Stereotactic core biopsy of breast microcalcifications: comparison of film versus digital mammography, both using an add-on unit.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of an add-on stereotactic unit for core biopsy of indeterminate breast microcalcifications and to compare digital with conventional stereotactic guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 232 lesions with indeterminate microcalcifications in 218 women who underwent stereotactically guided breast biopsies. All biopsies were performed using a standard mammography machine with an add-on unit, 121 with conventional and 111 with digital stereotactic guidance. Successful sampling of the lesion was determined by the detection of microcalcifications on specimen radiography or at pathology. RESULTS: Using the add-on unit, 219 (94.4%) of the 232 targeted lesions were successfully sampled. The size, location, number of cores per lesion, and histology of the lesions were not different between the conventional and digital stereotactic biopsy groups (p > 0.1). Indeterminate microcalcifications were missed on biopsy in nine (7.4%) of 121 cases using conventional radiography and in only four (3.6%) of 111 cases using digital imaging. Digital stereotactic guidance allowed sampling of lesions with fewer calcifications per square centimeter (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sampling of indeterminate microcalcifications using a standard mammography machine and an add-on unit has a high accuracy, similar to rates reported for dedicated prone biopsy tables. An add-on unit offers the advantage of considerable cost and space savings. Relative to conventional radiography, digital stereotactic guidance allows lesions with fewer calcifications to be sampled and achieves a greater biopsy success rate. Immediate digital images in the biopsy room also permit rapid adjustment of alignment and minimize patient movement.     

Automated stereotactic core needle biopsy of microcalcifications with correlation to surgical biopsy.

PURPOSE: To compare pathologic findings from stereotactic core and excisional biopsies in patients with microcalcifications in the breast. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Stereotactic core needle biopsies of 101 lesions with mammographic evidence of microcalcifications were performed with long-throw (2.2 cm) automated core biopsy devices fitted with 2.1-mm needles. The core specimens were placed on microscope slides and radiographed. The pathologic features of core and excisional specimens were compared. RESULTS: In 100 of the 101 breast lesions, a correct choice for an additional diagnostic procedure or definitive treatment could have been made upon histopathologic findings of the core needle biopsy. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic core needle biopsy is a reliable alternative to surgical biopsy of breast lesions with microcalcifications provided that specimen radiography has been performed to ensure that appropriate tissue has been obtained. Excisional biopsy may be avoided if microcalcifications are visible in radiographs of core biopsy specimen with benign histology.     

When have mammographic calcifications been adequately sampled at needle core biopsy?

AIMS: To determine if the number of flecks of calcification retrieved at stereotaxic core needle biopsy or the number of core samples obtained containing calcification are related to biopsy sensitivity, and to determine how many calcifications or cores containing calcification the radiologist should aim to retrieve when sampling mammographic microcalcification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of core specimen radiographs from 57 consecutive patients who had stereotaxic core needle biopsies of impalpable malignant microcalcifications without an associated mammographic mass. The total number of calcifications retrieved and the numbers of cores containing calcification were correlated with findings at core and surgical histology. RESULTS: Increasing retrieval of calcification elements visible on specimen radiography was associated with increasing sensitivity of the biopsy. Five or more flecks of calcium gave an absolute sensitivity of 100%. Increasing numbers of core samples obtained containing radiographically demonstrable calcification was also associated with increasing sensitivity. Three or more cores containing calcium resulted in a 100% absolute sensitivity for malignancy. CONCLUSION: To ensure adequate sampling of calcification at core biopsy, an optimum of either three or more cores containing calcium or five or more flecks of calcium in total is required. Achieving this target ensures a high pre-operative diagnosis rate for malignant microcalcifications.Bagnall, M. J. C. (2000). Clinical Radiology 55, 548-553.     

Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of sonographic guidance for biopsy of mammographically detected suspicious microcalcifications. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with suspicious microcalcifications detected on mammography (15 associated with masses or distortion; eight with microcalcifications alone) underwent sonographically guided core biopsy (n = 18) or sonographically guided needle localization before excision (n = 5). Microcalcifications were targeted, and specimen radiographs were obtained for each lesion, with the success of the procedure based on identifying microcalcifications on the specimen radiograph. For core biopsies, the number of cores obtained was compared with that in 49 control patients who underwent sonographically guided core biopsy of noncalcified masses. RESULTS: All 23 lesions (100%) were successfully biopsied under sonographic guidance, with microcalcifications seen on specimen radiographs in each case. Of 18 core biopsies, a mean of 8.7 cores was obtained compared with a mean of 5.5 cores in the control group (p<0.0001). Of 13 lesions sampled with core biopsy that subsequently underwent surgical excision, three (23%) were upgraded from atypical ductal hyperplasia to ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 1) and from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive carcinoma (n = 2). Mammographically, most lesions contained more than 15 pleomorphic microcalcifications. On sonography, echogenic foci corresponded to microcalcifications in all but two cases in which broader echogenic regions were seen. When no mass or distortion was visible on mammography, sonography showed a mass or dilated ducts with internal echogenic foci. CONCLUSION: Microcalcifications identifiable on sonography can be successfully biopsied under sonographic guidance. Further study is necessary to determine whether targeting microcalcifications seen sonographically in the mass or duct can improve the rate of underestimation of disease compared with stereotactic core biopsy.     

Stereotactic core breast biopsy of malignant calcifications: diagnostic yield of cores with and cores without calcifications on specimen radiographs

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare core biopsy diagnosis with final diagnosis at surgical excision in cores with and cores without calcification on specimen radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred thirteen consecutive patients underwent vacuum-assisted 11- or 14-gauge needle stereotactic core biopsy for calcifications with malignant histologic results in core samples from 116 lesions. For each lesion, calcification was identified in at least one core at specimen radiography. Cores with and those without calcification seen on magnified specimen radiographs were separately submitted to and reported on by pathologists, who obtained additional levels in cores with calcification. All patients underwent surgical excision of the lesion area within 7 weeks. The pathologic diagnosis in core samples with and those without calcification on specimen radiographs was compared with final diagnosis at surgical excision. Fisher exact test was used for all chi(2) determinations of statistical significance. RESULTS: Cores with calcification on specimen radiographs were more likely to enable a final diagnosis of malignancy than were cores without calcification (98 [84%] vs 82 [71%] of 116; P =.02). Cores without calcification were significantly more likely to cause a diagnosis of cancer to be missed than were those with calcification on specimen radiographs (13 [11%] vs one [1%] of 116; P <.001). Underestimates of malignancy were more frequent in 14- than in 11-gauge specimens (11 [18%] of 60 vs six [10%] of 56; P =.30). Regardless of needle size, there was no significant difference in underestimation of malignancy between cores with and without radiographically evident calcification (17 [15%] vs 21 [18%] of 116; P =.60). CONCLUSION: Specimen radiography is essential to document calcification retrieval. Cores without radiographically demonstrated calcification may fail to show a malignant lesion. Separate identification of calcium-containing cores may assist the pathologist, who can more thoroughly evaluate these cores with additional levels of section.     

Stereotactic 14G core biopsy of non-palpable breast cancer: what is the relationship between the number of core samples taken and the sensitivity for detection of malignancy?

AIM: Percutaneous 14-gauge core biopsy (CB) guided by digital stereotactic mammography is now an established technique in the investigation of women with non-palpable suspicious mammographic lesions. Diagnostic sensitivity of CB is affected both by the nature of the mammographic abnormality and by the number of core samples taken. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective review of 500 women who have undergone CB in our institution showed that in 235 cases, invasive or non-invasive carcinoma was found on final surgical histology. Correlation between CB result and surgical histology revealed a significant increase in sensitivity for the diagnosis of malignancy if a larger number of cores were taken (84.3% for two cores and 90.2% for five cores vs. 97.9% for six or more cores). This trend was maintained when patients were subdivided according to mammographic abnormality, either soft tissue mass or microcalcifications. The effect on diagnostic sensitivity of increasing the number of tissue cores obtained was most pronounced in patients with microcalcifications graded as low or moderately suspicious for malignancy (70.1% for two cores and 79.1% for five cores vs 94.0% for six or more cores). The presence of an invasive component in a malignant lesion was correctly diagnosed using CB in 79.2% overall if at least six cores were taken. If the mammographic lesion was a soft tissue mass, this figure rose to 95.7%, but was only 35.7% if the visible lesion was composed of microcalcifications alone. CONCLUSION: Our series confirms the reliability of stereotactic CB in the diagnosis of breast carcinoma. Diagnostic sensitivity is improved by increasing the number of cores taken (to six or more), particularly in women with mammographic microcalcifications of an equivocal nature.     

Stereotactic vacuum biopsy of calcifications with a handheld portable biopsy system: a validation study

To prospectively evaluate a compact portable 10-gauge handheld battery-operated biopsy system for stereotactic biopsy of microcalcifications. The ethics committee of the hospital approved this prospective multicentric study, and informed consent was obtained. Biopsy under stereotactic guidance was performed in 215 patients for 219 lesions consisting of microcalcifications without mass. The feasibility and the tolerance of the procedure were evaluated. The mean weight of the specimen was calculated. In patients with surgical diagnoses, the underestimation rate in biopsy diagnoses of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ were evaluated. The sampled specimens were separated according to the presence of calcifications on magnified specimen radiographs and to the probe the rotation number in order to evaluate the contribution of each rotation and the contribution of the specimen with and without calcifications on the radiographs. The macrobiopsy was feasible in 98.5% of the patients and was well tolerated in 82% of patients. It identified 4.6% invasive carcinomas, 18.5% ductal carcinomas in situ, 14.8% atypical ductal hyperplasias, 22.2% benign proliferative mastopathies and 39.8% benign non-proliferative mastopathies. The underestimation rate was 26.6% when an atypical ductal hyperplasia was diagnosed at biopsy, and 7.7% when a ductal carcinoma in situ was diagnosed. In the 77 patients with surgical correlation, the accurate diagnosis was obtained in specimens sampled during the first, second, and third in 69%, 9%, and 4% of the biopsies, respectively, and the analysis of specimens without microcalcification had an added value in 8% of patients. The compact portable battery-operated biopsy system can be used successfully for stereotactic biopsy of microcalcifications and constitutes a valid alternative to current systems.     

Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic findings and clinical implications

Mammograms, specimen radiographs, and pathology reports of 51 women with ductal cancer in situ (DCIS) in 54 breasts were retrospectively analyzed. Reason for presentation was known for 44 women, including six with symptoms due to DCIS and 16 who either had been previously treated for or had (contralateral) breast cancer. Mammographic patterns of DCIS were microcalcifications in 37 of 54 (68%) lesions and calcifications within a mass in 16 (30%). Multifocal DCIS, evidenced radiographically by patterns of more than one mass, more than one cluster of microcalcifications, or parallel linear, irregular intraductal calcifications, was seen in 35 of 54 (65%) breasts but only on specimen radiographs in four of these. In 22 (41%) lesions maximum tumor expanse was greater than 2.5 cm, and all were multicentric. Multicentricity of tumor and tumor size greater than 2.5 cm may indicate need for therapies more radical than simple excision. Breast irradiation has been shown to significantly diminish recurrence rates in these patients. Mammography and specimen radiography with magnification may be appropriate in these cases to identify all possible tumor sites in the involved breast.     

Stereotaxic core needle biopsy of breast microcalcifications obtained using a standard mammography table with an add-on unit.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the reliability of stereotaxic biopsy of indeterminate microcalcifications using a standard mammography table with an add-on unit. METHODS: In 121 cases of indeterminate microcalcifications, core biopsy was performed using a standard mammography table with an add-on stereotaxic unit. Microcalcifications were identified on radiography of core specimens. RESULTS: Microcalcifications and a definitive histologic diagnosis were obtained in 112 core biopsies (92.6%), with no significant complications. In 23 lesions frank malignancy was diagnosed, and all of these diagnoses were confirmed on surgery. Pathologic examination suggested carcinoma in 4 lesions, and open biopsy confirmed malignancy in 3 of these cases. Four lesions showed atypical ductal hyperplasia. Benign disease was diagnosed in 81 lesions, of which 78 remained stable on mammographic follow-up (mean 16 months later) and 3 were subjected to surgical biopsy (of which 1 was malignant and 2 were benign). Nine cases were technically unsatisfactory because microcalcifications were not sampled. CONCLUSION: Stereotaxic core biopsy performed with an add-on unit is a safe and reliable technique for biopsy of indeterminate microcalcifications. For successful biopsy, microcalcifications must be harvested. Pathologic results should be correlated with mammographic findings. The accuracy rate compares favourably with results reported using prone biopsy tables. In an era of cost containment, this alternative to prone biopsy tables could result in significant savings in terms of capital investment and use of hospital rooms. In this study, surgical biopsy could have been avoided in 64.5% of cases.     

Stereotactic biopsy of the breast using an upright unit, a vacuum-suction needle, and a lateral arm-support system

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the vacuum-suction needle (8- to 11-gauge) on an upright stereotactic machine with a lateral arm-support system. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From July 1999 to August 2000, 185 core biopsies of the breast in 179 consecutive patients were planned in four institutions using 8- 11-gauge vacuum-suction probes on an upright stereotactic unit. Needles were stabilized and attached to the x, y, and z coordinates of the machines via a lateral arm-support system. Needle entry was made in the x-axis. RESULTS: Five patients were canceled, and 180 biopsies were performed in 174 patients while the patients were in seated (n = 171) and lateral decubitus (n = 9) positions. An average of 9.5 cores were taken (range, 5-26 cores). Targeting was successful in 176 (98%) of 180 cores. Lesions were missed because of movement associated with Parkinson's disease (n = 1), or because the mass was obscured (n = 1) or calcifications were not in the core specimen (n = 2). Findings in 152 (84%) of the biopsies were benign and 28 (16%) were malignant. Forty-one lesions underwent surgical excision and 106 underwent mammographic follow-up. Discordance was 4% (6/147). Complications included vasovagal reactions (n = 10, 5.6%), bleeding (n = 5, 3%), hematomas (n = 3, 1.7%), vomiting (n = 1, 0.6%), and technical failure (n = 1, 0.6%). CONCLUSION: Vacuum-suction needle core biopsies can be successfully performed on an upright stereotactic machine with a lateral arm attachment. Thinly compressed breasts and lesions located near the chest wall are well sampled. The vasovagal rate is higher than that on a prone table but is acceptable.     

Paraffin tissue block radiography: adjunct to breast specimen radiography

Radiography of specimens is an essential step in confirming excision of nonpalpable breast lesions. On occasion, however, the pathologist may not identify the lesion histologically. The authors report five cases in which suspicious microcalcifications were included in the excised tissue but were not identified by the pathologist. In all five, paraffin tissue block radiography enabled identification of the specific blocks containing the microcalcifications. The correct tissue blocks were then sectioned again, and the microcalcifications were identified histopathologically. In one case, the initial diagnosis of intraductal hyperplasia was changed to intraductal carcinoma with focal invasion. When the pathologist cannot identify the calcifications on initial histopathologic sections, this technique may assist in identification of the mammographic abnormality.     

Immediate postoperative mammogram for failed surgical excision of breast lesions

In a series of 200 consecutive preoperative needle localizations of non-palpable breast lesions, 128 lesions (64%) were calcified and 72 lesions (36%) were noncalcified on preoperative mammograms. Radiographs of the surgical specimen failed to confirm excision of 11 lesions (5.5%), seven calcified and four noncalcified. These 11 patients were taken directly from the surgical suite to the radiology suite, where an immediate postoperative mammogram was obtained. In five patients (2.5%), immediate postoperative mammograms showed surgical failure with the lesion still present. In six patients (3.0%), immediate postoperative mammograms showed that the lesion had been removed, even though the lesion had not been identified on surgical-specimen radiographs. No errors occurred in the interpretation of immediate postoperative mammograms, a fact corroborated by examination of surgical specimens obtained at repeat surgery in three patients and identification of skin calcifications in two patients, and with follow-up mammograms in six patients. Whenever a discrepancy between preoperative localization radiographs and surgical-specimen radiographs exists, the authors suggest immediate postoperative mammography to improve the diagnostic process.     

Breast US in patients who had microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy on screening mammography

PURPOSE: To review ultrasound (US) findings in patients who have suspicious microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy (BI-RADS category 4A) on screening mammography and to evaluate helpful findings in differentiating benign and malignant lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 2005 and July 2006, 192 patients showed microcalcifications only, without mass or associated density, on screening mammography. Among them, we selected 82 patients who had microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy (category 4A) that were pathologically confirmed by surgical excision after wire localization (n=23) or biopsy (n=59). Breast US was performed in 37/82 cases and we analyzed the US findings for the calcification areas in these patients, evaluating the findings with benign or malignant pathological results. We correlated US findings with mammographic calcifications using mammography-guided 2D-localization for the calcifications before US examination. RESULTS: There were 12 malignant lesions (32.4%) including 3 invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC), one microinvasive ductal carcinoma (MIDC), 8 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 25 benign lesions (67.6%) including 2 atypical ductal hyperplasias (ADH). IDC showed calcifications within heterogeneous hypoechoic parenchyma or calcifications within complex hypoechoic masses of taller-than-wide shape on US. One MIDC showed calcifications within heterogeneous hypoechoic parenchyma and six DCIS showed negative findings, or calcifications with a small nodule, or only calcifications on US. The most common positive US finding in benign lesions was cysts with calcifications. In 24/37 cases (64.8%) with negative US findings, 18 (75%) were benign lesions and 6 (25%) were DCIS. CONCLUSION: In patients with category 4A microcalcifications without associated findings on screening mammography, negative US findings had a high rate of benign results (18/24, 75%). Visible calcifications within heterogeneous hypoechoic parenchyma or mass on US increased the probability of malignancy.     

Digital imaging improves upright stereotactic core biopsy of mammographic microcalcifications

AIM: This comparative study was carried out to assess the effect of using digital images compared to conventional film-screen mammography on the accuracy of core biopsy of microcalcifications using upright stereotactic equipment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The biopsy results from a consecutive series of 104 upright stereotactic 14-gauge core biopsies performed with conventional X-ray (Group A) were compared with 40 biopsies carried out using stereotaxis with digital imaging (Group B). In all cases specimen radiography was performed and analysed for the presence of calcifications. Pathological correlation was then carried out with needle and surgical histology. RESULTS: The use of digital add-on equipment increased the radiographic calcification retrieval rate from 55 to 85% (P < 0.005). The absolute sensitivity of core biopsy in pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) cases rose from 34 to 69% (P < 0.03), with the complete sensitivity increasing from 52 to 94% (P < 0.005). For DCIS with or without an invasive component the absolute sensitivity rose from 41 to 67% (P = 0.052), while the complete sensitivity was 59% before and 86% after the introduction of digital imaging (P < 0.04). CONCLUSION: Digital equipment improves the performance of upright stereotactic core biopsy of microcalcifications, giving a significantly increased success rate in accurately obtaining calcifications. This leads to an improvement in absolute and complete sensitivity of core biopsy when diagnosing DCIS.     

Mastectomies after vacuum core biopsy procedure for microcalcification clusters: value of clip

Purpose

The study was performed to substantiate the value of detecting clips in mastectomy specimens as a guide to taking pathological samples.

Material and methods

We performed a retrospective review of 4 cases of mastectomy required after biopsies of microcalcifications. In each case a metallic clip had been inserted at the end of the vacuum core biopsy procedure.

Results

The study included 7 microcalcification clusters with a mean size of 6.7 mm corresponding to multifocal or relapsing ductal carcinoma in situ. Gross examination of the mastectomy specimens revealed no evidence of tumoral lesions or fibrous scar tissue. Radiographic examination of the serial slices did not detect any microcalcifications, but confirmed the presence of the clip in the 7 clusters in 4 cases. Histological examination was performed on the areas identified by the clips and detected scar tissue indicating the location of the biopsies and tumoral lesions in all the specimens.

Conclusion

In the pathological management of mastectomy specimens following vacuum core biopsies, gross examination may reveal no abnormalities and slice radiography may fail to detect microcalcifications. In such cases, radiography of the serial slices allows localisation of the metallic clips inserted during the vacuum-assisted biopsy procedure and remains the only way for the pathologist to select mastectomy specimens for microscopic analysis.     

Stereotactic breast biopsy: en bloc excision of microcalcifications with a large-bore cannula device.

OBJECTIVE: Breast calcifications pose a significant diagnostic and procedural dilemma. We evaluated en bloc stereotactic excision of indeterminate and suggestive microcalcifications for histologic diagnosis using a large-bore cannula biopsy device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 61 groups of microcalcifications removed with a large-bore cannula biopsy device from 59 patients (age range, 35-72 years old). The cannula diameter was 20 mm in 47 cases, 15 mm in nine cases, and 10 mm in five cases. The median lesion diameter was 6.6 mm (range, 4-17 mm). The procedure was performed by radiologists in an outpatient setting, with patients undergoing local anesthesia. All patients with a diagnosis of malignancy underwent surgery. RESULTS: In all instances, microcalcifications were removed in a single pass, in a single intact tissue specimen, through a maximum skin incision of 2 cm (0.8 inch). Twenty-five malignancies, 34 benign lesions, and two cases of lobular carcinoma in situ were identified. Sixteen malignancies were noninvasive and nine were invasive. No residual tumor was found at surgery in six of the 18 cases with involved margins and in five of the seven cases with uninvolved margins. One case of lobular carcinoma in situ with involvement of the margins additionally showed ductal carcinoma in situ at surgery. CONCLUSION: Mammographically identified microcalcifications are excised en bloc with the large-bore cannula biopsy device, providing a stereotactically localized tissue sample that is comparable with that obtained with open surgical biopsy and allows evaluation of the margins. This surgical radiologic procedure may represent a valid alternative, in selected patients, to conventional surgical biopsy after radiologic localization.     

DIMA enlargement mammography in microcalcifications: a prospective study with ROC analysis

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the four-fold magnification mammography (direct magnification, DIMA) technique would perform better than conventional 1.5-fold magnification mammography in the differentiation of breast microcalcifications into benign and malignant. Fifty patients with non-palpable microcalcifications detected by mammography were examined immediately prior to surgical biopsy using both a conventional (1.5-fold) and the DIMA (fourfold) magnification mammography techniques. The microcalcifications were classified by five experienced radiologists using morphological criteria. A receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of both techniques in assessing malignancy was then carried out. The DIMA mammography technique was slightly but non-significantly superior to the conventional method in detecting malignancy (p > 0.05). Coarse granular and pleomorphic calcifications were detected more frequently with the DIMA technique. Coarse calcifications were significantly more frequently associated with histologically benign findings, whereas fine granular calcifications were significantly more likely to be malignant lesions. Assessment of malignancy associated with microcalcifications using morphological criteria is not significantly improved by mammography techniques with higher magnification.     

Breast specimen microcalcifications: radiographic validation and pathologic-radiologic correlation.

A prospective analysis of specimens from location and biopsy of mammographically suspect microcalcifications in 108 patients was carried out to determine if microcalcifications were lost during histopathologic processing and the clinical relevance of such loss. Nine hundred sixty-eight paraffin blocks were prepared from 425 gross tissue slices containing calcifications identified at radiography of the specimens. Calcium was apparently lost both during preparation of the blocks (13.6%) and after slide preparation (12.6%), for a total possible loss of 26.2%. All specimens demonstrated calcification histologically. One pathology report was amended because of information obtained after recuts, but all cancers were detected on original slides whether or not calcifications were identified initially. The results indicate that, by following the suggestions offered to ensure adequate histopathologic sampling of calcification seen at mammography, most if not all of the calcification present can be detected on the original slide.     

Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector: revealing calcified chest abnormalities

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the value of dual-energy chest radiography obtained using a cesium iodide flat-panel detector in addition to standard posteroanterior chest radiography for the detection of calcified chest abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 20 patients with a total of 37 calcified chest lesions (16 pulmonary nodules, 17 mediastinal calcifications, and four pleural calcifications) as confirmed on CT. Twenty-eight locations in the chests of the same patients who were free of lesions were used as negative controls. Four radiologists reviewed posteroanterior chest radiographs in a blinded manner alone and in conjunction with dual-energy soft-tissue and bone images. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, the negative predictive value (NPV), and the positive predictive value (PPV) for lesion prediction. The Wilcoxon's and the Brunner and Langer's tests were performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: For posteroanterior chest radiography, sensitivity was 36%, the PPV was 64%, and the NPV was 47%. When dual-energy images were added, sensitivity increased significantly to 66% (p < 0.05), the PPV to 76%, and the NPV to 62%. The specificity remained constant at 73%. Brunner and Langer's test revealed a highly significant difference between posteroanterior chest radiography and dual-energy imaging in the detection of calcified chest abnormalities (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Dual-energy images added to standard posteroanterior chest radiographs significantly improve the detection of calcified chest lesions.     

Role of ultrasound and sonographically guided core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of ultrasound (US)-guided core biopsy in the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to correlate the histological results on percutaneous biopsy and surgical excision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Out of 2,423 consecutive core biopsies performed under US guidance, we evaluated 65 lesions with a histological diagnosis of DCIS. All patients underwent mammography, high-frequency broadband US and percutaneous breast biopsy with a 14-gauge needle and a mean number of five samples (range 4-7 passes). Surgical excision was performed in all cases, and the histological results on the surgical specimen were correlated with those on core biopsy samples. The sonographic features of DCIS lesions were described, comparing pure DCIS (those confirmed by definitive histology) and DCIS with invasive component at surgical excision. RESULTS: Twenty-seven out of 65 DCIS at core biopsy were found to have an invasive or microinvasive component at surgical excision, leading to rate of histological underestimation of core biopsy of 41.5%. The most frequent sonographic appearances were: (a) mass without microcalcifications (47.4% of pure DCIS, 63% of DCIS with invasive component); (b) mass with microcalcifications (23.7% of pure DCIS, 22% of DCIS with invasive component); (c) isolated microcalcifications (10.5% of pure DCIS); (d) ductal abnormalities (18.4% of pure DCIS, 15% of DCIS with invasive component). CONCLUSIONS: Due to the high underestimation rate of core biopsy, caution is mandatory in the case of DCIS diagnosis on core biopsy. Although some histological features (such as stromal fibrosis, periductal inflammatory infiltrate, high nuclear grade) can suggest the presence of an invasive component, the sonographic appearance of DCIS cannot be used to predict the cases that are underestimated on US-guided core biopsy. Nevertheless, a sonographically detectable solid component, either inside dilatated ducts or associated with microcalcifications, and a size greater than 20 mm are frequently associated with the presence of an invasive component.