间接法MR膝关节造影在膝关节损伤诊断中的价值

目的:评价SE序列T1WI、SE序列T1WI并加FS和MTC技术以及GRE序列T2*WI三种MR扫描序列在间接法关节造影中诊断膝关节半月板及韧带损伤的价值。方法:分别应用间接法MR膝关节造影三种序列对51例膝关节损伤患者进行检查,并与关节镜手术临床诊断结果比较。结果:①在诊断前交叉韧带损伤上,T2WI序列的敏感度为60%、特异度为100%、Kappa值为0.605;加FS和MTC技术T1WI序列的敏感度为81.82%、特异度为100%、Kappa值为0.825;GRE序列的敏感度为36%、特异度为100%、Kappa值为0.313;②在诊断后交叉韧带损伤上,T2WI序列的敏感度为100%、特异度为100%、Kappa值为0.827;加FS和MTC技术T1WI序列的敏感度为100%、特异度为100%、Kappa值为0.827;GRE序列的敏感度为75%、特异度为100%、Kappa值为0.759;③在诊断半月板损伤上,T1WI序列的敏感度为95.56%、特异度为98.85%、Kappa值为0.926;加FS和MTC技术T2WI序列的敏感度为95.65%、特异度为99.23%、Kappa值为0.951;GRE序列的敏感度为93.75%、特异度为99.61%、Kappa值为0.928;④在诊断侧副韧带损伤上,T1WI序列的敏感度为77.27%、特异度为98.75%、Kappa值为0.823;加FS和MTC技术T1WI序列的敏感度为90%、特异度为100%、Kappa值为0.938;GRE序列的敏感度为73.91%、特异度为98.73%、Kappa值为0.712。结论:T1WI加FS及MTC技术序列是诊断膝关节损伤病变,尤其是前交叉韧带损伤的最佳序列。     

Comparison study of indirect MR arthrography and direct MR arthrography of the shoulder

Objective  To compare the diagnostic value of indirect magnetic resonance arthrography (I-MRA) with that of direct MR arthrography (D-MRA) for labral tears, rotator cuff tears, and long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) tears using a 3-T MR unit. Materials and methods  Institutional review board approval was given; written informed consent was obtained from all patients. From November 2005 to June 2006, 19 patients (eight men and 11 women; mean age, 51 years) who had undergone both I-MRA and D-MRA underwent arthroscopic surgery. Both methods were performed in fat-saturated axial, coronal oblique, and sagittal oblique T1-weighted sequences, as well as axial and coronal oblique T2-weighted sequences. Two radiologists independently and retrospectively evaluated two sets of MRA for the diagnosis of superior and anterior labral tears, subscapularis tendon (SSC), and supraspinatus–infraspinatus tendon (SSP–ISP) tears, and LHBT tears. With the arthroscopic finding as a gold standard, we analyzed statistical differences of sensitivities and specificities between two sets of MRA and inter-observer agreement was evaluated using the kappa value. Results  The sensitivity and specificity of I-MRA and D-MRA for reader 1 were 79/80% and 71/80%, respectively, for superior labral tears; 100/100% and 100/100%, respectively, for anterior labral tears; 64/75% and 64/100%, respectively, for SSC tears; 100/86% and 100/100%, respectively, for SSP–ISP tears; and 67/100% and 78/100%, respectively, for LHBT tears. Those of I-MRA and D-MRA for reader 2 were 86/80% and 71/100%, respectively, for superior labral tears; 100/83% and 100/100%, respectively, for anterior labral tears; 64/88% and 82/100%, respectively, for SSC tears; 92/86% and 100/100%, respectively, for SSP–ISP tears; and 78/90% and 89/100%, respectively, for LHBT tears. No significant differences were found between the methods. Inter-observer agreements were higher than moderate (κ > 0.41) with both methods. Conclusions  Based on a relatively small number of patients, no significant difference was detected between I-MRI and D-MRI with regard rotator cuff, labral, and LHBT tears.     

Diagnosis of superior labral lesions: comparison of noncontrast MRI with indirect MR arthrography in unexercised shoulders

Objective To prospectively compare the accuracy of noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with indirect MR arthrography (I-MRa) of unexercised shoulders for diagnosis of superior glenoid labral lesions. Materials and methods Institutional Review Board approval and patient informed consent were obtained for this prospective study. Superior labral findings on shoulder MRI and unexercised I-MRa studies of 104 patients were correlated with findings at arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently reviewed the two sets of MR images while blinded to arthroscopic results. For each radiologist, the McNemar test was used to detect statistically significant differences between techniques. Results The superior labrum was intact in 24 and abnormal in 80 subjects. For detection of superior labral lesions by each radiologist, I-MRa was more sensitive (84–91%) than MRI (66–85%), with statistically significant improvement in sensitivity for one reader (p = 0.003). However, I-MRa was less specific (58–71%) than MRI (75–83%). Overall, accuracy was slightly improved on I-MRa (78–86%) compared with MRI (70–83%), but this difference was not statistically significant for either reader. Conclusion Compared with noncontrast MRI, I-MRa was more sensitive for diagnosis of superior glenoid labral lesions. However, the diagnostic value of I-MRa in shoulders remaining at rest is potentially limited by decreased specificity of the technique. The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.     

肩关节MR造影对肩关节前方盂唇病变的诊断价值

目的明确肩关节造影MR对肩关节前方盂唇病变的诊断价值，并比较中立位肩关节造影MR和外展外旋（abduction and external rotation, ABER）造影MR的价值。方法回顾性分析经证实的44例肩关节造影MR资料，以肩关节镜检查结果为金标准，对比中立位肩关节造影MR和ABER造影MR对肩关节前方盂唇病变的诊断价值。结果中立位肩关节造影MR对前方盂唇的诊断敏感度为79．3％（23／29），特异度为100％（15／15），准确度为86．4％（38／44）；ABER造影MR的敏感度为93．1％（27／29），特异度为100％（15／15），准确度为95．5％（42／44）。ABER造影MR显著提高了前方盂唇病变的诊断敏感度（P=0．037）。结论ABER造影MR可以提高肩关节前方盂唇病变的诊断敏感度。     

Technical errors in MR arthrography

This article discusses potential technical problems of MR arthrography. It starts with contraindications, followed by problems relating to injection technique, contrast material and MR imaging technique. For some of the aspects discussed, there is only little published evidence. Therefore, the article is based on the personal experience of the author and on local standards of procedures. Such standards, as well as medico-legal considerations, may vary from country to country. Contraindications for MR arthrography include pre-existing infection, reflex sympathetic dystrophy and possibly bleeding disorders, avascular necrosis and known allergy to contrast media. Errors in injection technique may lead to extra-articular collection of contrast agent or to contrast agent leaking from the joint space, which may cause diagnostic difficulties. Incorrect concentrations of contrast material influence image quality and may also lead to non-diagnostic examinations. Errors relating to MR imaging include delays between injection and imaging and inadequate choice of sequences. Potential solutions to the various possible errors are presented.     

3.0 T conventional hip MR and hip MR arthrography for the acetabular labral tears confirmed by arthroscopy

Objective

To evaluate the value of hip MR for diagnosing acetabular labrum tears, and to further compare the diagnostic performances of conventional MR with MR arthrography in acetabular labrum tears.

Methods

90 patients undergoing both hip MR examination and subsequent hip arthroscopy were retrospectively evaluated. Of these patients, 34 accepted both conventional MR and MR arthrography; while the other 56 only underwent conventional MR examination. All hip MR images were independently reviewed by two radiologists, and further compared with the results of hip arthroscopy.

Results

59 of 90 patients were confirmed with acetabular labral tears by hip arthroscopy and 31 without tears. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of conventional MR for evaluating the acetabular labral tears were 61.0%, 77.4%, 83.7% and 51.1% (radiologist A), and 66.1%, 74.2%, 82.9% and 53.4% (radiologist B), respectively, with good consistency between the two observers (K = 0.645). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of MR arthrography for assessing the acetabular labral tears were 90.5%, 84.6%, 90.5% and 84.6% (radiologist A), and 95.2%, 84.6%, 90.9% and 91.7% (radiologist B), respectively, with excellent good consistency between the two observers (K = 0.810). The sensitivity and NPV of MR arthrography for diagnosing the acetabular labral tears were significantly higher than those of conventional MR (both P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Hip MR arthrography is a reliable evaluation modality for diagnosing the acetabular labral tears, and its diagnostic performance is superior to that of conventional MR at 3.0 T.     

肩袖撕裂的肩关节MR造影评价

目的 评价肩关节MR造影对肩袖撕裂的诊断价值。方法 分析32例病人的肩关节MR造影图像,评价内容包括肩袖肌腱、盂唇、肱二头肌长头腱,结果与肩关节镜及肩部开放手术比较。结果 以肩关节镜和手术结果为标准,32例病人包括14例全层撕裂,6例下表面部分撕裂,12例无撕裂。肩关节MR造影判定有无肩袖撕裂的敏感性、特异性和准确性都为100％;诊断全层撕裂的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为100％、94％和97％。同时,肩关节MR造影还正确诊断了所有的多肌腱撕裂、合并的盂唇异常及肱二头肌长头腱异常。结论 肩关节MR造影可以准确、全面地评价肩袖撕裂。     

Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: evaluation with MR arthrography

The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography for diagnosing adhesive capsulitis. Shoulder MR images of 28 patients with (n=14) and without (n=14) adhesive capsulitis were retrospectively analyzed. MR images were assessed for capsule and synovium thickness as well as the width of the axillary recess on oblique coronal fat-suppressed T1-weighted images and T2-weighted images, respectively. On oblique sagittal fat-suppressed T1-weighted images, the width of the rotator interval and the presence of abnormal tissue in the interval were evaluated. Significant differences were found between the two groups in capsule and synovium thickness on both sides of the recess on oblique coronal T2-weighted images (P=0.000), whereas thickness on the humeral aspect showed no significant difference on oblique coronal fat-suppressed T1-weighted images (P=0.109). On oblique coronal T2-weighted images, a cut-off value of 3-mm thickness gave the highest diagnostic accuracy for adhesive capsulitis with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 79% (11/14), 100% (14/14), and 89% (25/28) at the humeral side and 93% (13/14), 86% (12/14), and 89% (25/28) at the glenoid side, respectively. There were significant differences in rotator interval width, presence of abnormal tissue in the rotator interval, and axillary recess width between the two groups (P<0.05). Thickness of capsule and synovium of the axillary recess greater than 3 mm is a practical MR criterion for diagnosing adhesive capsulitis when measured on oblique coronal T2-weighted MR arthrography images without fat suppression. The presence of abnormal tissue in the rotator interval showed high sensitivity but rather low specificity.     

3D-SPACE序列在肩关节MR造影中评估上盂唇前后撕裂

目的：评价肩关节 MR造影三维各向同性脂肪抑制快速自旋回波（SPACE）序列对上盂唇前后撕裂（SLAP损伤）的诊断价值。方法：影像诊断医师回顾性分析经关节镜证实的肩关节 MR 造影图像,判定有无SLAP 损伤及分型,对比常规二维序列和SPACE序列对SLAP损伤的敏感度、特异度及准确率,比较常规二维序列与SPACE 序列的诊断价值。结果：肩关节镜证实SLAP损伤12例,肩关节 MR造影SPACE序列与常规二维序列对SLAP 损伤的敏感度分别为83．33％（10/12）及91．67％（11/12）,特异度分别为81．25％（13/16）及87．50％（14/16）,准确度分别为82．14％（23/28）及89．29％（25/28）。SPACE序列与常规二维序列对 SLAP 损伤的诊断效能无明显统计学差异（P＞0．05）。结论：肩关节MR造影中SPACE序列是评价SLAP损伤准确、可靠的影像学方法。     

Depiction of the triangular fibro-cartilage in patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain: comparison of direct multi-slice CT arthrography and direct MR arthrography

To compare direct multi-slice CT arthrography (MSCT-AG) and direct MR arthrography (MR-AG) of the wrist with regard to the depiction of the triangular fibro-cartilage (TFC). Fifteen consecutive patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain suspicious for TFC tear underwent both MSCT-AG and MR-AG of the wrist. Images obtained were evaluated by two radiologists in a blinded fashion for the depiction of six anatomical areas (radial, central and ulnar portion on the proximal and distal side) of the TFC by means of a five-point scoring system (1 = excellent visibility to 5 = not visible). Scores for MSCT-AG and MR-AG were compared using the Student's t-test. Mean scores for MSCT-AG and MR-AG, respectively, were 2.5/2.0, 3.2/2.5 and 2.8/2.4 for the radial, central and ulnar portion of the TFC on its proximal side, and 2.7/2.0, 3.1/2.3 and 2.9/2.4 for the radial, central and ulnar portion on its distal side (n = 15). Paired Student's t-test showed no significant difference between MSCT-AG and MR-AG (P > 0.05). In a first, small series, depiction of the TFC with MSCT-AG is comparable to that of MR-AG. Further evaluation of direct multi-slice CT arthrography of the wrist in a larger patient population would be promising.     

The scapholunate interosseous ligament in MR arthrography of the wrist: correlation with non-enhanced MRI and wrist arthroscopy

 Objective. To compare three-compartment MR wrist arthrography with non-enhanced MRI in correlation with wrist arthroscopy, and to evaluate the potential of MR arthrography for consistently visualizing all parts of the scapholunate interosseous ligament of the wrist (SLIL) and exactly diagnosing the site and extent of SLIL defects. Design and Patients. In 41 patients with wrist pain (34 patients with wrist pain for more than 6 months) plain radiographs, stress views, non-enhanced MRI and three-compartment MR arthrography were done within 2 h of each other, using three-dimensional volume acquisition (0.6–1.0 mm effective slice thickness) with a gradient-recalled echo sequence and a 1.5-T magnet. The MR arthrography findings were compared with the findings from non-enhanced MRI and correlated with the arthroscopic findings in all patients. Results. The dorsal, central and palmar segments of the SLIL could be delineated exactly by MR arthrography in 95% of the patients; with non-enhanced MRI only 28% of SLIL segments were seen consistently. Demonstration of SLIL defects was possible with high diagnostic confidence in 42% of SLIL segments by non-enhanced MRI and in 94% by MR arthrography. With wrist arthroscopy as the standard of reference, sensitivity and specificity values for SLIL perforations were 52%/34% for non-enhanced MRI and 90%/87% for MR arthrography. Conclusions. MR arthrography, using three-dimensional volume acquisition with thin slices (0.6–1.0 mm), combines the advantages of three-compartment arthrography and non-enhanced MRI. It shows the precise location and magnitude of ligamentous defects of all parts of the SLIL, correlates well with wrist arthroscopy and has potential implications for diagnosis and treatment planning.     

MR直接关节造影在腕三角纤维软骨复合体损伤中的应用

目的 通过与腕关节镜结果对照,探讨MR直接关节造影在腕三角纤维软骨复合体(TFCC)损伤中的作用.方法 14例临床怀疑腕TFCC损伤的患者接受了常规MRI和MR直接关节造影,其中10例行腕关节镜检查.MR直接关节造影在腕拇长伸肌腱与伸指总肌腱间隙(相当于桡舟关节间隙)处进针,注入5～7 ml的钆喷替酸葡甲胺(0.1 mmol/L)混合液(0.3 ml钆喷替酸葡甲胺+100 ml生理盐水),与腕关节镜结果相对照,分析常规MRI和MR直接关节造影表现.结果 (1)14例中TFCC尺侧撕裂5例,桡侧撕裂4例,整体损伤5例(包括2例长期类风湿关节炎).(2)在脂肪抑制序列(STIR)及T2和T1WI序列上,损伤的TFCC表现为高信号或等信号,正常的低信号部分或完全消失,MR直接关节造影显示4例桡侧撕裂在腕TFCC的下尺桡关节和5例尺侧撕裂在尺骨茎突附着处可见不同程度的高信号对比剂聚集,5例整体损伤在下尺桡关节和尺骨茎突附着处均可见对比剂.MR直接关节造影表现与腕关节镜结果在损伤部位相符合,包括4例桡侧撕裂,3例尺侧撕裂和3例整体损伤.(3)14例腕TFCC损伤患者,8例伴有下尺桡关节半脱位,6例伴有尺桡骨骨挫伤,常规MRI和MR直接关节造影均可清晰地显示其滑膜反应和骨髓水肿等表现.结论 MR直接关节造影可以清晰地显示腕TFCC损伤,同时与常规MRI相结合能显示伴随的滑膜反应和骨髓水肿.     

MRI扩散加权成像对乳腺良恶性病变的诊断

目的:探讨磁共振扩散加权成像(DWI)对乳腺良恶性疾病的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析40例经病理确诊的乳腺疾病,其中良性病变22个,恶性病变18个;均行DWI检查,测定病灶区表观扩散系数(ADC值),与正常组织进行比较,计算相对表观扩散系数(rADC值),应用SPSS 16.0软件比较其平均值,并以病理结果为金标准,作ROC曲线,求其最佳诊断阈值。结果:良性病变及恶性病变的ADC值分别为(1.55±0.35)×10-3和1.00±0.18)×10-3 mm2/s,其rADC值分别为(0.82±0.19)和(0.52±0.08)。良恶性病变组间均有统计学差异,以ADC值及rADC值为诊断标准作受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线),其中ADC值的曲线下面积(AUC)为(0.927±0.04),rADC值的AUC为(0.965±0.03),诊断阈值分别为1.17×10-3 mm2/s、0.66,相应敏感度及特异度分别为(90.9%、88.9%)和(95.5%、94.4%),rADC值的AUC、敏感度及特异度均高于ADC值。结论:DWI对乳腺良恶性病变的的诊断具有重要作用,其中rADC值有更好诊断效能。     

Comparison of multislice CT arthrography and MR arthrography for the detection of articular cartilage lesions of the elbow

The objective of this study was to compare the value of multislice CT arthrography and MR arthrography in the assessment of cartilage lesions of the elbow joint. Twenty-six cadaveric elbow specimens were examined with the use of CT arthrography and MR arthrography prior to joint exploration and macroscopic inspection of articular cartilage. Findings at CT and MR arthrography were compared with macroscopic assessments in 104 cartilage areas. At macroscopic inspection, 45 cartilage lesions (six grade 2 lesions, 25 grade 3 lesions, 14 grade 4 lesions) and 59 areas of normal articular cartilage were observed. With macroscopic assessment as the gold standard CT and MR arthrography showed an overall sensitivity/specificity of 80/93% and 78/95% for the detection of cartilage lesions, respectively. Only two of six grade 2 lesions were detected by CT and MR arthrography. For the diagnosis of grade 3 and 4 lesions, the sensitivity/specificity was 87/94% with CT arthrography, and 85/95% with MR arthrography. In an experimental setting multislice CT arthrography and MR arthrography showed a similar performance in the detection of cartilage lesions. Both methods indicated limited value in the diagnosis of grade 2 articular cartilage lesions.     

MR arthrography of elbow: evaluation of the ulnar collateral ligament of elbow

 Objective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury of the elbow in throwing athletes by MRI and MR arthrography. Design. Ten elbows of throwing athletes were examined on both plain MRI and MR saline arthrography and the injuries subsequently surgically proven. Spin-echo (SE) T1-weighted and fast SE T2-weighted coronal images were obtained. Results. The UCL was unclear in all ten cases on T1-weighted MRI. In five cases an avulsion fracture was also found on T1-weighted MRI. On T2-weighted MRI, abnormal high-intensity areas were identified in or around the UCL. On T2-weighted MR arthrography images, extracapsular high-intensity areas, which represent extracapsular leakage, were found in four of five cases with avulsion fracture. At surgery, all these four cases showed avulsion fractures with instability; the other case had a fracture but it was stable and adherent to the humerus. On T2-weighted MR arthrography images, an extracapsular high-intensity area was found in one of the five cases without avulsion fracture. At surgery this patient had a complete tear of the UCL itself. Conclusion. MR arthrography provided additional information for evaluating the degree of UCL injury.     

肩袖损伤的影像学及关节镜诊疗价值

目的探讨肩袖损伤的影像学改变及关节镜检查在诊疗中的价值。方法18例肩袖损伤术前行造影和磁共振成像(MRI)。关节镜手术18例，其中关节镜下肩峰成形减压术16例，小切口肩峰成形2例。全层肩袖损伤10例行小切口肩袖缝合，肩袖部分磨损8例行关节镜下刨削清理术。结果肩关节造影13例，其中9例显示肩关节腔与肩峰下滑囊和三角肌下滑囊沟通，4例未见异常。MRI检查18例，其中10例显示肩袖全层损伤，8例冈上肌腱信号异常为部分损伤。根据关节镜检查结果判断其诊断准确率，MRI为100％，肩关节造影69％。术后随访时间3～22个月，平均7个月。根据美国加州洛杉矶大学(UCLA)肩关节评分标准，优9例，良6例，可3例，优良率达83％。结论肩关节造影有助于全层肩袖损伤的诊断；MRI对肩袖部分和全层损伤正确诊断率和敏感性最高；关节镜治疗肩袖损伤具有微创，有利于功能恢复。     

常规MRI与MR关节造影诊断肩袖撕裂的初步对比研究

目的 比较3.0T常规MRI和MR关节造影检查对肩袖撕裂的诊断价值.方法 分析48例肩关节病变患者的常规MRI和MR关节造影检查资料,确定肩袖有无撕裂并进行分型.其中4例行肩关节镜检查.采用配对x2检验比较两种检查方法诊断肩袖撕裂的差异性.结果 常规MRI显示冈上肌腱全层撕裂6例,冈上肌腱部分撕裂9例;MR关节造影显示冈上肌腱全层撕裂7例,冈上肌腱部分撕裂8例.常规MRI和MR关节造影检查方法对肩袖全层撕裂诊断有6例相同,1例常规MRI诊断无撕裂MR关节造影诊断为撕裂;对肩袖部分撕裂的诊断有7例相同,3例不同,其中2例常规MRI诊断为撕裂而MR关节造影诊断为无撕裂,1例常规MRI诊断为无撕裂而MR关节造影诊断为撕裂;两种检查方法对肩袖全层撕裂(x2=0.000,P＞0.05)及部分撕裂(x2=o.000,P＞0.05)的诊断差异无统计学意义.结论 初步显示3.0T常规MRI对肩袖全层撕裂和肩袖部分撕裂的诊断能达到MR关节造影的诊断效果,同时可以显示肩袖撕裂伴发的各种异常.     

磁共振尿路造影在临床泌尿道梗阻中的诊断价值

目的：评估磁共振尿路造影在临床泌尿道梗阻中的诊断价值。方法：回顾性对61例例泌尿系统梗阻患者的的MRU检查所见与手术和病理结果对照分析。结果：61例泌尿系梗阻患者，输尿管癌7例，输尿管结石8例，下腔静脉后输尿管1例，输尿管良性狭窄11例，先天性输尿管狭窄27例，膀胱癌侵及输尿管4例，泌尿系改道手术后再次发生良性梗阻患者3例，所有病例MRU均确定梗阻水平并且清晰显示梗阻端形态和特征。结论：NMR是一种安全、可靠、无创的检查方法，尤对IVU不显影或仅显示扩张的肾盏、肾孟影的重度肾积水病例或对比剂过敏的患者更有诊断价值。     

3-T direct MR arthrography of the wrist: Value of finger trap distraction to assess intrinsic ligament and triangular fibrocartilage complex tears

Purpose

To determine the value of applying finger trap distraction during direct MR arthrography of the wrist to assess intrinsic ligament and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears.

Materials and methods

Twenty consecutive patients were prospectively investigated by three-compartment wrist MR arthrography. Imaging was performed with 3-T scanners using a three-dimensional isotropic (0.4 mm) T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence, with and without finger trap distraction (4 kg). In a blind and independent fashion, two musculoskeletal radiologists measured the width of the scapholunate (SL), lunotriquetral (LT) and ulna-TFC (UTFC) joint spaces. They evaluated the amount of contrast medium within these spaces using a four-point scale, and assessed SL, LT and TFCC tears, as well as the disruption of Gilula's carpal arcs.

Results

With finger trap distraction, both readers found a significant increase in width of the SL space (mean Δ = +0.1 mm, p ≤ 0.040), and noticed more contrast medium therein (p ≤ 0.035). In contrast, the differences in width of the LT (mean Δ = +0.1 mm, p ≥ 0.057) and UTFC (mean Δ = 0 mm, p ≥ 0.728) spaces, as well as the amount of contrast material within these spaces were not statistically significant (p = 0.607 and ≥0.157, respectively). Both readers detected more SL (Δ = +1, p = 0.157) and LT (Δ = +2, p = 0.223) tears, although statistical significance was not reached, and Gilula's carpal arcs were more frequently disrupted during finger trap distraction (Δ = +5, p = 0.025).

Conclusion

The application of finger trap distraction during direct wrist MR arthrography may enhance both detection and characterisation of SL and LT ligament tears by widening the SL space and increasing the amount of contrast within the SL and LT joint spaces.     

磁共振动态增强、扩散加权成像联合应用对乳腺病变的诊断价值

目的：探讨单一磁共振动态增强扫描诊断试验、扩散加权成像诊断试验及其联合应用对乳腺病变定性诊断的敏感性、特异性和阳性似然比、阴性似然比,比较其诊断效能。方法：对临床拟诊肿块的患者37例,同时进行动态增强扫描和扩散加权成像检查,均获得手术和病理证实,其中良性病灶18个,恶性病灶19个。对病变的边缘、形态特征、动态增强表现及时间一信号强度曲线采用评分法对病变性质分恶性、可疑恶性及良性三组进行判断。参照动态增强病变位置确定扩散图像病变所在,描记扩散图像上病变的感兴趣区,由软件计算获得表观扩散系数（ADC）值。对获取数据进行统计分析,采用t检验统计学方法进行良性和恶性ADC值比较。联合动态增强扫描和ADC值,采用评分法根据积分情况进行综合定性诊断。比较动态增强扫描、DWI ADC值及联合应用对乳腺病变定性诊断效能。结果：动态增强扫描（病灶边缘、形态学表现结合时间-信号强度曲线）诊断乳腺病变的敏感性、特异性和阳性似然比、阴性似然比分别为89．5％、72．2％和3．221、0．146。良性病变组ADC值1．474±0．441（×100^-3mm^2／s）,恶性病变组ADC值1．082±0．160（×10^-3mm^2／s）,两者间有显著统计学差异（P=0．002,〈0．05）。ADC值诊断敏感性、特异性和阳性似然比、阴性似然比分别为94．7％、66．7％和2．842、0．079。动态增强扫描和DWI-ADC值联合诊断的敏感性、特异性和阳性似然比、阴性似然比分别为94．7％、83．3％和5．684、0．063。结论：磁共振动态增强、扩散加权成像联合应用对乳腺病变的定性诊断敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比均较单一动态增强扫描或扩散成像诊断效能强。