Clinical profile and recovery pattern of dysphagia in the COVID-19 patient: A prospective observational cohort within NSW

BackgroundThe impact of COVID-19 on swallowing function is not well understood. Despite low hospital admission rates in Australia, the virus and subsequent treatment affects swallow function in those requiring intensive care unit (ICU) treatment. As such, the current pandemic provides a unique opportunity to describe swallowing function and outline dysphagia characteristics and trajectory of recovery for a series of cases across NSW.AimThe aims of this study were to describe (i) physiological characteristics of swallowing dysfunction and (ii) pattern of swallowing recovery and outcomes, in ICU patients with COVID-19.MethodsAll patients admitted to 17 participating NSW Health ICU sites over a 12-month period (March 2020–March 2021), diagnosed with COVID-19, treated with the aim for survival, and seen by a speech pathologist for clinical swallowing examination during hospital admission were considered for inclusion. Demographic, critical care airway management, speech pathology treatment, and swallowing outcome data were collected.ResultsTwenty-seven patients (22 male; 5 female) with a median age of 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 15.5) were recruited. All required mechanical ventilation. Almost 90% of the total cohort had pre-existing comorbidities, with the two most frequently observed being diabetes (63%, 95% confidence interval = 44%–78%) and cardiac disease (59%, 95% confidence interval = 40%–75%) in origin. Prevalence of dysphagia was 93%, with the majority (44%) exhibiting profound dysphagia at the initial assessment. Median duration to initiate oral feeding was 38.5 days (IQR = 31.25) from ICU admission, and 33% received dysphagia rehabilitation. Dysphagia recovery was observed in 81% with a median duration of 44 days (IQR = 29). Positive linear associations were identified between duration of intubation, mechanical ventilation, hospital and ICU length of stay, and the duration to speech pathology assessment (p < 0.005), dysphagia severity (p < 0.002), commencing oral intake (p < 0.02), dysphagia recovery (p < 0.004), and enteral feeding (p < 0.024).ConclusionCOVID-19 considerably impacted swallowing function in the current study. Although many patients recovered within an acceptable timeframe, some experienced persistent severe dysphagia and a protracted recovery with dependence on enteral nutrition.     

Triaging dysphagia: nurse screening for dysphagia in an acute hospital

Aims and objectives. To (1) develop a dysphagia screening tool to triage all patients at risk of aspiration/dysphagia on admission to acute hospital wards, (2) evaluate tool reliability, (3) evaluate nursing compliance and (4) develop a robust dysphagia training programme. Background. Failure to diagnose dysphagia has significant medical and economic costs. Dysphagia screening reduces pneumonia threefold. Most nurse‐screening tools have focused on stroke. However, many other conditions are associated with dysphagia. A multidisciplinary team developed a nurse‐administered, evidence‐based swallow screening tool for generic acute hospital use. Design. Prospective, quasi‐experimental. Methods. Nurses were assessed for knowledge pre‐ and post‐training. All patients were nurse‐screened for dysphagia on admission. All patients were reviewed by speech pathologists to determine screening accuracy. Results were not blinded. The one page tool encompassed (1) diagnostic categories, (2) patient/carer interview, (3) dysphagia indicators and (4) if applicable, water swallow test. Results. Thirty‐eight nurses participated in a seven‐week study; 442 patients were screened on two general medical wards. Three speech pathologists counter‐assessed each patient by clinical examination or chart review. Sensitivity was 95%; specificity was 97%. Positive predictive value was 92%; negative predictive value was 98%. 3·4% of clinical screening decisions were incorrect. Compliance rate was 85%. Conclusions. Caution is advised in interpretation of the results due to lack of blinding. Initial results suggest that the dysphagia screening tool is a quick and robust tool for triaging individuals with dysphagia. Training is critical to successful screening. Relevance to clinical practice. Twenty‐five to 30% of acute hospitalised individuals have dysphagia. All adult acute patients are screened for dysphagia using the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital dysphagia screening tool. Patients are triaged into categories of ‘those requiring additional specialist intervention’ and ‘those who can proceed directly to regular diets and liquids’. Improved quality of care and cost savings is likely.     

Identification of a simple screening tool for dysphagia in patients with stroke using factor analysis of multiple dysphagia variables.

OBJECTIVE: To identify a most useful and simple clinical screening tool to predict videofluoroscopic aspiration in patients with stroke.Design: Factor analysis of multiple dysphagia variables and sensitivity and specificity testing with chi-square test. PATIENTS: Sixty-one consecutive stroke patients with symptoms suggestive of dysphagia admitted to a university hospital and its 4 affiliated hospitals in Japan. METHODS: Factors were extracted from 6 oromotor examinations (lip closure, tongue movement, palatal elevation, gag reflex, voice quality and motor speech function), 2 swallow screen tests (saliva swallowing test and our modified water swallowing test using 30 ml of water) and 4 parameters evaluated with a videofluoroscopic swallow study. Sensitivity and specificity of each dysphagia-related variable was determined against aspiration in a videofluoroscopic swallow study. RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed that cough/voice change in the water swallowing test and aspiration on videofluoroscopic swallow study belonged to the same factor. Chi-square analysis showed that cough/voice change in the water swallowing test was the only variable that was significantly associated with aspiration on videofluoroscopic swallow study, with a sensitivity of 72% (95% CI: 61-83%) and a specificity of 67% (CI: 55-79%) as a predictor of aspiration (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: We recommend our modified 30 ml water-swallowing test as a useful single task-screening tool to detect aspiration.     

Use of a Paper Checklist to Increase Clinician Adherence to Mammography Screening Guidelines

ObjectiveTo increase clinician adherence to mammography screening guidelines.DesignQuality improvement initiative.Setting/Local ProblemAt a nurse practitioner–led primary care practice, a chart audit of adherence to American Cancer Society mammography screening guidelines indicated a 12% adherence rate for clinicians writing mammography orders.ParticipantsNurse practitioners providing care to women ages 40 years and older.Intervention/MeasurementsThe intervention was a screening checklist that was completed by the woman at registration and given to the clinician during the examination. The pre- and postintervention measurement was the percentage of mammogram orders. A Fisher exact test was used to examine changes from pre- to postintervention rates of adherence.ResultsAfter the intervention, the percentage of women for whom a mammogram was recommended and ordered was 69.6%, compared to 12% from the original chart audit. This change was statistically significant (p = .01).ConclusionClinicians must find efficient approaches to improve processes within their practice settings to ensure that preventive care recommendations are made during visits. Although the screening checklist was deemed useful, improvement in adherence rates is still needed, and a paperless system should be initiated.     

Accuracy of a Bedside Dysphagia Screening: A Comparison of Registered Nurses and Speech Therapists

Evidence‐based guidelines suggest that stroke patients should be screened for dysphagia before oral intake. The purpose of this study was to validate a dysphagia screening tool comparing registered nurses (RNs) with speech therapists (STs). All stroke unit patients who received predetermined scores on specific items of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale were eligible for screening. The trial consisted of three parts (with swallow, cough, and vocal quality observed during each part): 1 teaspoon lemon ice, 1 teaspoon applesauce, and 1 teaspoon water. RNs performed five screenings that were compared with independent screenings performed on the same patient within 1 hour by a speech therapist (ST). Eighty‐three paired screenings were completed, with 94% agreement between the RNs and the STs. This screening identifies patients who are able to swallow and can eat from a safe menu until formally evaluated by an ST while maintaining nothing by mouth (NPO) status for those at risk for aspiration.     

Development of a modified swallowing screening tool to manage post‐extubation dysphagia

Post‐extubation dysphagia is a condition that is becoming a growing concern. The condition occurs in 3–62% of extubated patients and can be related to mixed aetiologies, such as neuromuscular impairment, critical illness and laryngeal damage. The risk factors for developing dysphagia in critically ill patients are under‐diagnosed and perhaps underestimated. Recent studies recommend the implementation of a standardized swallowing screen to prevent aspiration and decrease pneumonia rate and mortality. The aim of this quality improvement initiative was the development of a bedside swallowing screening tool to assess effective swallowing post‐endotracheal extubation. Post‐extubation dysphagia can result in a delay in re‐feeding, with the potential for malnutrition as well as overt and covert aspiration if swallowing is not effectively screened. It is apparent that ICU nurses commence the initial screen for swallowing in the absence of an evidence base of care. A review of current local and international practice guidelines excludes the process of an effective swallowing screen of the extubated patient. Previously, a referral to speech and language therapists would be required to assess swallowing only after an initial review by the ICU medical team. This often leads to delays if the referral is made outside normal working practice, such as weekends or evenings. The initial development of a swallowing screening tool is the first step to promoting a nurse‐led/‐initiated bedside swallow screening tool that will enhance patient care and patient safety. There is growing body of evidence regarding the incidence of post‐extubation dysphagia. Currently, there are very few recognized bedside swallowing screening tools to identify patients at risk. The most serious complication associated with post‐extubation dysphagia is aspiration pneumonia, which is the leading cause of nosocomial infection in the critically ill patient.     

Swallow Screen Associated With Airway Protection and Dysphagia After Acute Stroke

ObjectiveThe goal was to examine the outcomes of an existing swallow screen protocol in comparison to results from a formal videofluoroscopic protocol.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingAcute hospital.ParticipantsPatients after acute stroke (N=48).InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresThe Johns Hopkins Hospital Brain Rescue Unit 3 oz Swallow Screen was implemented by nursing staff upon admission. Videofluoroscopy was conducted within 72 hours of diagnostic neuroimaging and initial swallow screen. Predictive values of the bedside swallow screen (pass/fail) for clinical judgment of dysphagia on videofluoroscopy (presence/absence) were calculated. Overall impairment scores from the Modified Barium Swallowing Impairment Profile were analyzed with respect to swallow screen results.ResultsThirteen participants failed the swallow screen, and 35 passed. Of the 35 patients who passed the swallow screen, 15 were clinically diagnosed with dysphagia on videofluoroscopy. Although pass/fail of the swallow screen was not a significant predictor of presence/absence of dysphagia, a logistic regression model including components of Laryngeal Elevation, Laryngeal Vestibule Closure, and Anterior Hyoid Excursion, and sex was statistically significant for swallow screen outcome.ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that a swallow screen of aspiration risk can identify patients with the most need for videofluoroscopic evaluation and dysphagia management. Additionally, patients who fail a swallow screen are more likely to present with physiologic impairments related to airway protection on videofluoroscopy.     

Swallowing in individuals with disorders of consciousness: A cohort study

BackgroundAfter a period of coma, a proportion of individuals with severe brain injury remain in an altered state of consciousness before regaining partial or complete recovery. Individuals with disorders of consciousness (DOC) classically receive hydration and nutrition through an enteral-feeding tube. However, the real impact of the level of consciousness on an individual's swallowing ability remains poorly investigated.ObjectiveWe aimed to document the incidence and characteristics of dysphagia in DOC individuals and to evaluate the link between different components of swallowing and the level of consciousness.MethodsWe analyzed clinical data on the respiratory status, oral feeding and otolaryngologic examination of swallowing in DOC individuals. We analyzed the association of components of swallowing and participant groups (i.e., unresponsive wakefulness syndrome [UWS] and minimally conscious state [MCS]).ResultsWe included 92 individuals with DOC (26 UWS and 66 MCS). Overall, 99% of the participants showed deficits in the oral and/or pharyngeal phase of swallowing. As compared with the MCS group, the UWS group more frequently had a tracheostomy (69% vs 24%), with diminished cough reflex (27% vs 54%) and no effective oral phase (0% vs 21%).ConclusionAlmost all DOC participants had severe dysphagia. Some components of swallowing (i.e., tracheostomy, cough reflex and efficacy of the oral phase of swallowing) were related to consciousness. In particular, no UWS participant had an efficient oral phase, which suggests that its presence may be a sign of consciousness. In addition, no UWS participant could be fed entirely orally, whereas no MCS participant orally received ordinary food. Our study also confirms that objective swallowing assessment can be successfully completed in DOC individuals and that specific care is needed to treat severe dysphagia in DOC.     

Assessing the laryngeal cough reflex and the risk of developing pneumonia after stroke

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of a new reflex cough test, using nebulized tartaric acid, in the evaluation of the laryngeal cough reflex and the development of aspiration pneumonia. STUDY DESIGN: In this two-phase study, the cough test assessed the cough reflex in 161 stroke subjects. Phase 1 was a double-blinded prospective study of 40 subjects scheduled to have both modified barium swallow and the reflex cough test. Phase 1 subjects with an abnormal cough test showed an increased pneumonia incidence, and therefore, phase 2 was not blinded. In phase 2, 121 subjects were evaluated using the cough test; 38 received a modified barium swallow. Test results were compared using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: A total of 131 subjects from both phases had a normal reflex cough test; none developed pneumonia (p < .01). Thirty subjects from both phases had abnormal reflex cough test results; 5 developed pneumonia. Modified barium swallow findings did not reliably indicate the risk for developing pneumonia. Specificity of a normal reflex cough test was 100%. CONCLUSION: The reflex cough test reliably evaluated the laryngeal cough reflex and the associated risk of developing aspiration pneumonia in stroke patients. Testing the laryngeal cough reflex may significantly reduce morbidity, mortality, and costs in stroke patients.     

Identification of dysphagia using the Toronto Bedside Swallowing Screening Test (TOR-BSST©): Are 10 teaspoons of water necessary?

Abstract

Dysphagia screening often includes administration of water. This study assessed the accuracy in identifying dysphagia with each additional teaspoon of water. The original research of the TOR-BSST^© permitted this assessment. Trained nurses from acute and rehabilitation facilities prospectively administered the TOR-BSST^© to 311 eligible stroke inpatients. A sensitivity analysis was conducted for the water item using 10 teaspoons plus a sip as the standard. The proportion of positive screenings was 59.2% in acute and 38.5% in rehabilitation. Of all four items that form the TOR-BSST^©, the water swallow item contributed to the identification of dysphagia in 42.7% in acute and 29.0% in rehabilitation patients. Across all patients, dysphagia accuracy was that five teaspoons resulted in a sensitivity of 79% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 70–86), eight a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI = 85–96) and 10 a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI = 90–99). Although a primary contributor, the water swallow item alone does not identify all patients with dysphagia. For a water swallow to accurately identify dysphagia, it is critical to administer 10 teaspoons. The TOR-BSST^© water swallow item contributes largely to the total TOR-BSST^©'s screening score and in making the test highly accurate and reliable.     

Comparison of cough reflex testing with videoendoscopy in recently extubated intensive care unit patients

PurposeOrotracheal intubation is known to impair cough reflex, but the validity of cough reflex testing (CRT) as a screening tool for silent aspiration in this population is unknown.Material and methodsOne hundred and six participants in a tertiary-level intensive care unit (ICU) underwent CRT and videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (VES) within 24 hours of extubation. Cough reflex threshold was established for each participant using nebulized citric acid.ResultsThirty-nine (37%) participants had an absent cough to CRT. Thirteen (12%) participants aspirated on VES, 9 (69%) without a cough response. Sensitivity of CRT to identify silent aspiration was excellent, but specificity was poor. There was a significant correlation between intubation duration and presence of aspiration on VES (P= .0107). There was no significant correlation between silent aspiration on VES and length of intubation, age, sex, diagnosis at intensive care unit admission, indication for intubation, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, morphine equivalent dose, or time of testing postextubation.ConclusionsIntensive care unit patients are at increased risk of aspiration in the 24 hours following extubation, and an impaired cough reflex is common. However, CRT overidentifies risk of silent aspiration in this population.     

Clinical progression and outcome of individuals with and without swallowing impairment following non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Purpose: To establish the clinical profiles of individuals with and without dysphagia following non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), and to further describe the clinical progression and outcome of dysphagia within the acute phase for those individuals with dysphagia.

Method: Retrospective chart review of 250 patients consecutively admitted with non-traumatic SAH to a major, tertiary neurosurgery referral centre in Australia over a three-year period. Clinical information associated with usual clinical care was collected for the duration of the acute hospital admission. Characteristics of participants with dysphagia (n?=?73/250) were further analysed to evaluate dysphagia progression and recovery.

Result: Participants with dysphagia took 10.93 times longer to commence oral intake following admission than those without dysphagia (p?<?0.01). Those with dysphagia took approximately 12.86 times longer to reach total oral feeding than those without dysphagia (p?<?0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between groups for time to SLP referral (p?=?0.549) or commencement of supplemental feeding (p?=?0.256). Safe management of thin fluids occurred for >50% of participants by weeks 2 and 3 following admission, with 75.34% of participants with dysphagia resuming thin fluids by discharge. Safe management of full diet took slightly longer with 32.88% of participants resuming unmodified diet by week 3. By discharge, only 53.42% of participants resumed a full diet.

Conclusion: The clinical progression and recovery of dysphagia within the acute phase following non-traumatic SAH can be protracted for some patients, necessitating ongoing speech-language pathology (SLP) input after discharge. The study findings will enhance SLP assessment processes, management focuses and guide prognostic decision making for this population.     

The addition of respiratory muscle strength training to facilitate swallow and pulmonary rehabilitation following massive tissue loss and severe deconditioning: A case series

IntroductionImpaired respiratory and swallow function in patients with intensive care unit–acquired deconditioning, such as associated with massive tissue loss, is not uncommon and can require prolonged rehabilitation.AimThe aim of the study was to examine the effect of combined inspiratory and expiratory respiratory muscle strength training (RMST) on respiratory and swallow function in two critical care patients with marked deconditioning after massive tissue loss.MethodsCase 1 was a 19-year-old male patient with 80% body surface area burns; case 2 was a 45-year-old man with group A streptococcus myositis necessitating quadruple amputation. Both required prolonged intensive care and mechanical ventilation. Both received routine intensive pulmonary and swallow rehabilitation before the trial; however, chronic aspiration and poor secretion clearance remained. At 25 and 26 weeks after initial injury, RMST was performed using EMST150 (expiratory) and Threshold IMT (inspiratory) devices, respectively. At baseline and throughout treatment, data collected included peak expiratory flow (PEF), anthropometry measures, aspiration risk (Penetration-Aspiration Scale [PAS]), pharyngeal clearance (Yale Pharyngeal Residue Scale), secretions (New Zealand Secretion Scale [NZSS]), and functional diet (Functional Oral Intake Scale [FOIS]) via endoscopy.Results/discussionAt baseline, the PEF score of case 1 was 41% (predicted age–height norm) and the PEF score of case 2 was 14%, indicating severe expiratory compromise. Both had extreme energy requirements (3300 kcal/day; 3500 kcal/day). The baseline swallowing scores of case 1 and 2 were as follows: PAS, 8 and 8; Yale, 9 and 10; NZSS, 4 and 7; and FOIS, 1 and 1, respectively, indicating profound dysphagia. At week 3 of 7 of RMST, swallow function improved to allow both to commence oral intake, followed by tracheostomy decannulation. At weeks 10 and 11, full dysphagia resolution was achieved (FOIS = 7; PAS = 1, Yale = 2, NZSS = 0), with PEF at 70% and 48% predicted respectively. Both patients continued RMST, and at discharge from the acute facility, PEF was 84% and 80% predicted respectively.ConclusionThe addition of RMST assisted swallow and pulmonary rehabilitation in both cases and was clinically viable to deliver. Controlled validation trials are now required.     

Dysphagia Characteristics of Patients Post SARS-CoV-2 During Inpatient Rehabilitation

ObjectiveTo investigate dysphagia in patients recovering from SARS-CoV-2 admitted to acute inpatient rehabilitation by summarizing clinical swallow evaluation and videofluoroscopic swallow study findings.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingUrban inpatient rehabilitation hospital.ParticipantsThe first inpatients admitted with SARS-CoV-2 (N=40) who participated in a videofluoroscopic swallow study.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresPatient characteristics upon admission (duration of intubation, tracheostomy status, comorbidities, videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) completion at previous level of care); admission International Dysphagia Diet level (IDDSI); Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA), Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), dysphagia severity rating; penetration aspiration scale (PAS) rated during VFSS; and IDDSI level recommended after completion of VFSS.ResultsTwenty percent of patients had been evaluated by videofluoroscopy in acute care. Nineteen of 37 (51%) individuals were upgraded to IDDSI level 7 regular diet with level 0 thin liquids and achieved a FOIS of 7 after the completion of the VFSS. Five individuals (13%) received a diet downgrade or remained on the same diet recommendations from their admission. Total numerical score (TNS) of less than 170 on the MASA predicted presence of aspiration in 27% of patients (6 of 22). Seventy-two percent of the sample (16 of 22) had a TNS less than 170 but did not demonstrate any instances of aspiration. The odds of patients having a PAS of 3 or greater increased by approximately 15% (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.27; P=.013). Thus, with each additional day of intubation during acute care stay, there was a 15% greater likelihood of having airway invasion.ConclusionsInstrumental swallow evaluations are imperative to diagnose and treat dysphagia in the post-coronavirus disease population. Because of the heterogeneity of this population, high incidence of prolonged intubation, and limitations of the clinical swallowing evaluation, instrumental assessments need to be performed on a more consistent basis as infection prevention protocols evolve.     

Clinical predictors of dysphagia and aspiration risk: outcome measures in acute stroke patients

OBJECTIVE: To use an established dysphagia clinical screening system to evaluate outcomes in acute stroke patients. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Acute stroke patients (n = 56) consecutively referred to a speech pathology service. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes (ie, pneumonia, dietary status at discharge) in patients who were referred for a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VSS) based on results of a previously validated clinical screening system were compared with outcomes in patients who were not referred for VSS based on the clinical evaluation. RESULTS: Thirty-eight of 56 patients (68%) presented with 2 or more clinical predictors of moderate to severe dysphagia and were further evaluated with VSS, whereas 18 patients (32%) had fewer than 2 clinical features and were not evaluated radiographically. Based on patient outcomes and VSS results, identification of at least 2 clinical predictors significantly distinguished patients with moderate to severe dysphagia from patients with mild dysphagia or normal swallowing. None of the patients in either group developed pneumonia while following recommendations of the clinical or dynamic swallowing evaluation, and 93% of the patients returned to a regular diet. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that clinical use of this screening system can objectively identify acute stroke patients who warrant further diagnostic studies and can safely determine which patients need no further deglutitive evaluation.     

Time to analgesia for care delivered by nurse practitioners in the emergency department – a retrospective chart audit

ObjectivesTo evaluate quality of care delivered to patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with pain and managed by emergency nurse practitioners by:

• 1Evaluating time to analgesia from initial presentation
• 2Evaluating time from being seen to next analgesia
• 3Measuring pain score documentation

BackgroundThe delivery of quality care in the emergency department (ED) is emerging as one of the most important service indicators being measured by health services. Emergency nurse practitioner services are designed to improve timely, quality care for patients. One of the goals of quality emergency care is the timely and effective delivery of analgesia for patients. Timely analgesia is an important indicator of ED service performance.MethodsA retrospective explicit chart review of 128 consecutive patients with pain and managed by emergency nurse practitioners was conducted. Data collected included demographics, presenting complaint, pain scores, and time to first dose of analgesia. Patients were identified from the ED patient information system (Cerner log) and data were extracted from electronic medical records.ResultsPain scores were documented in 67 (52.3%; 95% CI: 43.3–61.2) patients. The median time to analgesia from presentation was 60.5 (IQR 30–87) minutes, with 34 (26.6%; 95% CI: 19.1–35.1) patients receiving analgesia within 30 minutes of presentation to hospital. There were 22 (17.2%; 95% CI: 11.1–24.9) patients who received analgesia prior to assessment by a nurse practitioner. Among patients who received analgesia after assessment by a nurse practitioner, the median time to analgesia after assessment was 25 (IQR 12–50) minutes, with 65 (61.3%; 95% CI: 51.4–70.6) patients receiving analgesia within 30 minutes of assessment.ConclusionsThe majority of patients assessed by nurse practitioners received analgesia within 30 minutes after assessment. However, opportunities for substantial improvement in such times along with documentation of pain scores were identified and will be targeted in future research.     

Functional and physiological outcomes from an exercise-based dysphagia therapy: a pilot investigation of the McNeill Dysphagia Therapy Program

Crary MA, Carnaby GD, LaGorio LA, Carvajal PJ. Functional and physiological outcomes from an exercise-based dysphagia therapy: a pilot investigation of the McNeill Dysphagia Therapy Program.ObjectiveTo investigate functional and physiological changes in swallowing performance of adults with chronic dysphagia after an exercise-based dysphagia therapy.DesignIntervention study: before-after trial with 3-month follow-up evaluation.SettingOutpatient clinic within a tertiary care academic health science center.ParticipantsAdults (N=9) with chronic (>12mo) dysphagia after unsuccessful prior therapies. Subjects were identified from among patients referred to an outpatient dysphagia clinic. Subjects had dysphagia secondary to prior treatment for head/neck cancer or from neurologic injury. All subjects demonstrated clinical and fluoroscopic evidence of oropharyngeal dysphagia. No subject withdrew during the course of this study.InterventionsAll subjects completed 3 weeks of an intensive, exercise-based dysphagia therapy. Therapy was conducted daily for 1h/d, with additional activities completed by subjects each night between therapy sessions.Main Outcome MeasuresPrimary outcomes were clinical and functional change in swallowing performance with maintenance at 3 months after intervention. Secondary, exploratory outcomes included physiological change in swallow performance measured by hyolaryngeal elevation, lingual-palatal and pharyngeal manometric pressure, and surface electromyographic amplitude.ResultsClinical and functional swallowing performances improved significantly and were maintained at the 3-month follow-up examination. Subject perspective (visual analog scale) on functional swallowing also improved. Four of 7 subjects who were initially feeding tube dependent progressed to total oral intake after 3 weeks of intervention. Physiological indices demonstrated increased swallowing effort after intervention.ConclusionsSignificant clinical and functional improvement in swallowing performance followed a time-limited (3wk) exercise-based intervention in a sample of subjects with chronic dysphagia. Physiological changes after therapy implicate improved neuromuscular functioning within the swallow mechanism.     

Examining changes in knowledge and practice in nurse practitioners after an online educational module on obstructive sleep apnea

AimsThe purpose of this study is to investigate primary care nurse practitioner (NP) knowledge and knowledge retention on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) screening after an educational in-service.BackgroundThe prevalence of OSA is high and continues to rise amid the obesity epidemic. Approximately 75–90 % of individuals with moderate to severe OSA remain undiagnosed. Continuing education of OSA risk factors among primary care providers may increase screening rates, leading to early diagnosis and treatment.MethodsAn educational module was presented to NPs (n = 30) during a mandatory NP in-service at two sets of outpatient clinics. Knowledge was assessed with a pre-test and post-test survey consisting of 23 items. A 25-item follow-up test was administered five weeks after to assess knowledge retention.ResultsAn increase in total knowledge scores was demonstrated between the pre-test and post-test with a decrease in knowledge observed at follow-up. Follow-up test total mean scores remained above pre-test levels, indicating potential long-term learning.ConclusionsWhile learning was demonstrated, NPs acknowledged continued barriers to screening for OSA such as time and having no OSA screening tool available in the electronic medical record (EMR).     

The effects of abdominal-based early progressive mobilisation on gastric motility in endotracheally intubated intensive care patients: A randomised controlled trial

ObjectiveTo examine whether an abdominal-based early progressive mobilisation program improves gastric motility and reduces feeding intolerance in critically ill patients with endotracheal intubation.Design and MethodsA randomised controlled trial was designed. Adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit who were intubated and had an order for enteral nutrition were randomly assigned to partake in an three stages of abdominal-based progressive mobilisation program (passive abdominal massage, bed-side bicycle and ambulating) or standard of care. Gastric antral motility was measured by bedside ultrasound.ResultsA total of 83 critically ill patients were included in the study. The intervention group displayed a statistically significant improvement in the antral motility index than the control group (p < .001), as well as in complications of feeding intolerance, including the incidence of abdominal distention (9.8% vs 33.3%, p = .009), vomiting (0% vs 16.7%, p = .019) and diarrhoea (22% vs 50%, p = .008). However, no significant difference for the full enteral feeding rate on the third day was observed between the groups. Furthermore, time on mechanical ventilation (4.52 ± 2.77 days vs 6.24 ± 3.90 days, p = .023) was shorter in intervention group, but no significant difference of length of intensive care unit stay was observed between the groups.ConclusionsImplementation of an abdominal-based early progressive mobilisation program can improve gastric motility and feeding intolerance in critically ill patients with an endotracheal tube.     

Critical congenital heart disease screening does not predict car seat tolerance screen outcomes

BackgroundCar Seat Tolerance Screening (CSTS) and Critical Congenital Heart Disease (CCHD) screens were both implemented to identify infants with cardiorespiratory distress. We hypothesized that the CCHD screen would be poorly sensitive to predict a failed CSTS for many reasons.MethodsRetrospective record review of infants in 2013 who qualified for CSTS. Calculated sensitivity, specificity, predictive value (PV) of a failed CCHD screen to identify those infants who failed their CSTS.Results270 subjects underwent both screens and 14 failed a CSTS (5.2%). Of these, 1 failed the CCHD and 1 had an equivocal result. None were diagnosed with CCHD. An abnormal CCHD (failed or equivocal) had a sensitivity = 14.3% and a PV = 40% for predicting CSTS failure.ConclusionsCCHD screening is poorly sensitive and has poor PV for identifying those infants who are at risk of failing a CSTS. We therefore cannot recommend replacement of the CSTS with routine CCHD screening.