经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞在晚期肝癌治疗中的价值

目的 评价经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞在晚期肝癌治疗中的价值。方法 文中对１２例肝癌经股动脉行肝动脉化疗栓塞。结果 半年生存率３３％,达到了改善病人生活质量、延长生存时间的目的。结论 对于晚期肝癌病人,只要一般情况尚可,应积极治疗,但治疗方案要个体化,这样才能在取得较好疗效的同时又不致产生过多的负效应。     

双途径介入化疗与单纯肝动脉栓塞化疗治疗晚期肝癌的临床观察

目的研究肝动脉化疗栓塞基础上经皮经肝门静脉灌注化疗治疗晚期肝癌的疗效.方法对49例不能手术切除的晚期原发性肝癌随机分组,行单纯肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗与在肝动脉化疗栓塞基础上加用经肝门静脉灌注化疗,对比分析.结果肝动脉化疗栓塞基础上经肝门静脉灌注化疗治疗晚期肝癌患者的半年、一年、二年、三年生存率分别为100%、76.5%、35.29%、23.53%,AFP及全身转移的发生率明显降低,与对照组有显著差异.结论肝动脉化疗栓塞基础上经肝门静脉灌注化疗治疗晚期肝癌疗效优于单纯性经肝动脉化疗栓塞.     

原发性肝癌肝动脉化疗栓塞合并LAK/IL-2灌注治疗的临床Ⅲ期观察

评价肝动脉化疗栓塞合并ＬＡＫ／ＩＬ┐２灌注治疗原发性肝癌的初步疗效。方法不能切除的肝癌患者经肝动脉化疗栓塞后灌注自体ＬＡＫ细胞及ＩＬ┐２，并与单独行肝动脉化疗栓塞的不能切除肝癌患者比较其肿瘤大小，生活质量的变化及毒副反应。结果经肝动脉化疗栓塞合并ＬＡＫ／ＩＬ┐２灌注治疗的２２例肝癌有效率（ＣＲ＋ＰＲ）为１３．６％，包括１例完全缓解和２例部分缓解，而单独化疗栓塞对照组１７例中仅１例显示部分缓解（有效率５．９％）。化疗栓塞＋ＬＡＫ／ＩＬ┐２治疗组与单独化疗栓塞对照组中ＭＲ、ＳＤ、ＰＤ分别为５、１２、１例和１、１１、４例。治疗组中大多数病人生活质量改善或稳定，而对照组中生活质量则无提高。两组病人的毒副反应均较轻而短暂。结论经肝动脉化疗栓塞合并ＬＡＫ／ＩＬ┐２灌注治疗原发性肝癌疗效较优于单独肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗，原发性肝癌更有效的综合治疗方案有待进一步探索     

肝动脉栓塞化疗加电化学治疗肝癌近期疗效观察

目的 :比较无手术指征肝癌患者单纯肝动脉栓塞化疗与在肝动脉栓塞化疗基础上行电化学治疗的近期疗效。方法 :选择无手术指征的肝癌患者 59例 ,随机分为单纯肝动脉栓塞化疗组 (化疗组 )和肝动脉栓塞化疗加电化学治疗组 (化疗 电疗组 ) ,比较两种治疗方法的近期疗效。结果 :在肝动脉栓塞化疗基础上行电化学治疗在肿瘤缩小、肝区疼痛消失方面优于单纯肝动脉栓塞化疗。结论 :无手术指征肝癌患者在肝动脉栓塞化疗的基础上行电化学治疗近期疗效显著。     

肝动脉栓塞化疗加电化学治疗肝癌近期疗效观察

目的：比较无手术指征肝癌患者单纯肝动脉栓塞化疗与在肝动脉栓塞化疗基础上行电化学治疗的近期疗效。方法：选择无手术指征的肝癌患者59例,随机分为单纯肝动脉栓塞化疗组（化疗组）和肝动脉栓塞化疗加电化学治疗组（化疗＋电疗组）,比较两种治疗方法的近期疗效。结果：在肝动脉栓塞化疗基础上行电化学治疗在肿瘤缩小、肝区疼痛消失方面优于单纯肝动脉栓塞化疗。结论：无手术指征肝癌患者在肝动脉栓塞化疗的基础上行电化学治疗近期疗效显著。     

经皮微波固化联合肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗碘油存留较少的原发性肝癌

目的观察经皮微波固化治疗联合肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗碘油存留较少的原发性肝癌的疗效。方法60例曾经进行肝动脉化疗栓塞且碘油存留较少肝癌的患者随机分为两组。联合治疗组30例患者在进行肝动脉化疗栓塞后给予经皮穿刺微波固化治疗,对照组30例患者仅行肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗。结果联合治疗组和对照组的近期有效率分别为70%和53.3%,联合治疗组没有增加严重并发症。结论经皮微波固化联合肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗可提高碘油存留较少的原发性肝癌的近期疗效。     

切除术前、后辅助性肝动脉栓塞化疗对巨块型肝癌预后的影响

目的：研究术前和术后辅助性肝动脉栓塞化疗对肿瘤直径为8cm以上的巨块型肝癌病人切除术后的影响。方法：采用病例对照研究的方法,将 本所1995－1998年的病例资料,用Kaplan-Meier方法研究单纯切除术病人,术后辅助性肝动脉栓塞化疗,术前辅助性肝动脉栓塞化疗病人生存曲线。Log-rank方法比较各生存曲线的差别。结果：单纯切除组病人、术后辅助性肝动脉栓塞化疗、和术前辅助性肝动脉栓塞化疗病人的中位生存期分别为17．0月,33．0月,和49．0月（P＝0．011）。结论：提示术前辅助性肝动脉栓塞化疗效果优于术后辅助性肝动脉栓塞化疗的结果。对于肿瘤直径在8cm的肝癌,应该在术前或术后给予辅助性肝动脉栓塞化疗。     

肝动脉栓塞及肝动脉-门静脉双重栓塞化疗治疗中晚期原发性肝癌的疗效比较

背景与目的:临床资料表明,肝的血液由肝动脉和门静脉双重供应,肝癌患者单纯应用肝动脉栓塞化疗(transcatheterarterialchemoembolization,TACE)难以控制肿瘤。本研究旨在探讨经肝动脉行动-门脉双重栓塞化疗(portalvenouschemoembolization,PVCE)治疗中、晚期原发性肝癌的临床价值。方法:回顾性分析1995年7月～1997年7月经肝动脉行动-门脉双重栓塞化疗对58例中、晚期原发性肝癌(TACE+PVCE组)的疗效,与同期行单纯肝动脉栓塞化疗的118例中、晚期原发性肝癌(TACE组)的疗效对比。结果:(1)TACE+PVCE组治疗有效率86.2%,显效率31.0%;TACE组治疗有效率69.5%,显效率13.6%(P<0.05)。(2)TACE+PVCE组半年生存率93.1%,TACE组72.0%;TACE+PVCE组1、4年的生存率分别为43.1%、6.9%;TACE组分别为51.7%、5.1%。寿命表法分析两组患者半年生存率间差异有显著性,1、2、3、4年生存率间差异无显著性。(3)两组患者栓塞后均有发热、腹痛、白细胞下降、肝功能受损发生,TACE+PVCE组肝功能受损较严.-重,甚至可出现黄疸、腹水,肝功能受损程度与碘油用量呈正相关。结论:经肝动脉行动-门脉双重栓塞化疗治疗中、晚期原发性肝癌的短期疗效明显优于单纯行肝动脉栓塞化疗,但中、长期疗效差异无显著性。     

经皮射频毁损和肝动脉栓塞化疗联合治疗中晚期原发性肝癌的疗效观察

肝动脉栓塞化疗(transcatheter arterial chemoembolization,TACE)已广泛用于治疗中、晚期原发性肝癌,并已取得了一定的疗效.但肝癌由肝动脉和门静脉双重供血,单纯肝动脉栓塞化疗不能有效控制肿瘤生长.射频毁损(Radiofrequency Ablation,RFA)治疗肝脏恶性肿瘤,有明确疗效[1].本文回顾性分析我院103例中、晚期原发性肝癌患者行TACE和(或)RFA治疗资料,探讨TACE与RFA联合治疗中、晚期原发性肝癌的疗效.     

中晚期原发性肝癌超选择肝动脉插管化疗和栓塞的临床研究

 目的 研究中晚期原发性肝癌经肝动脉超选择性插管化疗与栓塞的疗效。方法 对1997年以来的中晚期原发性肝癌患者369例，经肝动脉超选择性插管化疗与栓塞治疗后，评价和随访疗效。结果 患者的临床症状明显缓解，肿块缩小，AFP值下降；患者治疗后1~5年生存率明显提高，生活质量得到改善。结论 经肝动脉超选择性插管化疗与栓塞是中晚期原发性肝癌的有效治疗手段。     

Prognostic factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by transcatheter arterial embolization

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter arterial embolization induces marked antitumor response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, but the survival benefit of transcatheter arterial embolization remains to be determined. This study investigated prognostic factors in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated by transcatheter arterial embolization. METHODS: A total of 128 consecutive patients with non-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma, who had undergone transcatheter arterial embolization between May 1990 and August 1998, were analyzed to investigate prognostic factors. RESULTS: Median survival time and survival proportions at 1, 3 and 5 years were 3.3 years, 92.0, 54.6 and 23.4%, respectively. By multivariate analysis using the accelerated failure time model, age <60 years, hepatitis C virus antibody positivity, serum albumin >3.5 g/dl, absence of portal vein invasion and serum alpha-fetoprotein level <400 ng/ml were significantly associated with favorable survival. For clinical application, we also propose a prognostic equation with combination of specific prognostic factors, by which survival curves of each patient could be predicted directly. CONCLUSION: The findings of the current study may be helpful in predicting the life expectancy of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated by transcatheter arterial embolization and in designing future clinical trials of transcatheter arterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.     

Liver fibrosis and five year survival of hepatocellular cancer cases undergoing transcatheter arterial chemo embolization using small doses

Objective: To investigate liver fibrosis, TGF-β1 levels and curative effects on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)with small and conventional dose perfusion chemotherapy by transcatheter arterial chemo embolization (TACE).Methods: Thirty-six hepatocellular carcinoma patients not indicated for surgical resection underwent superselectivetranscatheter arterial chemoembolization, divided into small dose (n=15) and conventional dose (n=21)chemotherapy groups. Results: With conventional doses, four indices of liver fibrosis focusing on hyaluronateacide (HA), human procollagen type-Ⅲ (hPC-Ⅲ), collagen type-Ⅳ (Ⅳ-C) and transforming growth factor-βl(TGF-β1) were obviously increased postoperative compared with preoperative (P<0.01); in contrast, with smalldoses there were no significant differences except for TGF-β1. Five year survival demonstrated no significantdifferences between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: To hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated byTACE, reducing doses of chemotherapy drugs can reduce progress of liver fibrosis, without impacting on fiveyear survival.     

Hepatic and splenic arterial infusion chemotherapy after transcatheter peripancreatic arterial embolization for patients with inoperable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas]

Thirty-one patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma and liver metastases were treated by hepatic and splenic arterial infusion chemotherapy after transcatheter peripancreatic arterial embolization. The response rate for these 31 patients was 61.3%, with a mean survival period of 17.8 +/- 3.2 months and a 50% survival period of 12 months. By site of the primary tumor, the response rate for pancreatic head and body carcinoma was 81%, with a mean survival period of 21.6 +/- 4.0 months and a 50% survival period of 17 months, whereas the response rate for pancreatic caudal carcinoma was 20%, with a mean survival period of 6.1 +/- 0.5 months and a 50% survival period of 6 months. We believe that the current chemotherapy is an effective treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer with liver metastases.     

白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨动脉灌注治疗进展期胰腺癌的安全性和有效性回顾性研究

背景与目的：白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨（nab-paclitaxel combined with gemcitabine,AG）方案静脉化疗是进展期胰腺癌有效治疗方案之一,动脉灌注化疗（transcatheter arterial chemotherapy,TAC）具有增强疗效并降低不良反应的优势,观察AG方案经TAC治疗进展期胰腺癌患者的有效性和安全性。方法：回顾性分析2016年1月—2019年6月复旦大学附属肿瘤医院收治的63例接受治疗的进展期胰腺癌患者,患者均经病理学检查确诊为胰腺导管腺癌,其中Ⅲ期15例,Ⅳ期48例,所有患者接受经动脉灌注化疗和（或）栓塞治疗,动脉灌注化疗用药方案为盐酸吉西他滨1 000 mg/m ² 联合白蛋白结合型紫杉醇125 mg/m ² ,灌注时间≥10 min,伴有肝转移者同时行供血动脉栓塞。结果：63例患者中,术中行数字减影血管造影（digital subtraction angiography,DSA）可见胰腺肿瘤和肝转移灶动脉供血比例分别为66.67%和35.29%;接受治疗1次4例,2次6例,3次6例,4次及以上47例,治疗次数最多为9次,间隔时间为21～45 d。1年生存率为36.51%,中位生存期（median overall survival,mOS）为9.2个月,6个月无进展生存（progression-free survival,PFS）率为44.44%,中位PFS（median PFS,mPFS）为4.7个月。多因素分析显示KPS≥80、Ⅲ期与较长的生存期相关,接受多次动脉灌注化疗和（或）栓塞是良好的生存预后相关因素。发生治疗相关的Ⅲ度及以上血液学不良反应包括中性粒细胞减少（3.17%）和血小板下降（4.76%）,非血液学不良反应包括乏力（6.35%）、恶心呕吐（9.52%）、腹泻（4.76%）和转氨酶升高（4.76%）;17.46%和22.22%的患者出现发热及肝区疼痛栓塞综合征,所有不良反应经治疗后均好转,无治疗相关性死亡病例。结论：白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨经动脉灌注治疗进展期胰腺癌具有较好的安全性,不良反应与静脉给药相比有所减少,可有效地控制病情,使患者生存获益。     

Advanced pancreatic carcinoma showing a complete response to arterial infusion chemotherapy

We report a patient with advanced carcinoma of the pancreatic body and tail with multiple liver metastases who showed a complete response to hepatic and splenic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HSAIC) with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil, following transcatheter peripancreatic arterial embolization (TPPAE) and partial splenic embolization (PSE). Nonresectable advanced pancreatic carcinoma tends to have a low response to medical treatment, with the median survival time being 6 months or less for stage IV cases. We disclose herein that the median survival time of patients receiving HSAIC after TPPAE is more than three times longer than the survival time attained with conventional treatments. However, in patients with advanced carcinoma of the pancreatic tail, for which TTPAE is not applicable, survival times remain low. Thus, in the patient described here, we also performed embolization of the left gastric and short gastric arteries as well as PSE to increase the flow within the great pancreatic and caudal pancreatic arteries via the splenic artery, and gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil were administered via the splenic artery. As a result of these procedures, marked reduction in the advanced carcinoma of the pancreatic body and tail and of liver metastases was attained.     

拓僖联合栓塞治疗中晚期原发性肝癌57例疗效分析

目的观察拓僖(HCPT,羟基喜树碱冻干粉针)为主的灌注化疗联合碘油栓塞治疗原发性中晚期原发性肝癌(PHC)的疗效和毒副作用.方法采用HCPT加氟尿嘧啶(5-Fu)、吡柔比星(THP)肝动脉灌注联合碘油(LP)肝动脉栓塞的化疗栓塞治疗方案,治疗中晚期原发性肝癌患者57例.结果 57例患者共接受化疗栓塞112次.部分缓解(PR)17例,稳定(NC)26例,进展(PD)14例,生存率6个月为81.8%,1年为54.5%,2年为22.7%.除进展病例外,患者临床症状(食欲减退、乏力、肝区疼痛等)均有不同程度改善.不良反应主要表现为发热、肝区疼痛、肝功波动、消化道症状和轻度骨髓抑制.在严重肝硬化基础上并发肝癌的患者肝动脉化疗栓塞后恢复缓慢.结论以HCPT为主灌注化疗联合肝动脉栓塞方案治疗中晚期肝癌,有可能延长患者生存期,提高生存质量,副作用小,但对于合并肝硬化的患者需要同时加强保肝治疗.     

Treatment policy for colon cancer liver metastases

Hepatectomy provides the highest rates of cure among the methods for treating colon cancer liver metastases, but it cannot be performed in many cases. Hepatectomy is the treatment of choice for colon cancer liver metastases in our department, but we conduct transcatheter arterial embolization alone or in combination with MCT on patients in whom hepatectomy cannot be performed or those with residual tumor following hepatectomy. Transcatheter arterial embolization is conducted on patients shown to have tumor vessels, following a single intra-arterial shot of an anticancer drug. MCT is performed under general anesthetic percutaneously or by abdominal section in patients who have not responded well to transcatheter arterial embolization, in order to improve the effectiveness of treatment on the tumor overall. We consider the combination of transcatheter arterial embolization and MCT to be an effective treatment for patients with a colon cancer liver metastasis who present with tumor vessels.     

奈达铂联合氟尿嘧啶栓塞治疗中晚期肝癌的临床观察

目的 探讨奈达铂(NDP)联合氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)方案栓塞治疗中晚期肝癌的疗效及安全性.方法 202例中晚期肝癌患者采用NDP联合5-FU方案与超液化碘油乳剂化疗栓塞治疗,具体为:NDP 100mg/m2行肝动脉灌注,5-FU1000mg/m2和超液化碘油5～ 40ml混合成乳剂行肝动脉栓塞.参照WHO抗癌药物毒性分级...     

Transcatheter arterial chemotherapy with and without embolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the antitumor effect, adverse effects and survival between transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) and transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy (TAI) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: The study population consisted of 168 consecutive patients with advanced HCC treated with transcatheter arterial treatments using cisplatin suspended in lipiodol. Among these, 74 patients were treated with TAE, and the remaining 94 patients were treated with TAI. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in any baseline characteristics except hemoglobin, platelets, albumin, and glutamic pyruvic transaminase. Complete or partial tumor response was achieved in 54 patients (73%) in the TAE group and in 48 patients (51%) in the TAI group (p < 0.01). There were two treatment-related deaths caused by acute hepatic failure and acute renal failure in the TAE group. Nausea and deterioration of serum transaminase after TAE were significantly more severe than after TAI. Median survival time and survival rates at 5 years were 3.1 years and 25% in the TAE group, and 2.5 years and 18% in the TAI group (p = 0.37). CONCLUSION: TAE has a higher antitumor effect than TAI, but does not significantly improve the survival of patients with HCC.     

原发性肝癌切除术后行肝动脉化疗栓塞术与化疗灌注术的疗效观察

目的:探讨肝动脉化疗栓塞术与化疗灌注术在原发性肝癌切除术后患者中的应用效果。方法:选取我院2014年11月至2016年2月原发性肝癌切除术后患者60例,根据治疗方案分为灌注组（n=30）与栓塞组（n=30）。栓塞组采取肝动脉化疗栓塞术,灌注组采取肝动脉化疗灌注术。统计两组患者住院时间、无瘤生存期、治疗前后血清因子［癌胚抗原（CEA）、甲胎蛋白（AFP）］水平、肝功能指标［天冬氨酸氨基转移酶（AST）、丙氨酸氨基转移酶（ALT）、总胆红素（TBIL）］水平、生活质量（KPS）分值,随访12～24个月,统计两组患者复发率及生存率。结果:住院时间、无瘤生存期:栓塞组住院时间与灌注组间无显著差异（P>0.05）,栓塞组无瘤生存期长于灌注组（P<0.05）;血清因子:治疗后两组血清AFP及CEA水平较治疗前降低,且栓塞组低于灌注组（P<0.05）;肝功能:治疗后两组血清AST、ATL、TBIL水平较治疗前降低,且栓塞组低于灌注组（P<0.05）;复发率:治疗后12个月、18个月栓塞组疾病复发率（6.67%、10.00%）与灌注组（16.67%、26.67%）间无显著差异（P>0.05）,治疗后24个月栓塞组疾病复发率（16.67%）低于灌注组（40.00%）（P<0.05）;生存率:栓塞组治疗后12个月、18个月、24个月生存率（90.00%、86.67%、80.00%）高于灌注组（83.33%、70.00%、63.33%）,但无显著差异（P>0.05）;生活质量:治疗后两组KPS分值较治疗前增高,且栓塞组高于灌注组（P<0.05）。结论:肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝癌切除术后患者效果优于肝动脉化疗灌注术,可有效降低血清AFP及CEA水平,改善患者肝功能,延长无瘤生存期,且可降低术后复发率,对改善患者生活质量具有一定积极意义。