA-BDP. Effects on FEV1, peak expiratory flow, and quality of life (symptoms and emotions) were similar to those on methacholine PD20, with a significant difference between FP-SM and HFA-BDP. Suppression of plasma and urinary cortisol and serum osteocalcin levels occurred with DPI-BDP, but values returned to baseline levels within 1 month of HFA-BDP or FP-SM administration. CONCLUSION: After high-dose inhaled corticosteroid, stepping down with the combination inhaler conferred further improvements in bronchoprotection, bronchodilatation, and clinical control, but not inflammatory markers, compared with that seen with a medium dose of inhaled corticosteroid.     

Intranasal and inhaled fluticasone propionate for pollen-induced rhinitis and asthma

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that nasal treatment might influence lower airway symptoms and function in patients with comorbid rhinitis and asthma. We investigated the effect of intranasal, inhaled corticosteroid or the combination of both in patients with both pollen-induced rhinitis and asthma. METHODS: A total of 262 patients were randomized to 6 weeks' treatment with intranasal fluticasone propionate (INFP) 200 microg o.d., inhaled fluticasone propionate (IHFP) 250 microg b.i.d., their combination, or intranasal or inhaled placebo, in a multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group study. Treatment was started 2 weeks prior to the pollen season and patients recorded their nasal and bronchial symptoms twice daily. Before and after 4 and 6 weeks' treatment, the patients were assessed for lung function, methacholine responsiveness, and induced sputum cell counts. RESULTS: Intranasal fluticasone propionate significantly increased the percentages of patients reporting no nasal blockage, sneezing, or rhinorrhoea during the pollen season, compared with IHFP or intranasal or inhaled placebo. In contrast, only IHFP significantly improved morning peak-flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and methacholine PD20, and the seasonal increase in the sputum eosinophils and methacholine responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pollen-induced rhinitis and asthma, the combination of intranasal and IHFP is needed to control the seasonal increase in nasal and asthmatic symptoms.     

Mometasone furoate: efficacy and safety in moderate asthma compared with beclomethasone dipropionate.

BACKGROUND: Mometasone furoate (MF) is a new inhaled glucocorticoid administered by dry powder inhaler (DPI). OBJECTIVE: MF-DPI was evaluated for safety and efficacy and compared with placebo DPI and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) administered by metered dose inhaler (MDI) in the treatment of patients with moderate persistent asthma. METHODS: Eligible patients (n = 227), 13 to 75 years of age, maintained on inhaled glucocorticoids before entering the trial, were randomized to receive: MF-DPI, 100 microg, twice daily, MF-DPI, 200 microg, twice daily, BDP MDI, 168 microg, twice daily, or placebo in a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind study. RESULTS: At endpoint, FEV1 (primary efficacy variable) significantly improved for all three active treatments compared with placebo (P < .01, all comparisons). The response to MF-DPI, 200 microg, twice daily treatment was approximately twice as large as the response to MF-DPI, 100 microg, twice daily or BDP MDI treatment, although the differences between these groups did not reach statistical significance. Secondary efficacy variables including PEFR, asthma symptoms, nocturnal awakenings, and albuterol use showed similar trends. The MF-DPI, 100 microg, twice daily and BDP MDI, 168 microg, twice daily treatment groups produced comparable results for all efficacy variables. CONCLUSIONS: MF-DPI, 100 microg and 200 microg, twice daily were well-tolerated and significantly improved lung function and symptom control in the treatment of patients with moderate persistent asthma. In this study, MF-DPI, 200 microg, twice daily seemed to be the most effective dosage.     

Once-daily budesonide inhalation powder (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) maintains pulmonary function and symptoms of asthmatic children previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of pediatric asthma has increased dramatically over the past few decades, with approximately 5% of American children affected by the disease. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler with placebo in asthmatic children previously treated with orally inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter (17 centers) study included 274 male and female children (aged 6 to 17 years) with a history of asthma for at least the previous 6 months. Patients received placebo or budesonide Turbuhaler (200 microg or 400 microg) once daily for 12 weeks. Efficacy variables included mean changes from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), AM and PM peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs), nighttime and daytime asthma symptom severity scores, patient discontinuations, use of beta2-agonists as breakthrough medication, forced vital capacity (FVC), and midexpiratory flow rate between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25%-75%). Safety was evaluated by adverse events, physical examinations, vital signs, and laboratory tests. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable among treatment groups. Percentage of predicted FEV1 at baseline was 76.6 +/- 6.9 for placebo, 77.5 +/- 7.1, and 77.0 +/- 7.8 for the budesonide Turbuhaler 200 microg and 400 microg groups, respectively. Significantly (P < or = 0.024) more placebo patients (24%) discontinued treatment because of disease deterioration or no improvement than budesonide Turbuhaler 200 microg (11%) or 400 microg patients (10%). Patients receiving budesonide Turbuhaler experienced significant improvements in FEV1 compared with patients receiving placebo (P < or = 0.015). Significant (P < or = 0.041) improvements over placebo also were observed in AM and PM PEFRs, FVC, FEF25%-75%, nighttime and daytime asthma symptoms, and amount of beta2-agonist used in both budesonide Turbuhaler groups. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate in intensity and similar among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler is effective and safe in children with persistent asthma previously maintained on at least twice-daily dosing regimens of inhaled corticosteroids.     

Comparison of once-daily to twice-daily treatment with mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler.

BACKGROUND: Once-daily dosing with an effective inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) would likely enhance compliance and, therefore, aid in the management of asthma. OBJECTIVE: Several once-daily dosing regimens of mometasone furoate (MF) administered by dry powder inhaler (DPI) were compared with a twice-daily dosing regimen in 286 patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma who were previously being treated with ICS. METHODS: During a 2-week open-label phase, patients received MF-DPI, 200 microg twice daily. They were then randomized to continue MF-DPI, 200 microg twice-daily treatment or to receive MF-DPI, 200 microg once daily in the morning (AM), 200 microg once daily in the evening (PM), 400 microg once daily AM, or placebo as part of the 12-week, double-blind phase. The primary efficacy variable was the mean change from the baseline to endpoint (last evaluable observation) for FEV1. RESULTS: Once-daily MF-DPI, 400 microg, AM maintained FEV1, and morning peak expiratory flow rate, FVC, FEF25%-75%, and asthma symptom scores, at levels similar to those for MF-DPI, 200 microg twice daily and significantly better than placebo. Once-daily MF-DPI, 200 microg, PM was effective in maintaining pulmonary function, but was less effective on other efficacy measures. In comparison to the other MF-DPI groups, once-daily MF-DPI, 200 microg, AM was not as effective overall. The incidence of local adverse events, including oral candidiasis, was low with all dosages. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily MF-DPI, 400 microg, AM was as effective as MF-DPI, 200 microg twice daily, whereas once-daily MF-DPI, 200 microg, was more effective when administered in the evening compared with morning, for patients receiving ICS therapy. Once-daily dosing offers an effective and convenient treatment that could aid compliance in the treatment of asthma.     

A six-month, placebo-controlled comparison of the safety and efficacy of salmeterol or beclomethasone for persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data comparing the long-term safety and efficacy of long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists versus low-dose inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of salmeterol xinafoate, beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), and placebo over a 6-month treatment period in patients with persistent asthma. METHODS: Salmeterol (42 microg twice daily), BDP (84 microg four times daily), or placebo was administered via metered-dose inhaler to 386 adolescent and adult inhaled corticosteroid-naive patients in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. Eligible patients demonstrated a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from 65% to 90% of predicted values. Pulmonary function, symptom control, frequency of asthma exacerbations, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to methacholine challenge, and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: There were few statistically significant differences between the two active treatments over 6 months of therapy. Asthma symptoms and lung function were significantly improved with both salmeterol and BDP compared with placebo (changes from baseline in FEV1 of 0.28 L (SE = 0.04) and 0.23 L (SE = 0.04), respectively, compared with 0.08 L (SE = 0.04); P < or = .014). There were no significant differences among the treatment groups with respect to the distribution of asthma exacerbations over time. Both salmeterol and BDP significantly reduced BHR compared with placebo (P < or = .033; changes from baseline of 1.29 (SE = 0.26) and 1.42 (SE = 0.24) doubling doses at 6 months, respectively, compared with 0.24 (SE = 0.29) doubling dose for placebo). No rebound effect in BHR was seen upon cessation of any of the three treatment regimens. There were no clinically important differences in the safety profiles among the three treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Both salmeterol and BDP are effective and well-tolerated when administered for 6 months to inhaled corticosteroid-naive patients with persistent asthma.     

Lack of relationship between eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil protein X in nasal lavage and urine and the severity of childhood asthma in a 6-month follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and eosinophil protein X (EPX) may be valuable markers of airway inflammation in various body fluids of asthmatic children. Most of these studies have relied on a single measure of inflammatory markers. OBJECTIVE: We measured ECP and EPX in nasal lavage fluids (NALF) and urine samples in children with asthma over a 6-month period to study the relationship between inflammatory markers and clinical severity. METHODS: Fourteen children with mild persisting asthma (mean age 11.7 years, SD 2.2) were recruited. All patients were on therapy including inhaled steroids. For a 6-month period asthma severity was monitored by at least monthly physical examination and pulmonary function tests. Daily morning and evening PEF, asthma symptoms and medication were recorded in diaries for the whole study period. Telephone interviews were performed between visits and additional visits were done in case of an increase in asthmatic symptoms or drop of PEF values under 80% of best value. An exacerbation was defined by a fall of FEV1 > 10% and an increase in asthma symptoms and additional need of beta2-agonist. NALF and urine samples were obtained at each visit and analysed for ECP (NALF only) and EPX. RESULTS: Mean observation time was 186.4 days (SD 19.8). Thirteen patients completed the study. During the study period 11 exacerbations were observed in six patients. No significant associations between PEF, PEF variability (amplitude % of mean), daily symptoms, additional beta2-agonist, FEV1 and MEF50 and nasal ECP, nasal EPX and urinary EPX were found. However, at exacerbations an average increase of nasal ECP (9.3 vs 50.3 microg/L) and EPX (nasal EPX 36.4 vs 141.7 microg/L, urinary EPX 46.4 vs 74.1 microg/mmol creatinine) was observed. CONCLUSION: Serial measurements of ECP and EPX in NALF and urine samples do not provide additional information for the practical management in monitoring childhood asthma.     

Induced sputum in children with newly diagnosed mild asthma: the effect of 6 months of treatment with budesonide or disodium cromoglycate

BACKGROUND: There are few controlled studies on the effects of anti-inflammatory treatment on airway inflammation in newly diagnosed childhood asthma. METHODS: Sixty children with newly diagnosed mild persistent asthma, 5-10 years of age, and 17 healthy control subjects were studied. Asthmatic children were randomized into an open study with two treatment groups: (1) budesonide 400 microg twice daily for 1 month, 200 microg twice daily for 5 months and (2) disodium cromoglycate (DSCG) 10 mg three-times daily for 6 months. All exacerbations were treated with budesonide 400 microg twice daily for 2 weeks. Symptoms and lung function were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: Sputum induction was safe and the overall success rate was 71%. This improved with age and decreased after treatment. At baseline, the asthmatic children had more eosinophils in blood (0.26 vs 0.18 x 10(9)/l, P = 0.03) and sputum (1.1 vs 0.0 %, P = 0.0001) than the control subjects. The numbers of sputum eosinophils correlated with bronchial responsiveness (R = -0.58, P = 0.0002). Eosinophils were higher in children with atopic asthma than with nonatopic asthma (P < 0.0001), and in children with a history wheezing than in children without wheezing (P = 0.02). Six months of budesonide treatment, but not of DSCG, improved lung function (P = 0.007), decreased symptoms (P = 0.007) and sputum eosinophils (P = 0.003). The effects of budesonide were pronounced in children with intense sputum eosinophilia (>3%). CONCLUSION: Sputum eosinophilia is present in children with newly diagnosed mild persistent asthma. Treatment with inhaled budesonide, but not with DSCG, decreases sputum eosinophils along with clinical and functional improvement.     

Determinants of airway hyperresponsiveness in mild asthma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with mild asthma may have coexisting severe airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), although the reasons for this are uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the factors that determine AHR in mild asthma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective database evaluation of two groups of patients with mild asthma with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 80% or more than predicted. Group A (n = 92; mean inhaled corticosteroid dose, 491 microg) had moderate-to-severe AHR to methacholine (provocative dose causing a 20% decrease in FEV1 [methacholine PD20], < or = 100 microg), whereas group B (n = 92; mean inhaled corticosteroid dose, 509 microg) had borderline AHR (methacholine PD20, > or = 800 microg). Both groups were matched for age, sex, inhaled corticosteroid use, and FEV1. RESULTS: From our database, we found 361 patients with an FEV1 of 80% or more than predicted of whom 123 (34%) had a methacholine PD20 of 100 microg or less and 138 (38%) had a methacholine PD20 of 800 microg or more. The methacholine PD20 geometric means (geometric SE) of groups A and B were 25 microg (3 microg) and 5,392 microg (295 microg), respectively. Despite matched mean values for FEV1, compared with group B, group A had a lower predicted forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% (71% vs 81%, P = 0.007). A greater proportion of group A compared with group B patients were sensitized to house-dust mite (76% vs 54%, P = 0.002). No significant differences were found between groups in terms of presence of rhinitis and sensitization to other individual aeroallergens. CONCLUSIONS: Increased sensitization to house-dust mite and reduced small airway caliber were associated with moderate-to-severe AHR in mild asthma. Skin prick testing to common aeroallergens, especially house-dust mite, should be a routine part in the evaluation of asthmatic patients, including those patients with mild disease.     

Effective control of asthma with hydrofluoroalkane flunisolide delivered as an extrafine aerosol in asthma patients.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids are established as maintenance therapy for persistent asthma. A new aerosol formulation of flunisolide delivers a small particle size by using a hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellant with a built-in spacer. OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and safety of two different flunisolide formulations, HFA and chlorofluorocarbon (CFC), with placebo treatment over a range of doses. METHODS: The multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial consisted of a 2-week, active run-in phase with CFC flunisolide 500 microg, twice daily, followed by 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with placebo, HFA flunisolide (85, 170, or 340 microg, twice daily), or CFC flunisolide (250, 500, or 1,000 microg, twice daily). Patients (N = 669) were nonsmokers, at least 12 years of age, with mild to moderate asthma who were being treated with inhaled corticosteroids. Outcome measures were change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow rate, as needed albuterol use, nocturnal awakenings, and asthma symptoms. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, patients receiving 170 microg, twice daily, and 340 microg, twice daily, of HFA flunisolide showed a significant (P < 0.01) improvement in percentage increase in FEV1 (12.22% at 170 microg, twice daily, and 14.69% at 340 microg, twice daily) compared with the placebo group (5.35%). At one-third the dose of CFC flunisolide, HFA flunisolide provided similar improvement in pulmonary function versus placebo. Both formulations demonstrated comparable linear dose dependency for the change from baseline in FEV1 without any evidence of cortisol suppression. Outcome values for all seven secondary efficacy measures were numerically superior in patients receiving HFA flunisolide compared with the CFC formulation. Both formulations seemed to be safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: HFA flunisolide provides comparable efficacy and safety at one-third the dose of CFC flunisolide.     

Long-term asthma control with oral montelukast and inhaled beclomethasone for adults and children 6 years and older

BACKGROUND: Leukotriene receptor antagonists have demonstrated clinical benefits in chronic asthma studies of up to 3 months in duration. The effects of these agents over extended periods of time have not been reported. OBJECTIVE: To describe the long-term effect of oral montelukast, a potent and specific cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, compared with inhaled corticosteroids in both adult and paediatric patients with chronic asthma. METHODS: Male and female patients with chronic, stable asthma (adults aged 15-85 years, children aged 6-14 years), who had completed double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies, participated in three extension studies with oral montelukast taken once daily (10 mg tablet for adults, 5 mg chewable tablet for paediatric patients) or inhaled corticosteroids (beclomethasone 200 microg twice daily for adults, beclomethasone 100 microg or equivalent three times daily for children). A double-blind adult extension study was 37 weeks in duration; open-label adult extension studies were 156 (adults) and 112 (paediatric) weeks in duration. A total of 436, 374, and 245 patients entered these extension studies, respectively. RESULTS: Treatment with both montelukast and inhaled corticosteroids resulted in improvement in multiple parameters of asthma control. Improvements in daytime symptom scores were generally comparable among treatment groups. No tachyphylaxis to the effects of montelukast was evident. In the adult open-label study, however, the effect of beclomethasone on mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) gradually decreased from start of the study to the end of the follow-up treatment period. CONCLUSION: Both montelukast and inhaled corticosteroids were effective in controlling mild to moderate chronic asthma; the relative effectiveness of montelukast and beclomethasone were similar in open-label conditions. The hypothesis, that clinical practice conditions (e.g., adherence) may have a significant impact on the effectiveness of these therapies, should be tested in future clinical trials.     

Differential effects of fluticasone and montelukast on allergen-induced asthma

Early asthmatic responses (EAR) and late asthmatic responses (LAR) to allergen are induced by the local release of a series of bronchoconstrictor mediators, including leukotrienes and histamine. Both anti-leukotrienes and other anti-asthma drugs, such as inhaled glucocorticoids, have been shown to reduce both EAR and LAR. The aim of the present study was to directly compare the effects of regular treatment with an oral anti-leukotriene, montelukast (Mont; 10 mg once daily, for 8 days), and an inhaled glucocorticoid [fluticasone propionate (FP) 250 microg twice daily for 8 days] on the EAR and LAR to an inhaled allergen challenge. Patients with a documented EAR and LAR at a screening visit were randomized to these treatments, or placebo, in a double-blind, double-dummy, crossover fashion. Allergen challenge at a dose causing both an EAR and LAR was given on the eighth day of treatment. The maximum fall in FEV1 during the EAR was 17.8% during placebo treatment, 8.3% during Mont and 16.3% during FP (P <0.05 for Mont vs placebo). The maximum fall during the EAR was 13.8% during placebo treatment, 11.8% during Mont and 2% during FP treatment (P <0.05 for FP vs placebo and FP vs Mont). PC20 methacholine was significantly higher 24 h after allergen challenge during FP-treatment compared with Mont (P <0.05). Both montelukast and fluticasone reduced the relative amount of sputum eosinophils after allergen compared with placebo treatment. This study shows that anti-leukotrienes are effective to attenuate the EAR, whereas inhaled glucocorticoids are more effective than anti-leukotrienes in attenuating the EARs and improves bronchial hyperresponsiveness to a greater extent. In conclusion, inhaled glucocorticoids have overall greater efficacy than oral anti-leukotrienes to attenuate allergen-induced airway responses in mild asthmatic patients.     

Tapering dose of inhaled budesonide in subjects with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma treated with montelukast: a 16-week single-blind randomized study

Pharmacological therapy with inhaled steroids (IS) is currently considered the gold-standard of treatment for mild-persistent asthma. Leukotriene receptor antagonist drugs (LTRAs) play an important role associated with IS, allowing dose tapering and maintaining control of asthma symptoms. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of montelukast (MON) to allow tapering of the inhaled dose of budesonide (BUD) in patients with mild-moderate persistent asthma. This 16-wk single-blind randomized study included 40 asthmatic patients divided in 2 treatment groups. After a run-in period (4 wk), in which all patients inhaled 400 microg of BUD twice daily (bid), group A (20 patients) received MON (oral, 10 mg/day) combined with inhaled BUD (400 microg/bid), while group B (20 patients) was treated with BUD for the whole period of the study. In both groups, at every 4 wk the dose of BUD was halved. After 12 wk of treatment the mean value of forced expiratory volume during the first sec (FEV1, as % of predicted value) was significantly greater in group A compared with group B (94 +/- 7.5 vs 83.1 +/- 6.9; p<0.005). The mean values of peak expiratory flow (PEF), the percentages of asthmatic exacerbations, and the use of beta2-short-acting agonist (SABA) were similar in the 2 groups at 4, 8, and 12 wk. In conclusion, in patients with mild-moderate persistent asthma, MON therapy is useful in tapering the dose of IS in order to reduce its side effects and to maintain the clinical stability of the disease.     

Comparison of roflumilast, an oral anti-inflammatory, with beclomethasone dipropionate in the treatment of persistent asthma

BACKGROUND: Roflumilast is an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor with anti-inflammatory activity in development for the treatment of asthma. Roflumilast was compared with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in patients with asthma. METHODS: In a double blind, double-dummy, randomized, noninferiority study, 499 patients (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] = 50-85% predicted) received roflumilast 500 microg once daily or BDP 200 microg twice daily (400 microg/day) for 12 weeks. Lung function and adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Roflumilast and BDP significantly improved FEV1 by 12% (270 +/- 30 ml) and 14% (320 +/- 30 ml), respectively (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). Roflumilast and BDP also significantly improved forced vital capacity (FVC) (P < 0.0001 vs baseline). There were no significant differences between roflumilast and BDP with regard to improvement in FEV1 and FVC. Roflumilast and BDP showed small improvements in median asthma symptom scores (-0.82 and -1.00, respectively) and reduced rescue medication use (-1.00 and -1.15 median puffs/day, respectively; P < 0.0001 vs baseline). These small differences between roflumilast and BDP were not considered clinically relevant. Both agents were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily, oral roflumilast 500 microg was comparable with inhaled twice-daily BDP (400 microg/day) in improving pulmonary function and asthma symptoms, and reducing rescue medication use in patients with asthma.     

Body composition and growth in asthmatic children treated with inhaled steroids.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged treatment with inhaled steroids is recommended for long-term control of asthma in children; however, it can interfere with growth and body composition. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to answer the question whether 6 months treatment with inhaled steroids causes body fat accumulation and growth velocity reduction. METHODS: Hospital-based, open study of body composition [by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and skinfolds] and growth of 26 asthmatic children, treated for 6 months with inhaled steroids [budesonide (BUD) 400 microg/day (group 1) or fluticasone proprionate (FP) 200 microg/day (group 2)], sodium cromoglycate and beta2-agonist (salbutamol) compared with a control group of 16 asthmatic children treated only with sodium cromoglycate and beta2-agonist. RESULTS: On average, total and regional fat mass, adjusted for pubertal stage and gender, and growth velocity were similar in all three groups of patients and were not influenced by treatment (% mean change +/- 1 SD of fat mass during treatment in BUD 0.1 +/- 3.0%, FP -1.1 +/- 3%, and control -2.8 +/- 3.5%; ANOVA P > or = .05); however seven patients, two in group 1 (1 preschool child), three in group 2 (2 preschool children) and two in the control group (two prepubertal boys aged 8.5 and 9.5 year), during treatment, showed a growth velocity standard deviation score below the third percentile. CONCLUSION: A 6-month treatment with inhaled BUD and FP does not induce body fat accumulation; however, in a few preschool children the treatment was associated with growth velocity below the third percentile. Our results suggest the need for constant monitoring of growth in all asthmatic children on chronic treatment with inhaled steroids. Further studies devoted to the effects of inhaled steroids use in preschool children are needed.     

Increased risk of asthma attacks and emergency visits among asthma patients with allergic rhinitis: a subgroup analysis of the improving asthma control trial

BACKGROUND: Inadequately controlled allergic rhinitis (AR) in asthmatic patients can contribute towards increased asthma exacerbations and poorer symptom control, which may increase medical resource use. We assessed asthma-related medical resource use and attacks in asthmatic patients who did and did not have concomitant AR and were adding montelukast or salmeterol to baseline treatment with inhaled fluticasone. METHODS: A post hoc resource use analysis of a 52-week, double-blind multicentre clinical trial (Investigation of Montelukast as a Partner Agent for Complementary Therapy) [corrected] including 1490 adults with chronic asthma, aged 15-72 years, with FEV(1) 50-90% of predicted and > or =12% increase in FEV(1) after salbutamol administration, treated with either montelukast 10 mg daily or salmeterol 50 microg twice daily in addition to fluticasone 200 microg, was undertaken. Asthma-related medical resource use included medical visits (defined as either an unscheduled visit [to a general practitioner, a specialist or a non-medical provider] or a specialist visit), emergency room visits and hospitalizations during follow-up. Asthma attacks were defined as the worsening of asthma requiring unscheduled visit, emergency visit, hospitalization or oral/intravenous/intramuscular corticosteroids. RESULTS: A self-reported history of concomitant AR was identified in 60% of the patients (n=893). Univariate analysis suggests that significantly more patients with concomitant AR experienced emergency room visits (3.6% vs. 1.7%, P=0.029) and asthma attacks (21.3% vs. 17.1%, P=0.046). Multivariate analysis adjusting for treatment group, age and baseline asthma severity confirmed these results since the presence of concomitant AR in patients with asthma increases the likelihood of emergency room visit (odds ratio (OR)=2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.12-4.80) and asthma attack (OR=1.35, 95% CI=1.03-1.77). Patients with asthma alone compared with patients with both conditions did not differ in terms of unscheduled or specialist visits and hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of self-reported concomitant AR in patients with asthma resulted in a higher rate of asthma attacks and more emergency room visits compared with asthma patients without concomitant AR.     

Switching from conventional to extrafine aerosol beclomethasone dipropionate therapy in children: a 6-month,open- label,randomized trial

BACKGROUND: In adults with asthma, hydrofluoralkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) extrafine aerosol provides equivalent asthma control at half the daily dose of conventional chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-BDP. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy and tolerability of switching from CFC-BDP to HFA-BDP at half the daily dose in children with stable asthma. METHODS: This 6-month, open-label, randomized, multicenter study enrolled 520 children aged 5 to 11 years with well-controlled asthma receiving inhaled CFC-BDP or budesonide 200 to 800 microg/d x. (Four hundred fifty-two patients were using doses within the recommended range of 200-400 microg and were analyzed separately.) During a 4-week run-in period, patients used CFC-BDP plus a spacer (CFC-BDP+S) at approximately the same dose as they were using before study entry. Patients were then randomized in a 1:3 ratio to continue on CFC-BDP+S or switch to HFA-BDP Autohaler at half the daily dose. RESULTS: The change from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow was significantly greater in patients receiving 100-200 microg of HFA-BDP compared with those receiving 200-400 microg of CFC-BDP+S at weeks 7 to 8 (8.5 and 0.4 L/min, respectively; P =.014), with continuing improvement in both groups over 6 months (12.2 and 12.4 L/min, respectively, at month 6). There were no significant differences between treatments in mean change from baseline in FEV(1), percentage of days or nights without asthma symptoms, and daily beta-agonist use over the 6-month treatment period. The proportion of patients who had one or more asthma exacerbations, the incidence of adverse events, and the percentage change from baseline in 24-hour urinary free cortisol levels were similar in the 2 treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that asthma control can be well maintained in children when switching from CFC-BDP+S to an HFA-BDP Autohaler at doses as low as 100 to 200 microg/d.     

The effect of inhaled salmeterol on methacholine responsiveness in subjects with asthma up to 12 hours.

The duration of the protective effect of 50 and 100 micrograms of inhaled salmeterol against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction was compared with that of 200 micrograms of inhaled salbutamol in 12 patients with asthma with a baseline FEV1 of at least 70% and a provocative concentration of inhaled methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) greater than or equal to 8 mg/ml. The study was placebo controlled, double blind, randomized, and crossover. The bronchodilating effect was no longer significant 4 hours after inhalation of salbutamol, whereas the effect was still present 12 hours after administration of 50 and 100 micrograms of salmeterol. All active treatments caused PC20 to increase at 1 hour (p less than 0.05). PC20 (milligrams per milliliter) thus reached 3.7 +/- 0.8 after placebo, 13.8 +/- 3.0 after 50 micrograms of salmeterol, 23.2 +/- 4.7 after 100 micrograms of salmeterol, and 13.9 +/- 3.4 after 200 micrograms of salbutamol. The protective effect of 200 micrograms of salbutamol was no longer significant at 4 hours, whereas both doses of salmeterol protected against methacholine challenge up to 12 hours after inhalation (p less than 0.01). An increased incidence of tremor (2/12) and palpitations (2/12) was recorded after inhalation of 100 micrograms of salmeterol. We conclude that inhalation of 50 or 100 micrograms of salmeterol causes a long-lasting bronchodilatation and protects against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction for at least 12 hours.