Anti-Xa and anti-IIa drugs alter international normalized ratio measurements: potential problems in the monitoring of oral anticoagulants.

Several of the newly developed anti-Xa and anti-IIa agents have been shown to influence the International Normalized Ratio (INR) values. During phase I trials with normal healthy volunteers and phase II study patients who were given warfarin and concomitant anti-IIa or anti-Xa agents, it has been reported that INR values were falsely elevated. It is of critical importance to know of the effects of these agents on INR to avoid dosage errors. To study the influence of these agents on INR, we used several anti-IIa agents (argatroban, recombinant hirudin, efegatran, and PEG-hirudin) and anti-Xa drugs (pentasaccharides such as fondaparinux and idraparinux, DX-9065a and JTV-803). The anti-IIa drugs were supplemented in citrated plasma at a concentration of 0 to 1 microg/mL level and anti-Xa drugs in the range of 0 to 25 microg/mL. The IC(50) values for each of these agents were calculated. Four different commercially available prothrombin time (PT) reagents were used to perform the PT assays and to calculate the relative INR values. Direct synthetic factor IIa and Xa inhibitors exhibited a concentration-dependent increase in the INR values. Hirudin, efegatran, and PEG-hirudin showed a weaker effect, whereas argatroban showed a much higher elevation of the INR values. Synthetic indirect anti-Xa agents such as the pentasaccharide did not show any effect on the INR values. Furthermore, prothrombin time reagents with high ISI values exhibited disproportionally higher INR values for both the direct anti-Xa and anti-IIa agents. Elevation of INR values has therapeutic implications when non-oral anticoagulant drugs are used in combination with drugs such as warfarin. Because of the false elevation of INR values with some of the non-oral anticoagulant drugs, patients who are on concomitant warfarin therapy should be carefully evaluated for their corresponding INR values for proper dosing. To avoid dosing errors it is best not to use the INR values in the therapeutic monitoring of anti-Xa and anti-IIa agents either in the monotherapeutic or polytherapeutic modalities. These data also warrant the development clinically relevant methods for the monitoring of the concomitant use of newly developed anti-Xa and anti-IIa drugs with oral anticoagulants.     

Balancing Efficacy and Bleeding Risk in the Prevention of Stroke Due to Atrial Fibrillation with Newer Oral Anticoagulants

With the evaluation and approval of newer oral anticoagulants such as the factor IIa inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate and the factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban, strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation need a thorough re-evaluation of current options. Clinicians are naturally excited about the imminent introduction of these newer drugs that do not need international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring, besides having no drug–food and minimal drug–drug interactions. However, as with all new drugs, it is always prudent to use these judiciously so that they stay in our therapeutic armamentarium for a long time. More than 56 years after the introduction of warfarin we now have three drugs, viz., dabigatran 150 mg bid, rivaroxaban 20 mg od, and apixaban 5 mg bid which were effective in comparison with warfarin in reducing the risk of stroke and bleeding in the landmark trials, RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, and ARISTOTLE respectively. There is a thin dividing line between physiological hemostasis and pathological thrombosis. Routine INR monitoring may not be required but in special situations, such as prior to major surgery, overdose, non-compliance or stroke while on the anticoagulant, one may wish to know whether there are any laboratory measures of efficacy or means of reversal of over anticoagulation. Similar questions may be raised about other situations such as renal dysfunction, cardioversion, ablation procedures, post-stenting, or switch to and from warfarin, heparin or LMWH? This document is an attempt to address these concerns based on available evidence and give physicians a perspective and practice guidelines on how best to use these agents, both old and new, for optimal patient outcomes, maximizing efficacy and minimizing risk.     

Impact of telavancin on prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time as determined using point-of-care coagulometers

Telavancin is approved in the United States, Canada, and Europe (At the time of submission, the telavancin European marketing authorization for nosocomial pneumonia was suspended until Theravance provides evidence of a new European Medicines Agency approved supplier) as an antibiotic to treat certain Gram-positive bacterial skin infections. Telavancin has been shown to prolong plasmatic prothrombin (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin (aPTT) clotting times in clinical diagnostic lab-based assays. In this study, we evaluated the potential for telavancin to prolong whole blood PT/International Normalized Ratio (INR) and aPTT tests on point-of-care (POC) instruments. Whole blood collected from 8 healthy subjects was supplemented with telavancin to final concentrations of 0, 10, 20, and 100 μg/ml. Final concentrations were selected to match trough, twice trough, and peak plasma levels following the approved 10 mg/kg dose. Four widely employed POC coagulation instruments were chosen to be representative of the POC platforms currently in use.. These systems were the Roche Coaguchek XS, the Abbott iSTAT, the ITC Hemochron SIG+, and the Alere INRatio2 POC devices. The PT/INR measured by the Coaguchek XS showed the greatest sensitivity to the presence of telavancin. The PT/INR measured by the Hemochron SIG+ and iSTAT were sensitive to telavancin but to a lesser extent. The INRatio2 was the least sensitive to the presence of telavancin when testing the whole blood PT/INR. Only the Hemochron SIG+ device was capable of measuring aPTT and showed a concentration-dependent increase in aPTT. This study supports the current recommendation that PT and aPTT monitoring be conducted immediately to the next dose of telavancin when coagulation parameters are tested using POC instrumentation.     

Activated partial thromboplastin time after heparin removal (aPTT/HR) in a new scheme of anticoagulant monitoring

Activated partial thromboplastin time after heparin removal (aPTT/HR), a test employing anion exchange chromatography, was devised as an alternative to the prothrombin time after heparin removal (PT/HR) to monitor simultaneous anticoagulation with heparin and coumarins. The potential utility of the aPTT/HR was assessed by performing parallel PTs and aPTTs on 62 consecutive plasmas from coumarin-treated outpatients. All samples had 0.2 units/ml of heparin added and then removed to see if the maneuver influenced therapeutic group assignment. In no instance did reassignment occur. A conditional Irwin-Fisher test (P = 0.000604) and a special multinomial trial analysis (P = 0.002) indicated that the aPTT would be at least comparable to the PT for following coumarin antithrombotic prophylaxis. Since the heparin removal procedure had no influence on therapeutic categorization, the same statistical proof could be applied to the relationship between aPTT/HR and PT/HR. This study indicates that the aPTT can be used to monitor all stages of heparin and/or coumarin anticoagulation.     

Disagreement between bedside and laboratory activated partial thromboplastin time and international normalized ratio for various novel anticoagulants.

During studies on warfarin, heparin and various anticoagulants with novel mechanisms of action, the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and the (apparent) international normalized ratio (INR) from a bedside monitor (Coagucheck Plus(R)) were compared with laboratory assay results. Data were compared using the Bland and Altman method of comparison where systematic differences result in significant slopes of the regression line. During heparin treatment, the bedside monitor largely underestimated the aPTT (slope = -0.80). During treatment with the direct thrombin inhibitor napsagatran (slope = 0.99), the pentasaccharides Org31540/SR90107A (slope = 0.77) and SanOrg34006 (slope = 0.35), and warfarin (slope = 0.60), the bedside monitor underestimated the aPTT at lower aPTT levels, while at higher aPTT levels it overestimated the laboratory values. The bedside monitor slightly overestimated the INR during treatment with warfarin (slope = 0.33). Apparent INR was largely overestimated during treatment with Org31540/SR90107A (slope = 1.38), SanOrg34006 (slope = 0.97), Napsagatran (slope = 1.23), and recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor (slope = 1.48, P < 0.001 for all regression lines). These results indicate that a substantial disagreement in aPTT or (apparent) INR exists between the bedside monitor and laboratory assay during treatment with the studied 'classic' and novel anticoagulants. The amount of disagreement depended on the anticoagulant given.     

Antithrombotic drugs for older subjects. Guidelines formulated jointly by the Italian Societies of Haemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET) and of Gerontology and Geriatrics (SIGG)

Older individuals contribute heavily to the percentage of deaths due to myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is highest in subjects > 65 years. Prospective intervention trials involving groups of clinically comparable subjects > or = 60 allow the following statements to be made with regard to the use of antithrombotic drugs in the elderly. Antiplatelet agents. To prevent recurrence of ischaemic stroke and MI in stable/unstable angina, MI, TIA/stroke or peripheral arterial disease, aspirin is the drug of choice. Clopidogrel is more effective than aspirin in this respect. Heparin. For the treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), intravenous standard heparin or subcutaneous standard heparin are effective (aPTT 1.5-2.0 times baseline values). As the risk of bleeding increases with age, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) are preferable in the elderly. For the prophylaxis of VTE in general surgery in subjects at low-moderate risk, low-dose heparin or low doses of LMWH are effective. In subjects at high risk, adjusted-dose heparin plus physical devices or high-dose LMWH are recommended. The combination of heparin and aspirin is the standard treatment for unstable angina and non-Q wave MI. LMWH are as active as standard heparin in this indication. Vitamin K antagonists. For the chronic treatment of VTE, warfarin is also the treatment of choice (INR 2.0-3.0) in the elderly, though lower doses are needed due to their hypersensitivity to oral anticoagulants. For the prevention of thromboembolic stroke in patients > 75 with atrial fibrillation, warfarin is the drug of choice. Patients aged 65-75 may receive warfarin or aspirin. Thrombolytic agents. Thrombolytic agents are not recommended for treating DVT in the elderly because of their limited risk/benefit ratio and should be confined to massive PE. In the absence of contraindications, thrombolysis for MI may be considered in the elderly.     

Intravenous Fat Emulsion Does Not Significantly Alter Clotting Markers in Dabigatran-Treated Blood

Dabigatran etexilate is an oral direct thrombin (Factor IIa) inhibitor approved for patients with atrial fibrillation and for management of risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Dabigatran offers advantages over treatment with warfarin, including limited laboratory monitoring. It is equivalent in prevention of stroke and deep vein thrombosis with essentially equivalent complication rates. In contrast to warfarin, reversal of the anticoagulation is less well established. Idarucizumab is available for reversal, however supporting research is mixed; the agent also happens to be quite expensive making availability difficult. Hemodialysis has been proposed as a method of reversal, but this is difficult in patients with life threatening hemorrhage, and is not available at many hospitals. Intravenous fat emulsion (IFE) has been used for treatment of overdose of lipophilic drugs. Most toxicologists only recommend IFE for patients in extremis after ingestion of a lipid soluble substance. Dabigatran is lipid soluble, although the pro-drug more so than the active metabolite. The authors sought to see if dabigatran-induced coagulopathy of human in vitro blood samples could be reversed with IFE. Blood samples were spiked with dabigatran or dabigatran plus IFE. Values for Ecarin clot time (ECT—primary outcome), PT/INR, and aPTT, were compared across both study arms. A total of 18 healthy volunteers were included in our study. There were no significant differences in the ECT, PT/INR, and aPTT between the dabigatran arm and the dabigatran plus IFE arm. Based on these methods, IFE does not reverse dabigatran-induced coagulopathy.     

Advances in adjunctive pharmacological therapy for percutaneous coronary interventions

All percutaneous interventions disrupt atherosclerotic plaque and denude the endothelium. These processes stimulate both platelet aggregation and the coagulation cascade. Therefore, pharmacological treatment during percutaneous intervention is based on the use of antithrombotic agents. In addition to aspirin, whose benefit has been clearly demonstrated in all forms of ischemic heart disease, clopidogrel, given before and after cardiac catheterization, also reduces the rate of thrombosis after stent placement. Moreover, the introduction of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors has improved the results of percutaneous revascularization, especially in high-risk patients. On the other hand, anticoagulants are essential for preventing the acute thrombotic complications that result from the invasive nature of the procedure. Low-molecular-weight heparins, direct thrombin inhibitors (e.g., hirudin and its derivatives), and recently developed pentasaccharides, which inhibit factor X, provide new alternatives to classical unfractionated heparin. These novel compounds lead to fewer hemorrhagic complications than unfractionated heparin and do not require such extensive monitoring. Finally, new antiproliferative agents, such as oral rapamycin, have been introduced to reduce the rate of coronary restenosis during follow-up.     

Drotrecogin alfa activated (recombinant human activated protein C) in combination with heparin or melagatran: effects on prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time.

Recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC) has recently been demonstrated to be a promising candidate to improve the outcome for patients with severe sepsis. Plasma-derived activated protein C and unfractionated heparin (UH) exert anticoagulant synergy due to mechanisms that simultaneously decrease thrombin generation. Melagatran, a new direct thrombin inhibitor, does not bind to plasma proteins or requires antithrombin as a cofactor. The latter is often consumed in patients with severe sepsis. We investigated the anticoagulant efficiency in combined administration of rhAPC and UH or melagatran in terms of prolongation of the standard clotting assays activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT) in pooled plasma samples in vitro. RhAPC dose-dependently prolonged the aPTT but not the PT. The ability of UH and melagatran to prolong the aPTT was significantly enhanced in combination with rhAPC. The combined administration of rhAPC and melagatran, but not UH, resulted in additive prolongation of the PT. In control measurements the capability of rhAPC to suppress prothrombin fragment 1.2 generation dose-dependently increased in combination with heparin and melagatran. Our study demonstrates the respective effects of rhAPC, UH, melagatran and further different additive effects in combined administration of rhAPC and UH or melagatran on the prolongation of the aPTT and PT clotting assays usually used to monitor anticoagulant treatment.     

凝血酶原前体蛋白在抗凝监测中的临床研究

目的探讨凝血酶原前体蛋白（PIVKA-Ⅱ）在华法林抗凝治疗监测中的意义。方法动态监测60例心脏机械瓣膜置换术后行抗凝治疗病人（实验组）的血浆PIVKA-Ⅱ浓度、凝血酶原时间（prothrombin time,PT）、国际标准化比率（international normalized ratio,INR）,比较3者出现明显异常的最早时间,分析PIVKA-Ⅱ与胛及INR之间的相关性。结果实验组首次服华法林后6h,血浆PIVKA-Ⅱ浓度即出现明显异常,并随时间增加而增高;实验组首次服华法林后60h,PT出现明显异常,并随时间增加而增高;实验组首次服华法林后24h,INR出现明显异常,并随时间增加而增高;线性相关分析,结果显示PIVKA-Ⅱ浓度与PT呈正相关（r=0．786,P〈0．01）;PIVKA-Ⅱ浓度与INR呈正相关（r=0．737,P〈0．01）。结论在抗凝治疗的患者中,通过监测患者的血浆PIVKA-Ⅱ浓度可以有效地监测其抗凝程度,联合监测患者的血浆PIVKA-Ⅱ浓度、PT、INR则更能早期、有效的监测患者抗凝程度。     

Use of a centrifugal analyzer for a chromogenic prothrombin time, a chromogenic activated partial thromboplastin time and a kinetic fibrinogen assay in a routine hospital laboratory

A Cobas Bio centrifugal analyzer was used in a clinical laboratory for the performance of chromogenic clotting assays. Three commercially available photometric clotting tests--prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and fibrinogen--were compared with the traditional clotting assays during 3 months. No great discrepancies were found between the traditional assays and the new photometric assays. The chromogenic PT could replace the traditional thrombotest, PT and Normotest, because it was sensitive and accurate over a broad range of clotting factor activity. Furthermore the chromogenic PT could be used to discriminate between a decreased clotting activity due to vitamin K deficiency or to a decreased protein synthesis by the liver. A decreased protein synthesis was confirmed by measuring a decrease in the serum cholinesterase activity. The chromogenic aPTT could be used for the assay of heparin concentrations in the therapeutic range and turned out to be more sensitive for deficiencies of factor VIII and factor IX than a traditional clotting aPTT. We conclude that the accuracy and practicability of clotting assays are improved by the new assays without diminishing the clinical value of the results.     

Novel Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia that can potentially result in stroke. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) like warfarin were for many decades the only oral anticoagulants available for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) at high risk of stroke. Recently, new oral anticoagulants (NOACS) have been introduced that act via direct inhibition of thrombin (dabigatran) or activated factor X (edoxaban, rivaroxaban and apixaban). Unlike VKAs, these anticoagulants do not require routine INR monitoring and posses favorable pharmacological properties. NOACs act rapidly, and have a stable and predictable dose-related anticoagulant effect with few clinically relevant drug-drug interactions. Phase III trials comparing these agents to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF demonstrated that they are at least as efficacious and safe as warfarin. Evolution of clinical guidelines to incorporate the new anticoagulants for stroke prevention in non-valvular AF may result in a reduction in the incidence of AF-related strokes. Safe and effective use of these new drugs in clinical practice requires understanding of their distinct pharmacological properties.     

Antithrombotic Effects of BCH 2763, a New Direct Thrombin Inhibitor,in a Canine Model of Venous Thrombosis

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a common cardiovascular disease, resulting in significant mortality each year in the United States. Direct thrombin inhibitors represent a new class of drugs that could potentially be better than conventional antithrombotic therapy based on indirect inhibition of coagulation factors with heparin and warfarin. BCH 2763 is a potent, selective bifunctional thrombin inhibitor that blocks both the active catalytic site and the anion binding exosite. The objective of this study is to test the antithrombotic efficacy of BCH 2763 in a canine model of DVT induced through electrolytic injury to the femoral vein. BCH 2763 was administered at three dose levels: 0.125 mg/kg bolus followed by 10 µg/kg/min IV infusion (low-dose; n = 5), 0.25 mg/kg bolus followed by 20 µg/kg/min infusion (mid-dose; n = 5), and 0.75 mg/kg bolus followed by 60 µg/kg/min (high-dose; n = 5). The control group (n = 5) received a 5-ml intravenous bolus of saline followed by a 1 mL/kg/h infusion. The parameters evaluated were changes in activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), thrombin time (TT), prothrombin time (PT), time to formation of an occlusive thrombus in the femoral vein, and the amount of venous blood flow delivered over the course of the experiment. There were significant dose-dependent increases in aPTT, TT, and PT in the BCH 2763-treated animals compared with the control group. The time to formation of an occlusive thrombus in the control group averaged 69.6 ± 9 minutes. Treatment with BCH 2763 prolonged the time to occlusion to 126.4 ± 13 minutes in the low-dose group, 155.4 ± 17 minutes in the mid-dose group, and 229 ± 7 minutes in the high-dose group (80% remained patent for the duration of the study), which were all significantly greater than the controls. Femoral venous blood flow was significantly greater in the mid-dose (51 ± 8%) and the high-dose (70 ± 6%) groups compared with the control vessels (22 ± 3%). In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that BCH 2763 is an effective intravenous antithrombotic agent in the canine electrolytic injury model of venous thrombosis.     

Frequency of monitoring, non-adherence, and other topics dear to an anticoagulation clinic provider

Historically, there has been limited data informing practical matters encountered in day-to-day warfarin management. Several studies have recently explored topics that address several of these gaps in the literature. Extending INR recheck intervals to 12 weeks is feasible with comparable time-in-therapeutic range compared to traditional 4 week intervals. Patients more likely to maintain stable anticoagulation are older, have an INR target of 2–3 (versus higher targets), and do not have heart failure. Unsurprisingly, non-adherence with reliably taking warfarin is associated with poor anticoagulation control. In addition, non-adherence with INR monitoring is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism. Evidence-based interventions to improve adherence are lacking. When managing a modestly out of range INR value in previously stable warfarin patients, providers have a few options: 1) change the maintenance warfarin dose, 2) give a one-time dose adjustment, followed by resumption of the previous warfarin dose, or 3) continue the same warfarin dose with no adjustment. Each of these options can be successful, particularly when paired with increased INR monitoring. Bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin for a single subtherapeutic INR is not warranted for most patients. The 9th edition of the American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis chapter “Evidence-Based Management of Anticoagulant Therapy” reviews these and many new and practical recommendations for anticoagulation clinic providers.     

Relative neutralization of the biological actions of sulfaminoheparosans (K5 derivatives) and heparins by protamine sulfate.

Biosynthetic, semisynthetic, and synthetic analogues of heparins are currently developed as substitute antithrombotic agents for heparin. Sulfaminoheparosan (SAH) represents a bacterial polysaccharide (K5)-derived antithrombotic polymer from which pharmacologically active products with varying molecular weights (5-25 kDa) can be derived. These agents have been shown to exhibit pharmacologic effects comparable to heparins. The objective of this investigation is to determine the relative neutralization profile of various SAH derivatives, also called as bioheparins, by protamine sulfate. Four SAH fractions with varying molecular weights (20, 9, 7, and 6 kDa), a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), tinzaparin, and unfractionated heparin (UFH) were supplemented to normal human pool plasma over a concentration range of 6.2 to 100 microg/mL. A fixed amount of protamine sulfate at 25 microg/mL (final concentration) was supplemented to determine the neutralization profile by performing tests such as prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), Heptest, prothrombin-induced clotting time (PiCT), and amidolytic anti-Xa and anti-IIa assays. Protamine sulfate produced varying degrees of neutralization of all bioheparin fractions in the clotting assays. In the amidolytic anti-IIa assay relatively stronger inhibition was noted for all agents than inhibition of FXa. On a cumulative basis the neutralization profile of SAHs was comparable with heparins. These results suggest that the anticoagulant activities of SAH derivatives can be antagonized by protamine sulfate. These studies warrant further in vivo investigation to validate the relative neutralization profile of sulfaminoheparosans.     

Understanding the hemostatic effects of recombinant factor VIIa by clot wave form analysis

The monitoring of coagulation-inhibitor bypassing agents, including recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), remains a major issue in the management of clinical hemophilia. Clotting assays using prothrombin time (PT) and measurements of factor VII (FVII) activity do not always reflect the hemostatic effects of treatment. Thrombelastography can be used to observe the global effects of treatment on the overall coagulation process and is especially useful for observing the effects of hemostatic treatment in hemophilia patients with inhibitors. Waveform analysis is another technique for evaluating global hemostatic condition where changes in light transmission during routine clotting assays, such as the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), are measured. We found that waveforms differed between individual patients with severe hemophilia A (FVIII:C < 1.0 IU/dL) with levels of sensitivity at below FVIII:C 1.0 IU/dL. Clot waveforms indicated dose-dependent improvements in clot formation after the addition of rFVIIa to both FVIII-deficient and factor IX (FIX)-deficient plasma. The improvements were further enhanced in the presence of both platelets and synthetic phospholipids, and were more pronounced with FVIII-deficient plasma than with FIX-deficient plasma. It appears that clot waveform analysis provides a very useful means for monitoring hemostasis in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors.     

Warfarin therapy for an octogenarian who has atrial fibrillation

In North America, atrial fibrillation is associated with at least 75 000 ischemic strokes each year. Most of these strokes occur in patients older than 75 years of age. The high incidence of stroke in very elderly persons reflects the increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation that occurs with advanced age, the high incidence of stroke in elderly patients, and the failure of physicians to prescribe antithrombotic therapy in most of these patients. This failure is related to the increased risk for major hemorrhage with advanced age, obfuscating the decision to institute stroke prophylaxis with antithrombotic therapy.This case-based review describes the risk and benefits of prescribing antithrombotic therapy for a hypothetical 80-year-old man who has atrial fibrillation and hypertension, and it offers practical advice on managing warfarin therapy. After concluding that the benefits of warfarin outweigh its risks in this patient, we describe how to initiate warfarin therapy cautiously and how to monitor and dose the drug. We then review five recent randomized, controlled trials that document the increased risk for stroke when an international normalized ratio (INR) of less than 2.0 is targeted among patients with atrial fibrillation. Next, we make the case that cardioversion is not needed for this asymptomatic patient with chronic atrial fibrillation. Instead, we choose to leave the patient in atrial fibrillation and to control his ventricular rate with atenolol. Later, when the INR increases to 4.9, we advocate withholding one dose of warfarin and repeating the INR test. Finally, when the patient develops dental pain, we review the analgesic agents that are safe to take with warfarin and explain why warfarin therapy does not have to be interrupted during a subsequent dental extraction.     

Methods for the monitoring of direct thrombin inhibitors

Direct thrombin inhibitors are available for prophylactic as well as therapeutic purposes. Application of hirudin in therapeutic doses has been shown to require drug monitoring. Currently, most experience is available for recombinant hirudin, but the principle aspects of drug monitoring are the same for all direct thrombin inhibitors. Most frequently, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and modifications of the activated clotting time (ACT) have been used for the monitoring of hirudin therapy. However, these methods are insensitive at plasma levels higher than 0.6 mg/L of hirudin, so that overdoses may be missed despite monitoring. Correlations between ecarin clotting time (ECT), enzyme immunoassays, and chromogenic substrate assays on one side and global tests on the other side are poor. Fully automated chromogenic substrate-based assays, also available as point-of-care tests (POCT), are more precise and sensitive and are not disturbed by interferents such as heparin and antithrombin. Good correlations can be observed between chromogenic assays and the ECT performed in plasma or whole blood samples. ECT can also be determined with POCT systems. Test characteristics such as imprecision and measuring range are comparable to those of the chromogenic assays. In conclusion, therapy with direct thrombin inhibitors should be monitored with chromogenic assays or ECT.     

Laboratory measurement of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: selecting the optimal assay based on drug,assay availability,and clinical indication

Although the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) do not require routine monitoring, there are special circumstances in which laboratory measurement may be warranted. The objectives of this review are to summarize evidence on the influence of the NOACs on coagulation tests and provide practical guidance to clinicians on measurement and interpretation of coagulation assays in NOAC-treated patients. Selection of an appropriate assay for NOAC measurement depends on the drug, clinical objective, and assay availability. Separate suggestions for assay selection are provided depending on whether specialized assays are available or whether choice is limited to conventional coagulation assays such as the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). The dilute thrombin time (TT) and ecarin-based assays are able to quantify dabigatran across a broad range of concentrations, but are not widely available. A normal TT excludes clinically relevant levels. A normal APTT probably excludes excess levels of dabigatran, but does not rule out typical on-therapy drug concentrations. The PT is insufficiently sensitive to dabigatran to be useful in most situations. Factor Xa inhibitors may be quantified with an anti-Xa assay calibrated with drug-specific standards. A normal PT probably excludes excess levels of rivaroxaban and edoxaban, but not typical on-therapy levels of these agents. The PT is less sensitive to apixaban. Depending on the sensitivity of the thromboplastin reagent, a normal PT may not exclude excess levels of apixaban. The APTT has inadequate sensitivity to factor Xa inhibitors and is not recommended for their measurement.     

New antithrombotic agents

The development of new antithrombotic agents has been stimulated by clinical needs and by advances in biotechnology that have made it possible to produce drugs that target specific steps in thrombogenesis. Heparin has pharmacokinetic and biophysical limitations that are overcome by new anticoagulants. Of these, low-molecular-weight heparin and direct inhibitors of thrombin have been evaluated clinically. Coumarins require careful laboratory monitoring because of concerns about safety. Orally active direct inhibitors of thrombin and factor Xa may replace coumarins. Aspirin is of limited efficacy because it inhibits only one pathway of platelet activation. Inhibitors of adenosine diphosphate receptor and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists are more effective than aspirin and are used in the clinic.